Trump is enemy number one to the Left. Now their followers are taking matters into their own hands.

And a brazen assassination plot on Donald Trump left lawmakers completely baffled.

A Disturbing Threat in Pennsylvania’s Heartland

In Butler, Pennsylvania—a community still reeling from last year’s shocking assassination attempt on President Donald Trump—another chilling threat has emerged.

Federal charges unsealed Friday reveal that 32-year-old Shawn Monper, a local resident, allegedly vowed to kill Trump, immigration officers, and key federal figures, including those appointed by the president.

His brazen YouTube comment, “Nah, we just need to start killing people, Trump, Elon, all the heads of agencies Trump appointed, and anyone who stands in the way,” signals a dangerous intent that federal authorities are taking seriously, underscoring the ongoing challenges Trump faces as a polarizing leader.

Monper’s arrest Wednesday at his Butler home, just five miles from the site of July’s attack, shows law enforcement’s swift response to protect Trump and the nation.

Charged with four counts of threatening federal officials and law enforcement, Monper’s case highlights the resolve to safeguard America’s leaders, particularly a president whose bold agenda continues to inspire both loyalty and opposition.

Escalating Rhetoric and Firearm Fears

Hiding behind the username “Mr Satan,” Monper didn’t stop at targeting Trump. His online tirades grew darker, with comments claiming he’d been amassing firearms and ammunition since November’s election. “Eventually [I’m] going to do a mass shooting,” he allegedly wrote on March 13, a statement that sent alarm bells ringing.

Authorities noted Monper secured a gun permit shortly after Trump’s January 20 inauguration, raising concerns about his capacity to act on his threats.

Monper’s vitriol also turned toward Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers, whom he branded as “terrorist people” in a March post, adding, “we need to start killing them.” Such rhetoric not only threatens public safety but also attacks the very agents working to secure America’s borders—a priority Trump has championed relentlessly.

In Butler, a place that knows the sting of political violence, these words carry extra weight, reminding residents of the need for vigilance.

Justice Department Stands Firm for Safety

The Justice Department, under U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, is sending a clear message: threats against Trump or any public servant will face severe consequences. “Rest assured that whenever and wherever threats of assassination or mass violence occur, this Department of Justice will find, arrest, and prosecute the suspect to the fullest extent of the law,” Bondi declared.

Her commitment reflects a broader effort to shield the nation’s leaders and citizens, especially in a time when Trump’s leadership is steering America toward renewal.

Butler, Pennsylvania, etched into history by the July rally where a 20-year-old gunman wounded Trump, two spectators, and killed a heroic father shielding his family, doesn’t need another scar.

That attack, from a rooftop just outside the Butler Farm Show grounds, tested the community’s spirit but strengthened its resolve. Today, as Trump pushes forward with his vision for a stronger America, Monper’s arrest serves as a reminder that protecting the president and the nation’s security remains paramount, no matter the obstacles.

The US and China are at each other’s throats. Now it’s coming to a head.

And the Pentagon is on high alert after China made one unmistakable move.

Standing Firm Against Chinese Aggression

America’s resolve to protect freedom and stability in the Indo-Pacific is being tested as China escalates its military maneuvers around Taiwan.

On Thursday, Adm. Samuel Paparo, commander of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, delivered a sobering warning to the Senate Armed Services Committee, describing Beijing’s actions as more than mere drills—they’re “rehearsals” for potential conflict.

His words underscore the United States’ unwavering commitment to countering threats that could destabilize a region vital to global prosperity.

“China’s unprecedented aggression and military modernization poses a serious threat to the homeland, our allies and our partners,” Paparo declared, pointing to a 300% surge in China’s military pressure on Taiwan.

For America, this isn’t just about geopolitics—it’s about defending the principles of sovereignty and self-determination that Taiwan embodies against Beijing’s push for forced “reunification,” a move the U.S. and its allies reject as a violation of the island’s will and regional harmony.

Taiwan’s Defiance Inspires Global Support

China’s aggressive posturing, driven by its “One China” policy, seeks to intimidate Taiwan, a vibrant democracy that stands tall as a sovereign nation despite Beijing’s claims. The U.S., while officially recognizing the policy, has ramped up warnings against any forceful takeover, prioritizing stability over coercion. Paparo noted that China’s tactics are misfiring:

“While the [People’s Liberation Army] PLA attempts to intimidate the people of Taiwan and demonstrate coercive capabilities, these actions are backfiring, drawing increased global attention and accelerating Taiwan’s own defense preparations.” This resilience reflects the spirit of freedom America champions worldwide.

