The Radical Left hates America, that much is clear. However, they are now showing just how far they are willing to go to prove their hatred.

And a Democrat Governor sells out Americans to foreigners with one shocking act.

Democrat leaders and politicians always seem to target low-income areas when campaigning.

They claim to be the party of the people and try to receive votes by promising money, tax breaks, or other benefits for low-income families.

However, as typical, actions speak much louder than words.

And recent actions by a Democrat politician have proven that the Radical Left does not care about any Americans… even those in low-income housing.

In a low-income community in Boston, residents are outraged after the Democratic Massachusetts governor decided to use their rec center for housing illegal immigrants.

Residents were given less than 48 hours of notice before they were locked out of the Melnea A. Cass Recreational Complex.

The governor claimed it would be used for housing some of the illegal immigrants that have been flooding the state over the past year or so.

According to some, many of these illegal aliens have been sleeping in Logan Airport for months, and are now being moved to other locations.

A State Senator, Liz Miranda, commented on the matter and reported that the facility will apparently be receiving a half-a-million-dollar makeover to compensate for the situation.

She told the Boston Globe, “The outrage you’re seeing is valid. Roxbury has never gotten its fair share out of the city and the state. I’m hoping West Roxbury steps up, I’m hoping Wellesley steps up, other communities that have rich resources.”

In November of last year, all of the Massachusetts housing shelters will filled with 7,500 families currently in the system.

Many of these illegals are being housed in hospitals, churches, and apparently even in Logan Airport.

While many people feel sympathy for those who are having to sleep on the streets because of a lack of housing, residents in the area are furious.

One local Boston United Track and Cross Country organizer, Hassan Ahmed, claimed that the decision had left his program “homeless.”

He said, “We come in, and folks at the front desk were like, ‘Just to let you know, today’s your last day.’ We were told that our permit was revoked and we were out.”

Governor Healey claimed that the rec center would be reopened to the public by June, however many locals are not feeling confident.

Others highlight that even if they were reopened in June, many programs would be “homeless” for months.

“I don’t know what we’re going to do for a couple, three months. I’ll call universities, I’ll call other places.”

One former state Senator Dianne Wilkerson said, “The fact that they can’t tell us today that they have alternate sites for the programs they displaced is just despicable to me.”

The outrage is felt not only by the residents of the affected area but by Americans across the nation as once again the Radical Left puts illegal aliens before the lives of citizens and legal residents.

America deserves better.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Radical Left has been doing everything they can to hinder any impeachment proceedings against Biden. But now, things are getting crazy.

And a Biden impeachment development spells out certain doom for the election season.

Recently, the Radical Left has become obsessed with the legal process in America, and they have weaponized the justice system by going after all of their political opponents.

But now, when the same justice system is used to prosecute them for their crimes, they suddenly do not care about rules or laws anymore.

House committees have revealed that during their impeachment process into Joe Biden, the Biden White House is refusing to cooperate and is even actively disrupting the investigation.

Investigators and committee members have requested all drafts of Biden’s December 2015 speech during which he called for the firing of Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin.

The Ukrainian prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, was reportedly investigating corruption allegations regarding the company Burisma where Hunter Biden was a board member making $80,000 a month.

Joe Biden later bragged that he forced the then Ukrainian president, Poroshenko, to fire prosecutor Shokin or he would withhold funding from Ukraine.

🚨 BREAKING 🚨

The White House is REFUSING to hand over early drafts of President Biden’s 2015 Ukraine speech where he called for the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor, Viktor Shokin.

These drafts are important as it is believed, based on public reporting, that the then-VP… pic.twitter.com/HXuUkVGBAM

— Oversight Committee (@GOPoversight) January 31, 2024

A letter to White House counsel Edward Siskel reads, “For more than five months the White House has declined to authorize the production of these draft speeches to the Oversight Committee or to assert a valid privilege over them.”

The letter claims that the Oversight Committee had requested the release of these drafts as long ago as August 17, 2023.

The letter states that the Committee requested the National Archives and Records Administration and the “NARA was able to provide the White House with the full set of documents that cover this request.”

