The Harris campaign is reportedly considering people to be her potential VP. And as expected, a lot of the people are terrible.

But this Harris VP contender’s chilling background could mean even more destruction for America.

Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ), who has recently emerged as a leading contender for Vice President Kamala Harris’s potential running mate, is now under intense scrutiny.

Reports have surfaced detailing his involvement in launching a spy balloon company funded by Chinese venture capital, a revelation that comes on the heels of the Chinese spy balloon controversy in February 2023.

Before his tenure as a U.S. Senator, Mark Kelly had an illustrious career as an astronaut. However, he also ventured into the private sector, founding World View in 2012, an Arizona-based company originally focused on space tourism via high-altitude balloons.

As technology evolved, so did the company’s mission. According to a spokesperson for World View, the company shifted its focus towards providing remote sensing services for defense, scientific, and commercial purposes.

“Today, our primary business remains providing remote sensing services to the U.S. Department of Defense and her allies by way of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities, as well as servicing scientific organizations like NASA, NOAA, and others to better understand Earth from the unique atmospheric layer of the stratosphere,” the spokesperson told Fox News.

The controversy surrounding Kelly stems from World View’s funding history. Shortly after its inception, World View secured venture capital from Tencent, one of China’s largest corporations, in 2013 and again in 2016.

Tencent, founded by some of the wealthiest and most influential figures in China, including “Pony” Ma Huateng, who was listed as the fourth richest man in China last year, has known ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

The timing of these revelations is particularly concerning given the recent incidents involving Chinese spy balloons detected over U.S. airspace. Although World View has insisted that Tencent has “zero access, zero input, and zero control” over its operations, the fact that a Chinese-funded company has been involved in technologies capable of surveillance raises significant national security questions.

“The current leadership believed it was a mistake for the company to accept Chinese investment when it did,” World View stated. Yet, this acknowledgment does little to mitigate concerns about the potential influence of Chinese capital on technologies critical to U.S. defense.

Mark Kelly left World View in 2019 to focus on his Senate campaign, placing his financial interests in the company into a blind trust. While he has relinquished direct control, the early funding from a Chinese entity remains a significant point of contention.

Critics argue that Kelly’s involvement with World View, particularly its acceptance of Chinese investment, disqualifies him from consideration as a vice-presidential candidate.

Arizona Republican operative Daniel Scarpinato told the New York Times, “Mr. Kelly has also not faced the harsh spotlight of a national campaign and has potential political liabilities like a high-altitude surveillance balloon company he helped found with Chinese venture capital.”

This controversy casts a shadow over the Biden administration’s vetting process and its broader approach to national security. President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have already faced criticism for their handling of foreign policy and defense matters.

The administration’s perceived weakness in China, coupled with a lack of decisive action in countering CCP influence, has left many questioning their commitment to safeguarding American interests.

The Biden administration’s response to the Chinese spy balloon incident in February 2023 was seen by many as lackluster and scary, going so far as to highlight the administration’s lack of care for the US and love for China.

Rather than taking a firm stand, the administration’s approach was characterized by diplomatic platitudes and a failure to deliver substantive actions to deter future espionage attempts.

As Senator Mark Kelly’s potential candidacy for Vice President comes under scrutiny, the revelations about his ties to Chinese-funded World View underscore the need for a more stringent vetting process and a robust approach to national security.

We must ensure the Biden administration addresses these concerns head-on, ensuring that individuals with potential conflicts of interest, especially those involving adversarial nations like China, are thoroughly examined.

In a time of increasing global tension, the American public deserves leaders who are transparent, uncompromised, and unwavering in their commitment to national security.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Biden administration claims it cares about the American people. But their actions clearly prove otherwise.

Because a new Biden-Harris proposal sees more money stolen from American taxpayers.

In a move that has drawn sharp criticism from conservatives and concerned citizens alike, the Biden-Harris administration has proposed a new rule that would allow illegal immigrants to access taxpayer-funded college preparatory programs initially designed to assist low-income American citizens.

This controversial proposal is viewed by many as another instance of the administration prioritizing the interests of illegal immigrants over American citizens.

The new rule from the Biden-Harris Department of Education seeks to extend eligibility for federal TRIO programs to include illegal immigrants who qualify for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

These TRIO programs, which were originally intended to support low-income individuals, first-generation college students, and individuals with disabilities, help participants progress through the academic pipeline from middle school to post-baccalaureate programs.

“The proposed changes would expand eligibility to include students without immigration status,” the proposed rule states. This expansion would effectively open the door for DACA recipients, who are in the country illegally, to benefit from programs funded by American taxpayers.

