Home Blog

JD Vance is under immense pressure to do one unthinkable act

Prudent Politics
-
0
JD Vance is under immense pressure to do one unthinkable act

Vance is eyeing the White House. Plenty have crowned him Trump’s successor.

And now JD Vance is under immense pressure to do one unthinkable act.

Pressure Mounts for Vance to Break Ties

Vice President JD Vance has faced repeated calls to repudiate or at least publicly distance himself from Tucker Carlson, the popular podcaster and former Fox News host, following controversies including Carlson’s friendly interview with white nationalist and Holocaust revisionist Nick Fuentes in late 2025.

That appearance, defended by Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, led to significant internal fallout at the think tank. Critics argue that Vance’s close association with Carlson—whom he credits for helping secure his 2024 vice-presidential nomination—could harm his standing as a leading 2028 GOP presidential contender.

Conservative activist Laura Loomer has been vocal in urging Vance to condemn Carlson, posting on X: “Tucker is going to destroy J.D. Vance’s Presidential campaign” unless he acts, and adding: “I am growing very alarmed by JD Vance’s refusal to condemn some of the crazy positions Tucker has taken.”

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro also weighed in, telling Fox News: “He should not allow for a Nick Fuentes or a Tucker Carlson or others who are promoting antisemitic views to be platformed.” A National Review headline captured the sentiment: “Vance Will Have to Choose Between Tucker and the Presidency.”

Vance Defends Carlson as a Friend and Conservative Voice

Vance has shown no indication of backing away from Carlson, instead defending him firmly. In response to growing criticism after the Heritage controversy, Vance stated: “Tucker’s a friend of mine” and “I am not going to get into the business of throwing friends under the bus.”

In a December 2025 UnHerd interview, he elaborated: “The idea that Tucker Carlson, who has one of the largest podcasts in the world, who has millions of listeners, who supported Trump in the 2024 election, who supported me in the 2024 election, the idea that his views are somehow completely anathema to conservatism, that he has no place in the conservative movement, is frankly absurd. And I don’t think anybody actually believes it.”

Carlson, whose Tucker Carlson Network reaches millions and who has appeared at the White House with President Trump in recent months, remains a key figure in right-wing media circles.

Ongoing Ties and Political Context

The relationship traces back years, with Carlson playing a pivotal role in promoting Vance’s 2022 Senate run and reportedly influencing Trump’s 2024 VP selection.

Despite criticisms of Carlson’s platforming of fringe figures, his sharp critiques of Israel and U.S. foreign policy, and statements like calling “Christian Zionists” sufferers of a “brain virus,” Vance has maintained the alliance.

A recent Harvard CAPS/Harris poll showed Vance leading GOP presidential preferences among Republicans at 53%, suggesting limited immediate backlash.

The debate highlights divisions within the conservative movement over figures like Carlson, with some warning of coalition fractures while others prioritize unity and free speech. Vance’s refusal to denounce has drawn scrutiny but aligns with his stated commitment to loyalty and rejecting what he views as unfair guilt-by-association tactics.

President Trump just made a phone call that changed these Americans’ lives

Prudent Politics
-
0
President Trump just made a phone call that changed these Americans’ lives

Donald Trump is known for making a difference. That’s why he was elected as president twice.

And President Trump just made a phone call that changed these Americans’ lives.

In a heartfelt moment that captures the essence of true American heroism, President Trump personally called the parents of fallen Army Staff Sgt. Michael Ollis to deliver news that honors their son’s ultimate sacrifice.

The Staten Island native, who gave his life in Afghanistan more than ten years ago, will receive the Medal of Honor posthumously, recognizing his extraordinary bravery on the battlefield.

Robert and Linda Ollis were at home in their kitchen on Staten Island when the call came in on Monday.

A video shared on the SSG Michael Ollis Freedom Foundation’s Facebook page shows the president checking in on the couple, asking about their well-being amid the anticipation.

“We’re very nervous,” Robert stated.

Trump’s response cut straight to the point, building the excitement. “You should be, because your son is going to get the highest honor that you can have,” he said.

“There is no higher honor than the Congressional Medal of Honor.”

The father’s face transformed in an instant, beaming with pride as the weight of the words sank in. This upgrade from the Distinguished Service Cross, which Ollis had received earlier, marks a long-overdue tribute to a soldier who embodied selfless courage.

Trump added a touching personal note, imagining Ollis watching over them. “He’s looking down at you right now, he’s saying, ‘Well, my mom and dad are handling this pretty well,’” the president stated.

At just 24 years old, Ollis served as an infantryman in the Army when tragedy struck on August 28, 2013.

During a fierce Taliban assault on Forward Operating Base Ghazni in Afghanistan, he faced unimaginable danger head-on.

