The Democrats can’t get their footing. They keep getting hit upside the head by reality.

And now the U.S. Supreme Court has smacked the Democrat party with a devastating loss in dramatic fashion.

Supreme Court Upholds Trump Admin’s Tough Immigration Stance

In a decisive move that strengthens the Trump administration’s commitment to enforcing immigration laws, Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan on Wednesday rejected an emergency appeal from four Mexican nationals facing deportation. The petitioners, a family from Guerrero, Mexico, sought to block their removal, claiming they faced threats from the Los Rojos drug cartel. Kagan’s swift denial of their request without comment sends a clear message: the United States will not waver in upholding its sovereignty and protecting its borders.

The family—Fabian Lagunas Espinoza, Maria Angelica Flores Ulloa, and their two sons—was ordered to report to immigration officials on Thursday. Their legal team argued that returning to Mexico would expose them to cartel violence, citing a 2021 incident where cartel members demanded they abandon their home within 24 hours or face death. Despite these claims, Kagan, acting as the justice overseeing the Ninth Circuit, dismissed the appeal without referring it to the full court, reinforcing the administration’s stance that immigration laws must be enforced consistently.

The Trump administration has long prioritized border security, emphasizing that illegal entry into the United States cannot be rewarded with leniency. The family’s asylum claims were rejected by an immigration judge, a decision upheld by the Board of Immigration Appeals in November 2023 and later affirmed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in February 2025. A temporary stay of removal was lifted on April 7, paving the way for their deportation. This chain of rulings demonstrates the judiciary’s alignment with the administration’s firm immigration policies.

According to the family’s court filing, they fled Mexico after enduring threats from the Los Rojos cartel, which also targeted extended family members with beatings and intimidation for refusing to comply with extortion demands. While these details paint a grim picture, the Trump administration argues that the U.S. cannot serve as a sanctuary for every individual facing hardship abroad. The government’s position is clear: lawful processes must govern immigration, and those who enter illegally must face the consequences.

The petitioners’ attorney, LeRoy George Siddell, argued in the filing, “Petitioners face imminent removal and have been directed to report to immigration office on 4/17/2025, despite credible and detailed testimony and documentary evidence showing they are targets of cartel violence due to their family ties and refusal to comply with extortion demands.” Yet, the administration contends that such claims, while serious, do not automatically grant the right to remain in the U.S. The immigration system, under Trump’s leadership, prioritizes national security and the rule of law over emotional appeals.

Liberal Justice Kagan Breaks From The Left To Give Trump Major Win

Kagan’s decision to act alone, without involving her colleagues, just goes to show the strength of the legal framework supporting the administration’s policies. As the justice assigned to handle emergency appeals from the Ninth Circuit, she had the authority to make a unilateral ruling. Her choice to do so without further deliberation signals confidence in the lower courts’ rulings and the immigration authorities’ processes. This move aligns with the Trump administration’s push for a judiciary that respects the executive branch’s authority on immigration matters.

The Department of Justice, which did not respond to the application before Kagan’s ruling, has consistently supported the administration’s efforts to streamline deportations and deter illegal immigration. The DOJ’s silence in this case speaks volumes, suggesting that the government views the matter as a straightforward application of existing law. The Trump administration has worked to restore order to an immigration system it views as previously plagued by loopholes and leniency, and Kagan’s ruling advances that mission.

As of Thursday morning, the family was required to report to U.S. immigration authorities, with their fate hanging in the balance. The Trump administration’s supporters see this as a necessary step in maintaining the integrity of the nation’s borders. Critics may argue that the decision lacks compassion, but the administration counters that compassion cannot come at the expense of law and order. The U.S. immigration system, under Trump’s guidance, is designed to protect American citizens first while ensuring that legal pathways to entry are respected.

This case is emblematic of the broader immigration challenges the Trump administration has tackled since taking office. From strengthening border enforcement to reforming asylum policies, the administration has sought to create a system that deters illegal crossings and prioritizes those who follow legal processes. Kagan’s ruling is a victory for those who believe that immigration laws must be enforced without exception, reinforcing the administration’s commitment to its America First agenda.

In the eyes of the Trump administration and its supporters, Justice Kagan’s decision is a step toward reclaiming control over the nation’s borders and ensuring that the United States remains a nation of laws. As the administration continues to push for stricter immigration measures, this ruling serves as a reminder that the judiciary plays a critical role in upholding the will of the American people. The fight for secure borders and lawful immigration, as championed by President Trump, moves forward with unwavering resolve.

