Kamala Harris wants all of America to forget who she really is. But that won’t be happening anytime soon.

Because Harris’ past has come back to haunt her after Americans just discovered this shocking fact.

As Vice President Kamala Harris prepares for a potential presidential run, she suddenly claims to be deeply concerned about the economic struggles of ordinary Americans. But this newfound concern rings hollow when one considers her pivotal role in creating the very crisis she now pretends to want to solve.

For four long years, Harris has been at the forefront of the Biden administration, casting critical votes that have driven America into its worst inflationary spiral in decades. Yet, despite her deep involvement in shaping these disastrous policies, she now expects the American people to believe that she can fix the mess she helped create.

Vice President Harris’s track record on economic policy is nothing short of catastrophic. One of her most notorious actions was casting the tie-breaking vote for the so-called Inflation Reduction Act in August 2022. This $739 billion spending spree, disguised as a solution to inflation, has only worsened the economic pain felt by millions of Americans.

President Joe Biden, during his speech at the Democratic National Convention, proudly acknowledged Harris’s contribution, saying, “Guess who cast the tie-breaking vote? Vice President soon-to-be President Kamala Harris, and now it’s the law of the land.”

But what has been the real legacy of this legislation? The Inflation Reduction Act was touted as a solution to the nation’s economic woes, yet its passage has only accelerated inflation, driving up the cost of everything from homes to groceries.

According to Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), rent has skyrocketed by 13 percent, and new mortgages have surged by a staggering 36 percent. Basic necessities like baby food, frozen vegetables, butter, bread, and flour have all seen double-digit price increases since Harris helped push this disastrous law into effect.

Harris’s damaging impact on the economy didn’t begin with the Inflation Reduction Act. In March 2021, she cast another tie-breaking vote to pass the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, another massive spending bill that injected more money into the economy than it could handle. This reckless influx of cash exacerbated inflation, setting the stage for the economic disaster that millions of Americans are grappling with today.

Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, didn’t mince words when describing Harris’s role in America’s economic decline. “Kamala Harris cast the tie-breaking vote on the two biggest legislative drivers of inflation: the American Rescue Plan and the Inflation Reduction Act,” Norquist stated. “She also supported the Biden-Harris regulatory regime which imposed additional costs on households.” In other words, Harris has been one of the chief architects of the economic suffering that Americans are enduring.

The statistics tell a grim story. Under the Biden-Harris administration, mortgage rates have climbed by an astonishing 156 percent. Gas prices have increased by 35 percent, energy costs by 33 percent, and transportation expenses by 28 percent.

Everyday items like eggs have risen by 53 percent, baby food by 30 percent, and bread by 24 percent. These are not just numbers on a page; they represent the real, daily struggles of American families trying to make ends meet in an economy that Harris has driven into the ground.

Harris’s economic policies have not only failed to curb inflation, but they have also actively made it worse. And now, as she positions herself as the next leader of the Democratic Party, she is proposing even more policies that would further erode Americans’ financial security.

Among her proposals are a carbon tax, a 44.6 percent capital gains tax, and a 28 percent federal corporate tax rate—policies that would stifle economic growth, reduce take-home pay, and put American businesses at a competitive disadvantage on the global stage.

It is beyond hypocritical for Kamala Harris to now claim that she can fix the economic problems she had a direct hand in creating. For four years, she has been at the helm of an administration that has done nothing but exacerbate inflation, burden American families with higher costs, and push policies that have led to widespread economic suffering.

And yet, despite her deep involvement in these disastrous policies, she now expects the American people to believe that she can turn things around.

The question that every American should be asking is simple: If Kamala Harris truly has the solutions to our economic woes, why has she not implemented them during her four years in the Biden administration? Why did she cast the tie-breaking votes for bills that have driven up inflation and made life more difficult for millions of Americans?

The answer is clear: Harris’s sudden concern for the economy is nothing more than a desperate political ploy, a last-ditch effort to distance herself from the failed policies that she has championed for years.

Kamala Harris’s actions are symptomatic of a broader problem within the Democrat Party. The party’s leadership has consistently shown that they are more interested in advancing their radical agenda than in addressing the real concerns of the American people.

From the Green New Deal to their obsession with raising taxes, the Democrats have consistently pursued policies that harm the middle class, stifle economic growth, and erode the financial security of American families.

The fact that Harris is now being positioned as the future of the Democratic Party is a clear indication that the party has learned nothing from its failures. They continue to push the same failed policies, the same reckless spending, and the same misguided priorities that have led to the economic suffering of millions of Americans. And they do so with the full knowledge that their actions are hurting the very people they claim to represent.

Kamala Harris’s legacy is one of economic failure, hypocrisy, and betrayal. She has been at the forefront of an administration that has driven up inflation, burdened American families with higher costs, and pushed policies that have made life more difficult for millions of Americans.

And now, as she positions herself for a presidential run, she expects the American people to believe that she can fix the very problems she helped create.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more of the truth in the news.

The Democrat party has fallen far from what it once was. And these sorts of incidents are becoming more and more common.

And a swing state Democrat is facing serious election interference charges.

Eugene Vindman, the former Trump whistleblower who played a key role in the first impeachment of President Donald Trump, is now facing serious allegations of violating federal election law as he runs for Congress in Virginia.

This scandal is just the latest example of the corruption and unethical behavior that has become all too typical within the Democrat Party.

The Functional Government Initiative, a watchdog organization committed to promoting government transparency and accountability, filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) on Wednesday.

The complaint urges the FEC to investigate Vindman and his political action committee, VoteVets, for what appears to be a blatant violation of federal election law. The core of the allegation is that VoteVets, a “hybrid PAC,” made an “excessive and impermissible” contribution to Vindman’s campaign.

According to federal law, VoteVets is legally permitted to contribute up to $10,000 directly to a candidate. However, records show that this limit was reached in May. Despite this, VoteVets continued to provide communications support to Vindman’s campaign, which is being classified as an “in-kind contribution.” If true, this would mean that VoteVets’ total contributions to Vindman’s campaign far exceed the legal threshold.

A spokesperson for the Functional Government Initiative emphasized the seriousness of these allegations, stating, “The public is all too familiar with politicians not acting honorably. We hope the FEC takes these apparent violations by Mr. Vindman seriously.” These words resonate with many Americans who have grown increasingly frustrated with the Democrat Party’s continuous disregard for the law and ethical standards.

Eugene Vindman is not just any candidate; he is a man who gained national attention in 2019 when he and his brother Alexander Vindman exposed details of a phone call between then-President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

This disclosure led to Trump’s first impeachment, a sham process driven by the Democrats’ relentless and baseless attacks on a president who was doing everything in his power to put America first.

Vindman’s actions during the impeachment saga were controversial, to say the least. Trump’s inquiry into the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor, an investigation that implicated Joe Biden and his son Hunter, was entirely justified.

Biden had boasted about withholding congressionally approved aid to Ukraine until the prosecutor, who was investigating Burisma, a company that had been paying Hunter Biden $80,000 per month, was fired. The Democrats twisted this legitimate inquiry into an impeachment that was nothing more than a political witch hunt.

Now, Vindman is leveraging his notoriety from this sordid episode to raise millions for his congressional campaign. But as we’ve seen time and again with the Democrat Party, where there’s smoke, there’s fire. The allegations against Vindman’s campaign are not surprising; they are par for the course for a party that has long abandoned any pretense of integrity or respect for the rule of law.

