Home Blog Page 30

Democrats are outraged after NFL ditches woke policies and teams up with Trump instead

Prudent Politics
-
0
Democrats are outraged after NFL ditches woke policies and teams up with Trump instead

There’s a major culture shift going on in America. More and more people are opening up about their support for Donald Trump.

And Democrats are outraged after the NFL ditches woke policies and teams up with Trump instead.

NFL’s Stance on Trump Dance Craze: No Plans to Intervene

As the Trump Dance craze continues to sweep through the NFL, some critics are voicing disapproval, hoping the league will step in to halt the trend. But according to Front Office Sports (FOS), the NFL has no intention of putting an end to these celebrations.

League spokesman Brian McCarthy told FOS there’s “no issue” with the celebratory dances and no plans to prohibit them.

“There’s no issue with a celebratory dance such as what took place yesterday or the previous week with the 49ers on November 10,” McCarthy explained. When it comes to TV coverage, he clarified, “It’s up to the networks to cover them as they see fit.”

Simply put, the NFL will neither discourage players from performing the Trump Dance nor instruct broadcasters to avoid airing it.

This permissive approach has raised questions about consistency in the league’s enforcement of rules.

Critics point to a notable example: Joey Bosa was fined for wearing a MAGA hat during an interview, yet performing a dance inspired by Donald Trump’s iconic gestures seems to draw no similar penalty.

The key difference lies in the NFL’s rules. Touchdown celebrations are allowed as long as they don’t cross into excessive profanity or s*xual suggestiveness. On the other hand, league regulations prohibit players from wearing or displaying personal or political statements on their attire.

This distinction explains why Bosa’s MAGA hat earned a fine while his participation in the Trump Dance on November 10 did not.

Since then, other players, including Brock Bowers, Nick Bosa, Za’Darius Smith, Malcolm Rodriguez, and Calvin Ridley, have joined the trend, enthusiastically doing the Trump dance after key plays.

If the league had attempted to clamp down on Trump Dance celebrations, it might have faced significant backlash—not just from fans but from Donald Trump himself, who would likely seize the opportunity to criticize the NFL.

Such a move would also require the league to reconcile its current stance with its response to the Kaepernick protests, which were overtly political and explicitly aimed at advocating for social change.

The Trump Dance, by contrast, doesn’t overtly disrupt games or violate league rules against vulgarity. Additionally, it lacks an overtly political message, making it more challenging for the NFL to justify restricting it.

The league appears mindful of avoiding another clash with Trump, especially after his criticism of the NFL during the Kaepernick protests. As FOS’s Michael McCarthy points out, Trump’s vocal opposition may have contributed to an 8% and 10% drop in NFL viewership during the 2016 and 2017 seasons, respectively.

For now, the NFL’s position is clear: the Trump Dance celebrations will continue, as long as they remain within the bounds of league rules.

And that response alone is likely causing Leftist NFL fans to lose their minds.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Homeland Security sounds the alarm on secret infiltration of the US

Prudent Politics
-
0
Homeland Security sounds the alarm on secret infiltration of the US

Joe Biden has opened up the flood gates at the border. It was only a matter of time before it came back to bite us.

And now Homeland Security is sounding the alarm on a secret infiltration of the US.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is raising alarms about the growing reach of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA), which now operates in at least 16 states across the U.S., according to an internal memo revealed last week.

The New York Post broke the story on Monday, highlighting that DHS officials have noted a surge in TdA’s “violent tendencies” in areas like Washington, D.C., Virginia, Montana, and Wyoming.

The gang’s presence has also been documented in California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin—spanning areas home to nearly half the U.S. population.

The memo makes a clear connection between the gang’s activities and “increases in migrant populations” in regions like the nation’s capital and surrounding Virginia suburbs.

DHS warned, “As the population of Venezuelan nationals continues to increase, the potential for violent TdA migrants is highly probable.”

The gang has reportedly targeted D.C. and nearby areas for their accessibility, allowing members to commit thefts and assaults with ease.

Border Patrol sources told the Post that members of TdA often exploit the Biden administration’s lax border policies, entering the U.S. through the southern border before being released into the country.

Gang members are frequently identified by tattoos, including a “five-point crown and a clock and roses.”

