Border Czar Homan’s no nonsense approach to the border has impressed Republicans. But the Left is more mad than ever.

Now Tom Homan’s border announcement has left Democrats screaming in rage.

Border Czar Homan Hails Trump’s Reconciliation Bill

Border Czar Tom Homan expressed strong support for President Donald Trump’s “Big, Beautiful” reconciliation bill, describing it as a critical step toward securing the southern border and strengthening enforcement efforts. In an exclusive interview with The Daily Wire, Homan outlined how the legislation equips border authorities with essential resources to protect national security and public safety.

“We’ve made a lot of progress on the border, but we want to keep it permanent,” Homan told The Daily Wire outside the White House on Wednesday, ahead of the bill’s passage. “We need the money, not just for the border, but interior enforcement operations. Money for the border is gonna help continue building the border wall. Every place the border barrier’s been built, illegal immigration went down, illegal drug flow went down, so we gotta put more border wall up.”

His enthusiasm underscores the bill’s role in sustaining and expanding these achievements.

Strategic Investments in Border Security

The Republican-led House passed the reconciliation bill in a tight 215-to-214 vote early Thursday, a major win for the Trump administration after intense negotiations. Homan detailed how the funding will enhance border operations, emphasizing the need for advanced technology alongside physical barriers.

“We need the technology added to the wall so border patrol agents can communicate to one another in dead areas. It’s gonna let us know when people approach the wall, climb over the wall, dig under the wall. We need that technology. So wall and technology plus technology where there’s not a wall, right?” he explained.

Homan also highlighted the importance of technology at ports of entry to maintain efficient trade while detecting contraband, stating, “Also, technology at the ports of entry. So trade can continue at a fast pace, but we have best technology, find drugs and other contraband coming through the ports.”

Additionally, he stressed the urgent funding needs for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), noting, “ICE is in the hole right now. They’ve got about 50,000 people in beds. We’re funded for 34,000. ICE is already in the hole, so if we want to continue this massive deportation operation, we need more money.”

Addressing Criticism and Bipartisan Challenges

Homan robustly defended the administration’s border security record, asserting, “We’re doing great. Right now, the criminals arrested by ICE are about three times higher than Joe Biden under the same timeframe, but it should be 10 times higher because Joe Biden wasn’t doing anything. So we need more money to do more.”

He addressed critics who argue for more deportations, agreeing, “People are asking, they don’t think there’s enough deportations, not enough ICE arrests. I agree with ’em. I’m pushing for more arrests. We need money to do it. We need more money for boots on the ground. More money for detention beds. We should have at least a hundred thousand beds.”

He called for bipartisan support, noting, “there are a handful of Democrats that believe in border security and national security.”

However, he expressed frustration with partisan resistance, stating, “But as a party, you’re never gonna get every vote from every Democrat. ‘Cause I think a lot of ’em put politics over public safety plus politics over national security.”

Homan argued that the administration’s success exposes past failures, saying, “I think there’s a political firestorm right now. I don’t think Democrats are ever gonna agree. Our success shows their failure. Our success shows the lies of the last administration saying the border is secure, showing they’re vetting everybody, and all the lies they told we’re proving ’em wrong.”

Reflecting on his 40-year career, Homan asserted, “I’ve worked for six different presidents. I’ve seen hundreds of policies come and go. I know what works, what doesn’t. What we’re doing right now is working. It’s a game changer.”

He urged Congress to prioritize national interests, concluding, “Give us some money to deal with it, prove that you’re really representing your constituents. Prove that you actually care about the safety and security of this country. Love your community more than you hate President Trump.”

The US is done being pushed around. And everyone knows it now.

Because America flexed its military might in stunning display of power.

U.S. Demonstrates Nuclear Might with ICBM Test Launch

On Wednesday morning, the U.S. Air Force conducted a powerful display of its strategic capabilities, launching a nuclear-capable intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California.

This test, part of a routine evaluation of the nation’s formidable nuclear arsenal, underscored the United States’ ability to deliver a nuclear warhead to any point on Earth. The launch reaffirmed the reliability of America’s aging but still potent missile systems, a critical component of its defense strategy.

The Minuteman III missile, fired without a warhead, blazed across the Pacific at a staggering 15,000 miles per hour, targeting a test site in the Marshall Islands some 4,200 miles away, according to military officials.

This high-speed journey demonstrated the missile’s precision and range, reinforcing its role as a cornerstone of the U.S. nuclear deterrent.

Aging Arsenal and the Sentinel Transition

First introduced in the 1970s, the Minuteman III remains a linchpin of America’s nuclear capabilities but is nearing the end of its operational life. The Air Force has plans to replace it with the cutting-edge Sentinel system, designed to modernize the nation’s ICBM fleet.