The Democrat Party’s embrace of Vindman, despite these serious allegations, is indicative of a broader pattern of hypocrisy and corruption. The same party that decried foreign interference in elections and claimed to be the guardians of democracy is now turning a blind eye to blatant violations of federal election law within their own ranks.

This is the same party that orchestrated the Russia hoax, spied on the Trump campaign, and impeached a sitting president over a perfectly legitimate phone call.

The Democrats’ double standard is not just hypocritical; it is a direct threat to our democratic processes. By allowing figures like Vindman to flout the law without consequence, the Democrats are eroding the very foundations of our democracy.

They are sending a message that laws are only to be enforced when it is politically convenient, and that those who challenge the status quo—like President Trump—will be persecuted, while their own will be protected at all costs.

The allegations against Vindman also bring to light the problematic role of Super PACs in modern American politics. While Super PACs are legally permitted to raise unlimited amounts of money, they are prohibited from coordinating directly with campaigns.

In this case, however, VoteVets, a hybrid PAC, is accused of doing just that by continuing to support Vindman’s campaign after reaching the legal contribution limit.

Kendra Arnold, executive director of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, explained the gravity of the situation to the Washington Free Beacon: “Super PACs and campaigns are not permitted to work together on communications, which prohibits campaigns altogether from using super PACs as vendors for communications. In my opinion, this would most certainly extend to hybrid PACs.”

If the FEC finds these allegations to be valid, Vindman’s campaign could face significant fines, and this could severely impact his already troubled bid for Virginia’s 7th Congressional District seat. His opponent, Republican Derrick Anderson, has been running a strong campaign focused on conservative values, law and order, and holding Washington elites accountable.

The contrast between the two candidates could not be starker: Anderson represents the voice of the people, while Vindman embodies the corruption and elitism that have become synonymous with the Democrat Party.

Eugene Vindman’s campaign is yet another example of the Democrat Party’s disregard for the law, ethics, and the American people. From his role in the sham impeachment of President Trump to the serious allegations of federal election law violations, Vindman’s actions are emblematic of a party that has lost its way. The Democrats claim to stand for democracy, but their actions tell a different story: one of corruption, hypocrisy, and a relentless pursuit of power at any cost.

As Americans, we must demand accountability. The FEC must thoroughly investigate these allegations and ensure that those who violate the law are held responsible, regardless of their political affiliation. But more than that, we must recognize that the Democrat Party’s corruption is not an anomaly—it is a pattern.

And the only way to break that pattern is to vote for leaders who will restore integrity, respect for the law, and a commitment to the American people.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Biden administration has done many horrific things. But this might just be the worst.

Because they have lashed out in a brutal attack against a former presidential candidate.

In a move that should send chills down the spine of every freedom-loving American, the Secret Service will no longer provide protection for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as reported by the New York Post.

This shocking decision comes on the heels of RFK Jr.’s announcement that he is suspending his presidential campaign and endorsing former President Donald Trump. This is not just an administrative decision; it is a glaring reflection of the anti-democratic nature of the Biden-Harris administration and the entire Democratic Party.

From the outset of his campaign, RFK Jr. faced a hostile environment, not just from his political opponents but from the very government responsible for ensuring his safety. Despite being the nephew of a president who was tragically assassinated and the son of a former attorney general who met the same fate, RFK Jr.’s repeated requests for Secret Service protection were met with a cold and calculated refusal by the Biden administration.

It wasn’t until a failed assassination attempt on Donald Trump in July that the administration begrudgingly provided RFK Jr. with the protection he was due. This is a clear sign that Biden and Harris were never interested in safeguarding RFK Jr. but were forced to act only when the political consequences of their inaction became too severe to ignore.

The recent decision to strip RFK Jr. of his Secret Service protection following his endorsement of Trump is nothing short of an act of political retribution. This move by the Biden administration is not just dangerous; it is evil.

By leaving RFK Jr. vulnerable, they are sending a message to anyone who dares to challenge their power: If you step out of line, you will be abandoned and left to fend for yourself, no matter the risk to your life.

The decision to deny RFK Jr. protection is not an isolated incident; it is part of a broader pattern of anti-democratic behavior by the Democratic Party. From the very beginning of his campaign, RFK Jr. faced an uphill battle, not just against his opponents but against the Democratic establishment itself.

The party, which claims to champion democracy, showed its true colors by preventing RFK Jr. from running in the primaries against Biden. They used every trick in the book to undermine his campaign, from harassing his team to removing his name from the ballot in several states.

This is not the behavior of a party that believes in democracy; it is the behavior of a party that is terrified of it. The Democrats are so afraid of competition and dissent within their ranks that they will do anything to silence it. RFK Jr.’s experience is a stark reminder that the Democratic Party is no longer a party of the people; it is a party of elites who will stop at nothing to maintain their grip on power.

The Secret Service, an agency tasked with protecting our nation’s leaders, has become a shadow of its former self under the Biden administration. The agency’s failure to prevent the assassination attempt on Trump is a testament to the incompetence and corruption that has taken root within its ranks.

Despite overwhelming evidence that the threat against Trump was real and imminent, the Secret Service failed to act, leading to the resignation of former Director Kimberly Cheatle after a bipartisan committee expressed its loss of faith in her leadership.

The same agency that failed to protect Trump is now being weaponized against RFK Jr. by denying him the protection he so clearly needs. This is a dangerous precedent that should concern every American, regardless of their political affiliation. The Secret Service is supposed to be above politics, but under the Biden administration, it has been reduced to a tool of political vengeance.

RFK Jr.’s decision to endorse Donald Trump is not just a political move; it is a bold stand for freedom and democracy. By suspending his campaign and throwing his support behind Trump, RFK Jr. is sending a clear message:

The Democratic Party has lost its way, and the only way to restore America’s values is to rally behind a leader who truly understands and respects them.

RFK Jr. is not terminating his campaign; he is suspending it. This distinction is crucial. By keeping his name on the ballot in key battleground states, RFK Jr. is ensuring that the voice of the American people is heard.

He understands that the stakes in this election are too high to sit on the sidelines. The future of our democracy depends on defeating Kamala Harris and the Democrats who have proven time and again that they do not have the best interests of the American people at heart.

The Democratic Party’s treatment of RFK Jr. is a microcosm of their broader agenda. They are not interested in democracy; they are interested in power. They will do whatever it takes to maintain that power, even if it means trampling on the rights and safety of their own citizens. Their refusal to protect RFK Jr. is just the latest example of their disdain for anyone who dares to challenge their authority.

This is a party that is willing to risk the life of a presidential candidate because he endorsed the wrong person. This is a party that has rigged the system to ensure that their chosen candidate, Kamala Harris, faces no real competition. This is a party that is so consumed by its lust for power that it has lost all sense of morality and decency.

The events surrounding RFK Jr. should serve as a wake-up call for all Americans. The Biden-Harris administration and the Democratic Party have shown that they are willing to go to any lengths to maintain their grip on power, even if it means undermining the very principles of freedom and democracy that our nation was founded upon.

This is not just about RFK Jr.; this is about the future of our country. If we allow the Democrats to continue down this path, we risk losing everything that makes America great. We must stand together and fight against this tyranny. We must support leaders like Donald Trump and RFK Jr. who are willing to stand up for our rights and our freedoms.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Oprah Winfrey could not be any more out of touch with reality. But she still pretends like she knows what is going on.

And now, Oprah’s shocking comments at the DNC have disgusted even Democrats.