In the midst of the attack, Ollis spotted a suicide bomber closing in on a Polish officer. Without hesitation, he positioned himself as a human shield, taking the full force of the explosion and saving the officer’s life in the process.

His quick thinking and valor didn’t stop there—witnesses credit his actions with shielding over 40 fellow service members and civilians from harm, turning what could have been a devastating loss into a story of triumph through sacrifice.

For years, the Ollis family, along with veteran organizations, local leaders, and especially U.S. Rep. Nicole Malliotakis from New York, pushed relentlessly to see this recognition elevated.

Their persistence paid off when Trump greenlit the Medal of Honor.

GOP Senator rushed to the hospital for this scary reason

Prudent Politics
-
0
GOP Senator rushed to the hospital for this scary reason

Poor health is becoming a real issue for this politician. Hospital visits are becoming more common for them.

And a GOP Senator was rushed to the hospital for this scary reason.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) landed in the hospital Monday night, dealing with what his team calls flu-like symptoms. This comes as no surprise given the veteran lawmaker’s recent string of health scares, but his camp is staying optimistic.

Andrew Desiderio from Punchbowl News broke the story on X, sharing details from McConnell’s spokesman, David Popp. The update painted a picture of caution rather than crisis.

“In an abundance of caution, after experiencing flu-like symptoms over the weekend, Senator McConnell checked himself into a local hospital for evaluation last night,” Popp stated.

“His prognosis is positive and he is grateful for the excellent care he is receiving.”

Popp went on to note that McConnell remains plugged in, handling duties from afar. He’s “in regular contact with his staff and looks forward to returning to Senate business.”

This health hiccup meant McConnell skipped out on key Senate votes both Monday and Tuesday, as Politico pointed out. It’s a reminder of how even top Republicans aren’t immune to everyday ailments.

But this isn’t the first time McConnell’s health has grabbed headlines. Back in October, Breitbart News’s Hannah Knudsen detailed a nasty fall he took amid harassment from radical leftists.

Knudsen reported that McConnell, now 83, was navigating the Russell basement when activists from the Sunrise Movement ambushed him with loaded questions about immigration enforcement:

“According to reports, McConnell — now 83 years old — was walking through the Russell basement while members of the leftist Sunrise Movement questioned him. In the beginning of the video, McConnell holds the arm of another person and eventually lets go, walking on his own. A questioner then asked him, ‘I want to ask, do you support ICE taking working people off the streets and kidnapping them?’”

“Right before she got to the end of her question, McConnell can be seen grabbing the arm of the man next to him before tumbling to the floor. Two people then helped pick him up, and McConnell proceeded to wave to the camera before slowly walking away with a man on each side. He walked out of the area on his own, without holding on to others for support.”

These kinds of confrontations from far-left groups like Sunrise Movement show the aggressive tactics they use against conservative leaders.

McConnell brushed it off and kept moving.

That October tumble followed another slip-up just months earlier. In December 2024, McConnell took a spill at the U.S. Capitol right “after the Senate Republican Conference’s weekly Tuesday lunch.”

Falls like these raise questions about the physical demands of D.C. politics, especially for older politicians like McConnell.

Beyond the falls, McConnell has faced other odd moments in the spotlight. In August 2023, during a press gaggle, he hit a snag when grilled about reelection plans.

Reporters watched as McConnell laughed and mumbled before he froze up. It was a brief but bizarre pause that fueled speculation.

JD Vance doubles down and takes the fight to Democrats

Prudent Politics
-
0
JD Vance doubles down and takes the fight to Democrats

Vance hasn’t been known to pull punches. And he isn’t going to back down.

Because JD Vance doubled down and took the fight to Democrats

Vance Defends His Stance Without Apology

Vice President JD Vance has firmly declined to offer an apology to the family of the deceased ICU nurse Alex Pretti following his endorsement of a claim by White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller labeling Pretti as an “assassin.” When pressed by The Daily Mail on Tuesday about retracting the description, Vance responded sharply: “For what?”

He elaborated: “If something is determined, that the guy who shot Alex Pretti did something bad, then a lot of consequences are going to flow from that. We’ll let that happen. I don’t think it’s smart to prejudge the investigation.”

This resolute position underscores Vance’s emphasis on protecting those who serve on the front lines and avoiding hasty conclusions in high-stakes situations.

The Minneapolis Confrontation and Immediate Backlash

The incident unfolded on January 24 in Minneapolis, where 37-year-old Pretti was fatally shot by a Border Patrol agent and a Customs and Border Protection agent during a physical altercation. Shortly after, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) took to X, declaring: “ICE must leave Minneapolis” and “Congress should not fund this version of ICE.”

Miller swiftly countered on the platform: “An assassin tried to murder federal agents,” and “and this is your response.”