Representative Jim Banks (R-IN) has been vocal in his opposition to the proposed rule, arguing that it would divert essential resources from American citizens to illegal immigrants. “The Biden-Harris administration’s proposal would take college preparatory aid away from American citizens and give it to illegal aliens,” Banks asserted.

He emphasized the need for legislative action to protect the interests of American families, referencing his American Students First Act, which aims to ensure that taxpayer-funded programs are reserved for U.S. citizens.

Virginia Foxx (R-NC), Chairwoman of the House Education and Workforce Committee, also criticized the proposed rule. Foxx highlighted the numerous challenges currently facing students and the education system, including rising costs, a botched FAFSA rollout, and rampant anti-Semitism on college campuses.

“But what is the Biden administration focused on? Siphoning resources away from low-income American citizens by stretching college-prep programs thin to cover illegal immigrants,” Foxx stated.

The proposed rule comes amid the largest surge in illegal immigration in American history, with over 10 million people unlawfully crossing the border during the Biden-Harris administration.

Additionally, an estimated 1.7 million illegal immigrant gotaways have been recorded since January 2021, reflecting the administration’s failure to effectively manage border security.

Public opinion surveys indicate that a growing number of Americans favor reducing immigration and increasing deportations. Illegal immigration has emerged as a critical issue for voters as the November election approaches.

The Biden-Harris administration’s immigration policies, seen by many as overly lenient and ineffective, have contributed to the perception that the administration is not prioritizing the needs and security of American citizens.

Critics argue that the proposed rule to extend TRIO program eligibility to illegal immigrants will exacerbate existing challenges within the education system. By diverting resources away from low-income American students, the administration risks undermining the very purpose of these programs.

The expansion of eligibility to illegal immigrants could strain already limited resources, making it more difficult for American citizens to access the support they need to succeed academically.

Moreover, the proposal raises questions about the administration’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring that taxpayer funds are used to benefit American citizens.

By prioritizing the interests of illegal immigrants, the Biden-Harris administration appears to be neglecting its duty to serve and protect the interests of its own citizens.

The Biden-Harris administration’s proposed rule to allow illegal immigrants access to taxpayer-funded college preparatory programs represents a significant shift in policy that has sparked considerable controversy.

Critics, including key Republican figures, argue that this move will divert essential resources away from American citizens, exacerbating existing challenges within the education system and undermining the purpose of federal TRIO programs.

As the nation grapples with unprecedented levels of illegal immigration and the Biden-Harris administration’s perceived failure to effectively manage border security, this latest proposal only adds to the growing list of concerns among American citizens.

The administration’s focus on extending benefits to illegal immigrants, at the expense of American citizens, underscores the need for a reassessment of priorities and a commitment to upholding the rule of law.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Radical Left loves fake news. But even many Democrats have to admit, they’ve taken it too far.

Because the Harris campaign is spreading horrific and false claims about Donald Trump.

In a glaring example of political manipulation, the Kamala Harris campaign recently posted a statement suggesting that former President Donald Trump promised to “end American democracy” during a speech last Friday.

This baseless accusation was supported by a heavily edited clip that stripped Trump’s comments of crucial context, misleadingly implying that the GOP nominee seeks to abolish elections altogether.

The statement in question was posted alongside a video snippet from Trump’s address at a Turning Point USA event. The Harris campaign’s post insinuated that Trump was advocating for the cessation of democratic elections.

Our statement on Trump last night promising to end American democracy https://t.co/URjtvFCsg2 pic.twitter.com/KAMPPxDr9E

— Kamala HQ (@KamalaHQ) July 27, 2024

However, a review of the full speech reveals a starkly different narrative. Trump was, in fact, discussing the need for robust election integrity, emphasizing measures such as voter ID, paper ballots, and secure voting laws.

In his speech, Trump explicitly stated, “We have to have voter ID, it’s called voter identification,” underscoring the necessity of securing the electoral process.

He criticized the Democrats for their resistance to voter ID laws, asserting, “Now there’s only one reason they do that, they want to cheat… You know in their National Convention when they had their convention they have a voter tag on them bigger than their chest.”

Trump continued, pointing out the hypocrisy of the Democrats who, while requiring ID for their convention, oppose similar requirements for voting. He further emphasized the critical nature of voting, saying, “Republicans must win; we have to win this election — the most important election ever. We want a landslide that’s too big to rig.”

Trump’s remarks were intended to galvanize voter participation, urging Republicans and Christians in particular to vote in unprecedented numbers to ensure a fair and secure election.
He appealed directly to Christians, saying, “Christians, get out and vote just this time. You won’t have to do it anymore; four more years, you know what, it’ll be fixed, it’ll be fine. You won’t have to vote anymore, my beautiful Christians, I love you. Get out, you got to get out and vote. In four years, you don’t have to vote again; we’ll have it fixed so good you’re not going to have to vote.”