Prudent Politics will bring you any further updates in major immigration litigation.

Politicians thrive on public opinion. But when it turns against them, it’s over.

Now an unsettling photo of this Democrat Senator could completely destroy his career.

High-Stakes Diplomatic Encounter in El Salvador

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) finally met with Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an undocumented immigrant deported from the U.S. to a mega-prison in El Salvador, after persistent efforts to verify his well-being.

The meeting, which took place on Thursday, was publicized by El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, who shared images of Van Hollen, Abrego Garcia, and another individual conversing over drinks.

In a sarcastic post on X, Bukele mocked claims of Abrego Garcia’s mistreatment, stating, “Kilmar Abrego Garcia, miraculously risen from the ‘death camps’ & ‘torture’, now sipping margaritas with Sen. Van Hollen in the tropical paradise of El Salvador!” Van Hollen shared his own photo of the encounter, confirming the meeting and noting, “I said my main goal of this trip was to meet with Kilmar.

Tonight I had that chance. I have called his wife, Jennifer, to pass along his message of love. I look forward to providing a full update upon my return.”

Tensions Over Deportation and Due Process

Van Hollen’s trip to El Salvador earlier this week was driven by his determination to check on Abrego Garcia, whom he described as a “constituent” subjected to an “abduction and unlawful deportation.”

The 29-year-old, who had been living in Maryland after receiving permission to stay in the U.S. in 2019, was deported last month amid the Trump administration’s intensified immigration crackdown. Van Hollen faced obstacles, including a denied request to visit Abrego Garcia and being blocked by soldiers at the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT).

Undeterred, he vowed to “keep at this” to ensure Abrego Garcia’s “rights to due process.”

The case has sparked a legal battle, with a recent Supreme Court ruling mandating that the government “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s return, though not necessarily ensure it.

A U.S. appeals court panel reinforced this, stating, “The government asserts that Abrego Garcia is a terrorist and a member of MS-13. Perhaps, but perhaps not. Regardless, he is still entitled to due process.”

Allegations and International Standoff

The Trump administration has labeled Abrego Garcia a member of the MS-13 gang, designated as a foreign terror organization, and released documents to support this claim, though his attorneys deny the affiliation.

The deportation, initially called an “administrative error” in court, was later attributed by White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller to a “saboteur” in the Justice Department.

Further scrutiny revealed a restraining order accusing Abrego Garcia of domestic violence against his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, though she now says they resolved the issue. During a White House meeting, Bukele firmly rejected calls to return Abrego Garcia, declaring, “How can I smuggle a terrorist into the United States?” and adding, “I don’t have the power to return him.”

After the Van Hollen meeting, Bukele posted on X, “Now that he’s been confirmed healthy, he gets the honor of staying in El Salvador’s custody,” signaling an ongoing international impasse.

The assault on our rights by the government has been almost too much to bear. Now a decision has finally been made.

Because a federal judge made a landmark ruling that changes the First Amendment for good.

Victory for Religious Freedom in North Dakota Ruling

In a landmark decision, a federal judge in North Dakota has delivered a resounding rebuke to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), shielding Catholic employers from Biden-era mandates that clashed with their faith.

The ruling, issued by Judge Daniel M. Traynor, halts the EEOC’s efforts to force Catholic organizations to comply with regulations under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act that would require accommodating abortion, in vitro fertilization (IVF), and surrogacy. It also blocks enforcement of controversial LGBT “anti-discrimination” rules, including pronoun mandates and access to single-s*x spaces.

The lawsuit, brought by the Diocese of Bismarck and the Catholic Benefits Association (CBA), challenged the EEOC’s overreach as a direct violation of religious liberty.

“The US District Court for the District of North Dakota entered judgment Wednesday,” Bloomberg Law reported, noting Traynor’s finding that the EEOC’s rules “would cause the Catholic Benefits Association and the Bismarck Diocese to violate their ‘sincerely held religious beliefs without satisfying strict scrutiny under the’ Religious Freedom Restoration Act.”

For Catholic groups, the decision is a critical safeguard against federal overreach that threatened their core values.

Catholic Employers Celebrate Protection of Faith-Based Mission

The Catholic Benefits Association, representing over 9,000 members, hailed the ruling as a decisive triumph. “The court granted permanent protection from the EEOC’s efforts to force Catholic employers and others to accommodate abortion, IVF, or surrogacy, and to eliminate single-s*x spaces and adopt preferred pronouns,” the CBA declared in a Wednesday press release.

