Home Blog Page 37

Biden’s shocking Trump trial lies have turned the nation against him

Since the weaponization of the justice system by the Biden administration, Americans have been worried. But now, they are more than worried… they are scared.

And Biden’s shocking Trump trial lies have turned the nation against him.

The Biden White House and the Biden-Harris campaign have consistently stated that the criminal trials against former President Donald Trump are not political and do not represent a weaponization of the Department of Justice (DOJ). They maintain that the DOJ operates independently.

However, on Tuesday, the Biden campaign staged a conspicuous political event outside the New York City courthouse where Trump has been facing charges of falsification of business records.

Speaking to the press, campaign communications director Michael Taylor attempted to deflect attention from the courthouse proceedings, stating, “First of all, let me say this first and foremost, we’re not here today because of what’s going on over there,” while motioning towards the courthouse.

“We’re here today because you all are here.” He then introduced Biden campaigners, including actor Robert De Niro and two Capitol Police officers who were on duty on January 6, 2021.

Taylor then targeted Biden’s chief political opponent, Donald Trump, who currently leads Biden in many swing state polls.

Taylor suggested that Trump was “somewhere fighting for himself,” labeling him an “unhinged, power-hungry, self-centered man” who “rambles.”

He further insinuated that Trump might not “show up” for the upcoming debate, casting doubt on his willingness to confront Biden directly.

When questioned about the independence of the DOJ in its pursuit of criminal cases against Trump, the White House reiterated that President Biden had restored “integrity” to the DOJ by appointing Merrick Garland as Attorney General.

However, a report from The New York Times suggested that Biden had instructed Garland to prosecute Trump, raising concerns about the impartiality of these proceedings.

Despite these allegations, the White House continued to assert that there was no political motivation behind Trump’s prosecution.

The White House press secretary maintained that “It would not be appropriate for us to comment on any ongoing investigations.”

However, this stance did not prevent the Biden campaign from holding a politically charged event outside the courthouse where Trump’s trial was taking place. This move has raised eyebrows and fueled speculation about the campaign’s true intentions.

Tyler justified the campaign’s decision to stage the event by emphasizing the perceived threat Trump poses to the nation and to “democracy.”

He acknowledged concerns that such an event might suggest the Biden campaign and administration have a vested interest in securing a conviction against Trump.

Although the jury has been instructed to avoid media coverage of the case, they have not been sequestered, heightening concerns about potential bias.

Biden spokesperson Tyler reiterated the campaign’s stance, stating that the event was necessary due to the threat Trump poses.

He addressed the optics of staging a campaign event outside Trump’s trial, acknowledging that it could give the appearance of a conflict of interest.

However, the Left continues to make the Trump trial about politics, and they continue to weaponize the justice system against anyone who disagrees politically with them.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Rogue White House official makes insane announcement that will change everything

With the Radical Left doing everything they can to push their destructive agenda on Americans, people are starting to fight back. But this recent situation is different.

And a rogue White House official makes insane announcement that will change everything.

Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg faced tough questions on CBS’ Face the Nation about the Biden administration’s sluggish progress in building electric vehicle (EV) charging stations, despite a significant allocation of funds for the project.

During the interview, Buttigieg was unable to provide an explanation as to why, despite the $7.5 billion earmarked for EV charging infrastructure in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, the administration had only managed to construct only “seven or eight” EV charging stations by April 2024.

This revelation comes as a stark contrast to the administration’s ambitious goal of deploying half a million EV chargers by the end of the decade.

MARGARET BRENNAN: “–obviously it’s resonating for him, because he wouldn’t bring it up so frequently if there wasn’t some anxiety that he’s tapping into. And let me ask about a portion of this that I think does fall under your portfolio and that’s the charging stations you mentioned. The Federal Highway Administration says only seven or eight charging stations have been produced with the $7.5 billion investment that taxpayers made back in 2021. Why isn’t that happening more quickly?”

SECRETARY BUTTIGIEG: “So the President’s goal is to have half a million chargers up by the end of this decade. Now, in order to do a charger, it’s more than just plunking a- a small device into the ground, there’s utility work, and this is also, really, a new category of federal investment. But we’ve been working with each of the 50 states, every one of them is getting formula dollars to do this work–”

MARGARET BRENNAN: “Seven or eight, though?”

SECRETARY BUTTIGIEG: “–Engaging them and the first handful- again, by 2030, 500,000 chargers. And the very first handful of chargers are now already being physically built. But again, that’s the absolute very, very beginning stages of the construction to come.”

MARGARET BRENNAN: “Right. But- but that gets to the point about not being able to make long-distance travel possible quickly if you don’t have the infrastructure there to support it.”

