Former Vice President Harris is busy licking her wounds. Now she can’t believe her eyes.

And Kamala Harris is furious after this incriminating report about her dropped.

Kamala Harris wasted no time fleeing Washington, D.C., after grimacing her way through Donald Trump’s inauguration, clad in what resembled a black funeral suit. By the next day, she was back in her native California, far from the political theater she had just exited.

Back in the sunny confines of La-La Land, the now-jobless former vice president has time to process what is arguably the most humiliating loss of her career. For someone whose political trajectory seemed unstoppable, this defeat has sent shockwaves through her carefully curated image.

As Harris likely stews over her fall from grace, it’s hard to imagine her not pointing fingers. Former President Joe Biden, accused of dropping out of the race too late, is one target. Donald Trump’s relentless attacks are another. Even her husband, Doug Emhoff, whose murky past brought embarrassing headlines, might not escape the blame.

Harris’ campaign, described by critics as elitist and out of touch, fell flat with voters. Celebrity-packed concerts, vague messaging, and endless word salads alienated her audience. Yet Harris seemed oblivious to these glaring issues, and her inner circle only recognized the campaign’s failings when it was far too late.

One insider told *The Post* that Harris and her team never prepared for the possibility of losing. “Even up until 6, 7 p.m. on election night, they felt very confident she would become president,” the source revealed.

Despite Harris retreating to the West Coast, her allies remain detached from political reality. Many refuse to acknowledge that her devastating loss has all but crushed her chances of running again. “If she wants to be president, she will start her campaign next year. She’s well positioned to run again,” insisted one source, echoing the wishful thinking that plagued her campaign.

Meanwhile, in Washington, D.C., the postmortem is far less forgiving. “She is done in D.C. and quite frankly was the worst major candidate of either party since Michael Dukakis,” a senior Democratic congressional source said bluntly.

Another insider painted a similar picture: “She was a mid vice president. No big screwups, but not a shining star. I think we need to move past Kamala Harris to a new generation of leaders in the Democratic Party.”

Harris’ meteoric rise from Oakland prosecutor to vice president has hit a brick wall. Her career, once buoyed by powerful connections like former lover and Democratic kingmaker Willie Brown, is now in uncharted territory. Reports suggest she’s weighing a gubernatorial run in 2026 or another presidential bid in 2028.

Adding to the bizarre optics, Harris has reportedly turned to Hillary Clinton for advice—an ironic move, given Clinton’s own humiliating defeat to Trump in 2016. The two have spoken multiple times since Harris’ loss, according to *New York Magazine*.

Harris still has loyalists spinning her potential future. One congressional source quipped, “Harris could break one glass ceiling and do the near-impossible of turning California red if she chooses to run for governor in 2028.” Yet the field for governor is already crowded with credible candidates unburdened by a national-scale loss.

“There are about five credible candidates for California governor right now, including Rick Caruso,” said a former Los Angeles district attorney. “Los Angeles is full of virtue signalers, but a lot of them may be having second thoughts about [ultra-progressive] politicians like Harris, given the wildfires.”

Since her loss, Harris has largely kept a low profile, emerging briefly to console wildfire victims in Southern California. Her Brentwood mansion was even threatened by the blazes. But any goodwill from these appearances was undercut by the optics of Gov. Gavin Newsom swooping in to grab the spotlight. Newsom, who is widely expected to run for president in 2028, used the fires as a backdrop to launch his unofficial campaign—though not without gaffes, such as pretending to be on the phone with Biden to dodge an irate resident.

Harris’ personal life has also taken a hit. Rumors about her marriage to Doug Emhoff have intensified since the election. While Emhoff has denied assault allegations against his ex-girlfriend, he hasn’t addressed claims of an affair with his children’s former nanny, Najen Naylor. His past indiscretions have done little to bolster Harris’ already shaky public image.

The fallout from Harris’ return to California has been palpable. Even her neighbors aren’t thrilled. “I’m embarrassed that she lives here, and I’m embarrassed that she represented the United States,” one Brentwood resident told *The Post*. “Karen Bass, Gavin Newsom—they’ve destroyed my state. Kamala Harris will do exactly the same. I’d rather she find another state to destroy.”