Taiwan’s defiance, bolstered by growing international support, sends a powerful message. As China’s actions draw scrutiny, nations are rallying to ensure the Indo-Pacific remains a bastion of open commerce and democratic values—core pillars of America’s vision for a free world.

The U.S. stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Taiwan, reinforcing its right to chart its own course without fear of authoritarian overreach.

America’s Call to Outpace and Outbuild

The challenge isn’t just China’s saber-rattling—it’s their relentless drive to outpace U.S. military capabilities.

Paparo laid bare the stakes: “China’s outproducing the United States in air missile, maritime and space capability and accelerating these.” From fighters rolling out at a 1.2-to-1 clip to shipbuilding at a staggering 6-to-1.8 ratio, Beijing’s industrial edge threatens to tilt the balance. Yet Paparo remains steadfast: “I remain confident in our deterrence posture, but the trajectory must change.”

To reclaim the lead, America must tackle its own hurdles head-on. “We’ve got to get at the problems of why we don’t have enough [of a] combat logistics force – and that’s shipbuilding. Why we don’t have enough labor,” Paparo urged, calling for better pay and incentives to recruit and retain talent.

This isn’t just about matching China’s output—it’s about harnessing the ingenuity and grit that have always defined American strength, ensuring the U.S. remains the world’s unrivaled defender of liberty and security.

Like it or not, NATO and the US are tied at the hip. And now we could be dragged all the way into war.

Because NATO released terrifying news about an imminent attack.

A Looming Threat to Global Connectivity

The world’s digital lifeline is under siege, and telecommunication giants are sounding the alarm. Companies like Vodafone, Telefonica, and Orange have issued a stark warning to NATO about Russia’s potential to wreak havoc on undersea cables using its elusive “shadow fleet.”

These cables, snaking across ocean floors, are the arteries of the internet, carrying nearly all global data. The fear? A calculated strike could plunge the world into a “worldwide internet blackout,” with catastrophic ripple effects.

“A submarine cable is a cable laid on the seabed between land-based stations, usually to carry telecommunication signals or power. Hundreds of cables crisscross the globe carrying 98% of internet traffic, making them essential to the global economy,” Forbes outlined, underscoring their critical role.

With 95% of international data zipping through over 500 cables, any disruption could grind financial markets, communication networks, and essential services to a halt, threatening the interconnected world we take for granted.

Escalating Sabotage in the Baltic and Beyond

The threat isn’t hypothetical—damage is already happening. Since October 2023, 11 undersea cables, mostly in the Baltic Sea, have been compromised, raising suspicions of deliberate sabotage.

NATO didn’t sit idly by; in January, it deployed 10 ships to the region as part of “Baltic Sentry,” a response to a string of attacks on cables and pipelines following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

“NATO members said they reserved the right to take action against ships suspected of posing a security threat,” NBC News reported, signaling a readiness to confront shadowy actors head-on.

The telecom giants’ letter, as covered by The Daily Mail, pulled no punches:

“The repercussions of damage to subsea cables extend far beyond Europe, potentially affecting global internet and power infrastructure, international communications, financial transactions and critical services worldwide. Subsea cable security must be a cornerstone of broader infrastructure protection efforts. By acting now, we can safeguard the networks that underpin our shared future.” Their call to action emphasizes the urgency of shielding this vital infrastructure from escalating threats.

Russia’s Shadow Fleet and Vulnerable Networks

Russia’s capabilities add a chilling dimension to the crisis. In September 2021, its spy ship Yantar was spotted lurking in the English Channel, equipped with two unmanned submersibles capable of severing cables.

“Rossiya, a Russian state TV network, has claimed the ship is able to cut Internet cables and jam underwater sensors,” The Daily Mail revealed, hinting at Moscow’s brazen confidence. Such vessels, part of Russia’s so-called shadow fleet, could strike silently, leaving nations scrambling to respond.

Matt Western, chair of the U.K. committee overseeing national security strategy, didn’t mince words in January:

“As the geopolitical environment worsens, foreign states are seeking asymmetric ways to hold us at risk. Our internet cable network looks like an increasingly vulnerable soft underbelly.” His warning captures the stakes—undersea cables are a critical yet exposed link in global systems. With tensions rising and incidents mounting, NATO and its allies face a race against time to fortify these networks before a single cut triggers chaos.

Musk has teamed up with Trump to slash the federal government. Now it’s time to put his money where his mouth is.

And he left D.C. bureaucrats scrambling with an unexpected announcement.

