The rot runs deep in Washington, D.C. But it’s worse than many thought.

And now we know taxpayer dollars are being funneled for a sinister purpose you won’t believe.

Exposing Media Bias at PBS

A revealing study by the Media Research Center (MRC), released Tuesday, uncovered a stark 93% negative bias against Republicans and the Trump administration on the taxpayer-funded PBS program “Washington Week with The Atlantic” over the past three months.

Despite its claim of delivering “objective” political coverage, the program consistently skewed its narrative, dedicating 83 minutes to discussing Republicans—primarily President Trump and his administration—with 77 minutes of negative commentary and just six minutes positive.

The study, analyzing 13 episodes from April to June 2025, highlights a troubling departure from the balanced reporting PBS is mandated to provide, raising questions about the use of the $445 million in annual taxpayer funding through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

Undermining Trump’s Achievements

The MRC report exposes how even President Trump’s clear successes, like the decisive strike on Iran’s nuclear program, were met with 82% unfavorable coverage on the program.

Trump’s immigration policies, a cornerstone of his administration’s border security advancements, faced unrelenting 100% negative coverage, ignoring significant progress in this area.

Moderator Jeffrey Goldberg set an anti-Trump tone from the start, with introductions like:

“Most presidents wait until they leave the White House to cash in. President Trump takes a different approach. Crypto deals, hotels, golf courses, 747s, everything is on the table.”

The panel, dominated by left-leaning outlets like The New York Times, which sent six reporters, included only one representative from a non-liberal outlet, The Dispatch, who echoed the harsh anti-Trump sentiment, further skewing the discourse.

Failing the Taxpayer Mandate

PBS’s congressional charter demands “strict adherence to objectivity and balance,” yet the MRC study argues this standard is grossly unmet.

Inflammatory remarks from panelists, such as PBS News Hour’s Laura Barron-Lopez claiming the administration “repeatedly emboldened extremists and used hate speech to talk about their political enemies” and that “normalizing the populace to political violence is a trait of authoritarianism,” underscore the program’s bias.

While Republican topics were heavily scrutinized, Democratic coverage was nearly nonexistent, with only 61 seconds outside a May 23 special episode on the Biden campaign exposé “Original Sin,” which detailed the cover-up of President Biden’s cognitive decline.

This imbalance betrays the trust of American taxpayers, who fund PBS regardless of political affiliation, and calls for greater accountability to ensure fair and balanced reporting.

The times are changing. And it’s happening quicker than you think.

Now the IRS reversed a decades-long rule that changes everything.

Championing Religious Freedom

On Monday, the IRS made a bold move to empower religious institutions by lifting a decades-old restriction, allowing places of worship to endorse political candidates without fear of losing their tax-exempt status.

This historic shift, driven by President Donald Trump’s commitment to religious liberty, settles a lawsuit from two Texas churches and a Christian broadcasters’ association.

The IRS, alongside the plaintiffs, urged a federal judge to ensure that the Trump administration and future administrations refrain from enforcing the outdated ban, as reported by the New York Times.

“Thus, communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through its usual channels of communication on matters of faith do not run afoul of the Johnson Amendment as properly interpreted,” the IRS stated in a joint court filing, framing endorsements as a private expression of faith.

Reforming the Johnson Amendment

The decision reinterprets the Johnson Amendment, a 1954 tax code provision that previously barred tax-exempt organizations, including churches and nonprofits, from endorsing or opposing political candidates.

Violating this rule once risked stripping institutions of their tax-exempt status, though enforcement was rare.

President Trump has long championed overturning this restriction, declaring in 2017 his intent to “totally destroy” the Johnson Amendment.

The IRS’s new stance aligns with Trump’s vision, ensuring religious groups can freely express their values without government overreach.

By clarifying that endorsements during religious services are private matters, the IRS strengthens the constitutional protections for faith communities, a move celebrated by supporters of religious freedom.

Balancing Liberty and Concerns

While this change marks a victory for religious liberty, the National Council of Nonprofits, representing 30,000 organizations, raised concerns about potential misuse.