This hyperbolic statement, typical of Trump’s rhetorical style, was clearly meant to emphasize the establishment of a secure voting system that would render future electoral fraud concerns obsolete.

Yet, the Harris campaign chose to distort these words, presenting them as an ominous threat to democracy rather than a call to action for election integrity.

Trump’s speech touched upon several critical issues concerning election security. He advocated for measures such as paper ballots, stringent voter ID laws, and other reforms designed to protect the sanctity of the voting process.

He highlighted the inconsistency of the Democrats, who require strict identification measures for their own events but oppose similar safeguards for public elections.

Trump’s central argument was that the Democrats’ reluctance to implement voter ID laws is rooted in a desire to manipulate the electoral system. He asserted that a secure voting process is essential for the preservation of democracy, not its dismantling. His call for a “landslide that’s too big to rig” was a rallying cry for widespread voter participation to ensure an incontrovertible election outcome.

The Harris campaign’s misleading post is symptomatic of a broader strategy employed by the Biden administration to undermine political opponents through misinformation. By disseminating a manipulated video clip, the Harris campaign aimed to sow distrust and fear among voters, painting Trump as a threat to democracy rather than a proponent of its fortification.

This tactic is not an isolated incident but part of a pattern observed throughout Biden’s presidency. From misrepresenting policy proposals to distorting statements, the administration has frequently resorted to such measures to discredit political adversaries. The aim is clear: to distract from their own policy failures and galvanize their base by presenting a distorted view of the opposition.

The Harris campaign’s recent actions underscore the necessity for vigilance and discernment in political discourse. It is imperative that voters seek out the full context of statements and policies rather than relying on selectively edited clips designed to mislead. The integrity of our democratic process depends on an informed electorate that can distinguish between genuine calls for reform and manipulative political tactics.

In the end, Trump’s message was about ensuring a fair and secure electoral process — a goal that should be shared by all who value democracy. The Harris campaign’s attempt to twist this message into a dire threat is not only disingenuous but a disservice to the very democratic principles they claim to defend.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Biden administration has made it clear that they do not care about the US. But no one thought they would go this far.

And now the Biden administration has been caught bringing terrorists into the US.

Border Patrol agents recently apprehended three Palestinian terror suspects who illegally entered the United States through the southern border. This incident has majorly highlighted the growing concern over the Biden administration’s handling of border security and demonstrates a systemic failure that potentially endangers American lives.

The individuals were part of a larger group of illegal aliens crossing through the San Diego sector. This sector has become a hotspot for illegal entries, with Border Patrol agents increasingly overwhelmed and under-resourced.

The New York Post reports that the Border Patrol lacks the necessary tools to effectively screen and assess the flood of illegal entrants, raising serious questions about national security.

One of the Palestinian suspects had a disturbing image on their phone depicting a masked man holding an automatic rifle. Although the specific terrorist group affiliation remains unclear, the implications are alarming.

A Border Patrol agent, speaking anonymously, expressed frustration and a sense of futility: “I wanted to get into Border Patrol and protect from terrorists. And it’s like, well, I probably let terrorists into the country.” This sentiment reflects the broader dissatisfaction within the ranks of those charged with protecting our borders.

Adding to the gravity of the situation, another apprehended individual was a Turkish national with known ties to terror groups.

The Biden administration’s recent changes to asylum regulations, though intended to manage the influx of migrants, appear to contain loopholes that facilitate the reentry of potentially dangerous individuals.

Border Patrol agents rely heavily on U.S. terror watchlists to flag potential threats. However, the lack of access to international criminal databases severely hampers their efforts.

As one agent lamented, “Knowing who these guys are, we have, like, no access to anything international. We really don’t know.”

In response to the October 7 massacre in Israel, the federal law enforcement agency issued a memo urging heightened vigilance for hostile actors attempting to cross the border from the Middle East.

The San Diego Field Office Intelligence Unit warned that individuals motivated by the Israel-Hamas conflict might attempt to infiltrate the U.S. via Mexico. The memo included details on identifying marks and patches associated with groups like Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and Hezbollah.

This is not an isolated incident. The number of illegal immigrants flagged on the terror watchlist has soared under the Biden administration.

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data reveals a dramatic increase from 26 individuals between 2017 and 2020 to 98 in 2022, and 169 in 2023. These figures paint a stark picture of the growing threat posed by inadequate border security.

The administration’s failure to adequately address border security is not a new criticism. President Biden and his team have repeatedly downplayed the issue, even as public disapproval of their handling of the border crisis mounts. Critics argue that the administration’s approach is not only ineffective but dangerously negligent.