Oprah Winfrey, once hailed as America’s talk-show queen, made a surprise appearance at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on Wednesday. Her performance, complete with a theatrical belting of “Joooooy!” in her signature vocal vibrato, was intended to rally the faithful and spread what she called “joy” among the thousands gathered. But beneath the surface of this glittering spectacle lay a sinister attempt by Democrat elites to manipulate black voters yet again.

In her speech, Oprah portrayed Democrats as the champions of justice, painting them as the only party standing against “bullies,” racists, and sexists. “I have been on the receiving end of it,” the multi-millionaire media mogul claimed, invoking the legacy of the late Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) and the struggle against segregation in the South.

But what Oprah conveniently omitted were the inconvenient truths that expose the Democrat Party’s dark and divisive past—a past that they are desperately trying to erase from public memory.

While Oprah tried to tie the Democrats to the fight for civil rights, she neglected to mention that it was Democrats who were the very architects of segregation in the South. It was Democrats who stood in the schoolhouse doors, who blocked the pathways to progress for black Americans, and who fought tooth and nail against the very civil rights they now claim to champion.

The history books are littered with examples of Democratic officials who actively opposed integration and civil rights. Alabama Governor George Wallace (D) is perhaps the most infamous of them all.

On June 11, 1963, Wallace literally stood in front of Foster Auditorium at the University of Alabama to block the enrollment of black students, a moment that will forever be etched in the annals of history as a symbol of Democratic resistance to equality.

And Wallace was not alone. In September 1957, Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus (D) ordered the state’s National Guard to block the entrance to Central High School, preventing nine black students—the “Little Rock Nine”—from integrating the school.

These Democratic leaders were not isolated extremists; they were part of a broader party-wide effort to maintain segregation and keep black Americans in a state of perpetual second-class citizenship.

Oprah’s revisionist narrative conveniently ignores the fact that the Civil Rights Act of 1964—one of the most significant pieces of legislation in American history—was vehemently opposed by many in her beloved Democratic Party. In Congress, 80 percent of Republicans supported the Civil Rights Act, while less than 70 percent of Democrats did.

To stop the bill from passing, Democratic senators launched a filibuster that lasted 75 days. They were willing to go to any lengths to prevent the legislation from becoming law.

When Democrats like Oprah stand before crowds of black voters and claim to be their saviors, they are not just lying—they are spitting on the graves of those who fought and died for the rights that Democrats once sought to deny.

Even today, the Democratic Party continues to be haunted by its racist past—and present. In 1977, none other than Joe Biden, the current Democratic President, voiced his opposition to school busing that would have integrated black students into white schools.

He claimed that such policies would lead to his children growing up in a “racial jungle.” This wasn’t a slip of the tongue; it was a deliberate statement from a man who has spent decades on the wrong side of history.

More recently, in 2019, Biden praised segregationists like the late Senators James Eastland (D-MS) and Herman Talmadge (D-GA), both of whom believed black people were inferior to whites.

Biden’s eulogy of these men was not only an affront to the progress that civil rights activists fought for but also a clear indication that the Democratic Party has never truly shed its racist roots.

Even Kamala Harris, Biden’s own Vice President, once attacked him for his opposition to school busing, suggesting during a 2019 presidential primary debate that Biden was a racist. Yet, in true Democratic fashion, Harris swept this incident under the rug when Biden chose her as his running mate, proving once again that the Democrats will abandon any principle if it serves their political ambitions.

Oprah’s attempt to link Kamala Harris to the legacy of black girls in the segregated South is as misleading as it is insulting. Kamala Harris is no daughter of the civil rights struggle; she was raised in Montreal, Canada, by two elite college professors—a Jamaican father and an Indian mother.

Harris has as much connection to the black experience in the American South as Biden has to the struggles of working-class Americans. Yet, the Democrats continue to parade her around as a symbol of progress, hoping to fool black voters into believing that she represents their interests.

The truth is, Democrats are panicking. Black voters are beginning to see through the lies and manipulation, and they are defecting from the Democratic Party in droves. The failed economic policies of the Biden-Harris administration—dubbed “Kamalanomics”—have wreaked havoc on black communities across the country.

Sky-high consumer prices, unaffordable essential goods, and a stagnant job market have made it clear that the Democrats are not the party of the people—they are the party of the elite.

But it’s not just the economy that has black voters turning away from the Democratic Party. Kamala Harris’ open-border policies have allowed illegal aliens to flood into the country, putting a strain on local governments and disproportionately affecting black communities. Public services like policing and education are being cut back to provide free housing and other taxpayer-funded perks to illegals. Meanwhile, black Americans are left to fend for themselves in neighborhoods that are becoming increasingly unsafe and under-resourced.

In contrast, former President Donald Trump has consistently stood up for the interests of black Americans. Under Trump’s leadership, black unemployment hit record lows, and black-owned businesses flourished. Trump’s policies empowered black communities by cutting taxes, reducing regulation, and investing in opportunity zones. And unlike the Democrats, Trump never pandered—he delivered real results.

As more black voters see through the Democrats’ lies and manipulation, they are turning to Trump as the leader who will fight for their interests, not just use them as political pawns. The Democratic Party has always been on the wrong side of history, and its recent actions prove that it remains so today.

Oprah’s appearance at the DNC was nothing more than a desperate attempt to whitewash the Democratic Party’s dark history and manipulate black voters into staying on their plantation. But black Americans are waking up to the truth: the Democrats have never been their allies, and they never will be. The time has come to reject the party of segregation, filibusters, and failed policies and to embrace a future of opportunity and prosperity under Republican leadership.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more of the TRUTH in the news.

Kamala Harris is campaigning on promises to help Americans recover financially from Joe Biden’s economic disaster. But her own policies are even worse.

And Harris’ new economic plan is the nightmare of everyday Americans.

Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democrat presidential nominee, has unveiled an economic plan that threatens to devastate the American economy and plunge hardworking families into financial despair.

According to Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), Harris’s plan would increase taxes by a staggering $5 trillion over the next decade, a move that could cripple businesses, stifle innovation, and drain the lifeblood from the middle class.

Harris’s economic proposal is nothing short of a full-scale attack on the American Dream. By undoing former President Donald Trump’s tax cuts, Harris aims to roll back the progress that has allowed millions of Americans to thrive.

Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which slashed the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, lowered income tax rates, and doubled the standard deduction, provided much-needed relief to American families and businesses. Under Trump’s leadership, the economy flourished, unemployment hit record lows, and wages rose for workers across the board.

But Harris, in her misguided attempt to appear “fiscally responsible,” wants to raise the corporate tax rate to 28%, a move that would reduce the deficit by $1 trillion over a decade but at what cost? Higher corporate taxes will inevitably lead to fewer jobs, reduced wages, and less investment in the American economy.

Businesses, faced with increased tax burdens, will either pass those costs onto consumers or, worse, move their operations overseas, taking good-paying American jobs with them.

Despite Harris’s claims that she will not raise taxes on those earning $400,000 or less, the Biden-Harris administration has already increased Internal Revenue Service (IRS) enforcement. This move alone is estimated to take $20 billion from working-class Americans.

Harris’s promise rings hollow when her policies are designed to squeeze every last dollar from the very people she pretends to champion.

One of the most insidious aspects of Harris’s plan is her proposal to raise the capital gains and dividends tax to a level that would be more than twice as high as China’s. China’s capital gains tax rate stands at 20%, while under Harris’s plan, the U.S. rate would soar to 44.6%. This would be devastating for American investors, particularly those planning for retirement.