Diane Yentel, the group’s president, warned that the move could allow political operatives to exploit nonprofit status for campaign finance advantages, stating, “not about religion or free speech, but about radically altering campaign finance laws.”

Despite these concerns, the policy shift reflects Trump’s broader agenda to prioritize free speech and religious expression, ensuring faith-based organizations can engage in political discourse without fear of punitive tax consequences.

America and China are gearing up for a showdown. And it isn’t going to be pretty.

Because China sent a list of demands to Trump that isn’t going to end well.

Setting Conditions for a Summit: China’s Taiwan Stance

A potential summit between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping hinges on delicate diplomatic negotiations, with China emphasizing U.S. policy on Taiwan as a critical factor.

According to Wu Xinbo, a Chinese official and advisor to the Foreign Ministry, any visit by Trump to China would require clarity on the U.S. stance toward Taiwan, highlighting the complexities of U.S.-China relations.

China’s Demands and Diplomatic Preparations

Wu Xinbo, dean of the Institute of International Studies at Fudan University, outlined Beijing’s expectations during a Beijing peace forum, stating:

“Trump has to clarify the U.S. position on this very important issue when he comes to China. Without that, I don’t think his visit will be successful.”

He stressed that Trump must affirm the U.S. does not support Taiwan’s formal independence, a position China views as non-negotiable given its claim over the island.

Wu also urged urgency in summit preparations, noting, “If we are going to make this happen, we need to make preparations as soon as possible, and time is running out.”

He proposed advancing discussions on trade, fentanyl, and diplomatic contacts, suggesting a meeting between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a neutral country to lay the groundwork.

Broader Context: Tensions and Opportunities

The prospect of a summit follows Trump’s Truth Social post last month, where he shared, “As Presidents of two Great Nations, this is something that we both look forward to doing,” after Xi invited him and First Lady Melania to China. Trump reciprocated with an invitation to Xi.

However, Taiwan remains a flashpoint, with China’s Foreign Ministry accusing the U.S. of supporting independence after a February 2025 State Department fact sheet revision, prompting large-scale military drills.

Spokesperson Mao Ning called the revision “another egregious example of the [United States’] intention of using Taiwan to contain China,” though the U.S. clarified it opposed unilateral changes to the status quo.

Wu’s call for progress on trade, fentanyl, and diplomatic ties aligns with Trump’s campaign pledges, including enforcing a $50 billion agriculture deal and pressing China on fentanyl trafficking, as he vowed, “President Trump has also said that Communist China will not invade Taiwan on his watch.”

Whether they want to admit it or not, the Left doesn’t care about securing the border. Now it’s not up to them

Because Tom Homan unveiled a massive overhaul at the Southern Border that left Democrats fuming.

Bolstering Border Security: Trump’s Ambitious Deportation Drive

Under President Donald Trump’s steadfast leadership, his administration’s “border czar,” Tom Homan, has unveiled an aggressive plan to ramp up Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations, targeting at least 7,000 illegal immigrant arrests daily—a figure more than double the current quota.

This bold initiative, empowered by the passage of the transformative One Big Beautiful Bill, underscores Trump’s unwavering commitment to reversing the open-border policies of the Biden era and restoring law and order to America’s immigration system.

With unprecedented budget increases and a clear mandate, the administration is poised to achieve historic success in securing the nation’s borders.

A Robust Response to Past Failures: Homan’s Call to Action

Speaking to reporters outside the White House on Monday, Homan emphasized the urgency of the expanded deportation campaign, stating:

“And for those that say 3,000 a day is too much, I want to remind them, do the math, we have to arrest 7,000 every single day for the remainder of this administration just to catch the ones Biden released into the nation.”

This resolute stance reflects the administration’s determination to address the surge of illegal immigrants released under the previous administration.

The One Big Beautiful Bill, signed into law by President Trump on July 4, allocates significant funding to hire 10,000 new ICE officers and double detention capacity, equipping the agency to execute this ambitious goal.

The bill’s passage has already “turbocharged” Trump’s deportation efforts, as Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told The Post, building on a remarkable 93% drop in border encounters and an 85% reduction in apprehensions since January 2025.