Since the letter was sent, “the White House has refused to permit NARA to provide the Oversight Committee with any documents related to the 2015 Ukraine speech delivered by then-Vice President Biden.”

The White House has extended the review period multiple times claiming that the”release of this material would be fairly extraordinary, as it may make public foreign affairs deliberations of the person who is now the sitting President and his advisors, and as such requires additional review and analysis”

It continues, “This extension will also give us time to explore appropriate accommodations with Chairman Comer so as to avoid the concerns mentioned above.”

All of this back and forth is merely the White House refusing to cooperate, and it proves that they are doing everything they can to hinder the investigation.

However, the proof is already there:

In an interview in August of 2023, Victor Shokin stated that he was indeed fired because of Joe Biden’s threat to withhold funding to Ukraine.

Biden himself has even bragged about the issue and in a September 2019 speech said, “if the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a b*tch, he got fired.”

The entire situation is absurd, and it proves that Joe Biden and the Radical Left are terrified of what would happen if the American people learned the entire truth.

They know that Biden will have no chance of taking office every again once the American people discover just how corrupt he truly is.

We deserve better than Crooked Joe and the Radical Left, and we must hold our elected officials accountable.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Radical Left says the most ridiculous things. But now they are taking things so far that even other countries have noticed.

And now, a foreign ambassador has called out a Democrat for their absurd lies.

While Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) may claim to champion diversity and inclusion, her recent remarks regarding Somalia have ignited a firestorm of criticism, particularly from the African nation of Somaliland.

In a public speech, Omar reportedly declared her “first allegiance” to Somalian interests and advocated for a controversial “Greater Somalia” ideology, raising eyebrows and causing deep offense across the Horn of Africa.

Somaliland’s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Rhoda Elmi, wasted no time in issuing a scathing rebuke.

In a strongly worded statement, Elmi labeled Omar’s words as “shocked and surprised,” “ethno-racist rhetoric,” and “regrettably unbecoming” of both her office and her constituents.

Elmi further accused Omar of lacking “basic facts” and reviving the “once-violent and dangerous” ideology of Greater Somalia, a historical concept that aimed to unite Somali-inhabited territories under one flag, often through conflict and instability.

The Minister’s statement went a step further, highlighting the hypocrisy of Omar’s position.

“Particularly bewildering,” Elmi wrote, “was her use of ethno-racist rhetoric, especially considering the similar racist attacks she endured not long ago for being ‘not American enough.’

Now, she takes a similar approach and accuses the entire Somaliland nation of ‘falsely claiming Somali identity.'”

This accusation resonates deeply within Somaliland, a territory that declared independence from Somalia in 1991 and has since established its own stable government, currency, and military.

Despite international non-recognition, Somaliland enjoys peaceful relations with many nations, including the United States, with whom it cooperates extensively in counter-terrorism and piracy efforts in the region.

Elmi’s statement poignantly highlighted this point, questioning Omar’s “ignorance” of the “US-Somaliland cooperation in the fight against terror and piracy.”

This stark reminder of Somaliland’s contributions to regional security adds further weight to the minister’s condemnation of Omar’s divisive rhetoric.

Omar’s defense, claiming her words were “slanted” by “propagandists,” rings hollow in the face of widespread condemnation.

Somalilanders, Somalis, and even fellow U.S. citizens have expressed outrage at her divisive message, questioning her commitment to unity and coexistence in a region already beset by complex political and historical tensions.

The United States’ official stance, recognizing Somalia’s sovereignty while maintaining cordial relations with Somaliland, adds another layer of complexity to the situation.

Omar’s vocal support for a “Greater Somalia” potentially contradicts this delicate diplomatic balance, raising concerns about U.S. intentions in the region.

Ultimately, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s recent remarks have opened a fresh rift in an already fragile region. Her embrace of an exclusionary “Greater Somalia” ideology stands in stark contrast to the ideals of unity and inclusivity she supposedly espouses.

Whether she chooses to address these concerns and clarify her stance remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: her reckless rhetoric has sowed discord and damaged trust at a time when peaceful regional cooperation is more crucial than ever.

The coming days and weeks will reveal whether Omar chooses to retract her offensive statements or double down on her divisive ideology.