ATR highlighted that under Harris’s plan, the combined federal-state capital gains tax could exceed 50% in many states, with California facing a rate of 59%, New Jersey 55.3%, and New York state at 53.4%.

Perhaps the most dangerous element of Harris’s plan is the proposal to impose a 25% minimum tax on unrealized gains for those earning more than $100 million. Unrealized gains are essentially theoretical profits that exist only on paper until an investment is sold.

Taxing these gains would not only be a logistical nightmare but also set a dangerous precedent for government overreach. The idea of taxing money that hasn’t been earned yet is not just absurd but a direct assault on the principles of free enterprise and individual rights.

According to ATR, 76% of independents oppose taxes on unrealized gains, recognizing it for the absurdity it is. Yet, Harris seems determined to push forward with this destructive policy, regardless of the widespread opposition.

Harris’s plan also includes tax hikes that would crush small businesses, the backbone of the American economy. By raising the individual tax rate for small business owners to 39.6% from the current 37%, Harris is signaling her disdain for entrepreneurship and innovation.

Small business owners, already struggling with the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic, would be hit hard by these tax increases, forcing many to cut jobs, reduce hours, or close their doors altogether.

Adding insult to injury, Harris proposes a second “death tax,” which would impose a mandatory capital gains tax at death, in addition to the current death tax. This double taxation would make it even harder for families to pass down businesses and farms to future generations, further eroding the foundations of American prosperity.

Harris’s economic plan also reveals her commitment to a globalist agenda that prioritizes international interests over American competitiveness. By imposing a 21% global minimum corporate tax rate, Harris would go beyond the Organization for Economic Development’s (OECD) current 15% global minimum tax rate.

This would put American businesses at a severe disadvantage on the global stage, forcing them to compete with companies in countries with far more favorable tax environments.

Harris’s plan to quadruple the tax on stock buybacks is another blatant attack on the American economy. Stock buybacks, often used by companies to return value to shareholders, are a key component of many Americans’ retirement accounts, including 401(k)s.

By imposing this tax, Harris is effectively raiding the retirement savings of millions of Americans to fund her bloated government programs.

In a move that could only be described as economic suicide, Harris proposes a $37 billion tax on American energy. This tax would drive up energy costs for every American household, disproportionately affecting those already struggling to make ends meet.

Harris’s plan also includes a 30% federal excise tax on electricity used in cryptocurrency mining, a move that could stifle innovation in one of the most exciting and dynamic sectors of the economy.

Finally, Harris’s plan calls for a 32% increase in Medicare taxes, a burden that will be felt by every American who relies on this critical program. Instead of addressing the root causes of rising healthcare costs, Harris’s solution is to simply throw more taxpayer money at the problem, further bloating an already inefficient government bureaucracy.

In sum, Kamala Harris’s economic plan is a $5 trillion disaster waiting to happen. Her policies would burden American households and businesses with crushing taxes, drive jobs and investment overseas, and stifle the entrepreneurial spirit that has made America the greatest nation in the world.

Harris’s plan is not just an economic disaster; it is a betrayal of the American people. It is a clear indication of how much the Democrats hate America and how determined they are to destroy everything that makes this country great. Under Harris’s leadership, the American Dream would become a distant memory, replaced by a nightmarish vision of endless taxes, government overreach, and economic stagnation.

The stakes have never been higher. If Kamala Harris is allowed to implement her destructive policies, the America we know and love could be lost forever. It is up to every patriotic American to stand up, speak out, and fight back against this assault on our freedom, our prosperity, and our future.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

Kamala Harris is extremely unpopular even within her own party. And this was made even more obvious during this past week.

As Harris was snubbed at the DNC by her own party during the nomination.

As the Democratic National Convention (DNC) took its symbolic roll call on Tuesday, the cracks within the Democratic Party became glaringly evident.

In what should have been a moment of unity, 44 delegates voted “present” instead of casting their vote for Kamala Harris, a gesture that highlighted the severe and growing division within the party.

The roll call vote, while symbolic, served as a barometer for the level of dissent simmering beneath the surface of the Democratic establishment.

Although Harris had already been officially nominated as the party’s candidate in a virtual roll call earlier in the month, the 44 present votes were a clear rebuke of the Biden-Harris ticket, especially considering the motivations behind these dissenting votes.

Among those who voted “present” were likely members of the “Uncommitted” protest movement, a faction within the Democratic Party that has expressed profound disillusionment with the Biden administration’s policies, particularly concerning the Israel-Hamas conflict.

The Daily Caller reported that the movement, consisting of at least 36 delegates, felt “deeply hurt and betrayed” by President Biden’s decision to continue funding what they describe as “war crimes and the mass killing of Palestinians.”

This protest vote is not just a symbolic gesture; it is a manifestation of the deep ideological rift within the Democratic Party, a rift that has been exacerbated by Kamala Harris’s controversial positions and her close association with the Biden administration’s foreign policy decisions.

For a party that has long prided itself on diversity and inclusivity, the stark opposition to Harris’s nomination from within its own ranks is a glaring contradiction.

The state of Minnesota, home to Harris’s running mate, Tim Walz, emerged as a hotbed of dissent, with 10 delegates voting “present.” This is particularly significant given that Walz, as the governor of Minnesota, should have had a solid base of support within his home state.

Instead, the large number of dissenting votes from Minnesota underscores the growing discontent with the Democratic ticket, even within Walz’s own backyard.

The rebellion, however, was not confined to Minnesota. Delegates from Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, Texas, and Washington also registered their discontent by voting “present.”

The 44 votes against Harris are more than the 37 delegates who pledged to vote “Uncommitted” before Biden’s departure from the race, indicating that the opposition to Harris is not only persistent but also growing.

According to NBC News, Harris secured 4,567 delegates in the official virtual roll call, far exceeding the 1,967 delegates needed for the nomination. But numbers alone do not tell the full story. The significant number of present votes represents a broader discontent that is not reflected in the official tally.

The fact that nearly four dozen delegates felt compelled to openly dissent against Harris’s nomination speaks volumes about the underlying tensions within the party.

Washington State’s Yaz Kader and Sabrene Odeh were among those who voted “present” during the online roll call. Kader, in particular, made it clear that his vote was a protest against the Biden-Harris administration’s foreign policy, specifically its handling of the Israel-Palestine conflict.

“I entered my vote on behalf of a 10-year-old who was bombed and killed on her 10th birthday,” Kader told the Seattle Times. In total, nine delegates from Washington State voted “present,” further illustrating the depth of opposition to Harris’s candidacy.

These votes are not just about policy disagreements; they are about the moral and ethical direction of the Democratic Party. The fact that delegates felt the need to protest against Harris, who was supposedly chosen to unify and energize the party, is a damning indictment of her ability to lead.

Kamala Harris, once seen as a rising star within the Democratic Party, is now at the center of a growing storm. Her candidacy was supposed to galvanize the party’s base, bringing together diverse constituencies and bridging the ideological divide between the party’s establishment and its progressive wing. Instead, Harris has become a lightning rod for discontent, with significant portions of the party openly rejecting her leadership.

This division within the Democratic Party is not just a temporary blip; it is a symptom of a deeper, more profound crisis. The party’s leadership, epitomized by figures like Harris and Biden, has failed to address the growing concerns of its more progressive members, particularly on issues like foreign policy, social justice, and economic inequality. As a result, the party is fracturing, with no clear path to reconciliation.

