We may be closer to war than many thought. And it’s anybody’s guess when the first shot will be fired.

Now Iran is on lockdown after Trump made this one military threat.

Trump’s Bold Stance on Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions

President Donald Trump issued a stark ultimatum to Iran on Wednesday, vowing to halt its nuclear program by any means necessary. In a candid conversation with syndicated radio host Hugh Hewitt, Trump expressed a preference for diplomacy but did not shy away from harsher measures. “I would much prefer a strong, verified deal,” he said, outlining his hope for a revised nuclear agreement with Tehran.

However, he quickly added a more forceful alternative: “Well, we could actually blow ’em up. Blow ’em up, or just de-nuke ’em.” Trump’s blunt rhetoric underscored the high stakes of the ongoing standoff, as he described the options for handling Iran’s atomic sites: “But there are only two alternatives, blow ’em up nicely or blow ’em up viciously.”

The president’s remarks come amid a renewed push to curb Iran’s nuclear capabilities during his second term. Having withdrawn the U.S. from the Obama-era Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018, Trump is now navigating a delicate diplomatic path.

Three rounds of negotiations, facilitated by Oman’s government and led by Trump’s special Mideast envoy, Steve Witkoff, have already taken place, though a fourth session planned for Rome was recently canceled due to “logistical reasons.”

Diplomatic Push Meets Firm Demands

Trump’s approach blends diplomacy with unwavering demands, as he made clear in an NBC News “Meet The Press” interview on Sunday. He insisted on nothing less than the “total dismantlement” of Iran’s nuclear program, warning that failure to achieve this would mean “the world will be destroyed.”

His zero-tolerance stance reflects deep skepticism about Iran’s intentions, despite Tehran’s claims that its nuclear activities are solely for civilian purposes. “You know, civilian energy often leads to military wars,” Trump remarked, dismissing Iran’s narrative. “And we don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon.”

The U.S. and its allies have long questioned Iran’s assertions, viewing its nuclear advancements as a potential pathway to weaponization.

Trump’s comments signal a refusal to accept ambiguity, positioning complete denuclearization as the only acceptable outcome. This hardline posture sets the tone for ongoing negotiations, with the administration signaling both openness to dialogue and readiness to escalate if necessary.

A Broader Vision for Stability

Vice President JD Vance reinforced the administration’s dual-track approach during remarks at the Munich Leaders Conference on Wednesday. He highlighted the potential for a deal that could integrate Iran into the global economy while ensuring its nuclear ambitions are permanently curtailed.

“There is a deal here that would really bring Iran into the global economy,” Vance said, noting that such an outcome “would be really good for the Iranian people, but would result in the complete cessation of any chance that they can get a nuclear weapon. That’s what we’re negotiating towards.”

Vance framed the diplomatic effort as “Option A,” a pathway that benefits Iran’s populace and even some of its leaders.

However, he was clear about the consequences of failure: “As the President has said, that’s Option A and Option B — if Option A is very good for the Iranian people and even, you know, some of the folks, the leadership in Iran — option B is very bad. It’s very bad for everybody, and it’s not what we want, but it’s better than option C, which is Iran getting a nuclear weapon.”

He emphasized that allowing Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon is “completely off the table for the American administration. No ifs, ands, or buts.” This resolute stance reflects a broader strategy to balance incentives with the threat of severe repercussions, aiming to secure both regional stability and global security.

Obama has been working in the shadows for years. But this could end all of that.

Because RFK Jr. unveiled a shocking truth about Barack Obama that will drop your jaw.

New Call for Justice in RFK Assassination

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has reignited a decades-old quest for truth by urging the Obama administration to investigate an audio recording that allegedly captured the 1968 assassination of his father.

The recording, Kennedy Jr. claims, contains evidence of more gunshots than the convicted assassin’s weapon could have fired. This plea was detailed in a September 2012 letter to then-Attorney General Eric Holder, which surfaced among a vast collection of documents released by the National Archives on Wednesday.

The newly disclosed documents provide a window into the federal probe of Robert F. Kennedy’s tragic death at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles. Kennedy Jr., now a Trump administration official, sought to challenge the official narrative surrounding the June 6, 1968, killing.

His request for “a new investigation” underscores lingering doubts about the circumstances of his father’s murder, a case that has long fueled speculation and debate.

Key Evidence and Allies

Kennedy Jr.’s push for answers was bolstered by Paul Schrade, a former United Auto Workers vice president who was wounded in the attack. “He was standing beside my father when Daddy was killed and Paul was himself wounded by a bullet,” Kennedy Jr. wrote in his letter to Holder, emphasizing Schrade’s personal stake in the case.

Schrade, alongside a team of prominent attorneys, including former U.S. Attorney Rob Bonner, argued that the audio evidence is compelling enough to warrant a fresh investigation. “Paul and his team of nationally prominent attorneys strongly believe this new evidence is conclusive and requires a new investigation. I agree and support his request for a new investigation,” Kennedy Jr. affirmed.

