The mainstream media is doing their best to push the narrative against Trump. But now the President is fighting back.

And Trump’s Border Czar went on CNN and started throwing punches.

Border Czar Tom Homan didn’t hold back during an interview with CNN’s Kaitlan Collins on Monday night, where he forcefully defended the Trump administration’s bold and much-needed mass deportation operation.

In a heated exchange on *The Source*, Homan shut down Collins’ attempts to cast doubt on ICE’s strategy of targeting illegal aliens who have been hiding out in so-called “safe spaces” like schools, churches, and hospitals.

Collins pressed Homan, questioning what she framed as an unprecedented move. “What is the standard, I guess, to go into an elementary school?” she asked. “Because what we had heard from immigration advocates is that this is going to provide a chilling effect to parents in the school drop-off line or something of that matter.”

Homan, known for his no-nonsense approach to border enforcement, didn’t hesitate to dismantle her premise.

“It shouldn’t be a chilling effect unless your child is a terrorist or a public safety threat,” he responded.

“If they are a public safety threat, a national security threat, they should be chilled. They should be afraid, because we’re looking for them.”

Homan’s response laid bare the administration’s unwavering focus on protecting American citizens. Instead of bending to the left-wing media narrative, he reminded viewers of the real priorities: ensuring the safety of the public and defending the rule of law.

When Collins tried to pivot the discussion to parents who are illegal aliens, Homan wasn’t about to back down.

“They’re not off the table either. I mean, they’re in the country illegally, they have got a problem,” Homan said firmly.

He continued, calling out the double standard that seems to be tolerated by open-border advocates. “I mean, it’s not OK — look, we — it’s not OK to enter this country illegally. It’s a crime. And that’s the way it’s supposed to be. I wouldn’t feel comfortable if I’m in Switzerland illegally. So we’re going to enforce the laws of this country.”

Homan made it clear that under President Trump’s leadership, national security threats and public safety risks won’t find safe havens anywhere in the United States. “National security threats and public safety threats have no safe haven in this country, and we will go where we got to go,” he added.

This exchange highlights the Trump administration’s unwavering resolve to prioritize the safety of American families over political correctness.

While the mainstream media continues to parrot immigration advocacy talking points, Homan and the president are laser-focused on delivering results.

President Trump’s immigration policies have not only restored a sense of law and order but have also sent a strong message to those who think they can flout the nation’s laws with impunity.

The era of turning a blind eye to illegal immigration is over, and the administration is making it abundantly clear: America is a nation of laws, and those laws will be enforced.

Under Trump’s leadership, border security is no longer an afterthought. With strong allies like Homan at the helm, the administration is proving that it’s not afraid to tackle difficult issues head-on, even when it ruffles feathers in the media or among activist groups. The focus remains squarely on protecting Americans and upholding the sovereignty of the United States.

CNN's Kaitlan Collins tries to turn it into a scandal that ICE is entering schools. Tom Homan calmly dismantles her. pic.twitter.com/yWpK5GWlXj

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 28, 2025

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Joe Biden painted himself as the “devout” Catholic of the bunch. But now his Church is taking Trump’s side.

And the US Catholic Bishops handed Trump a major victory that is raising eyebrows.

A Welcome Surprise

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) released a statement on Jan. 26 expressing deep gratitude for President Trump’s recent pro-life actions, including an executive order and memorandum designed to eliminate taxpayer-funded abortion.

“We gratefully applaud the decision to end taxpayer-funded abortion,” stated Bishop Daniel E. Thomas of Toledo, Ohio, who serves as chairman of the USCCB Committee for Pro-Life Activities.

Trump’s executive order reversed previous administration policies that paved the way for taxpayer dollars to fund abortion.

Additionally, the reinstatement and expansion of the Mexico City Policy now ensures that U.S. foreign aid will no longer support organizations that perform or promote abortion overseas.

“A significant majority of Americans oppose being forced to support abortion through their tax dollars,” Bishop Thomas emphasized.

“I am grateful for the strengthening of policies that protect us from being compelled to participate in a culture of death, and that help us to restore a culture of life at home and abroad.”

