Legacy media prove their shocking Radical Left connections after this bizarre incident

The mainstream media seems to be controlled by Radical liberals. But up until now, there hasn’t been very much proof.

But now, the legacy media have proved their shocking Radical left connections after this bizarre incident.

In an unprecedented display of media coordination, legacy media outlets CNN and MSNBC have collectively referred to the Trump-Vance presidential ticket as “weird” over 300 times in a single day.

This concerted effort, seemingly designed to undermine the credibility of the Republican ticket, marks a significant shift in the media narrative, reflecting the new messaging strategy of the Democratic Party and liberal pundits.

According to a comprehensive analysis conducted by the Daily Caller News Foundation, both CNN and MSNBC focused intensely on this new talking point on Monday alone.

MSNBC led the charge, using the term “weird” in reference to either Trump or Vance 179 times across various segments. CNN was close behind, with 170 mentions of the term during their broadcasts.

The term “weird” gained traction after Democratic Governor Tim Walz of Minnesota introduced it on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” During his appearance, Walz described the Trump-Vance ticket as “weird,” a label that quickly became a focal point for the media’s coverage.

This coordinated effort by the legacy media highlights their apparent alignment with Democratic messaging, raising questions about journalistic integrity and bias.

MSNBC’s coverage was particularly intense, with hosts and guests repeatedly using the term. Former Biden White House press secretary Jen Psaki contributed to the narrative during her show, “Inside with Jen Psaki,” while “Morning Joe” hosts used the term 32 times in a single segment.

John Lemire, an MSNBC host, emphasized the point by stating, “You know, I think that my colleagues are pointing out the obvious. That the agenda, the way they talk to people, the way they address people, it is bizarre. It’s weird. It is weird.”

Similarly, CNN’s coverage featured frequent mentions of the term “weird” in relation to Trump and Vance. Representative Eric Swalwell (D-CA) added to the narrative on CNN, remarking, “I don’t think Kamala Harris is going to pick anyone as weird and creepy as JD Vance.”

The legacy media’s adoption of this new talking point appears to be part of a broader Democratic strategy as Vice President Kamala Harris takes the lead in campaigning against the Trump-Vance ticket. With President Biden’s age and health becoming increasingly scrutinized, Harris’s campaign has focused on framing the Republican ticket as out of touch and unconventional.

J.D. Vance, the Republican candidate for Vice President, has been a particular target for Democrats and their media allies. Since his selection as Trump’s running mate, old clips of Vance have resurfaced, providing fodder for media attacks.

In one such clip, Vance referred to many of the nation’s leaders as “childless cat ladies” who are “miserable at their own lives.” This comment has been seized upon by Democrats, who have used it to bolster their “weird” narrative.

The media’s relentless use of the term “weird” raises significant questions about the role of journalism in political discourse. Rather than providing balanced coverage, legacy media outlets appear to be participating in a coordinated campaign to discredit the Trump-Vance ticket.

This strategy not only undermines the credibility of the media but also contributes to the growing polarization of the American political landscape.

As the 2024 presidential campaign intensifies, it is crucial for media outlets to maintain their integrity and provide fair and balanced coverage.

The coordinated effort to label the Trump-Vance ticket as “weird” highlights a troubling trend of media bias and underscores the need for greater accountability in journalism.

The American public deserves a media landscape that prioritizes truth and objectivity over partisan talking points.

As viewers and readers, we must remain vigilant and critical of the information presented to us, ensuring that we are informed by facts rather than manipulated by coordinated narratives.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics where we bring you the TRUTH in the news.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Hot Topics

Related Articles