Vance amplified Miller’s message by reposting it from his personal account, where it still stands, even as footage emerged indicating Pretti had been disarmed prior to the shooting. President Trump, when asked about Miller’s wording on January 27, distanced himself slightly: “I haven’t heard that. But he shouldn’t have been carrying a gun.”

Trump further commented: “Bottom line, everybody in this room, we view that as a very unfortunate incident, OK? Everyone, unless you’re a stupid person. Very, very unfortunate … I don’t like that he had a gun, I don’t like that he had two fully loaded magazines. That’s a lot of bad stuff.”

Commitment to Investigation and Calming Tensions

In the aftermath, the administration has taken proactive steps, with President Trump sending border czar Tom Homan to Minneapolis to de-escalate the situation. The involved agents are on administrative leave, and the Justice Department is probing potential civil rights violations in Pretti’s death.

Reaffirming his prudent approach, Vance stressed on Tuesday: “Let’s do the investigation. Let’s figure out, did these officers have a reasonable fear of Alex Pretti given what happened? Did they engage in lawful conduct or unlawful conduct? Let’s let the investigation determine those things.”

Vance’s measured insistence on facts over emotion continues to resonate as a voice of reason, prioritizing justice and the safety of federal officers in an increasingly polarized debate.

Liberal billionaires just turned their crosshairs on ICE

Prudent Politics
-
0
Liberal billionaires just turned their crosshairs on ICE

All ICE is doing is enforcing the law. But they’ve got a big target on their backs.

Now liberal billionaires just turned their crosshairs on ICE.

The Facade of Spontaneous Outrage Crumbles

What the left peddles as authentic grassroots fury against ICE is nothing more than a well-oiled machine funded by shadowy billionaire networks, some with alarming ties to Communist China.

In Minneapolis, a massive “ICE Out” march drew an estimated 15,000 activists chanting demands to dismantle federal immigration enforcement, but behind the scenes, it’s elite donors pulling the strings. These protests, erupting conveniently during President Trump’s terms, reveal the hypocrisy of progressives who claim to fight “the man” while being propped up by ultra-wealthy puppeteers.

The so-called 50501 network, which organized the event, sprang up anonymously on Reddit after Trump’s second inauguration in January 2025. Founded by a mysterious user known as u/Evolved_Fungi, it masquerades as a decentralized response to Trump’s policies. But experts aren’t buying the organic narrative.

“My team’s best judgement is that it’s the Neville Singham network that is most active [in Minnesota], partly because that’s the most crazy network. But they aren’t alone,” said Scott Walter of the Capital Research Center. Singham, a billionaire operating out of Shanghai, funnels cash to radical groups like The People’s Forum and the Party for Socialism and Liberation, raising red flags about foreign meddling in American affairs.

Billionaire Backers and Radical Alliances

Dig deeper, and the funding trail leads straight to the usual suspects on the left: George Soros’s Open Society Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Arabella network, Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss, the Amalgamated Charitable Foundation, and the McKnight Foundation. These entities have poured millions into anti-Trump causes since 2016, with Wyss alone shelling out $293.6 million to various groups. The Sunrise Movement snagged at least $2 million from Arabella since 2016, while Indivisible raked in $107,000 from Arabella, $6.5 million from Wyss, and $7.6 million from Open Society.

Even more disturbing is the blending of mainstream leftists with hardcore communists. “What’s new is, we are seeing truly extreme communist splinter groups showing up alongside an American Federation for Teachers union or the Ford Foundation. That’s a disturbing trend for us who follow these things. Normally, they wouldn’t have been cheek by jowl publicly with those people… That kind of self-policing on the left seems to be disappearing,” Walter noted. Groups like Unidos Minnesota and Monarca benefit from $1 million in grants funneled through Tending the Soil Minnesota, while Voices of Florida pocketed $100,000 from the Ford Foundation. The Bernie Sanders-linked Political Revolution and the American Federation of Teachers are also in the mix, showing how far the rot has spread.

Ian Oxnevad from the National Association of Scholars points out the selective outrage: “Have you noticed there’s no pro-Palestinian and anti-ICE protests going on at the same time? If it was organic, you would see multiple protests going on simultaneously, but you don’t see that… There’s no mass protests like this against what is going on in Iran, for example, or any of number of genocides that have happened. It’s always very specific causes that are anti-Western, essentially.” This cherry-picking exposes the protests as manufactured chaos aimed at undermining American sovereignty.

Unmasking the Coordinated Assault on America

The left’s panic is palpable as Trump rolls back their destructive agendas, something spineless Republicans of the past never dared.

“I don’t think it’s just anti-Trump. Trump threatens what the left has seen as a lot of progress that they’ve made towards their agenda over the past several decades… Typically you have Republicans that don’t really roll back any left-wing initiatives, they just slow them down. Trump’s actually rolling a lot of them back. That threatens the left’s agenda overall. And that’s something they haven’t really seen before,” Oxnevad explained.