Ruling for the American People

The USCCB highlighted a recent poll commissioned by the Knights of Columbus, revealing that 57% of Americans oppose taxpayer funding of abortion domestically, while 73% are against funding abortion abroad.

The bishops also celebrated the United States’ renewed commitment to the Geneva Consensus Declaration, an international agreement affirming women’s health, the right to life for the unborn, and the essential role of the family.

Trump had spearheaded this initiative during his first term, garnering signatures from over 30 nations before the Biden administration withdrew from it.

“It is important and encouraging to see the United States again taking leadership in affirming the right to life and the fundamental place of the family on the global stage where many pressures can be arrayed against these values,” said Bishop Thomas.

The bishops also praised Trump’s recent pardons of peaceful pro-life advocates imprisoned under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act.

“Pro-life Americans have a right to pray in public, to counsel women who are considering abortion, and to peacefully protest,” Bishop Thomas affirmed.

“We welcome support for men and women who are exercising these rights to witness to a culture of life, and, at the same time, we absolutely reject resorting to force or violence.”

These actions reflect Trump’s steadfast commitment to protecting the unborn and promoting a culture of life—values that resonate deeply with a majority of Americans and with the Catholic Church’s mission to defend life at every stage.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

We’re in uncharted waters now. And who knows how it will all shake out.

Now the Pentagon was put on lockdown for a reason you’ll have to see to believe.

The Pentagon announced Friday night a sharp reduction in social media activity across the Defense Department for the next 10 days, a move aimed at aligning military messaging with President Trump’s policy priorities.

The new directive instructs all military components, from bases to combatant commands, to suspend most social media posts beginning Saturday through February 3.

The decision is seen as part of a larger effort to refocus the Pentagon on its core mission of safeguarding America’s interests.

A defense official clarified the reasoning behind the move in the memo, stating, “This is designed to reorient the Pentagon around its core missions of keeping America safe, fielding the most lethal force on the planet, and fighting and winning wars.”

This shift reflects Trump’s vision of a streamlined and mission-focused military, unencumbered by distractions that critics say have diluted its priorities in recent years.

Notably, there are key exceptions to the social media freeze.

The policy permits Defense Department components to continue posting about U.S. military efforts to secure the southern border, a cornerstone of Trump’s America First agenda.

The memo underscores the importance of this effort, noting that “this is top priority for the department.”

Routine updates related to the daily operations of military bases and installations are also exempt from the restrictions, ensuring transparency on essential matters.

The announcement coincided with the Senate’s narrow confirmation of former Fox News host Pete Hegseth as the next Secretary of Defense.

Hegseth, a vocal supporter of President Trump’s military reforms, is expected to help implement the administration’s vision for restoring discipline, strength, and focus to America’s armed forces.

The memo outlining the social media changes was signed by Defense Department Chief of Staff Joe Kasper.

This latest move is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to distance the military from left-leaning initiatives, including diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.

Critics of DEI policies argue that such initiatives have weakened the military’s emphasis on merit, readiness, and operational effectiveness.

The Pentagon’s decision to restrict messaging on social media aligns with Trump’s broader push to eliminate distractions and ensure the military remains apolitical and focused on its mission.

Posts promoting DEI-related themes or other politically charged content have come under scrutiny in recent months as the administration works to recalibrate the military’s priorities.

By emphasizing topics such as border security and operational readiness, the Pentagon is signaling a clear commitment to advancing policies that put the safety and security of Americans first.

Officials have confirmed that additional guidance regarding social media engagement will be shared early next month. This pause in activity is seen as an opportunity for the military to reassess its communication strategy and ensure it reflects the president’s vision of a stronger, more focused defense apparatus.

With this recalibration, the Trump administration is doubling down on its promise to restore the military’s standing as a lethal, disciplined, and apolitical force dedicated solely to defending the nation and its values.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Swamp is panicking like never before. They know Trump is back with a vengeance.

And the Department of Education is shredding documents after Trump made this one order.

The Department of Education took decisive action Thursday to eliminate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, shutting down controversial training programs and placing DEI administrators on paid leave.