Details of the Disputed Audio

The audio in question, recorded by a journalist at the scene, is central to Schrade’s claims. He contends it reveals “two gunmen fired at least 13 shots from two different .22 caliber revolvers and from opposing directions.”

This stands in contrast to the official account, which holds that Sirhan Sirhan, the convicted assassin, acted alone using an eight-shot .22 caliber Iver Johnson revolver. Schrade insists Sirhan had no opportunity to reload during the chaotic incident, raising questions about the possibility of a second shooter.

The released records show that Kennedy Jr.’s request prompted action from the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office, which launched an inquiry into the audio evidence. The tape was sent to the FBI’s Digital Evidence Laboratory in Quantico, Virginia, for detailed analysis. However, the results were inconclusive.

“The designated area recorded on specimen Q1 was of insufficient quality to definitively classify the impulse events as gunshots,” the FBI’s May 13, 2013, report noted. The report further stated that investigators could not “confirm the number of gunshots or determine the identification of specific weapon(s)” based on the recording.

Broader Context of Declassification

The release of these documents stems from President Trump’s Jan. 23 executive order, which called for the declassification of records related to the assassinations of Robert F. Kennedy, President John F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr.

This move has reignited public interest in these pivotal moments in American history, offering researchers and advocates new material to explore. For Kennedy Jr. and Schrade, the files represent a chance to revisit a case that has haunted their lives and the nation’s conscience for over half a century.

Vance has been making his rounds around the world. Now he’s ready to tell all.

And JD Vance spilled a devastating secret that proves what we all already knew.

Forging a Path to Lasting Peace

Vice President JD Vance, embodying the Trump administration’s bold leadership, has outlined a pragmatic strategy to resolve the Ukraine-Russia conflict, emphasizing diplomacy to secure a durable peace.

Speaking at the Munich Leaders Meeting in Washington, Vance acknowledged Russia’s stringent demands but expressed confidence that both nations could find common ground under Trump’s guidance.

“The step that we would like to make right now, is we would like both the Russians and the Ukrainians to actually agree on some basic guidelines for sitting down and talking to one another,” Vance said here Wednesday at the Munich Leaders Meeting in Washington.

“We think that if cool heads prevail here, we can bring this thing to a durable peace that will be economically beneficial for both Ukrainians and the Russians,” Vance added during a discussion with Ambassador Wolfgang Ischinger, president of the Foundation Council of the Munich Security Conference and former German ambassador to the U.S.

Advancing Trump’s Long-Term Strategy

Russia’s conditions include blocking Ukraine’s NATO membership, barring foreign peacekeepers post-conflict, and adjusting Ukraine’s borders. While Ukraine supports a 30-day ceasefire, Russia has rejected it.

Vance underscored the Trump administration’s focus on comprehensive, long-term solutions, reflecting President Trump’s commitment to results over fleeting gestures.

“We’ve tried to move beyond the obsession with the 30-day ceasefire, and more on what the long-term settlement look like, and we’ve tried to consistently advance the ball,” Vance said.

True to Trump’s “America First” doctrine, Vance urged European nations to boost defense spending and take charge of their security.

Echoing his February remarks at the Munich Security Conference, he called on Europe to “step up in a big way to provide for its own defense,” warning that internal challenges like censorship and illegal immigration outweigh external threats from Russia or China.

Some European leaders, including German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius, pushed back, misinterpreting Trump’s call for strength as a critique of their governance.

Strengthening NATO Through Trump’s Leadership

The discussion comes as Ischinger warned that European-led peacekeeping in Ukraine without U.S. involvement could destabilize NATO. He cautioned that if the U.K. and France deploy peacekeepers, Russia might escalate tensions, leaving European forces vulnerable.

“And therefore the Europeans in Ukraine would possibly be shot at, and would need to reply, to engage without the United States on their side,” Ischinger said. “Quite frankly, that would be the end of NATO as we know it.”

Vance’s advocacy for a negotiated peace and European self-reliance highlights the Trump administration’s resolve to fortify global alliances while prioritizing American interests.

Under Trump’s leadership, the U.S. is steering the Ukraine-Russia conflict toward a resolution that strengthens stability and reasserts NATO’s unity.

Trump has always had plenty of tricks up his sleeve. But this came straight out of left field.

Now President Trump flipped the script in a way that left Democrats dumbfounded.

Halting Risky Overseas Virus Research

President Donald Trump took decisive action on Monday, signing an executive order to end federal funding for gain-of-function research in high-risk nations like China, where Covid-19 is widely believed to have emerged.

The directive zeroes in on “countries of concern,” such as Iran, and others with lax oversight of biological experiments, according to a White House fact sheet. By targeting research that modifies viruses to become more infectious or deadly, the order aims to prevent another catastrophic pandemic.

“It can leak out, like from Wuhan. . . . I think I said that right from Day One,” Trump declared in the Oval Office, reaffirming his long-held stance. “I’ve never changed that opinion.”

