Home Blog

CNN does the unthinkable and slaps Democrats with this explosive critique

0

CNN is usually trying to promote the Left. But not this time.

As CNN does the unthinkable and slaps Democrats with this explosive critique.

As the 2028 presidential race starts to heat up, even liberal media outlets like CNN are admitting the ugly truth about the Democrats’ lineup. Chief data analyst Harry Enten didn’t mince words when he tore into the party’s potential candidates, labeling the whole bunch a chaotic disaster. It’s a refreshing dose of honesty from inside the beltway echo chamber, exposing just how weak and disorganized the left has become after their recent electoral drubbings.

Enten appeared on CNN with anchor John Berman, timing his takedown perfectly as California Governor Gavin Newsom’s new memoir dropped. Newsom, long hyped as a top contender, came under fire from Enten, who pointed out the governor’s slipping traction. This isn’t just gossip—it’s backed by hard numbers showing the Democrats scrambling without a real star to rally around.

Diving into the polls, Enten laid out a picture of pure disarray. No one Democrat stands head and shoulders above the rest, with early surveys revealing a tight, uninspiring pack. This lack of a dominant figure spells trouble for a party that prides itself on unity and progressive momentum, but now looks more like a sideshow.

“Yeah, they’re all running and this is just a downright clown car at this point on the Democratic side,” Enten stated.

He highlighted how Newsom edges out former Vice President Kamala Harris by a razor-thin margin—19% to 18%. That slim lead falls within the poll’s margin of error, making it anyone’s guess who pulls ahead.

Enten didn’t stop there, calling out Harris’s dismal showing. “Quite a weak number for [Harris], given that, of course, she was the nominee last time around,” he said. After her failed White House bid, you’d think she’d command more loyalty, but the numbers tell a different story—one of fading relevance and voter fatigue.

Then there’s the rest of the field, including names like former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg at 13% and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez at 12%. These figures barely register as impressive, suggesting the Democrats’ bench is stocked with also-rans rather than heavy hitters. It’s a far cry from the powerhouse teams conservatives have built in recent cycles.

Wrapping up his brutal assessment, Enten hammered home the mess. “This is just a total clown car. It is a total mess. There is no clear frontrunner at this particular point on the Democratic side. Who the heck knows who the nominee is going to be in two years?” he stated.

Enten pointed to history for context, noting how rare this situation is for Democrats:

“It was been a long time, this is very unusual for the Democratic side to not have a clear frontrunner at this point.”

“You have to go all the way back, all the way back from when I wasn’t even in elementary school yet, not even in pre-K yet, to 1992, that was the last cycle in which there was no clear frontrunner at this point. Very unusual.”

Shifting focus to Newsom, Enten zeroed in on the governor’s downward spiral. Even with his memoir hitting bookstores, aimed at boosting his national profile, the data shows him losing steam. This is the guy California liberals love to tout as their golden boy, but the facade is cracking under scrutiny.

“It seems to me that Gavin Newsom is flailing a little bit, at least compared to where he was prior,” Enten said.

Enten broke it down further: “Three months ago, according to the prediction market, look at that, it was a 37% chance, now it’s just at 28%. Down he goes. He’s definitely flailing a little bit.” That drop isn’t minor—it’s a plunge that exposes vulnerabilities in a candidate once seen as inevitable.

Europe backstabs Donald Trump in an act with huge ramification

0

Trump doesn’t take lightly to traitors. And now he’s got a ton of them on his hands.

Because Europe backstabbed Donald Trump in an act with huge ramification.

The European Union, often criticized for its bureaucratic inertia and reluctance to commit, has abruptly hit the brakes on a major trade agreement with the United States, citing President Donald Trump’s firm warnings against exploiting recent court rulings—exposing what some see as the bloc’s fragility in the face of decisive American leadership.

EU’s Sudden Pause Amid Trade Uncertainty

Following the Supreme Court’s February 20, 2026, decision to invalidate many of Trump’s tariffs imposed via the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the EU announced a halt to the approval process for the Turnberry Deal, struck in July 2025.

Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament’s international trade committee, declared on social media, “Clarity & legal certainty are needed before any further steps can be taken,” adding that the agreement is “on hold until further notice!”

This knee-jerk reaction came as Trump rolled out a 10% global tariff on all imports effective February 25, with plans to escalate it to 15% once paperwork is finalized, highlighting the EU’s apparent discomfort with adapting to evolving U.S. policies aimed at protecting American interests.