In a statement, the department explained: “These actions are in line with President Trump’s ongoing commitment to end illegal discrimination and wasteful spending across the federal government.

They are the first step in reorienting the agency toward prioritizing meaningful learning ahead of divisive ideology in our schools.”

This announcement comes just days after President Trump issued an executive order declaring DEI policies “illegal” and warning they “threaten the safety of American men, women, and children across the Nation by diminishing the importance of individual merit, aptitude, hard work, and determination when selecting people for jobs and services in key sectors of American society.”

The executive order also mandates federal agencies to “combat illegal private-sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities.”

In line with these directives, the Department of Education disbanded the Diversity & Inclusion Council, originally established under President Barack Obama, along with two other DEI-related entities.

The department also canceled DEI training programs and service contracts worth more than $2.6 million and rescinded the controversial “Equity of Action Plan.”

Additionally, more than 200 web pages promoting DEI resources and encouraging schools and higher education institutions to adopt divisive ideological programs have been removed, according to the department’s press release.

The move sparked mixed reactions. Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees National, criticized Trump’s executive order, claiming it undermines federal hiring practices.

“Undoing these [DEI] programs is just another way for President Trump to undermine the merit-based civil service and turn federal hiring and firing decisions into loyalty tests,” Kelley stated. He also echoed concerns from military leaders who have suggested that eliminating DEI programs within the Defense Department could harm military readiness.

On the other hand, critics of DEI welcomed the move, describing such initiatives as immoral and divisive.

David Burton, senior fellow in economic policy at the Thomas A. Roe Institute, wrote in December, “Morally, DEI represents a marked step backwards. It is rejection of the principle that people should be judged on the content of their character and their individual achievement rather than their s*x, race, national origin, ethnicity, or s*xual orientation.”

Tim Walberg, Chairman of the Education and Workforce Committee and a Republican from Michigan, expressed a similar view last week.

“Instead of merit, skills, and ability,” Walberg said, “DEI devotees pushed policies that are antithetical to American exceptionalism.”

Walberg further added:

“From the classroom to the boardroom, Americans have felt the negative effects. DEI has bloated education budgets while telling students what to think instead of how to think.”

The Department of Education’s move marks a significant step in dismantling DEI policies that critics argue have prioritized ideological conformity over individual achievement and merit.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Former Vice President Harris is busy licking her wounds. Now she can’t believe her eyes.

And Kamala Harris is furious after this incriminating report about her dropped.

Kamala Harris wasted no time fleeing Washington, D.C., after grimacing her way through Donald Trump’s inauguration, clad in what resembled a black funeral suit. By the next day, she was back in her native California, far from the political theater she had just exited.

Back in the sunny confines of La-La Land, the now-jobless former vice president has time to process what is arguably the most humiliating loss of her career. For someone whose political trajectory seemed unstoppable, this defeat has sent shockwaves through her carefully curated image.

As Harris likely stews over her fall from grace, it’s hard to imagine her not pointing fingers. Former President Joe Biden, accused of dropping out of the race too late, is one target. Donald Trump’s relentless attacks are another. Even her husband, Doug Emhoff, whose murky past brought embarrassing headlines, might not escape the blame.

Harris’ campaign, described by critics as elitist and out of touch, fell flat with voters. Celebrity-packed concerts, vague messaging, and endless word salads alienated her audience. Yet Harris seemed oblivious to these glaring issues, and her inner circle only recognized the campaign’s failings when it was far too late.

One insider told *The Post* that Harris and her team never prepared for the possibility of losing. “Even up until 6, 7 p.m. on election night, they felt very confident she would become president,” the source revealed.

Despite Harris retreating to the West Coast, her allies remain detached from political reality. Many refuse to acknowledge that her devastating loss has all but crushed her chances of running again. “If she wants to be president, she will start her campaign next year. She’s well positioned to run again,” insisted one source, echoing the wishful thinking that plagued her campaign.

Meanwhile, in Washington, D.C., the postmortem is far less forgiving. “She is done in D.C. and quite frankly was the worst major candidate of either party since Michael Dukakis,” a senior Democratic congressional source said bluntly.

