The Radical Left is getting more and more violent and extreme. But this time they took it too far.

Because a radical protestor has assaulted a veteran during this terrifying attack.

The recent assault on Scott Hayes, a pro-Israel demonstrator in Newton, Massachusetts, is another chilling example of how the radical left’s anti-Israel rhetoric has emboldened violence and intolerance.

Caleb Gannon, the man accused of tackling Hayes during a peaceful protest, has a history of extreme views on social media, calling for the destruction of the United States and refusing to condemn the terrorist group Hamas. This disturbing incident is a wake-up call for anyone still in doubt about the dangers posed by the rising tide of anti-Israel sentiment within far-left circles.

Caleb Gannon, 31, was caught on video charging across the street and violently tackling Scott Hayes, a peaceful pro-Israel protester. The footage, first released by The Daily Wire, shows Gannon attacking Hayes, who, in self-defense, fired a single shot, injuring his assailant. Hayes immediately tended to Gannon’s wounds until emergency personnel arrived, demonstrating a level of humanity and care that stands in stark contrast to the radical ideologies driving this attack.

While the initial motivations for Gannon’s actions were unclear, a review of his social media history revealed a disturbing pattern of extremism. Gannon, who openly supports Hamas, has called for the destruction of the United States, referring to it as a “rogue terrorist organization.” He advocates for the dismantling of police stations, military bases, and government offices, with the resources to be “redirected back into their communities.”

Caleb Gannon, the man who tackled Scott Hayes and was shot, has a X history of calling for the destruction of America and says he does not condemn Hamas. pic.twitter.com/t11GcY5eFv

— Kassy Akiva (@KassyAkiva) September 13, 2024

These extreme and anti-American views are deeply concerning, but they are not an anomaly. They reflect a broader, dangerous trend within the radical left—one that tolerates and even promotes hate, so long as that hate is directed at the right targets: Israel, the United States, and anyone who dares to disagree with their worldview.

The left often prides itself on being a movement of “tolerance” and “inclusivity,” but incidents like this expose the hypocrisy at the core of that claim. The truth is, the radical left only tolerates those who agree with them. If you’re pro-Israel, pro-America, or even simply someone who dares to think independently, you become a target for their vitriol.

Gannon’s refusal to condemn Hamas—a terrorist organization responsible for the October 7th massacre in Israel that left over 1,400 people dead—speaks volumes. Instead of recognizing the brutality of Hamas, Gannon lashed out at his own family for not acknowledging the so-called “genocide” in Palestine.

His social media profile is filled with incendiary posts, including one that endorses violence against Zionists, asserting that they “should feel unsafe everywhere.”

This rhetoric is not only hateful but dangerous. It’s the kind of ideology that encourages people to take violent action, as Gannon did when he attacked Hayes. When the left tolerates and promotes this kind of speech, they are directly contributing to a climate of hostility and violence.

The assault in Massachusetts is a stark reminder that the radical left’s version of “tolerance” is nothing more than a thinly veiled endorsement of hate against anyone who dares to oppose their narrative.

The rise of anti-Israel sentiment on the left has been alarming, and it’s become even more blatant in the wake of the October 7th Hamas attack. Instead of uniting in condemnation of terrorism, many on the radical left have doubled down on their support for Hamas and their hatred for Israel.

College campuses, which should be centers of intellectual debate and discourse, have become hotbeds for anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist protests, with pro-Israel students facing harassment and even threats of violence.

It’s not just about disagreeing on foreign policy. The rhetoric from the radical left is aimed at dehumanizing Israel and anyone who supports it. They paint Israel as a genocidal regime and Zionists as oppressors who deserve to feel unsafe. As one of Gannon’s reposts on social media suggested, “Zionists should feel unsafe everywhere.”

This is not the language of peaceful protest or constructive debate. This is the language of hate, and it’s fueling violence across the country. Just as concerning is the way mainstream institutions are turning a blind eye to it. The very people who claim to be against hate are standing idly by while a new form of hatred takes root in their ranks.

The left loves to claim moral superiority, constantly preaching about how they are the champions of tolerance, equality, and justice. But what they practice is selective outrage. They are quick to condemn hate when it fits their narrative, but they are equally quick to excuse or ignore it when it doesn’t.

Anti-Semitic and anti-Israel rhetoric has been on the rise within left-wing circles for years, yet we rarely see the same outcry from progressives that we do when other groups are targeted. Why? Because the radical left has decided that some hate is acceptable—so long as it’s aimed at the right people. If you’re pro-Israel or even just a supporter of Western democracy, you’re fair game for their vitriol.

This hypocrisy isn’t just a moral failing; it’s dangerous. By tolerating and even encouraging hate against those who disagree with them, the radical left is creating an environment where violence is not just possible—it’s inevitable. Caleb Gannon’s attack on Scott Hayes is proof of that.

When Gannon tackled Hayes for simply demonstrating in favor of Israel, he wasn’t just engaging in political protest—he was acting on a deep-seated hatred that has been fostered by years of radical left-wing rhetoric. The fact that Gannon refuses to condemn Hamas, an organization that openly targets civilians, further exposes the moral bankruptcy of his views.

What makes this situation even more disturbing is the legal response. Scott Hayes, who acted in self-defense after being violently attacked, is now facing charges of assault and battery with a deadly weapon. Meanwhile, Gannon, the aggressor, is being painted as the victim in some circles. This double standard is emblematic of the broader issue at play—justice is being warped to fit the radical left’s narrative.

The Anti-Defamation League of New England rightly pointed out how “concerning” it is that charges were immediately filed against Hayes before the investigation was even completed. This rush to judgment reflects the dangerous trend of prioritizing the feelings of radical protesters over the safety and rights of ordinary Americans who are simply trying to defend themselves.

The attack on Scott Hayes and the radical views of Caleb Gannon are part of a much larger issue. The left claims to stand against hate, but their actions tell a different story. They tolerate—and even promote—hatred against anyone who dares to disagree with their agenda, especially those who support Israel. This growing trend of anti-Israel rhetoric is not just divisive; it’s dangerous. It’s fueling violence and eroding the very foundations of our society.

The radical left’s hypocrisy must be called out for what it is: a dangerous and intolerant ideology that has no place in a civilized society. As Americans, we must stand up against this hate and ensure that our country remains a beacon of freedom, democracy, and respect for all—regardless of political or religious affiliation.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Kamala Harris has ben spreading her lies for years. But since becoming the Democrat nominee, she has doubled down.

But now, Kamala Harris’ most recent attempt to spread her lies was a complete disaster.

Vice President Kamala Harris is once again proving she’s unfit for any office, as her recent interview on 6abc Action News in Pennsylvania sent shockwaves through political circles and the internet.

It was Harris’s first solo interview since becoming the Democratic Party’s 2024 presidential nominee, but instead of showcasing her competence and vision, the interview exposed her profound lack of leadership, economic understanding, and ability to connect with everyday Americans.

Critics across the political spectrum were quick to denounce Harris’s performance, labeling it an “unmitigated disaster.” The Vice President, visibly nervous and stumbling over basic questions, left many wondering if she is remotely capable of running the country, let alone managing the economic challenges facing the nation.

What should have been an opportunity for Harris to inspire confidence in her leadership turned into a display of uncertainty, evasion, and incompetence.

One of the key topics addressed during the interview was how Harris’s policies would help lower prices and make life more affordable for struggling American families. This is, without a doubt, one of the most critical issues of our time, as inflation continues to rise, gas prices soar, and everyday essentials become increasingly unaffordable.

But rather than offering concrete solutions or a clear plan, Harris danced around the question with her signature style of vague rhetoric and nonsensical word salads. She avoided specifics and failed to explain how her policies would actually make a tangible difference in the lives of Americans.

Our newest ad just dropped pic.twitter.com/HGYvK5jNYX

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) September 13, 2024

For a politician who has spent years in Washington, Harris’s inability to articulate even basic economic policies was nothing short of alarming.

Fox News anchor David Asman nailed it when he said, “Kamala spends more than a minute skating completely around a specific question about how she’d bring down prices … and she gets away with it from another ABC ‘journalist’ who daren’t complain that she’s not within a mile of answering the question.”

The fact that Harris couldn’t provide a coherent answer to one of the most pressing issues facing the country only reinforces what so many Americans already know: She is simply out of her depth.

It didn’t take long for the internet to erupt in reaction to Harris’s bumbling performance. Critics from all walks of life weighed in, and the consensus was overwhelmingly clear—Kamala Harris is not ready for the presidency, and the American people know it.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis summed it up perfectly, saying, “She’s adding some vapid vinaigrette to her usual word salad.” Harris has become infamous for her nonsensical answers and circular talking points that offer no substance.

Instead of demonstrating depth or thoughtfulness, her interview showcased a politician who speaks in empty platitudes without any real understanding of the issues at hand.