The Democratic Party is facing a moment of reckoning. The significant number of present votes during the DNC’s roll call, coupled with the nightly protests in Chicago, are clear signs that the party is deeply divided. Kamala Harris, far from being a unifying figure, has become a symbol of the party’s internal discord. As the 2024 election approaches, the Democrats must confront this division head-on or risk tearing themselves apart.

For Republicans, this division within the Democratic Party represents an opportunity. The discontent and disillusionment among Democratic delegates and voters are palpable, and the GOP must capitalize on this moment to present a unified, coherent vision for the future.

With Kamala Harris struggling to gain the full support of her own party, the Republicans have a chance to appeal to disaffected Democrats and independents who are looking for strong, principled leadership.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

National security under the Biden administration has been terrible. But new developments highlight just how bad it really is.

And new national security problems linked to Trump’s shooter have Americans worried.

In a shocking revelation that has left many questioning the integrity of federal security agencies, Rep. Mike Waltz (R-FL) has disclosed that Thomas Matthew Crooks, the would-be assassin of former President Donald Trump, had multiple encrypted messaging accounts based overseas.

These accounts, located in Germany, New Zealand, and Belgium, have raised serious concerns about the ease with which a young healthcare aide was able to communicate on platforms notoriously difficult for U.S. law enforcement to access.

Rep. Waltz, a former Green Beret and one of the 13 members of the task force investigating the attempted assassination at the Butler rally, expressed deep frustration with the lack of transparency and urgency from federal agencies.

“We still haven’t learned a lot. We haven’t learned that much about those overseas accounts,” Waltz told reporters, according to Fox News. “We do know that they were in, if I get this correctly, Belgium, New Zealand, and Germany.”

Waltz’s remarks underscore the disturbing reality that Crooks, a 19-year-old with a seemingly mundane job as a healthcare aide, was using encrypted platforms that are based in countries where it is notoriously challenging for U.S. law enforcement to conduct investigations.

“Why does a 19-year-old kid who is a healthcare aide need encrypted platforms not even based in the United States, but based abroad, where most terrorist organizations know it is harder for our law enforcement to get into? That’s a question I’ve had since day one,” Waltz added.

JUST IN — Congressman Mike Waltz says the Trump shooter had three encrypted accounts OVERSEAS, at the same time we're having an Iranian plot to assassinate Trump, per FBI briefing
pic.twitter.com/uGIIqiGLay

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) July 19, 2024

The Florida congressman did not mince words when it came to the failures of the FBI and the Secret Service. Waltz criticized these agencies for withholding critical information regarding their investigations, stating that such secrecy has only compounded the nation’s vulnerability.

“They need to be releasing information as they come across it because this wasn’t an isolated incident,” Waltz urged.

This statement brings to light a larger issue within federal security agencies: the troubling pattern of withholding information from the public, even in situations that pose an imminent threat to national security.

The American people have a right to know the extent of the danger they face, especially when it concerns the life of a former president who remains one of the most influential figures in the nation.

Waltz’s revelations about Crooks’ overseas accounts also bring into focus a broader and more disturbing pattern of threats against Trump. The congressman cited a foiled plot by a Pakistani national who had hired hitmen to assassinate Trump and other U.S. officials.

This plot, along with the Butler rally shooting, highlights a growing and persistent threat against Trump, a threat that federal agencies appear either unwilling or unable to fully address.

The fact that Crooks was able to evade Secret Service security on the day of the Butler rally, climb onto a rooftop within 150 yards of Trump, and take several shots at him is a chilling testament to the failure of these agencies.

Crooks not only managed to fire at Trump but also tragically killed a member of the crowd and critically injured two others. That Trump was hit in the ear but managed to move his head at the last second, sparing his life, is nothing short of a miracle. Yet, this near-tragedy has exposed severe deficiencies in the protection of a former president.

This incident should serve as a wake-up call for all Americans, especially those in positions of power and responsibility. The complacency and lack of transparency from federal agencies in the wake of such a grave threat cannot be tolerated.

The American people deserve better; they deserve agencies that are not only capable of protecting their leaders but also willing to communicate openly about the threats they face.

Moreover, the use of encrypted messaging platforms based overseas by a young man like Crooks raises significant concerns about the ease with which individuals can access these tools to plan and execute attacks.

It is no secret that terrorist organizations and other malign actors have long used such platforms to evade detection by U.S. authorities. That Crooks was able to do the same raises alarming questions about the vulnerabilities within our own national security infrastructure.

The attempted assassination of Donald Trump at the Butler rally is not just an isolated incident but a reflection of a larger problem. The federal agencies tasked with protecting our leaders and securing our nation must be held accountable for their failures.

There must be a thorough and transparent investigation into how Crooks was able to plot and attempt such an attack, and why critical information about his overseas accounts was not disclosed earlier.

Furthermore, the American people deserve answers as to why these agencies have failed to address the growing threats against Trump, particularly from foreign actors. The fact that a Pakistani national was able to hire hitmen to target Trump and other officials should have set off alarm bells within these agencies. Instead, it seems that the federal response has been sluggish and insufficient.

In light of these revelations, there must be a renewed focus on strengthening the security measures surrounding former President Trump and other high-profile figures. This includes not only bolstering physical security at events like the Butler rally but also enhancing the ability of federal agencies to monitor and intercept communications on encrypted platforms based overseas.

The use of such platforms by a would-be assassin like Crooks is a clear indication that our current security protocols are inadequate.

It is imperative that Congress takes immediate action to ensure that federal agencies have the tools and resources they need to effectively counter these threats.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Democrats claim to have the interests of the people at heart. But it is beyond obvious that this is not the case.

Because a liberal state has stolen million from taxpayers in order to fund their Radical scheme.

In a shocking and anti-American move, the Hacienda Community Development Corporation (CDC) has implemented a taxpayer-funded down payment assistance scheme that blatantly discriminates against American citizens.

Through its Camino a Casa program, Hacienda CDC provides a staggering $30,000 in down payment assistance to non-citizens in Oregon while refusing to extend the same support to hardworking American citizens.

This is yet another example of how the Radical Left, aided by the Democratic Party, consistently prioritizes the interests of non-citizens over the needs of American families.

The Radical Left, with their stranglehold on Democratic policies, has once again demonstrated their disdain for the American people. By funneling taxpayer dollars to support non-citizens, they are not only harming American citizens but actively working to make their lives more difficult.

This outrageous scheme in Oregon is just the latest in a series of policies that highlight the Left’s true agenda: to undermine the American way of life and prioritize the needs of foreigners over those of the very people who built this nation.

It is important to recognize that this is not an isolated incident. Time and again, the Democratic Party and their radical allies have pushed for policies that harm American workers, taxpayers, and families.

From open borders to sanctuary cities, the Left is relentless in their efforts to put the interests of non-citizens ahead of those of American citizens. The Hacienda CDC’s Camino a Casa program is a glaring example of this betrayal.

The Hacienda CDC’s Camino a Casa program provides $30,000 in down payment assistance exclusively to non-citizens, effectively shutting out American citizens from the benefits of this taxpayer-funded program.

To add insult to injury, this program is funded by the hard-earned dollars of Oregon taxpayers—citizens who are struggling to find and afford homes in a state grappling with a severe housing shortage.

Republican Oregon state Representative Ed Diehl rightly called out this injustice, stating, “American citizens in Oregon are struggling to find and buy a home. We have a severe housing shortage in this state. I am appalled that the hard-earned, limited tax dollars of Oregonians are being used to prioritize home ownership for certain non-US citizens. Oregon can’t end this state-sponsored discrimination soon enough.”