Slashing Waste, Boosting Efficiency

Elon Musk, the visionary leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), dropped a bombshell at Thursday’s Cabinet meeting alongside President Donald Trump: his team is poised to carve out over $150 billion in savings for Fiscal Year 2026 by targeting government waste and fraud.

This isn’t just a number—it’s a promise to streamline a bloated system and deliver real value to American taxpayers. With Musk’s knack for cutting through inefficiencies, the plan signals a bold step toward a leaner, smarter federal government.

“We anticipate savings in FY 26 from reduction of waste and fraud by $150 billion. And, I mean, and some of it is just absurd. Like people getting unemployment insurance who haven’t been born yet,” Musk quipped, highlighting the kind of jaw-dropping mismanagement his team is rooting out.

A Target-Rich Hunt for Savings

Musk’s confidence stems from what he sees as a government riddled with low-hanging fruit for reform.

“People ask me how are you going to find waste and fraud in a government? I’m like, well, actually, just go in any direction. That’s how you find it. It’s very common. It’s, as a military would say, a target-rich environment,” he said, painting a picture of a system so flush with inefficiencies that cleanup feels almost effortless.

His track record of disrupting stagnant industries gives weight to his words—where others see bureaucracy, Musk sees opportunity.

Just a day before the Cabinet meeting, DOGE flexed its muscle by axing 108 “wasteful contracts” with a ceiling value of $250 million, locking in $70 million in immediate savings.

Among the culprits? A $14,000 Department of Health and Human Services deal for an “executive transformational leadership training program” that reeks of corporate fluff, and a $5.2 million contract with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management for vague “strategic advisory” services to “improve and transform” processes.

These cuts aren’t just numbers—they’re proof that Musk’s team is diving deep to eliminate spending that doesn’t serve the American people.

Better Services, Smarter Spending

What sets this effort apart is its focus on outcomes, not just slashing budgets for the sake of it.

“So, I think we’re doing a lot of good, and in excellent collaboration with the Cabinet, to achieve these savings. And it will actually result in better services for the American people. And then we’re going to be spending their tax dollars in a way that is sensible and fair and good,” Musk emphasized. His vision aligns with a broader push to restore trust in government by ensuring every dollar is spent with purpose.

This isn’t about dismantling essential services—it’s about redirecting resources to where they matter most. By working hand-in-hand with Trump’s Cabinet, Musk’s DOGE is setting a new standard for accountability.

The early wins, like scrapping those 108 contracts, show a team that’s not afraid to make tough calls. With billions on the line and a leader like Musk at the helm, the drive to cut waste while boosting efficiency feels like a win for taxpayers who deserve a government that works as hard as they do.

The Bidens have escaped justice for years. But now it’s all coming due.

Now Hunter Biden was just thrown to the wolves by this whistleblower.

Hunter Biden’s Power Play Unveiled

Devon Archer, once a close ally in Hunter Biden’s business ventures, dropped a bombshell in a fresh interview with Just the News—his first since President Donald Trump granted him a pardon last month.

Echoing his testimony to Congress last year, Archer didn’t mince words: Hunter’s gig was to play “lobbyist” and wield the weight of “a very powerful name” to open doors.

Specifically, Archer said Hunter’s job “was to, you know, pave a path for success of Burisma by having kind of a halo from the U.S.” No surprises there, given the Biden name’s shine during those years.

Archer and Hunter both held cushy seats on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian natural gas heavyweight.

Records show Hunter raked in a cool $999,996 from the company in 2016—though that paycheck conveniently slimmed down to $665,000 in 2017, right after his dad, Joe Biden, stepped down as vice president. Funny how timing works.

Joe Biden’s Shadow in the Dealings

Archer didn’t stop at Hunter’s role. He pulled back the curtain further, claiming former President Joe Biden was in on the business chatter with his son.

“I mean, there’s absolutely no doubt in my mind,” Archer stated flatly. The evidence? Hunter played matchmaker, introducing his high-powered father to foreign players while Joe still held sway in office.

Take 2013, when then-Vice President Biden met Jonathan Li, a Chinese businessman running Bohai Capital, thanks to Hunter’s networking. Or 2014, when Joe joined Hunter for a cozy dinner with Russian oligarch Yelena Baturina. Just casual family catch-ups, right?

Meanwhile, Joe Biden’s legacy took a hit before he exited the White House. Despite earlier vows to keep his hands clean, he issued a blanket pardon for Hunter, covering any federal crimes from January 1, 2014, to December 1, 2024. The U-turn sparked a firestorm, with critics calling it a glaring red flag after years of murky dealings.