Harris, who once championed “joy” on the campaign trail, may now need to embrace a quieter existence. After spending time vacationing in Hawaii and hosting holiday parties post-election, her public appearances have dwindled. One former associate didn’t mince words: “She’s a fake and a fraud. Retire for God’s sake. Let some other people take a stab at life.”

As Harris’ star dims, one harsh suggestion seems to resonate: a move to Montecito to join the likes of Meghan Markle—another once-promising figure whose relevance has waned.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Biden oversaw the tanking of the United States economy. All of that could be turning around.

And now the Federal Reserve is in an uproar over this White House announcement.

President Trump didn’t hold back on Thursday when discussing his views on interest rates, making it clear that he wants them to drop significantly—and he expects the Federal Reserve to follow his lead.

“I’d like to see them come down a lot and oil prices will come down,” Mr. Trump said after signing a series of executive orders. He argued that lower energy prices would lead to broad economic benefits.

“And when oil prices come down, everything’s going to be cheaper for the American people, and actually for the world, but for the American people.”

Trump explained the connection between energy costs and inflation, stating, “When the energy comes down, that’s going to knock out a lot of the inflation. That’s going to automatically bring the interest rates down.”

Earlier in the day, during virtual remarks to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Mr. Trump doubled down on his stance. He told the audience he would “demand interest rates drop immediately.”

When a reporter pressed him on whether he expected the Federal Reserve to heed his call, Trump responded confidently.

“Yeah,” he said, adding that he would meet with Fed Chairman Jerome Powell “at the right time.”

The president didn’t shy away from criticizing the Federal Reserve, implying he had a better grasp of the issue than those in charge.

“I know interest rates much better than they do, and I think I know it certainly much better than the one who’s primarily in charge of making that decision,” he remarked.

The Federal Reserve is set to announce its decision on interest rates next week, with current rates hovering between 4.25% and 4.5%.

While most analysts expect the central bank to hold rates steady, Trump’s comments have added fuel to the ongoing debate about monetary policy.

This isn’t the first time Mr. Trump has taken aim at the Fed. During his first term, he frequently pressured Powell, both publicly and privately, to lower interest rates.

Despite his efforts, the Fed resisted many of his demands.

Still, the president signaled he’s willing to continue making his views known.

“I am guided by the Federal Reserve,” Trump said, before adding a caveat. “But if I disagree, I will let it be known.”

With the Fed’s decision looming, Trump’s remarks are sure to keep the spotlight on the central bank and its next move.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Everyone’s secrets are coming out now. And the Left is not happy about it.

Because a former Clinton adviser came out with a shocking revelation that is dropping jaws.

Veteran Democrat strategist James Carville didn’t hold back during a recent episode of the “Politics War Room” podcast.

Speaking with cohost Al Hunt, Carville delivered a blunt assessment of former President Joe Biden, urging him to retire quietly to his home in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, and avoid the public spotlight.

“What he’s done to himself is no one wants to hear from this guy anymore,” Carville said, expressing the frustration many within the Democratic Party reportedly feel.

“Okay, just go to your condo in Rehoboth and stay there. And that’s not because we’re bad people or we’re mean people. It was all his doing. All his doing, this entire thing.”

Carville, who has been outspoken about the Democratic Party’s embrace of “woke” ideology, placed the blame squarely on Biden’s shoulders.

According to Carville, not only have voters lost interest in Biden, but even his own party seems uninterested in hearing from him anymore.

The veteran strategist also took aim at Biden’s repeated claim that he could have beaten Donald Trump in November had he stayed in the race.

Carville didn’t mince words, dismissing the assertion entirely. “No one f***ing believes that at all!” he declared.

Carville also touched on reported tensions between Biden and others in his circle, including First Lady Jill Biden and filmmaker Alexandra Pelosi.

“I mean, just look, guy — you had a noble career. Your last act was terrible. Just get out of the way,” Carville said.

“The party’s moving on. I mean, they’re really moving on, and it’s very sad, but that’s just where we are. And he created this himself. He has nobody to blame but himself. Nobody.”

Hunt chimed in, agreeing that Biden no longer has a role in the national conversation.

He suggested that Biden might find a better use of his time by stepping away from politics altogether and focusing on raising funds for a presidential library.

Carville went even further, warning that if Biden insisted on maintaining a public presence in politics, it would only hurt him and the party.

“If he keeps this up, it’s not going to help anyone,” Carville said, making it clear that Biden’s continued involvement would likely be viewed as more of a liability than an asset.