Diehl’s words echo the frustration and anger felt by many Oregonians who are tired of being sidelined by policies that favor non-citizens over them.

The Hacienda CDC’s program is not operating in a vacuum. It is supported by the Economic Equity Investment Program (EEIP), an initiative that was established through the Economic Equity Investment Act (SB 1579) and passed by the Oregon assembly in 2022.

The EEIP was originally intended to promote equity goals and provide assistance to individuals in need of money to buy land or properties. However, in practice, it has become a tool for the Radical Left to push their anti-American agenda by prioritizing non-citizens over American citizens.

In 2024, the Oregon state legislature poured an additional $8 million into the EEIP to fund organizations like Hacienda CDC. These funds are supposed to support “culturally responsive services to support economic stability, self-sufficiency, wealth building, and economic equity among disadvantaged individuals, families, businesses, and communities.”

However, the term “disadvantaged” has been twisted by the Left to include non-citizens while excluding American citizens, who are struggling just as much—if not more—in today’s economy.

The Daily Caller reported that the contract between Hacienda CDC and the state of Oregon clearly states that the organization must consider all eligible beneficiaries and not refuse to work with individuals based on protected class considerations.

Yet, by exclusively offering down payment assistance to non-citizens, Hacienda CDC is effectively discriminating against American citizens—a clear violation of their contract and a betrayal of the American people.

Critics have pointed out that this discriminatory practice is not only unethical but likely illegal. By refusing to provide the same assistance to American citizens, Hacienda CDC is contravening the very principles of fairness and equity that the EEIP was supposedly created to uphold. This blatant disregard for American citizens is a stark reminder of the Radical Left’s true priorities.

The Radical Left’s war on Americans is not just limited to Oregon. Across the country, Democrats are pushing policies that prioritize non-citizens and undermine the well-being of American families. From the southern border to the housing market, the Left’s anti-American agenda is clear: they want to remake this country in their image, with little regard for the people who call it home.

It is time for Americans to stand up and say, “Enough is enough!” Our tax dollars should not be used to fund programs that discriminate against us in favor of non-citizens. Our elected officials should be working to protect and promote the interests of American citizens, not undermining them at every turn. The Radical Left’s dangerous and divisive policies must be stopped before they cause irreparable harm to our nation.

The Hacienda CDC’s taxpayer-funded down payment assistance scheme is a disgraceful example of how the Radical Left is using our tax dollars to harm American citizens while helping non-citizens.

This anti-American agenda must be exposed and stopped. American citizens deserve better than to be sidelined by the very government that is supposed to protect and serve them.

As Oregonians and Americans, we must demand that our elected officials put America first and end these discriminatory practices. Our tax dollars should be used to support American citizens, not to fund the Left’s dangerous and divisive social engineering experiments.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Since allowing a sniper to take an obvious angle on a former president during a rally, the Secret Service has been under mass scrutiny. But now, this newest development is major.

And the Secret Service has made a shocking decision following a massive investigation.

The attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump at a Butler, Pennsylvania rally on July 13, 2024, has sent shockwaves through the nation, raising serious questions about the ability of the United States Secret Service (USSS) to protect those entrusted to their care.

In the aftermath of this harrowing event, several Secret Service agents have been placed on administrative leave, an acknowledgment that the agency failed in its most fundamental duty: safeguarding the life of a former president and current GOP presidential nominee.

According to a report from Real Clear Politics, multiple sources have confirmed that several members of the USSS Pittsburgh Field Office have been removed from their posts following the shooting.

This decision, while necessary, underscores a troubling reality: the Secret Service, once seen as an unbreakable shield for America’s most important leaders, has faltered in its mission at a critical moment.

The incident at the Butler rally was not just a close call—it was a catastrophic failure that could have resulted in the loss of one of the most influential figures in American politics. Thomas Matthew Crooks, the would-be assassin, managed to evade security, position himself on a rooftop, and open fire on the crowd and President Trump.

Although the former president was struck in the ear, miraculously escaping a fatal injury, the consequences for others were dire. Corey Comperatore, a brave attendee, was fatally wounded as he shielded his wife and daughters from the hail of bullets. Two other men were critically injured but survived.

This tragic event should serve as a stark reminder of the grave responsibilities that come with protecting a former president. The Secret Service, an agency with a storied history of protecting American leaders, has found itself in a position of public scrutiny, with its failures laid bare for all to see.

In the wake of this disaster, the Secret Service has seen significant upheaval. Former USSS Director Kimberly Cheatle, who was at the helm during the Butler rally, resigned from her position following the incident.

While her departure is a step toward accountability, it raises the question of how such a failure could have occurred under her leadership. Acting USSS Director Ronald Rowe has since taken over, but he now faces the daunting task of restoring confidence in an agency that has been deeply shaken.

Rowe’s candid testimony before the Senate on July 30 offered a glimpse into the extent of the failures that led to the near-tragedy. In his opening remarks, Rowe recounted his visit to the roof of the AGR building, from where Crooks had fired the shots. “What I saw made me ashamed,” Rowe admitted.

“As a career law enforcement officer, and a 25-year veteran with the Secret Service, I cannot defend why that roof was not better secured.” These words reflect a sobering reality: the Secret Service was not prepared for the level of threat it faced that day.

One of the most damning admissions from Rowe’s testimony was his acknowledgment that the assassination attempt was a “failure of imagination.” He described it as a failure to recognize that “we actually do live in a very dangerous world where people do actually want to do harm to our protectees.” This failure was compounded by the agency’s reliance on assumptions—that their security partners would cover all bases and that their own procedures were foolproof.

But in a world where threats are evolving and becoming more sophisticated, such complacency is unacceptable. The Secret Service, an agency with the highest of standards, cannot afford to rest on its laurels.

The attempt on President Trump’s life is a sobering reminder that the stakes are always high, and the margin for error is nonexistent.

The protection of a former president is not just a matter of routine security—it is a sacred duty that reflects the values and stability of the United States. When the Secret Service fails in this duty, it is not just a failure of an agency, but a failure of the nation to uphold the safety and dignity of its leaders.

Donald Trump, a former president and current GOP nominee, represents a significant figure in American politics. The idea that someone could so easily breach his security is a chilling thought that should alarm every American.

The Secret Service has long been held to the highest standards, but the Butler rally incident has revealed cracks in what was once seen as an impenetrable defense. The agency must now undergo a thorough review of its practices and protocols to ensure that such a failure never happens again.

Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) was right to grill Acting Director Rowe during the Senate hearing, demanding answers and accountability. The American people deserve to know how such a failure could have occurred and what steps will be taken to prevent it from happening in the future. Rowe’s promise that “people will be held accountable” is a start, but it must be followed by concrete actions that address the systemic issues within the agency.

Protecting the life of a former president is not just a job—it is a solemn responsibility that requires the utmost dedication, vigilance, and professionalism. The Secret Service must rise to the occasion and restore the trust that has been shaken by this event. Anything less would be a disservice to the American people and the leaders they entrust with the nation’s highest offices.

Donald Trump is not just any former president—he is a leader who has left an indelible mark on the American political landscape. His policies, his approach to governance, and his unwavering commitment to putting America first have earned him a place in history. Protecting a leader of his stature is not just a matter of duty—it is a matter of preserving the values and principles that he represents.