Targeting Wuhan’s Legacy and Lab Leaks

The executive order specifically cites the bat coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, funded through EcoHealth Alliance, as a driving force behind this policy shift. The White House emphasizes the need to shield Americans from lab leaks, like the one researchers suspect sparked the 1977 Russian flu.

Trump was joined by key allies, including NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, coauthor of the 2020 Great Barrington Declaration opposing lockdowns, and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a vocal critic of Covid-19 vaccines and restrictions.

“There’s no laboratory that’s immune from leaks — and this is going to prevent those kinds of inadvertent leaks from happening in the future and endangering humanity,” Kennedy stated, noting the $25 trillion global cost and 20 million lives lost to Covid-19.

Strengthening Oversight and Accountability

The order introduces robust enforcement and reporting mechanisms to tighten biosafety and biosecurity standards, aiming to “discourage subjective interpretation of policies that researchers have used in the past,” per the White House.

This move follows assessments by the FBI, Department of Energy, and CIA, which concluded the Covid-19 pandemic likely stemmed from a Wuhan lab leak, with the CIA endorsing this theory shortly after Trump’s January inauguration.

In contrast, former NIAID Director Anthony Fauci and NIH Director Francis Collins pushed a zoonotic origin in 2020, a stance later undermined as they admitted the lab leak theory’s plausibility during congressional probes led by Representative James Comer (R., Ky.).

Congressional Backing and Public Protection

Comer, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, hailed Trump’s action, which bans taxpayer-funded gain-of-function research across the government. “Every American should be outraged that their hard-earned tax dollars were used by mad scientists to engineer more deadly and transmissible coronaviruses,” Comer said, praising the administration’s focus on public health and safety.

The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, under Comer’s leadership, conducted a two-year investigation, securing testimony from Fauci and Collins that debunked earlier dismissals of the lab leak hypothesis.

Trump, visibly moved after Kennedy’s remarks, said he was “very honored” to sign the order, framing it as a critical step to prevent future pandemics and protect Americans from reckless science abroad.

America’s enemies are hard at work. They won’t sleep until we’re on our knees.

Now this foreign government was caught red-handed funneling terrorists into America.

Maduro’s Role in Fueling Tren de Aragua’s U.S. Infiltration

A recent intelligence assessment exposes how Venezuelan officials under Nicolas Maduro have “facilitated” the illegal migration of Tren de Aragua (TdA), a ruthless criminal gang, into the United States, aligning with Maduro’s apparent aim to “destabilize governments and undermine public safety.”

The April memo from the National Intelligence Council, released by the ODNI, reveals a troubling permissiveness, noting that “the Maduro regime probably is not systematically directing Venezuelan outflows, such as to sow chaos in receiving countries.”

This softens an earlier FBI claim that Maduro directly orchestrates TdA’s U.S. operations, suggesting a more opportunistic chaos.

Over 600 Venezuelan migrants with likely TdA ties, crossing illegally during Joe Biden’s presidency, have been flagged by the Department of Homeland Security.

TdA’s Crimes Enabled by Venezuela’s Sanctuary

The Maduro regime’s complicity is stark, providing TdA a safe haven that “aiding and abetting their crimes and terrorist activities against the United States by enabling them to thrive.”

The gang’s brutality surfaced in heinous acts like the June 2024 r*pe and murder of 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray in Texas by two TdA illegal aliens, and an August 2024 armed takeover of a Colorado apartment complex caught on video.

The intelligence report cites unverified claims that Maduro allies, including Diosdado Cabello and Iris Varela, “have cooperated with TDA by providing financial or materiel support.”

Local officials, including military personnel, allegedly tip off TdA about raids or patrols, as seen in a 2023 prison operation, highlighting a corrupt ecosystem where “mid- to low-level Venezuelan officials probably profit from TDA’s illicit activities.”

A Complex Web of Cooperation and Negligence

While the Maduro regime’s ties to TdA involve “an uneasy mix of cooperation and confrontation rather than top-down directives,” the government’s inaction fosters chaos.

“Maduro regime leadership probably sometimes tolerates TDA’s presence in Venezuela, and some government officials may cooperate with TDA for financial gain,” the report notes, warning that “sources could also be motivated to fabricate information.”

Venezuela’s overstretched security forces, lacking territorial control, often opt for uneasy alliances with armed groups like TdA to maintain influence, as “combatting such groups often results in personnel losses.”

Maduro’s refusal to curb migration, which has plummeted 80% since January, underscores his strategy: dissidents leave, remittances flow, and the U.S. grapples with the fallout.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasized, “Whether TdA exclusively murders, smuggles drugs, and traffics illegal immigrants over our borders on the orders of Venezuelan leaders, or freelances for self-enrichment is beside the point,” pointing to Maduro’s role in fostering TdA’s growth to harm U.S. interests, a factor in the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act for deportations.

The world is watching with bated breath. Who knows how this will all end up?

