After Biden’s decision to drop out, many people have questioned his endorsement of Harris. But no one was ready for this news.
And a popular news host has made a shocking Harris prediction that has stunned the nation.
In a recent episode of “The Megyn Kelly Show,” journalist and commentator Megyn Kelly delivered a scathing critique of Vice President Kamala Harris’ potential bid for the presidency.
“I am telling you, America is not going to elect this nimrod as its first female president,” she said. “I trust in them too much for that. They’re not that dumb.”
Kelly’s comments underscore a broader skepticism among Americans regarding Harris’ qualifications and appeal. As the 2024 election cycle heats up, these critiques are becoming increasingly relevant.
Kelly’s pointed remarks about Harris being unfit for the highest office in the land add to the mounting pressure and scrutiny Harris faces within her own party and from the American public.
Kelly’s criticism of Harris is multifaceted, touching on issues of competence, public perception, and the strategic positioning of the Democratic Party.
During her show, Kelly expressed doubt that Americans would support Harris as a presidential candidate, stating bluntly, “America is not going to elect this nimrod.” This harsh assessment reflects a widespread conservative view that Harris lacks the necessary attributes to lead the nation.
One of the primary points of contention is Harris’ public speaking and perceived authenticity. Kelly and her guests highlighted several instances where Harris’ performances have fallen flat, such as her awkward laugh and use of forced, inauthentic language.
For example, during a recent appearance on “The Drew Barrymore Show,” Harris’ attempt to discuss her laugh and its familial origins came off as contrived, further fueling conservative skepticism about her genuine connection with the public.
Kelly’s critique is supported by various anecdotes illustrating Harris’ perceived shortcomings. In one instance, Harris dropped an F-bomb during a speech at the Asian Pacific American Institute for Congressional Studies Legislative Leadership summit, a move that Kelly and her guest Dan Bongino criticized as a transparent attempt to appear relatable to younger voters.
Bongino labeled the profanity as “phony and cringe,” arguing that it exemplified Harris’ struggle to connect authentically with her audience (Megyn Kelly).
Kelly also dissected Harris’ repeated use of scripted lines, such as during an interview with ABC News where Harris repeatedly emphasized the need to “earn the reelect” and communicate their achievements. This robotic repetition, Kelly argued, makes Harris appear disingenuous and unprepared to speak off-the-cuff.
Harris’ political career has been marked by certain milestones, including serving as the Attorney General of California and a U.S. Senator before becoming Vice President.
Despite these achievements, her approval ratings have consistently lagged behind those of her predecessors. Conservative commentators like Kelly argue that these low ratings are indicative of deeper issues related to Harris’ competence and public appeal.
Harris’ tenure as Vice President has not been without controversy. Her handling of the southern border crisis has been a particular point of contention. During an infamous interview, when asked about visiting the border, Harris responded awkwardly, “I haven’t been to Europe either,” a remark that drew widespread criticism and was seen as a sign of her inability to handle tough questions effectively.
The discussion around Harris’ potential candidacy is occurring against the backdrop of President Joe Biden’s decision to not seek reelection.
Some Democrats have floated the idea of Harris stepping in as the party’s nominee, a suggestion that has been met with resistance from within the party and skepticism from the public. Kelly and her guests argue that Harris’ track record and public persona are liabilities that the Democratic Party cannot afford in a high-stakes election.
Kelly noted that Harris’ tendency to laugh inappropriately during serious discussions further undermines her credibility. In a recent interview with Drew Barrymore, Harris awkwardly laughed while discussing her style of laughing, which only served to reinforce the perception that she is out of touch and not serious enough for the presidency.
While Kelly’s remarks are undoubtedly critical, they reflect a broader conservative viewpoint that questions Harris’ readiness for the presidency. This perspective emphasizes the need for a candidate who can inspire confidence and demonstrate clear leadership qualities, qualities that Kelly and others argue Harris lacks.
Kelly’s criticism is not isolated; it echoes a growing sentiment among conservatives and even some Democrats that Harris is not the right candidate to lead the party in 2024. This skepticism is bolstered by Harris’ struggle to maintain a stable communications team, as highlighted by multiple staff resignations due to frustrations over her speaking style and public messaging.
As the 2024 election approaches, the debate over Kamala Harris’ potential candidacy will likely intensify. Kelly’s pointed critique highlights the significant hurdles Harris faces in convincing both her party and the electorate that she is the right choice to lead the country. Whether or not Harris can overcome these challenges remains to be seen, but for now, figures like Megyn Kelly remain decidedly unconvinced.
Megyn Kelly’s analysis on Harris’ potential candidacy paints a picture of a vice president struggling to find her footing and connect with the American public. From awkward public speaking moments to perceived inauthenticity, Harris faces an uphill battle in her quest for the presidency.
This perspective, as articulated by Kelly, underscores a belief that America deserves a leader who is articulate, genuine, and prepared to handle the challenges of the office. Harris, according to Kelly, does not meet these criteria.
Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.