Fallout and Finger-Pointing

Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., and head of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, didn’t hold back. “History will show Joe Biden and his family were the most corrupt occupiers of the White House of any family in the history of America,” he told The Daily Signal.

It’s a bold claim, but one that’s gaining traction as the Biden era’s loose ends unravel.

As for Archer, he’s breathing easier after Trump’s pardon erased his 2018 conviction tied to Native American tribal bonds. Now free to speak, his account paints a picture of a Biden family machine that thrived on influence—until the wheels started wobbling when Joe’s vice-presidential clout faded.

What’s left is a lingering question: how much of this “halo” was earned, and how much was just borrowed from a taxpayer-funded pedestal?

Trump and his team aren’t putting up with anybody’s games. Instead, they’re forging their own paths.

Now The Trump White House shocked the ‘woke’ Left with an unexpected reality check.

White House Stands Firm on Truth Over Trends

The Trump White House press team is taking a no-nonsense stance, declining to engage with reporters who flaunt pronouns in their email signatures.

Their reasoning? Those who reject “biological reality” can’t be relied upon to deliver straight-shooting stories. It’s a bold move that’s got the media buzzing—and some outlets squirming.

New York Times scribe Michael Grynbaum flagged three separate instances where press office staff, led by the sharp-tongued Karoline Leavitt, brushed off queries from pronoun-sporting journalists.

“As a matter of policy, we do not respond to reporters with pronouns in their bios,” Leavitt told a Times reporter sniffing around a climate observatory story.

Press Office Doubles Down on Principle

The policy isn’t just talk—it’s action. Grynbaum dug deeper, citing a case where Katie Miller, a top adviser at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), stonewalled a reporter over records because of their pronoun display.

“As a matter of policy, I don’t respond to people who use pronouns in their signatures as it shows they ignore scientific realities and therefore ignore facts,” Miller said, doubling down with, “This applies to all reporters who have pronouns in their signature.”

Leavitt backed her up when pressed by Grynbaum, emailing, “Any reporter who chooses to put their preferred pronouns in their bio clearly does not care about biological reality or truth and therefore cannot be trusted to write an honest story.”

White House comms chief Steven Cheung piled on with a zinger: “If The New York Times spent the same amount of time actually reporting the truth as they do being obsessed with pronouns, maybe they would be a half-decent publication.”

Media’s Pronoun Play Meets a Wall

The ripple effect’s hitting beyond the Times. Grynbaum noted other outlets facing the same cold shoulder when their reporters flash pronouns. Crooked Media’s Matt Berg even ran a little test, tossing pronouns into his signature to see if the White House would bite.

Spoiler: They didn’t. “I find it baffling that they care more about pronouns than giving journalists accurate information, but here we are,” Berg griped to the Times.

Meanwhile, the administration’s keeping its focus where it counts—rolling back gender identity fluff across government, from military bans to sports rules.

A Times spokesperson whined about “evading tough questions,” but Leavitt held the line, telling Fox News Digital, “Any reporter who chooses to put their preferred pronouns in their bio clearly does not care about biological reality or truth and therefore cannot be trusted to write an honest story.”

Sounds like a press office that’s done playing games—and ready to back a leader who calls it like he sees it.

America is hanging on Trump’s every word. And this means more than most.

Because Donald Trump made an announcement about tariffs that you won’t want to miss.

Trump Touts Global Begging After Tariff Bombshell

President Trump crowed triumphantly on Tuesday, boasting that his audacious move to hammer roughly 90 nations with hefty tariffs—topping out at a jaw-dropping 104% on China—has world leaders groveling at his feet.

“I’m telling you, these countries are calling us up, kissing my ass,” he proclaimed to a fired-up crowd at the National Republican Congressional Committee Dinner, mere hours before the tariffs kicked in.

With a smirk, he mimicked their pleas:

“They are dying to make a deal. ‘Please, please, Sir, make a deal. I’ll do anything. I’ll do anything, sir!’” Keeping the names of the pleading nations under wraps, Trump painted a picture of a world bending to his will—a testament to his unrelenting trade strategy.

Slamming GOP Doubters With Swagger

Not one to let dissent slide, Trump turned his fire on so-called “rebel” Republicans who’ve dared to question his tariff blitz and push for Congress to wrestle back control.

“I see some rebel Republican, some guy who wants to grandstand, say, ‘I think that Congress should take over negotiations.’ Let me tell you, you don’t negotiate like I negotiate,” he snapped, oozing confidence.