Empowering Enforcement: Trump’s Vision for a Secure America

The One Big Beautiful Bill, a nearly 900-page legislative triumph, has provided ICE with a massive budget boost, enabling the hiring of 10,000 additional officers and expanding detention facilities to accommodate the increased arrests.

White House adviser Stephen Miller’s push for 3,000 daily arrests has already strained existing capacity, prompting Homan’s call for an even more aggressive target to tackle the backlog left by Biden’s lax policies.

Starting with a quota of 1,800 arrests per day in January 2025, the administration raised expectations in May, and the new 7,000-arrest goal reflects Trump’s unrelenting focus on restoring order.

Coupled with a 93% plunge in border encounters, an 85% reduction in apprehensions, and zero releases under programs like CBP One and CHNV, these efforts highlight the administration’s extraordinary success in curbing illegal immigration and combating drug trafficking, with 1,029 pounds of fentanyl seized since Trump took office.

Trump and Musk have been at each other’s throats. But this is a watershed moment.

Because Elon Musk threw his hat in the ring with a third party announcement.

Shaking Up the System: Musk’s Risky Venture with the America Party

Elon Musk, the controversial tech billionaire and X platform owner, has launched a new political endeavor called the America Party, a move that threatens to fracture the unified Republican front that President Donald Trump has painstakingly built.

Announced on Saturday via X, Musk’s party claims to challenge a “corrupt” two-party system that he argues fails the American people.

However, his timing and approach raise concerns among conservatives who fear this third-party effort could siphon votes from the GOP, inadvertently empowering Democrats and undermining the momentum of Trump’s agenda, which recently culminated in the passage of a landmark legislative package.

A Divisive Poll: Musk’s Questionable Mandate for Change

The genesis of the America Party traces back to a July 4 poll Musk posted on X, asking whether voters sought “independence” from the two-party system, which he derisively labeled a “uniparty.”

Garnering over 1.2 million votes, with 65.4% favoring a new party, Musk proclaimed, “By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it.” He positioned the America Party as a solution to a system he claims is “bankrupting our country with waste & graft,” promising to restore democratic integrity.

Yet, the poll’s informal nature, open to non-American voters and susceptible to bots, casts doubt on its legitimacy as a mandate.

Critics argue that Musk’s initiative, while cloaked in populist rhetoric, risks diluting the conservative vote at a time when Trump’s leadership has galvanized the GOP, securing historic voter support and congressional majorities.

This move could jeopardize the party’s ability to maintain its dominance, especially as it builds on Trump’s recent legislative successes.

A Risky Gambit: Threatening Trump’s Republican Unity

Musk’s announcement follows closely on the heels of President Trump’s signing of a transformative $3.3 trillion bill, encompassing tax cuts, infrastructure investments, and stimulus measures—a legislative victory that has solidified GOP unity but drawn scrutiny from fiscal conservatives worried about rising deficits.

While Musk avoids directly referencing the bill, his critique of government spending suggests a broader dissatisfaction that could resonate with some Trump supporters. However, his decision to launch a third party, rather than work within the GOP to push for reform, has sparked alarm.

Commentators like Shawn Farash warn, “Your third party will disproportionately take votes from the right vs the left and give the left an easier path to power,” while Joey Mannarino advocates for strengthening the GOP from within.

Historical third-party efforts, such as Ross Perot’s 1992 campaign, which garnered 19% of the popular vote but no Electoral College wins, highlight the structural barriers Musk faces.

With Trump’s unprecedented success in unifying Republicans—evidenced by his record-breaking vote share and the GOP’s congressional control—Musk’s America Party risks being a divisive distraction, potentially weakening the conservative movement at a critical juncture.

The country is divided. There’s no telling where we all may end up.

And now US Supreme Court Justice Alito’s dire warning for America came to fruition.

Alito’s Warning Shapes Legal Battles Over Trump Policies

Justice Samuel Alito’s concurring opinion in Trump v. CASA has cast a shadow over ongoing lawsuits challenging President Donald Trump’s policies, as he highlighted a “potentially significant loophole” in the Supreme Court’s recent decision to limit universal injunctions.