Trump’s Stern Warning to Reluctant Partners

Trump took to Truth Social to caution against opportunistic maneuvers, posting: “Any Country that wants to ‘play games’ with the ridiculous supreme court (sic) decision, especially those that have ‘Ripped Off’ the U.S.A. for years, and even decades, will be met with a much higher Tariff, and worse, than that which they just recently agreed to.”

In a CNBC interview, Lange accused Trump of violating the deal’s terms, stating, “We wanted to have really stability and predictability. And unfortunately, the government, the president of the United States, has really made a breach of this deal several times. We need clarity, and this is also my clear request for the United States government — give us a certainty that for the next three years, we have no other irritations with new tariffs from the United States, and then we stick to the deal.”

Critics argue this demand for ironclad guarantees reflects the EU’s overreliance on favorable terms, ignoring historical imbalances that have long disadvantaged the U.S.

Broader Fallout from EU’s Hesitation

The Turnberry Deal promised a 15% baseline tariff on EU imports, alongside commitments for the bloc to buy $750 billion in American energy, invest $600 billion in the U.S., and purchase U.S. military gear—provisions that could boost American jobs but now hang in limbo due to the EU’s indecision.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s dissent warned that the ruling “could generate uncertainty” in trade pacts, a prophecy seemingly fulfilled as entities like FedEx sue for tariff refunds. This episode underscores how the EU’s cautious, committee-driven approach might prolong economic tensions, potentially allowing other global players to gain ground while the bloc dithers over perceived slights.

Trump turns his crosshairs on the Supreme Court in a major turn of events

0

The Supreme Court and the White House are never on great terms. And now Trump is making a bold demand.

Because Trump turned his crosshairs on the Supreme Court in a major turn of events.

President Donald Trump fired back at the Supreme Court following its recent blow to his tariff policies, warning that a similar misguided decision on his birthright citizenship executive order would hand a massive advantage to China and other nations exploiting America’s immigration system.

In a fiery Truth Social post, Trump highlighted how such rulings undermine U.S. strength while boosting foreign interests, underscoring his commitment to prioritizing American citizens and securing the nation’s future.

Trump’s Sharp Critique of Supreme Court Missteps

Amid fallout from the Court’s 6-3 ruling striking down key elements of his tariff agenda, Trump expressed frustration with the justices—except for the “Great Three” who supported his administration.

He posted on Truth Social: “The supreme court (will be using lower case letters for a while based on a complete lack of respect!) of the United States accidentally and unwittingly gave me, as President of the United States, far more powers and strength than I had prior to their ridiculous, dumb, and very internationally divisive ruling.”

Trump accused the Court of decisions that favor adversaries, stating: “Our incompetent supreme court did a great job for the wrong people, and for that they should be ashamed of themselves (but not the Great Three!). The next thing you know they will rule in favor of China and others, who are making an absolute fortune on Birthright Citizenship, by saying the 14th Amendment was NOT written to take care of the ‘babies of slaves,’ which it was as proven by the EXACT TIMING of its construction, filing, and ratification, which perfectly coincided with the END OF THE CIVIL WAR.”

He added: “How much better can you do than that? But this supreme court will find a way to come to the wrong conclusion, one that again will make China, and various other Nations, happy and rich. Let our supreme court keep making decisions that are so bad and deleterious to the future of our Nation – I have a job to do.”

This response showcases Trump’s unyielding resolve to push back against institutional hurdles that he sees as detrimental to American interests.

Restoring Integrity to the 14th Amendment

Trump’s executive order, signed on his first day back in the White House last year, aims to correct what his administration views as a long-standing misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment.

The amendment reads: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

The order would end automatic citizenship for children born in the U.S. to undocumented parents or those with temporary legal status, arguing that such individuals are not fully “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. This bold move breaks with over 150 years of precedent but aligns with Trump’s hard-line immigration stance, designed to prevent exploitation by foreign entities and ensure citizenship benefits true Americans first.

Safeguarding America Against Foreign Exploitation

As the Supreme Court prepares to review the order in the coming months, critics claim it threatens hundreds of thousands of children, including an estimated 4.4 million American-born kids living with an undocumented parent.

However, Trump’s warning emphasizes the bigger picture: allowing unchecked birthright citizenship enriches nations like China at America’s expense, draining resources and weakening national security. By challenging the status quo, Trump positions himself as the leader willing to make tough calls to protect U.S. sovereignty, even as opponents decry the policy as unconstitutional—highlighting the ongoing battle between innovative executive action and entrenched legal interpretations that favor global interests over domestic priorities.