The decision ensures that Catholic ministries can continue their work without being coerced into practices that contradict their beliefs.

Doug Wilson, CEO of CBA, underscored the significance of the victory, pointing to the group’s persistent legal battles against government overreach. “The fact that we have had to sue the government five times and won every single time clearly illustrates both the strength of our legal strategy and the misguided ideological nature of the efforts to undermine our faith-driven ministries,” Wilson said.

He emphasized that the ruling empowers CBA members to pursue their mission unhindered. “Guided by their Catholic faith, our members contribute innumerable hours and resources in service to society every year, out of love for Jesus Christ and our fellow man,” he added. “This ruling lets us continue to serve without the threat of the EEOC persecuting us for following our faith.”

Free Speech and Pro-Life Values Upheld

The ruling also delivers a significant win for free speech, striking down EEOC guidance that sought to regulate workplace speech and behavior. “Going beyond the medical procedure aspects of the case, yesterday’s permanent injunction also addressed the speech aspects of the Enforcement Guidance that the EEOC issued on hostile work environments,” the CBA stated.

The court ruled that Catholic employers cannot be compelled to “refrain from speaking or communicating against the same [immoral matters] when such is contrary to the Catholic faith, use pronouns inconsistent with a person’s biological s*x; or allow persons to use private spaces reserved for the opposite s*x.” This protection ensures that Catholic organizations can maintain their commitment to both free expression and their doctrinal stance.

The CBA highlighted the irony of the EEOC’s interpretation of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, which was initially supported by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops for its pro-worker and pro-life intent.

“The US Conference of Catholic Bishops supported the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act as it made its way through Congress because it was ‘pro-worker, pro-family and pro-life,’ according to a statement from Bishop Michael Burbidge,” the CBA noted. However, the EEOC’s rules “turned its intentions on its head by including accommodation for abortion and the other immoral aspects that CBA sued over,” transforming a well-meaning law into a tool for ideological enforcement.

A Stand Against Federal Overreach

The ruling marks a broader pushback against federal agencies accused of imposing progressive mandates at the expense of religious liberty. For the Diocese of Bismarck and the CBA, the lawsuit was a necessary stand to protect their ability to operate in alignment with Catholic teachings.

The court’s decision reinforces the principle that religious organizations cannot be forced to abandon their beliefs to comply with government edicts that fail to meet the stringent requirements of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

As Catholic employers breathe a sigh of relief, the ruling serves as a reminder of the ongoing tension between faith-based organizations and federal policies that critics argue prioritize ideology over constitutional protections. For now, the CBA and its members can continue their charitable work, confident that their religious convictions are shielded from what they see as bureaucratic overreach.

Americans around the country don’t have any great love for the IRS. Now the agency is feeling the brunt of it.

And they are shredding documents after a Republican introduced this consequential bill.

House Republicans Challenge IRS Overreach with Bold Firearm Ban

As millions of Americans begrudgingly navigate the annual tax-filing ordeal, a group of House Republicans is taking aim at the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) bloated power, proposing a bill to strip the agency of its firearms and ammunition.

The move signals growing frustration with an agency critics say has grown too comfortable flexing muscle against hardworking taxpayers.

The “Why Does the IRS Need Guns Act,” spearheaded by Rep. Barry Moore, R-Ala., would slam the brakes on the IRS’s ability to purchase, store, or receive guns and ammo.

Instead, the agency’s existing stockpile would be handed over to the Administrator of General Services for public auction. Firearms would go to licensed dealers, while ammunition would be sold directly to citizens.

Every penny from these sales, the bill mandates, would flow into “the general fund of the Treasury for the sole purpose of deficit reduction.”

Moore, joined by Reps. Harriet Hageman of Wyoming, Mary Miller of Illinois, and Clay Higgins of Louisiana, argues the IRS has no business wielding weapons while squeezing Americans for their earnings.

“The IRS has consistently been weaponized against American citizens, targeted religious organizations, journalists, gun owners, and everyday Americans,” Moore asserted, according to a press release. “Arming these agents does not make the American public safer. My legislation, the Why Does the IRS Need Guns Act, would disarm these agents, auction off their guns to Federal Firearms License Owners, and sell their ammunition to the public. The only thing IRS agents should be armed with are calculators.”