Because Vladimir Putin made a nuclear threat that put the Pentagon on total lockdown.

Putin’s Nuclear Saber-Rattling Escalates Tensions

Russian President Vladimir Putin issued a chilling warning on state television Sunday, expressing hope that Russia would not need to resort to nuclear weapons against Ukraine while refusing to rule out their use.

The provocative remarks, made amid Moscow’s ongoing war that began in 2022, underscore the Kremlin’s aggressive posture and highlight the urgency of President Donald Trump’s efforts to broker peace. Putin’s comments came in response to questions about Ukrainian strikes on Russian territory, particularly following attacks on Kursk that prompted him to lower the threshold for nuclear deployment last year.

“They wanted to provoke us so that we made mistakes,” Putin said, according to a translation. “There has been no need to use those weapons … and I hope they will not be required. We have enough strength and means to bring what was started in 2022 to a logical conclusion with the outcome Russia requires.”

Ukrainian Ambassador to the US Oksana Markarova condemned Putin’s rhetoric, urging the international community to take his threats seriously. “At this point, it doesn’t matter how we interpret what he says,” Markarova told CBS News’ “Face the Nation” on Sunday.

“We just have to believe what he says and understand what he says. He is a threat, not only to Ukraine but also to anyone who believes that nations should live peacefully.”

Trump’s Bold Diplomacy Faces Obstacles

President Trump has championed a diplomatic resolution to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, seeking to avert further escalation and stabilize the region. His efforts, however, face significant challenges, as he acknowledged in a candid interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press” aired Sunday. Reflecting on the deep animosity between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump expressed skepticism about the feasibility of a swift agreement. “Maybe it’s not possible to do,” Trump told NBC.

“There’s tremendous hatred, just so you understand, Kristen. We’re talking tremendous hatred between these two men [Putin and Zelensky] and between, you know, some of the soldiers, frankly. Between the generals.”

Trump’s frustration stems from Russia’s rejection of a comprehensive cease-fire and its intensified attacks on Ukrainian civilians, which drew sharp rebuke from the president. Despite a Russian proposal for a limited pause in strikes on energy infrastructure and a temporary cease-fire from May 8 to 10 to commemorate the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany, progress remains elusive.

Trump’s proactive approach, including a recent $50 million weapons package to Ukraine and a new mineral rights agreement, demonstrates his commitment to supporting Ukraine while pursuing a negotiated end to the conflict.

Russia’s Territorial Ambitions Meet Trump’s Resolve

Putin’s claim that reconciliation with Ukraine is “inevitable” contrasts with Russia’s ongoing struggle to secure control over the annexed territories of Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk, and Zaporizhzhia, none of which Moscow fully dominates.

The Kremlin’s ambitions, rooted in its 2014 annexation of Crimea, face fierce Ukrainian resistance and international condemnation. Trump’s administration has responded with a balanced strategy, combining military aid with diplomatic pressure to counter Russia’s aggression and protect global stability.

The president’s earlier clash with Zelensky in February, where he accused the Ukrainian leader of risking World War III, reflects Trump’s no-nonsense approach to leadership in this crisis.

By prioritizing peace talks while maintaining support for Ukraine, Trump aims to outmaneuver Putin’s belligerence and restore order to a volatile region. His efforts stand as a testament to his vision of a strong, secure world order, undeterred by the complexities of entrenched hatred and territorial disputes.

The Left is already on shaky ground. But now the floor is giving out.

Because a bombshell report exposed one secret about Democrats that is destroying the entire party.

Biden’s Aides Sidestep Cognitive Test to Shield Campaign

A revealing new book, “2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America,” exposes the Biden administration’s decision to forgo a cognitive test for President Joe Biden in February 2024, driven by fears that the mere act of testing would amplify concerns about his age.

Authored by journalists Tyler Pager, Josh Dawsey, and Isaac Arnsdorf, the book, set for release in July, highlights the internal debates within Biden’s inner circle as they grappled with public perceptions of the then-81-year-old president’s fitness.

This strategic choice, made months before Biden’s faltering debate performance against President Donald Trump, underscores the vulnerabilities that ultimately paved the way for Trump’s triumphant return to the White House.

“At the same time, Mr. Biden’s longtime doctor, Kevin O’Connor, had told aides he would not take the 81-year-old president’s political standing into consideration when treating him,” The New York Times reported, citing the book. Despite confidence that Biden would pass, aides opted against the test, wary of fueling narratives that could undermine his re-election bid.

Age Concerns Amplified by Special Counsel and Allies

The decision to skip the cognitive test coincided with mounting scrutiny over Biden’s age, intensified by Special Counsel Robert Hur’s February 2024 report on Biden’s mishandling of classified documents.

Hur’s description of Biden as “a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory” struck a chord with voters, raising doubts about his capacity to lead. The timing—weeks before Biden’s White House physical exam—made the test debate a high-stakes moment for his team, who feared any misstep could bolster Trump’s narrative of a revitalized, vigorous leadership.