For a strategist like Carville, who has spent decades shaping Democratic campaigns, the message was both sharp and unmistakable: the party is ready to move forward, and Biden is no longer the figure to lead them.

Wow, James Carville did not hold back on Joe Biden: "What he's done to himself is no one wants to hear from this guy anymore. Just go to your condo in Rehoboth and stay there."

"Your last act was terrible. Just get out of the way. The party's moving on."@DailyCaller pic.twitter.com/CajCL7xPhO

— Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 (@JasonJournoDC) January 23, 2025

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Sometimes it’s hard to believe the Left has a conscience. What they’re willing to do goes far beyond the pale.

And now Senate Democrats sunk a bill in Congress for one horrifying reason.

Senate Democrats on Jan. 22 blocked the advancement of the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, effectively halting Republican efforts to require medical care for infants born alive during failed abortion attempts.

The proposed legislation, introduced on Jan. 16 by Republican Sens. John Kennedy (La.), James Lankford (Okla.), and Jim Banks (Ind.), with 39 additional GOP co-sponsors, would have mandated that health care providers deliver the same level of care to infants born alive after an abortion as they would to any other baby of the same gestational age, CatholicVote reported.

Despite a Republican majority in the Senate, the bill failed to reach the 60 votes needed to advance, falling short at 52-47, The Hill reported.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) had anticipated the uphill battle, citing staunch Democratic opposition to the measure.

“[Democratic senators] will vote against protection for a living, breathing newborn baby simply because that child has been born alive after an attempted abortion,” Thune said.

A baby born alive after an attempted abortion should be entitled to the same protection and medical care that any other newborn baby is entitled to.

This shouldn’t be a controversial bill. pic.twitter.com/tq2wqpNpeC

— Leader John Thune (@LeaderJohnThune) January 22, 2025

“Democrats are afraid that by recognizing the humanity of the newly-born child, they will inadvertently point to the humanity of the unborn child.”

The bill included provisions requiring health care workers to report instances where born-alive infants did not receive proper care to law enforcement.

Additionally, it mandated that abortion survivors be transported to a hospital for further medical treatment.

Thune underscored the moral implications of the legislation, saying, “Once you recognize the humanity of the newly-born baby, it gets a little harder to say that that child wasn’t human just a few moments ago, simply because he or she wasn’t yet born.”

Democrats, however, dismissed the bill as unnecessary, claiming federal laws already prohibit infanticide. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) went so far as to call the legislation “pernicious.”

“The Republican so-called ‘born-alive’ bill is pernicious as they come,” Schumer said, accusing Republicans of pushing “false narratives and outright fearmongering” in what he claimed was an attempt to “attack women’s health care.”

He also argued the bill would create undue legal risks for doctors.

The vote came on the 52nd anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the controversial Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide and was overturned in 2022.

This week, thousands of pro-life advocates have gathered in Washington, D.C., for the annual March for Life, underscoring the ongoing divide on abortion policy in America.

Although Democrats succeeded in blocking the legislation, Republicans’ push for the bill highlights their ongoing commitment to defending the rights of vulnerable newborns—a stark contrast to Democratic rhetoric, which critics argue prioritizes political ideology over protecting life.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Donald Trump almost lost his life twice. Someone needs to answer for it.

And now the Secret Service was just rattled by a shocking announcement from President Trump.

President Donald Trump has officially nominated Sean Curran, the head of his personal Security Service detail, to lead the United States Secret Service moving forward.

The nomination was announced in a post on Wednesday evening, marking a significant milestone for Curran, who gained national attention for his heroic actions during the assassination attempt on Trump last July in Butler, Pennsylvania.

“It is my great honor to appoint Sean Curran as the next Director of the United States Secret Service,” Trump said in a statement.

“Sean is a Great Patriot, who has protected my family over the past few years, and that is why I trust him to lead the Brave Men and Women of the United States Secret Service.”

The president lauded Curran’s leadership skills and bravery, highlighting his track record of managing complex security operations.

“Sean has distinguished himself as a brilliant leader, who is capable of directing and leading operational security plans for some of the most complex Special Security Events in the History of our Country, and the World,” Trump continued.

Trump also praised Curran for his heroism during the Butler incident, saying, “He proved his fearless courage when he risked his own life to help save mine from an assassin’s bullet.