Another insider painted a similar picture: “She was a mid vice president. No big screwups, but not a shining star. I think we need to move past Kamala Harris to a new generation of leaders in the Democratic Party.”

Harris’ meteoric rise from Oakland prosecutor to vice president has hit a brick wall. Her career, once buoyed by powerful connections like former lover and Democratic kingmaker Willie Brown, is now in uncharted territory. Reports suggest she’s weighing a gubernatorial run in 2026 or another presidential bid in 2028.

Adding to the bizarre optics, Harris has reportedly turned to Hillary Clinton for advice—an ironic move, given Clinton’s own humiliating defeat to Trump in 2016. The two have spoken multiple times since Harris’ loss, according to *New York Magazine*.

Harris still has loyalists spinning her potential future. One congressional source quipped, “Harris could break one glass ceiling and do the near-impossible of turning California red if she chooses to run for governor in 2028.” Yet the field for governor is already crowded with credible candidates unburdened by a national-scale loss.

“There are about five credible candidates for California governor right now, including Rick Caruso,” said a former Los Angeles district attorney. “Los Angeles is full of virtue signalers, but a lot of them may be having second thoughts about [ultra-progressive] politicians like Harris, given the wildfires.”

Since her loss, Harris has largely kept a low profile, emerging briefly to console wildfire victims in Southern California. Her Brentwood mansion was even threatened by the blazes. But any goodwill from these appearances was undercut by the optics of Gov. Gavin Newsom swooping in to grab the spotlight. Newsom, who is widely expected to run for president in 2028, used the fires as a backdrop to launch his unofficial campaign—though not without gaffes, such as pretending to be on the phone with Biden to dodge an irate resident.

Harris’ personal life has also taken a hit. Rumors about her marriage to Doug Emhoff have intensified since the election. While Emhoff has denied assault allegations against his ex-girlfriend, he hasn’t addressed claims of an affair with his children’s former nanny, Najen Naylor. His past indiscretions have done little to bolster Harris’ already shaky public image.

The fallout from Harris’ return to California has been palpable. Even her neighbors aren’t thrilled. “I’m embarrassed that she lives here, and I’m embarrassed that she represented the United States,” one Brentwood resident told *The Post*. “Karen Bass, Gavin Newsom—they’ve destroyed my state. Kamala Harris will do exactly the same. I’d rather she find another state to destroy.”

Harris, who once championed “joy” on the campaign trail, may now need to embrace a quieter existence. After spending time vacationing in Hawaii and hosting holiday parties post-election, her public appearances have dwindled. One former associate didn’t mince words: “She’s a fake and a fraud. Retire for God’s sake. Let some other people take a stab at life.”

As Harris’ star dims, one harsh suggestion seems to resonate: a move to Montecito to join the likes of Meghan Markle—another once-promising figure whose relevance has waned.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Biden oversaw the tanking of the United States economy. All of that could be turning around.

And now the Federal Reserve is in an uproar over this White House announcement.

President Trump didn’t hold back on Thursday when discussing his views on interest rates, making it clear that he wants them to drop significantly—and he expects the Federal Reserve to follow his lead.

“I’d like to see them come down a lot and oil prices will come down,” Mr. Trump said after signing a series of executive orders. He argued that lower energy prices would lead to broad economic benefits.

“And when oil prices come down, everything’s going to be cheaper for the American people, and actually for the world, but for the American people.”

Trump explained the connection between energy costs and inflation, stating, “When the energy comes down, that’s going to knock out a lot of the inflation. That’s going to automatically bring the interest rates down.”

Earlier in the day, during virtual remarks to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Mr. Trump doubled down on his stance. He told the audience he would “demand interest rates drop immediately.”

When a reporter pressed him on whether he expected the Federal Reserve to heed his call, Trump responded confidently.

“Yeah,” he said, adding that he would meet with Fed Chairman Jerome Powell “at the right time.”

The president didn’t shy away from criticizing the Federal Reserve, implying he had a better grasp of the issue than those in charge.

“I know interest rates much better than they do, and I think I know it certainly much better than the one who’s primarily in charge of making that decision,” he remarked.