The Biden administration’s response to these failures has been lackluster. Despite the clear and present danger, there has been little meaningful action to bolster border security. Instead, the focus has often been on downplaying the severity of the situation and dismissing legitimate concerns as political stunts.

In light of these recent apprehensions, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive overhaul of border security protocols. This includes better funding for the Border Patrol, enhanced training, and greater access to international criminal databases. Without these measures, the U.S. remains vulnerable to infiltration by hostile actors intent on causing harm.

The arrest of three Palestinian terror suspects at the southern border is a reminder of the Biden administration’s border security failures. As the number of illegal crossings continues to rise, so too does the risk to national security.

It is imperative that immediate and decisive action is taken to secure our borders and protect the American people from the very real threat posed by terrorist infiltration.

We must hold our elected officials accountable for their actions.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Harris campaign is doing everything they can to convince America to choose Kamala Harris to be the next President. But instead of appealing to American principles, they are making horrific moves.

And the Harris campaign’s shocking racist move has angered millions of Americans.

On Thursday, a staggering 160,000 white Democrat women participated in a Zoom call aimed at teaching them how to be better allies to Vice President Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign. The primary message: shut up and listen to black Indigenous people of color (BIPOC).

This training session, titled “White Women: Answer the Call,” saw prominent liberal celebrities like Megan Rapinoe, Pink, and Connie Britton, among others, urging white women to leverage their privilege to support Harris. This event underscores a troubling trend in the Democratic Party: the manipulation of white guilt for political gain.

From “White Women: Answer the Call” for Kamala Harris:

“If you find yourself talking over or speaking for BIPOC individuals or—god forbid—correcting them, just take a beat and instead we can put our listening ears on.”

pic.twitter.com/7eAUty1OXk

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) July 28, 2024

The training, led by Arielle Fodor, emphasized the need for white women to remain silent and listen to BIPOC voices. “As white women, we need to use our privilege to make positive changes,” Fodor stated. “If you find yourself talking over or speaking for BIPOC individuals – or God forbid correcting them – just take a beat, and instead, we can put our listening ears on.”

This sentiment was echoed throughout the session, with Fodor and other speakers highlighting the importance of checking one’s “blind spots” and being ready for feedback.

They urged participants to follow BIPOC activists and creators and to share their content. Fodor even suggested that white women should engage in uncomfortable conversations with their “bigoted family members” to further the cause.

Elizabeth Minnella, another leader of the training, introduced her favorite group, “Witches for Harris,” and encouraged activists to send Harris donation links to voters and allies. The call featured appearances from Megan Rapinoe, Pink, and Connie Britton, who joked that they should be called “Karens for Kamala.” Rapinoe, known for her outspoken criticism of America, added a layer of irony to the event, given her past statements.

“Witches for Harris”

The “white women for Kamala Harris” movement is in full effect. pic.twitter.com/WtIiOtFyqZ

— TENET Media (@watchTENETnow) July 28, 2024

The Thursday event was inspired by a previous Zoom call organized by the activist group “Win With Black Women,” which took place shortly after President Joe Biden announced his decision not to seek re-election, instead endorsing Harris.

The event aimed to galvanize white Democrat women to support Harris’s campaign, leveraging their guilt and privilege as political tools.

Following the success of the white women’s Zoom call, a similar meeting for white Democrat men, titled “White Dudes for Harris,” has been scheduled. This move illustrates the broader strategy of the Harris campaign: utilizing identity politics and white guilt to rally support.

This development raises several questions about the state of the Democratic Party and its reliance on identity politics. The call’s directive for white women to remain silent and listen instead of engaging in meaningful dialogue reflects a troubling trend of division and exclusion.

By focusing on race and guilt, the Harris campaign risks alienating potential supporters who feel manipulated rather than inspired.

Neutrality and Balance
The approach taken in this Zoom call may not be the most effective way to achieve these goals. Encouraging silence and compliance rather than open dialogue and mutual understanding could foster resentment and division.

It is essential to consider whether such tactics truly serve the cause of justice or merely perpetuate a cycle of guilt and obligation.

The “White Women: Answer the Call” Zoom call highlights a critical issue within the Democratic Party’s strategy for the upcoming election.

By leveraging white guilt and emphasizing silence over dialogue, the Harris campaign risks furthering division rather than unity. It remains to be seen whether these tactics will succeed in galvanizing support or if they will backfire, alienating potential allies in the process.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Even though the election is still months away, Democrats are already scrambling and making massive mistakes. And those mistakes have cost them majorly.

Because now, Democrats have just handed Trump a massive election win already.