The gang’s violence isn’t hypothetical—it’s already led to tragedy.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sources confirmed earlier this year that the suspect in the February murder of Georgia nursing student Laken Riley is “an active member” of TdA.

Riley was attacked and killed while jogging near the University of Georgia campus, sparking national outrage and renewed Republican calls for stricter immigration enforcement.

Then-candidate Donald Trump joined the chorus, demanding mass deportations of criminal illegal immigrants.

Tren de Aragua has continued to make headlines, with authorities in Aurora, Colorado, revealing over the summer that the gang had overtaken an apartment complex in the Denver suburbs.

Meanwhile, in New York City, TdA members have been implicated in s*x trafficking and violent altercations, including police shootings.

Tennessee has also been hit hard, as state investigators report that the gang is running s*x trafficking operations in major cities like Nashville, Memphis, Knoxville, and Chattanooga.

Adding to the urgency, Trump announced on Monday his intent to use the military for mass deportations if he returns to the White House, underscoring the stakes in combating gangs like Tren de Aragua.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Democrats were just caught threatening journalists for one despicable reason

Prudent Politics
-
0
Democrats were just caught threatening journalists for one despicable reason

The Left can’t stand any bad press. And they’re willing to silence anyone who dares to stand in their way.

And now Democrats were just caught threatening journalists for one despicable reason.

Washington Post columnist Megan McArdle delivered a blunt assessment of liberal media bias on Monday, accusing the mainstream press of doing more harm than good for Democrats in the recent election cycle.

Her critique highlights how media indulgence of Democratic narratives may have backfired spectacularly.

“During this election cycle, I watched in astonishment as left-wing critics complained that the mainstream media was botching this election by ‘sanewashing’ Trump, failing in our duty to cover ‘not the odds, but the stakes’ and trading in false equivalence,” McArdle wrote.

“I was not astonished that progressives wanted us to spend more time criticizing Trump and less time pointing out the flaws of Joe Biden or Kamala Harris. I was amazed because they were talking as if this might affect the election’s outcome.”

As Democrats scramble to pinpoint their failures after President-elect Trump’s victory, McArdle highlighted a troubling reality for the liberal media: Americans simply don’t trust them.

A Gallup poll she cited revealed 54% of Democrats have “high trust” in the media, but that figure plummets to 27% among Independents and a paltry 12% among Republicans.

“This was damaging for the news media that had already spent down the very reputational capital that progressive critics were begging us to use. But it was also bad for Democrats. By letting them win so many news cycles, we handed them a series of pyrrhic victories,” McArdle continued.

Her column took aim at the media’s kid-glove treatment of President Biden’s glaring cognitive issues, which Democrats seemingly hoped the press would ignore until Biden’s withdrawal from the race.

“The stories that mattered the most during this year’s campaign were the ones where we had given Democrats the most ‘help.’ In the 2020 election cycle, Democratic primary contenders counted on us to give them room to move well to the left, especially on social issues, which is how Harris created the fodder for this year’s negative ads against her. This cycle, Democrats counted on us to downplay Biden’s shocking and obvious decline. The issue was handled with kid gloves, under threat of blowback from campaign operatives, readers, and even fellow journalists,” McArdle wrote.

She also criticized major outlets for parroting Democratic spin by labeling legitimate concerns about Biden’s alarming behavior as “cheapfakes.”

“In the age of the internet, it’s no longer possible to win elections by working the refs, because the only decisions that matter are made by the folks in the stands,” she warned.

“The refs can keep your coalition in line, but they can’t help you expand it — indeed, they’re likely to shrink it, as more people conclude that the game is rigged. Which means the more often your party wins the calls, the more frequently they will lose the game.”

Even The Washington Post editorial board, usually a Democratic ally, acknowledged in November that the party’s refusal to confront Biden’s obvious decline undermined their credibility.

In a stinging editorial, they argued Harris and the White House’s denials of Biden’s mental fitness destroyed Democrats’ standing as “the party of truth.”

The editorial’s subheadline delivered a scathing verdict: “Democrats’ coverup of the president’s decline hurt their claim of being the party of truth.”

McArdle’s sharp critique underscores how the liberal media’s blind partisanship has left Democrats exposed, with even their most loyal allies questioning their honesty.