This is nothing new for Harris, whose speeches and public appearances are often filled with empty, rehearsed lines. But now, as the Democratic Party’s nominee for president, her lack of substance is being exposed in ways that even the most biased media outlets can’t ignore. If Harris can’t handle a friendly local interview with soft questions, how can she possibly handle the complexities of running the country?

Another major question that Harris struggled to answer was how she is any different from President Joe Biden, a man whose approval ratings have been abysmal, especially on the economy. Biden’s presidency has been marred by failures on multiple fronts—rising inflation, an out-of-control border crisis, and declining global influence.

Harris, as Biden’s vice president, has been closely associated with these failures, and her inability to distance herself from his disastrous record raises serious doubts about her viability as a candidate.

When asked how she is different from Biden, Harris offered nothing but more hollow rhetoric. There was no attempt to separate herself from the administration’s failures or to chart a new path forward. Instead, she fumbled through her response, once again proving that she is simply an extension of Biden’s failed presidency.

Political commentator Sean Parnell delivered one of the most brutal assessments of Harris’s interview, comparing her to Michael Scott, the bumbling and incompetent character from the television show The Office. “She is the Michael Scott of presidential candidates but with no endearing qualities whatsoever,” Parnell quipped.

This comparison, while humorous, carries a serious implication. Like Michael Scott, Harris often appears clueless and ill-prepared, but unlike the fictional character, there is nothing charming or redeeming about her leadership style. Her performance in the interview was a stark reminder that she lacks the gravitas and capability needed to handle the presidency.

Billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman also chimed in, urging people to “watch the interview and vote accordingly.” Ackman’s statement reflects a growing sentiment among many Americans: Harris’s lack of leadership and depth is not just concerning—it’s dangerous.

What we saw in this interview was not just an isolated poor performance but a reflection of Harris’s larger problem—she is not prepared to lead. Harris’s track record as vice president is filled with missed opportunities, failures, and incompetence.

From her mismanagement of the border crisis to her lack of meaningful accomplishments in office, Harris has proven time and again that she is not up to the task.

Attorney Will Chamberlain captured the frustration many Americans feel when he pointed out that Harris knows what the questions are but simply doesn’t think the American people deserve an answer. This arrogance, combined with her incompetence, is a dangerous combination for someone seeking the highest office in the land.

As Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume pointed out, Harris was able to get through the 2020 vice-presidential debate without her “essential emptiness being exposed.” But now, as the Democratic Party’s nominee for president, her weaknesses are on full display for the world to see.

The reality is, Kamala Harris is simply not ready for the presidency. She has spent years in Washington, but instead of growing as a leader, she has proven herself to be nothing more than a politician of convenience, willing to say whatever is necessary to advance her career. Her disastrous interview should serve as a wake-up call for the Democratic Party and for the American people.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Harris and the Radical Left seem to have no care for our troops. But now she is facing severe repercussions.

Because Harris has been slammed for her recent anti-US troops rhetoric.

Once again, Vice President Kamala Harris has proven she is not fit to lead, especially when it comes to matters involving the brave men and women of our military.

During a recent presidential debate, Harris made an outrageous and demonstrably false claim that “as of today, there is not one member of the United States military who is in active duty in a combat zone in any war zone around the world.” This bold-faced lie not only disrespects the sacrifices of our service members but also highlights her deep disconnect with the realities on the ground.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), a U.S. Army combat veteran and a staunch advocate for our troops, swiftly and rightly condemned Harris’s deceitful rhetoric. Cotton didn’t hold back, stating that Harris’s claim “would come as a surprise to the thousands of troops we still have in places like Iraq and Syria that are getting repeatedly hit by mortars and drones.”

WATCH: Sen. Tom Cotton blasts Kamala Harris: "Kamala Harris's claims there are no American troops in a war zone, I bet, would come as a surprise to the thousands of troops we still have in places like Iraq and Syria. They're getting repeatedly hit by mortars and drones and other… pic.twitter.com/JMJbb8vHbF

— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) September 15, 2024

He went on to slam the Biden-Harris administration for emboldening the enemies of freedom and turning their backs on the service members who put their lives on the line every day to keep America safe.

Harris’s attempt to paint a rosy picture of global peace, falsely claiming no American troops are in combat zones, is a direct insult to the 3,000 U.S. soldiers currently stationed in Iraq and Syria, fighting against the remnants of ISIS and battling Iranian-backed terrorist groups.

These troops have faced over 200 attacks since Hamas’s attack on Israel on October 7, with mortars, drones, and missiles threatening their safety. Just last year, three U.S. soldiers lost their lives as a result of these hostile actions. Does Kamala Harris think their sacrifice doesn’t matter?

It seems that Harris’s focus is more on political maneuvering than on ensuring the safety and well-being of those who serve under her administration’s watch. Rather than acknowledging the challenges our troops face in combat zones, she has chosen to ignore their sacrifices in favor of crafting a false narrative to suit her political ambitions.

This should come as no surprise—after all, Harris and the Biden administration have spent four years appeasing regimes like Iran, emboldening those who seek to harm America and our allies.

Cotton rightly pointed out that the Biden-Harris administration has turned a blind eye to the very real threats facing American troops abroad. Iranian-backed terrorists continue to pose a significant danger to our soldiers in the Middle East, but instead of confronting these threats head-on, Harris and Biden have pursued a path of appeasement.

Shortly after taking office, they removed the Iranian-backed Houthis from the U.S. terrorist list—an action that emboldened the very rebels who now launch missile attacks at American sailors in the Red Sea.

This failed foreign policy approach is a stark contrast to the decisive leadership of President Donald Trump, who took a firm stance against Iran and its proxies. Trump designated the Houthis as terrorists, recognizing the threat they pose not only to regional stability but also to American forces and interests abroad. By reversing Trump’s strong policies, Harris and Biden have made the world more dangerous for our troops.

Harris’s lie during the debate is just another example of how she and the Biden administration refuse to take responsibility for their failures. In her eagerness to claim a non-existent victory, Harris ignored the ongoing risks faced by American service members deployed in dangerous regions.

As Sen. Cotton noted, Harris’s lie “would probably come as a surprise to all of the sailors we have in the Red Sea,” who face daily threats from missiles and drones fired by Iranian-backed groups like the Houthis.

The Biden-Harris administration’s inaction and lack of accountability have led to a deteriorating situation in the Middle East. Despite the clear and present danger to American troops, Harris would rather sweep it under the rug than confront the problem head-on.

Her claim during the debate was not only false but also dangerously misleading, sending a signal to our adversaries that this administration is more interested in political spin than in ensuring the safety and success of our military.

At the end of the day, Kamala Harris’s blatant disregard for the facts and her unwillingness to stand by our troops disqualify her from being Commander-in-Chief. Our troops deserve a leader who respects their sacrifices and understands the challenges they face. They need someone who is willing to stand up to America’s enemies and make the tough decisions necessary to keep them safe. Kamala Harris has shown time and again that she is not that leader.

Her dishonesty about the state of our military commitments is more than just a political misstep—it’s a reflection of her dangerous worldview. Harris’s leadership would continue to weaken America on the global stage, embolden our adversaries, and undermine the very men and women who defend our freedoms.

Sen. Cotton’s condemnation of Harris was not just warranted—it was necessary. Harris’s inability to grasp the seriousness of the ongoing threats to our troops should alarm every American. If she is willing to lie about something as important as the safety of our military personnel, what else is she willing to deceive the American people about?

The brave men and women of our armed forces deserve a leader who will fight for them—not lie about the dangers they face. Kamala Harris’s false claim that no American troops are in combat zones is a slap in the face to every service member currently deployed in harm’s way. Our troops continue to face real threats from Iranian-backed terrorists and other hostile forces, yet Harris remains oblivious, pushing a false narrative to further her political career.

America needs a leader who will stand with our troops, not one who dismisses their sacrifices. Kamala Harris has proven time and again that she is unfit to lead our military. Her false statements, weak foreign policy, and lack of accountability make her a danger to our national security.

We need leaders who respect the truth, honor the sacrifices of our troops, and are willing to take the necessary steps to keep America safe. Kamala Harris is not that leader, and her dishonesty should disqualify her from ever holding the position of Commander-in-Chief.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

In a horrifying development over the weekend, another person tried to take Trump’s life. And no one knew what happened.

But a new photo of Trump has emerged after the attempt and the American people are shocked.

In the face of yet another assassination attempt, Donald Trump has proven his resilience, strength, and unwavering commitment to the American people.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) proudly stood by Trump’s side, sharing a photo of himself and his wife Kelly alongside the former president, both smiling and giving a thumbs up. The image was posted to X (formerly Twitter) after a harrowing day when Trump survived what appears to have been an attempted assassination at his West Palm Beach golf club.