As the nation moves forward, the Secret Service must learn from its mistakes and recommit itself to its mission. The American people deserve to know that their leaders are safe, and that the men and women tasked with protecting them are up to the challenge. The attempted assassination of Donald Trump was a wake-up call—now it’s time for the Secret Service to answer it.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Tim Walz’s short campaign has already been a disaster. And things are only getting worse for him.

Because now, a massive group of Senators and Representatives have joined together to speak out against Walz.

The office of the Vice President of the United States demands the highest level of integrity, honor, and trust. However, the recent revelations about Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’s choice for Vice President, have cast a dark shadow over the 2024 election.

Walz’s false claims about his military service have sparked widespread outrage, particularly among veterans who have served this country with distinction. Their disgust is palpable, as they demand accountability for what they see as a blatant act of stolen valor—a betrayal of the very principles that define military service.

On Tuesday, 50 veterans who now serve in the U.S. Congress, representing both the House and the Senate, expressed their deep concern over Walz’s deceitful claims. I

n a letter addressed to Walz, these veterans, who have worn the uniform and served their country with honor, did not mince words. They highlighted the gravity of Walz’s actions, stressing that his lies undermine the trust required for the office of Vice President and insult the sacrifices made by countless servicemembers.

“The Office of the Vice President is a position that requires the trust of the American people and a solemn commitment to duty on behalf of the United States of America,” the letter begins. “As veterans who have served our nation, we feel compelled to address your egregious misrepresentations and urge you to come clean to the American people.”

These words echo the sentiments of millions of Americans who hold military service in the highest regard. The veterans’ message is clear: there is no honor in lying about one’s military record.

By falsely claiming to be a “Retired Command Sergeant Major” and exaggerating his experiences, Walz has not only disrespected the uniform but has also betrayed the trust of those who have served under him and those who continue to serve this great nation.

Stolen valor is not just a lie; it’s a deeply offensive act that tarnishes the legacy of every American who has served in uniform. For those who have put their lives on the line, endured the hardships of military life, and sacrificed so much, the idea that someone would falsely claim their experiences for personal gain is nothing short of horrific.

Walz’s claims are not just a simple embellishment—they are a gross misrepresentation of his service. According to the veterans’ letter, Walz repeatedly referred to himself as a “Retired Command Sergeant Major,” a title he never earned.

He also claimed to have carried weapons in war, despite never having served in combat. Perhaps most egregiously, Walz abandoned his post just as his unit was preparing to deploy to Iraq, choosing instead to run for Congress.

The men under his command went to war without him, and some did not return home. For this, Walz was demoted from Command Sergeant Major to Master Sergeant.

The veterans’ letter pulls no punches: “To be blunt, when you falsely claim military service that did not happen and abandon your post, you diminish the real sacrifices made by veterans who did serve in combat. Military service is not merely a job or a uniform.

Those who serve in the Armed Forces endure rigorous training, face perilous situations, and make sacrifices that most civilians can’t comprehend. The honor of wearing the uniform is earned through dedication, bravery, and an unwavering sense of duty.

You have displayed none of these characteristics as you have lied your way through a political career launched on the foundation of a title you did not earn and combat deployments you did not take part in.”

The implications of Walz’s deceit go beyond his personal honor. The Vice President is one heartbeat away from the Presidency, a role that requires not just leadership but also the trust of the American people and the military.

Walz’s actions raise serious concerns about his ability to fulfill these duties. If he cannot be honest about his own record of service, how can the American people trust him to lead the nation?

The veterans’ letter addresses this directly: “In short, our grave concern stems from the fact that the office of the Vice President is one heartbeat away from becoming the Commander-In-Chief. You’ve already demonstrated your unwillingness to lead in time of war and a lack of honor through your blatant misrepresentations exploiting and co-opting the experiences of America’s combat veterans for personal gain.”

For the veterans who signed the letter, and for the broader military community, Walz’s actions are not just a personal failing—they are a threat to the integrity of the office he seeks. The men and women who serve this country deserve a leader who understands the gravity of their sacrifices, not someone who has lied about their own service to advance their political career.

The list of veterans who have signed the letter is a testament to the broad and bipartisan disgust with Walz’s actions. These are men and women who have served in every branch of the military, from the Army to the Navy, Air Force, Marines, and Coast Guard.

They have held ranks from Staff Sergeant to Lieutenant Colonel, and many have seen combat, led troops, and made the difficult decisions that define military leadership.

Brian Mast (FL-21), Staff Sergeant, U.S. Army (Ret.), Chair of Veterans and Military Families for Trump
Joni Ernst (IA), Lieutenant Colonel, Army National Guard (Ret.)
Roger Marshall (KS), Captain, U.S. Army Reserve (Ret.)
Rick Scott (FL), Petty Officer Third Class, U.S. Navy (Ret.)
Roger Wicker (MS), Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Air Force Reserve (Ret.)

And many more. These veterans represent a cross-section of America’s military leadership, and their unified stand against Walz speaks volumes about the seriousness of his offenses.

As the 2024 election approaches, the American people are faced with a choice. Do they want leaders who have lied about their military service, who have abandoned their posts in times of need, and who have betrayed the trust of those they were sworn to lead? Or do they want leaders who have served with honor, who understand the sacrifices of military service, and who can be trusted to lead the nation with integrity?

The disgust with Walz’s actions is not just a political issue—it’s a moral one. Stolen valor is an affront to every American who has worn the uniform. The veterans who have spoken out against Walz are right to demand accountability, and the American people should join them in rejecting a candidate who has shown himself to be unworthy of their trust.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Kamala Harris pretends like she isn’t Radical. But the truth is now out for all to see.

And Harris has exposed her true colors with this recent endorsement.

Kamala Harris has once again revealed her true colors with her latest endorsement of Joe Biden’s Fiscal Year 2025 budget proposal, which calls for a massive increase in taxes on capital gains.

This radical proposal could see Americans forced to give up nearly half of their profits on the sale of assets like homes, an alarming move that threatens to stifle economic growth and penalize hardworking Americans who are simply trying to build a secure financial future for themselves and their families.

This isn’t just a minor policy tweak; it’s a full-scale assault on the American Dream. By pushing for a capital gains tax rate of up to 44.6 percent, Harris is demonstrating a shocking disregard for the economic well-being of millions of Americans. This plan is not just unfair—it’s downright dangerous.

Under the Biden-Harris proposal, long-term capital gains could be taxed at a rate of up to 44.6 percent, a drastic increase from the current maximum rate of 20 percent. This represents more than a 100 percent hike in taxes on capital gains, a move that would disproportionately affect those who have worked hard to invest in assets like real estate, stocks, and small businesses.

Any asset held for over a year and sold for a gain could be subject to this exorbitant tax rate, leaving millions of Americans facing the prospect of handing over nearly half of their profits to the government.

This is a far cry from the current tax structure, where individuals making under $492,000 per year are taxed at just 15 percent on long-term capital gains. The proposed plan would completely upend this system, hitting everyday Americans with a tax burden that is not only excessive but potentially crippling.

The justification for this drastic increase? According to Harris, it’s about making the wealthy pay their “fair share.” But in reality, this proposal is a thinly veiled attempt to redistribute wealth and impose punitive taxes on those who have managed to achieve some level of financial success.

By shifting the capital gains tax rate to mirror the income tax rate for wealthy Americans, Harris is effectively punishing success and disincentivizing investment—a move that could have disastrous consequences for the economy as a whole.