If Democrats can’t face their own failures — and the media can’t stop shielding them — their future prospects look grim.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Bomb threat against this elected official left Americans holding their breath

Prudent Politics
-
0
Bomb threat against this elected official left Americans holding their breath

Political violence is becoming more common nowadays. And there’s no end in sight.

Now a bomb threat against this elected official left Americans holding their breath.

A troubling incident unfolded Monday morning when a man was arrested after allegedly entering New York State Senator Cordell Cleare’s Harlem office and threatening to harm those inside.

Authorities identified the suspect as 42-year-old Vadim Dergachev, who now faces charges including making terroristic threats, threat of mass harm, third-degree menacing, and second-degree harassment.

The incident occurred around 10:15 a.m. at the Adam Clayton Powell State Office Building.

According to police and staff accounts, Dergachev demanded to see the senator, reportedly shouting threats such as, “I’m gonna blow this place up.”

Fortunately, Senator Cleare, who represents New York’s 30th district, was not present at the office.

However, she was on the phone with a staff member who recounted the frightening confrontation.

“She said that this man had come in and demanded immediately, just said, ‘I demand, I want to see (Cleare), and if I don’t get to see her, I’m going to shoot this office up, I’m going to bomb the place, and remarks similar to that,” Cleare recalled.

The suspect reportedly made references to political figures, expressing support for President-elect Donald Trump and sharing disparaging remarks about President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.

The incident has drawn sharp condemnation from across the political spectrum.

The state legislature’s Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic, and Asian Caucus issued a strong statement, denouncing the threats and emphasizing the importance of rejecting violence in political discourse.

“Regardless of political affiliation or preferred candidates, there is absolutely no room for threats or violence in our public discourse,” the caucus stated.

“It is incumbent upon every leader, who holds a federal or local office, to set a positive example for all constituents by promoting respectful dialogue and fostering a culture of nonviolence.”

In a time of heightened political tensions, the incident serves as a sobering reminder of the need to prioritize safety, mutual respect, and civility.

Political disagreements must never escalate into threats or harm, and leaders across the aisle have a shared responsibility to denounce violence and encourage constructive engagement.

It was only months ago when Donald Trump was shot. Now he’s our next president.

We can’t allow the most barbaric of our society to dictate who gets into power.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

U.S. Senator gives away the game with an open challenge to the Supreme Court

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
U.S. Senator gives away the game with an open challenge to the Supreme Court

Americans want safe and fair elections. But now some of the most powerful politicians aren’t going to pretend they care anymore.

And this U.S. Senator gave away the game with an open challenge to the Supreme Court.

Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) brushed aside concerns over Pennsylvania election officials blatantly ignoring a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling by counting votes that had already been deemed invalid, sparking criticism over his apparent disregard for legal precedent.

Fetterman defended the controversial move during a Sunday appearance on CNN’s State of the Union with host Jake Tapper, who failed to challenge the senator’s remarks.

Tapper highlighted the ongoing recount in Pennsylvania, where Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) is fighting for reelection.

“Democratic officials in at least one key county, Bucks County, voted to count about 115 provisional ballots that are missing a signature, despite the Pennsylvania Supreme Court previously ruling that those are invalid,” Tapper explained.

Even Democrats have openly admitted their disregard for the court’s ruling. A Bucks County official brazenly justified her actions, saying:

“I think we all know that precedent by a court doesn’t matter anymore in this country and people violate laws any time they want. So, for me, if I violate this law, it’s because I want a court to pay attention to it.”

Tapper pointed out that even the Left-leaning Washington Post Editorial Board had slammed the move, calling it “corrosive to democracy” and warning, “county officials do not get to decide whether a legal requirement is material and must be followed. Courts do, and they have spoken clearly.”

But when pressed on the Democrats’ decision to defy the court’s ruling, Fetterman shrugged it off as insignificant.

“I think you just pointed out that it refers to about 115 ballots, and that’s not going to have an impact on this race at this point,” he said, downplaying the issue.

However, in the very next breath, Fetterman contradicted himself, acknowledging, “Where we are now, it’s very, very close.”

Fetterman then tried to pivot by suggesting that Republican candidate Dave McCormick would act similarly if the situation were reversed.

“I guarantee you, if Dave McCormick were in the opposite situation, where he was down 15,000 to 17,000 votes, he would absolutely want to have every last vote counted as well too,” he said.