SECRETARY BUTTIGIEG: “Right, so–”

MARGARET BRENNAN: “So you recognize it should be–”

SECRETARY BUTTIGIEG: “Most of the charging infrastructure right now is being provided by the private sector. The reason that we’re investing federal dollars is to fill in some of the gaps in areas where it is not yet profitable for the private sector to do it. Now, again, the majority of charging will happen at home …”

The Left claims that the slow progress has been attributed to various factors, including local zoning restrictions and bureaucratic red tape.

However, critics argue that the administration has not done enough to streamline the process, particularly when compared to the Trump administration, which was known for cutting regulatory hurdles to expedite projects.

Republican lawmakers and conservative commentators have been quick to point out the administration’s failure to deliver on its promises, highlighting the disconnect between the allocated funds and the tangible outcomes.

The issue of EV infrastructure is crucial, especially as the Biden administration continues to push for a transition to green energy and electric vehicles as part of its broader climate agenda.

Former President Donald Trump was known for his aggressive approach to eliminating bureaucratic obstacles, a strategy that many conservatives argue should be adopted by the current administration to accelerate the deployment of EV charging stations.

Trump’s policies focused on reducing regulatory burdens to facilitate quicker implementation of infrastructure projects, a stark contrast to the current slow-moving process under Biden.

To meet its goal of 500,000 EV chargers by 2030, the Biden administration will need to address these challenges head-on.

This includes cutting through the red tape that has hampered progress and ensuring that federal investments are effectively utilized to build the necessary infrastructure.

Secretary Buttigieg’s appearance on Face the Nation has shown the American people just how much time and money the Left is wasting in order to push their Radical Agenda.

With billions of taxpayer dollars sunk into this absurd push already, and with little results to show from it, Americans are infuriated.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Legal analyst delivers crazy Trump acquittal news that prosecutors are furious about

The Trump criminal cases are well underway. But the outcome is all but sure.

Because a legal analyst delivered stunning Trump acquittal news that the Trump prosecutors are furious about.

The first Donald Trump indictment case to be hitting the court system has been the “hush money” case where rogue Manhattan District Attorney lackeys slapped Trump with an indictment for supposed “business and election” fraud. They allege that Donald Trump knowingly tried to pay adult film star Stormy Daniels hundreds of thousands of dollars in hush money to keep quiet about a former affair.

Let’s just say the case hasn’t been going well for the Trump prosecution team. That’s putting it lightly. This case seems to be more dead than Hillary Clinton’s political career after losing in 2016.

Stormy Daniels herself has admitted that she’s previously signed documents that say that Donald Trump did not have any affair with her at any point and did not pay her any form of “hush money.”

Michael Cohen, who was supposed to be the biggest witness for the prosecution, has come across as the untrustworthy liar that he is. Even Leftist outlets like CNN are saying they don’t trust Cohen at all.

It’s just been a disaster from the start for the prosecution, but what’s crazy is that it just might get worse for the Trump haters. How so? Well apparently an acquittal is on the table for former President Donald Trump. Meaning, all this could go away in an instant.

How? Reports say that the jury includes two lawyers. Why is that important? They are going to be looking at this case with a lot of skepticism, as most legal experts would. Current and former lawyers aren’t likely to just be easily swayed by weak arguments being made by the prosecution.

Former Department of Justice spokesman Anthony Coley has raised concerns about the potential impact of having two lawyers on the jury in the trial of former President Donald Trump. The trial, led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, centers on allegations that Trump falsified business documents to conceal a payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. The presence of a young corporate law attorney and a civil litigation attorney among the 12 jurors could, according to Coley, pose significant challenges for the prosecution.

Coley shared his apprehensions on Jonathan Lemire Reports, highlighting the potential for these jurors to overanalyze the case, thereby influencing their fellow jurors in ways that might disadvantage the prosecution.

“I think what I would worry about if I’m on the prosecution case, and I say this tongue in cheek, because I ran communications at arguably the largest law firm in the world, the U.S. Justice Department, I do worry that there are lawyers on this jury, not one but two lawyers,” Coley remarked.

He elaborated, “By my own experience, lawyers can sometimes be overly analytical. They can be hyper technical. I worry that the nonlawyers on this jury may rely on the lawyers who, quite frankly, don’t have expertise in this area of the law.”

A critical aspect of Bragg’s case hinges on the testimony of Michael Cohen, Trump’s former attorney, who has been scrutinized for his credibility issues. Legal analysts have pointed out that Cohen’s testimony, which includes admissions of theft from his previous employer, presents vulnerabilities for the prosecution. Coley believes the defense will capitalize on these credibility issues to undermine the prosecution’s case.