In a remarkable shift in the political landscape, former President Donald Trump is leading Vice President Kamala Harris in four out of five crucial swing states, according to one of the first major polls conducted since President Joe Biden announced his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race.

Harris, the presumptive Democratic nominee, trails Trump in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, while both candidates are tied in Wisconsin.

Poll Results: Trump’s Lead in Swing States

The poll, conducted by Emerson College Polling between July 22-23, revealed the following results:

Arizona: Trump leads Harris 49% to 44%.
Georgia: Trump is ahead with 48% to Harris’s 46%.
Michigan: Trump holds a slight lead at 46% to 45%.
Pennsylvania: Trump is ahead with 48% to Harris’s 46%.
Wisconsin: Trump and Harris are tied at 47%.

The sample size for three of the five swing states was 800 voters, while Pennsylvania had 850 voters surveyed and Wisconsin had 845. The margin of error in the poll was ±3.4% for the three states with 800 voters and ±3.3% for Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

Among the top issues influencing voters in these states are the economy and immigration, both areas where Trump has historically polled better compared to Joe Biden.

Executive Director of Emerson College Polling, Spencer Kimball, noted that while Harris saw a slight increase in support compared to Biden, the shift has not been significant enough to close the gap with Trump.

“Young voters have shifted toward Harris: her support compared to Biden increased by 16 points in Arizona, eight in Georgia, five in Michigan, 11 in Pennsylvania, and one in Wisconsin since earlier polling this month,” Kimball said. However, despite these gains among younger voters, Trump continues to maintain a strong lead overall.

President Biden’s decision to step down from the race has dramatically altered the dynamics of the 2024 presidential election.

Biden had been losing support among young voters, particularly over his handling of the Israel-Hamas conflict and other contentious issues.

This erosion of support appears to have somewhat stabilized with Harris stepping into the spotlight, yet it remains insufficient to overcome Trump’s lead in key battleground states.

According to the Real Clear Politics polling average, Trump leads Harris nationally by just under two points. This national lead, coupled with his advantage in critical swing states, underscores the formidable position Trump holds as the 2024 election approaches.

From a conservative perspective, these poll results signify a potential resurgence for Trump and the Republican Party. Trump’s ability to lead Harris in states that were pivotal in the 2020 election demonstrates his enduring appeal and the effectiveness of his policies, particularly on economic and immigration issues.

The economy, a cornerstone of Trump’s previous administration, continues to resonate with voters who have felt the pinch of inflation and economic uncertainty under the current administration. Trump’s promises to restore economic stability and growth are likely playing a significant role in his favorability.

Immigration remains another critical issue where Trump’s policies have garnered support. The Biden administration’s handling of the southern border has been widely criticized, and voters appear to be leaning towards Trump’s tougher stance on immigration as a solution to the ongoing crisis.

As the election campaign progresses, it will be crucial for Harris to address the economic and immigration concerns that are currently bolstering Trump’s lead.

Meanwhile, Trump and his team are expected to capitalize on these issues, further solidifying his support base and potentially expanding his lead.

The early polling results following Biden’s exit from the race indicate a challenging road ahead for Vice President Kamala Harris. With Trump leading in four out of five swing states and holding a national lead, the former president is well-positioned as a formidable contender in the 2024 presidential race.

As the campaign unfolds, the focus on key issues like the economy and immigration will likely intensify, shaping the strategies and outcomes for both candidates.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

The mainstream media loves to spread misinformation. But now, they have crossed a line.

Because the media has been caught red-handed spreading lies about Trump’s VP pick, and people are outraged.

Senator JD Vance, the Vice Presidential candidate alongside former President Donald Trump, has come under a coordinated attack from Democrats and their media allies for his family-centric comments over the past few years.

Vance, known for his staunch pro-family, pro-worker, and pro-middle-class stance, has been unfairly depicted as anti-woman by those who intentionally take his common-sense statements out of context. This orchestrated smear campaign should not deceive anyone.

Vance’s comments, which have drawn ire from liberal media outlets, are rooted in his genuine concern for the declining family values in America. “Why have we let the Democrat Party become controlled by people who don’t have children?” Vance asked, acknowledging the plight of those who wish to have children but are unable to.

“There have always been people like that, who even though they would like to have kids, are unable to have them. Let’s set them aside,” he said. This nuanced view was deliberately overlooked by the media.

ABC headlined their story with “JD Vance slammed for ‘childless cat ladies’ comment,” while NBC followed with “Jennifer Aniston slams JD Vance over ‘childless cat ladies’ comment from resurfaced interview,” and MSNBC’s headline, “Jesus did not have children,” further amplified the controversy.

The Washington Post even roped in “Swifties” to join the chorus of criticism. These outlets intentionally misrepresented Vance’s remarks, aiming to ridicule not only him but also American families who prioritize familial bonds over materialism.