However, the Sentinel program has faced significant hurdles, including funding shortages and developmental delays, which have slowed progress and raised concerns about the timeline for deployment.

The Air Force had initially targeted 2039 for phasing out its Cold War-era Minuteman III missiles, but setbacks in the Sentinel program—still in the testing phase—could push this transition to 2050 or beyond, according to Bloomberg.

Despite these challenges, the Air Force remains steadfast in its commitment to maintaining a robust nuclear deterrent, ensuring the Minuteman III remains fully operational until its successor is ready.

A Resilient Nuclear Triad and Strategic Assurance

Wednesday’s successful launch sent a resounding message to allies and adversaries alike: the U.S. nuclear arsenal is ready and reliable. “This ICBM test launch underscores the strength of the nation’s nuclear deterrent and the readiness of the ICBM leg of the triad,” Gen. Thomas Bussiere, commander of the U.S. Global Strike Command, declared in a statement.

The Air Force was quick to clarify that the test was a scheduled exercise, “not a response to current world events,” emphasizing its routine nature.

The U.S. “nuclear triad” forms the backbone of its strategic defense, combining nuclear-armed bombers, stealth submarines equipped with Polaris ICBMs, and approximately 400 land-based Minuteman III missiles. This multi-pronged approach ensures flexibility and resilience in the face of global threats.

The Air Force reiterated its confidence in the Sentinel program’s eventual success, stating that “until full capability is achieved, the Air Force is committed to ensuring Minuteman III remains a viable deterrent.”

This commitment highlights the military’s dedication to maintaining a credible and effective nuclear posture as it navigates the complexities of modernizing its arsenal.

The Bidens haven’t been truthful to the public. And now it’s coming back to bite them.

And the Biden family was caught in a cancer cover-up that is shattering their legacy.

New Book Alleges Biden Family Concealed Beau Biden’s Cancer Diagnosis

A recently released book claims that former President Joe Biden and his late son, Beau Biden, deliberately withheld details and misled the public about Beau’s cancer diagnosis during his tenure as Delaware’s attorney general. The allegations highlight a pattern of secrecy surrounding health issues within the Biden family, according to the authors.

Book Details and Authors

The book, Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again, authored by CNN’s Jake Tapper and Axios’s Alex Thompson, was released on Tuesday. It alleges that the Biden family actively chose to keep Beau Biden’s cancer diagnosis confidential while he served as Delaware’s attorney general.

The book states, “Beau’s cancer treatment also demonstrated the Biden’s capacity for denial and the lengths they would go to to avoid transparency about health issues, even when the person in question is an elected official, in this case the sitting attorney general of Delaware.”

Timeline of Beau Biden’s Illness

According to the book, Beau Biden collapsed during a family vacation in the summer of 2013, leading to surgery to remove a brain tumor. By fall 2013, Beau reduced his public appearances and media interviews.

The book notes, “In September, Biden and Beau’s team internally debated how much to disclose about Beau — the vice president’s son and a state’s top law enforcement officer — but ultimately said nothing.” In November 2013, Beau told a local reporter he had been given a “clean bill of health.” However, in February 2014, a neurologist disclosed that a “small lesion” had been removed from Beau’s brain, despite Joe Biden later describing the tumor as larger than a golf ball.

Efforts to Maintain Secrecy

The book details that Beau Biden continued serving as Delaware’s attorney general while undergoing treatments across the country, often using the pseudonym George Lincoln during hospital visits. Beau’s wife, Hallie, reportedly expressed confusion about the decision to keep his declining health private, believing public disclosure could have garnered support.

The book states, “Publicly acknowledging Beau’s illness would make it a reality. It was them against the world.” Neither Hallie Biden nor a spokesperson for former President Biden immediately responded to requests for comment from Fox News Digital.

The book further claims that then-Vice President Joe Biden instructed his staff to mislead the media about his whereabouts. While his team reported he was traveling to Delaware on weekends, he was also visiting Houston, where Beau was receiving treatment. This effort was part of a broader strategy to maintain privacy around Beau’s condition, according to the authors.

Context of Beau Biden’s Death and Broader Claims

Beau Biden died of a glioblastoma brain tumor in May 2015 at age 46. The book situates these allegations within a larger narrative about the 2024 election cycle, claiming that Joe Biden’s team orchestrated a cover-up to conceal the extent of his own cognitive decline during his re-election campaign. This is one of several books addressing Biden’s decision to run in 2024 and his health challenges.

Recent Biden Health Controversy

The book’s release follows former President Biden’s announcement on Sunday that he had been diagnosed with an “aggressive form” of prostate cancer, a claim his office retracted on Tuesday, stating he had never received such a diagnosis. This incident adds context to the book’s allegations about the Biden family’s handling of health-related transparency.