Hakeem Jeffries believes the Trump admin has created this sinister scheme to harm U.S. citizens

0

Democrats are always coming up with crazy ideas. But this one might take the cake.

And Hakeem Jeffries believes the Trump admin has created this sinister scheme to harm U.S. citizens.

In a fiery appearance on “Fox News Sunday,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries launched a blistering assault on the Trump administration, claiming it’s misusing hard-earned taxpayer money in ways that harm everyday Americans. This kind of rhetoric from the left isn’t new, but it ramps up the divide in Washington, pitting progressive demands against the no-nonsense approach of enforcing our borders.

Jeffries didn’t hold back, tying the administration’s policies directly to tragic outcomes. He argued that funds from ordinary folks should focus on easing burdens, not causing pain. This comes amid ongoing debates over immigration enforcement and how ICE operates on the front lines.

Diving deeper, Jeffries referenced a specific case to hammer his point home. “Our basic value proposition is that taxpayer dollars should be used to make life more affordable for the American people, not to brutalize or k*ll them as was done with ICU VA nurse Alex Pretti.” That line draws a stark picture, but many on the right see it as overblown exaggeration aimed at demonizing law enforcement.

The Democrat leader pushed for sweeping overhauls to ICE, framing them as essential fixes to protect rights. He called for bold steps that would reshape how agents do their jobs, emphasizing constitutional safeguards. This push aligns with the left’s ongoing crusade to weaken border security under the guise of reform.

Elaborating on his vision, Jeffries outlined demands that sound reasonable on the surface but could handcuff ICE’s ability to tackle illegal immigration.

So we believe that this moment should be used to make dramatic changes to ICE that are bold, that are transformational and that are meaningful, that include lifting up the Fourth Amendment and ensuring that judicial warrants are actually required before ICE agents can break into the homes of the American people,” the congressman stated.

“We believe there should be independent investigations so that if ICE breaks the law, state and local authorities can investigate and prosecute them, as is the case with every other law enforcement agency in the country. We believe that sensitive locations like houses of worship, like hospitals, like schools and like polling sites should be protected.”

“These are basic, commonsense demands that have been laid out, and unfortunately, rather than dramatically reform ICE, the administration has decided to shut down FEMA, shut down the TSA and shut down the Coast Guard.”

Critics on the populist right argue that Jeffries’ proposals would turn ICE into a toothless bureaucracy, unable to swiftly deport threats to our communities. After all, protecting Americans means securing borders, not tying agents’ hands with endless red tape.

This isn’t just about one interview; it’s part of a larger pattern where Democrats portray Trump policies as tyrannical.

Jeffries’ mention of shutting down key agencies like FEMA and the Coast Guard twists the narrative. In reality, any disruptions stem from budget battles where Democrats refuse to fund border security without attaching their radical agendas.

Populists see this as hypocrisy: the left demands more spending on social programs while slashing support for the very forces that keep us safe. Trump’s focus on America First means prioritizing citizens over open-border fantasies.

The reference to Alex Pretti’s case stirs emotions, but details matter. Without full context, it’s easy for opponents to weaponize tragedies against the administration, overlooking the tough decisions in high-stakes enforcement.

Demanding warrants for every ICE action might sound fair, but in practice, it could let criminals slip away. Real commonsense means empowering agents to act decisively against those who break our laws.

Independent probes for ICE? That’s already standard for law enforcement, but Jeffries implies a double standard that doesn’t exist. This call reeks of selective outrage, aimed at eroding trust in federal protectors.

Protecting sensitive spots like churches and schools is fine, but not if it creates sanctuaries for illegals.

Jeffries’ overall stance fuels division, portraying the Trump team as villains while ignoring Democrat failures in cities plagued by crime and unchecked immigration.

President Trump set to unveil these secret files in a move that has everyone talking

0

Donald Trump wants transparency on this issue. He believes it will be crucial for the country.

And President Trump is set to unveil these secret files in a move that has everyone talking.

Folks, buckle up because President Donald Trump is shaking things up again, just like he always does. On Thursday, he dropped a bombshell on his Truth Social account, promising to rip open the government’s files on UFOs, aliens, and all that mysterious stuff in the skies. This isn’t some timid half-measure – it’s Trump going full throttle to give Americans the transparency we’ve been demanding for decades.

In his post, Trump laid it out clear as day:

“Based on the tremendous interest shown, I will be directing the Secretary of War, and other relevant Departments and Agencies, to begin the process of identifying and releasing Government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters.”