House Oversight Committee Republicans are investigating Singham’s network for potential Foreign Agents Registration Act violations and links to Chinese Communist Party propaganda.

Meanwhile, the mainstream media plays along, portraying these astroturfed events as heartfelt uprisings. “The mainstream media is very happy to be always pretend it’s just poor ordinary Americans outraged by this horrible injustice. But, no, the guy who organized it is a leader in five or 10 different little entities,” Walter said. The 50501 network has already claimed credit for 11 mass demonstrations since Trump’s return, including anti-Elon Musk rallies and “No Kings” protests, all shrouded in opacity.

u/Evolved_Fungi, in a rare interview, gushed about the turnout: “I really felt like people needed something to connect to, and just seeing everybody struggle with what to do it was like ‘here. Here’s a date. Here’s a time. Here’s a place. Go.’ […] It was amazing. I was absolutely thrilled with the response.” But with funders like Arabella, Ford, and Open Society stonewalling inquiries, the true agenda remains hidden. This isn’t democracy in action—it’s a billionaire-funded assault on law and order, designed to sow division and weaken America from within.

Tim Walz is in big trouble after what Trump just threatened him with

Prudent Politics
-
0
Tim Walz is in big trouble after what Trump just threatened him with

Trump is no fan of Walz. He knows he’s incompetent.

And Tim Walz is in big trouble after what Trump just threatened him with.

The Biden-era obsession with radical gender ideology is finally meeting real resistance, and Minnesota is now squarely in the crosshairs. On Monday, the Department of Education escalated its investigation into Minnesota’s transgender athlete policies by referring the case to the Department of Justice, opening the door to severe consequences for the state.

This move puts Minnesota on the brink of losing federal education and health funding after state leaders flatly refused to work with the Trump administration. Federal investigators determined that Minnesota violated Title IX by allowing biological males to compete against female athletes.

According to reporting from The Daily Caller, the potential funding cuts would impact what Minnesota gets from both the Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services. The referral to DOJ comes at a time when Minnesota is already under federal scrutiny for immigration enforcement failures and alleged large-scale fraud.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon made clear where the administration stands. “As Minnesota reels from a fraud scandal, @GovTimWalz is fighting to keep men in women’s sports,” she said in a post on X. “Now, he’ll have to make his case in court.”

Federal investigators concluded last September that the Minnesota State High School League violated Title IX by permitting boys who identify as girls to play in girls’ sports.

Rather than protect girls, Minnesota’s education bureaucracy doubled down.

The state’s Department of Education claimed that Title IX “requires schools provide transgender students with the right to participate in…athletics in a manner consistent with their gender identity” and insisted that “transgender and gender nonconforming students should be afforded the opportunity to use the restroom of their choice.”

McMahon didn’t mince words in her response. “Despite repeated opportunities to comply with Title IX, Minnesota has chosen defiance – continuing to jeopardize the safety of women and girls, deny them fair competition, and erode their right to equal access in educational programs and activities,” she said to The Daily Caller.

She made the administration’s intentions unmistakable: “The Trump Administration will not stop until accountability is delivered for Minnesota’s students.”

Instead of reconsidering its position, Minnesota’s leadership turned to the courts.

Far-left Attorney General Keith Ellison sued the Trump admin because of the president’s executive order that banned men from competing in female sports.

Trump’s executive order, signed in February, bans boys and men from playing against women athletes.

The order has already sparked enforcement actions against Maine and California.

Minnesota’s defiance now places it firmly on that same list.

As Washington presses forward, the message is clear: states that sacrifice girls’ sports on the altar of progressive politics should expect consequences—and this time, they may be very real.

The Pentagon just sent out a warning about war in America

Prudent Politics
-
0
The Pentagon just sent out a warning about war in America

The US has been spared from conflict in the homeland. But that’s changing.

Because the Pentagon just sent out a warning about war in America.

The Pentagon’s freshly released 2026 National Defense Strategy confronts a hard reality head-on: the era when major wars stayed safely overseas is ending, and direct military threats to the American homeland have grown serious enough that future conflicts could strike U.S. territory itself.

This clear-eyed document places homeland defense at the absolute top of the military’s priorities, above every other mission, reflecting a strategic pivot designed to shield the continental United States from an array of escalating dangers that now include nuclear strikes, conventional long-range attacks, cyber operations, space weapons, and electromagnetic warfare.

The strategy bluntly states that the Joint Force must stand ready to deter aggression and, if necessary, to prevail—including by launching decisive operations against targets anywhere in the world, even directly from American soil.

It emphasizes that America should never, and will never, be left vulnerable to nuclear blackmail, underscoring an ironclad commitment to deterrence that leaves no room for adversaries to hold the homeland hostage.