The book also recounts a heated 2022 exchange between Biden’s then-chief of staff, Ron Klain, and former Obama aide David Axelrod. After Axelrod warned in a Times report that Biden’s age—nearing 90 by the end of a second term—posed “a major issue,” Klain confronted him.

“That comment prompted an angry call to Mr. Axelrod from Ron Klain, then Mr. Biden’s chief of staff, according to the book. Mr. Klain wanted to know why Mr. Axelrod was fueling doubts about a Democratic president who was on track to begin a re-election campaign,” the Times noted.

Klain pressed Axelrod, saying, “There’s no Obama out there, Axe. Who’s going to do it if he doesn’t do it?” This exchange reveals the Democrats’ lack of a clear successor, a weakness Trump capitalized on in 2024.

Biden’s Debate Prep Exposed Fatigue and Disengagement

Another book, “Uncharted: How Trump Beat Biden, Harris, and the Odds in the Wildest Campaign in History” by Chris Whipple, paints a stark picture of Biden’s condition leading up to his June 2024 debate with Trump.

Ron Klain, who left his White House role but assisted with debate prep, described Biden as “fatigued, befuddled and disengaged.” Whipple writes that at a prep session in Aspen Lodge, Klain “was startled. He’d never seen him so exhausted and out of it. Biden was unaware of what was happening in his own campaign. Halfway through the session, the president excused himself and went off to sit by the pool.”

This account of Biden’s disengagement contrasts sharply with Trump’s high-energy campaign, which resonated with voters seeking decisive leadership.

The revelations from these books highlight the Biden team’s struggle to manage perceptions of his age and vitality, a battle they ultimately lost to Trump’s relentless focus on strength and renewal.

As the 2024 election underscored, voters favored Trump’s vision of a reinvigorated America over a Democratic leadership hampered by internal doubts and visible frailties.

Trump is winning left and right. And it’s only getting better.

Now the House Freedom Caucus dropped Donald Trump’s jaw with one unprecedented gift.

A Bold Break from the Swamp: Trump’s Budget Triumph

President Donald Trump’s transformative budget proposal has ignited enthusiasm among the House Freedom Caucus, heralded as a decisive blow against Washington’s entrenched bureaucracy. Dubbed “a paradigm shift” by the conservative group, the plan aligns with the America First agenda, slashing wasteful spending while prioritizing national security and the needs of everyday Americans.

The Freedom Caucus celebrated the strategy, emphasizing its potential to dismantle the influence of liberal elites.

“This is how you break the Swamp. Passing MAGA Republican priorities in reconciliation with Republican votes — ending Democrats’s leverage against the President in appropriations to fund the Left’s wasteful, woke and weaponized bureaucracy. The FY26 budget is a paradigm shift,” the Freedom Caucus proclaimed on X, underscoring Trump’s commitment to reshaping federal priorities.

By sidelining Democratic obstruction, the proposal empowers Republicans to deliver on campaign promises, restoring fiscal sanity and national strength.

Prioritizing Defense and Security: A Pro-American Vision

Trump’s budget boldly redirects resources to bolster America’s defenses and secure its borders, while slashing non-defense discretionary spending by 22.6% to $163 billion, as outlined by Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought.

“Trump is proposing base non-defense discretionary budget authority (of) $163 billion, 22.6 percent below current-year spending, while still protecting funding for homeland security, veterans, seniors, law enforcement, and infrastructure,” Vought wrote to Senate Committee on Appropriations Chair Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine.

The plan allocates a robust $1.01 trillion for defense, a 13% increase, and commits a historic $175 billion to fortify border security.

“For Defense spending, the President proposes an increase of 13 percent to $1.01 trillion for FY 2026; for Homeland Security, the Budget commits a historic $175 billion investment to, at long last, fully secure our border,” Vought explained.

By leveraging reconciliation for at least $325 billion, Trump ensures that the military and border agencies are fully equipped to protect the nation, a move hailed as a long-overdue response to unchecked immigration and global threats.

Freedom Caucus Champions Trump’s Fiscal Revolution

The House Freedom Caucus has rallied behind Trump’s vision, with members like Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) praising its alignment with the will of the American people.

“This budget re-aligns federal spending to the priorities of the people: a secure nation, making America healthy again, a Justice Department combatting crime and not weaponized against the people, and common sense,” Roy declared.

He highlighted the budget’s synergy with efforts to extend Trump’s tax cuts, reform Medicaid, and reduce deficits, promising “prosperity, freedom, and strength” for Americans.

Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) called it “a game-changing budget,” asserting on X that it “is exactly what Republicans were elected to deliver: securing the homeland, cutting the federal government, and crippling the deep state.”

Similarly, Rep. Barry Moore (R-Ala.) lauded the proposal as “a bold step toward fiscal responsibility,” reflecting the Caucus’s unified support for Trump’s aggressive push to dismantle bloated bureaucracies and restore accountability.