Alito cautioned that class action lawsuits and state-led litigation could effectively bypass the court’s ruling, allowing judges to issue rulings with nationwide impact under different guises. He urged, “Federal courts should thus be vigilant against such potential abuses of these tools.”

This concern comes as district courts issue broad rulings, raising questions about judicial overreach and the balance between legal challenges and Trump’s agenda to strengthen border security and federal authority.

Class Action Loophole in Focus

In a significant ruling on Monday, June 30, 2025, Judge Randolph Moss, an Obama appointee in Washington, D.C., struck down Trump’s proclamation labeling the U.S. border situation an “invasion,” which restricted migrants’ ability to claim asylum.

Moss, citing the Administrative Procedure Act, “set aside” the policy, a decision functionally akin to a nationwide injunction.

The lawsuit, brought by over a dozen potential asylees, was certified as a class action applying to all potential asylees nationwide, prompting immediate pushback from the Trump administration.

Attorney General Pam Bondi called Moss a “rogue district court judge” who was “already trying to circumvent the Supreme Court’s recent ruling against nationwide injunctions.”

Alito’s warning in Trump v. CASA emphasized that such class actions must strictly adhere to Rule 23, stating, “District courts should not view today’s decision as an invitation to certify nationwide classes without scrupulous adherence to the rigors of Rule 23,” lest they revive universal injunctions as “nationwide class relief.”

State-Led Lawsuits and Judicial Scrutiny

Alito also flagged the potential for state-led lawsuits to undermine the Supreme Court’s ruling, noting that Democrat-led states have filed multiple challenges to Trump’s policies, including his immigration crackdowns.

He warned that granting statewide injunctions could exempt entire state populations from federal policies, giving states “every incentive to bring third-party suits on behalf of their residents to obtain a broader scope of equitable relief than any individual resident could procure in his own suit.”

Alito stressed that “left unchecked, the practice of reflexive state third-party standing will undermine today’s decision as a practical matter.”

As Trump’s administration, which has reduced illegal border crossings by 93.1% in June 2025, faces these legal battles, Alito’s call for rigorous judicial oversight underscores the need to balance policy enforcement with fair legal processes, ensuring courts do not overstep their authority.

House Republican demands Trump serve a third term after delivering a huge win

Trump is on a roll. And some people think it warrants drastic changes.

Now a House Republican demanded Trump serve a third term after delivering a huge win.

Trump Ally Pushes for Third Term and Mount Rushmore Honor

Representative Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.), a staunch supporter of President Donald Trump, called for the Republican leader to be eligible for a third presidential term and proposed adding his likeness to Mount Rushmore alongside George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln.

Speaking to Fox News Digital after the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Ogles said, “I was at the White House with President Trump for several hours yesterday and spent countless hours whipping votes with Speaker Johnson for the One Big Beautiful Bill. This historic legislation will unleash our economy and usher in a new golden age for America.”

He credited Trump’s leadership, stating, “Thanks to President Trump, we’re finally reversing the damage caused by Big Government and Democrat cronies. Wins like this are exactly why he deserves serious consideration for a third term—AND why so many believe he belongs on Mt. Rushmore.” Ogles’ remarks highlight the deep loyalty among some Republicans to Trump’s agenda.

Marathon Passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a sprawling 900-page legislative package advancing Trump’s priorities on taxes, immigration, defense, energy, and the national debt, narrowly passed the House on Thursday, July 3, 2025, after an intense marathon session.

The process began with a House Rules Committee meeting at 1:30 p.m. ET on Tuesday, extending nearly 12 hours into Wednesday morning.

Debate resumed at 9 a.m. Wednesday but faced delays as House GOP leaders, including Speaker Mike Johnson and Trump himself, worked behind closed doors to persuade skeptical Republicans.

Ogles played a visible role, engaging with holdouts and leadership during negotiations.

The bill’s passage marks a significant victory for Trump, reflecting his influence in rallying the GOP’s slim majority to push through a complex and divisive legislative package.

Bill Provisions and Partisan Divide

The legislation permanently extends the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s lowered income tax brackets, introduces temporary deductions eliminating taxes on tipped and overtime wages up to certain limits, and adds a new tax deduction for Americans over 65.