The document identifies the principal threats with unflinching clarity. China’s historic military expansion now includes intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of reaching deep into the continental United States, while Russia maintains a formidable arsenal of ICBMs, advanced cyber tools, space capabilities, and undersea systems that can threaten American territory.

North Korea has demonstrated long-range missiles judged able to strike the homeland, and Iran, though lacking ICBMs that can reach the United States, continues to pose dangers through medium-range and hypersonic missiles, regional aggression, and persistent nuclear ambitions.

The strategy makes plain that these threats are no longer abstract; modern weapons compress warning times, erase traditional geographic buffers, and raise the possibility that adversaries could act together or exploit distractions elsewhere to bring violence directly to American shores.

In response, the Pentagon is doubling down on measures that put American security and sovereignty first. The strategy strongly endorses President Trump’s Golden Dome missile defense initiative as essential to defeating large-scale missile barrages and sophisticated aerial attacks.

It calls for rapid expansion of counter-drone systems, strengthened cyber defenses, long-range strike options launched from within the United States, and hardened infrastructure capable of withstanding cyber and electromagnetic assaults. Nuclear modernization remains non-negotiable to guarantee credible deterrence.

At the same time, the document treats border security, the flow of illegal drugs, and control over critical terrain such as the Panama Canal and Greenland as core military responsibilities rather than peripheral concerns.

Perhaps most importantly, it demands that allies step up dramatically—spending far more on their own defense and taking primary responsibility for regional security—so American forces can concentrate on protecting the homeland and confronting the gravest dangers without being overstretched.

This is a strategy rooted in peace through strength, one that refuses to apologize for prioritizing the safety of American citizens, territory, and way of life above all else.

By elevating homeland defense, rebuilding the defense industrial base to produce weapons at the scale and speed the nation needs, and insisting on real burden-sharing from allies, it positions the United States to remain secure, dominant, and fully prepared in a world where threats no longer respect oceans or borders.

The message is unmistakable: America is awake to the dangers, and it is acting decisively to meet them on its own terms.

Bill Maher hits Democrats upside the head with a surprise they never saw coming

Prudent Politics
-
0
Bill Maher hits Democrats upside the head with a surprise they never saw coming

Maher has broken with the radical Left. Now he’s going on offense.

And Bill Maher hit Democrats upside the head with a surprise they never saw coming

Maher’s Blunt Advice: Democrats Need to Muzzle Hollywood Elites to Salvage Their Image

Comedian Bill Maher has delivered a stark warning to Democrats, urging them to distance themselves from celebrity endorsements that only alienate everyday voters. Pointing to Hollywood as the hub of out-of-touch progressive extremism, Maher argues that these stars’ vocal activism is dragging the party down, especially in a political landscape where common-sense appeals win elections. This critique highlights how Democrats’ cozy relationship with fame-obsessed liberals often backfires, prioritizing performative wokeness over relatable policies that resonate with the broader American public.

“Hollywood [is] sort of the epicenter of the woke left. I don’t think they’re doing the Democratic party any favors,” Maher said. He added, “If Democrats want to win elections in the future, job one, tell the celebrities to ‘Just shut the f—k up. You’re not helping. You don’t strike people in most of the country as sensible or in touch with reality.’”

Examples abound, like celebrities Natasha Lyonne, Mark Ruffalo, and Jean Smart donning “Be Good” pins at the Golden Globes to commemorate Renee Nicole Good, killed in a confrontation with an ICE agent in Minneapolis—a gesture that underscores the disconnect between elite virtue-signaling and real-world concerns.

Hollywood’s Petty Backlash Against Maher Exposes Leftist Intolerance

Maher’s willingness to call out excesses on the left has earned him scorn from his peers, revealing the thin-skinned nature of Hollywood’s progressive bubble. At the Golden Globes, comedian Wanda Sykes took a swipe at him while presenting the best stand-up comedy award, for which Maher was nominated with his HBO special *Is Anyone Else Seeing This?*. This kind of sniping illustrates how Democrats’ celebrity allies often stifle dissent, preferring echo chambers over honest debate—a tactic that only reinforces voter skepticism toward the party’s elitist leanings.

“Bill Maher, you give us so much. But I would love a little less,” Sykes quipped. Accepting on behalf of winner Ricky Gervais, she added, “Ricky Gervais says he would like to thank God. And the trans community.”

Maher, unfazed, attributes his lack of awards to his candid style: “I speak freely, and this woke town f–king hates that. And that’s okay. I’ve made my peace with that.” In his special, he skewers universities as “four-year daycare [centers] for the crybullies of the privileged” and notes, “You wonder why the left catches more jokes from me? They changed, not me, OK?”