With this budget, Trump and his allies are poised to deliver a leaner, stronger government that puts America first, setting the stage for a new era of economic and national revitalization.

The media painted Trump as a maniac. Now he may just pull off a stunning victory.

Because Chinese officials gave away the game with a major concession given to Donald Trump.

Trump’s Tough Stance Forces China’s Hand on Fentanyl

President Donald Trump’s unwavering resolve in confronting China’s role in the fentanyl epidemic is yielding results, as Beijing scrambles to clarify its position and seek trade talks. A Chinese official has reportedly reached out to the Trump administration, eager to understand the precise steps the U.S. expects to halt the flow of deadly fentanyl precursors fueling America’s opioid crisis.

This move follows Trump’s strategic imposition of a robust 145% tariff on Chinese imports, including a targeted 20% levy aimed at pressuring China to crack down on its chemical industry’s complicity in the drug trade. The tariffs underscore Trump’s commitment to protecting American lives and restoring economic fairness.

“China deserves it,” Trump declared, defending the tariffs as a necessary response to Beijing’s failure to act decisively. “We’re not going to let them destroy our country with drugs and unfair trade.”

While China’s Ministry of Commerce expressed cautious openness to dialogue, insisting that the U.S. “show sincerity” and reconsider its tariffs, Trump’s bold approach has clearly shifted the dynamic, compelling Beijing to confront the fentanyl issue head-on. “If the United States wants to talk, it should show its sincerity and be prepared to correct its wrong practices and cancel the unilateral tariffs,” the ministry stated, a sign that Trump’s pressure is forcing China to the negotiating table.

Fentanyl Fight: Trump’s Tariffs as a Patriotic Tool

The fentanyl crisis, which claims countless American lives annually, has become a cornerstone of Trump’s trade strategy, with China’s chemical exports to Mexican cartels under intense scrutiny. The White House has been unequivocal: “China plays the central role in the fentanyl crisis that is destroying American lives,” as stated in a February release announcing the initial 10% tariff increase.

Trump’s subsequent escalation to 145% tariffs demonstrates his resolve to hold Beijing accountable, rejecting half-measures like China’s 2019 scheduling of fentanyl analogs, which U.S. officials argue have been undermined by ongoing precursor shipments.

Beijing’s response, including a vague offer to schedule more precursors, has been met with skepticism by Trump’s team, who demand concrete action.

“If (the U.S.) truly wants to address the fentanyl problem, it needs to revoke the unjustified tariffs, engage in equal consultation with China, and seek mutually beneficial cooperation,” said Liu, a Chinese embassy spokesman.

Yet, Trump’s tariffs have already disrupted China’s complacency, with reports indicating Beijing is preparing a new fentanyl-related proposal to ease trade tensions. This development highlights Trump’s ability to leverage economic might to safeguard American communities from foreign-enabled drug scourge.

America First: Trump’s Tariffs Reshape Global Trade

Trump’s tariffs have not only pressured China but also sent a powerful message to the world: America will no longer tolerate unfair trade practices that harm its workers and families. Despite China’s retaliatory 125% duties on U.S. goods and threats to limit Hollywood access or fentanyl cooperation, Trump remains steadfast, prioritizing American interests.

The global market has felt the ripple effects, with cancellations of 30% of U.S.-bound shipments from China reported by German shipper Hapag-Lloyd, but Trump’s supporters see this as a necessary step to level the playing field.

“We are going to have a fair deal with China,” Trump assured reporters, signaling confidence in his strategy to secure both trade equity and progress on fentanyl. While China’s state media, like China Daily, touts “global unity” against Trump’s policies, the reality is clear: Beijing’s willingness to negotiate reflects the effectiveness of Trump’s America First agenda.

“Global unity can triumph over trade tyranny,” China Daily claimed, but it’s Trump’s bold leadership that’s driving the conversation, ensuring that America’s safety and prosperity come first in this high-stakes showdown.

The Bidens have escaped justice for too long. But now everything is shaken up.

Because Hunter Biden made a sudden legal move that put Republicans on notice.

Hunter Biden Backs Down from IRS Lawsuit

Hunter Biden has abruptly abandoned his high-profile lawsuit against the IRS, which accused whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler of unlawfully exposing his private taxpayer information. The move comes as a significant retreat for Biden, whose legal battles have drawn intense scrutiny amid allegations of tax violations and questionable foreign business dealings.

Biden initiated the lawsuit after Shapley and Ziegler publicly criticized IRS and Department of Justice officials for allegedly stalling investigations into his financial activities. The whistleblowers, undeterred by Biden’s legal maneuver, stood firm.

“It’s always been clear that the lawsuit was an attempt to intimidate us. However, we were always motivated by doing the right thing, defending our work, and honoring our duty to the American people. Intimidation and retaliation were never going to work,” Shapley and Ziegler said in a statement.