Kelly and I are departing Mar-a-Lago, where we just spent a few hours with President Trump and are thanking God for protecting him today—once again. No leader in American history has endured more attacks and remained so strong and resilient. He is unstoppable. pic.twitter.com/43Rm8SPGU8

— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) September 15, 2024

In his post, Johnson thanked God for protecting Trump, writing, “No leader in American history has endured more attacks and remained so strong and resilient. He is unstoppable.” Johnson’s words resonated deeply with Trump supporters across the country, who see the former president as a man constantly under siege but always standing tall, ready to fight for the future of America.

On Sunday afternoon, Trump’s campaign announced that the former president was “safe following gunshots in his vicinity” at Trump International Golf Club. According to authorities, the Secret Service opened fire on a man who was brandishing a rifle near Trump’s position on the golf course.

The suspect, identified later as a Democrat donor with a criminal history, reportedly poked the muzzle of the rifle through a fence surrounding the club. Fortunately, the quick response of the Secret Service averted what could have been a devastating tragedy.

The suspect fled the scene after exchanging fire with law enforcement, but thanks to witness reports and swift police action, he was apprehended shortly after. The FBI confirmed that it was investigating the incident as an “attempted assassination” of the former president.

Despite the gravity of the situation, Trump remained defiant, releasing a statement to his supporters: “Nothing will slow me down. I will NEVER SURRENDER! I will always love you for supporting me. Unity. Peace. Make America Great Again.”

These words reflect the strength and resolve that have become synonymous with Donald Trump, a man who refuses to bow to the forces seeking to bring him down.

Speaker Mike Johnson’s decision to stand alongside Trump in the aftermath of this latest attack is not just a symbolic gesture; it is a powerful statement of unity within the Republican Party and a testament to the deep respect many conservative leaders have for the former president.

Johnson, a staunch supporter of Trump and his America First policies, has often spoken about the unprecedented challenges Trump has faced both during his presidency and in the years since.

In his post, Johnson wrote, “We just spent a few hours with President Trump and are thanking God for protecting him today—once again.” Johnson’s sentiments reflect the deep concern many Americans have for Trump’s safety, especially given the increasing frequency of attacks aimed at the former president. From violent rhetoric to physical assaults, Trump has been targeted more than any other political leader in modern American history.

But as Johnson noted, Trump’s resilience is unmatched. “No leader in American history has endured more attacks and remained so strong and resilient,” Johnson declared. “He is unstoppable.” These words echo the sentiments of millions of Americans who view Trump as a fighter, a man willing to endure whatever it takes to continue his mission of making America great again.

This latest assassination attempt is not an isolated incident. It marks the second attempt on Trump’s life in just a few short months. In mid-July, Trump survived another violent attack while speaking at an outdoor rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

During that incident, a shooter opened fire on Trump from a rooftop, striking him in the right ear. Despite being hit, Trump raised his fist in defiance, a powerful gesture that embodied his unbreakable spirit.

Tragically, one rallygoer, 50-year-old fireman Corey Comperatore, lost his life during the attack, and two others were wounded. The gunman, identified as 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, was killed by Secret Service snipers.

While the gunman’s motivations remain unclear, the attack has raised serious questions about security at political events and the increasing willingness of radical individuals to use violence as a means of silencing political opponents.

In the aftermath of the Pennsylvania shooting, Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle resigned, facing significant backlash for the security failures that allowed the attack to take place. Multiple investigations, including one led by a bipartisan task force in the House, were launched to identify the causes of these failures and ensure that similar incidents never happen again.

House Speaker Mike Johnson and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) released a joint statement expressing confidence in the task force’s ability to “move quickly to find the facts, ensure accountability, and help make certain such failures never happen again.”

While both parties seem to agree on the need for better security measures, the fact remains that Donald Trump continues to face an alarming level of violence and hostility, unlike any other political figure in modern history.

One of the most disturbing aspects of these repeated assassination attempts is the relative silence from the mainstream media. When similar threats are made against Democratic leaders, the media is quick to condemn the violence and call for unity. However, when it comes to Donald Trump, there is often a deafening silence or, worse yet, a dismissal of the seriousness of these threats.

In this most recent incident, CNN’s Juliette Kayyem lamented not the attack on Trump’s life but the potential political advantage it might give him. Rather than focus on the gravity of an attempted assassination, Kayyem framed the situation as a “problem” because of how it could impact the upcoming election. This kind of rhetoric is not only irresponsible but also indicative of a troubling double standard that exists within the media.

Violence against any political figure should be condemned, regardless of their party affiliation. The fact that Donald Trump has been targeted multiple times and yet continues to receive only lukewarm concern from the media is a testament to the deep-seated bias that exists in the press.

Despite the attempts on his life, Donald Trump remains as defiant as ever. His message to his supporters—“Nothing will slow me down. I will NEVER SURRENDER!”—is a rallying cry for those who believe in his vision for America. Trump’s refusal to be cowed by violence, whether it be from radical individuals or from a biased media, has only strengthened his resolve to continue his fight for the American people.

In a time when political violence is on the rise and the divide between the Left and the Right seems wider than ever, Trump’s message of unity, peace, and strength is more important than ever. He stands as a symbol of resilience, not just for his supporters, but for the entire nation. As Speaker Mike Johnson so aptly put it, “He is unstoppable.”

Donald Trump’s ability to withstand repeated attacks—both physical and political—speaks to his unique place in American history. No other leader has faced such relentless opposition and yet remained so committed to his cause. The attempted assassination at his West Palm Beach golf club is a stark reminder of the dangers he continues to face. But as Trump has shown time and time again, he will not back down.

House Speaker Mike Johnson’s show of solidarity with Trump underscores the unity within the Republican Party and the determination to protect a leader who has done more for this country than any politician in recent memory. As the investigations continue and the facts come to light, one thing is clear: Donald Trump is a fighter, and he will not be stopped.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

CNN is not known for caring about people they disagree with. But even the most Radical Liberals were still shocked at this.

And CNN just said this horrifying thing about Trump live on air after the attempt on his life.

In a stunning and deeply troubling display of political spin, CNN’s Juliette Kayyem recently expressed concern that former President Donald Trump could benefit politically after a second assassination attempt.

Rather than focus on the alarming nature of the attack or condemn the violent individual responsible, Kayyem seemed more worried about the “problem” this posed for Democrats and the potential advantage it could give Trump in a heated election cycle.

The remarks have sparked outrage, raising questions about the media’s priorities when it comes to political violence and the lengths some are willing to go to downplay the severity of such attacks when the target is a conservative figure.

CNN's Juliette Kayyem laments this second Trump assassination attempt "could have impacted voters" and "will be used for political purposes" and that's "exceptionally unfortunate" pic.twitter.com/ymJKE3VbUZ

— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) September 16, 2024

The incident took place over the weekend at Trump International Golf Course in West Palm Beach, Florida, when authorities apprehended 58-year-old Ryan Routh. Routh, a Democrat donor with a criminal record, was found hiding in the shrubbery near the former president, armed with an AK-47-style rifle.

The close proximity to Trump and the apparent intentions of Routh sent shockwaves through the political landscape. According to reports, federal law enforcement noticed the weapon and quickly moved in, prompting Routh to flee in his car. A witness, thankfully alert, managed to capture a photo of the car and its license plate, leading to Routh’s swift arrest.

The seriousness of this situation cannot be overstated. An armed assailant, mere yards away from a former president of the United States, raises significant concerns about security, the political climate, and the safety of public figures.

But rather than reflect on the grave implications of such a violent act, CNN’s Kayyem turned her focus to something else entirely: the possibility that Trump might benefit politically from the ordeal.

Kayyem’s comments aired on CNN late Sunday night, and they immediately raised eyebrows. Instead of addressing the attempted assassination as a non-partisan issue of national importance, she framed the situation as a political inconvenience. “And I really don’t care what you feel about him, or Harris,” Kayyem said, seemingly dismissing the gravity of a violent attempt on Trump’s life. “I mean, this is, this is the expectation that he will be safe.”

While Kayyem acknowledged that Trump should be safe from harm—something that should go without saying in any civilized society—her remarks quickly turned to how this would affect the election.

“And the reason why this is, you know, in some ways, you know, you said how close the election is, the problem is this is a safety issue that is being thrown into a very intense political environment in which the very fact of an assassination, a constitutional moment, because it’s, it could have impacted voters, will be used for political purposes.”

This focus on how Trump might gain politically from the assassination attempt reflects a disturbing double standard. Can you imagine if the roles were reversed and a high-profile Democrat was the target of such violence?

The outrage from the mainstream media would be deafening, with endless commentary about the dangers of political extremism and violence. But when the victim is Donald Trump, the narrative suddenly shifts to how this might inconvenience the Democrats in the upcoming election.