This move comes hot on the heels of Trump calling out former President Barack Obama for spilling the beans on aliens. Obama couldn’t keep his mouth shut in a podcast, and Trump wasn’t having it. It’s classic Trump – holding the elites accountable while they fumble around with classified secrets.

Trump didn’t mince words when he blasted Obama: “He gave classified information, he’s not supposed to be doing that.”

The president added, “I don’t know if they’re real or not, but I can tell you he gave classified information. He made a big mistake. He took it out of classified information. No, I don’t have an opinion on it. I never talk about it. A lot of people do. A lot of people believe it.”

Obama’s slip-up happened during a recent podcast where he boldly claimed that aliens are “real, but I haven’t seen them.” He even threw in a jab at the famous Area 51 rumors, saying there’s no hidden stash of extraterrestrials there.

To drive the point home, Obama said, “There’s no underground facility, unless there’s this enormous conspiracy, and they hid it from the president of the United States.”

Of course, Obama quickly backpedaled once the heat turned up. He tried to clarify, admitting he “saw no evidence” during his time in office that “extraterrestrials have made contact with us.” Typical politician – say something wild, then walk it back when called out.

In his follow-up, Obama shifted to safe ground: “I was trying to stick with the spirit of the speed round, but since it’s gotten attention let me clarify. Statistically, the universe is so vast that the odds are good there’s life out there.”

Trump’s announcement is a game-changer for patriots who’ve long suspected the government is hiding something big. While Obama dabbles in vague hints and retractions, Trump is stepping up to deliver real action. He’s directing agencies to dig deep and release it all – no more stonewalling from Washington insiders.

Think about it: for years, we’ve heard whispers about UFO sightings, strange lights in the sky, and military encounters with unidentified objects.

Trump’s push could finally pull back the curtain on what our pilots and radar operators have been dealing with.

This isn’t just about curiosity – it’s about national security. If there are advanced crafts buzzing our airspace, Americans deserve to know. Trump gets that, unlike the establishment types who prefer to keep us in the dark.

Senator John Fetterman breaks with the Democrat Party in a massive betrayal

0

Fetterman hasn’t been what the Left expected. And now it has come to a breaking point.

Because Senator John Fetterman broke with the Democrat Party in a massive betrayal.

Pennsylvania Democratic Sen. John Fetterman is emerging as a voice of reason within his party, challenging fellow Democrats on their resistance to straightforward voter ID measures by highlighting real-world successes in states like Wisconsin and Georgia.

Fetterman’s Pragmatic Stance on Voter ID

In a candid discussion, Fetterman emphasized that requiring basic identification to vote is far from extreme, pointing to overwhelming public support and practical outcomes.

He stated: “And now for me there’s other parts of SAVE Act that’s been problematic for Democrats, but for me as a Democrat, just fundamentally at the end of the day showing basic, basic, ID to vote is a very reasonable idea, and I think 84% of Americans in the last polling from Pew supports that and Wisconsin, a very, very purple state, just less than a year ago, they put that in their constitution and that was passed nearly by a two-to-one margin, too.”

Fetterman also noted: “I’m a Democrat that’s not going to freak out, you know,” underscoring his level-headed approach amid partisan debates.

Navigating the SAVE Act and Filibuster Dynamics

The House recently passed the SAVE America Act, which mandates proof of citizenship for voter registration and photo ID for voting, by a narrow 216-213 margin. Now in the Senate, it encounters strong Democratic pushback, but Fetterman calls for a more nuanced conversation.

He explained: “Well, there’s a lot to unpack in this about the Save Act and now, it’s not been a serious conversation because right now there’s not a Democratic co-sponsor for that, and that’s why, because that’s necessary because of the filibuster, and that’s also part of history to unpack.”

He added: “We as all the Democrats, we wanted to eliminate the filibuster. We called to eliminate the filibuster, and now we find ourselves that we love it now and that reminds people that the filibuster is important about bringing on the other parts of to have a conversation.”

His willingness to address these inconsistencies highlights his commitment to bipartisan dialogue.

Evidence from Key States and Broad Support

Fetterman drew on examples from Wisconsin and Georgia to demonstrate that voter ID laws haven’t hindered democratic processes or disenfranchised voters as some claim.

He remarked: “The world didn’t end. What happened in Wisconsin, and now in Georgia, for example, Georgia, which I think skews red, I think we’d agree, and after the law they elected two Democrat senators.”