“I think their strategy can really be summed up in four words,” Coley said. “Don’t believe Michael Cohen. And what we saw in four days of meandering testimony and cross-examination towards the end of this trial, we saw them take a couple hits at Michael Cohen’s credibility. We now know, for example, that in addition to being a convicted felon and a liar, we know that Michael Cohen by his own admission is a thief. So I expect to see defense attorneys return to those schematics.”

As the trial progresses, the influence of the two lawyers on the jury remains a focal point of concern for the prosecution. Their potential to sway the jury’s deliberations through their analytical approach could prove to be a decisive factor in the outcome of the case.

Based on the early analysis of the case, it seems like the prosecution is going to be up against it by trying to get a unanimous agreement from the jury that they’ll be looking for to get Trump convicted.

If they thought anything different, that’s just hilarious. When your best witnesses are an adult film star and a pathological liar, you’re not going to be in for a good day at the office.

You can watch the clip below:

Stay tuned to the DC Daily Journal.

Biden is in disbelief after receiving an Oval Office eviction notice from Congress

0

Joe Biden’s poll numbers are looking abysmal. That’s caused some Leftists to wonder if he’s the right choice as the Democrat nominee.

And Biden is in disbelief after receiving an Oval Office eviction notice from Congress.

President Joe Biden’s reelection chances are in serious jeopardy.

The latest polls show him trailing former President Donald Trump in several crucial battleground states.

Biden’s approval ratings are also in bad shape as we inch closer and closer to the general election in November.

Because of all of this, there have been rumblings that the Democrat Party may find a way to replace the president with a more popular candidate.

Nate Silver, a data analyst, has also suggested that the Left try and find another option for Biden.

“If Biden is still struggling in August he needs to consider stepping aside. It’s not a great situation for Ds either way, but you have to do due diligence on the question,” Silver said in a post on X.

Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) revealed important insight into Silver’s suggestion of replacing Biden during a recent appearance on Fox News Sunday.

“No, it’s not a conversation worth having. Nate, thanks for your participation. But this is ridiculous. We’re well past that conversation,” Moskowitz stated.

“President Biden is going to be the nominee. We’re going to have our convention and he’s going to win in November. This is going to be between two people. The way I look at the election is do you want Trump back or do you not? That is the crux of the issue.”

Moskowitz brought up abortion and a “woman’s right to choose” as a reason why voters will flock to Joe Biden this fall.

He did bring up illegal immigration and how Democrats haven’t been as strong on that issue, but he also somehow found a way to blame Republicans for it.

“On immigration. Quite frankly, I think both parties are to blame. Democrats were late to come to the table. When we came to the table and got a bipartisan agreement with a conservative bill coming out of the Senate then Republicans walked away because Trump wants to use it in the election,” Moskowitz claimed.

But despite his claims, the Florida Democrat made no reference to how disastrous the Biden administration has been in their handling of the southern border and the mass influx of illegal immigrants that have come through it.

Rep. Moskowitz didn’t make note of the record amount of migrants that have come into this country illegally under President Biden’s watch. He most likely ignored that fact because it didn’t fit his narrative that Biden is a better option than Trump.

The congressman did surrender to the fact that Joe Biden is in a tight race against the former president. But he also claimed that Biden would end up winning reelection in November.

“The election is very close. We’re kind of at halftime now. It’s down to a couple of states,” Moskowitz said.

According to a recent RealClearPolitics aggregate, Joe Biden is trailing Donald Trump nationally by 1.1%.

Stay tuned to the DC Daily Journal.

Biden’s shocking statements regarding terrorists’ nuclear program have millions worried

Joe Biden’s foreign policies are known to be terrible. But this newest development might be one of the worst yet.

And Biden’s shocking statements regarding terrorists’ nuclear program have millions worried.

In a shocking and controversial move, President Joe Biden is reportedly urging America’s European allies to ease off pressuring Iran regarding its illegal nuclear activities, even as the Islamic Republic accelerates its stockpile of near-weapons grade nuclear fuel.

The Biden administration is specifically attempting to dissuade Britain and France from pushing for a censure of Iran at the upcoming International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) member-state board meeting next month, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal, which cited various diplomats.

Additionally, the Biden administration has been lobbying several other countries to abstain from voting in favor of censuring Iran, a stance the administration itself plans to adopt.

European diplomats have voiced their concerns, warning that the failure to take decisive action would undermine the IAEA’s authority, which is responsible for policing the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons.

These diplomats argue that it also diminishes the credibility of Western pressure on Iran and expresses frustration over what they perceive as U.S. efforts to weaken their strategy.

Despite these diplomatic pressures, the Biden administration maintains that it is increasing pressure on Iran through sanctions and international isolation.