Shifting IRS Enforcement to the Justice Department

Beyond disarming the IRS, the bill takes a scalpel to the agency’s enforcement arm. It transfers the Criminal Investigation Division—along with its personnel, assets, and authority—to the Department of Justice, where it would operate as a distinct unit within the Criminal Division.

This move, proponents say, would curb the IRS’s ability to act as judge, jury, and tax collector, reining in what many see as unchecked power.

The IRS, for its part, claims its “mission is to provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and to enforce the law with integrity and fairness to all.”

Yet, critics like Moore argue this rhetoric masks a pattern of overreach, with armed agents intimidating citizens rather than serving them.

A Tax Day Call to Rein in IRS Excess

The proposal comes as taxpayers feel the sting of Tax Day, a yearly reminder of the IRS’s deep reach into their wallets. In an April 15 post on X, Moore drove the point home: “Tax Day is a great reminder that it’s time for the IRS to stop wasting our taxpayer dollars stockpiling guns and ammo.”

For many Americans fed up with bureaucratic bloat, the bill offers a chance to clip the wings of an agency they view as more bully than public servant.

The US border should never had gotten as bad as it was. But thanks to the Democrats, it did.

And now a Border Patrol official came clean about an uncomfortable truth.

Border Patrol Morale Soars Under New Leadership

U.S. Border Patrol Chief Mike Banks, speaking on Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom” on Wednesday, expressed unprecedented enthusiasm among agents, stating that morale is “going through the roof” under the Trump administration.

Banks, a former Border Patrol agent and Texas’ border czar since 2023, credited the shift to a renewed focus on law enforcement.

“We’ve had the handcuffs taken off,” he said, emphasizing that agents are now empowered to fulfill their core mission. “Under this administration, they have literally taken the handcuffs off and allowed us to enforce law instead of policies that were created to contradict the law and so our morale has continued to rise.”

This surge in morale follows a challenging period under the Biden administration, during which Banks noted a “mass exodus” from the agency due to restrictive policies.

The newfound optimism is also reflected in social media sentiment, with posts on X echoing Banks’ sentiments, noting agents reversing retirement plans due to improved conditions.

Dramatic Decline in Southern Border Apprehensions

A recent U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) report underscores the impact of Trump’s border policies, revealing that March 2025 saw fewer apprehensions along the southern border than the first two days of March 2024 under Biden.

Eagle Pass, Texas, once a hotspot with 3,000 to 4,000 daily apprehensions, now averages just 18 per day, with “very few gotaways, little to none. Some days zero gotaways,” Banks reported. This aligns with broader CBP data showing a 95% drop in apprehensions from 137,473 in March 2024 to 7,181 in March 2025.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt hailed the transformation, stating, “Thanks to President Trump’s leadership, Border Patrol agents are now back to doing the jobs they signed up for: securing the border, rather than serving as travel agents for illegal aliens.”

She cited a Los Angeles Times article highlighting the stark change, with its headline noting a “nearly empty” California-Mexico border and closed migrant shelters. These outcomes stem from Trump’s executive actions, including ending birthright citizenship, suspending refugee admissions, halting humanitarian parole apps, and resuming border wall construction.

Recruitment and Retention Rebound

Banks also highlighted a remarkable turnaround in Border Patrol recruitment and retention. “Recruiting is looking great,” he told Fox News, with the agency “seeing some of our highest numbers ever.” This contrasts sharply with the Biden era, which saw record-low recruitment and high attrition.

“We’re seeing agents pull retirement paperwork in order to continue staying in and serve, and we’re seeing our recruiting numbers go through the roof,” Banks added, signaling a revitalized workforce eager to support the administration’s stringent border security measures.

The collaboration with Texas’ Operation Lone Star, where Banks previously served under Gov. Greg Abbott, has also bolstered efforts. The operation, which includes deploying Texas National Guard soldiers deputized by Banks to assist Border Patrol, has contributed to over 531,400 apprehensions and significant fentanyl seizures, further enhancing border security.

These developments paint a picture of a reinvigorated Border Patrol, aligned with Trump’s aggressive immigration agenda, though longer-term trends will determine the sustainability of these gains.

No one ever accused politicians of being the brightest. They let their ignorance shine through more often than not.

And now a top US Congresswoman is utterly embarrassed after making this idiotic claim on live TV.

AOC’s Rally Stirs Division Debate

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., took the stage at a “Fighting Oligarchy” rally in Idaho alongside Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., urging supporters not to fall for what she called Republican attempts to divide Americans by race and culture.