Regardless of her next move, the damage has been done, and the echoes of “Greater Somalia” will linger long after the initial outrage subsides.

Only time will tell if Omar can bridge the divide she has so easily created, or if her words will continue to fuel regional tensions and hinder the prospects of lasting peace in the Horn of Africa.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

A number of Liberal politicians have been caught in disgusting scandals recently. But now, this situation is even worse.

And a Radical Liberal politician is under investigation for this disturbing reason.

Congresswoman Cori Bush, champion of defunding the police and ardent critic of law enforcement, finds herself embroiled in a scandal worthy of its own Netflix docu-series.

Amidst accusations of misusing campaign funds for personal security, Bush resorts to her playbook of deflection and victimhood, blaming “right-wing organizations” for a “baseless witch hunt.”

But with a Justice Department investigation looming and inconsistencies in her narrative, the question remains: is this smoke, or is there fire?

While Bush claims transparency and unwavering ethics, the public record tells a different story.

A watchdog group, the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT), filed an ethics complaint alleging irregularities in payments to her now-husband, Cortney Merritts, for security services.

The heart of the issue? Merritts was on the campaign payroll for $62,000 in 2022, a hefty sum for “security” provided by someone who wasn’t even Bush’s husband at the time.

Even more eyebrow-raising is the timing.

Merritts, whom Bush married in February 2023, was hired in 2022, raising questions about whether this was a legitimate security expense or a personal perk disguised as campaign spending.

The ethics complaint by FACT doesn’t mince words, suggesting the payments “may have been unnecessary or above fair market value because of her personal relationship with the payee.”

Bush’s response? Predictably, deflection. Calling it a “right-wing witch hunt,” she denies any wrongdoing and claims to hold her campaign “to the highest levels of transparency.”

However, transparency seems in short supply when you consider that her husband’s role as her security detail, and the subsequent high pay he received, went unreported until now.

The irony is thick enough to cut with a butter knife.

A representative who vociferously advocates defunding the police is now under investigation for potentially misusing campaign funds on personal security, employing her own husband no less. It’s a case of “do as I say, not as I do” that would make even the most ardent hypocrite blush.

While the Justice Department investigation unfolds, one thing is clear: Bush’s claims of transparency ring hollow.

The public deserves answers, not convenient scapegoating and victimhood narratives.

Until she addresses the allegations head-on and provides a thorough accounting of her campaign’s spending, the stench of impropriety will continue to linger.

This saga serves as a stark reminder that scrutiny should not be partisan.

Whether you’re a Democrat or a Republican, those entrusted with public office must be held accountable.

In the case of Cori Bush, the story is far from over.

The Justice Department’s investigation will hopefully shed light on the murky waters of campaign spending and family ties.

Until then, the public should remain vigilant and demand answers.

This isn’t a partisan issue; it’s about upholding the integrity of our democratic system and ensuring that those who represent us live up to the standards they themselves advocate for.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Even with the Radical Left bearing down on him from all sides, Trump has not stopped fighting. And there seem to be some glimmers of hope.

Because Trump has received a major legal win that could shift the entire election.

In a resounding rebuke to the Left’s desperate attempts to silence dissent, the Illinois State Board of Elections on Tuesday unanimously rejected a politically motivated challenge seeking to bar Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential ballot.

This brazen power grab, disguised as concerns about the 14th Amendment’s insurrection clause, was exposed for what it was:

…a transparent effort to deny American voters their rightful choice in the upcoming election.

The challenge, orchestrated by the self-proclaimed arbiters of “democracy” at Free Speech For People, rested on the shaky foundation of Trump’s actions on January 6th.

Their warped narrative, twisting legitimate political discourse into an “insurrection,” served as a convenient smokescreen for their true aim: disenfranchising conservative voters and tilting the scales towards their preferred socialist utopia.

Thankfully, the Illinois State Board of Elections, composed of a diverse body of eight individuals, saw through this charade.

Recognizing the flimsy legal basis for the challenge and their own limited jurisdiction, they wisely deferred to the courts to make the final determination on Trump’s eligibility.