They added, “We truly wanted our day in court to provide the complete story, but it appears Mr. Biden was afraid to actually fight this case in a court of law after all. His voluntary dismissal of the case tells you everything you need to know about who was right and who was wrong.”

Whistleblowers Triumph as Biden’s Claims Crumble

Shapley and Ziegler, represented by a formidable team of seven attorneys with expertise in federal prosecutions and congressional matters, were poised to intervene as defendants in the lawsuit to robustly counter Biden’s accusations. Their legal team celebrated the dismissal as a clear victory.

“Today, in the midst of Gary Shapley’s and Joe Ziegler’s efforts to intervene in this litigation and in exchange for nothing at all, Hunter Biden dismissed his case with prejudice—meaning he can never bring it again,” the whistleblowers’ legal team stated. “Shapley and Ziegler did nothing wrong, never had to seek a pardon, and the legality of their actions have now been entirely vindicated in a federal court of law once again.”

The lawsuit’s collapse marks another blow to Biden’s aggressive legal campaign, which has included a now-dropped suit against former Trump staffer Garrett Ziegler over a database of Biden’s laptop contents.

Biden cited financial struggles in court filings, noting that his book and art sales have plummeted since late 2023, a period that aligns with intensified House GOP investigations and his prosecution on gun and tax charges by special counsel David Weiss.

Broader Implications: Biden Family Scrutiny Intensifies

The dismissed IRS lawsuit was a key component of Hunter Biden’s efforts to deflect accountability amid revelations from the House GOP’s impeachment inquiry into his father, then-President Joe Biden.

The inquiry uncovered over $27 million in payments from foreign sources to Hunter Biden and his associates during and after his father’s vice presidency, alongside numerous interactions between Joe Biden and his son’s business partners. Shapley and Ziegler’s disclosures, backed by extensive documentation provided to the House Ways and Means Committee, were central to these findings.

The whistleblowers faced significant backlash for their courage, with an independent watchdog confirming they endured unlawful retaliation from the IRS after coming forward in spring 2023. Despite this, their credibility has been bolstered, with the Trump administration appointing them to senior advisory roles at the Treasury Department in March. Shapley briefly served as acting IRS Commissioner last month before a dispute led to his removal.

Meanwhile, President Trump has taken decisive actions, stripping Hunter Biden of his Secret Service detail and granting clemency to Biden’s former business partners, Devon Archer and Jason Galanis, who testified during the impeachment probe.

Joe Biden, in his final days as president, issued pardons for his son—convicted on gun charges in June and pleading guilty to tax charges in September—as well as other family members, shielding them from potential Trump administration actions. Hunter Biden’s decision to drop the IRS lawsuit signals a retreat, leaving the whistleblowers’ allegations unchallenged and their vindication resounding.

Harris has lost her mind. She can’t take the fact that she lost.

Now she went completely off the rails during her word salad speech.

Kamala Harris’ Confusing Comeback: A Speech Riddled with Incoherence

Once a prominent figure in the Biden administration, Kamala Harris has resurfaced after months of political silence, attempting to rally progressives with a speech that quickly unraveled into a bewildering tangent about elephants.

Speaking at Emerge’s 20th anniversary gala in San Francisco, the former vice president took aim at President Trump but struggled to maintain a coherent narrative, resorting to her characteristic word salads and cackles.

“A lot of folks are wondering what’s going to guide us through this moment. How are we all going to figure out how to chart the course?” Harris said, before veering off-topic. “Please allow me, friends, to digress for a moment.”

“OK, it’s kind of dark in here, but I’m ask[ing] for a show of hands — who saw that video from a couple of weeks ago, the one of the elephants at the San Diego Zoo during the earthquake? Google it if you’ve not seen it,” she said with a cackle. Harris went on to describe how the elephants “felt the earth shaking beneath their feet” and “got in a circle and stood next to each other to protect the most vulnerable.”

“What a powerful metaphor,” she claimed, attempting to tie the anecdote to political unity. Yet the detour only underscored her tendency to lose focus, leaving attendees puzzled as she meandered through a speech meant to critique Trump’s presidency.

Hypocrisy and Hyperbole: Harris’ Attacks on Trump Fall Flat

Harris painted a grim picture of America under Trump, accusing him of sparking “the greatest manmade economic crisis in modern presidential history” and orchestrating a “wholesale abandonment” of American values. Her rhetoric, laced with apocalyptic warnings, seemed designed to inflame rather than inspire.

“Americans across the political spectrum who are declaring that the president’s reckless tariffs hurt workers and families by raising the cost of everyday essentials, devastate the retirement accounts that people spent a lifetime paying into, and paralyze American businesses, large and small,” Harris said.

Yet her claims conveniently ignored the economic pressures inherited from her own administration, including persistent inflation and supply chain woes that plagued the Biden-Harris years.

She further accused Trump of flouting presidential norms, warning of a looming constitutional crisis. “We here know that when the checks and balances ultimately collapse, if Congress fails to do its part, or if the courts fail to do their part, or if both do their part but the president defies them anyway … that is called a constitutional crisis,” she lamented. Critics, however, might argue that Harris’ own tenure as vice president saw plenty of executive overreach, casting her as an inconsistent messenger.