Her remarks, part of a nationwide tour, come as President Donald Trump pushes to eliminate identity politics from public and private sectors.

“The only chance they have to get away with such an unpopular and hurtful agenda is to stoke deep divisions along race, identity and culture to keep us fighting and distracted. It’s not going to work anymore,” AOC declared.

“Don’t let them trick us into thinking we are enemies. Don’t let them trick us into being weak and being into thinking we can be separated into rural and urban, black and white and Latino.”

The rally targeted “billionaire oligarchs,” including Trump, framing them as threats to working-class interests, despite Trump’s focus on policies aimed at unifying the nation through merit-based systems.

Trump’s Bold Anti-DEI Agenda

President Trump has made dismantling diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives a hallmark of his administration, arguing they foster division rather than unity. His executive actions target what he describes as harmful policies introduced by prior administrations.

“Prior to harmful changes introduced by the Obama and Biden administrations, the United States military offered equality of opportunity to every American capable of and interested in serving their country,” Trump stated in an early Executive Order. “Yet these two administrations exploited the military in favor of identity politics—harming our national defense, undermining the non-political nature of our military, and eroding morale and recruitment.”

Trump’s reforms extend to federal hiring, universities, and private businesses, aiming to root out what he calls discriminatory practices.

A March White House fact sheet proudly noted, “President Trump is restoring fairness and accountability in federal hiring, and terminating DEI across the federal government,” criticizing Biden-era programs that tied outcomes to race, sex, or ethnicity as “illegal and immoral.”

Identity Politics Under Scrutiny

The 2024 election underscored the pitfalls of identity politics, with some pointing to it as a factor in Vice President Kamala Harris’ loss to Trump.

Political analyst Eddie Glaude, speaking on NPR, observed, “The only thing that was woke or representational about [Kamala Harris’] campaign was her, her body, the fact that she was a woman of color. So I think that the concern, the so-called backlash, to tending to the diversity of the nation actually proves the point.”

While AOC and Sanders rally against what they see as divisive tactics, Republicans argue their approach risks perpetuating the very divisions they claim to oppose.

Trump’s administration, by contrast, champions a vision of fairness and equal opportunity, seeking to move beyond identity-based policies to strengthen national unity and restore trust in institutions.

We all know Joe and his administration were inept. But we’re finally learning the scale of it.

Because Biden’s blunders just came back to bite Donald Trump.

Clearing a Massive Grant Backlog

The Department of Transportation (DOT), under Secretary Sean Duffy, is tackling a staggering backlog of approximately 3,200 unsigned grant agreements, a legacy issue from former Secretary Pete Buttigieg’s tenure.

This pile-up, totaling $43 billion, includes $9 billion in grants selected by the Biden administration in the window between Donald Trump’s election victory and President Joe Biden’s departure, according to a DOT spokesperson speaking to Fox News Digital.

“Since coming into office, my team has discovered an unprecedented backlog of grants leftover from the previous administration,” Duffy announced recently.

The department emphasized that “nothing was done to actually get these grant agreements signed and sent to projects,” leaving critical infrastructure projects in limbo.

Cutting Red Tape for Real Results

Among the delayed projects is Rhode Island’s Washington Bridge, closed westbound since 2023 pending repairs, as noted by the state government. Duffy’s team has now secured $221 million for this vital artery, which serves thousands of vehicles daily.

“This backlog, along with ridiculous DEI and Green New Deal requirements, prevented real infrastructure from being built and funded,” Duffy stated.

“Under the Trump Administration, we’ve ripped out this red tape and are getting back to what matters.”

The DOT is fast-tracking reviews of these grants, prioritizing “executive grant agreements” for major infrastructure like roads and bridges.

Duffy, in an April 10 Cabinet meeting, acknowledged that “most of them are good” but highlighted that many lacked finalized agreements, often tangled in what he called “green and social justice requirements.”

Shifting Focus to Infrastructure Over Ideology

President Trump has pushed for a sharp pivot away from such stipulations. “Take it out,” he directed during the Cabinet meeting.

Duffy responded, “We’re pulling all that out and putting the money toward the infrastructure and not the social movement from the last administration.” Trump, with a quip, added, “Good steel, as opposed to green paper mache,” drawing chuckles from the room.