The allegations raise questions about transparency among public officials, particularly when health issues involve elected leaders. The Biden family’s reported reluctance to disclose Beau’s condition may reflect a broader approach to managing public perception, as outlined in the book.

Around 4 in 5 Americans got at least one COVID vaccine. They may want to pay close attention.

Because the FDA pulled COVID shots from the shelves for this terrifying reason.

FDA Revises COVID-19 Booster Guidelines

On Tuesday, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a significant update to its COVID-19 booster shot policy. The new guidance restricts access to boosters for healthy individuals under 65, moving away from the previous approach of recommending boosters for all.

This change introduces a more selective framework for booster approvals and distribution.

In an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine, FDA Commissioner Martin Makary and vaccine regulator Vinay Prasad outlined the revised policy. They stated that drugmakers must now submit clinical trial data showing that boosters improve overall health outcomes, not just antibody levels, to gain approval.

“For all healthy persons… the FDA anticipates the need for randomized, controlled trial data evaluating clinical outcomes before Biologics License Applications can be granted,” they wrote. This marks a shift from the earlier “one-size-fits-all regulatory framework” used for booster authorizations.

The authors also addressed previous justifications for broad booster recommendations. They noted, “The U.S. policy has sometimes been justified by arguing that the American people are not sophisticated enough to understand age- and risk-based recommendations.”

They added, “We reject this view,” emphasizing the need for clear, evidence-based guidance tailored to specific groups.

Continued Access for High-Risk Groups

Under the updated policy, boosters will remain available without new clinical trial data for individuals over 65 and those in high-risk categories. This includes people as young as six months with underlying health conditions.

The FDA’s definition of “high-risk” is broad, covering conditions such as obesity and depression. Estimates suggest that 100 to 200 million Americans will still qualify for boosters under these criteria.

The policy change comes as booster uptake has declined significantly. Data indicates that fewer than 25% of Americans have received a booster shot in the past two years.

Makary and Prasad highlighted uncertainties about the benefits of repeated vaccinations, stating, “We simply don’t know whether a healthy 52-year-old woman with a normal BMI who has had Covid-19 three times and has received six previous doses of a Covid-19 vaccine will benefit from the seventh dose.”

The new policy aims to address these gaps by requiring more comprehensive data.

Framework for Future Approvals

The FDA’s updated approach seeks to align booster approvals with rigorous scientific standards. The article concluded, “The FDA’s new Covid-19 philosophy represents a balance of regulatory flexibility and a commitment to gold-standard science.”

This framework prioritizes evidence generation while maintaining access for those most likely to benefit from boosters.

The Catholic Church doesn’t often wade into politics. But when it does, they bring out the big guns.

Now these Catholic Bishops shocked everyone with an endorsement of a key Trump policy.

In a bold move to uphold human dignity and protect vulnerable populations, two leading U.S. Catholic bishops have praised recent Congressional efforts to advance a budget that prioritizes life-affirming values.

Their statements reflect a growing momentum to redirect taxpayer funds away from practices that undermine the sanctity of life and family, aligning with policies championed by President Trump’s administration.

Defending the Sanctity of Life

Bishop Daniel E. Thomas, chair of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) Committee on Pro-Life Activities, and Bishop Robert E. Barron, chair of the Committee on Laity, Marriage, Family Life, and Youth, have enthusiastically endorsed provisions in the House budget reconciliation bill that cut federal funding to abortion providers like Planned Parenthood.

“For decades, Planned Parenthood has received government money and offered low-income women one terrible option: to end the lives of their babies,” the bishops stated. This legislation, they argue, takes a courageous step toward ensuring taxpayer dollars no longer subsidize abortions, aligning with the Hyde Amendment’s strict limits to cases of rape, incest, or life-threatening situations for the mother.

The bishops’ support underscores a broader movement, bolstered by President Trump’s pro-life stance, to protect the unborn and uphold the moral fabric of the nation. By redirecting funds away from organizations that profit from abortion, Congress is responding to the calls of millions of Americans who believe in the inherent dignity of every human life.

Safeguarding Youth from Harmful Practices

In addition to addressing abortion, the proposed budget includes measures to block federal funding for so-called “gender transition” services for minors under Medicaid. The bishops sharply criticized the use of taxpayer funds to promote “gender ideology,” particularly through the provision of puberty blockers and hormones to young people. “More recently, they have used the same taxpayer funds to expand their destructive offerings, by promoting gender ideology and providing puberty blockers and hormones to minors, turning them into lifelong patients in the process,” they said.