Fetterman’s dismissive attitude toward upholding election laws raises serious concerns about his priorities.

Instead of standing for transparency and the rule of law, he appears willing to defend actions that undermine trust in Pennsylvania’s election integrity — so long as it benefits his party.

WATCH:

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Donald Trump presidential victory ends the career of this fraudulent election pollster

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Donald Trump presidential victory ends the career of this fraudulent election pollster

Trump is cleaning out the establishment class one person at a time. His second term hasn’t even started yet and heads are rolling.

And Donald Trump’s presidential victory ends the career of this fraudulent election pollster.

J. Ann Selzer Steps Back From Election Polling Amid Controversy Over Erroneous Iowa Results

J. Ann Selzer, a longtime figure in political polling, has announced her departure from election polling just weeks after her once-renowned Iowa survey predicted Vice President Kamala Harris leading the state — only for President Donald Trump to win it by a decisive 13-point margin on Election Day.

The Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll, released on the Saturday before the election, sparked widespread criticism after projecting Harris 3 points ahead of Trump in the battle for Iowa’s six electoral votes. The prediction marked a 7-point gain for Harris compared to the poll’s findings a month earlier, but it was a stark 16 points off the actual outcome.

The poll’s release sent ripples through the political sphere, momentarily boosting Democratic hopes that Harris could flip a state Trump had easily carried in 2016 and 2020. However, the actual result reinforced Iowa’s evolution from a swing state to reliably Republican territory — a trend solidified since its last vote for a Democrat, Barack Obama, in 2012.

In a guest op-ed for The Des Moines Register, Selzer, who has conducted the Iowa Poll since 1987, claimed her decision to step back had been planned for over a year. She emphasized her intent to pursue “other ventures and opportunities” which are assumedly unrelated to election polling.

“Would I have liked to make this announcement after a final poll aligned with Election Day results? Of course. It’s ironic that it’s just the opposite,” she wrote.

Selzer also took to X (formerly Twitter) to address speculation about the timing of her exit. “Oh, and mentions of ‘retirement’ are inaccurate. It’s been a long-time plan that this election would be my last work of this sort. Other work continues,” she posted.

Critics were not convinced. The timing of her departure, coupled with the dramatic polling miss, fueled skepticism online. Many accused her of walking away to avoid accountability, with one X user posting, “Ann Selzer’s retirement makes one thing totally clear. She didn’t catch an outlier. She didn’t make an honest mistake. She cooked the books and released a poll that she knew wasn’t just wrong but dishonest.”

Selzer has pushed back against these allegations, maintaining her reputation for integrity while acknowledging the glaring miss. On the same morning as her announcement, she released a post-mortem evaluation of the poll but admitted she found “nothing to illuminate the miss.”

“Since election night, I’ve worked my way through possible explanations for the dramatic difference between the final Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll that my company conducted,” Selzer wrote in the document. “To cut to the chase, I found nothing to illuminate the miss.”

Although she defended her methodology, Selzer floated several theories in her report, including respondents potentially lying or changing their minds after being surveyed.

She also suggested that the poll may have failed to capture shifting support among men of color toward Trump, as 84% of the respondents were white — reflective of Iowa’s demographics.

Online reactions were swift and unforgiving. Critics dismissed her explanations as inadequate, with some accusing her of evading responsibility.

“Thank God I never have to hear the words ‘gold standard’ and Ann Selzer again,” one X user quipped. “A 17% whiff will do that.”

Despite the backlash, Selzer stood firm in her op-ed, defending her career and methodology while acknowledging the magnitude of the error. “I’ll continue to be puzzled by the biggest miss of my career,” she concluded.

As Selzer moves on from election polling, her legacy remains a topic of debate. Once celebrated as a “gold standard” in political surveys, her final poll has cast a shadow over her storied career.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Donald Trump Jr. uncovers Joe Biden’s sinister scheme to kneecap his father

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Donald Trump Jr. uncovers Joe Biden’s sinister scheme to kneecap his father

The Left isn’t happy that Trump will be back in the White House. Now they’re stooping to extreme lows.

And Donald Trump Jr. uncovered Joe Biden’s sinister scheme to kneecap his father.