However, critics point out that sanctions enforcement has been relaxed, allowing Iran to generate tens of billions of dollars in oil revenue.

“Iran’s level of cooperation with the agency remains unacceptable,” stated Laura Holgate, the U.S. ambassador to the IAEA. “The board must be prepared to take further action should Iran’s cooperation not improve dramatically.”

Recent reports from the IAEA, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog, indicate that Iran has significantly increased its stockpile of near weapons-grade enriched uranium.

According to the Associated Press, Iran’s stockpile of 60% enriched uranium has risen from 121.5 kilograms to 142.1 kilograms in a few months.

The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD) highlights that 99% of the effort required to produce weapons-grade uranium occurs during the enrichment phase to 60%. The final phase, which involves boosting it to 90% or higher, constitutes just “the last 1% of the effort needed to produce the fuel for a nuclear weapon.” This crucial period, known as “breakout time,” takes only seven days.

Iran began enriching uranium to 20% and 60% and stockpiling both shortly after the November 2020 elections. Under President Biden, who has relaxed sanctions enforcement against the nation, Iran has amassed unprecedented levels of enriched uranium, violating international law.

The Biden administration’s strategy regarding Iran has faced substantial criticism. While the administration claims to be increasing pressure through sanctions and diplomatic isolation, the reality is that Iran continues to expand its nuclear capabilities unchecked. Andrea Stricker, Deputy Director and Research Fellow of FDD’s Nonproliferation & Biodefense program, commented on the situation:

“IAEA’s latest reporting shows Iran is steadily increasing its proximity to nuclear weapons. The Biden admin. naively believes Tehran is undertaking restraint via indirect talks and U.S. sanctions relief,” Stricker said. “Yet the regime is taking a ‘boiling the frog’ approach to nuclear breakout. By the time Washington realizes it, the frog will be cooked, and the regime will have a nuclear deterrent.”

Stricker further informed The Daily Wire that as of February, Iran possessed enough enriched uranium to produce 13 nuclear weapons once the uranium is enriched to 90%. The regime could produce nearly four weapons immediately using just its stock of 60% enriched uranium.

The Biden administration’s apparent reluctance to confront Iran more forcefully raises significant concerns about the future of global security and the effectiveness of international nonproliferation efforts. Critics argue that this approach sends the wrong message to Tehran, effectively enabling their nuclear ambitions while undermining the credibility of the IAEA and international agreements.

Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR), a vocal critic of the administration’s Iran policy, remarked, “This administration’s failure to hold Iran accountable for its nuclear ambitions is not only dangerous but also signals a disturbing weakness in U.S. foreign policy. By backing down, we are compromising our national security and the security of our allies.”

As the world watches Iran inch closer to achieving a nuclear weapon, the Biden administration’s stance continues to spark heated debate.

While the administration maintains that it is exerting pressure on Tehran, the lack of robust action and the relaxation of sanctions enforcement tell a different story.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Republican Senator drops a major bombshell about who Trump’s VP pick will be

0

Everyone is dying to know who the former president will pick as his running mate. But thanks to this GOP politician, we may finally have an answer.

Because a Republican Senator dropped a major bombshell about who Trump’s VP pick will be.

Voters have been speculating for months now on who former President Donald Trump will select as his next vice president.

There’s also been rumors that many high-profile Republicans are being currently considered by Trump to be his running mate.

Some of those names include: Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL), Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL), Gov. Doug Burgum (R-ND), and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL). Of those names, Gov. DeSantis is the only one who has stated that he’s not interested in the vice presidential role.

But another name has recently come out as a possible contender for the VP spot.

Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) has revealed that it would be an “extreme honor” to serve as vice president under Donald Trump.

Ernst made the comments during a weekend interview on SiriusXM Patriot 125’s Breitbart News Memorial Day Weekend program.

During the interview she was questioned on if she would accept the role of Trump’s running mate if asked to.

“I think there are a lot of really wonderful people who are being considered,” Ernst began in her answer. “And I think that anyone who is offered [the] position, whether it would be me or someone else, I think that it would be such an extreme honor to have that opportunity laid out. I certainly would consider that.”

“I appreciate serving the people of Iowa, I’m so thankful to be in the United States Senate.”

Regardless of Ernst’s willingness to accept the VP spot, it’s most likely that the former president won’t make his official pick until the Republican National Convention in July.

That hasn’t stopped political pundits and GOP politicians from making assumptions on who Trump will pick.

While interviewing with Newsmax’s Eric Bolling, Sen. Scott made an assumption himself about his chances to win the veepstakes.

“I hear there’s a debate in July,” Scott said, a reference to a proposed vice presidential debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and Trump’s running mate.