This stance resonates with President Trump’s push to protect children from irreversible medical interventions that conflict with biological reality and long-term well-being. By halting funding for such procedures, the legislation aims to shield impressionable youth from practices that the bishops describe as harmful to human dignity.

Promoting Authentic, Life-Affirming Healthcare

Beyond defunding harmful practices, Bishops Thomas and Barron called on lawmakers to redirect resources toward “authentic, life-affirming health care providers that serve mothers and their children in need.”

This vision aligns with the Trump administration’s emphasis on supporting families and ensuring access to healthcare that respects both the born and the unborn.

By reallocating funds to organizations that provide holistic support for mothers and children, Congress has an opportunity to build a culture of life that reflects the values of millions of Americans.

The bishops urged the Trump administration and lawmakers to continue championing policies that protect vulnerable populations from “mutilating ‘gender transition’ services and the scourge of abortion.”

Their message is clear: taxpayer dollars should serve the common good, not agendas that undermine the family and human dignity.

A Call to Action

“Americans should not be forced to subsidize abortions and ‘gender transition’ services with their tax dollars,” the bishops declared, echoing a sentiment shared by many who support President Trump’s leadership in advancing pro-life and pro-family policies.

As Congress moves forward with this budget, the bishops’ endorsement serves as a powerful reminder of the Church’s unwavering commitment to the sanctity of life and the well-being of families.

The Left puts anyone other than Americans first. And people are getting tired of it.

Now a leading Democrat met with a Chinese agent to sell out Americans.

Questionable Alliances: Massachusetts Cozies Up to Beijing

Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey recently rolled out the red carpet for Ambassador Chen Li, the Chinese consul general in New York, during a May 7 meeting at the state house. The cozy encounter, complete with smiling photo-ops, saw Healey touting deeper ties with China, despite mounting evidence of Beijing’s shady influence operations in the U.S.

“Today we welcomed Ambassador H.E. Chen Li to Massachusetts. We discussed our shared economic and cultural ties, and our commitment to continuing to work together for the benefit of our people and our economy,” Healey declared in a statement, seemingly oblivious to the diplomatic tightrope she was walking.

The Chinese consulate, which oversees relations with Massachusetts from its Manhattan base, gleefully posted a summary of the meeting on its Chinese-language website, claiming Healey vowed to bolster exchanges with China.

This warm rhetoric clashes with the broader U.S. stance, as President Trump’s trade war with Beijing rages on.

While a minor détente on trade barriers was reached on May 12, the federal government remains wary of China’s tactics to exploit state-level relationships to sidestep Washington’s tougher policies.

A Troubling Track Record: China’s Consulate Under Scrutiny

The sunny tone of Healey’s meeting with Chen raises eyebrows, given the Chinese consulate’s rap sheet. Over the years, the Justice Department has exposed the consulate’s role in a slew of illicit activities, from espionage to repression schemes targeting dissidents on U.S. soil.

One high-profile case involves Linda Sun, a former aide to New York Governor Kathy Hochul, accused of acting as an unregistered agent for Beijing.

Court documents allege Sun worked closely with the consulate to tilt state policies in China’s favor. She’s pleaded not guilty, with her trial looming this summer.

In another instance, Massachusetts resident Litang Liang faced charges of acting as a Chinese agent but was acquitted earlier this year. His defense argued his pro-Beijing activities were protected speech, though prosecutors claimed he funneled information about anti-CCP activists in Boston to consulate officials.

The Justice Department also revealed that senior consulate figures were linked to a secret Chinese police station in Manhattan, shut down by the FBI. Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo didn’t mince words in 2020, flatly stating the consulate was a hub for espionage.

Contrasting Approaches: Other Governors Keep Their Distance

Healey’s embrace of Chen stands in stark contrast to her East Coast counterparts. New York’s Hochul, once chummy with the consulate, swiftly distanced herself after Sun’s arrest, even demanding the expulsion of Chen’s predecessor.

New Jersey’s Phil Murphy, meanwhile, has opted for closer ties with Taiwan’s diplomats and steered clear of public coziness with China’s consulate. Healey’s decision to link her meeting with Chen to Massachusetts’ Chinese-American community—claiming they number nearly 200,000 and make “valued contributions”—is particularly tone-deaf.

Beijing’s propaganda often asserts control over all ethnically Chinese people, regardless of citizenship, a claim used to justify its global repression and influence campaigns. Many Chinese-Americans have no ties to the Chinese Communist Party, making Healey’s framing a risky nod to Beijing’s narrative.

Trump is a doer. And he’s tired of being stopped by cowards.

And now President Trump took matters into his own hands after Congressional Republicans failed him.