Donald Trump Jr. delivered a sharp rebuke Sunday, asserting that the Biden administration’s latest aid to Ukraine is an attempt to ignite “World War 3” before his father, President-elect Donald Trump, can take office in January and restore peace.

In a troubling move, President Joe Biden, 81, authorized the Ukrainian military to deploy American-supplied long-range missiles against targets inside Russia.

This dramatic escalation marks a departure from Biden’s prior claims of seeking to de-escalate the war — a war many argue has been prolonged by his administration’s reckless spending and lack of strategy.

Trump Jr., 46, took to X (formerly Twitter) to expose what he sees as a dangerous plot by the entrenched Washington establishment to derail his father’s peace plans.

“The Military Industrial Complex seems to want to make sure they get World War 3 going before my father has a chance to create peace and save lives,” he wrote.

“Gotta lock in those $Trillions. Life be d*mned!!! Imbeciles!”

Biden’s latest move green-lights Ukraine’s use of U.S.-made Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to strike Russia’s Kursk region.

These missiles, with a range of nearly 190 miles and devastating explosive capabilities, have long been on Ukraine’s wish list as they face crushing setbacks on the battlefield.

Biden’s decision to send these weapons comes after months of Ukrainian lobbying, signaling yet another misstep in his chaotic foreign policy.

With February marking three years of a devastating conflict that has claimed tens of thousands of Ukrainian civilian lives, President-elect Trump is making it clear that real leadership and a path to peace are on the way.

Not only that, but the Wall Street Journal cited unnamed intelligence sources that over one million people on both sides have been k*lled or injured in the war.

These are staggering numbers that should make everyone pause.

Since his election victory, Trump has already engaged in conversations with both Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin, laying the groundwork for his promised solution.

“As President Trump has said on the campaign trail, he is the only person who can bring both sides together in order to negotiate peace, and work towards ending the war and stopping the k*lling,” Trump’s communications director Steven Cheung reaffirmed to the New York Post.

While the details of Trump’s plan remain under wraps, his track record of negotiating tough deals and standing up to global powers suggests hope for an end to the senseless bloodshed — something Biden has failed to deliver.

Meanwhile, Trump Jr., known for his fierce loyalty to his father’s vision, is playing a pivotal role on the transition team, helping steer the ship as the Trump administration prepares to undo the damage of Biden’s disastrous foreign and domestic policies.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Huge presidential pardon news rocks Capitol Hill to its core

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Huge presidential pardon news rocks Capitol Hill to its core

Law-fare has become common practice. The legal system is no longer respected.

And now huge presidential pardon news rocked Capitol Hill to its core.

Ana Navarro of The View is urging President Joe Biden to pardon his son Hunter for his gun and tax crimes before Donald Trump takes office, framing the suggestion as a counter to Trump’s alleged leniency toward political allies and supporters.

Navarro’s plea underscores the growing tension within Democratic circles as Hunter Biden’s legal troubles threaten to dominate headlines during the transition to a Trump administration.

Hunter Biden, convicted on three felony gun charges in June and guilty of nine tax-related charges in September, faces sentencing in December.

Despite President Biden’s repeated assertions that he will not pardon his son, Navarro is advocating for a reversal in that stance. Her reasoning? Trump’s expected willingness to pardon January 6 rioters.

“Joe, since they’re talking smack about you anyway, maybe pardon Hunter,” Navarro said during Tuesday’s show. “Pardon Hunter because basically America just pardoned a criminal who was convicted of felonies.”

Navarro attempted to draw a comparison between Hunter Biden’s situation and Trump’s decision to pardon Charles Kushner, the father of Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.

Recalling Kushner’s 2005 convictions for tax evasion and witness tampering, Navarro recounted the infamous incident where Kushner hired a prostitute to entrap his brother-in-law and used secretly recorded footage in a family dispute over money.

“America just elected a man who pardoned Jared Kushner’s father,” Navarro said, though her convoluted explanation left even her co-hosts struggling to follow. She added, “Well, whatever the flowchart is, it’s nasty.”

Navarro further justified her argument by pointing out that Trump, in his final hours as president, pardoned high-profile figures like rapper Lil Wayne, advisors Steve Bannon and Roger Stone, and others.

She speculated that Trump might pardon January 6 rioters if re-elected, saying, “He’s probably gonna pardon some of the folks from January 6, those insurrectionists. So you know what? It’s your son. He probably wouldn’t have been prosecuted if his last name wasn’t Biden.”