“If you’re the guy moderating, maybe I’ll be talking to you. We’ll see what happens.” Bolling then bluntly asked if Scott will end up serving as VP.

“We’ll see, we’ll see,” Scott answered.

It’s also been reported by Gov. Burgum, through comments he made to the New York Post, that Trump has 50 candidates to pick from right now.

And that number may have just gone up based off Joni Ernst’s recent comments regarding her role as a vice presidential candidate for Donald Trump.

Stay tuned to the DC Daily Journal.

Lawyers slap Joe Biden with a criminal accusation with serious implications for the 2024 election

0

The 2020 election was crazy and contentious enough. But 2024 is turning into a real circus.

Because lawyers just slapped President Biden with a criminal accusation that has jaw-dropping implications for the 2024 election cycle.

In recent months, the Biden administration has been focusing on a new initiative that he believes will help him get over the finish line when it comes time for Americans to cast their vote this November. The only problem is that many are questioning the legality of the initiative.

President Biden and his Democrat lackeys are pushing a sort of “Get Out The Vote” campaign that is designed to push Americans to get registered to vote. This is based on a 2021 executive order that Biden signed that ordered federal agencies to specifically look into ways to get more Americans to sign up to vote.

The only issue is that many lawyers are wondering if the way the Biden administration’s going about this is even legal in the first place. It could be violating a number of key federal laws, like the Hatch Act.

The Biden administration’s initiative to boost voter registration is raising legal concerns, with experts suggesting it may violate multiple federal laws. President Joe Biden’s executive order, signed in March 2021, directs federal agencies to explore ways to promote voter registration and participation, collaborating with nonprofits in get-out-the-vote efforts.

However, the initiative’s opaque implementation process has made it difficult to ascertain its legality, according to legal experts who have been recently interviewed by reporters.

At the heart of the controversy is the Hatch Act, which restricts federal employees from engaging in political activities. Election law attorney Audrey Perry Martin indicated that the order could breach this law, depending on its execution. “If executive agencies accept volunteer services from third-party organizations with a partisan purpose to register voters, that would appear to violate the Hatch Act,” Audrey shared with the Daily Caller. The administration’s lack of transparency about the initiative’s details exacerbates concerns about potential legal violations.

The order mandates agencies to enlist “approved, nonpartisan third-party organizations and State officials to provide voter registration services on agency premises.” Records obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project suggest the initiative is a “partisan voter mobilization effort” favoring Democratic groups, citing its origins and the organizations involved in its planning.

Demos, a Left-wing think tank, advocated for a similar approach in December 2020 to enhance civic participation, especially among Black and brown Americans. The day Biden’s order was signed, Demos celebrated it as a priority for the administration and a culmination of its long-standing efforts. Many groups involved in a July 2021 listening session on the order’s implementation were members of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, including the Southern Poverty Law Center and the National Center for Transgender Equality, further raising concerns about partisan influences.

Perry Martin emphasized that the involvement of predominantly Left-leaning groups in implementing the order could signify Hatch Act violations if federal agency voter registration efforts appear politically motivated.

Proposals from these groups included the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) suggestion to use the Head Start program for voter registration and Demos’ proposal to leverage the Housing and Urban Development agency for the same purpose. These strategies could violate the Hatch Act if federal employees or nonprofits engage in partisan activities while assisting clients, according to Hans von Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation.

Von Spakovsky also argued that the executive order might violate the Anti-Deficiency Act, which prohibits federal employees from making expenditures not authorized by Congress. “Unless Congress authorized and appropriated funds for federal employees to engage in voter registration activities, they are violating the law,” he said.

Beyond federal concerns, the executive order faces opposition at the state level. Twenty-seven Pennsylvania state legislators have sued to block the order, along with actions by Democratic Governor Josh Shapiro and Secretary of the Commonwealth Al Schmidt. The lawsuit argues these actions violate the Electors Clause and Elections Clause by altering Pennsylvania election laws without legislative involvement.

The legislators’ case relies on the independent state legislature theory, suggesting that the Elections Clause grants state legislatures the exclusive power to determine election procedures.

This theory was partially rejected by the Supreme Court in Moore v. Harper, but the current case focuses on election process details, potentially bolstering the legislators’ argument.

A pending Supreme Court petition seeks a ruling on whether the legislators have standing to sue. A district court dismissed their case on standing grounds in March. “Pennsylvania’s voter registration laws, enacted by the constitutionally designated lawmakers, are the first line of defense in protecting the election system,” Jessica Hart Steinmann of the America First Policy Institute said. “Executive officials have no authority to change the laws and may only enforce existing laws.”