President Donald Trump is set to make a bold appearance on Capitol Hill Tuesday morning, rallying House Republicans around his ambitious “one, big, beautiful bill.” This sweeping legislation encapsulates Trump’s vision for America, tackling tax reform, immigration, defense, energy, and the debt ceiling. His hands-on approach signals a renewed energy in Washington, as Republicans work to deliver on his campaign promises. Below, we explore Trump’s leadership, the bill’s key components, and the challenges facing the GOP as they aim to reshape the nation’s future.

Trump’s Commanding Presence in Washington

President Trump’s visit to the House GOP’s weekly conference meeting, confirmed by three House GOP sources and two White House officials to Fox News Digital and Fox News Radio, underscores his commitment to driving his agenda forward.

The closed-door, hour-long session offers Trump a platform to unify Republicans behind a transformative bill that addresses tax cuts, border security, military strength, energy independence, and fiscal responsibility.

“He wants to be involved as much as we need him,” House Speaker Mike Johnson said, noting Trump’s enthusiasm during a Monday morning call.

This escalation in Trump’s involvement marks a refreshing shift from the often-distant leadership of past administrations. His willingness to engage directly with lawmakers reflects a leader determined to deliver results, not just rhetoric.

With the national debt soaring past $36 trillion, Trump’s push for a comprehensive bill via budget reconciliation—which lowers the Senate’s passage threshold to 51 votes—demonstrates his strategic acumen in navigating Washington’s complexities to achieve his America First goals.

A Bold Agenda with Internal Hurdles

The legislation, described as a cornerstone of Trump’s presidency, aims to overhaul multiple sectors while putting the country on a sounder fiscal path. Conservatives are advocating for aggressive reforms, such as accelerating work requirements for Medicaid recipients, currently set for 2029, to curb waste and promote self-reliance.

Fiscal hawks are also demanding an immediate repeal of the Biden administration’s green energy subsidies from the Inflation Reduction Act, fulfilling Trump’s campaign pledge to prioritize American energy dominance over costly environmental mandates.

However, internal GOP divisions pose challenges. Moderates hesitate to slash Medicaid, wary of backlash in their districts, while blue-state Republicans push to raise the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap—a move opposed by colleagues in lower-tax states who see it as benefiting Democrat-run areas.

Despite these tensions, Trump’s leadership offers a unifying force, with his Capitol Hill appearance likely to galvanize lawmakers.

His track record of brokering deals suggests he can bridge these divides, ensuring the bill advances by the House’s Memorial Day target and reaches his desk by the Fourth of July.

A Vision for America’s Future

The GOP’s use of budget reconciliation to bypass Democratic obstruction highlights Trump’s pragmatic approach to governance. By focusing on taxation, the federal budget, and the national debt, the bill sidesteps the Senate’s 60-vote requirement, empowering Republicans to enact sweeping change.

The House Rules Committee, set to review the bill at 1 a.m. Wednesday, serves as the final hurdle before a House-wide vote, with Republicans aiming to pass it by week’s end.

Trump’s vision, as articulated through this legislation, prioritizes economic growth, border security, and energy independence while addressing the nation’s fiscal crisis. His active role contrasts sharply with the Biden era’s stagnation, offering hope to Americans weary of bureaucratic gridlock.

As Speaker Johnson noted, Trump is “very excited, very encouraged,” and his Capitol Hill visit is poised to rally the GOP around a bill that could redefine America’s trajectory. With Trump at the helm, Republicans have a rare opportunity to deliver bold, lasting change.

Trump has made a name for himself as a peace maker. But some are still beating the war drum.

Now Iran made a stunning move that threw a wrench in Donald Trump’s plans.

In a fiery address, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei unleashed a torrent of criticism against President Donald Trump, speaking to a fervent crowd chanting anti-American slogans. This outburst comes as the United States, under Trump’s leadership, pushes for a robust new nuclear agreement with Iran to curb its ambitions. Below, we explore Khamenei’s remarks, the context of Trump’s Middle East strategy, and the ongoing diplomatic tightrope.

Tensions Flare Over Middle East Policy

Amid chants of “death to America,” “death to England,” and “death to Israel,” Khamenei accused Trump of deceit in his Middle East peace efforts. He dismissed Trump’s claims of fostering stability, alleging instead that U.S. actions fuel chaos.

“Some of the things the U.S. president said in his recent visit to the region are not even worthy of a response,” Khamenei declared in a video translated by the Washington D.C.-based Middle East Media Research Institute. “Trump said that he wanted to use power for peace. He is lying.”

Khamenei’s rhetoric reflects deep-seated distrust of American intentions, particularly as Trump’s administration has prioritized a hardline stance against Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The supreme leader also labeled Israel a “cancerous tumor” that must be “uprooted,” intensifying the inflammatory tone of his speech.