Indeed, in Georgia, Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock secured reelection following new election integrity measures, while Wisconsin’s long-standing voter ID law didn’t prevent Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin from a narrow victory.

Polling shows strong backing for voter ID even among black voters and Democrats, with at least 70% in favor, countering fears of suppression and aligning with Fetterman’s sensible perspective.

Leftists are feeling betrayed after what this top Democrat announced

0

The Democrat Party is feeling the heat. Their top leaders are selling out.

And Leftists are feeling betrayed after what this top Democrat announced.

New York City is staring down the barrel of a potential property tax hike, courtesy of Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s latest budget bombshell. The Democrat leader rolled out a whopping $127 billion preliminary plan for the 2027 fiscal year, but he’s already sounding the alarm on higher costs for everyday homeowners.

At a Tuesday press conference, Mamdani laid it out plain: as the city’s top official, he has a “legal obligation to balance the budget,” and he vowed to “meet that obligation.” No ifs, ands, or buts about it—he’s determined to plug the holes, but the fixes he’s floating could hit regular folks hard.

Mamdani didn’t mince words about the mess he walked into. His team took over with a massive shortfall hanging over their heads, but through tough cuts, constant tweaks to revenue forecasts, and a bailout from Governor Kathy Hochul, they’ve slashed that gap “from an initial $12 billion to $5.4 billion.”

Still, that lingering $5.4 billion hole isn’t going away on its own. The mayor outlined a fork in the road for closing it, with one option targeting the ultra-wealthy and big businesses, and the other slamming property owners across the board.

“There are two paths to bridge this gap,” Mamdani declared. He pushed the first as the smarter, more equitable route: “The first is the most sustainable, and the fairest path. This is the path of ending the drain on our city, and raising taxes on the richest New Yorkers, and the most profitable corporations. The onus for resolving this crisis should not be placed on the backs of working and middle-class New Yorkers.”

He warned that ignoring this approach would just kick the can down the road. “If we do not fix this structural imbalance, and do not heed the calls of New Yorkers to raise taxes on the wealthy, this crisis will not disappear. It will simply return, year after year, forcing harder and harsher choices each time,” the mayor stated.

Failing to act on that, Mamdani said, leaves the city no choice but to take the painful alternative. “If we do not go down the first path, the city will be forced down a second, more harmful path. Faced with no other choice, the city would have to exercise the only revenue lever fully within our own control. We would have to raise property taxes. We would also be forced to raid our reserves.”

He labeled these fallback measures as “the options of last resort.”

Diving into the details of his preferred fix, Mamdani called for teaming up with state lawmakers to jack up personal income taxes by two percent on the roughly 33,000 high-rollers pulling in over a million bucks annually. On top of that, he’d hike rates on the biggest corporate earners to bring in the needed cash.

But if that doesn’t fly, brace for impact: a staggering 9.5 percent jump in property taxes. Mamdani admitted this would slam “working and middle-class New Yorkers who have a median income of $122,000,” turning their homes into yet another cash cow for City Hall.

The ripple effects? Massive. We’re talking hits to “over 3 million residential units and over 100,000 commercial buildings,” according to the mayor.

This isn’t the first time Mamdani has pointed fingers over the fiscal fiasco. Back in January, he pinned the blame squarely on his predecessor, fellow Democrat Eric Adams, for the original $12 billion black hole.

“There is a massive fiscal deficit in our city’s budget to the tune of at least $12 billion,” Mamdani charged then. “We did not arrive at this place by accident. This crisis has a name, and a chief architect.”

For hardworking New Yorkers tired of endless tax grabs, this latest pitch from City Hall smells like more of the same liberal playbook—promise to soak the rich, but end up dipping into everyone’s pockets when push comes to shove.

As the debate heats up, one thing’s crystal clear: if property taxes spike, it’s the average Joe footing the bill for years of big-spending policies that got us here in the first place. Time for real accountability, not just more hikes.

2028 presidential hopeful sinks her campaign before it even got started

0

We have years until the next election. But politicians are gearing up.

And now a 2028 presidential hopeful sank her campaign before it even got started.

AOC’s Misguided Mockery of Rubio’s Historical Facts

In a classic case of political overreach, Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez from New York tried to dunk on Secretary of State Marco Rubio by questioning his accurate remarks on the Spanish roots of American cowboy culture, only for her jab to highlight her own apparent oversight of basic history.

Rubio, speaking at the Munich Security Conference, celebrated Europe’s enduring influence on the U.S., pointing out that elements like horses, ranches, and rodeos trace back to Spanish origins—a fact backed by historical records of conquistadors bringing horses to the Americas.