He also slammed the Golden Globes for snubbing Joe Rogan in podcast categories: “It was typical and predictable and also ridiculous that [Joe Rogan] wouldn’t be nominated in a category that he dominates.”

Maher Pushes for Centrism as Democrats Cling to Extremes

Beyond celebrities, Maher advocates for Democrats to embrace more balanced governance, criticizing one-party dominance in places like California where unchecked liberal policies have led to widespread issues. His praise for figures like Gov. Gavin Newsom comes with a plea to shift centerward, exposing how Democrats’ reluctance to marginalize their radicals continues to cost them politically. Meanwhile, Maher offers a nuanced take on the Trump era, refusing to succumb to blanket hatred—a refreshing contrast to the knee-jerk opposition from many on the left.

“California could stand for a lot more centrist policies,” Maher said, adding, “It’s just not a good thing when one party completely controls anything. That’s certainly true of the Republicans also, who are drunk with power in Washington, overstepping their bounds and doing things that are now making them unpopular. I would love to see both sides marginalize their crazies.”

On Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass: “Do I think she’s done a great job? No. But all cities are messy.” Regarding Newsom: “I think he’s a really great politician, and I’m always imploring him to move to the center. I think if a Democrat like Newsom moves more to the center, it’s good for the party and it’s good for the country.”

Commenting on Newsom’s memes and humor: “At the end of the day, that kind of stuff makes no difference except, maybe politically it’s fun to watch. Does it change anything in an election? I don’t think so. I don’t hate it, I don’t love it, I don’t care. It’s silly. It’s political theater.”

As *Real Time with Bill Maher* kicks off its 24th season with guests like Major General Paul Eaton, Sen. John Kennedy, and Kasie Hunt, Maher notes Trump’s agenda-setting power: “It’s a new year, but what hasn’t changed is that Donald Trump still controls the agenda. Much as you may not want to, we all will be talking about whatever he puts on the agenda. We didn’t think it would be Greenland, but it is this week. We didn’t think it would be war in Minneapolis, but it is.”

On Trump’s actions: “I really don’t like what’s going on with ICE, as most Americans don’t. I really don’t like what’s going on with the political retribution. But, you know, Venezuela, do I hate it? No, not completely.” He adds, “If you’re the kind of people who hate oppression, well, I mean, that’s a pretty big boot to lift off people’s heads. If Cuba goes next, that would be good.”

Reflecting on dining with Trump: “I don’t have Trump derangement syndrome. Having said that, there’s just a lot of stuff I don’t like, and I’m going to call it out.” He contrasts, “My whole personality, unlike a lot of the people out here, isn’t just Trump. I don’t hate everything.”

Radical Democrats were dealt a fatal blow they’ll never recover from

Prudent Politics
-
0
Radical Democrats were dealt a fatal blow they’ll never recover from

The Left is losing its grasp on power. And the numbers aren’t even close.

Now Radical Democrats were dealt a fatal blow they’ll never recover from.

Bari Weiss Delivers Ratings Surge at CBS News Amid Left-Wing Backlash

Bari Weiss, the new Editor-in-Chief of CBS News, has scored a notable victory with the network’s flagship broadcast hitting its highest viewership in years.

On January 19, 2026, CBS Evening News with anchor Tony Dokoupil drew 6.4 million total viewers—the program’s largest audience since 2021—and averaged 803,000 viewers in the key adults 25-54 demographic, according to Nielsen Big Data + Panel.

CBS News highlighted the milestone in a press release shared on X: “RATINGS: @CBSEveningNews with Tony Dokoupil delivers 6.4 million total viewers on Jan. 19 – its largest audience for the broadcast since 2021. The CBS News flagship evening broadcast also averaged 803K in the key adults 25-54 demographic, according to Nielsen Big Data + Panel…”

This strong performance stands out against ongoing criticism from former CBS staffers and progressive media outlets, who have accused Weiss of pushing for more balanced coverage that deviates from traditional left-leaning editorial slants.

The ratings spike suggests her changes may be resonating with a broader audience seeking less partisan reporting.

Weiss’s Push for Even-Handed Journalism Sparks Internal and External Revolt

Weiss has faced intense pushback since taking the helm, including an open letter signed by about 200 former CBS employees and industry figures urging Paramount CEO David Ellison to safeguard the network’s independence from what they called her “clumsy editorial interference.”

A recent controversy involved her decision to delay and add context to a 60 Minutes segment on a prison in El Salvador, citing the need for a response from the Trump administration—moves critics labeled as interference.

Former CBS anchor Dan Rather commented on her leadership: “It is also hard to believe Weiss will be an equitable steward of the storied news division …” Comedian David Letterman described CBS News as a “wreck,” claiming its integrity had been “eviscerated by these idiots that have taken it over.”