Her remarks highlight the stark contrast between the outgoing administration’s stance on accountability and Trump’s pledge to hold political elites like Hunter Biden to account. Trump’s campaign promises have included prosecuting political corruption, and Navarro’s comments underscore the anxiety within the Biden family about what might come next.

Evidence presented during Hunter Biden’s trials has only added to the controversy.

Messages retrieved from Hunter’s infamous laptop reveal admissions of his drug addiction, while prosecutors introduced the Colt Cobra revolver he illegally purchased while battling addiction.

In his tax case, Hunter faces charges of evasion, filing fraudulent returns, and failing to pay taxes — offenses that could lead to a combined prison sentence of over 40 years, though experts predict far less time for the first-time offender.

Adding to the political drama is the fact that both presiding judges in Hunter’s cases were appointed by Trump, potentially signaling a tougher stance than Hunter might have faced under other circumstances.

Navarro’s push for a preemptive pardon reflects growing concerns that Trump’s Justice Department will pursue Hunter aggressively if his father doesn’t act.

As Biden’s term winds down, Navarro’s suggestion exemplifies the Democrats’ internal panic over what a Trump administration might mean for their political and personal priorities.

For Trump supporters, this moment only reinforces their argument that a new era of accountability is long overdue.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Pentagon caught destroying evidence after Trump announces this new plan for the military

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Pentagon caught destroying evidence after Trump announces this new plan for the military

The woke generals in the Pentagon are terrified. They don’t want Donald Trump to find their secrets.

And the Pentagon was caught destroying evidence after Trump announces this new plan for the military.

Pentagon in Turmoil Over Trump Administration’s Plans to Target ‘Woke’ Military Leaders

The Pentagon is reportedly in chaos as senior military officials brace for sweeping changes under the incoming Trump administration. According to sources, the administration plans to remove top military leaders who prioritized diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) over combat readiness.

One insider described the atmosphere as resembling a hornet’s nest being kicked over, adding that “DEI pages are starting to disappear off the main websites.” The source continued, “They’re being archived as we speak. They are full-bore focused on cleaning up anything DEI-related.”

The anxiety among senior military officials is palpable. Another source claimed that many are scrambling to determine if they’re on a potential list of leaders to be ousted. “They are in panic mode,” the source said.

Executive Order to Target DEI Advocates

The Trump transition team has reportedly begun compiling names of senior officers who pushed DEI initiatives. According to one source familiar with the effort, an executive order has already been drafted to establish a panel tasked with recommending these officers for dismissal. The source confirmed that the order is “definitely” heading to Trump’s desk, though it may still be undergoing revisions.

“This is for real. This [EO] has made the cut,” the source said, noting that the document is being refined in consultation with incoming Pentagon leadership.

Key Advocates Leading the Effort

The initiative has enlisted the help of prominent whistleblowers, including retired Army Lt. Col. Pete “Doc” Chambers and retired Army Chief Warrant Officer 2 Samuel Shoemate. Both men have been vocal critics of what they describe as woke policies within the military. Chambers, a 39-year Army veteran, left the service after being told not to provide informed consent to his troops regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. Shoemate, meanwhile, gained attention for running a whistleblower website and advocating for troops who opposed the vaccine mandate.

In an interview, Shoemate explained that the focus of the executive order is firmly on DEI, not COVID policies. “They are interested full speed on DEI,” he said. “They want to lop off the head of the Marxist snake. And so that’s the primary criteria that I’m trying to focus on.”

A Shift in Military Priorities

Sources emphasize that the executive order aims to refocus the U.S. military on traditional priorities, such as national security and combat readiness. “The purpose of the EO is to restore the military leadership focus on keeping the country safe and, when necessary, fighting the country’s wars… not these extraneous factors [such as] ‘white rage’ and gender identity,” one insider explained.

The drafting team behind the order reportedly includes individuals with deep expertise in military policy and law. “It was people who know what they’re talking about,” the source said.

Names Already Emerging

Shoemate and his network of service members and veterans are working to identify senior officers who aggressively promoted DEI policies. While Shoemate acknowledges there are some leaders who merely followed directives, the focus is on those who were particularly active in advancing DEI initiatives or retaliated against troops over issues like the COVID vaccine mandate.