Kayyem’s comments raise a significant concern about how political violence is perceived depending on who the target is. She even suggested that the situation could be used for “political purposes” by Trump supporters.

This implication—that conservatives might cynically use a violent attack to their advantage—is an appalling accusation. It not only downplays the seriousness of the threat but also paints Trump and his supporters as opportunists rather than victims of political violence.

What Kayyem seems to miss entirely is that no one should have to endure assassination attempts. Regardless of one’s political beliefs, a society that turns a blind eye to violence against public figures it disagrees with is a society on the brink of losing its moral compass. The fact that this is even being discussed as a “problem” for Democrats rather than a national crisis shows just how far the media has fallen in its partisan approach to the news.

The media’s tepid response to this assassination attempt stands in stark contrast to how other acts of political violence are treated. When Democrats are the targets of threats or attacks, there is an immediate and overwhelming call for unity, compassion, and justice.

And rightly so. Violence should never be used as a political weapon, and all Americans, regardless of political affiliation, should stand together to condemn it.

Yet, in this case, there has been a notable silence from many in the mainstream media. Where are the calls for justice? Where are the demands for accountability for the individuals who harbor such violent intentions toward a former president? Why is the focus not on ensuring that this never happens again but rather on the political fallout?

The truth is that there is a blatant double standard at play here. When violence targets conservatives, it is often downplayed or ignored altogether. This is not only dangerous but also erodes trust in the media and the democratic process.

Kayyem’s remarks also reflect a deeper problem in American society: the rising tide of political violence and the normalization of such threats. Over the last several years, we have seen an increase in political intimidation, attacks, and threats against public figures, especially on the conservative side of the aisle. From attempted attacks on Republican lawmakers to threats against Supreme Court justices, the Left has been alarmingly silent when the violence is directed at their political opponents.

Instead of focusing on the potential “political” ramifications of an assassination attempt, Kayyem and others should be using their platforms to call for calm, condemn violence in all forms, and ensure that political disagreements do not devolve into bloodshed.

The fact that CNN’s Juliette Kayyem chose to lament the political fallout rather than unequivocally condemn the assassination attempt speaks volumes about the current state of media bias. When political violence is used as a tool or dismissed depending on the target, it not only undermines the safety of public figures but also threatens the integrity of our political system.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story and more.

Democrat supporters are leaving the liberal party en masse. But now, this one defection might be the biggest one yet.

And a top Clinton advisor just betrayed the Harris campaign and accused her of something horrific.

In a striking condemnation of the media’s handling of the recent 2024 presidential debate, Mark Penn, a former top adviser to Bill and Hillary Clinton, voiced serious concerns over what he described as a “rigged” debate in favor of Democratic candidate Kamala Harris.

Speaking on the John Solomon Reports podcast, Penn pointed a finger directly at ABC News, accusing them of skewing the debate against former President Donald Trump and showing blatant favoritism toward Vice President Harris. This revelation adds fuel to an already raging fire surrounding media bias in the 2024 election and highlights the growing distrust many Americans have in establishment news outlets.

During the debate, moderated by ABC’s David Muir and Linsey Davis, it became glaringly apparent to many observers that Trump was held to a different standard than his opponent. Trump, known for his no-nonsense and unapologetic style, was constantly interrupted, pressed, and “fact-checked” on many of his accusations and policy statements.

In contrast, Harris was allowed to skate through the evening with little to no scrutiny of her own statements. This stark imbalance left many wondering whether the moderators were truly impartial or if they were actively working to shield the Democratic candidate from tough questioning.

Penn did not mince words, calling for an internal investigation at ABC News to determine whether the debate was rigged from the outset. “I actually think they should do a full internal investigation, hire an outside law firm. I don’t know how much of this was planned in advance,” Penn said.

His comments reflect a deepening suspicion among political commentators and voters that mainstream media is working in concert with Democratic campaigns to undermine Trump’s chances in the 2024 election.

Trump has long been a vocal critic of the media, often labeling them the “enemy of the people” for their overt bias and unrelenting hostility toward his presidency and candidacy. The 2024 debate only reaffirmed what Trump and his supporters have been saying for years—that the mainstream media is working hand in hand with the Democratic establishment to block his return to the White House.

ABC News’ moderators were notably more aggressive in pressing Trump for answers while allowing Harris to evade critical questions, feeding the perception of a stacked deck. Trump made this clear in his post-debate remarks, declaring that he would not participate in any further debates if the format remained as lopsided as it was.

Even CNN’s Jake Tapper, hardly a Trump supporter, acknowledged that Kamala Harris dodged many of the debate’s most critical questions, further proving that Trump’s complaints about the debate’s unfairness were not unfounded.

Despite the seemingly “three against one” nature of the event, Trump emerged as the winner in the eyes of many, including undecided voters. A post-debate poll from Reuters showed that Trump had a stronger showing than Harris, gaining significant support from independents and those still on the fence.

This result flies in the face of the media’s clear attempt to cast Harris as the victor, illustrating the enduring strength of Trump’s message and his connection with the American people.

Penn’s call for an independent investigation into ABC News’ handling of the debate is not just about this one event. It speaks to a larger problem of media bias that has plagued American politics for years. As Penn explained, the suspicion surrounding the debate is “quite high,” and a thorough review of internal communications at ABC—texts, emails, and instructions given to moderators—should be conducted by an independent third party.

“What the situation demands is transparency and accountability,” Penn stated. “If the referees have their finger on the scale, it’s harder to break through and overcome.”

In a political environment where every decision matters, especially in the lead-up to an election as pivotal as 2024, media bias has the potential to dramatically alter the course of American democracy. When news organizations abandon their responsibility to remain neutral and instead become advocates for one side, the American people lose faith in the democratic process.

This erosion of trust in the media was a major theme during Trump’s first term, and it continues to be an issue in his second campaign. Trump’s supporters are no strangers to seeing their candidate unfairly maligned and attacked by the press, yet they remain resolute in their belief that Trump is the one leader capable of taking on the establishment and restoring fairness to the system.

Kamala Harris, currently Vice President under Joe Biden, has benefited immensely from a mainstream media that has treated her with kid gloves throughout her political career. Despite her lack of accomplishments and dubious record as California’s attorney general, Harris has been propped up as the future of the Democratic Party, with glowing profiles and puff pieces that would make any politician jealous.

As Penn pointed out, Harris has succeeded in convincing some Americans that she represents “change,” even though she’s been an integral part of an administration that has overseen unprecedented inflation, rising crime, and chaos at the southern border. The media has largely ignored her failures and missteps, choosing instead to focus on her identity and her role as a “historic” candidate.

But as Trump and his campaign have made clear, Harris is not the leader the country needs—and her policies, if ever fully enacted, would spell disaster for America’s working families.

Penn also highlighted one of Harris’s most radical positions: her support for taxpayer-funded s*x change operations for prisoners and her call to defund ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement).

These positions, documented in her response to an ACLU survey, expose just how out-of-touch Harris is with mainstream American values. As Penn advised, Trump’s campaign would do well to distribute this survey to every voter, showing just how extreme Harris’s positions truly are.

As the 2024 election draws nearer, the stakes couldn’t be higher. With a biased media openly working to undermine Trump and prop up Kamala Harris, the battle ahead will be fierce. But if there’s one thing Trump has proven, it’s that he’s a fighter. Despite the media’s best efforts to paint him as a villain, Trump remains the candidate of the people, and his message of economic prosperity, national security, and putting America first resonates across the country.

Mark Penn’s call for an investigation into ABC News should not be ignored. The American people deserve to know if their media is manipulating events to influence the outcome of an election. The media’s role is to report the news fairly, not to be a cheerleader for one candidate while tearing down another. As Penn said, “General media coverage has been fairly laughable,” but the consequences of that bias are no laughing matter.

The 2024 election will be a referendum not just on Biden and Harris’s failed policies, but on the integrity of the media and the entire political system. Trump’s supporters understand what’s at stake, and they’re prepared to stand with him, no matter how hard the establishment tries to stop him. The media may have their finger on the scale, but with Trump leading the charge, the American people have the power to restore balance and fairness to the country.

The media’s bias in the Trump-Harris debate is just the latest chapter in a long history of the establishment trying to block Trump’s path to the White House. But as Mark Penn rightly pointed out, this cannot go unanswered. The American people deserve transparency, and ABC News must be held accountable for its actions. Trump’s ability to fight through this bias and emerge stronger speaks volumes about his resilience and his deep connection with the American people.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

Trump’s campaign is heating up while Harris’ is losing steam. And Trump might have just put the final nail in the coffin.

Because he made a bold promise in a swing state that could change the whole election.

During a recent campaign speech in Tucson, Arizona, Donald Trump laid out a transformative economic plan that could reshape the American workforce. And in a bold new campaign promise, he vowed to eliminate taxes on overtime pay if he wins the presidency in November, a pledge that has the potential to boost the take-home pay of millions of hardworking Americans.