Other outlets, including The Guardian and The New York Times, have portrayed her tenure as chaotic, with one CBS journalist quoted as saying “there is blood in the water.” At the Golden Globes, host Nikki Glaser joked that CBS News was “America’s newest place to see BS news.”

Weiss has also implemented stricter newsroom accountability, including a memo requesting detailed weekly work-hour logs from staff.

Ratings Vindication for Weiss as Network Seeks Broader Appeal

The January 19 numbers provide concrete evidence that Weiss’s approach—emphasizing fairness and context in reporting—may be drawing viewers back to CBS Evening News.

While the broadcast still trails competitors like NBC and ABC in overall averages, this peak performance counters narratives of decline under her leadership and highlights the potential for renewed interest when networks move away from one-sided framing.

As CBS continues to navigate its transformation, these figures offer a clear metric: audiences are tuning in, suggesting that balanced journalism can win back trust in a polarized media landscape.

Trump was given a huge gift from the last person he ever expected

Prudent Politics
-
0
Trump was given a huge gift from the last person he ever expected

President Trump has made many enemies. But some are starting to see the light.

Now Trump was given a huge gift from the last person he ever expected.

Hirsi Ali Champions Trump’s Davos Wake-Up Call on Radical Threats

Renowned Somali-born activist and critic of radical Islamism, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, has come out in strong support of President Donald Trump’s powerful address at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where he spotlighted the “existential attack” facing Western civilization.

Hirsi Ali, who has long warned about the dangers of unchecked Islamist ideologies, hailed Trump’s speech as a much-needed dose of reality for global elites, emphasizing how his leadership is confronting threats that others have ignored for too long. This endorsement underscores Trump’s ability to rally influential voices in the fight against extremism, bolstering his America-first policies on the world stage.

“President Trump is right: we are under existential attack,” Hirsi Ali wrote in a post on X. “The Woke West has been asleep at the wheel. Trump’s speech at Davos is a wake-up call. Listen to him.”

Her praise aligns with Trump’s stark warnings about the alliance between radical Islamists, the Chinese Communist Party, and leftist ideologies eroding Western values—issues Hirsi Ali has dedicated her career to exposing.

Trump’s Unflinching Davos Message Resonates with Truth-Seekers Like Hirsi Ali

In his Davos remarks, President Trump didn’t hold back, declaring an “existential attack on our civilization” and urging leaders to recognize the perils of complacency.

His speech, which drew applause from some attendees while ruffling feathers among establishment figures, highlighted the need for strong borders, cultural preservation, and decisive action against ideological subversion.

Hirsi Ali’s commendation validates Trump’s approach, showing how his bold rhetoric is inspiring those who’ve faced these threats firsthand and reinforcing why his return to the White House has revitalized global security discussions.

“We are under attack by radical Islamists, by the Chinese Communist Party, and by the woke leftists who are destroying our culture from within,” Trump said in his speech. “This is an existential attack on our civilization, and we must fight back.”

Hirsi Ali echoed this sentiment, adding in her post: “Trump understands the threat better than most. His words at Davos cut through the nonsense.”

Building Alliances: Trump’s Leadership Draws Praise from Unlikely Quarters

Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s background—as a former Muslim who fled Somalia, sought asylum in the Netherlands, and became a vocal advocate for women’s rights and against honor killings—makes her endorsement particularly poignant.

Having faced threats for her views, she sees in Trump a leader willing to name the problems others dodge for political correctness.

This support from a respected international figure like Hirsi Ali highlights Trump’s skill in forging coalitions against common enemies, further cementing his legacy as a defender of freedom and Western ideals amid rising global tensions.

All hell broke loose after Michelle Obama broke back onto the political scene

Prudent Politics
-
0
All hell broke loose after Michelle Obama broke back onto the political scene

The Obamas never seem to go away. They aren’t done with trying to influence America.

Now all hell broke loose after Michelle Obama broke back onto the political scene.

Michelle Obama’s Tone-Deaf Advice Dismisses the Value of Full-Time Motherhood

In yet another eyebrow-raising appearance, former First Lady Michelle Obama used her January 21, 2026, interview on the “Call Her Daddy” podcast to discourage young mothers from prioritizing family over career—portraying children as inherently ungrateful for any sacrifices made on their behalf.

Her comments, delivered amid discussions of her own experiences raising Malia and Sasha while navigating high-profile roles, come across as dismissive of traditional family choices, suggesting that staying home full-time leads to regret once kids inevitably “close the door” and move on without appreciation.

This perspective feels particularly out of touch, especially from someone who benefited from immense privilege and support during her husband’s presidency.

“Let’s be more honest about the struggle … I am constantly telling young mothers it’s coming. You don’t have to get off your career track. And I don’t even recommend it,” she said. “Because kids grow up fast. And then they’re gone. You’ve sacrificed everything. And you know, when they leave, they leave. They close the door and act like you never sacrificed.”