Shoemate said the effort has already uncovered more than a dozen names from the Navy alone, with more being look for in the Air Force and the Army. Among those expected to be targeted is Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Charles “CQ” Brown, a vocal proponent of DEI.

“Trump’s taking out the chairman. That’s gonna happen,” Shoemate stated confidently.

As the transition unfolds, the military appears braced for significant changes, with sources suggesting this marks a pivotal shift away from radical Leftist policies and back toward traditional defense priorities.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Joe Biden undercut Donald Trump big time with one dirty move

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Joe Biden undercut Donald Trump big time with one dirty move

Biden’s time is almost up. But he has a few more tricks up his sleeve.

And now Joe Biden undercut Donald Trump big time with one dirty move.

The Biden administration appears determined to double down on its unwavering support for Ukraine in the final months of President Biden’s term.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken confirmed Wednesday that every remaining dollar of aid will be funneled to Ukraine to bolster its ability to fight Russia, raising questions about the administration’s priorities as President-elect Donald Trump prepares to take office.

“President Biden has committed to making sure that every dollar we have at our disposal will be pushed out the door between now and Jan. 20,” Blinken stated, signaling a last-ditch effort to fortify Ukraine’s position before the transition to Trump’s leadership.

While Biden and NATO leaders push for more resources to prolong the nearly three-year war, Blinken emphasized that the goal is to arm Ukraine sufficiently for combat in 2025 or to negotiate peace “from a position of strength.”

However, this strategy seems to disregard growing public fatigue over endless spending on foreign conflicts and the lack of clear progress toward peace.

President-elect Trump has been vocal about his opposition to pouring billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars into what many see as a proxy war, instead advocating for a diplomatic resolution that prioritizes American interests.

Trump’s administration is expected to take a hard look at the unchecked flow of aid and redirect focus toward restoring strength at home rather than prolonging overseas entanglements.

The ongoing war continues to take its toll, with Russia launching a missile and drone assault on Kyiv for the first time in over two months, targeting eight regions of Ukraine.

Ukrainian air defenses managed to intercept some of the attacks, but significant damage was reported, underscoring the war’s relentless escalation.

Complicating the conflict further, North Korea has sent over 10,000 troops to aid Russia’s efforts.

According to the State Department, these forces are heavily engaged in combat in Russia’s Kursk border region, where Ukraine has managed to hold territory in an offensive that has embarrassed the Kremlin.

This unusual alliance highlights the lengths to which Moscow is going to sustain its war effort, training North Korean soldiers in artillery, drone operations, and trench warfare.

Despite Biden’s rush to send more aid, questions remain about the effectiveness of this strategy. Analysts have noted that Russia has been building up forces for a counteroffensive in Kursk, but the timeline remains unclear.

Meanwhile, Trump’s forthcoming administration promises a reassessment of Washington’s role in the conflict, offering hope to many Americans weary of endless wars and unchecked spending abroad.

As the war drags on, Trump’s leadership could signal a pivotal shift toward peace and pragmatism, moving away from the Biden administration’s approach, which critics argue has only prolonged suffering while burdening U.S. taxpayers.

“America First” advocates are eager to see a new direction that prioritizes diplomacy over escalation.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Nikki Haley just told Donald Trump this one thing that left him speechless

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Nikki Haley just told Donald Trump this one thing that left him speechless

Haley and Trump are rivals within the Republican Party. However, they put a pause on their differences to defeat Kamala Harris in the presidential election.

But Nikki Haley just told Donald Trump this one thing that left him speechless.

In a recent episode of her Sirius XM radio show Nikki Haley Live, former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley recounted a significant conversation with Steve Witkoff, the new special envoy to the Middle East and a close advisor to former President Donald Trump.

Haley revealed that Witkoff expressed a desire to leave behind any prior tensions, extending an offer to settle any issues between her and Trump.

“He was like, ‘What do you want? Tell me what you want. Is there anything you want?’ And I said, ‘There’s nothing I want.’ And there wasn’t anything I wanted,” Haley shared on air.

This exchange, she said, symbolized her loyalty to Trump and clarified any lingering doubts.