I have complete and total confidence in Sean to make the United States Secret Service stronger than ever before.”

Curran brings over 20 years of law enforcement experience to the role.

He began his career as a Special Agent in the Newark Secret Service Field Office in 2001, where he was involved in a variety of high-stakes operations.

During Trump’s first term, Curran served as the Assistant Special Agent in Charge of the Presidential Protective Division.

In this capacity, he had “direct oversight and responsibility of multiple protectees, and enhanced security plans for my residences,” Trump said.

The nomination didn’t come as a complete surprise.

Donald Trump Jr. hinted at the decision in a social media post last week, where he called Curran a “great patriot” who would “stop all the insanity once and for all.”

“There’s not a better person to be in this position!” Trump Jr. added, underscoring the widespread support for Curran within Trump’s inner circle.

As the nomination moves forward, Curran is poised to take on one of the most critical security roles in the nation, tasked with safeguarding the lives of U.S. leaders and upholding the agency’s storied legacy.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Republicans are wasting no time accomplishing Trump’s agenda. And the Left can’t take it anymore.

Now the Senate floor erupted in chaos after Republicans went on the offensive.

Leading Senate Republicans are turning up the heat on Democrats for delaying the confirmation process for President Donald Trump’s Cabinet nominees during his second term.

The fiery clash underscores the deep partisan divide over Trump’s leadership team.

The latest flashpoint came on Tuesday when Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) objected to a time agreement that would have expedited a final vote on John Ratcliffe’s nomination for CIA director.

This move prompted a sharp response from Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD), who took to the Senate floor to express his frustration.

“We’ve now wasted a whole day where we could have been acting on that nomination,” Thune said, emphasizing the urgency of the matter. He pressed his Democratic colleagues, asking, “Do we want a vote on these folks on Tuesday or vote on them on Friday, Saturday and Sunday? Because that’s what we’re going to do. This can be easy or this can be hard.”

Thune highlighted Ratcliffe’s strong bipartisan support, noting that the former House Republican from Texas had sailed through the Senate Intelligence Committee with a 14-3 vote. “This is about America’s national security interests. And we’re stalling,” he said.

Determined to press forward, Thune outlined the path ahead. “We’re going to file cloture on them. You can force us to stay here… Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. But we’re going to vote on them,” he declared.

As I’ve repeatedly said, Senate Republicans are ready to work as long as needed to confirm President Trump’s nominees. Nights. Weekends. Recesses. pic.twitter.com/yLl2hIo0pc

— Leader John Thune (@LeaderJohnThune) January 22, 2025

The delays aren’t limited to Ratcliffe. Thune also initiated procedural steps to advance confirmation votes for South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, nominated for Homeland Security secretary, and Pete Hegseth, nominated for Defense secretary. Both nominees have already cleared committee votes.

Thune’s resolve was further underscored in a post to X, where he suggested that recess appointments could be on the table—a tactic Trump has openly supported to bypass Senate delays.

Democrats defended their actions, with Murphy insisting on a “full” debate over Ratcliffe’s nomination, citing “serious concerns” about whether the nominee could “distance himself from the political interests of President Trump.”

However, Senate Intelligence Chairman Tom Cotton (R-AR) dismissed these claims, accusing Democrats of playing procedural games to block Trump’s nominees.

“What this is really about is trying to drag out all of these nominations… to try to deny President Trump his Cabinet in a prompt and timely fashion,” Cotton said.

My message to obstructionist Democrats:

Don’t make plans this weekend. We’re going to get President Trump’s nominees confirmed the easy collegial way, or apparently the hard way. pic.twitter.com/DJrA09bTqk

— Tom Cotton (@SenTomCotton) January 21, 2025

The Senate has so far confirmed only one of Trump’s Cabinet nominees: former Senator Marco Rubio, who was unanimously approved as U.S. Secretary of State and sworn in on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, additional delays loom. The Senate Judiciary Committee announced that Democrats had exercised their right to push back a vote on advancing Pam Bondi’s nomination for U.S. attorney general by another week.

As the standoff continues, Republicans remain determined to see Trump’s team confirmed, while Democrats insist on a slower process, citing the need for thorough debate.

The battle highlights the contentious nature of Washington’s partisan politics, even over critical national security and administrative roles.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Donald Trump is sparing no time going after the Left. And now they have nowhere to hide.