As legal challenges progress, the Biden administration’s voter registration initiative continues to face scrutiny over its potential legal ramifications and the extent of its partisan undertones.

Non-partisan organizations have thus far been fairly critical of the Biden administration’s voter registration initiative, and that has to raise red flags about what they might have in store in the coming months ahead of the 2024 election cycle.

Be sure to stay tuned to the DC Daily Journal for more critical 2024 election updates.

New Video of President Biden has Washington, D.C. in shambles

It seems every week there’s a Biden gaffe to talk about. But this is more than just a gaffe.

As a new video of President Biden has Washington, D.C. wondering what in the world is going on.

There’s a few good reasons why President Joe Biden’s approval ratings are a complete and utter dumpster fire and have been for nearly two years now. You could point to the economy, immigration, and a whole host of other things.

If you look at the graphs of his approval ratings since his inauguration, the summer of 2021 really started to sink the Biden administration. Well what happened there that Biden and company have not been able to recover from?

The Afghanistan pullout disaster. No doubt that since 2021, the major issues that are keeping Joe Biden’s approval ratings low are the struggling economy as inflation ravages Americans’ finances as well as illegal immigration run amok.

Yet, the one issue that truly marked the end of the honeymoon period for Mr. Biden and the Democrats, it was foreign policy. Specifically his mishandling of the U.S. military around the world as Americans watched in horror what went on in Afghanistan.

Recently, the Republican National Party published a video online that highlighted just how dangerous Joe Biden has been for the safety of America and her citizens. Not just because of illegal immigration being left unchecked, but also because of major foreign conflicts popping up every other month.

The RNC put up a video this weekend with testimony from a handful of U.S. House Representatives who served in the U.S. military. The House Reps were extremely critical of Joe Biden’s performance so far in handling foreign affairs, and alleged that the United States is closer to “World War III” than at any point in history.

Derrick Van Orden from the state of Wisconsin said that we “are closer to World War Three than we have been in my lifetime,” and added that this includes when he served during the Reagan administration.

Watch the clip below:

All you have to do is look at how atrocious the Biden administration’s record on foreign policy and international peace has been so far to see why he’s receiving so much heat for it lately.

The Biden Democrat lackeys have been claiming that the Ukraine war would be over any day now for more than two years now, and they continue to propagandize the Americans to drum up support for sending billions of taxpayer dollars more to the proxy war.

Israel, America’s closest ally, is getting mixed signals every single week from the Biden administration about how they should approach their war against the cowardly terrorists in Hamas after the tragic October 7th attack.

Iran is growing more and more bold in their campaign to build nuclear weapons for a holy war against Israel and eventually the rest of the major Western civilizations like in America and Britain.

China is inching closer to invading Taiwan. That’s another issue that the Biden administration continues to flip-flop. Would America militarily support Taiwan in the event China invaded? Who knows. It doesn’t even seem like the White House knows.

Americans exercising their voting rights this November will be looking at this, alongside the manifold issues that Joe Biden is failing on, and they are going to be wondering whether the nearly 82-year old President deserves another four years in office.

That’s a hard sell for the Democrats. Especially as Donald Trump continues to outperform anyone’s expectations for him in the polls.

Which really makes one wonder if the Democrats are content to put Biden up against Donald Trump once more. Maybe the “magic” of 2020 won’t strike again for the Democrats.

Stay tuned to the DC Daily Journal.

U.S. House Democrat commits treason during speech and now the DNC is panicking

The Radical Left preaches tolerance and inclusivity. But their policies and actions are always harmful and destructive.

And now, a U.S. House Democrat commits treason during speech and now the DNC is panicking.

In a move that has sparked conversation across the nation, New York Representative Mike Lawler has called for the immediate removal of Representative Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) from Congress.

This comes after Tlaib delivered a speech at the People’s Conference for Palestine, an event funded and supported by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a US-designated terrorist organization.

Rep. Lawler minced no words in his condemnation of Tlaib’s involvement with the conference.

“Associating with and speaking before groups that are funded by US-designated terrorist organizations is disqualifying,” he stated.

Lawler’s call for Tlaib’s removal highlights the serious implications of a sitting US congresswoman engaging with a group that has been recognized as a terrorist organization not only by the United States but also by Japan, Canada, and the European Union.

The event was sponsored by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a Marxist-Leninist terrorist organization headquartered in Damascus, Syria, according to the Jerusalem Post.

During her speech, Tlaib criticized President Joe Biden’s handling of the Israel-Hamas conflict:

“President Biden says what’s happening in Gaza is not a genocide. Where’s your red line, President Biden?” she asked, eliciting boos from the audience directed at the president.

Tlaib’s remarks at the conference included strong criticisms of US foreign policy and its impact on domestic issues.