This decision, a testament to their commitment to due process and the bedrock principles of American democracy, stands as a beacon of hope against the encroaching tide of tyranny.

“No place” is an understatement for the Illinois board’s stance on this sham challenge. As board member Catherine McCrory, a Republican, aptly stated, despite her personal conviction that Trump’s actions “manipulated, instigated, and abetted an insurrection,” it was “not our place to rule on that.”

This principled stand against judicial overreach and political manipulation deserves the highest praise.

While the immediate threat of disenfranchisement has been lifted, the Left’s war on democracy is far from over.

Similar challenges have been filed across the country, each a desperate attempt to silence the voice of millions of Americans who dare to disagree with their radical agenda.

And with the Supreme Court hearing looming on February 8th, the stakes have never been higher.

The Illinois decision, however, offers a glimpse of hope. It demonstrates that Americans, both Republican and Democrat, can still come together to uphold the fundamental principles of our republic.

It reminds us that due process, not partisan pandering, should guide our judicial system.

And it serves as a stark warning to those who seek to weaponize the law for their own political gain: the American people will not be silenced.

As Donald Trump rightfully celebrated the 8-0 vote as a victory for “the Citizens of our Country” against the “Radical Left Lunatics,” we must remain vigilant.

The forces of tyranny are still at work, seeking to undermine our elections and dismantle our cherished freedoms.

But as long as Americans stand united in defense of due process, free speech, and the right to choose their own leaders, the torch of liberty will continue to burn bright.

The Illinois battle may be over, but the war for the soul of our nation is far from won.

Let us stand shoulder-to-shoulder, conservatives and independents alike, to ensure that the voice of the American people rings loud and clear in the 2024 election and beyond.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more if the TRUTH in the news.

The White House is doing their best to cover up their lies. But sometimes, they accidentally slip up.

And now, Karine Jean Pierre’s massive mistake at a press conference sent Biden into rage.

The stench of hypocrisy hangs heavy over the border crisis, wafted in by President Biden’s latest flip-flop on border security.

Just weeks after defending the open borders policies he inherited from his predecessor, Biden has now floated the possibility of “shutting down the border” if a bipartisan deal is reached.

This sudden change of tune begs the question: is Biden’s version of border security kosher, while President Trump’s was deemed “racist” and “xenophobic”?

Let’s rewind to 2019.

When President Trump proposed similar measures, the chorus of condemnation from the left was deafening.

Accusations of racism and xenophobia echoed across the media landscape, with pundits tripping over themselves to denounce Trump’s “cruel” and “inhumane” border policies.

Terms like “wall-builder” and “Muslim ban” were brandished like scarlet letters, weaponized in an effort to paint Trump as a heartless bigot.

Fast forward to today, and the script has flipped.

Biden, uttering almost identical language, is praised for his “pragmatic” approach to the border crisis.

His proposed “shutdown” is met with cautious optimism, not scornful denunciation.

The once-toxic labels of “racist” and “xenophobe” seem to have vanished into thin air, replaced by murmurs of “bipartisanship” and “compromise.”

This blatant double standard exposes the left’s selective outrage and their cynical manipulation of language.

When a Republican advocates for border security, it’s branded as bigotry.

When a Democrat does the same, it’s suddenly statesmanship.

This political opportunism undermines any genuine conversation about securing our borders and protecting our citizens.

But let’s delve deeper than mere rhetorical hypocrisy.

Biden’s proposed “shutdown” remains shrouded in mystery.

The much-touted bipartisan deal exists only in nebulous whispers, its details hidden from public scrutiny.

How is this different from Trump’s proposals, which were also subject to intense criticism for lacking transparency?

It appears the selective amnesia plaguing the left extends to matters of accountability and due process.

The truth is, that the issue of border security transcends partisan squabbles and media narratives.

It’s about protecting our national sovereignty, ensuring the safety of our citizens, and upholding the rule of law.

These are not partisan considerations; they are fundamental American values that should not be bartered on the altar of political expediency.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The entire lawsuit with E. Jean Carroll was a disaster from the start. And many believe that it was nothing but a politically motivated witch hunt.