“Oh that’s what I need, I need some guy telling me how to negotiate.” Brushing off the naysayers, he doubled down:

“I know what the hell I’m doing. I know what I’m doing, and you know what I’m doing too.” It’s classic Trump—unapologetic, brash, and certain his dealmaking chops are unmatched, a stance that’s got his base cheering while the establishment squirms.

Tariff Titan Punches Back at China

The tariffs, slamming both allies and foes, roared into effect just after midnight, piling onto an existing 10% levy from April 5.

China bore the brunt, slapped with a 104% total rate—stacking a fresh 50% retaliatory hit on top of a 34% reciprocal duty and a prior 20% fee—after Beijing fired back with its own 34% tariffs on U.S. goods.

“It was a mistake for China to retaliate,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt declared earlier Tuesday, setting the stage for Trump’s counterpunch.

“The president, when America is punched, he punches back harder. That’s why there will be 104% tariffs going into effect on China tonight at midnight.”

China whined to the World Trade Organization on Wednesday, warning that the U.S. move “dangerously escalated” tensions and “threatened to further destabilize global trade,” but Trump’s camp sees it as proof he’s got Beijing on the ropes—a fighter who doesn’t flinch.

Biden has been out of the limelight for months now. But he’s been thrust right back into view.

Because secret documents expose the extent of Biden’s collusion with China.

In a series of clandestine meetings, Biden administration State Department officials engaged in hush-hush conversations with their Beijing counterparts regarding the notorious Chinese spy balloon that breached U.S. airspace back in 2023. Trump administration sources reveal that these talks delved into the potential fallout the balloon’s exposure could unleash on the delicate U.S.-China relationship.

The saga began when U.S. authorities clocked the intrusive spy balloon infiltrating American skies on January 28, 2023. A mere six days later, on February 4, an Air Force fighter jet blasted the Chinese intruder out of the sky off South Carolina’s coast, following the Pentagon’s belated statement on the incident two days prior.

Internal State Department documents, cited by two Trump administration officials to Fox News Digital, unveil that Biden officials huddled with Beijing on February 1, 2023, to grapple with the balloon conundrum and ponder the ramifications of spilling the beans to the public.

A leaked readout of a tête-à-tête between Blinken and a senior Chinese diplomat quotes Blinken warning that public revelation of the balloon’s presence could bear “profound implications for our relationship” with China, especially as efforts to steady bilateral ties with Beijing hung in the balance.

The same readout hinted that the balloon brouhaha threatened to throw a wrench in Blinken’s early February 2023 travel itinerary to China, a trip ultimately deferred to June.

Meanwhile, a former Biden official disclosed to Fox News Digital that the State Department hauled in senior Chinese diplomat Zhu Haiquan on February 1, 2023, to demand the balloon’s removal and threaten U.S. action if China didn’t comply.

“Former Secretary Blinken advocated strongly to tell the American people about China’s rogue balloon, which is exactly what happened,” a spokesperson for the ex-secretary asserted to Fox News Digital on Tuesday.

“He has a long history of being tough on China while actually delivering results.”

Concurrently, another top State Department official held covert talks with Chinese counterparts on February 1, 2023. According to a readout cited by Trump administration officials, this official cautioned that the longer the balloon lingered, the greater the risk of public exposure and the ensuing headaches in managing the crisis.

The Pentagon finally broke its silence on February 2, 2023, admitting the U.S. government had sniffed out a “high-altitude surveillance balloon.” Then-White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters Biden was briefed on January 31, 2023, but remained tight-lipped on why the administration dawdled until February 2 to go public.

Marco Rubio, then a Florida senator and now Secretary of State, relentlessly slammed the Biden administration’s sluggish disclosure and delayed takedown of the balloon.

Appearing on CNN with Jake Tapper, Rubio branded Biden’s initial inaction as the “beginning of dereliction of duty,” questioning, “Why didn’t the president go on television? He has the ability to convene the country in cameras and basically explain what we’re dealing with here.”

On February 4, 2023, an Air Force F-22 Raptor from Langley Air Force Base in Virginia obliterated the balloon off South Carolina’s coast with an AIM-9X Sidewinder missile.

The Pentagon conceded that while the balloon posed no military or physical threat, its airspace incursion trampled U.S. sovereignty, debunking China’s “weather balloon” excuse as hogwash.

“This was a PRC surveillance balloon,” a senior defense official told reporters. “This surveillance balloon purposely traversed the United States and Canada, and we are confident it was seeking to monitor sensitive military sites.”

