Ever since Joe Biden dropped out of the race, people have been wondering when Harris and Trump will debate. But it seems Harris is scared.
And Kamala Harris has stunned the nation with her newest debate promises.
In a political landscape where transparency and public engagement are paramount, Vice President Kamala Harris’s decision to commit to only one of the three proposed debates with former President Donald Trump has raised eyebrows and questions about her willingness to engage with the American people.
The move, which came after Trump announced his agreement to three debates, has sparked criticism and fueled speculation about Harris’s readiness to lead.
On Thursday, Trump confirmed that he had agreed to three debates: one on September 4th with Fox News, another on September 10th with ABC, and a final one on September 25th with NBC. These debates were set to provide voters with a clear comparison between the two candidates on a national stage, yet Harris has only committed to the September 10th debate.
When pressed by reporters about whether she would participate in all three debates, Harris responded vaguely, “I am looking forward to it,” before quickly pivoting to confirm her attendance at only one debate.
Kamala says she is “looking forward to debating Donald Trump” on September 10, but doesn’t respond when asked about the other two debates.
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) August 8, 2024
This non-committal stance from Harris is not just puzzling; it’s a disservice to the American electorate. In a time when voters are seeking clarity and direct answers from those who wish to lead the nation, Harris’s reluctance to fully engage in these debates signals a concerning avoidance of public scrutiny.
Debates are not merely political theater—they are an essential component of the democratic process, providing a platform for candidates to present their visions, challenge their opponents, and answer the tough questions that the American people deserve to have answered.
Harris’s hesitation to commit to all three debates fits into a broader pattern of avoidance that has marked her campaign since she became the Democratic nominee for president.
In the nearly 20 days since her elevation to the top of the ticket, Harris has failed to hold a single press conference. This is a striking departure from the norm, particularly for a candidate who is now vying for the highest office in the land.
Moreover, Harris has largely avoided engaging with the press, taking only a handful of questions from reporters and refusing to give any interviews. Instead, she has relied on carefully crafted stump speeches, delivered repeatedly without the challenge of follow-up questions or unscripted moments.
This controlled approach may be designed to keep her on message, but it also raises serious concerns about her willingness to engage with the media and, by extension, the American people.
Reports indicate that Harris has provided off-the-record briefings to the reporters traveling with her, but these behind-the-scenes interactions are no substitute for the transparency and accountability that come with public press conferences and interviews.
The American people deserve to hear directly from their candidates, to see them challenged on their policies, and to judge their responses in real-time. By avoiding these opportunities, Harris is denying voters the chance to fully assess her fitness for office.
Harris’s reluctance to engage in multiple debates is particularly troubling given the circumstances surrounding her ascension to the Democratic ticket. The September 10th debate was originally agreed upon by Trump and Joe Biden, who was then the Democratic presidential candidate.
However, with Biden’s abrupt removal from the ticket and Harris’s subsequent elevation, the dynamics of the race have fundamentally changed. Despite this significant shift, Harris has insisted that Trump stick to the debate schedule originally set for Biden.
This insistence on maintaining the previous debate schedule, while simultaneously refusing to commit to the other two debates, suggests a lack of confidence in her ability to face Trump on an equal footing.
If Harris truly believes in the strength of her policies and her ability to lead, she should welcome the opportunity to engage in multiple debates, where she can present her case to the American people and directly contrast her vision with Trump’s.
Harris’s reluctance to engage in more than one debate and her avoidance of the press beg the question: What is she hiding? Is she concerned that her policies will not stand up to the scrutiny of a national audience? Or is she simply unwilling to face the tough questions that inevitably come with a rigorous campaign?
Whatever the reason, Harris’s strategy of avoidance does not inspire confidence. The American people are looking for a leader who is willing to engage openly and honestly, who is not afraid to face challenges head-on, and who is prepared to answer the difficult questions that come with the territory of being president.
By refusing to fully engage in the debate process and by avoiding the press, Harris is sending the opposite message.
Debates are a cornerstone of the democratic process. They offer voters a unique opportunity to see candidates interact with one another, respond to criticisms, and clarify their positions on critical issues.
For many voters, debates are a key factor in deciding which candidate to support. By participating in debates, candidates demonstrate their commitment to transparency, accountability, and the democratic process.
Harris’s decision to sidestep two of the three proposed debates undermines this process. It deprives voters of the chance to see her challenged on her policies and to witness how she handles direct confrontation.
In a race as consequential as the 2024 presidential election, the American people deserve more than carefully scripted speeches and limited engagement. They deserve a candidate who is willing to stand up, face the opposition, and make the case for why they are the best choice to lead the nation.
Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.