The Federal Reserve is set to announce its decision on interest rates next week, with current rates hovering between 4.25% and 4.5%.

While most analysts expect the central bank to hold rates steady, Trump’s comments have added fuel to the ongoing debate about monetary policy.

This isn’t the first time Mr. Trump has taken aim at the Fed. During his first term, he frequently pressured Powell, both publicly and privately, to lower interest rates.

Despite his efforts, the Fed resisted many of his demands.

Still, the president signaled he’s willing to continue making his views known.

“I am guided by the Federal Reserve,” Trump said, before adding a caveat. “But if I disagree, I will let it be known.”

With the Fed’s decision looming, Trump’s remarks are sure to keep the spotlight on the central bank and its next move.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Everyone’s secrets are coming out now. And the Left is not happy about it.

Because a former Clinton adviser came out with a shocking revelation that is dropping jaws.

Veteran Democrat strategist James Carville didn’t hold back during a recent episode of the “Politics War Room” podcast.

Speaking with cohost Al Hunt, Carville delivered a blunt assessment of former President Joe Biden, urging him to retire quietly to his home in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, and avoid the public spotlight.

“What he’s done to himself is no one wants to hear from this guy anymore,” Carville said, expressing the frustration many within the Democratic Party reportedly feel.

“Okay, just go to your condo in Rehoboth and stay there. And that’s not because we’re bad people or we’re mean people. It was all his doing. All his doing, this entire thing.”

Carville, who has been outspoken about the Democratic Party’s embrace of “woke” ideology, placed the blame squarely on Biden’s shoulders.

According to Carville, not only have voters lost interest in Biden, but even his own party seems uninterested in hearing from him anymore.

The veteran strategist also took aim at Biden’s repeated claim that he could have beaten Donald Trump in November had he stayed in the race.

Carville didn’t mince words, dismissing the assertion entirely. “No one f***ing believes that at all!” he declared.

Carville also touched on reported tensions between Biden and others in his circle, including First Lady Jill Biden and filmmaker Alexandra Pelosi.

“I mean, just look, guy — you had a noble career. Your last act was terrible. Just get out of the way,” Carville said.

“The party’s moving on. I mean, they’re really moving on, and it’s very sad, but that’s just where we are. And he created this himself. He has nobody to blame but himself. Nobody.”

Hunt chimed in, agreeing that Biden no longer has a role in the national conversation.

He suggested that Biden might find a better use of his time by stepping away from politics altogether and focusing on raising funds for a presidential library.

Carville went even further, warning that if Biden insisted on maintaining a public presence in politics, it would only hurt him and the party.

“If he keeps this up, it’s not going to help anyone,” Carville said, making it clear that Biden’s continued involvement would likely be viewed as more of a liability than an asset.

For a strategist like Carville, who has spent decades shaping Democratic campaigns, the message was both sharp and unmistakable: the party is ready to move forward, and Biden is no longer the figure to lead them.

Wow, James Carville did not hold back on Joe Biden: "What he's done to himself is no one wants to hear from this guy anymore. Just go to your condo in Rehoboth and stay there."

"Your last act was terrible. Just get out of the way. The party's moving on."@DailyCaller pic.twitter.com/CajCL7xPhO

— Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 (@JasonJournoDC) January 23, 2025

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Sometimes it’s hard to believe the Left has a conscience. What they’re willing to do goes far beyond the pale.

And now Senate Democrats sunk a bill in Congress for one horrifying reason.

Senate Democrats on Jan. 22 blocked the advancement of the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, effectively halting Republican efforts to require medical care for infants born alive during failed abortion attempts.

The proposed legislation, introduced on Jan. 16 by Republican Sens. John Kennedy (La.), James Lankford (Okla.), and Jim Banks (Ind.), with 39 additional GOP co-sponsors, would have mandated that health care providers deliver the same level of care to infants born alive after an abortion as they would to any other baby of the same gestational age, CatholicVote reported.

Despite a Republican majority in the Senate, the bill failed to reach the 60 votes needed to advance, falling short at 52-47, The Hill reported.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) had anticipated the uphill battle, citing staunch Democratic opposition to the measure.