Critics argue AOC’s attempt to stir controversy ignores these truths, coming across as more performative than informed.

Rubio’s Proud Nod to European Heritage Draws Ire

Rubio’s address framed the U.S. as “always be a child of Europe,” highlighting contributions from various European groups that shaped American identity. He noted the English foundations of colonies and legal systems, the Scots-Irish pioneers like Davy Crockett and Teddy Roosevelt, German impacts on the Midwest and even beer quality, and French explorers marking the Mississippi Valley.

Central to the speech was his emphasis on Spain’s role: “Our horses, our ranches, our rodeos – the entire romance of the cowboy archetype that became synonymous with the American West – these were born in Spain.”

“Our first colonies were built by English settlers, to whom we owe not just the language we speak but the whole of our political and legal system. Our frontiers were shaped by Scots-Irish – that proud, hearty clan from the hills of Ulster that gave us Davy Crockett and Mark Twain and Teddy Roosevelt and Neil Armstrong,” and “Our great midwestern heartland was built by German farmers and craftsmen who transformed empty plains into a global agricultural powerhouse – and by the way, dramatically upgraded the quality of American beer,” and “Our expansion into the interior followed the footsteps of French fur traders and explorers whose names, by the way, still adorn the street signs and towns’ names all across the Mississippi Valley.”

AOC’s Fact-Check Fail on Spanish Horses in Mexico

At a TEDx event in Berlin hosted by the Technical University, AOC dismissed Rubio’s comments as “a pure appeal to western culture,” zeroing in on the cowboy origins with a quip that backfired spectacularly.

“My favorite part was when [he said] that American cowboys came from Spain. And I believe the Mexicans and descendants of African enslaved peoples would like to have a word on that,” she said.

However, history confirms Rubio’s point: Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés introduced the first 16 horses to Mexico in 1519 during his Aztec campaign, later establishing breeding farms that spread horses and cattle ranching practices.

Indigenous groups adopted these through various means, influencing the cowboy traditions in regions like Texas and New Mexico. AOC’s insinuation that this erases Mexican or African contributions overlooks the documented Spanish introduction, making her critique seem like another instance of selective historical framing for political points.

Trump’s Border Czar goes scorched earth on these radical Leftists

0

The Left hates Trump’s immigration policies. But that isn’t stopping his administration from enforcing them.

And Trump’s Border Czar went scorched earth on these radical Leftists.

In a no-holds-barred appearance on CBS News’ Face the Nation this Sunday, Border Czar Tom Homan laid into the Democrats’ push for new restrictions on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) amid the heated battle over Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding. Homan didn’t mince words, calling out what he sees as outrageous attempts to hamstring the agents protecting our nation’s borders.

The showdown comes as the White House and Congress duke it out over how to keep DHS running smoothly. Democrats are piling on a list of conditions they want ICE to follow, but Homan made it clear that many of these ideas are dead on arrival.

Host Ed O’Keefe grilled Homan on the specifics, laying out the Democrats’ wishlist. “Among other things, they’d like to require immigration agents to show identification, wear body cameras, take off their masks, stop racial profiling, and seek judicial warrants to enter private property. Which, if any, of those asks is the president, are you willing to consider adopting?” O’Keefe stated.

Homan started by clarifying his role—he’s not directly in the negotiations loop. But he quickly dismantled the idea that ICE engages in racial profiling, insisting it’s a myth pushed by critics.

“When they say, ‘stop racial profiling,’ that’s just not occurring. ICE will detain, briefly detain, and question somebody based on reasonable suspicion — [it] has nothing to do with racial profiling,” Homan stated.

Shifting to the mask issue, Homan explained why agents need this protection in the line of duty. He pointed to skyrocketing dangers facing ICE officers, making it a matter of basic safety.

“As far as a mask … I don’t like the masks either, but because [assaults] against ICE officers are up over 1,500%, and threats are up over 8,000%, these men and women have to protect themselves,” Homan said.

On identification, Homan noted that agents already announce their agency affiliation, but they draw the line at personal names. He flipped the script, suggesting lawmakers focus on real solutions instead.

“Why don’t they talk about maybe passing legislation to make it illegal to dox agents or something like that,” Homan stated. “But the masks right now are for officer safety reasons.”

O’Keefe wasn’t letting up, comparing ICE to other law enforcement who operate without masks. “You know, cops go out every day, everywhere across the country,” he stated.

He inquired why ICE needs to “wear all that and protect themselves when there are others out there wearing badges that don’t have to do that?”