Post-shootdown, the Pentagon revealed that similar Chinese balloons had buzzed U.S. airspace at least thrice during Trump’s first term. The senior defense official noted Biden greenlit the balloon’s demise “as soon as the mission could be accomplished without undue risk to us civilians under the balloon’s path,” citing debris concerns. In June 2023, the Pentagon backtracked, claiming the balloon likely didn’t snag any intel during its U.S. joyride.

Blinken now hobnobs as a speaker with CAA Speakers, alongside A-list celebs. A Biden spokesperson didn’t immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

Trump made a name for himself with firing people. Now he’s bringing that energy to Washington, D.C. once again.

And Donald Trump rattled Capitol Hill with this high-profile firing.

A Bold Shift in Military Leadership

The Trump administration has decisively removed a senior NATO official, Navy Vice Admiral Shoshana Chatfield, from her post, aligning with recommendations from a conservative research group focused on streamlining Pentagon priorities.

Chatfield, the sole woman on NATO’s military committee, was let go over the weekend with no official reason provided, according to various sources.

As one of the few female three-star Navy officers and the first woman to helm the Naval War College until 2023, her departure marks a significant moment in the administration’s ongoing recalibration of military leadership.

Reports indicate that Adm. Christopher Grady, acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, informed Chatfield of the decision, stating the administration sought a new direction for the role.

Sources cited by the Associated Press suggest Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth finalized the call last week, though it remains uncertain if President Donald Trump directly weighed in. Reuters broke the story first, leaving observers to ponder whether this move ties into broader U.S. policy shifts regarding NATO.

Prioritizing Strength Over Symbolism

Trump and Hegseth have made no secret of their mission to root out what they see as distracting “woke” agendas from the military, emphasizing a return to core national security goals.

This vision has spurred the removal of leaders tied to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts, alongside the scrapping of related programs and materials—like the U.S. Naval Academy’s recent purge of nearly 400 DEI-focused library books. Chatfield’s dismissal fits into this pattern, reflecting a leadership style that values results over representation.

Her inclusion on a list from the American Accountability Foundation (AAF) likely sealed her fate. In December, the conservative outfit urged Hegseth to oust 20 senior officers, including Chatfield, for their perceived overemphasis on DEI. The AAF flagged a 2015 speech where she lamented the House of Representatives being “80% males,” declaring “our diversity is our strength.”

They also criticized her use of a Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute slide claiming, “Investing in gender equality and women’s empowerment can unlock human potential on a transformational scale.” To the administration, such rhetoric may signal a misplaced focus at a time when military readiness demands undivided attention.

A Decorated Career Meets Political Crosswinds

Chatfield’s 38-year career is undeniably impressive—Navy helicopter pilot, commander of a joint reconstruction team in Afghanistan, and a key player on NATO’s military committee, advising the North Atlantic Council and Nuclear Planning Group.

Yet, her exit has sparked sharp rebukes from Democrats like Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, who called it “deeply disturbing” and accused Trump of undermining alliances. “Trump’s relentless attacks on our alliances and his careless dismissal of decorated military officials make us less safe and weaken our position across the world,” Warner posted on X.

Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island echoed the outrage, labeling the move “disgraceful” and praising Chatfield as “among the finest military officers our nation has to offer.” He highlighted her “unblemished” service and slammed Trump for sidelining talent, noting the president has axed 10 generals and admirals since taking office—including NSA head General Timothy Haugh and Navy Chief Admiral Lisa Franchetti.

“I cannot fathom how anyone could stand silently by while the President causes great harm to our military and our nation,” Reed said, pressing Republicans to demand answers from Trump and Hegseth. For an administration intent on projecting strength, these shake-ups signal a willingness to make tough calls, even if they ruffle feathers.

Trump is weeding out the Swamp. And they aren’t happy about it.

Now Homeland Security pulled out the lie detector test on these unelected bureaucrats.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is doubling down on its no-nonsense approach to ferreting out leakers, proudly standing by its use of lie-detector tests to safeguard sensitive information. Fox News Digital got the scoop on how DHS is tackling internal breaches with gusto, showing it’s ready to protect national interests at all costs.

“Under Secretary Noem’s leadership, DHS is unapologetic about its efforts to root out leakers that undermine national security,” Tricia McLaughlin, DHS’ assistant secretary for public affairs, told Fox News Digital on Monday.

“We are agnostic about your standing, tenure, political appointment or status as a career civil servant – we will track down leakers and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.”

Her words carry a clear message: no one’s off-limits when it comes to keeping the agency’s secrets safe.

This hardline stance comes into sharper focus after Politico dropped a report last Friday about FEMA Chief Cameron Hamilton facing a polygraph test in March.