“[Democratic senators] will vote against protection for a living, breathing newborn baby simply because that child has been born alive after an attempted abortion,” Thune said.

A baby born alive after an attempted abortion should be entitled to the same protection and medical care that any other newborn baby is entitled to.

This shouldn’t be a controversial bill. pic.twitter.com/tq2wqpNpeC

— Leader John Thune (@LeaderJohnThune) January 22, 2025

“Democrats are afraid that by recognizing the humanity of the newly-born child, they will inadvertently point to the humanity of the unborn child.”

The bill included provisions requiring health care workers to report instances where born-alive infants did not receive proper care to law enforcement.

Additionally, it mandated that abortion survivors be transported to a hospital for further medical treatment.

Thune underscored the moral implications of the legislation, saying, “Once you recognize the humanity of the newly-born baby, it gets a little harder to say that that child wasn’t human just a few moments ago, simply because he or she wasn’t yet born.”

Democrats, however, dismissed the bill as unnecessary, claiming federal laws already prohibit infanticide. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) went so far as to call the legislation “pernicious.”

“The Republican so-called ‘born-alive’ bill is pernicious as they come,” Schumer said, accusing Republicans of pushing “false narratives and outright fearmongering” in what he claimed was an attempt to “attack women’s health care.”

He also argued the bill would create undue legal risks for doctors.

The vote came on the 52nd anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the controversial Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide and was overturned in 2022.

This week, thousands of pro-life advocates have gathered in Washington, D.C., for the annual March for Life, underscoring the ongoing divide on abortion policy in America.

Although Democrats succeeded in blocking the legislation, Republicans’ push for the bill highlights their ongoing commitment to defending the rights of vulnerable newborns—a stark contrast to Democratic rhetoric, which critics argue prioritizes political ideology over protecting life.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Donald Trump almost lost his life twice. Someone needs to answer for it.

And now the Secret Service was just rattled by a shocking announcement from President Trump.

President Donald Trump has officially nominated Sean Curran, the head of his personal Security Service detail, to lead the United States Secret Service moving forward.

The nomination was announced in a post on Wednesday evening, marking a significant milestone for Curran, who gained national attention for his heroic actions during the assassination attempt on Trump last July in Butler, Pennsylvania.

“It is my great honor to appoint Sean Curran as the next Director of the United States Secret Service,” Trump said in a statement.

“Sean is a Great Patriot, who has protected my family over the past few years, and that is why I trust him to lead the Brave Men and Women of the United States Secret Service.”

The president lauded Curran’s leadership skills and bravery, highlighting his track record of managing complex security operations.

“Sean has distinguished himself as a brilliant leader, who is capable of directing and leading operational security plans for some of the most complex Special Security Events in the History of our Country, and the World,” Trump continued.

Trump also praised Curran for his heroism during the Butler incident, saying, “He proved his fearless courage when he risked his own life to help save mine from an assassin’s bullet.

I have complete and total confidence in Sean to make the United States Secret Service stronger than ever before.”

Curran brings over 20 years of law enforcement experience to the role.

He began his career as a Special Agent in the Newark Secret Service Field Office in 2001, where he was involved in a variety of high-stakes operations.

During Trump’s first term, Curran served as the Assistant Special Agent in Charge of the Presidential Protective Division.

In this capacity, he had “direct oversight and responsibility of multiple protectees, and enhanced security plans for my residences,” Trump said.

The nomination didn’t come as a complete surprise.

Donald Trump Jr. hinted at the decision in a social media post last week, where he called Curran a “great patriot” who would “stop all the insanity once and for all.”

“There’s not a better person to be in this position!” Trump Jr. added, underscoring the widespread support for Curran within Trump’s inner circle.

As the nomination moves forward, Curran is poised to take on one of the most critical security roles in the nation, tasked with safeguarding the lives of U.S. leaders and upholding the agency’s storied legacy.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Republicans are wasting no time accomplishing Trump’s agenda. And the Left can’t take it anymore.

Now the Senate floor erupted in chaos after Republicans went on the offensive.

Leading Senate Republicans are turning up the heat on Democrats for delaying the confirmation process for President Donald Trump’s Cabinet nominees during his second term.