And now, E. Jean Carroll made a stunning confession on air right after Trump verdict.

If ever a story epitomized the chasm between liberal virtue signaling and genuine concern for social issues, it’s the saga of E. Jean Carroll’s $83 million payday from former President Donald Trump.

In a recent interview with Rachel Maddow, Carroll, the advice columnist who accused Trump of sexual assault in the iconic Bergdorf Goodman department store, unveiled her plans for her newfound fortune.

What emerged was a spectacle of grotesque self-indulgence, leaving one to wonder if women’s rights ever crossed her mind amidst the designer sprees and European fishing trips.

Forget tangible initiatives empowering women, forget shelters for victims escaping abuse, forget legal aid for those fighting genuine injustices.

Carroll’s vision of “shoring up women’s rights” resembled a Hollywood-level shopping spree, riddled with fantasies of new wardrobes, luxurious motorcycles for her lawyers, and penthouse apartments overlooking the Seine.

While Maddow, to her credit, attempted to steer the conversation towards meaningful action, Carroll’s eyes glazed over at mentions of “groundwork” and “advocacy.”

It was a masterclass in performative activism, a PR stunt gone wildly off the rails.

One couldn’t help but cringe at the audacity of it all.

Here was a woman whose claims against Trump have been met with skepticism and inconsistencies, whose lawsuit hinged on a civil court’s lower burden of proof, now flaunting millions like a trophy wife in a bad B-movie.

While true victims of assault grapple with trauma and legal hurdles, Carroll basked in the glow of her self-styled martyrdom, her “plight” conveniently translating into designer handbags and Parisian vacations.

But the dissonance goes deeper than petty materialism.

Carroll’s accusations, made at the height of Trump’s presidency and suspiciously timed with the release of her book, reeked of political opportunism.

The sudden spike in sales following the accusations – a textbook case of personal enrichment disguised as social justice – only reinforces the perception of a calculated cash grab.

Where was the empathy for genuine victims caught in the crossfire of partisan battles? Where was the outrage against weaponized accusations used as political cudgels?

Lost in the celebratory champagne toast of the left, lost in the deafening chants of “believe all women,” is the chilling effect such cases have on genuine victims.

When every accusation, regardless of evidence or logic, becomes a rallying cry for political agendas, the true fight for women’s rights gets drowned out by the cacophony of self-serving narratives.

E. Jean Carroll’s $83 million windfall isn’t a victory for women’s rights; it’s a monument to opportunistic exploitation.

It’s a gilded cage where empathy and accountability are sacrificed at the altar of personal gain, where the fight for justice becomes a lucrative brand, and where the cries of true victims are overshadowed by the clinking of champagne glasses.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

The situation at the southern border is getting worse by the day. And the government’s inaction has people infuriated.

But now, an alarming border report sends Washington, D.C. into total chaos.

As the southern border crisis spirals ever out of control, a familiar refrain echoed through Monday’s White House press briefing: legislative inaction.

When pressed on President Biden’s failure to utilize executive authority to curb the unprecedented flow of illegal immigration, National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby offered nothing but promises of future action, contingent on Congressional approval.

This, however, rings hollow for millions of Americans witnessing the daily erosion of national security and the systematic unraveling of border communities.

NPR’s Franco Ordonez rightfully challenged Kirby’s feeble excuse, “Why wait until Congress?”

The answer, it seems, lies in a game of political brinkmanship.

Biden, who wielded executive authority with surgical precision upon entering office to dismantle his predecessor’s border policies, now holds executive action hostage, demanding an extortionate ransom of additional funding and legislative green light before taking even the most basic steps to stem the tide.

Fox News’ Jacqui Heinrich aptly clarified, “Are you suggesting… that the President is withholding executive action on the border until he gets the money?”

Kirby’s mealy-mouthed response, “No, I’m not suggesting that,” only confirmed the suspicion.

This cynical ploy is a slap in the face to American citizens burdened by the consequences of Biden’s failed policies.

Bill Melugin’s stark reminder, “The same authority Biden used to reverse almost every Trump policy at the border” can be used to address the crisis, exposes the sheer hypocrisy.