It also eliminates green energy tax credits from Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, which Republicans have criticized as the “Green New Scam.”

The bill allocates increased funding to national defense and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to support Trump’s immigration enforcement efforts, alongside raising the debt limit by $5 trillion to prevent a potential credit default this summer.

New work requirements for Medicaid and federal food assistance programs are also included. Democrats have criticized the bill as favoring wealthy taxpayers while reducing benefits for working-class families, highlighting a sharp partisan divide over its economic and social impacts.

We all knew the government wasn’t working like it should under Biden. But this is downright criminal.

Because Biden’s FBI covered up a massive election scandal and now there’s hell to pay.

FBI Suppressed 2020 Election Interference Probe

Newly released internal FBI documents, disclosed by Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) on Tuesday, reveal that the FBI halted an investigation into an alleged Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plot to interfere in the 2020 presidential election.

The scheme reportedly involved producing “tens of thousands” of fake driver’s licenses to facilitate fraudulent mail-in votes for Joe Biden.

The decision to bury the intelligence report from the FBI’s Albany, N.Y., field office, which was based on a credible confidential source, was driven by concerns that it contradicted then-Director Christopher Wray’s September 2020 congressional testimony denying evidence of coordinated national voter fraud.

The Trump administration’s commitment to transparency, as emphasized by current FBI Director Kash Patel, has brought this troubling suppression to light, reinforcing efforts to restore public trust in federal institutions.

Internal Dissent and Political Concerns

The Albany intelligence report, produced in summer 2020, was recalled after Wray’s testimony, prompting objections from an FBI analyst who expressed concern in an October 2020 email, stating:

“Most concerning to me, is stating the reporting would contradict with Director Wray’s testimony. I found this troubling because it implied to me that one of the reasons we aren’t putting this out is for a political reason, which goes directly against our organization’s mission to remain apolitical and simply state what we know.”

The analyst added, “I do not feel it is our job to assess whether or not our intelligence aligns with the Director.”

Despite a follow-up interview with the source, deemed “competent” and “authentic” by an Albany official, FBI headquarters, including deputy assistant director Nikki Floris, ordered the report’s suppression, a move Grassley criticized as “political decision-making” that undermined the FBI’s national security mission.

Restoring Accountability Under Trump

Grassley’s release of these documents, prompted by whistleblower disclosures, highlights the Trump administration’s push to address past failures within the FBI.

Current Director Kash Patel, responding to Grassley’s inquiries, stated on X last month, “In 2020, facts about CCP election interference were buried by FBI leadership for political convenience. Thanks to relentless oversight from @ChuckGrassley and the hard work of our FBI team, the truth is finally coming to light. We’re restoring trust—through transparency, not politics.”

The FBI confirmed to Grassley on June 27 that its China-focused foreign influence task force did not thoroughly investigate the allegations, despite corroborating evidence.

The world of politics can be dangerous. But this is beyond the pale.

Because a Congressional employee was gunned down in a heinous attack.

Tragic Shooting Claims Life of Congressional Intern

Eric Tarpinian-Jachym, a 21-year-old intern for Representative Ron Estes (R-Kansas), was fatally shot in Northwest Washington, D.C., on Monday, June 30, 2025, in an incident that highlights the persistent challenge of violent crime in the nation’s capital.

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and Estes’ office confirmed Tarpinian-Jachym’s death, noting he was an unintended victim caught in a targeted shooting near the Walter E. Washington Convention Center.

A rising senior at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, majoring in finance with a minor in political science, Tarpinian-Jachym was remembered by Estes for his “kind heart” and “cheerful smile,” reflecting the profound loss felt by his colleagues, family, and community.

Details of the Incident and Investigation

The shooting occurred around 10:28 p.m. at the intersection of 7th and M Streets, Northwest, when multiple suspects exited a vehicle and opened fire on a group, according to MPD.

Tarpinian-Jachym was found unconscious with gunshot wounds, alongside an adult female and a 16-year-old male, both of whom sustained non-life-threatening injuries and were treated at local hospitals.