This approach reflects the administration’s broader commitment to scrutinizing federal grants, particularly those tied to ideological goals. Since Duffy’s confirmation, he has dismantled the DOT Equity Council and other “environmental justice” initiatives.

The California high-speed rail project, plagued by escalating costs and minimal progress, is now under federal investigation for its funding, signaling a no-nonsense stance on ensuring taxpayer dollars deliver tangible results.

Trump isn’t playing around. America isn’t going to be the foot stool of the world anymore.

And now the Pentagon urgently deployed a massive force for one jaw dropping reason.

Escalating Tensions and Naval Presence

A second U.S. aircraft carrier, the USS Carl Vinson, has joined operations in Middle Eastern waters, as confirmed by satellite imagery analyzed by The Associated Press on Tuesday. The deployment coincides with heightened U.S. military actions, including suspected airstrikes targeting Houthi-controlled areas in Yemen, backed by Iran, overnight into Tuesday.

The Vinson, based in San Diego, is positioned northeast of Socotra, near the Gulf of Aden, accompanied by the USS Princeton, a Ticonderoga-class cruiser, and two Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, the USS Sterett and USS William P. Lawrence.

This naval buildup supports the USS Harry S. Truman, which has been striking Houthi targets since March 15. Recent Navy footage shows the Vinson launching F-35 and F/A-18 jets, underscoring its active role.

High-Stakes Nuclear Talks

As the U.S. flexes its military might, diplomatic efforts intensify ahead of critical talks with Iran over its advancing nuclear program. The negotiations, initially set for Rome, were redirected to Oman at Iran’s insistence, though the final venue remains unclear. The stakes are immense for two nations with nearly 50 years of hostility.

President Donald Trump has warned of airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities if no deal is reached, while Iranian officials hint at pursuing nuclear weapons with their near weapons-grade uranium stockpile.

U.S. Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff, who led last weekend’s talks in Oman, described them as “positive, constructive, compelling.”

He emphasized, “This is going to be much about verification on the enrichment program, and then ultimately verification on weaponization,” adding, “That includes missiles, the type of missiles that they have stockpiled there. And it includes the trigger for a bomb.”

Witkoff also expressed optimism about diplomacy, stating, “We’re here to see if we can solve this situation diplomatically and with dialogue.”

He proposed capping Iran’s uranium enrichment at 3.67%, a level sufficient for civilian nuclear power, as agreed in the 2015 deal. “They do not need to enrich past 3.67%,” Witkoff told Fox News. “In some circumstances, they’re at 60%, in other circumstances, 20%. That cannot be.”

Revisiting the 2015 Nuclear Deal

The 2015 nuclear agreement, abandoned by Trump in 2018, limited Iran’s uranium enrichment to 3.67% and reduced its stockpile in exchange for sanctions relief and access to frozen funds. Witkoff suggested the Trump administration might use elements of that deal as a framework, though he stressed addressing Iran’s ballistic missile arsenal, a key reason for Trump’s withdrawal.

“Missiles, the type of missiles that they have stockpiled there and it includes the trigger for a bomb,” Witkoff reiterated.

Iran’s Javan newspaper, tied to the Revolutionary Guard, hinted at flexibility, stating, “Something that we have done before, why should we not carry it again and reach a deal? This is not called a withdrawal by Islamic Republic from its ideals anywhere in the world.”

However, Iran’s reliance on ballistic missiles as a regional deterrent complicates negotiations, as convincing Tehran to curb this program will be a significant challenge.

Americans are wary after Biden’s health issues were hidden. Now we have the answers.

Because Trump’s physician released his medical records for the world to see.

Strong Health Report Released

Donald Trump’s physician has declared the former president “fully fit” to serve as commander in chief, according to a summary of Trump’s recent physical released by the White House.

Trump, now 78, was evaluated on Friday. Navy Capt. Sean Barbabella credited Trump’s “active lifestyle,” saying it “continues to contribute significantly” to the Republican frontrunner’s overall well-being. Trump is set to turn 79 on June 14.

In the doctor’s report released Sunday, Barbabella wrote that Trump is “fully fit to execute the duties of Commander-in-Chief and Head of State.”

Physical Changes and Active Routine

The results show that Trump has lost 20 pounds since his last presidential physical in 2020. At that time, he weighed 244 pounds—he is now down to 224.

The summary also noted Trump underwent cataract surgery at some point in recent years. This common procedure, typically performed on aging individuals, involves replacing a cloudy lens to improve vision.