Yet, Trump’s recent Middle East tour, which secured nearly $2 trillion in trade and investment deals, signals a counterapproach—one that leverages economic might and regional alliances to stabilize the region and counter Iran’s influence.

Iran’s Defiance and Trump’s Strategic Push

Khamenei further accused Trump and U.S. officials of using power to “perpetrate a massacre in Gaza” and “stir up war” while supporting “mercenaries.”

He questioned, “When have they ever used power for peace?” In response, he vowed that Iran would bolster its own strength, stating, “Indeed, one can use power for peace and security. This is why we will increase our power and the power of our country every day whether the enemies like it or not, inshallah.” This pledge underscores Iran’s determination to resist U.S. pressure, even as diplomatic talks continue.

On the American side, Trump’s leadership has reinvigorated efforts to prevent Iran from achieving nuclear capabilities. U.S. Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff, appearing on ABC’s *This Week*, emphasized an uncompromising stance: “We have one very, very clear red line, and that is enrichment. We cannot allow even 1% of an enrichment capability.”

Witkoff’s remarks highlight Trump’s commitment to ensuring Iran cannot weaponize nuclear technology, a policy that aligns with his broader goal of restoring American strength and influence in global affairs.

A Complex Diplomatic Dance

Khamenei’s provocative words and the crowd’s chants, including “death to those who oppose the rule of the Jurisprudent,” reveal the ideological chasm between Iran’s theocratic regime and the U.S. vision for the Middle East. The reference to Islamic law underscores the regime’s rigid governance, which clashes with Trump’s pragmatic, deal-driven approach.

While Khamenei calls for U.S. withdrawal from the region, Trump’s recent successes—forging historic agreements and rallying Arab nations against Iran’s aggression—demonstrate a renewed American resolve.

The Trump administration’s negotiations with Iran remain a high-stakes endeavor. By drawing a firm line against nuclear enrichment, the U.S. signals that it will not waver in protecting its allies and global security.

Trump’s ability to blend economic incentives with unwavering strength offers a refreshing contrast to past administrations’ wavering policies. As tensions simmer, the world watches whether diplomacy or defiance will shape the future of U.S.-Iran relations.

With a new leader in the Catholic Church, many are curious how he’ll handle foreign affairs. Now we can say confidently that it will look a lot different than before.

Because Pope Leo XIV surprised JD Vance with an offer he couldn’t refuse.

On May 19, 2025, U.S. Vice President JD Vance met with Pope Leo XIV at the Vatican, a significant encounter amid a surge of U.S.-led diplomatic efforts to secure a ceasefire in Russia’s war in Ukraine.

The meeting, attended by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, underscored shared Catholic values and a mutual commitment to peace. This pivotal moment is explored through three key angles: the diplomatic context of the Vatican meeting, the personal and ideological dynamics between Vance and Leo, and the broader U.S.-Vatican collaboration on global conflicts.

Diplomatic Context of the Vatican Meeting

Vance, leading the U.S. delegation to Pope Leo XIV’s inaugural Mass on May 18, met the pontiff the following day as part of a flurry of diplomatic engagements.

“There was an exchange of views on some current international issues, calling for respect for humanitarian law and international law in areas of conflict and for a negotiated solution between the parties involved,” a Vatican statement noted.

The Vatican, sidelined in the first three years of Russia’s invasion, has offered to host peace talks and continues humanitarian efforts, such as prisoner swaps and reuniting Ukrainian children.

Vance’s Sunday meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, followed by President Trump’s planned calls with Vladimir Putin and Zelenskyy on Monday, reflect a concerted U.S. push for a ceasefire, with the Vatican as a key ally.

Personal and Ideological Dynamics

Both Vance, a Catholic convert since 2019, and Pope Leo XIV, the first American pope and former Cardinal Robert Prevost, share a Catholic identity but have clashed on policy.

Before his May 8 election, Leo shared X posts critical of the Trump administration’s mass deportation plans, a stance echoing Pope Francis’s focus on migrants and the poor.

Vance, one of the last officials to meet Francis before his April 21 death, faced public rebukes from the late pope over migration, with Francis correcting Vance’s theological defense of deportations.

Despite this, Vance expressed pride in Leo, saying Sunday, “The United States was very proud of him,” and gifted him a Chicago Bears jersey emblazoned with “Pope Leo XIV.” The 45-minute audience, joined by Rubio, also a Catholic, highlighted a desire to align on peace efforts while navigating past tensions.