Why are executive levers readily deployed to appease one agenda, yet rendered impotent when faced with the self-inflicted disaster at the southern border?

The answer is obvious: political expediency trumps national security.

The statistics paint a grim picture.

In 2023, Border Patrol apprehended over 2.4 million illegal immigrants, a figure steadily climbing from 1.7 million in 2021. December alone saw a record-breaking 302,000 encounters, with countless others slipping through undetected. These numbers represent more than just statistics; they represent lives thrown into disarray, communities overwhelmed, and national security compromised.

While Kirby boasts of 16 executive orders related to immigration, they amount to empty pronouncements devoid of meaningful action.

The administration’s “catch and release” policy incentivizes further illegal crossings while dismantling successful programs like “Remain in Mexico” creates a vacuum for exploitation by cartels and trafficking rings.

This is not a matter of partisanship; it’s a matter of national responsibility.

The Biden administration’s refusal to act decisively, its hostage-taking of executive authority, and its utter disregard for the human cost of its chaotic policies are an abdication of duty.

Americans deserve decisive leadership, not political gamesmanship. The border crisis demands immediate action, not empty promises and legislative quid pro quos.

Let us hope that the pressure of public scrutiny and the mounting human cost will finally compel the Biden administration to do its job and secure our borders, before the fabric of our nation unravels further.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for the TRUTH in the news.

The Radical Left hates America and they hate Americans. But now, what they are doing is horrifying.

And this Democrat assault on Americans is going as far as to steal children.

A Montana family is waging war against a “woke” state apparatus that ripped their 14-year-old daughter from their arms and shipped her north to Canada, all because they dared to stand up for their parental rights and refuse to rubber-stamp a radical gender transition agenda.

Krista and Todd Kolstad, the embattled parents, paint a chilling picture of a Kafkaesque nightmare orchestrated by Child and Family Services (CFS) and fueled by medical institutions pushing a dangerous ideology onto vulnerable children.

Their daughter, Jennifer, became the pawn in a game where parental authority was sacrificed at the altar of political correctness.

The ordeal began in August 2023 when Jennifer, then 13, was hospitalized after a school falsely claimed she tried to harm herself.

Toxicology reports proved the allegation a malicious lie, but that didn’t stop medical professionals from treating Jennifer like a transgender patient in waiting, bombarding her with information on “gender-affirming” surgery, including irreversible double mastectomy procedures.

Worse, despite the Kolstads’ clear objections, CFS intervened, sending Jennifer to a gender transition haven in Wyoming – a state notorious for its lax parental consent laws for such controversial medical interventions.

This maneuver reeked of deliberate circumvention of Montana’s more protective regulations, raising serious concerns about CFS’s allegiance to ideological agendas over parental rights.

Not surprisingly, the Kolstads refused to become cogs in this gender-bending machine.

Their principled stand cost them dearly.

In January, a judge, seemingly beholden to the same “woke” forces, ripped Jennifer from their arms and handed her over to CFS, citing the Kolstads’ refusal to endorse their daughter’s transition as the main reason.

This draconian decree was further weaponized by a contempt of court charge against the Kolstads for daring to speak out against this injustice.

Jennifer now languishes in Canada, placed with her biological mother, a woman with a strained relationship and, according to the Kolstads, a history of troubling behavior.

This final twist adds another layer of cruelty to an already agonizing ordeal.

The Kolstads’ story is a chilling harbinger of things to come, a stark warning to any parent who dares to challenge the “woke” medical and legal establishment’s increasingly coercive push to redefine childhood and parental authority.

Their fight is not just for Jennifer; it’s a battle cry for countless families facing similar threats across the nation.

As the Kolstads raise funds to navigate this legal labyrinth and reunite with their daughter, their case demands a national spotlight.

It’s time to hold accountable those who prioritize political agendas over the sacred bond between parent and child.

Jennifer’s stolen childhood serves as a stark reminder: if this can happen in Montana, nowhere is truly safe.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Joe Biden is a disgrace to this great nation. And every time he opens his mouth, all that comes out are jumbled thoughts.

And Biden had a massive malfunction on stage and now Democrats are petrified.