The fiery clash underscores the deep partisan divide over Trump’s leadership team.

The latest flashpoint came on Tuesday when Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) objected to a time agreement that would have expedited a final vote on John Ratcliffe’s nomination for CIA director.

This move prompted a sharp response from Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD), who took to the Senate floor to express his frustration.

“We’ve now wasted a whole day where we could have been acting on that nomination,” Thune said, emphasizing the urgency of the matter. He pressed his Democratic colleagues, asking, “Do we want a vote on these folks on Tuesday or vote on them on Friday, Saturday and Sunday? Because that’s what we’re going to do. This can be easy or this can be hard.”

Thune highlighted Ratcliffe’s strong bipartisan support, noting that the former House Republican from Texas had sailed through the Senate Intelligence Committee with a 14-3 vote. “This is about America’s national security interests. And we’re stalling,” he said.

Determined to press forward, Thune outlined the path ahead. “We’re going to file cloture on them. You can force us to stay here… Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. But we’re going to vote on them,” he declared.

As I’ve repeatedly said, Senate Republicans are ready to work as long as needed to confirm President Trump’s nominees. Nights. Weekends. Recesses. pic.twitter.com/yLl2hIo0pc

— Leader John Thune (@LeaderJohnThune) January 22, 2025

The delays aren’t limited to Ratcliffe. Thune also initiated procedural steps to advance confirmation votes for South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, nominated for Homeland Security secretary, and Pete Hegseth, nominated for Defense secretary. Both nominees have already cleared committee votes.

Thune’s resolve was further underscored in a post to X, where he suggested that recess appointments could be on the table—a tactic Trump has openly supported to bypass Senate delays.

Democrats defended their actions, with Murphy insisting on a “full” debate over Ratcliffe’s nomination, citing “serious concerns” about whether the nominee could “distance himself from the political interests of President Trump.”

However, Senate Intelligence Chairman Tom Cotton (R-AR) dismissed these claims, accusing Democrats of playing procedural games to block Trump’s nominees.

“What this is really about is trying to drag out all of these nominations… to try to deny President Trump his Cabinet in a prompt and timely fashion,” Cotton said.

My message to obstructionist Democrats:

Don’t make plans this weekend. We’re going to get President Trump’s nominees confirmed the easy collegial way, or apparently the hard way. pic.twitter.com/DJrA09bTqk

— Tom Cotton (@SenTomCotton) January 21, 2025

The Senate has so far confirmed only one of Trump’s Cabinet nominees: former Senator Marco Rubio, who was unanimously approved as U.S. Secretary of State and sworn in on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, additional delays loom. The Senate Judiciary Committee announced that Democrats had exercised their right to push back a vote on advancing Pam Bondi’s nomination for U.S. attorney general by another week.

As the standoff continues, Republicans remain determined to see Trump’s team confirmed, while Democrats insist on a slower process, citing the need for thorough debate.

The battle highlights the contentious nature of Washington’s partisan politics, even over critical national security and administrative roles.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Donald Trump is sparing no time going after the Left. And now they have nowhere to hide.

And Trump eviscerated one liberal for a disgusting act caught on camera.

President Donald Trump didn’t hold back his criticism of the “nasty” Episcopal bishop who lectured him during the National Prayer Service, accusing her of turning a religious gathering into a political stage.

The sharp rebuke came after Trump endured a Tuesday service led by Rev. Mariann Edgar Budde, the Episcopal bishop of Washington, DC. Budde’s sermon focused heavily on illegal migrants, refugees, and LGBT issues, a move that many saw as a direct political statement.

“The so-called Bishop who spoke at the National Prayer Service on Tuesday morning was a Radical Left hardline Trump hater,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social account shortly after midnight.

“She brought her church into the World of politics in a very ungracious way,” he continued, describing her tone as “nasty” and lacking in intelligence or persuasiveness.

Trump took particular issue with Budde’s plea for “mercy” toward immigrant families, especially children who fear being separated from their parents.

“She failed to mention the large number of illegal migrants that came into our Country and killed people,” Trump wrote.