Homan hit back hard, highlighting the unique perils ICE faces in today’s climate. He argued that no other agency deals with the same level of hostility and personal attacks.

“I don’t know of another law enforcement agency in the country that has an 8,000% increase in threats. Just yesterday, the director of ICE, his wife was filmed walking to work, his home address has been doxed, his kids have been doxed and filmed,” the border czar said.

Tying it all together, Homan reminded everyone of the chaos that brought us here. He blasted the previous administration’s policies that he says turned the border into a free-for-all.

“And look, let’s remember why we’re here. We’re here because the last four years, over ten million illegal aliens crossed that border, released into this country unvetted. ICE has to do a law enforcement response to deal with the last four years of open borders, where they claim the border was secure every day and it wasn’t.”

This exchange exposes the deep divide in Washington, where Democrats seem more interested in tying ICE’s hands than securing the homeland. Homan’s stance resonates with Americans tired of seeing their border agents vilified while criminals slip through the cracks.

Hillary Clinton just had a mental breakdown on stage

0

Clinton has been in politics for decades. But she may finally have snapped.

Because Hillary Clinton just had a mental breakdown on stage.

At the Munich Security Conference in Germany over the weekend, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton found herself in a sharp exchange with Czech Deputy Prime Minister Petr Macinka, who pushed back against her repeated attacks on President Donald Trump’s policies.

The panel discussion on the state of the West quickly turned tense as Clinton launched into familiar criticisms of Trump’s approach to Europe and global alliances, while Macinka offered a more measured defense, framing the administration’s moves as a overdue correction to policies that had drifted too far from everyday concerns.

Clinton didn’t hold back, accusing Trump of undermining Western values, NATO unity, and support for Ukraine, even suggesting his style echoed unaccountable power.

She admitted migration had “gone too far” and needed humane fixes with secure borders, but doubled down on portraying Trump’s record as harmful to both the U.S. and the world.

Macinka, staying composed, pointed out the obvious: “First, I think you really don’t like him.”

Clinton shot back without hesitation: “You know, that is absolutely true. But not only do I not like him, but I don’t like what he’s actually doing to the United States and the world, and I think you should take a hard look at it if you think there is something good that will come of it.”

Clinton’s Interruptions Highlight Her Anti-Trump Fixation

The back-and-forth grew heated as Clinton repeatedly interrupted Macinka, mocked his points, and tried to talk over him—behavior that underscored her deep-seated animosity toward the president rather than engaging substantively with counterarguments.

Macinka calmly countered that Trump’s agenda represented a “reaction” to excesses like “woke” ideologies, gender theories, and cancel culture that had alienated regular people.

He challenged her directly on whether she truly believed positive outcomes could emerge from rejecting those shifts, putting Clinton on the defensive. At one point, Macinka noted he could tell his remarks were making her “nervous,” a subtle jab that highlighted how rattled she appeared when confronted with a European perspective that didn’t echo the standard Democratic line.

The clash also touched on immigration, where Clinton referenced higher deportations under Obama and her husband “without killing American citizens” or resorting to certain harsh measures—remarks that seemed aimed at contrasting past Democratic enforcement with Trump’s, though they landed amid her broader Trump-bashing.

European Pushback Exposes Limits of Clinton’s Critique

Macinka’s steady defense stood in contrast to Clinton’s more aggressive posture, offering a reminder that not all allies share the reflexive opposition to Trump’s “America First” priorities. His points resonated as a pragmatic take: Trump’s policies address real overreaches that had distanced governments from their citizens, including on cultural and border issues.

The exchange drew attention for showing cracks in the transatlantic consensus Clinton sought to portray as under siege solely by Trump.

While she warned of betrayal and corruption in dealings with adversaries like Russia, Macinka suggested a more balanced view—one that sees value in recalibrating after years of policies many Europeans and Americans alike have questioned.

Border Patrol leader caught harboring illegal immigrants in stunning turn of events

0

Everyone knows Democrats want illegal immigrants to stay. But now the betrayal is coming from within.

And Border Patrol leader caught harboring illegal immigrants in stunning turn of events.

A veteran U.S. Customs and Border Protection supervisor, Andres Wilkinson, finds himself in hot water after his arrest for allegedly sheltering an undocumented immigrant—who turned out to be his niece and romantic partner—in a case that underscores the vulnerabilities in immigration enforcement when personal entanglements cross the line.