And Trump eviscerated one liberal for a disgusting act caught on camera.

President Donald Trump didn’t hold back his criticism of the “nasty” Episcopal bishop who lectured him during the National Prayer Service, accusing her of turning a religious gathering into a political stage.

The sharp rebuke came after Trump endured a Tuesday service led by Rev. Mariann Edgar Budde, the Episcopal bishop of Washington, DC. Budde’s sermon focused heavily on illegal migrants, refugees, and LGBT issues, a move that many saw as a direct political statement.

“The so-called Bishop who spoke at the National Prayer Service on Tuesday morning was a Radical Left hardline Trump hater,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social account shortly after midnight.

“She brought her church into the World of politics in a very ungracious way,” he continued, describing her tone as “nasty” and lacking in intelligence or persuasiveness.

Trump took particular issue with Budde’s plea for “mercy” toward immigrant families, especially children who fear being separated from their parents.

“She failed to mention the large number of illegal migrants that came into our Country and killed people,” Trump wrote.

“Many were deposited from jails and mental institutions. It is a giant crime wave that is taking place in the USA.”

The former president didn’t stop there. He criticized the overall atmosphere of the service, calling it “very boring and uninspiring.”

“As well as her inappropriate statements, the service was a very boring and uninspiring one,”

Trump wrote, adding, “She is not very good at her job! She and her church owe the public an apology!”

Rev. Budde, who also spoke passionately about “gay, lesbian, and transgender children” fearing for their safety, admitted later that her words were intended as a direct message to Trump.

“I was looking at the president because I was speaking to him,” Budde told CNN.

“I was speaking to the president because I felt he has this moment now where he feels charged and empowered to do what he feels called to do, and I wanted to say there is room for mercy.”

She further explained her intentions, saying she aimed to “counter, as gently as I could, with a reminder of [illegal migrants’] humanity and their place in our wider community.”

Budde insisted she wanted to “have these conversations in a respectful way.”

While Budde defended her remarks as compassionate and measured, Trump’s response made clear he saw her comments as a blatant political attack disguised as a sermon.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Real leadership is back in office. And our those who wish us harm should be worried.

Now this foreign enemy is cowering in fear over a threat from Donald Trump.

Russia’s foreign ministry has urged President Donald Trump to uphold the international agreement governing the Panama Canal, emphasizing that its control should remain with Panama.

Alexander Shchetinin, head of the ministry’s Latin American department, told Russian news outlet TASS that he expects Trump “will respect the current international legal regime” established by the 1977 treaties between the U.S. and Panama.

These agreements ended U.S. control of the canal by 2000 and guaranteed its neutrality under international law.

However, Trump has taken aim at Panama since his decisive election victory in November, accusing the country of allowing China to dominate the vital trade route while leaving American ships at a disadvantage. Trump claimed U.S. vessels were being “ripped off.”

During his inaugural address on Monday, Trump made his position clear, vowing that the U.S. would be “taking it back.”

Shchetinin weighed in on the escalating rhetoric, stating, “We expect that during the expected discussions between the leadership of Panama and President Trump on issues of control over the Panama Canal, which certainly falls within the sphere of their bilateral relations, the parties will respect the current international legal regime of this key waterway.”

He highlighted that over 40 nations, including Russia, signed a protocol agreement recognizing the canal’s neutrality and ensuring its safety and openness.

“[The U.S. and Panama] must protect the canal from any threat to the neutrality regime,” Shchetinin said.

He further noted, “A reservation was made that the said right of the United States to defend the Panama Canal does not mean and should not be interpreted as the right to interfere in the internal affairs of Panama, and any actions by the American side will never be directed against the territorial integrity or political independence of Panama.”

Trump has repeatedly criticized the agreement, calling it a “big mistake” made by former President Jimmy Carter.

“The United States… spent more money than was ever spent on a project before and lost 38,000 lives in the building of the Panama Canal,” Trump said during his inaugural address.

“We have been treated very badly from this foolish gift that should never have been made. And Panama’s promise to us has been broken. The purpose of our deal and the spirit of our treaty has been totally violated.”

Trump didn’t hold back, saying, “American ships are being severely overcharged and not treated fairly in any way, shape or form, and that includes the United States Navy. And above all, China is operating the Panama Canal. And we didn’t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we’re taking it back.”

