The Radical Left claims they are the party of “Democracy.” However, their recent actions have shown the truth.
And this landmark Supreme Court decision has completely unraveled our very Democracy.
In a move dripping with partisan poison, the Colorado Supreme Court yesterday dealt a stunning blow to democracy, disenfranchising millions and setting a dangerous precedent by disqualifying Donald Trump from appearing on the state’s 2024 presidential primary ballot.
This act of judicial activism, cloaked in the flimsy garb of legal reasoning, is nothing short of a political power play designed to silence millions of American voices and tilt the scales in the upcoming election.
The court’s rationale hinges on the Fourteenth Amendment’s disqualification clause, barring anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States” from holding federal office.
But this interpretation twists history and contorts legal precedent to fit a preordained narrative.
The events of January 6th, however, the Radical Left tries to paint them, were not an “insurrection” in any sense let alone the legal sense.
No evidence exists of Trump inciting or plotting violence, and attempts to equate a protest gone wrong with an armed rebellion are demonstrably false.
The Radical Left has celebrated the BLM riots of 2020 as “peaceful protests”, but have been quick to label the events of January 6th as an “insurrection.”
Furthermore, the court’s decision ignores the fundamental principle of separation of powers.
The Constitution vests the authority to determine voter eligibility with state legislatures, not activist judges.
This blatant overreach sets a dangerous precedent, empowering courts to hijack elections and silence dissent based on their own political biases.
The hypocrisy is as infuriating as it is transparent. Democrats have spent years crying wolf about “election interference” and “Russian collusion,” yet when a court decision actually threatens to silence voters, they celebrate it as a victory for democracy.
This selective outrage is a testament to their true agenda: to maintain their grip on power by any means necessary, even if it means disenfranchising millions of Americans who hold different political beliefs.
The implications of this decision are far-reaching. It sends a chilling message that free speech and the right to participate in the democratic process are no longer safe.
If the courts can arbitrarily disenfranchise one candidate based on their interpretation of a contested event, who’s next?
This sets a dangerous precedent for future elections, where judges, not voters, will decide who gets to run and who gets to choose.
The American people deserve better. We deserve a fair and transparent election process where our voices are heard, regardless of our political affiliation.
The Colorado Supreme Court’s decision is an affront to democracy and a blatant act of political bias.
It is a stark reminder that the fight for freedom and fair elections is far from over.
Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.