Tarpinian-Jachym succumbed to his injuries on Tuesday, July 1. Police recovered the suspect vehicle but have made no arrests, offering a $25,000 reward for information leading to a conviction.

Investigators believe the attack was targeted, but Tarpinian-Jachym was not the intended victim, underscoring the indiscriminate nature of urban violence that can claim innocent lives.

Rising Violence in Washington, D.C.

Washington, D.C., has grappled with elevated violent crime rates in recent years, with 2023 marking a peak of 274 homicides, or 40.9 per 100,000 residents, making it the fourth most dangerous city in the U.S., behind New Orleans, St. Louis, and Detroit.

A House Budget Committee report described 2023 as the city’s worst crime wave in over two decades, citing 950 carjackings and 106 children shot, evoking comparisons to the 1990s crack epidemic.

Notable victims included Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar, carjacked at gunpoint in October 2023, and former Trump official Mike Gill, killed in February 2024.

While 2024 saw a 31% drop in homicides to 190 and a nearly 50% reduction in carjackings to 498, D.C.’s ranking as the fourth most dangerous city persisted, despite Mayor Muriel Bowser’s claims of progress through targeted policing and community initiatives.

Tarpinian-Jachym’s death, the 85th homicide of 2025, reflects ongoing concerns about public safety in the capital.

The gravy train has come to an end. And it’s ruffling some feathers.

Now Trump slashed aid to this foreign nation and they are steaming mad.

Trump Prioritizes U.S. Stockpiles in Ukraine Aid Pause

The Trump administration’s decision to pause certain weapons deliveries to Ukraine, announced amid a Pentagon review of dwindling U.S. military stockpiles, reflects a strategic focus on ensuring America’s readiness to deter global threats.

President Donald Trump, addressing Ukraine’s request for additional air defenses last week, indicated flexibility, stating, “We’re going to see if we can make some available.”

However, the move to halt shipments underscores a commitment to rebuilding U.S. military capacity, strained by years of extensive aid to Ukraine and other allies.

This decision aligns with Trump’s broader push for a diplomatic resolution to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, prioritizing American strength and security while navigating complex international dynamics.

Pentagon Addresses Depleted Reserves

Pentagon chief spokesman Sean Parnell, speaking Wednesday, declined to specify which munitions or systems were paused, citing operational security, but emphasized that the U.S. military remains capable of deterring adversaries, as demonstrated in recent operations against Iran.

The strain on stockpiles, exacerbated by Biden-era policies, was highlighted by Parnell, who noted, “I think that for a long time, four years under the Biden administration, we were giving away weapons and munitions without really thinking about how many we have.”

Support for Israel against Iranian missile attacks in 2024 and 2025, operations against Yemen’s Houthis, and the defense of Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar—described by Gen. Dan Caine as the “largest single Patriot engagement in the U.S. military”—have further stretched resources.

Adm. Samuel Paparo, in November 2024, acknowledged to Reuters that diversions to Ukraine and Israel were “eating into stocks,” impacting readiness in the Indo-Pacific, where China poses a significant challenge.

Balancing Diplomacy and Strength

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, testifying in June, affirmed the administration’s commitment to a peaceful resolution, stating the U.S. “is committed to peace in that conflict.”

While negotiations with Russia have stalled due to Moscow’s inflexible demands, Trump’s approach contrasts with the Biden administration’s emphasis on Ukraine’s battlefield victory.

The pause in aid, though controversial, aims to preserve U.S. military strength while pursuing diplomacy, as evidenced by Trump’s optimism about talks resuming soon after June 25.

Critics like former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bridget Brink argue the decision risks civilian lives, yet Russian spokesperson Dmitry Peskov’s claim that it brings their “special military operation” closer to success overlooks Trump’s broader strategy to pressure all parties toward a negotiated end.

Bongino has been a beloved face of the conservative movement for years. No one wants to see him like this.

But Dan Bongino broke down on Fox News with heart breaking news.

Bongino Embraces Duty Despite Personal Sacrifices

Dan Bongino, recently appointed FBI Deputy Director by President Donald Trump, appeared on “Fox & Friends” Thursday to discuss his challenging transition into the role and the FBI’s renewed focus on high-profile investigations, including a reopened probe into a 2023 White House cocaine incident from the Biden era.