WATCH:

Haley’s support for Trump, however, wasn’t always assured. When Trump won the Republican nomination, there was initial skepticism about whether Haley would endorse him.

But her speech at the Republican National Convention in July, where she offered Trump a “strong endorsement,” cemented her as a trusted ally to the Republican cause.

Despite backing Trump, Haley has made it clear that she was not interested in a Cabinet position. Recounting her stance on the podcast, she explained, “Basically four times between July and Election Day, I had said that because I meant it.”

She added, “I had no interest in being in [Trump’s] Cabinet. He knew that.”

Just before Haley’s recent podcast episode, Trump took to Truth Social to clarify his stance on the involvement of former allies like Haley and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

In his post, Trump wrote, “I will not be inviting former Ambassador Nikki Haley, or former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, to join the Trump Administration, which is currently in formation.”

Expressing appreciation for their past collaboration, he added, “I very much enjoyed and appreciated working with them previously, and would like to thank them for their service to our Country. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

Haley’s influence, however, continues behind the scenes. She disclosed on her show that she has been in contact with Trump’s transition director, Howard Lutnick, sharing her opinions on potential candidates for key roles.

With half of the 26 administrative positions already filled by loyalists, some observers speculate about the possibility of moderate voices making their way into the remaining openings.

Whether or not a shift occurs, Haley’s advisory role emphasizes her impact on the makeup of the administration, even from outside the Cabinet itself. And that may or may not be something MAGA Republicans are enthusiastic about.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The View makes an announcement about Trump that has Republicans rolling their eyes

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
The View makes an announcement about Trump that has Republicans rolling their eyes

The ladies of The View are rabid Trump haters. Now they’re taking it to new levels.

And The View made an announcement about Trump that has Republicans rolling their eyes.

The View has found itself in the media spotlight since President-elect Trump’s sweeping victory, with questions arising about whether the outspokenly anti-Trump ABC talk show will shift its tone. For critics hoping for change, though, an insider says that’s unlikely.

The cast of The View shared a collective disappointment over Trump’s win against Vice President Kamala Harris, who all six co-hosts, including self-identified Republicans Ana Navarro and Alyssa Farah Griffin, had openly supported.

Rumors have swirled around whether The View would seek out voices that resonate with the 75 million Americans who supported Trump.

But a source at ABC rebuffed that speculation, telling Fox News Digital, “There is definitely a network-wide push and sense of responsibility to give a voice to the Trump electorate. But ‘The View’ didn’t have a pro-Trump voice during his first term, and that’s not expected to change.”

The insider added, “Expect to see Trump officials invited on in 2025,” hinting that the show may, at least, consider voices from the new administration as guests.

The show’s last consistent conservative voice was Meghan McCain, who co-hosted from 2017 to 2021. Although she wasn’t a Trump backer, she often clashed with the liberal panel in defense of conservative issues.

McCain, whose father was the late Senator John McCain, recently called out ABC for its lack of a pro-Trump perspective on The View, especially following Trump’s victory.

“If every panelist voted for Kamala Harris, that’s not a representation of America,” McCain said to Fox News Digital.

“Millions of conservative women are looking to see themselves represented. ABC has basically written off conservative women as if they don’t matter.”

In her critique, McCain argued that The View has little tolerance for conservative viewpoints. “They see conservative women as traitors to their gender,” she added.

“It’s so hostile that they make sure no conservative wants to stick around. Trust me, I’ve experienced it.”

ABC News didn’t directly respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

However, an ABC representative pointed out that The View is thriving with its current format, claiming, “The current panel is resonating with audiences, as the show just achieved its highest-rated episode in over a decade and hit a 4-year peak in total viewers.”

After McCain’s exit in 2021, ABC News spent months searching for another conservative voice, ultimately choosing Navarro and Griffin in 2022.

But instead of the spirited debate McCain had brought, the anti-Trump stance of both women has contributed to a one-sided dynamic.

Navarro, a vocal supporter of Biden’s campaign, even co-hosted a segment of the Democratic National Convention this year.

It remains to be seen whether The View will bring in a strong conservative voice or continue to sideline Trump’s supporters.

With Trump’s latest victory, the call for a broader range of voices may only grow louder.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

1...293031...161Page 30 of 161

2024 Copyright © All rights reserved.

Quick Links

Must Read

Popular Articles