Panama Canal administrator Ricaurte Vásquez refuted these claims earlier this month, asserting that China does not control the canal and that all nations are treated equally under its neutrality treaty.

The 51-mile waterway, constructed by the United States in the early 20th century, links the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, saving ships a 7,000-mile journey around South America’s Cape Horn. It remains a critical maritime trade route.

Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino responded firmly to Trump’s remarks, declaring, “The Canal is and will continue to be Panama’s and its administration will continue to be under Panamanian control with respect to its permanent neutrality.”

“There is no presence of any nation in the world that interferes with our administration,” Mulino continued, rejecting Trump’s suggestion that the U.S. “gave” the canal to Panama.

“Dialogue is always the way to clarify the points mentioned without undermining our right, total sovereignty, and ownership of our Canal,” Mulino concluded.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

It’s been a long road. But Donald Trump is finally back in power.

And now Trump got the sweetest revenge ever with one bombshell executive order.

President Donald Trump wasted no time making sweeping changes on his first day back in the Oval Office, including a high-profile move to revoke the security clearances of more than 50 national security officials who had cast doubt on the Hunter Biden laptop story.

The officials in question had signed a 2020 public letter claiming that Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop bore “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”

At the time, the letter admitted there was “no evidence of Russian involvement” but suggested the laptop’s emergence was suspiciously timed to sway the election.

The controversy began after The New York Post reported on emails allegedly showing Hunter Biden facilitating a meeting between then-Vice President Joe Biden and a top executive at Ukrainian energy firm Burisma.

The report also noted that Joe Biden later pressured Ukrainian officials to remove a prosecutor investigating the company, raising serious questions about potential conflicts of interest.

Among the officials who signed the letter were high-profile figures like former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper Jr., former CIA Directors Michael Hayden and John Brennan, former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, and former National Security Advisor John Bolton.

Trump’s action follows years of Republican criticism, with lawmakers like Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina previously calling for the revocation of security clearances for those who signed the controversial letter.

Fox News Digital had also reported that federal investigators confirmed the laptop’s authenticity, finding “reliable evidence” within its contents.

The clearance revocation was part of a flurry of more than 200 executive orders Trump approved on Inauguration Day, signaling his aggressive approach to his second term.

Alongside this move, Trump reasserted his foreign policy stance by officially withdrawing the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement—a pact originally entered into during the Obama administration in 2015.

This marks Trump’s second withdrawal from the climate accord, having first exited it during his initial term in 2020.

Other notable orders signed on day one included rescinding nearly 80 executive orders and memoranda issued under President Joe Biden, imposing a regulatory and hiring freeze across the federal government, and enacting measures to prevent “government censorship” of free speech.

Trump also directed federal agencies to prioritize addressing the ongoing cost-of-living crisis, an issue that played prominently in his campaign messaging.

Trump’s sweeping directives underscore his determination to dismantle Biden-era policies and reinforce his commitment to his “America First” agenda.

His decision to revoke the security clearances of prominent former officials sends a clear signal that he is willing to challenge the establishment and hold high-ranking figures accountable for what he and his allies see as politically motivated actions.

The revocation of security clearances, coupled with Trump’s broader executive orders, sets the tone for a presidency poised to upend Washington’s status quo and refocus attention on issues he believes resonate most with his base.

How these moves will be received both domestically and on the world stage remains to be seen, but they are already sparking fierce debate.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

As the leader of the largest Christian Church, the Pope has massive influence. Now he’s wading into American politics.

And Pope Francis sent Donald Trump a message that is dropping jaws.

Pope Francis continued a long-standing tradition on January 20 by sending a heartfelt letter to President Donald Trump on his inauguration as the 47th president of the United States.

The Pope’s message carried his prayers, blessings, and encouragement for Trump as he began his term in the nation’s highest office.

The letter opened with warm greetings and a prayer for God’s guidance and strength in navigating the immense responsibilities of the presidency.

“On the occasion of your inauguration as the forty-seventh president of the United States of America, I offer cordial greetings and the assurance of my prayers that Almighty God will grant you wisdom, strength and protection in the exercise of your high duties,” the Pope wrote.

Pope Francis took the opportunity to reflect on America’s founding principles, emphasizing the nation’s reputation as a land of opportunity and welcome.

He expressed hope that these ideals would flourish under Trump’s leadership and that his presidency would inspire Americans to work toward unity and justice.