With this initiative, Trump continues to position himself as the champion of the working class, standing in stark contrast to the Biden-Harris administration, which has burdened the country with excessive taxation and inflationary policies.

Speaking before an energized crowd, Trump made it clear that Washington has long ignored those who contribute extra hours to the economy—the men and women who work tirelessly through overtime.

“The people who work overtime are among the hardest working citizens in our country, and for too long, no one in Washington has been looking out for them,” Trump declared to thunderous applause. “As part of our additional tax cuts, we will end taxes on overtime.”

Trump: "I'm also announcing that as part of our additional tax cuts we will end all taxes on overtime." pic.twitter.com/Na0R6ZAerM

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) September 12, 2024

This policy proposal directly addresses a major concern for millions of Americans who rely on overtime to make ends meet, especially during times of economic hardship. Under the Biden administration, these workers have faced punitive taxes on their additional earnings, reducing the incentives to take on extra hours.

Trump’s plan would change that, allowing workers to keep more of what they earn, which would not only benefit families but could also stimulate economic growth by putting more money back into the pockets of consumers.

Trump’s economic policies have always centered around the belief that prosperity comes from empowering individuals rather than taxing them into submission. His tax cuts during his first term revitalized the economy, lowered unemployment, and increased wages across the board.

By eliminating taxes on overtime pay, Trump is reaffirming his commitment to a pro-worker agenda, one that values productivity and rewards hard work, rather than stifling it with burdensome taxes.

According to Trump, the proposed overtime tax cut has garnered strong approval from economists, many of whom believe it could help create an entirely new workforce. “That gives more people an incentive to work,” Trump stated confidently during his speech, outlining how the removal of taxes on overtime would encourage more Americans to seek additional employment or stay longer in their current roles.

In the midst of rising inflation, sluggish job growth, and economic uncertainty under Biden, this plan could offer a significant boost to both workers and businesses. Employers would likely see an increase in productivity, while workers would have more motivation to take on extra shifts or stay late, knowing that their efforts won’t be punished by Uncle Sam.

This policy aligns with Trump’s long-standing focus on reducing government interference in the lives of everyday Americans. As he continues to draw sharp contrasts between his economic vision and that of the current administration, it is clear that Trump’s plan would provide much-needed relief for working families who have been suffocated by Biden’s high-tax agenda.

Trump’s choice to announce this major policy in Arizona was no coincidence. Arizona has been a crucial battleground state, and Trump is keen to reclaim it after Biden’s narrow victory in 2020. Historically, Arizona has leaned Republican in almost every presidential election since World War II.

However, demographic changes in recent years, fueled by an influx of transplants from blue states and shifting suburban voting patterns, have complicated the GOP’s dominance.

Still, Republicans outnumber Democrats in the state, and a third of voters are registered as independents, making Arizona a critical battleground for both parties. Trump’s decision to focus on policies that directly benefit the working class is a smart play to win over these independent voters, many of whom are disillusioned with the economic mismanagement of the current administration.

His running mate, Ohio Senator JD Vance, recently visited Phoenix, joining Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, at a major event in a predominantly Republican area. The GOP’s ability to energize voters in key states like Arizona will be pivotal in determining the outcome of the election.

In addition to his promise to eliminate taxes on overtime pay, Trump has also vowed to eliminate taxes on tips. This policy is aimed at service industry workers who often rely on tips to make a living but see their hard-earned income siphoned away by federal and state tax collectors. By ending this practice, Trump is sending a clear message: He stands with those who work hard for every dollar they earn.

The Harris campaign, clearly feeling the pressure, was quick to copy Trump’s promise to eliminate tip taxes, but the reality is that Harris’s record on tax policy speaks volumes. As vice president, she has supported and enabled an administration that has done nothing but raise taxes and increase regulations on businesses and individuals alike. The Harris-Walz team may talk a good game now, but their credibility on tax relief is paper-thin.

The contrast between Trump’s tax policies and the disastrous economic stewardship of the Biden-Harris administration could not be starker. Since taking office, the Biden administration has overseen record inflation, skyrocketing gas prices, and economic stagnation that has hurt working families across the country.

The administration’s obsession with climate change regulations, along with its failure to address rising energy costs, has made life harder for average Americans, all while pushing for tax increases that have crippled small businesses.

Under Biden’s leadership, the economy has been in freefall, and working-class Americans have borne the brunt of this mismanagement. By targeting overtime and tips, Biden’s tax policies have hit the very people who can least afford it. And let’s not forget the disastrous spending bills, laden with pork and progressive pet projects, which have only worsened the national debt.

The Harris-Walz ticket has done little to distance itself from these catastrophic policies. Despite their sudden claims of support for tax cuts on tips, their economic plans remain deeply rooted in the same big-government, high-tax philosophy that has crippled the American economy for the past several years.

Donald Trump’s promise to end taxes on overtime and tips is part of a larger vision for restoring economic prosperity to the country. His first term was marked by record economic growth, low unemployment, and tax cuts that benefited businesses and workers alike. Trump’s policies provided the foundation for a booming economy, only to be undone by the reckless spending and mismanagement of the Biden administration.

Trump understands that hard work should be rewarded, not penalized, and his new tax plans reflect that belief. He continues to champion policies that benefit everyday Americans, especially those in blue-collar industries and service jobs.

With this new initiative, Trump is positioning himself as the leader who will rebuild the American economy from the damage inflicted by the current administration.

Donald Trump’s latest policy proposal to eliminate taxes on overtime pay is a game-changer for the American worker. It underscores his commitment to empowering everyday citizens and putting more money into the pockets of those who earn it.

As the 2024 election draws nearer, the contrast between Trump’s pro-worker, pro-growth agenda and the failed economic policies of the Biden-Harris administration will be a central issue for voters.

Arizona, a key battleground state, could play a crucial role in deciding the future of the nation. Trump’s focus on economic policies that benefit working families, alongside his steadfast commitment to lower taxes and less government interference, positions him as the candidate who will restore America’s economic might.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Radical Left hates Trump and wants to see him locked up. That’s why they are prosecuting him with everything they can.

But now, Trump has received a massive court win that has shaken the Democrat party.

In yet another blow to the left’s ongoing crusade against former President Donald Trump, a Fulton County judge in Georgia dismissed two criminal charges against Trump on Thursday, ruling that state prosecutors overstepped their legal authority.

This ruling, handed down by Judge Scott McAfee, is a significant victory for Trump, as it marks the defeat of five of the original 13 charges brought against him in the highly controversial indictment filed by District Attorney Fani Willis in August 2023.

Judge McAfee’s decision struck down two key charges—Count 15, Conspiracy to commit filing false documents, and Count 27, Filing false documents—both of which were leveled against Trump in a case that has been plagued with overreach, political motivations, and legal loopholes from the start.

In his ruling, Judge McAfee emphasized that state prosecutors lacked the authority to file the charges against Trump. He cited a U.S. Supreme Court decision that “preempts the State’s ability to prosecute perjury and false filings in a federal district court.”

This constitutional principle protects individuals from state overreach in cases where federal jurisdiction takes precedence, and the dismissal of these counts serves as a reminder that state prosecutors, particularly politically motivated ones like Fani Willis, cannot simply run roughshod over the law.

BREAKING: Judge Scott McAfee strikes three counts from the Fulton election interference case, citing the Supremacy clause to the Constitution. The counts relate to alleged false statements made in federal court pic.twitter.com/7PRRdaEdys

— Tamar Hallerman (@TamarHallerman) September 12, 2024

Judge McAfee ruled that “Counts 14, 15, and 27 must be quashed.” While Trump was not personally charged with Count 14, Criminal attempt to commit filing false documents, the dismissal of Counts 15 and 27 represents a major win for the former president.

These counts were central to the narrative Willis attempted to craft, one that painted Trump as engaging in a so-called conspiracy to file false documents—a charge that has now been thoroughly debunked in court.

This ruling means that Trump has now successfully defeated five of the original 13 charges, including three earlier counts that were dismissed: Count 5, Solicitation of violation of oath by public officer; Count 28, Solicitation of violation of oath by public officer; and Count 38, Solicitation of violation of oath by public officer. In short, the case against Trump is falling apart.

From the beginning, it was clear that Fani Willis’s indictment of Trump was not about justice—it was about politics. The timing of the charges, the nature of the accusations, and the fact that they have now been dismissed one by one all point to the same conclusion: this was a coordinated effort to target Trump in the hopes of derailing his political future.

Willis, a known Democrat, filed the charges against Trump in August 2023, just as the former president was gearing up for another potential run for office. The charges were clearly intended to weaken Trump’s standing in the eyes of the American public, but this recent ruling by Judge McAfee proves that the legal case against Trump was built on shaky ground from the start.