Joe Biden is so riddled with dementia that he cannot even form coherent sentences.

This has become a major problem especially because a large part of being the President is giving addresses and answering questions.

However, instead of a competent and strong leader, America is stuck with a complete and total disaster of a puppet, masquerading as America’s worst president ever.

Joe Biden’s newest slip-up has reminded the American people just how far gone he truly is.

Last Sunday, Joe Biden declared that Donald Trump was the current “sitting President.”

This blunder occurred during a speech in South Carolina, where many people called for answers regarding Joe Biden’s mental health.

The Radical Left continues to claim that Joe Biden is in perfect condition, however, it is obvious that this could not be further from the truth.

Someone who does not even realize they are the president, should not be holding the office of President of the United States.

Biden declares that Donald Trump is the “sitting president.” pic.twitter.com/QfzvlJoJXI

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) January 28, 2024

z

This slip came as Joe Biden attempted to make fun of Donald Trump regarding the state of the economy.

Biden said, “The American consumers are facing real confidence in the economy we’re building. Let me tell you who else is noticing that- Donald Trump.”

Following that opening statement, Joe Biden began to fumble over words and seemingly lose his mind.

Biden continued, “Did you see what he recently said about- he want’s to, he wants to see the economy crash this year? The sitting President.”

Biden went on further to say that Trump “knows” the US economy is “strong” and “getting stronger.”

Biden then tried to insult Trump by calling him a “loser,” but I think it is pretty clear who the real loser here is.

Even members of Biden’s own party have called him out for his absurd comments and his lies about the economy and the state of the nation.

Dean Phillips, who is running against Biden as a fellow Democrat, was quick to criticize the president and point out the facts of the situation.

I mean, come on folks. https://t.co/YCQkItPhIQ

— Dean Phillips (@deanbphillips) January 27, 2024

Phillips told reporters that Biden’s “physical and communication decline” is “self-evident.”

He continued by saying, “He’s a human being. But he’s an 81-year-old man.”

As more and more instances of Biden’s deteriorating (and maybe even nonexistent) mental health are seen, more people are calling for him to step down.

America deserves a leader who does not act the way that Biden does and we deserve a leader who can form a singular coherent sentence… at least.

But instead, we have an idiot who says things like this:

BIDEN: "Folks, if I were smart, I'd say thank you and leave" pic.twitter.com/qARfWj2YmT

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) January 28, 2024

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The election season is heating up, and people are saying things they regret. But no one expected this.

And Nikki Haley’s newest comments have exposed who she truly is.

It is normal for there to be tension among candidates during election season, however, everyone agrees that there is a line that should not be crossed.

Donald Trump is the top candidate (by a landslide) for the GOP primary, and with all other candidates dropping out, it is down to him, and Nikki Haley.

As more primaries approach, the sparks are starting to fly.

But now, Haley has made comments that many conservatives have deemed were too far.

During her recent “Meet the Press” interview on Sunday, Nikki Haley made comments targeting Donald Trump and his recent legal problems.

She specifically targeted Trump regarding his most recent legal loss where he was ordered to pay an extreme $83 million in damages.

The legal battle came after a suit from E. Jean Carroll where the jury claimed Trump “abused” Carroll.

Haley sided with the jury against Trump stating, “I think that they made their decision based on the evidence.”

Nikki Haley on the E. Jean Carroll case:

"I absolutely trust the jury, and I think that they made their decision based on the evidence. I just don't think that should take [Trump] off the ballot. I think the American people will take him off the ballot." pic.twitter.com/sdXHuNWRL3

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) January 28, 2024

She said, “I absolutely trust the jury, and I think that they made their decision based on the evidence. I just don’t think that should take [Trump] off the ballot. I think the American people will take him off the ballot.”

She took to twitter to further attack Trump and claim that Trump was not addressing any of the nation’s problems.

“Donald Trump wants to be the presumptive Republican nominee and we’re talking about $83 million in damages. We’re not talking about fixing the border. We’re not talking about tackling inflation. America can do better than Donald Trump and Joe Biden,” wrote Haley.