Harris also took aim at Trump’s immigration policies, specifically referencing the deportation of alleged MS-13 gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador. “It is not OK to violate court orders,” she said.

“It is not OK to detain or disappear American citizens or anyone without due process.” Her selective outrage, however, glosses over the Biden-Harris administration’s own struggles with border security and immigration enforcement, which many argue emboldened criminal elements.

A Fading Star Clings to Relevance

After her 2024 election loss, Harris has kept a low profile, with speculation swirling about her next move—perhaps a run for California governor in 2026 or another presidential bid in 2028. Her speech offered no clarity on her plans, instead serving as a platform for vague calls to action and recycled progressive talking points.

“I am not here tonight to offer all the answers, but I am here to say this: Things are probably going to get worse before they get better,” she proclaimed. “But we are ready for it. We are not going to scatter.” The rallying cry felt hollow, delivered by a figure whose political star has dimmed amid criticism of her ineffectiveness as vice president.

Harris’ attempt to reassert herself as a progressive leader fell short, overshadowed by her disjointed delivery and questionable priorities. As she decried Trump’s crackdown on universities as “unconstitutional demands that threaten the pursuit of truth and academic independence,” one couldn’t help but wonder if her focus on viral animal videos and exaggerated crises reflects a disconnect from the issues Americans care about most. For now, Harris’ comeback seems more like a stumble, leaving her audience—and the nation—questioning her relevance.

Harris has been trying to lay low. But she keeps being thrust back into the spotlight.

Now Tim Walz just obliterated the last remaining bits of Kamala Harris’ career.

Walz’s ‘Code Talk’ Claim Sparks Conservative Ridicule

Former Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz has ignited a firestorm of mockery from conservatives after asserting that he was selected as Kamala Harris’s running mate to “code talk to white guys” and sway rural voters.

Speaking at a Harvard Kennedy School forum during his national “listening tour” on Monday, the Minnesota governor claimed his role was to connect with “white guys watching football, fixing their truck” and “put them at ease.”

The remarks, meant to explain his place on the losing 2024 ticket, instead drew sharp derision from critics who saw them as a misstep in the Democrats’ failed bid to broaden their appeal.

Walz further described himself as a “permission structure” designed to win over white men in rural America, a demographic that overwhelmingly supported President Donald Trump.

However, his attempt to position himself as a relatable everyman fell flat, with conservatives seizing the opportunity to highlight the Democrats’ disconnect with the very voters Walz claimed to represent.

The backlash underscored the challenges Democrats face in shedding their elitist image, a narrative Republicans have relentlessly exploited to maintain their grip on rural and working-class voters.

Social Media and GOP Leaders Pile On

The conservative response was swift and merciless, with social media users and Republican figures mocking Walz’s self-proclaimed ability to “code talk” to white men.

One X user jabbed, “Tampon Tim Walz thought white guys watching football and fixing their truck would listen to him and vote for Kamala,” referencing the controversial nickname tied to Walz’s policy mandating menstrual products in Minnesota public schools for grades 4 through 12.

The quip encapsulated the skepticism that Walz’s folksy persona failed to resonate as intended.

Republican Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) joined the fray, declaring, “Tim Walz is DELUSIONAL!” His blunt assessment amplified the conservative narrative that Walz’s outreach was not only ineffective but also emblematic of the Democrats’ tone-deaf approach to rural voters.

Conservative pundit Charlie Kirk piled on, writing, “Tim Walz says Kamala picked him as a running mate to give ‘permission’ for white dudes to vote for a radical black/Indian woman.” Kirk’s follow-up, “How’d that work out for you, Tim?!” drove home the point that Walz’s strategy failed to deliver, as the Harris-Walz ticket fell short against Trump’s populist surge.

Democrats’ Rural Disconnect Laid Bare

Walz’s comments at Harvard, intended to reflect on his role in the 2024 campaign, instead highlighted the Democratic Party’s ongoing struggle to connect with white, working-class men—a demographic that has increasingly aligned with the GOP under Trump’s leadership.

By framing himself as a cultural translator for rural voters, Walz inadvertently invited scrutiny of the Democrats’ broader electoral miscalculations, particularly their inability to counter Republican narratives painting them as out-of-touch urban elites.

The mockery directed at Walz also reflects the broader conservative glee at the Democratic ticket’s defeat, with critics gleefully pointing to the “code talk” claim as evidence of a flawed strategy.

As Democrats lick their wounds and reassess their approach ahead of future elections, Walz’s remarks serve as a cautionary tale of the risks of leaning into stereotypes to appeal to voters. With Republicans like Emmer and Kirk capitalizing on the gaffe to further erode Democratic credibility, Walz’s “listening tour” has instead amplified the GOP’s narrative of Democratic desperation and cultural cluelessness.