The indictment itself, which included charges of racketeering under Georgia’s RICO Act, as well as various counts of conspiracy and false statements, was overly ambitious and reflected Willis’s willingness to stretch the law in order to ensnare Trump. The fact that five of these charges have already been quashed raises serious questions about the legitimacy of the entire case.

Steve Sadow, Trump’s lead attorney in Georgia, underscored the importance of this victory, stating, “President Trump and his legal team in Georgia have prevailed once again. The trial court has decided that counts 15 and 27 in the indictment must be quashed/dismissed.”

This is just the latest example of Trump’s legal team successfully defending against the relentless and often frivolous legal attacks that have been launched against him since he left office.

Of course, the mainstream media has been complicit in this witch hunt from the beginning. Rather than report on the legal facts, media outlets like CNN, MSNBC, and The Washington Post have gleefully spread misinformation about Trump’s legal battles, portraying him as guilty before the facts were even established.

This recent victory in Georgia, however, is unlikely to get the same breathless coverage from these outlets as the initial indictment did. The media’s obsession with tearing Trump down at every turn has been evident for years. They have played a key role in amplifying every baseless accusation and overblown narrative crafted by Trump’s political enemies.

Despite their best efforts, Trump continues to fight back. The dismissal of these charges in Georgia is not just a victory for Trump, but a victory for the rule of law and a reminder that political prosecutions should never be tolerated in America.

The establishment media and the radical left may want to see Trump fail, but time and again, the courts are proving that their baseless legal attacks are crumbling under scrutiny.

Though Trump has now defeated five of the original charges, several charges still remain. These include:

Count 1: Violation of the Georgia RICO Act
Count 9: Conspiracy to commit impersonating a public officer
Count 11: Conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree
Count 13: Conspiracy to commit false statements and writings
Count 17: Conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree
Count 19: Conspiracy to commit false statements and writings
Count 29: False statements and writings
Count 39: False statements and writings

While the remaining charges are still pending, the collapse of five counts demonstrates that Willis’s indictment is deeply flawed. The remaining charges are similarly built on shaky legal grounds, and Trump’s legal team is confident that they, too, will be defeated.

The Georgia RICO charge, for instance, is the centerpiece of Willis’s indictment, but it is an incredibly broad and aggressive charge that is often used to prosecute organized crime—not political disputes. Applying such a charge in this case is a massive overreach that demonstrates the extent to which Willis is willing to stretch the law in order to target Trump.

While Trump’s legal battles may dominate the headlines, the bigger picture is that these politically motivated prosecutions are part of a broader effort to stop him from running for office again. The radical left and their allies in the media know that Trump remains incredibly popular with everyday Americans, and they will stop at nothing to try to prevent him from returning to the White House.

But Trump’s victories in court show that the American legal system still has safeguards against political overreach. As these baseless charges fall apart one by one, it becomes clearer that Trump has been the target of a coordinated smear campaign designed to take him down, not based on facts or the law, but on political ideology.

The establishment fears Trump because he represents the will of the people. He is not beholden to the swamp, and that makes him a threat to the entrenched interests in Washington, D.C. That is why they are trying so hard to block him, but their efforts are failing.

Thursday’s ruling is a major victory for Donald Trump and a devastating blow to the politically motivated prosecution being spearheaded by Fani Willis. The dismissal of two more charges proves that the case against Trump is unraveling, and his legal team is continuing to expose the overreach and hypocrisy of the left.

As the legal battles rage on, one thing is clear: Trump remains resilient, and the American people are watching closely as the truth continues to come to light.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Kamala Harris lies all the time when addressing America. But this time, she has taken it too far.

And Harris was caught in a shocking lie that has left even her supporters stunned.

During Tuesday night’s debate, Vice President Kamala Harris blatantly lied about her position on gun confiscation, yet the establishment media — with ABC News moderator David Muir at the helm — allowed her to get away with it.

Harris claimed she has no intention of taking away Americans’ firearms, but her record shows otherwise. The fact that she was not challenged on this deceitful claim exposes the media’s clear bias against Donald Trump and their determination to protect Harris at all costs.

When pressed by former President Donald Trump, who correctly pointed out her past support for gun confiscation through mandatory buyback programs, Harris tried to cover her tracks. She responded, “Tim Walz and I are both gun owners. We’re not taking anybody’s guns away.” But this is the same Kamala Harris who, during her 2019 presidential campaign, openly supported the idea of mandatory gun buybacks. Back then, she stated, “I would support a mandatory buyback of assault weapons. This is what the American people want.”

In 2020, ABC's David Muir & Joe Biden called Kamala Harris out for wanting to issue an Executive Order to take away people's guns.

Last night, Muir sat there and let Kamala lie and say that she wasn't going to take anyone's guns away. pic.twitter.com/aDt2ZN3spu

— Media Research Center (@theMRC) September 11, 2024

Harris’s sudden change in rhetoric during the debate — claiming to be a staunch defender of gun rights because she owns a firearm — is a transparent political ploy. Harris’s ownership of a gun is not the issue; her support for taking guns away from law-abiding Americans is. She can’t claim to protect Second Amendment rights while advocating for policies that directly infringe upon them.

Trump, as always, cut to the heart of the matter when he responded, “She is destroying our country. She has a plan to defund the police. She has a plan to confiscate everybody’s guns. She has a plan to not allow fracking in Pennsylvania or anywhere else.” He accurately exposed Harris’s true agenda — an agenda that the establishment media refuses to report on truthfully.

The media’s treatment of Kamala Harris during the debate is just another example of how the mainstream press is actively working to shield her and other Democrats from scrutiny. When Harris claimed Trump was “lying” about her gun confiscation position, moderator David Muir didn’t bother to fact-check her or challenge her statement. This blatant media bias isn’t a one-off occurrence — it’s a pattern that has persisted throughout Trump’s political career.

From the moment Donald Trump entered the political arena, the media has been obsessed with smearing his name, downplaying his accomplishments, and amplifying every misstep of his administration.

In contrast, they have bent over backward to protect Kamala Harris, despite her clear policy failures and inconsistencies. Harris’s dishonesty about her stance on gun confiscation is a prime example of how the media covers for her.

Had Trump or any other conservative made such a blatant lie on the debate stage, the media would be up in arms, running 24/7 coverage on how this is “yet another example” of the supposed dishonesty of Republicans. But when Harris lies — particularly about an issue as important as gun rights — the media remains silent.

Harris’s attempt to claim that she doesn’t support gun confiscation contradicts her previous statements on the matter. During the 2019 Democratic primary debates, Harris was pressed on her support for a mandatory gun buyback program, a policy that would effectively amount to gun confiscation.

Former Vice President Joe Biden even pushed back against her at the time, pointing out that such a program would be unconstitutional. Harris’s response? “Yes, we can,” she said, brushing off Biden’s concerns with her characteristic flippant attitude.

Let’s be clear: a mandatory buyback program is not voluntary. It’s government-sanctioned confiscation, plain and simple. The idea that the federal government can force American citizens to give up their lawfully owned firearms should be alarming to anyone who values the Second Amendment. Harris’s attempts to dance around her past statements show her willingness to say anything to gain political favor, even if it means lying to the American people.

This isn’t just a political issue — it’s a fundamental constitutional issue. The right to bear arms is enshrined in the Second Amendment of the Constitution, and any attempt to undermine that right should be taken seriously. Yet Harris and her allies in the media continue to downplay the significance of her past support for gun confiscation.

Unlike Kamala Harris, Donald Trump has been a staunch defender of Americans’ Second Amendment rights throughout his presidency. Under Trump’s leadership, we saw an administration committed to protecting law-abiding gun owners from overreaching government mandates.

Trump understands what Harris and the Democrats fail to grasp — that gun ownership is not just a right, but a fundamental safeguard of personal freedom.

Trump’s criticism of Harris during the debate was spot on. He rightly pointed out her plans to defund the police, her desire to strip Americans of their Second Amendment rights, and her hostility toward energy independence, including fracking. Harris represents the worst of Democratic overreach, and her policies would only lead to further erosion of American freedoms.

The difference between Trump and Harris could not be more stark. While Trump fights for the rights of everyday Americans, Harris is more concerned with pandering to the far-left wing of her party. She may own a gun herself, but she has no problem supporting policies that would make it harder for law-abiding citizens to exercise their constitutional rights. The establishment media, predictably, refuses to call her out on this hypocrisy.

The media’s failure to hold Harris accountable for her statements is part of a broader effort to discredit Trump at every turn. The establishment media despises Trump because he refuses to play by their rules. They cannot control him, and that terrifies them. From day one, they have done everything in their power to undermine his presidency, twist his words, and downplay his achievements. Meanwhile, they prop up flawed candidates like Harris, turning a blind eye to their policy failures and inconsistencies.