The test followed a sit-down between DHS and Corey Lewandowski, a key advisor to President Donald Trump, who’s been vocal about shaking things up.

The meeting reportedly centered on Trump’s push to “eliminate” FEMA—an agency he’s slammed for dropping the ball on disaster relief.

Hamilton passed the test, proving he wasn’t the source of any leaks, but the incident underscores DHS’s determination to plug holes amid Trump’s bold agenda.

Polygraphs aren’t some shiny new toy for DHS—they’re a well-worn tool across agencies like the FBI, CIA, and ATF, used for everything from vetting new hires to sniffing out security risks.

The FBI, for instance, ramped up its use of lie detectors after the 2001 arrest of Robert Hanssen, a rogue agent caught spying for Russia.

The Pentagon, too, jumped on the bandwagon in March, launching a probe into leaks that might involve polygraphs for Defense Department staff, as Fox Digital previously noted. It’s a tried-and-true method, and DHS is leaning in hard.

McLaughlin’s been vocal about this mission before, taking to X in February to affirm DHS’s stance after chatter about polygraphing staff over immigration raid leaks. “The Department of Homeland Security is a national security agency,” she posted. “We can, should, and will polygraph personnel.”

That same month, Secretary Kristi Noem laid down the law with an internal directive, mandating that polygraph questions zero in on unauthorized media or nonprofit contacts, per Bloomberg Government. It’s a sign DHS means business, especially with Trump’s team pushing for tighter control.

The stakes got real when Border Czar Tom Homan speculated in February that a leak had tipped off illegal immigrants about ICE raids in Colorado and California. That slip allegedly let Tren de Aragua gang members dodge arrest—a frustrating setback that only fuels DHS’s resolve.

The agency’s already got polygraphs baked into its hiring process for Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers, ensuring they’re fit to serve. “The federal government uses the polygraph exam to understand an applicants’ past behavior, personal connections and personal integrity,” DHS explains online. “Almost every Border Patrol Agent, Customs and Border Protection Officer, and Air and Marine Operations Agent who has joined CBP has taken, and passed, a Polygraph Exam.”

With Trump’s influence steering the ship, DHS isn’t just playing defense—it’s going on offense to lock down leaks and back up his vision. From FEMA critiques to border security, the agency’s signaling it’s all in on delivering results, polygraph in hand.

The Left doesn’t like being called out on their shenanigans. When they do, they lose their minds.

And now Jake Tapper had a deranged meltdown on CNN after a guest said this one sentence.

Tapper Pushes Back on Political Labels

In a lively Sunday exchange on CNN’s “State of the Union,” host Jake Tapper bristled at being pegged as a leftist while grilling Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins about President Donald Trump’s bold tariff moves.

The conversation took a sharp turn when Tapper pressed Rollins on the timeline for the tariff shake-up.

“So how long do you anticipate this tariff chaos is going to be going on? Thirty days, 60 days, 90 days?” he asked, his tone suggesting skepticism about the administration’s game plan.

Rollins, unfazed, shot back with context. “I think it’s really important to realize that last Wednesday was when the president announced this new American order, the new American economic plan,” she said.

“We’re now two days in. You’ve got two days of data, everyone, especially on your side, on the left, is freaking out.”

Tapper didn’t miss a beat, cutting in with, “I’m not on the left,” sparking a chuckle from Rollins. “All right, Jake, thank you,” she replied, clearly enjoying the moment.

Tapper’s quick denial might raise eyebrows, especially among those who’ve watched him since he joined CNN in 2013. Conservatives have long called him out for what they see as a relentless edge against Republicans and Trump, though the network staunchly defends him as a straight shooter.

It’s a familiar dance—Tapper dodging labels while critics question whether his coverage leans harder one way than he lets on.

Trump’s Tariff Play Unfolds

The tariff plan at the heart of the debate is no small tweak. Trump’s administration has rolled out a 10% baseline tariff on all U.S. imports, effective as of Saturday, with tailored rates hitting countries that slap higher tariffs on American goods—set to kick in on April 9.

It’s a muscular move, one that’s already stirring the pot globally and giving talking heads plenty to chew on. Rollins framed it as a long-overdue reset, a chance to flex America’s economic might and put its interests first.

“This whole concept is about rebuilding an American economy around American goods, around American industry,” she explained, painting a picture of a nation tired of playing by others’ rules.

“We do already live under a tariff regime in this country, but it’s the tariff regime of China, of Mexico, of Brazil, of Australia, of countries that, Mexico won’t take our corn, Australia won’t take our beef. The country of Honduras takes more pork than the entire European Union does — American pork, I should say.” Her point? The old system’s been lopsided, and Trump’s flipping the script.