Details of the Arrest and Relationship

Andres Wilkinson, 52, a long-time CBP agent since 2001 and promoted to supervisor in 2021, was taken into custody and charged with harboring an illegal immigrant. He appeared in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, securing release on a $75,000 bond.

The charges revolve around his involvement with Elva Edith Garcia-Vallejo, who overstayed her 2023 non-immigrant visa, rendering her presence in the U.S. unlawful—a situation that highlights the ongoing challenges of visa overstays contributing to illegal immigration.

Authorities allege Wilkinson assisted Garcia-Vallejo in navigating Border Patrol checkpoints while they cohabited. Surveillance from June to November 2025 at his Laredo, Texas, home confirmed Garcia-Vallejo and her minor daughter residing there.

The criminal complaint describes Wilkinson as Garcia-Vallejo’s “boyfriend,” but further investigation revealed a familial tie: she is his niece, with her father being Wilkinson’s brother. In an interview this month, Garcia-Vallejo admitted she had been “living with her uncle” since August 2024.

Allegations and Evidence

The complaint asserts that Wilkinson “was aware of her unlawful status in the United States” yet continued the relationship, providing her with financial aid such as credit cards, help with bills, and access to his vehicles.

This support allegedly enabled her to remain undetected, exacerbating concerns about how personal relationships can undermine border security efforts.

Prosecutors outlined: “Based on the above facts and circumstances, there is probable cause to believe that SCBPO Wilkinson brought in, harbored, concealed, transported, and shielded an alien from detection, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such entry, residence, or transportation would be in violation” of federal law.

If convicted, Wilkinson faces up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, reflecting the serious consequences for those who flout immigration rules from within the system.

Enforcement Context and Fallout

Wilkinson’s role involved overseeing customs and immigration law enforcement, making the allegations particularly ironic and a reminder of the need for stringent internal checks to prevent such breaches that erode public trust in border protection.

CBP has not yet commented on the matter.

This incident comes amid broader discussions on tightening controls to address illegal immigration, including visa overstays and familial harborings that strain resources and pose security risks.

Don Lemon faces his day in court for an inexcusable crime

0

Lemon has been a mainstay of the Left’s media machine for years. But his downfall has been swift.

Now Don Lemon faces his day in court for an inexcusable crime.

Former CNN anchor Don Lemon, now working as an independent journalist, is scheduled for arraignment in federal court in Minnesota on charges connected to his coverage of a disruptive anti-ICE protest inside a church.

Background on the Incident

The episode unfolded on January 18, 2026, at Cities Church, a Southern Baptist congregation in St. Paul, Minnesota, where the pastor serves as an ICE official.

Protesters entered during the service and began chanting slogans such as “ICE out” and “Justice for Renee Good,” referencing a woman fatally shot by federal officers the prior month amid the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement push.

The demonstration interrupted worship, prompting complaints from conservative religious figures and even some clergy critical of immigration policies who nonetheless viewed the tactics as inappropriate.

Lemon was present livestreaming the event and conducting interviews with attendees, protesters, and the pastor. He has maintained he was there strictly in a journalistic capacity, unaffiliated with the protest organizers.

Federal Charges and Legal Proceedings

Lemon faces federal civil rights violations under statutes protecting religious freedom at places of worship, including conspiracy to interfere with the exercise of First Amendment religious rights and related obstruction allegations.

These stem from the 1994 Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE Act) framework applied here, with potential penalties reaching up to one year in prison and fines up to $10,000 per count.

He is one of nine defendants indicted, with arraignments staggered; Lemon and four others, including civil rights attorney Nekima Levy Armstrong.

Lemon plans to plead not guilty, backed by a legal team that includes former federal prosecutor Joe Thompson, who resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in frustration over related immigration matters.

In a statement following his earlier arrest, Lemon declared: “I have spent my entire career covering the news. I will not stop now. In fact, there is no more important time than right now, this very moment for a free and independent media that shines a light on the truth and holds those in power accountable.”

Broader Implications and Reactions

The case has sparked debate over press freedom, with some arguing the charges risk chilling journalism in tense situations, while others—including the White House—frame it as necessary accountability.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt stated on social media: “President Trump will not tolerate the intimidation and harassment of Christians in their sacred places of worship.”

The incident ties into heightened tensions around federal immigration actions, including recent officer-involved shootings and enforcement raids.

While Lemon insists his role was reporting—not disruption—the prosecution portrays his presence and actions as contributing to the interference with congregants’ rights to worship undisturbed. The upcoming arraignment will mark the next step as pleas are entered and the case advances.