Vance’s remarks at a 2021 talk at the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, where he discussed the American Dream and the integral role of the family in American life, have been particularly targeted.

Drawing from his bestselling book, Hillbilly Elegy, Vance highlighted how the family is central to happiness and American values. He criticized the left’s rejection of family values, describing it as “the most pernicious and most evil thing” they have done in this country.

On Tucker Carlson Tonight, Vance elaborated, “What I was basically saying is that we’re effectively run in this country, via the Democrats, via our corporate oligarchs, by a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made and they want to make the rest of the country miserable too.”
He pointed out the irony of prominent Democrats like Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, none of whom have children, yet are leading the party’s future.

“And how is it that we’ve turned our country over to people who don’t have a direct stake in it?” Vance asked. “I just wanted to ask that question and propose that maybe if we wanted a healthy ruling class in this country we should invest more, we should vote more, we should support more people who actually have kids, because those are the people who ultimately have more of a direct stake in the future of this country.”

Vance criticized the materialistic lives of those who prioritize career and wealth over family. He noted that many women who forgo having children for their careers often regret this decision later in life, a truth that Democrats avoid discussing.

Instead, they promote staying single and childless, devaluing marriage and motherhood while promoting abortion as a path to freedom.

“These people recognize that they’re unhappy,” Vance said. “They live in one-bedroom apartments in New York City, they’ve played their entire lives to win a status game, they’re obsessed with their jobs, they’re obsessed with their wealth and with their fortunes, and they look at middle American people who are actually pretty happy with their lives and the choices that they’ve made. And they hate normal Americans for choosing family over these ridiculous DC and New York status games.”

Vance’s comment about “miserable cat ladies” has been sensationalized, drawing unnecessary backlash from celebrities like Jennifer Aniston and liberal media pundits. “When somebody calls out that ‘look, if you’re a miserable cat lady, you should not force your misery on the rest of the country, they just get really upset about it,” Vance said. This honest observation has been twisted to paint him as a misogynist, which is far from the truth.

Vance’s core message is simple: family first. He emphasizes that money and status are secondary to the love and responsibilities towards family. This message, once common wisdom in America, has been overshadowed by the liberal agenda promoting careerism and material wealth as the ultimate goals.

Liberals accuse Vance of misogyny, but his advocacy for American families is clear. “We should worry,” he said, “that in America, family formation, our birth rates, a ton of indicators of family health have collapsed.” This crisis impacts not only media personalities but also the future leadership of the country. Vance argues that those with families are better suited to lead because they have a direct stake in the country’s future.

Senator JD Vance’s comments highlight a crucial issue: the decline of family values in America. His advocacy for pro-family policies is essential for the nation’s future. The liberal media’s attempts to smear him are not only unfounded but also a distraction from the real issues at hand. Vance’s pro-family stance is not an attack on women but a call to prioritize what truly matters – the future of American families and, by extension, the nation itself.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Ever since he dropped out of the race, many Americans have been wondering how much Biden’s health had to do with the decision. But now, it seems we have the answer.

Because the White House has made an astonishing statement regarding Biden’s health being the reason he dropped out.

Biden’s recent decision to step down, officially attributed to a desire to focus on his current duties and unify the Democratic Party, has sparked widespread speculation and controversy, particularly regarding his health and mental fitness.

Despite White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre’s adamant denials, many political analysts and insiders are skeptical of the official narrative. Jean-Pierre emphasized that Biden’s decision “has nothing to do with his health,” and portrayed it as a selfless act for the greater good of the nation and the Democratic Party.

However, the timing and context of the announcement suggest otherwise. Biden’s recent struggles, including a poor performance in the June debate and a bout with COVID-19, have fueled doubts about his capacity to endure the rigors of a second term.

In his letter to the American people, Biden stated, “It has been my intention to seek re-election, but I believe it is best to focus on fulfilling my duties as President for the remainder of my term.”

While this message aims to project strength and dedication, it raises questions about his ability to lead effectively in the face of increasing physical and cognitive challenges.

Even though the official narrative dismisses health concerns as a reason for Biden’s exit, the evidence suggests otherwise. Biden’s public appearances have often been marred by gaffes and moments that raise questions about his mental sharpness.

His recent COVID-19 infection, which forced him into isolation and curtailed his campaign activities, only adds to the speculation.

The president’s age has been a consistent point of contention, with many questioning his ability to handle the stresses of the presidency, let alone a demanding re-election campaign. His fumbling debate performance in June, where he struggled to articulate clear responses and appeared confused at times, significantly damaged his standing within the party and among voters.