But the American people see through the media’s bias. They know that Trump represents a movement that values freedom, personal responsibility, and limited government. They also know that Harris and the Democrats are pushing a radical agenda that seeks to dismantle those very principles.

The establishment media’s constant attacks on Trump are not just about him — they’re about what he represents. Trump is a threat to the status quo, and the media will stop at nothing to hinder him. Harris, on the other hand, is a product of that status quo, and the media will do everything they can to protect her, even if it means ignoring her lies and pretending her policies aren’t a threat to the American way of life.

Kamala Harris’s lie about her position on gun confiscation during the debate is just the latest example of her dishonesty and the media’s complicity in covering for her. The establishment media hates Trump because he stands up to them, and they will do everything in their power to block him from returning to the White House.

But despite their efforts, Trump continues to resonate with the American people because he fights for their freedoms, including their Second Amendment rights.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Democrats across the nation continue to make the lives of their constituents worse. But now, people are pushing back.

And a Democrat representative has been betrayed by his own supporters because of horrific liberal policies.

Rep. Jonathan Jackson (D-IL), son of civil rights icon Jesse Jackson, recently found himself at the center of a heated town hall meeting, where black residents from his district delivered a stark message: enough is enough. The frustration and anger from the community came to a boiling point as constituents blasted Jackson for his support of the tens of thousands of illegal migrants flooding into Chicago.

The once-reliable Democratic voters are now questioning the direction of their leadership as their neighborhoods are overrun with migrants and resources meant for American citizens are siphoned off to care for those who entered the country illegally.

The town hall was intended to be a routine meeting, but the issue of illegal immigration dominated the conversation, with one resident’s fiery response encapsulating the discontent that many in the room clearly shared. When Jackson asked the audience member what solution he would propose, the man didn’t hesitate: “Send them back, that’s the only solution,” he said, prompting thunderous applause from the crowd.

The straightforward answer resonated deeply with attendees who are tired of seeing their neighborhoods overwhelmed and underfunded while taxpayer dollars are used to accommodate illegal immigrants.

The conversation didn’t end there. The resident passionately continued his remarks, stating, “They will overtake us in numbers at the rate that they have kids. They cannot be U.S. citizens. You are dooming our next generation to sub-servitude.” This hard-hitting statement struck a chord with the crowd, who understood the basic math of the situation.

More illegal migrants mean more strain on public services, more overcrowded schools, and a larger voting bloc in future generations that will further push African Americans to the margins of political influence.

For decades, black Americans have been the backbone of the Democratic Party, but now, they feel as if they are being displaced in their own communities by new groups who are given preferential treatment. It’s not just about sheer numbers—it’s about what those numbers mean for the future.

As the resident pointed out, “All we have to do now is look at the Hispanic voting bloc they have now. They get everything they want. Look at our communities. You should see the schools that they have as compared to the schools we have.”

The reality is that black neighborhoods in Chicago have seen a significant deterioration in the quality of life, with poorly funded schools, limited job opportunities, and high crime rates. Meanwhile, migrants are placed in shelters, receive government assistance, and are poised to take advantage of services that should be reserved for American citizens.

This blatant favoritism has left black Americans feeling abandoned by the very party they have supported for generations.

In an attempt to defuse the situation, Rep. Jackson claimed that many of the migrants arriving in Chicago don’t qualify for asylum and won’t become U.S. citizens. But the resident wasn’t buying it, responding, “I’m not concerned about that, I’m concerned about the children that they have. They will be U.S. citizens and they will have a voting bloc.”

The crowd’s reaction made it clear that this was the crux of the issue—the future political implications of an ever-growing migrant population. The people of Chicago are not just worried about the present but about what lies ahead for their children and grandchildren.

Jackson’s dismissal of these concerns only added fuel to the fire. For many in the black community, it feels as though their elected representatives are prioritizing illegal migrants over the very people they were elected to serve. Jackson’s response was a classic example of the Democratic establishment’s tone-deaf approach to illegal immigration: ignore the concerns of working-class Americans while pushing policies that favor those who break the law to enter the country.

One of the most egregious aspects of the current situation in Chicago is that the overwhelming majority of taxpayer-funded migrant shelters have been placed in black neighborhoods. These communities, already struggling with crime, poverty, and underfunded schools, are now expected to shoulder the additional burden of providing for tens of thousands of illegal immigrants.

The irony is not lost on these residents. After years of promises from Democratic leaders about improving their quality of life, they are now watching those same resources be redirected to migrants who haven’t contributed to the city.

As one resident succinctly put it, “Look at our communities. You should see the schools that they have as compared to the schools we have.” Black Americans in Chicago are no longer willing to sit by quietly as their neighborhoods are overrun and neglected. They are starting to organize, with grassroots black organizations now pledging to “vote red” in an effort to throw black Democrats out of office.

This is a significant shift in the political landscape, as black voters have historically been a loyal voting bloc for the Democratic Party. But with illegal immigration threatening their communities and livelihoods, many are beginning to see that the party no longer represents their best interests.

As black communities in Chicago and other cities across the country feel the brunt of illegal immigration, many are turning their attention to the one leader who made securing the border a top priority: Donald Trump. Under President Trump’s leadership, the border was more secure, illegal immigration was declining, and the focus was on putting American citizens first.

Trump’s “America First” agenda resonates with black Americans who feel left behind by a Democratic Party more concerned with pandering to migrants than addressing the needs of its own citizens.

Trump’s strong stance on border security, his efforts to reduce illegal immigration, and his focus on job creation for all Americans—including black Americans—are in stark contrast to the open-borders policies of the Biden-Harris administration.

Under Biden and Harris, the southern border is wide open, allowing millions of migrants to flood into the country with little to no oversight. The result has been chaos in cities like Chicago, where black residents are now realizing that their votes for Democratic leaders have come at a steep price.

The Biden-Harris administration’s handling of illegal immigration has been nothing short of a disaster. Their refusal to enforce border security, coupled with their encouragement of migrants to enter the country illegally, has led to a tidal wave of migrants overwhelming cities across America.

And while they may claim to care about working-class Americans, their actions speak louder than words. Black Americans, in particular, are feeling the effects of these policies as their neighborhoods become ground zero for migrant shelters and taxpayer-funded programs designed to support illegal immigrants.

The backlash against Biden and Harris is growing, and it’s not just coming from Republicans. Black Americans, once a reliable voting bloc for the Democratic Party, are beginning to question whether their loyalty has been misplaced. They see their communities being neglected while illegal immigrants are given preferential treatment, and they are starting to organize in opposition to their own elected officials.

As grassroots black organizations in Chicago pledge to “vote red” in the next election, it’s clear that the tide is turning. The Democratic Party can no longer take the black vote for granted, especially when their policies are actively harming the very communities they claim to represent.

The frustration and anger expressed at Rep. Jonathan Jackson’s town hall meeting are indicative of a larger movement brewing across America. Black Americans are tired of being taken for granted by a party that prioritizes illegal immigrants over its own citizens. They are tired of watching their neighborhoods deteriorate while resources are funneled to support those who broke the law to enter the country.

The solution, as that passionate resident said, is simple: “Send them back.” It’s time for the Biden-Harris administration to stop ignoring the concerns of everyday Americans and start putting the needs of its citizens first. Illegal immigration is not just a border issue—it’s an American issue. And it’s one that the people of Chicago, and the rest of the country, are no longer willing to ignore.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

The mainstream media is doing everything they can to cover up the truth. But the situation is extreme.

And a shocking story out of Ohio has revealed a troubling truth about the immigration crisis.

The shocking story of an Ohio family forced to pull their child out of preschool because he was the only English-speaking student in the class has sent ripples through communities across the country. What should have been a simple meet-and-greet turned into a nightmare when a mother learned that her son, enrolled in a state preschool in Tuscarawas County, Ohio, would be the only child in the class who spoke English.

Even worse, the school told her she would have to hire a translator at her own expense if her son was to attend. This is the sad reality of a nation overwhelmed by mass illegal immigration under the Biden-Harris administration.

In a video that quickly went viral, the boy’s grandfather expressed his frustration: “My daughter enrolled my four-year-old grandson into preschool last week and they have a little meet-and-greet… They tell her she has to hire a translator with her own money in order to send him to preschool because he is the only student that doesn’t speak Spanish.”

The incredulity and disbelief in his voice reflect the deep sense of betrayal felt by many Americans as they watch their communities buckle under the strain of an unchecked influx of illegal immigrants.

This story is far from an isolated incident. In cities across Ohio and the nation, small towns are being transformed overnight by the flood of illegal immigrants—people who are arriving without any preparation or plan to integrate into local society.

These immigrants bring with them different languages, customs, and in many cases, no understanding of English. The results are devastating for American families who are now faced with the challenge of adapting to a new reality that they neither asked for nor voted for.

And who’s to blame for this chaos? The Biden-Harris administration. Since day one, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have embraced policies that not only encourage illegal immigration but actively facilitate it.