Donald Trump wants to be the presumptive Republican nominee and we’re talking about $83 million in damages. We’re not talking about fixing the border. We’re not talking about tackling inflation. America can do better than Donald Trump and Joe Biden.

— Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) January 26, 2024

Haley also said, “I do think that he surrounds himself in chaos, and we can’t be a country in disarray, and have a world on fire and be in chaos. I do think that these court cases are distracting not just to the American people but to him himself, which is keeping him from talking about what really matters. That’s exactly why I don’t think he should be president.”

One of Haley’s megadonors with a questionable history, also played a major part in funding the lawsuit by Carroll.

The entire lawsuit was questionable and even laughable at points.

Carroll initially claimed that she was assaulted in NYC in 1994, then changed the date and location multiple times.

Caroll also made numerous questionable remarks throughout the entire process, and at one point even labeled assault as “sexy.”

During an interview with Anderson Cooper, she stated, “I think most people think of r*pe as being sexy… think of the fantasies.”

The entire lawsuit was already highly outrageous, but the fact that the jury ruled that they did and that Nikki Haley took their side adds fuel to the fire.

Many Trump supporters see the former President’s legal battles as a “witch hunt” and say they are politically motivated.

The proof is certainly there yet the Radical Left refuses to admit anything is wrong.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Endorsements play a major part in every election campaign. And although many are not surprising, some are.

And Trump has just received an unexpected endorsement that has Democrats shocked and frustrated.

Snoop Dogg recently addressed the world, and his words are echoing far beyond the hazy confines of Hollywood Hills mansions.

In a recent interview, Snoop Dogg dropped a bombshell, expressing “nothing but love and respect” for former President Donald Trump.

This seismic shift in the rapper’s stance sent shockwaves through the left-leaning echo chamber he’s long inhabited, leaving both fans and commentators scrambling to decipher the meaning behind his newfound admiration.

While some dismiss this change as another fleeting celebrity whim, a closer look reveals a deeper story, one that speaks to the cracks appearing in the monolithic facade of woke celebrity activism.

For years, Snoop Dogg served as the poster child for Hollywood’s Trump resistance, peppering his raps and social media with acerbic criticism.

The infamous “Lavender” music video depicting a Trump assassination remains etched in the minds of many.

But something changed. Enter Michael Harris, the co-founder of Snoop’s early label, Death Row Records.

After serving 30 years of a life sentence for conspiracy to commit murder, Harris was released following a commutation of his sentence by Trump in January 2021.

This personal experience, it seems, sparked a reevaluation of the former president in Snoop’s eyes.

Gone were the scathing tweets and hostile rhymes; in their place, a newfound respect and acknowledgement of “great work” done by Trump’s team.

Snoop’s pivot is significant because it holds a mirror to the hypocrisy often plaguing celebrity politics.

While Hollywood denizens readily wear the mantle of “social justice warriors,” their pronouncements often ring hollow when confronted with inconvenient truths.

How many other stars have quietly benefited from Trump’s economic policies, enjoying tax cuts and booming markets, while publicly excoriating the man who enacted them? How many have turned a blind eye to Harris’ complex case, content to let their pre-packaged ideological lenses dictate their opinions?

Snoop’s newfound respect for Trump isn’t about blind allegiance or erasing past criticisms.

It’s about recognizing nuance, appreciating the power of personal experiences to shape perspectives, and refusing to be beholden to the pressure of groupthink.

Imagine a world where celebrities, like Snoop Dogg, engage in genuine discussion, openly acknowledging the merits of policies enacted by political adversaries, instead of resorting to performative outrage and virtue-signaling.

This wouldn’t mean the end of political disagreement, but it would usher in a more honest and respectful exchange of ideas.

Snoop Dogg’s change of heart may not resonate with everyone.

But his willingness to break free from the left’s ideological echo chamber serves as a potential catalyst for broader change.

Perhaps, just like the Doggfather’s evolving rhymes, American politics too can embrace greater complexity, nuance, and independent thought.

The question remains: will other celebrities follow Snoop’s lead and dare to rap their own verses of truth, even if they clash with the established chorus? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the Doggfather’s shift has reignited a conversation that the woke left can no longer ignore.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.