A Case for Change—and Results

Rollins didn’t stop at diagnostics; she doubled down on why this shift matters. “We already have 50 countries that have come to the table over the last few days, over the last weeks, that are willing and desperate to talk to us,” she said, hinting at early wins.

“We are the economic engine of the world, and it’s finally time that someone, President Trump, stood up for America.” Her optimism stood in stark contrast to the hand-wringing from some corners—perhaps the same ones Tapper’s network often amplifies—predicting “chaos” instead of opportunity.

For Rollins, it’s about time for a shake-up. “It was time for a change” in how America handles tariffs, she insisted, projecting confidence that Trump’s gambit would soon pay off with a “positive outcome.” While CNN might keep the spotlight on potential pitfalls, Rollins’ take suggests there’s more to the story—a narrative of American grit and leverage that’s already got the world knocking on the U.S.’s door. Whether that holds up, or it’s just Cabinet cheerleading, remains the million-dollar question.

Harris has been quiet since being thrashed by Donald Trump. But now she’s back in the spotlight and not for good reason.

Because she resurfaced to make the most humiliatingly moronic statement.

In a stunning twist, former Vice President Kamala Harris was reportedly caught off guard by her 2024 election drubbing at the hands of President Donald Trump, having swallowed the hype that victory was in the bag, according to a revealing new book.

“She was completely shocked, and [Harris’ running mate] Tim Walz was shocked,” The Hill’s Amie Parnes dished on the podcast “Somebody’s Gotta Win with Tara Palmeri,” which dropped Thursday.

Parnes unpacked the juicy details from her latest book, FIGHT: Inside the Wildest Battle for the White House, co-written with NBC’s Jonathan Allen. The tome dives into the chaotic 2024 presidential race, spotlighting the upheaval after former President Biden bailed on his re-election bid, leaving Harris to helm the Democratic ticket amid a storm of uncertainty.

Painting a vivid picture of election night disarray, Parnes described Walz holed up in his hotel room, “stunned.”

“He has no words. And people are kind of explaining to him, same thing with her. And she’s like, are you sure? Have we done a recount? Should we do a recount?” Parnes recounted on the podcast, capturing the disbelief that gripped Harris and Walz as their dreams crumbled.

“They thought that they were going to win. And so, you know, when they come back now and say, ‘Oh no, we didn’t really have a chance.’ No, that’s not what they were thinking. They thought they were going to win,” she emphasized, dismantling any post-loss spin.

Parnes revealed that Harris campaign staffers felt “gaslit” by their higher-ups, who’d fed them rosy assurances that “things were looking good” for Harris—only to watch it all fall apart.

Harris herself “bought the hype” that she was outperforming reality, Parnes noted, pointing to a campaign intoxicated by its own buzz.

“Kamala Harris was looking at her crowd size, and they felt like the vibe was strong and people were saying, ‘Oh, we have more boots on the ground. We’re doing better in fundraising,’” Parnes explained. “And she bought all of that. She bought the hype, and so did a lot of people in the campaign.”

The book dishes that Harris later griped to pals, insisting she could’ve clinched it with more time—or if Biden hadn’t hogged the spotlight by running again.

“She could have won, she told friends, if only the election was later in the calendar — or she got in earlier. In other words, Joe Biden was to blame,” the authors penned, subtly framing Harris as quick to dodge accountability.

Some of Harris’ buddies agreed, whispering that Biden’s baggage and her late start doomed her shot—though not everyone was sold on the time excuse.

“That is f—ing bonkers,” one Harris confidant reportedly scoffed. “If Election Day was October first, we might have actually somehow pulled it off. Shorter was actually better, not longer.”

A Harris advisor cut deeper, arguing the real issue wasn’t the clock—it was her lack of heft.

“I don’t think we needed more time… We needed more substance. And she did not have more substance,” the advisor bluntly stated in the book, a quiet jab at Harris’ lightweight tenure.

Adding fuel to the fire, the book spills that former President Obama wasn’t sold on Harris either, dragging his feet on an endorsement because he doubted she could take down Trump.

“He didn’t think that she was the best choice for Democrats, and he worked really behind the scenes for a long time to try to have a mini-primary, or an open convention, or a mini-primary leading to an open convention, did not have faith in her ability to win the election,” co-author Jonathan Allen told MSNBC this week.

“As it turned out, she didn’t win, but he was really working against her,” Allen added, hinting at a party elite skeptical of Harris’ hype-driven rise.