“Every single bullet, every single gun, every single weapon, bombs that we send, is a sacrifice of our own schools here at home,” she said.

In her speech, she demanded an apology for anti-Israel activists, asserting, “I’ll be damned if I wait 10 years before they apologize to all of you for doing what was right at this moment.”

She further criticized her colleagues in Congress and the Biden administration for what she described as cowardice in smearing those protesting to save lives, regardless of faith or ethnicity.

“It is disgraceful that the Biden administration and my colleagues in Congress continue to smear them for protesting to save lives no matter faith or ethnicity. It is cowardly. But we’re not gonna forget in November, are we?”

The conflict between Israel and Hamas began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas launched an attack on Israel, killing 1,200 people and kidnapping over 200. While some hostages have been released, the fate of many remains uncertain.

Rep. Lawler’s demand for Tlaib’s removal is grounded in her association with a terrorist-backed organization and her inflammatory rhetoric, which he argues is disqualifying for a member of Congress.

Lawler’s statement reflects a broader sentiment among many Americans who view Tlaib’s actions as not only irresponsible but also dangerous.

They argue that her continued presence in Congress undermines US national security and foreign policy interests.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Illegal immigrant issues chilling warning to American citizens

Everyone knows that the border crisis under Joe Biden is at a boiling point. And the security of our nation is in question.

But now, an illegal immigrant has issued a chilling warning to American citizens.

A Turkish man who illegally entered the United States through the southern border has issued a stark warning to Americans about the alarming state of border security under President Joe Biden’s administration.

In an interview with Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin, the man expressed his shock at the ease with which he was able to cross into the U.S., emphasizing the potential dangers posed by the lack of proper security measures.

The Turkish man, who paid a Mexican drug cartel $10,000 to smuggle him into the U.S., spoke candidly about his concerns.

“In fact, American people is right, completely true,” he said. “Who comes into this country? They don’t know.”

The man highlighted the serious security risks posed by the current state of the border.

“Okay, I’m good, but how if they’re not good?” he asked, gesturing towards other migrants around him.

“How if they’re k*llers, psychopaths, else? No guarantee of that. Like, no security, no security check, no background check.”

His comments reflect a broader concern among many Americans about the Biden administration’s handling of border security.

Since taking office, President Biden has reversed many of the immigration policies implemented by his predecessor, former President Donald Trump.

These changes have been criticized by Americans and border security advocates who point out that they have led to a surge in illegal immigration and compromised national security.

Melugin posted a clip of the interview on X, formerly known as Twitter, where the Turkish man expressed his disbelief at how easy it was to cross the U.S. border with no resistance.

“A Turkish man who crossed into Jacumba, CA illegally w/ a group of other Turkish men told me he paid $10k to a cartel, & expressed shock at how easy it was to cross the U.S. border with no resistance, telling me Americans should be ‘worried’ about security & who is crossing,” Melugin wrote.

The Turkish man’s experience is not an isolated incident. Reports of increased illegal crossings and the involvement of criminal organizations in human smuggling have raised significant concerns.

The Biden administration’s approach to border security has been marked by a more lenient stance on immigration enforcement, which critics argue has led to a rise in illegal crossings and emboldened cartels.

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) has been vocal about the issue, stating, “The Biden administration’s open border policies have turned every state into a border state and every town into a border town.” He added, “This is a crisis of their own making, and it is putting American lives at risk.”

The financial cost of illegal immigration is also a major concern.

According to the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), illegal immigration costs U.S. taxpayers approximately $132 billion annually, a figure that has likely increased with the recent surge in illegal crossings.

These costs include healthcare, education, and law enforcement expenses.

Former President Trump has weighed in on the issue, stating, “Our border is now wide open for anyone to cross, and it is a disaster waiting to happen. We need strong borders to keep our country safe.”

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Multiple US troops in Gaza wounded because of Biden’s failed policies

While Joe Biden and the Left have promised that no American troops would be in harm’s way in the Middle East, it appears that they have lied. And this most recent incident highlights the terrible foreign policies of the Left.

Because now, multiple US troops in Gaza have been wounded and Americans are infuriated.

In a troubling development for President Joe Biden’s administration, three U.S. soldiers were injured, one critically, during an operation aimed at delivering humanitarian aid to Gaza.

This incident underscores the dangers of executing humanitarian missions in conflict zones and raises questions about the efficacy and safety of current U.S. strategies in the region.

On May 23, a U.S. service member sustained a non-combat-related injury aboard the USNS Benavidez (T-AKR 306), which was involved in a mission to supply humanitarian aid to Gaza.

A U.S. defense official confirmed that the critically injured soldier was transported to a medical facility.