“Inspired by your nation’s ideals of being a land of opportunity and welcome for all, it is my hope that under your leadership the American people will prosper and always strive to build a more just society, where there is no room for hatred, discrimination, or exclusion,” the letter continued.

The Pope’s words were a subtle but poignant reminder of the importance of fostering compassion and rejecting divisiveness.

His message urged the nation to rise above societal challenges and to embrace its diverse roots as a strength rather than a weakness.

Addressing the complex international challenges faced by every world leader, Pope Francis also expressed his prayers for Trump as he navigated global conflicts and sought to promote peace on the world stage.

His letter acknowledged the weight of such responsibilities and the need for divine guidance in making critical decisions that could impact millions.

“With these sentiments, I invoke upon you, your family, and the beloved American people an abundance of divine blessings,” Pope Francis concluded, extending his best wishes not just to Trump but to the American people as a whole.

Of course, Pope Francis has also been highly critical of Trump’s agenda at time.

Just a day before Inauguration Day, Pope Francis took aim at reports of potential mass deportations in the United States during a candid interview on Italian television.

Speaking on Nove’s program “Che tempo che fa” on January 19, the Pope didn’t hold back his criticism of such plans, calling them deeply unjust.

“If this is true it is a disgrace because it makes the poor unfortunate who have nothing pay the price of imbalance. This is not how things are solved,” he remarked.

While Pope Francis may be a spiritual leader, maybe he should do his homework on the American political situation before recommending policies.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Biden can’t hide anything any longer. The adults are back in charge.

And now Joe Biden was exposed for committing fraud right as Trump took over.

A recent investigation has uncovered that the Biden administration allowed funds from a federal program designed to combat AIDS to be used for abortions in Mozambique.

According to a report from POLITICO, four nurses in Mozambique received funding through the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), a program established by President George W. Bush.

This raises questions about potential violations of the 1973 Helms Amendment, which prohibits the use of federal funds for abortion in foreign assistance programs.

The investigation, conducted in October 2024 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Mozambique’s Ministry of Health, revealed that at least 21 abortions were performed in the country since 2021 using PEPFAR funds.

Reuters added that some of Mozambique’s 2,751 nurses receiving PEPFAR funding had not undergone the mandatory training explaining the Helms Amendment’s restrictions.

The nurses involved reportedly did not realize that performing abortions while receiving PEPFAR funding was prohibited.

Mozambique has since refunded the misused money, and the CDC claims to have implemented measures to prevent future misuse. However, the incident has sparked outrage and renewed scrutiny of the program.

Sen. Jim Risch (R-Idaho), chair of the Foreign Relations Committee, condemned the findings, calling the situation “disgusting.”

He warned that PEPFAR is now “certainly in jeopardy.” Risch stated, “The CDC must be investigated for its misuse of PEPFAR funds, and those who have violated long-standing U.S. laws that protect life must be held accountable.”

Concerns about PEPFAR’s funding usage had already surfaced among Republicans in 2023. While Congress renewed the program for just one year in March 2024—a departure from its typical five-year reauthorization—many lawmakers are likely to resist further extensions following this latest controversy.

Congressman Chris Smith, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health Security and Diplomacy Bureau, described the misuse of funds as “just the tip of the iceberg.” He pledged to launch a congressional investigation, stating,

“Frankly, it’s not a surprise to find that they are performing abortion with U.S. taxpayer dollars. Their denials over the years have rung hollow in the face of their aggressive promotion of abortion and collaboration with some of the largest international abortion providers.”

Smith also accused the Biden administration of attempting to “hijack” PEPFAR in 2023 by seeking a five-year reauthorization without amendments, which would have allowed funding to be used for “s*xual and reproductive health, rights, and services.”

He vowed to hold the CDC accountable through hearings and reaffirmed his commitment to protecting the sanctity of life.

House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast echoed Smith’s concerns, issuing a separate statement calling the abortions “disgraceful and unacceptable.”

He demanded a broader investigation, saying, “We need to know where else PEPFAR funds have been illegally rerouted.

The State Department and CDC must investigate to ensure that not one penny of PEPFAR goes toward abortion.”

This investigation has reignited fierce debates over how taxpayer funds are used abroad, with Republicans signaling they will demand stricter oversight and accountability before approving any future extensions of PEPFAR.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.