U.S.-Vatican Collaboration on Global Conflicts

The meeting signals a reset in U.S.-Vatican relations, with the Trump administration seeking to leverage Leo’s peace advocacy. Leo, a Chicago-born missionary who served in Chiclayo, Peru, has vowed “every effort” to end the Ukraine conflict, a commitment he reiterated at his inaugural Mass, calling for peace in Ukraine, Gaza, and Myanmar.

Vance’s aide cited his National Catholic Prayer Breakfast remarks, stating, “Where I think President Trump’s policy is most in accord with Christian social teaching and with the Catholic faith is that more than any president of my lifetime, President Trump has pursued a path of peace.”

The Vatican’s offer to mediate, backed by Secretary of State Pietro Parolin’s suggestion to host direct talks, aligns with U.S. initiatives, including recent ceasefire brokering between India and Pakistan, which Leo “welcomed with satisfaction.”

This collaboration aims to bolster Trump’s “peacemaker” vision amid ongoing global crises.

Joe Biden should take a hint and fade into the background. Instead he’s making it all about him again.

Now he came back to haunt Democrats in the worst possible way.

Potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidates are navigating a minefield of questions about former President Joe Biden’s cognitive health and his decision to run for re-election in 2024, as they take early steps in the White House race.

The scrutiny, fueled by a new book and Biden’s faltering 2024 campaign, is testing the candor of figures like Pete Buttigieg.

This dynamic is explored through three lenses: the persistent questions about Biden’s decline, the varied responses from contenders, and the Democratic Party’s struggle to move forward.

Persistent Questions About Biden’s Decline

At a recent Iowa town hall, Pete Buttigieg faced pointed questions about Biden’s cognitive state during his presidency. “Did President Joe Biden experience cognitive decline while in office?” a reporter asked. Buttigieg, Biden’s former Transportation Secretary, replied, “Every time I needed something from him from the West Wing, I got it.”

A follow-up question probed whether Democrats would have fared better had Biden not run, to which he admitted, “Maybe. Right now, with the benefit of hindsight, I think most people would agree that that’s the case.”

These queries, amplified by *Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again*, reflect voter concerns about a perceived White House cover-up, especially after Biden’s disastrous June 2024 debate with Donald Trump led to his withdrawal.

Varied Responses from 2028 Contenders

Democratic hopefuls are grappling with how to address Biden’s tenure, with responses shaped by their proximity to him.

Rep. Ro Khanna, a 2024 Biden surrogate, wrote, “To rebuild trust, Democrats must be honest. In light of the facts that have come out, Joe Biden should not have run for reelection, and we should have had an open primary.”

He added, “But obviously we did not have the full picture, and in hindsight it is painfully obvious that President Biden should have made the patriotic decision not to run.” Senator Chris Murphy told Politico, “There’s no doubt about it,” regarding Biden’s decline, and said, “I mean, isn’t that self-evident? We lost,” lamenting the party’s 2024 strategy.

Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, however, distanced herself, saying on CNN, “I didn’t see the president frequently,” but admitted, “It does make me question a lot of the things I thought I knew over the last year and a half.”

Democratic Party’s Struggle to Move Forward

The grilling of potential 2028 contenders underscores the Democratic Party’s challenge to process its 2024 losses—Kamala Harris’s defeat, the Senate’s fall, and failure to reclaim the House—while addressing Biden’s legacy.

New Hampshire radio host Chris Ryan noted, “The Democratic voters are still trying to sort through what happened and why.”

The varied responses highlight a tension between honesty and political caution, with Ryan observing that voters value “truthfulness” on Biden’s fitness. Buttigieg emphasized the need to pivot, stating, “We’re not in a position to wallow in hindsight.

We’ve got to get ready for some fundamental tests of the future of this country and this party.” As Democrats confront these questions, their ability to balance accountability with forward momentum will shape the party’s path toward 2028.

Big Pharma wanted to keep this under wraps. But the truth has been revealed.

Now RFK Jr. admitted one shocking truth about the COVID vaccine that is making waves.

The Independent Medical Alliance (IMA) has launched Smart Moms Ask, a national parental rights campaign urging the federal government to remove the COVID mRNA vaccine from the childhood immunization schedule, tapping into the same grassroots energy that secured Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s confirmation as Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary.

This movement, driven by concerns over vaccine safety, is gaining traction amid shifting federal health policy.

The campaign is explored through three critical perspectives: the grassroots push for policy change, emerging skepticism from health officials, and the cited risks fueling parental concerns.

Grassroots Push for Policy Change

The Smart Moms Ask campaign, spearheaded by IMA, demands that HHS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “stop mRNA COVID shots for kids and pregnant women” and remove them from the childhood vaccine schedule.