She doubled down, warning of the emptiness that follows: “Because now what am I going to do? I devoted everything to you. And now I’ve got to fill my time. So I encourage people to hang in there and keep something for yourself throughout this process.”

Out-of-Touch Elitism: Children as “Ungrateful” for Maternal Devotion

Obama’s framing reduces profound acts of love and sacrifice to a bad investment, implying that full-time mothers who “devote everything” are setting themselves up for disappointment because kids will grow independent and fail to acknowledge the effort.

While she acknowledged her own career interruptions and pay cuts during Barack Obama’s time in office—still managing to work as a lawyer, run a nonprofit, author books, and raise “really sane kids”—her advice leans heavily on long-life expectancy (“if you live until you’re 80, 90, there’s so much time”) as justification for never fully stepping back. This overlooks the deep fulfillment many women find in dedicated motherhood, instead painting it as a risky path to irrelevance and resentment toward one’s own children.

“Hey, look, if you live until you’re 80, 90, there’s so much time. And I tell people, look, I had to get off a track and take pay cuts and come back, sacrifice, ’cause my husband was president … But in the midst of that, I still manage to be a lawyer, run a nonprofit … be an author … raise really sane kids who, you know, aren’t perfect, but they’re really, really good,” she said. “So there is time, but we have to give ourselves a lot more grace in the process.”

The subtle jab at children as self-absorbed ingrates—”They’re like, ‘I remember you. I don’t need you anymore,’ right?”—rings particularly harsh, especially given her platform and the scrutiny her own family has faced.

True Fulfillment Comes from Family Choices, Not Elite Careerism

While Obama urges women to “keep something for yourself” and maintain career momentum, her remarks subtly undermine the millions of mothers who choose to pause or scale back professional lives for the irreplaceable role of raising the next generation.

Many find profound purpose and lasting bonds in that devotion—bonds that endure beyond childhood independence—rather than viewing it as a sacrifice wasted on “ungrateful” kids.

Her advice, rooted in personal experience under extraordinary circumstances, feels more like projection than universal wisdom, reinforcing a career-first mindset that devalues homemaking and full-time parenting. In an era when families face mounting pressures, a more balanced message—one that honors all valid paths for women—would serve far better than one that casts doubt on the gratitude and legacy of dedicated mothers.

Don Lemon is humiliated after he made this braindead statement on camera

Prudent Politics
-
0
Don Lemon is humiliated after he made this braindead statement on camera

Lemon is trying to claw back his relevance. But this isn’t the attention he wants.

Because Don Lemon is humiliated after he made this braindead statement on camera.

Lemon’s Inflammatory Accusations Target Harassed Churchgoers

Former CNN anchor Don Lemon, who was embedded with anti-ICE protesters during their disruption of a Sunday service at Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, has drawn criticism for his sharp comments on the parishioners.

In an interview with the “I’ve Had It” podcast, Lemon accused the church members of entitlement rooted in white supremacy, stating: “I think people who are in religious groups like that — it’s not the type of Christianity that I practice — but I think they’re entitled, and that entitlement comes from white supremacy.” He added: “They think this country was built for them, that it’s a Christian country.”

The incident involved protesters storming the sanctuary, chanting slogans, and confronting attendees over claims that a pastor had ties to ICE.

Lemon livestreamed parts of the event and later interviewed Pastor Jonathan Parnell. Video evidence reportedly showed Lemon had prior knowledge of the group’s plans, despite his claims of journalistic detachment.

DOJ Scrutiny and Lemon’s Defense

The Department of Justice, through Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon for Civil Rights, announced an investigation into potential violations of the federal FACE Act related to desecrating a house of worship and interfering with Christian worshippers.

Lemon responded to the scrutiny by calling it an intimidation tactic, saying: “I said I don’t understand how I became the face of it when I was a journalist. I do understand that… I’m the biggest name there.”

He attributed the focus on him to his identity, quoting a staffer: “Don, you’re a gay black man in America, and you have a platform. And you’re the biggest name. Of course you’re going to be the person they single out… And they’re gonna make the headline because it plays to their base. And their base is full of racist, bigoted homophobes.”

Broader Context of the Disruption

The protest tied into ongoing anti-ICE demonstrations in the Twin Cities, following the January 7 fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good during an encounter with an ICE agent.

Protesters targeted the church based on allegations linking a pastor to immigration enforcement.

Lemon’s participation and subsequent framing of the churchgoers as problematic have fueled backlash, with critics arguing his rhetoric shifts blame from the disruption to the victims of the harassment while he dismisses accountability concerns.

123...176Page 1 of 176

2024 Copyright © All rights reserved.

Quick Links

Must Read

Popular Articles