Biden’s withdrawal has left the Democratic Party in a state of turmoil. The endorsement of Kamala Harris, while significant, does not guarantee a smooth transition or unity within the party. Harris herself has faced criticism and low approval ratings throughout her tenure as Vice President.

Her leadership on key issues, including immigration and voting rights, has been questioned, and her ability to inspire confidence among the electorate remains uncertain.

The potential candidacies of Gavin Newsom and Gretchen Whitmer highlight the divisions within the party. Both governors are seen as strong leaders with significant accomplishments, but their entry into the race could lead to a contentious primary battle, further weakening the party’s chances in the general election.

For Republicans, Biden’s exit is seen as a major advantage. Trump, with his base solidly behind him, is gearing up for what he expects to be a victorious campaign.

The choice of JD Vance as his running mate is a clear signal of Trump’s intent to solidify his conservative credentials and appeal to the base.

Republicans are poised to capitalize on the perceived weaknesses of the Democratic ticket. Harris’s lack of popularity and the potential for a divided Democratic primary give Trump a clear target.

The narrative of a failing Biden administration will be a central theme of the Republican campaign, and the focus will be on presenting Trump as the candidate of strength, stability, and effective leadership.

As the political landscape adapts to Biden’s unexpected exit, the 2024 presidential race promises to be one of the most dynamic and unpredictable in recent history. Vice President Harris now steps into the spotlight, facing the daunting task of unifying her party and mounting a strong campaign against Trump.

The upcoming months will be critical as both parties navigate public opinion, policy challenges, and the intense scrutiny of a nation divided.

Biden’s decision to bow out may be framed as an act of selflessness and dedication to duty, but the underlying concerns about his health and capability cannot be ignored. The American electorate now stands at a crossroads, faced with stark choices and the weight of history bearing down on the next election.

As the campaign unfolds, the true implications of Biden’s exit will become clearer, shaping the future of American politics for years to come.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Radical Left will do everything they can to get their candidates into power. Even if that means bending the rules.

And now, Democrats have made a shocking move that will ensure their candidate takes the White House.

In a move that underscores the Democratic Party’s growing penchant for circumventing traditional democratic processes, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) has enacted a rule change allowing Vice President Kamala Harris to receive the party’s presidential nomination ahead of the Democratic National Convention (DNC).

This strategic, yet controversial decision, is aimed at streamlining the nomination process to avoid any perception of instability within the party following President Joe Biden’s decision not to seek re-election.

The DNC has planned a virtual roll call in the first week of August to formalize Harris’ nomination. This maneuver, devised back in May, was ostensibly to ensure the Democratic ticket appears on state ballots with early filing deadlines.

However, the reality is that this rule change serves to consolidate power within a select faction of the party, sidelining any potential challengers and undermining the democratic principles the party claims to uphold.

President Biden’s endorsement of Harris as his successor plays a critical role in this scenario, yet the delegates pledged to Biden were not legally bound to support her. The DNC’s preemptive steps to secure Harris’s nomination reveal a troubling willingness to manipulate party rules to ensure a predetermined outcome.

This move effectively stifles any grassroots opposition within the party, demonstrating a top-down imposition of leadership.

This rule change is not without its detractors. Many legal experts have already begun discussing potential challenges to the Democratic Party’s efforts to replace Biden with Harris on state ballots.

here is also significant concern regarding the transfer of Biden’s campaign funds—raised under the premise of his re-election campaign—to Harris’s campaign, raising ethical questions about donor intent and transparency.

Moreover, the requirement for Harris and any potential challengers to submit documentation and secure electronic endorsements from a minimum of 300 delegates by July 30 serves to further entrench her position.

This effectively eliminates any realistic possibility of an intra-party contest, cementing her nomination before the convention even begins.

The DNC’s decision to bypass the traditional nomination process sets a concerning precedent. It reflects a broader trend within the Democratic Party of prioritizing control and predictability over democratic engagement and transparency. This rule change not only undermines the voices of potential challengers but also disenfranchises the party’s base by preemptively shutting down any debate or contest that could emerge from the convention.

For conservatives and Republicans, this maneuver is yet another example of the Democratic Party’s willingness to subvert democratic norms to achieve its goals.

It is imperative to recognize the implications of such actions, which erode the foundational principles of fair and transparent elections. As the political landscape becomes increasingly polarized, the need to uphold democratic integrity becomes ever more critical.

As the DNC prepares for its convention in Chicago, the focus will inevitably shift to Harris’s selection of a running mate. However, the manner in which she secured her nomination will undoubtedly cast a shadow over the proceedings.

The Democratic Party’s attempt to project unity may backfire, exposing deeper rifts within its ranks and potentially alienating segments of its base.