Known for his tenure as a Secret Service agent and his influential conservative commentary, Bongino’s candid admission about the job’s toll on his family life has drawn attention, highlighting his commitment to serving the nation over personal comfort.

Tackling Challenges and Defending Patel

Bongino didn’t shy away from discussing the difficulties of his new role, particularly its impact on his family.

“The biggest lifestyle change is family-wise,” he said, noting that he accepted the position at Trump’s request despite the strain.

“It was a lot, and it’s been tough on the family. People ask all the time, ‘Do you like it?’ No. I don’t. But the president didn’t ask me to do this to like it.”

He recounted a poignant moment when a woman expressed missing his podcast, to which he replied, “I miss me too,” reflecting the personal cost of his behind-the-scenes work.

Defending Patel against critics who question his commitment, Bongino emphasized their relentless work ethic:

“If you think we’re there for tea and crumpets, well, I mean, Kash is there all day. He gets in at, like, 6 o’clock in the morning. He doesn’t leave until 7 at night.”

Personal Struggles and National Service

Bongino’s emotional remarks about his family life struck a chord, as he clarified the strain of being separated from his wife while stationed in Washington, D.C.

“I stare at these four walls all day in D.C., by myself, divorced from my wife — not divorced, but I mean separated, divorced — and it’s hard. I mean, we love each other, and it’s hard to be apart,” he said, quickly dispelling any misinterpretation while affirming his resilience.

“I’m not a victim. I’m not [former FBI Director James] Comey. It’s fine. I did this, and I’m proud that I did it.”

His resolve to tackle cases like the White House cocaine investigation, combined with his sacrifice, mirrors the Trump administration’s broader push to prioritize national security and public trust, as seen in recent successes like a 93.1% drop in illegal border crossings in June 2025.

America’s enemies will never stop until we’re on our knees. And now it’s getting ridiculous.

Because Chinese spies were arrested for recruiting US military personnel to do the unthinkable.

Justice Department Thwarts Chinese Espionage Plot

On Tuesday, the Justice Department announced the arrests of two Chinese nationals, Yuance Chen, 38, and Liren “Ryan” Lai, 39, for allegedly acting as agents of China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS) in a scheme to recruit U.S. military personnel to betray national interests.

Chen, a legal permanent resident in Oregon, and Lai, who entered the U.S. on a tourist visa in April, were apprehended by the FBI on June 27, 2025.

Charged with operating as unregistered foreign agents, their actions reflect a broader effort by the Trump administration to counter foreign espionage and safeguard American security.

Uncovering a Covert Recruitment Scheme

The criminal complaint details the pair’s collaboration with the MSS, China’s primary foreign intelligence agency, to target U.S. Navy personnel.

In January 2022, Chen and Lai facilitated a “dead-drop” operation, leaving a backpack with $10,000 in a Livermore, California, recreational facility locker as payment for sensitive national security information.

They also allegedly stole recruitment data from a Navy installation in Washington and a recruitment center in San Gabriel, California, with Chen transmitting the information to an MSS agent in China.

Attorney General Pam Bondi condemned the plot, stating, “This case underscores the Chinese government’s sustained and aggressive effort to infiltrate our military and undermine our national security from within.”

The arrests highlight the administration’s vigilance in exposing foreign operatives.

Robust Response to Protect National Interests

FBI Director Kash Patel emphasized the significance of the arrests, noting, “The FBI arrested two Chinese nationals who were allegedly attempting to recruit U.S. military service members on behalf of the PRC. The Chinese Communist Party thought they were getting away with their scheme to operate on U.S. soil, utilizing spy craft, like dead drops, to pay their sources.”

Chen’s meetings with MSS officers in April 2024 and March 2025 to discuss assignments and payments further illustrate the operation’s scope.

If convicted, Chen and Lai face up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

The Justice Department’s swift action, as Bondi affirmed, ensures that “we will expose foreign operatives, hold their agents to account, and protect the American people from covert threats,” reinforcing the administration’s commitment to national security.