According to Barbabella, Trump’s daily schedule includes “multiple meetings, public appearances, media availabilities and frequent victories in golf events.”

Trump is known for being an avid golfer and recently said he won tournaments played at clubs he owns in Florida.

Monitoring Vital Signs and Medications

The report included updated information on Trump’s cholesterol, which has improved over time. His total cholesterol was 223 in early 2018, dropped to 196 in 2019, stood at 167 in 2020, and is now down to 140.

Ideal total cholesterol is considered anything below 200. The improvements are attributed in part to medications rosuvastatin and ezetimibe.

Trump’s blood pressure was recorded at 128 over 74—slightly elevated but not unusual for someone his age. Elevated readings can signal risk for high blood pressure over time if not monitored.

His resting heart rate was 62 beats per minute, consistent with previous years.

For adults, a normal resting heart rate ranges between 60 and 100 beats per minute, with lower rates generally indicating better cardiovascular fitness.

Trump also continues to take aspirin, a medication commonly used to reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke.

Trump is shaking up the world stage. And now foreign leaders are groveling.

And One foreign government just handed Trump a massive victory on a silver platter.

American Missionary Freed After Over a Year in Tunisian Detention

Robert Vieira, a U.S. missionary who had been held in Tunisia for more than a year, was finally released on Sunday.

The development ends a long and tense chapter for Vieira and his family, who had been awaiting his return since his unexpected detention by Tunisian authorities 13 months ago.

U.S. special envoy Adam Boehler confirmed the release Sunday afternoon, according to a Reuters report.

Vieira, whose mission work had taken him to North Africa, was detained under suspicion of espionage—an accusation that never led to a trial.

Diplomatic Pressure Yields Results

Tunisia, located between Algeria and Libya, ultimately agreed to Vieira’s release after Boehler worked closely with Tunisian Foreign Minister Mohamed Ali Nafti to resolve the matter.

“We appreciate the government of Tunisia’s decision to resolve this case and allow Mr. Vieira to reunite with his family after more than 13 months of pre-trial detention,” Boehler said.

The release signals the impact of persistent diplomatic engagement—something that gained more attention and urgency as former Trump administration officials and allies pushed for results where others had stalled.

Boehler credited his collaboration with Nafti for breaking through months of bureaucratic gridlock.

A Quiet Victory for American Strength Abroad

Following his release, Vieira flew home with his family, bringing a long-awaited sense of relief to those who had supported him during his time in detention.

Though the case had received limited media attention, it became a quiet but powerful test of America’s commitment to its citizens overseas.

Boehler, a Trump-era appointee known for his hands-on approach to diplomatic problem-solving, proved once again that direct engagement and strong international relationships can produce results.

Fox News Digital reached out to the State Department for additional comment but had not received a response as of press time.

While the Biden administration remained largely silent throughout much of Vieira’s detention, the efforts by individuals like Boehler serve as a reminder of the kind of diplomatic pressure and persistence that has proven effective under prior leadership.

Trump is enemy number one to the Left. Now their followers are taking matters into their own hands.

And a brazen assassination plot on Donald Trump left lawmakers completely baffled.

A Disturbing Threat in Pennsylvania’s Heartland

In Butler, Pennsylvania—a community still reeling from last year’s shocking assassination attempt on President Donald Trump—another chilling threat has emerged.

Federal charges unsealed Friday reveal that 32-year-old Shawn Monper, a local resident, allegedly vowed to kill Trump, immigration officers, and key federal figures, including those appointed by the president.

His brazen YouTube comment, “Nah, we just need to start killing people, Trump, Elon, all the heads of agencies Trump appointed, and anyone who stands in the way,” signals a dangerous intent that federal authorities are taking seriously, underscoring the ongoing challenges Trump faces as a polarizing leader.

Monper’s arrest Wednesday at his Butler home, just five miles from the site of July’s attack, shows law enforcement’s swift response to protect Trump and the nation.

Charged with four counts of threatening federal officials and law enforcement, Monper’s case highlights the resolve to safeguard America’s leaders, particularly a president whose bold agenda continues to inspire both loyalty and opposition.

Escalating Rhetoric and Firearm Fears

Hiding behind the username “Mr Satan,” Monper didn’t stop at targeting Trump. His online tirades grew darker, with comments claiming he’d been amassing firearms and ammunition since November’s election. “Eventually [I’m] going to do a mass shooting,” he allegedly wrote on March 13, a statement that sent alarm bells ringing.