The upcoming convention, set to commence on August 19, will not only formalize Harris’s nomination but also set the tone for the Democratic campaign. It is crucial for conservatives to continue advocating for transparency and adherence to democratic principles, challenging any attempts to undermine the electoral process.

The DNC’s decision to preemptively nominate Kamala Harris is a stark reminder of the lengths to which the Democratic Party will go to maintain control. This move, far from ensuring stability, raises serious questions about the party’s commitment to democratic values and sets a dangerous precedent for future elections.

As we approach the 2024 election, the need for vigilance and accountability has never been more apparent.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

Joe Biden stepping aside as the Democrat nominee surprised some. But others have exposed the Left’s secret plans.

And JD Vance has revealed the truth about Kamala and Joe.

In a powerful campaign appearance in Ohio, Senator JD Vance (R-OH), Vice President Donald Trump’s new running mate, launched a scathing attack on Vice President Kamala Harris, accusing her of deceiving the American public about President Joe Biden’s cognitive and mental decline during his presidency.

Vance’s speech highlighted a growing concern among Republicans about the transparency and truthfulness of the current administration.

During his appearance on Monday, Vance did not mince words. “She signed up for every single one of Joe Biden’s failures and she lied about his mental capacity to serve as president,” Vance declared, capturing the frustrations of many conservatives who feel misled by the current administration.

“Our country has been saddled for 3.5 years with a president who cannot do the job and that’s all because Kamala Harris and the rest of the Democrats lied about his ability to be our president.”

Vance’s remarks reflect a broader sentiment within the Republican Party that the Biden administration, with Harris as a key player, has misled the public on critical issues. The senator’s criticism extended to the entire Democratic establishment, which he accused of conspiring to keep Biden in power despite his apparent struggles.

“I think we should kick them all out come November and replace them with people who care about this country,” Vance added, underscoring the urgency he feels in addressing these issues through the upcoming elections.

One of the most striking parts of Vance’s speech was his claim that “elite Democrats” had been pushing for Biden to step down in favor of Harris. “That is not how it works. That is a threat to democracy, not the Republican Party, which is fighting for democracy every single day,” Vance asserted.

This statement encapsulates a fear that many conservatives share—that the current administration’s actions are undermining the democratic process and the integrity of American institutions.

Vance’s comments come at a time when the Republican Party is gearing up for a highly contentious election season. His assertion that Harris and the Democratic leadership pose a threat to democracy is likely to resonate with voters who are disillusioned with the current state of affairs.

Vance did not stop at criticizing Harris’s alleged deceit. He also took aim at her perceived lack of appreciation for the United States. “If you want to lead this country, you should feel grateful for it, you should feel gratitude and I never hear that when I listen to Kamala Harris,” Vance said.

This critique highlights the truth that Democratic leaders are out of touch with the values and sentiments of everyday Americans.

By highlighting Harris’s supposed lack of gratitude, Vance is drawing a contrast between the Democratic leadership and what he portrays as the patriotic and appreciative nature of Republican leaders. This dichotomy is designed to appeal to voters who feel that their leaders should have a deep respect and love for the country they serve.

In a move aimed at expanding the Republican base, Vance extended an olive branch to Democrats who are disenchanted with the current administration. He assured them that the Republican Party welcomes those who feel “disgusted” by how Biden has been handled as the presumptive nominee. This inclusive approach is part of a broader strategy to unite Americans across party lines who are dissatisfied with the status quo.

Vance’s focus on “forgotten communities” and his emphasis on his rural roots were clear attempts to connect with voters who feel neglected by the political elite. By positioning himself as a champion of these communities, Vance is seeking to build a coalition of support that transcends traditional political divides.

Throughout his speech, Vance reiterated the Republican Party’s commitment to democracy, transparency, and accountability. His criticism of Harris and the Democratic leadership was not just about past actions but also about the future direction of the country. “I think we should kick them all out come November and replace them with people who care about this country,” Vance urged, emphasizing the need for change.

As the 2024 election approaches, the stakes are high. Vance’s candidacy, alongside President Trump, represents a bid to restore what many conservatives see as a lost sense of integrity and competence in the White House. His speech in Ohio was a clarion call to action for Republicans and disillusioned Democrats alike to rally behind a vision of America that prioritizes truth, transparency, and the well-being of all its citizens.

JD Vance’s blistering critique of Kamala Harris is a clear indication of the contentious battle ahead. His accusations of deceit and betrayal are designed to galvanize voters and highlight what he sees as the failures of the current administration.

As the election season heats up, it remains to be seen how these narratives will play out on the national stage. However, one thing is certain: the Republican Party, with Vance at the forefront, is ready to fight for its vision of America.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.