“The service member was transported to a medical facility and is in critical condition at this time. More information will be provided as it becomes available,” the official stated.

Two other soldiers were also injured during the operation.

According to a U.S. Central Command official, one soldier suffered an ankle injury while another sustained a back injury.

The critically injured soldier was evacuated to a hospital in Israel for urgent care.

The operation is part of a larger effort to deliver humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip, which has been devastated by ongoing conflict. However, the mission has faced significant challenges.

Pentagon spokesperson Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder admitted on Tuesday that none of the 569 tons of aid transported to Gaza since last week has reached the Palestinian people.

“The U.S. military is delivering [the aid] to the causeway. It’s then taken by non-U.S. contractors, driven over onto shore, put into an assembly area, which is where the NGOs that are supporting this effort pick it up and take it for onward distribution,” Ryder explained.

He acknowledged that despite discussions and efforts to establish alternative routes for safe cargo movement, the aid had been intercepted before reaching its intended recipients.

Reuters reported a particularly disheartening incident on Saturday where 16 trucks en route to a warehouse were overrun.

Eleven of these trucks were “cleaned out by Palestinians during the journey through an area that a U.N. official said has been hard to access with humanitarian aid.”

This highlights the severe security challenges and the desperate conditions on the ground.

Maj. Gen. Ryder confirmed during a press conference that the aid was intercepted by individuals who commandeered the supplies from the vehicles.

“Aid was making it in, but none of the aid that has come in from the pier has been distributed to civilians in Gaza,” he said.

The $320 million pier constructed for Gaza’s aid distribution is at risk of becoming another failed initiative under President Biden.

The U.N. World Food Program has expressed concerns that conditions in Gaza are preventing the proper distribution of food and other essentials. The majority of these supplies are being stolen, exacerbating the already dire humanitarian crisis.

As of Thursday, U.S. Central Command reported that 820.5 tons of aid had been offloaded from the pier, with 506 tons successfully reaching a warehouse.

However, it remains unclear if any of these supplies have been distributed to the civilians who desperately need them.

Many people argue that the administration’s handling of the Gaza aid operation is symptomatic of larger strategic failures in U.S. foreign policy.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Trump makes NY Democrat admit the shocking truth for everyone to hear

Democrats hate the truth. And they try and do everything they can to cover it up.

But recently, Trump made a NY Democrat admit the shocking truth for everyone to hear.

In a surprising turn of events, former President Donald Trump managed to sway a New York Democrat to voice support for his policies while criticizing President Joe Biden during a rally in the South Bronx.

The woman, who chose to remain anonymous, was on her way to Crotona Park to attend Trump’s Thursday rally when she spoke with Savanah Hernandez.

Despite her longstanding Democratic affiliation, the woman candidly expressed her belief that Trump had been a better leader than Biden, especially in terms of economic policies and national security.

“I’m not at all a Trump supporter,” she began, emphasizing her reluctance. “But I’m here because when Trump was president, it was much better. I mean — he didn’t — the world wasn’t on fire.”

She noted that under Biden’s administration, the cost of living had skyrocketed, citing significant increases in the price of gas and other essentials.

“The prices went up like crazy. The price of gas, everything. So from the — he’s the best, I shouldn’t say of the worst — but there’s no choice.”

The woman confirmed her Democratic Party affiliation but explained that she has voted across party lines when necessary.

“I go according to who is better,” she said, implying that her support for Trump was based on his performance rather than party loyalty.

When asked about her thoughts on President Biden, the woman did not hold back. “Well, I think he’s destroying the country with his policies,” she stated bluntly.

“Things are getting worse and worse, and more — we could end up with World War III with Biden.”

Her concerns about Biden’s foreign policy were particularly pointed, suggesting that his approach could lead to global conflict. In contrast, she viewed Trump as a stabilizing force.

“I think that Trump is going to … Make America Great Again [laughs] you know, I’m saying that.”

The woman was clear that her support for Trump was not rooted in personal admiration. “I don’t like his personality,” she admitted. “Forget it.”

However, she separated her personal feelings from her assessment of his policies. “His policies were much better. Much, much better.”

This sentiment reflects a broader trend among many voters who, despite personal misgivings about Trump’s character, appreciated his administration’s economic and foreign policies.

It highlights the critical issue of policy performance over personality in political leadership.

This incident in the Bronx is emblematic of a larger shift that is occurring among voters.

Despite deep-seated partisan affiliations, there is a growing willingness to cross party lines if it means electing leaders who can address their concerns more effectively.

Trump’s ability to draw support from a Democratic voter in a traditionally blue stronghold like the Bronx indicates his continued influence and the potential for significant crossover appeal.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.