Authorities noted Monper secured a gun permit shortly after Trump’s January 20 inauguration, raising concerns about his capacity to act on his threats.

Monper’s vitriol also turned toward Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers, whom he branded as “terrorist people” in a March post, adding, “we need to start killing them.” Such rhetoric not only threatens public safety but also attacks the very agents working to secure America’s borders—a priority Trump has championed relentlessly.

In Butler, a place that knows the sting of political violence, these words carry extra weight, reminding residents of the need for vigilance.

Justice Department Stands Firm for Safety

The Justice Department, under U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, is sending a clear message: threats against Trump or any public servant will face severe consequences. “Rest assured that whenever and wherever threats of assassination or mass violence occur, this Department of Justice will find, arrest, and prosecute the suspect to the fullest extent of the law,” Bondi declared.

Her commitment reflects a broader effort to shield the nation’s leaders and citizens, especially in a time when Trump’s leadership is steering America toward renewal.

Butler, Pennsylvania, etched into history by the July rally where a 20-year-old gunman wounded Trump, two spectators, and killed a heroic father shielding his family, doesn’t need another scar.

That attack, from a rooftop just outside the Butler Farm Show grounds, tested the community’s spirit but strengthened its resolve. Today, as Trump pushes forward with his vision for a stronger America, Monper’s arrest serves as a reminder that protecting the president and the nation’s security remains paramount, no matter the obstacles.

The US and China are at each other’s throats. Now it’s coming to a head.

And the Pentagon is on high alert after China made one unmistakable move.

Standing Firm Against Chinese Aggression

America’s resolve to protect freedom and stability in the Indo-Pacific is being tested as China escalates its military maneuvers around Taiwan.

On Thursday, Adm. Samuel Paparo, commander of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, delivered a sobering warning to the Senate Armed Services Committee, describing Beijing’s actions as more than mere drills—they’re “rehearsals” for potential conflict.

His words underscore the United States’ unwavering commitment to countering threats that could destabilize a region vital to global prosperity.

“China’s unprecedented aggression and military modernization poses a serious threat to the homeland, our allies and our partners,” Paparo declared, pointing to a 300% surge in China’s military pressure on Taiwan.

For America, this isn’t just about geopolitics—it’s about defending the principles of sovereignty and self-determination that Taiwan embodies against Beijing’s push for forced “reunification,” a move the U.S. and its allies reject as a violation of the island’s will and regional harmony.

Taiwan’s Defiance Inspires Global Support

China’s aggressive posturing, driven by its “One China” policy, seeks to intimidate Taiwan, a vibrant democracy that stands tall as a sovereign nation despite Beijing’s claims. The U.S., while officially recognizing the policy, has ramped up warnings against any forceful takeover, prioritizing stability over coercion. Paparo noted that China’s tactics are misfiring:

“While the [People’s Liberation Army] PLA attempts to intimidate the people of Taiwan and demonstrate coercive capabilities, these actions are backfiring, drawing increased global attention and accelerating Taiwan’s own defense preparations.” This resilience reflects the spirit of freedom America champions worldwide.

Taiwan’s defiance, bolstered by growing international support, sends a powerful message. As China’s actions draw scrutiny, nations are rallying to ensure the Indo-Pacific remains a bastion of open commerce and democratic values—core pillars of America’s vision for a free world.

The U.S. stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Taiwan, reinforcing its right to chart its own course without fear of authoritarian overreach.

America’s Call to Outpace and Outbuild

The challenge isn’t just China’s saber-rattling—it’s their relentless drive to outpace U.S. military capabilities.

Paparo laid bare the stakes: “China’s outproducing the United States in air missile, maritime and space capability and accelerating these.” From fighters rolling out at a 1.2-to-1 clip to shipbuilding at a staggering 6-to-1.8 ratio, Beijing’s industrial edge threatens to tilt the balance. Yet Paparo remains steadfast: “I remain confident in our deterrence posture, but the trajectory must change.”

To reclaim the lead, America must tackle its own hurdles head-on. “We’ve got to get at the problems of why we don’t have enough [of a] combat logistics force – and that’s shipbuilding. Why we don’t have enough labor,” Paparo urged, calling for better pay and incentives to recruit and retain talent.

This isn’t just about matching China’s output—it’s about harnessing the ingenuity and grit that have always defined American strength, ensuring the U.S. remains the world’s unrivaled defender of liberty and security.