Dr. Kat Lindley, IMA Fellowship Program Director, declared, “Moms are the fiercest protectors of their children, yet they’ve been bullied into accepting mRNA shots with devastating risks.”

The campaign’s petition invites Americans to join this call, echoing the activism that propelled Kennedy’s HHS confirmation.

In 2022, Kennedy criticized the CDC’s decision to add the mRNA shots to the childhood schedule as a “reckless action,” accusing the agency of prioritizing “pharma overlords” over “child welfare.”

This grassroots effort seeks to reverse that decision, amplifying parental voices in a charged health policy debate.

Emerging Skepticism from Health Officials

Recent statements from FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary bolster the campaign’s case, as he questioned the necessity of mRNA COVID shots for healthy children. During an interview with Charlie Kirk, Makary stated, “Look, I’d love to see the evidence to show that giving young, healthy children another COVID shot – you know, a sixth COVID booster – would help them,” but asserted, “that evidence does not exist.”

He noted that other countries, particularly in Europe, have already recommended against vaccinating young, healthy children, and predicted an upcoming U.S. policy shift, saying, “I think you’re going to see some announcement on that in the coming weeks.”

Makary’s acknowledgment that “there’s no good randomized control data” for the latest vaccine formulation signals a potential reevaluation at the federal level, aligning with the campaign’s demands.

Cited Risks Fueling Parental Concerns

The Smart Moms Ask campaign cites alarming statistics from peer-reviewed studies to justify its push, highlighting risks to children and pregnant women. According to the campaign, 9.5 million U.S. children aged 6 months to 17 years have received the mRNA shot as of April 19, 2025.

It points to a 620% increase in myocarditis among young men post-vaccination, miscarriage rates as high as 81% in a Pfizer Patient Safety study (compared to a 13% average), and a 33% lower successful conception rate for vaccinated women in 2022.

“The risks are real, and parents deserve the truth,” the campaign asserts, drawing on IMA’s expertise as the former Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance. These figures, paired with Kennedy’s prior condemnation of the CDC’s 2022 decision, fuel parental distrust and drive the campaign’s urgency to protect vulnerable populations from what it calls “devastating risks.”

The Left pretends Trump embarrasses this nation. But now other countries respect us.

And a standing ovation for Trump overseas has sent Democrats into hysterics

At the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum 2025, President Donald Trump delivered a pivotal speech on May 13, heralding a new era in U.S.-Saudi relations and earning a standing ovation.

His address celebrated Saudi Arabia’s transformation and reinforced a historic partnership, signaling a robust strategic alliance.

This moment is explored through three key perspectives: the reaffirmation of bilateral ties, praise for Saudi Arabia’s self-driven progress, and a call for regional diplomatic expansion.

Reaffirming a Historic Partnership

Trump emphasized the enduring bond between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, rooted in the 1945 USS Quincy meeting between President Franklin Roosevelt and King Abdul Aziz.

“With this historic state visit, we celebrate more than 80 years of close partnership between the United States and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” he declared, adding, “Today, we reaffirm this important bond, and we take the next steps to make our relationship closer, stronger, and more powerful than ever before.”

His remarks underscored a commitment to deepen ties, with a vision for collaboration that transcends past challenges.

Trump’s assertion that the relationship is “more powerful than ever before” reflects a renewed alignment, bolstered by shared economic and geopolitical interests.

Celebrating Saudi Arabia’s Self-Driven Progress

The president lauded the transformative reforms led by King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, describing them as “truly extraordinary.”

He marveled at Saudi Arabia’s architectural and developmental strides, stating, “The majestic skyscrapers, the towers that I see, the difference between now and eight years ago — and eight years ago was very impressive.”

Trump highlighted that this progress stems from local ingenuity, not foreign intervention, saying, “No, the gleaming marvels of Riyadh and Abu Dhabi were not created by the so-called nation-builders, neocons, or liberal nonprofits like those who spent trillions and trillions of dollars failing to develop Kabul, Baghdad,media, so many other cities.”

This emphasis on Saudi self-reliance celebrates the kingdom’s sovereignty and vision, distinguishing it from failed Western-led projects.

Advocating for Regional Diplomacy

Trump concluded his speech with a bold call for Saudi Arabia to join the Abraham Accords, a move he deemed critical for Middle Eastern stability.

This invitation aligns with his broader vision for regional cooperation, building on the accords’ framework to foster peace and economic ties. He framed the U.S.-Saudi alliance as a foundation for mutual success, stating, “We will work together. We will be together. We will succeed together. We will win together. And we will always be friends.”

The proposal underscores Trump’s ambition to expand diplomatic normalization in the region, leveraging the strengthened U.S.-Saudi partnership to promote broader geopolitical alignment and prosperity.