“Many were deposited from jails and mental institutions. It is a giant crime wave that is taking place in the USA.”

The former president didn’t stop there. He criticized the overall atmosphere of the service, calling it “very boring and uninspiring.”

“As well as her inappropriate statements, the service was a very boring and uninspiring one,”

Trump wrote, adding, “She is not very good at her job! She and her church owe the public an apology!”

Rev. Budde, who also spoke passionately about “gay, lesbian, and transgender children” fearing for their safety, admitted later that her words were intended as a direct message to Trump.

“I was looking at the president because I was speaking to him,” Budde told CNN.

“I was speaking to the president because I felt he has this moment now where he feels charged and empowered to do what he feels called to do, and I wanted to say there is room for mercy.”

She further explained her intentions, saying she aimed to “counter, as gently as I could, with a reminder of [illegal migrants’] humanity and their place in our wider community.”

Budde insisted she wanted to “have these conversations in a respectful way.”

While Budde defended her remarks as compassionate and measured, Trump’s response made clear he saw her comments as a blatant political attack disguised as a sermon.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Real leadership is back in office. And our those who wish us harm should be worried.

Now this foreign enemy is cowering in fear over a threat from Donald Trump.

Russia’s foreign ministry has urged President Donald Trump to uphold the international agreement governing the Panama Canal, emphasizing that its control should remain with Panama.

Alexander Shchetinin, head of the ministry’s Latin American department, told Russian news outlet TASS that he expects Trump “will respect the current international legal regime” established by the 1977 treaties between the U.S. and Panama.

These agreements ended U.S. control of the canal by 2000 and guaranteed its neutrality under international law.

However, Trump has taken aim at Panama since his decisive election victory in November, accusing the country of allowing China to dominate the vital trade route while leaving American ships at a disadvantage. Trump claimed U.S. vessels were being “ripped off.”

During his inaugural address on Monday, Trump made his position clear, vowing that the U.S. would be “taking it back.”

Shchetinin weighed in on the escalating rhetoric, stating, “We expect that during the expected discussions between the leadership of Panama and President Trump on issues of control over the Panama Canal, which certainly falls within the sphere of their bilateral relations, the parties will respect the current international legal regime of this key waterway.”

He highlighted that over 40 nations, including Russia, signed a protocol agreement recognizing the canal’s neutrality and ensuring its safety and openness.

“[The U.S. and Panama] must protect the canal from any threat to the neutrality regime,” Shchetinin said.

He further noted, “A reservation was made that the said right of the United States to defend the Panama Canal does not mean and should not be interpreted as the right to interfere in the internal affairs of Panama, and any actions by the American side will never be directed against the territorial integrity or political independence of Panama.”

Trump has repeatedly criticized the agreement, calling it a “big mistake” made by former President Jimmy Carter.

“The United States… spent more money than was ever spent on a project before and lost 38,000 lives in the building of the Panama Canal,” Trump said during his inaugural address.

“We have been treated very badly from this foolish gift that should never have been made. And Panama’s promise to us has been broken. The purpose of our deal and the spirit of our treaty has been totally violated.”

Trump didn’t hold back, saying, “American ships are being severely overcharged and not treated fairly in any way, shape or form, and that includes the United States Navy. And above all, China is operating the Panama Canal. And we didn’t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we’re taking it back.”

Panama Canal administrator Ricaurte Vásquez refuted these claims earlier this month, asserting that China does not control the canal and that all nations are treated equally under its neutrality treaty.

The 51-mile waterway, constructed by the United States in the early 20th century, links the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, saving ships a 7,000-mile journey around South America’s Cape Horn. It remains a critical maritime trade route.

Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino responded firmly to Trump’s remarks, declaring, “The Canal is and will continue to be Panama’s and its administration will continue to be under Panamanian control with respect to its permanent neutrality.”

“There is no presence of any nation in the world that interferes with our administration,” Mulino continued, rejecting Trump’s suggestion that the U.S. “gave” the canal to Panama.

“Dialogue is always the way to clarify the points mentioned without undermining our right, total sovereignty, and ownership of our Canal,” Mulino concluded.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.