Their refusal to secure the southern border has unleashed waves of migrants into towns like New Philadelphia, Ohio, where American children are being sidelined and pushed out of the very schools their families fund through taxes.

The story of the Ohio man’s grandson is the perfect illustration of how mass immigration is not just a border issue—it’s a national one. The media and Democratic leadership try to frame illegal immigration as a problem that only affects southern states, but as this family in small-town Ohio discovered, the reality is much different.

No longer is this a red-state or blue-state issue. The floodgates have been opened, and communities in every corner of the country are being forced to deal with the consequences.

The situation in Springfield, Ohio, further underscores the devastating effects of mass immigration. In just a few short years, Springfield has been overwhelmed by an estimated 20,000 Haitian immigrants.

This small Ohio community, unprepared for such an influx, is now grappling with the fallout of the Biden-Harris administration’s reckless policies. Residents have reported shocking incidents, including Haitians beheading ducks in public parks—a scene that would have been unimaginable in the once peaceful city. Yet, the mainstream media has largely turned a blind eye to these realities.

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine has stepped up to do what the Biden-Harris administration refuses to—send support to communities like Springfield. DeWine recently announced the deployment of the Ohio State Highway Patrol to help local law enforcement manage the growing crisis, particularly as the community faces a surge in traffic accidents caused by drivers unfamiliar with American road laws.

However, even with DeWine’s $2.5 million emergency fund to assist these communities, there’s only so much that can be done at the state level when the federal government is so derelict in its duties.

Illegal immigration isn’t just about numbers; it’s about culture, language, and the fabric of American society. The Biden-Harris administration, by refusing to enforce immigration laws and encouraging unchecked migration, has initiated nothing short of an invasion.

Communities like Springfield, New Philadelphia, and countless others across the country are being overwhelmed by the sheer number of immigrants who are arriving without any plan or means to support themselves.

The radical left and open-borders advocates may claim that America is a melting pot, but this isn’t what a melting pot looks like. This is chaos. When American children like that boy in New Philadelphia can’t attend preschool without their parents footing the bill for a translator because the class is filled with non-English-speaking students, we are witnessing the unraveling of our shared national identity. And it’s all being done under the guise of compassion.

Let’s not forget that this isn’t compassion—it’s exploitation. The Biden-Harris administration has actively encouraged people from impoverished and dangerous countries to flood across our borders with promises of free healthcare, education, and housing. The end result? American citizens are left paying the price.

Contrast this catastrophe with the Trump administration’s approach to immigration. Under President Trump, illegal immigration was declining, border security was a top priority, and communities across the country were safer as a result. Trump understood that a nation without borders is not a nation at all. He built the border wall, enforced immigration laws, and made it clear that illegal immigrants would not be rewarded for breaking the law.

Trump’s “America First” policies were not anti-immigrant—they were pro-law, pro-sovereignty, and pro-America. He worked to create a system that allowed legal immigrants to thrive while protecting the rights and safety of American citizens. Biden and Harris, on the other hand, have torn down those policies, leaving America vulnerable to the unprecedented surge of illegal immigrants we’re seeing today.

The consequences of Biden and Harris’s open-borders agenda are not theoretical—they are happening now, in real time, across America. Communities are being overrun, schools are being overwhelmed, and hardworking Americans are left to fend for themselves in a country they no longer recognize.

The American dream—once the hope of prosperity, safety, and opportunity—is slipping away for many, replaced by overcrowded classrooms, strained healthcare systems, and deteriorating neighborhoods.

The Biden-Harris administration, in their blind pursuit of progressive policies, has chosen to abandon American families in favor of appeasing radical left-wing groups who want to see the U.S. turn into a borderless nation. But the people of Ohio—and Americans everywhere—are waking up to the damage being done. As that Ohio grandfather said, “This migrant problem is not a red state, blue state thing… It’s our whole government. It’s all of them.”

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Radical Left is continuously trying to claim that the news coming out of Springfield is fake. But the immigration crisis is very real.

And the Ohio Governor has spoken out and revealed what is really going on in Springfield.

As the radical left continues to claim that there is no problem in Springfield, Ohio, the reality on the ground is far different. Governor Mike DeWine’s recent announcement to send the Ohio State Highway Patrol and allocate $2.5 million to the beleaguered community highlights just how out of touch the Biden-Harris administration is with the chaos their open-border policies have created.

🚨BREAKING: Ohio Governor Mike DeWine is now sending State Troopers into Springfield, OH along with millions in funding to address the Haitian migrant crisis there, saying:

"The federal government has not demonstrated that they have any kind of plan to deal with the issue."… pic.twitter.com/Bewr4tH6g5

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) September 11, 2024

Springfield, once a quiet community, has seen its streets transformed by a flood of 20,000 Haitian immigrants since 2020. Local residents have faced an alarming rise in issues that range from overcrowded hospitals and schools to dangerous driving on the roads.

DeWine’s move, while necessary, is a stopgap measure to address a much larger issue that Washington refuses to acknowledge.

The Biden-Harris administration’s Cuba-Haiti-Nicaragua-Venezuela (CHNV) parole program, under which many of the migrants arrived, is a glaring example of their reckless immigration policies. Under this program, thousands of migrants have entered communities like Springfield with no real plan for assimilation or assistance.

The Department of Homeland Security briefly paused the program after concerns over fraud arose, but the damage had already been done.

Instead of facing the consequences of their decisions, Biden and Harris continue to push their failed narrative that open borders strengthen the country. They’ve left local communities like Springfield to fend for themselves, all while pretending that the chaos and disruption these policies bring are mere figments of conservative imagination. This is the same administration that has repeatedly turned a blind eye to the suffering of everyday Americans while touting their so-called ‘progressive’ values.

Governor DeWine, in sharp contrast to the federal government’s inaction, has taken swift and decisive steps to mitigate the disaster unfolding in Springfield. While DeWine made it clear that he doesn’t oppose legal immigration, he criticized the lack of support from Washington in dealing with the consequences of their failed immigration policies.

As he stated, “The federal government has not demonstrated that they have any kind of plan to deal with the issue. We will not walk away.”

DeWine’s decision to send Ohio State Highway Patrol officers to Springfield addresses a critical safety concern. Local law enforcement has struggled to manage the influx of drivers unfamiliar with U.S. road rules.

In a press release, DeWine made it clear that the troopers will patrol the roads with the highest crash rates, ensuring that erratic drivers who pose risks to others will be held accountable. This stands in stark contrast to the Biden-Harris administration’s hands-off approach to enforcing the law.

DeWine has also allocated $2.5 million over the next two years to address healthcare needs and provide resources to the community. The funding will go toward driver education, translation services, and more vaccines for children, reflecting the strain that this influx of migrants has placed on local infrastructure.

Yet, even with this effort, DeWine acknowledges that more needs to be done. As he noted, “These dramatic surges impact every citizen of the community, every citizen.”

Springfield is not the only community feeling the pressure. DeWine warned that other Ohio cities, such as Findlay and Lima, will soon face similar challenges as more migrants arrive. Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost echoed these concerns, instructing his office to explore legal options to prevent the federal government from dumping unlimited numbers of migrants into Ohio communities.

The left’s refusal to acknowledge the detrimental effects of their policies is infuriating to many Ohioans. Moms wait for hours in emergency rooms with sick children due to overcrowding, drivers face increased dangers on the road, and children attend schools where classrooms are becoming more crowded by the day.

Yet the Biden-Harris administration remains silent, unwilling to step in and provide the support needed to alleviate these issues.

Instead of addressing these legitimate concerns, left-wing pundits and politicians continue to gaslight the American public, pretending that the surge of migrants is nothing more than a minor inconvenience. The reality is that it’s far worse than that. Springfield, like so many other American cities, is being overwhelmed, and the Biden administration is sitting idly by as the problem festers.

Let’s not forget that Kamala Harris, who has been tasked with handling immigration policy since day one of this administration, has been nothing short of a disaster. While Harris claims to be “tough” on immigration, her actions tell a different story. The border crisis has only worsened under her watch, and the surge of illegal immigration continues to spiral out of control.

Harris has consistently flip-flopped on immigration policy, lacking a coherent strategy to tackle the border crisis. She touts compassion and humane treatment but ignores the harsh reality faced by communities like Springfield that bear the brunt of the administration’s weak border enforcement. Under the Biden-Harris regime, illegal immigration has surged, and it’s local governments and taxpayers who are left picking up the pieces.

The radical left continues to gaslight the American people, insisting that there is no crisis in Springfield or other communities experiencing similar surges. But as Governor DeWine, Attorney General Yost, and local residents can attest, the situation is dire.

While the left dismisses concerns as fearmongering, the reality is that communities are being torn apart by the consequences of Biden-Harris policies.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.