The dangers of Harris’s capital gains tax plan extend far beyond the immediate impact on those who sell assets for a profit. The proposal also includes an increase in the general net investment income tax rate to five percent, along with a hike in the top tax bracket rate to 39.6 percent.

These measures, which Harris fully supports, would further burden those who are already paying a significant share of their income in taxes.

But perhaps even more concerning is the proposal’s potential to harm everyday investors and the broader economy. The plan includes a 25 percent wealth tax on those with more than $100 million in assets—a measure that might sound like it only affects the ultra-wealthy, but could actually have far-reaching consequences for millions of Americans.

If the owner of a publicly traded company is forced to sell off a large portion of their shares to meet their tax obligations, the value of the company could plummet, dragging down the stock price and harming the retirement savings of ordinary investors.

This could create a ripple effect throughout the economy, destabilizing asset and capital markets and potentially leading to a broader economic downturn.

Richard Shinder, a contributor at The Hill, warned of these very dangers when Biden first proposed the wealth tax. He pointed out that “asset-rich, cash-poor” taxpayers might be forced to sell assets to meet their tax obligations, risking a destabilization of the very markets that so many Americans rely on for their financial security.

Shinder also highlighted the potential for abuse in administering such a tax, as IRS officials would have a structural incentive to overestimate asset values in order to maximize tax revenue. This could lead to an environment ripe for corruption and abuse, further undermining trust in the government and the fairness of the tax system.

As if the capital gains tax hike and wealth tax weren’t enough, Harris is also reportedly considering lowering the threshold for the estate, or “death,” tax. Currently, this threshold stands at $13.61 million for a single filer, but under Harris’s watch, it could be drastically reduced, subjecting even more Americans to this punitive tax.

The estate tax is one of the most unfair taxes in the U.S. tax code, as it forces families to pay a hefty tax bill on the assets they inherit from their loved ones. For many families, this means selling off family businesses, farms, or other valuable assets just to pay the tax—a heartbreaking outcome that destroys the legacy of hard work and sacrifice left by previous generations.

Tax and trust attorney David Brillant recently told Yahoo Finance that if Kamala Harris wins in 2024, capital gains and estate tax rates will likely increase significantly. This is a clear warning to American families: if Harris and the Democrats have their way, the government will take a bigger and bigger share of the wealth you’ve worked so hard to build and pass on to your children.

Harris’s support for these draconian tax measures is just the latest example of the Democrats’ broader assault on economic freedom and prosperity. From price controls to inflationary spending, the Biden-Harris administration has consistently pushed policies that hurt the very people they claim to protect.

These latest tax proposals are no different—they represent a fundamental misunderstanding of what drives economic growth and prosperity in America.

Instead of encouraging investment, innovation, and entrepreneurship, Harris and her fellow Democrats are focused on punishing success and redistributing wealth. This approach is not only economically disastrous, but it also undermines the very principles of fairness and opportunity that have made America the land of opportunity.

As we head into the 2024 election, the choice before the American people could not be clearer. On one side, we have Kamala Harris and the Democrats, who are intent on raising taxes, punishing success, and stifling economic growth.

On the other side, we have leaders like Donald Trump who understand that the key to a strong economy is not more government control, but more freedom and opportunity for all Americans.

The Biden-Harris administration’s reckless tax proposals are a clear reminder of the stakes in this election.

If Harris and the Democrats have their way, American families will be forced to give up more and more of their hard-earned wealth to a government that seems determined to make it harder for them to achieve the American Dream. It’s time to say enough is enough.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris love to lie to the American people. But some lies are more harmful than others.

And the Biden administration was just caught in a massive lie that could impact us all.

The Biden-Harris administration has spent the past few years peddling a narrative of robust economic growth, often boasting about the supposed success of their policies in revitalizing the American job market.

However, the truth is now beginning to surface, and it paints a far less rosy picture than what Kamala Harris and Joe Biden would have you believe.

According to new estimates from leading economists, the U.S. job growth figures for 2024 could be drastically revised downward, potentially slashing as many as one million jobs from the totals previously reported by the Biden-Harris administration.

This revelation is not just a minor adjustment—it’s a staggering correction that exposes the falsehoods at the heart of the Biden-Harris economic narrative.

For months, Kamala Harris has been bragging about the growth of the economy under their administration, but these new figures suggest that the so-called “Biden boom” was little more than a mirage, a misleading illusion designed to deceive the American public.

Economists from some of the nation’s most respected financial institutions are now predicting that the U.S. government’s preliminary benchmark revisions, set to be released on Wednesday, will reveal a massive overstatement in job growth.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Wells Fargo & Co. estimate that the payroll growth through March 2024 could be at least 600,000 weaker than originally reported, with Goldman Sachs suggesting that the true number could be closer to one million.

Even the more conservative estimates from JPMorgan Chase & Co. indicate a decline of at least 360,000 jobs. These revisions, if accurate, would represent the largest downward adjustment in 15 years and would suggest that the U.S. labor market has been cooling for much longer—and more significantly—than the Biden-Harris administration has been willing to admit.

Wells Fargo economists Sarah House and Aubrey Woessner noted in a recent report that such a large negative revision would indicate that the strength of hiring was already fading well before this past April. This revelation directly contradicts the narrative pushed by the Biden-Harris administration and raises serious questions about their economic stewardship.

Kamala Harris has been one of the most vocal proponents of the Biden-Harris economic agenda, frequently taking to social media to tout what she claims are impressive job growth numbers.

In February, she posted on Facebook, “We have more work to do, but it’s clear: America’s economy is strong and getting stronger.” However, these latest estimates reveal that her boasts were premature, if not outright misleading.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) currently claims that 2.9 million jobs were added in the year ending in March 2024, with an average monthly increase of 242,000.

However, if the revised numbers slash one million jobs from the total, the monthly gains would drop to an average of just 158,000—a far cry from the robust growth that Harris has been claiming.

While still a positive number, this level of job creation represents a significant moderation from the post-pandemic peak and suggests that the U.S. economy is far from the powerhouse that the Biden-Harris administration has portrayed.

The market’s reaction to these disappointing job numbers further underscores the fragility of the so-called economic recovery under Biden and Harris. The July jobs report, released in August, showed unemployment rising to 4.3 percent, with only 114,000 jobs added—well below the predicted 185,000 estimated by Dow Jones.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average responded by plummeting 832 points, a clear indication that investors are losing confidence in the Biden-Harris administration’s ability to manage the economy.

What’s more, a third of the jobs added in June were in the government sector, a sign that the private sector—the true engine of economic growth—may be struggling under the weight of the Biden-Harris administration’s burdensome regulations and anti-business policies. This reliance on government job creation is not sustainable and does nothing to address the long-term economic challenges facing the nation.

In stark contrast to the Biden-Harris administration’s failure to deliver on their promises, Donald Trump has a proven record of economic success. During his time in office, Trump presided over one of the most prosperous periods in recent U.S. history, with record-low unemployment, rising wages, and robust job growth across all sectors of the economy.

Trump’s policies of tax cuts, deregulation, and support for American businesses created an environment where the private sector could thrive, leading to unprecedented economic growth.

Trump’s approach stands in sharp contrast to the heavy-handed, big-government tactics of Biden and Harris, which have stifled innovation, burdened businesses with unnecessary regulations, and left millions of Americans struggling to make ends meet.

As the 2024 election approaches, voters have a clear choice: continue down the path of economic stagnation and false promises with Biden and Harris, or return to the proven, pro-growth policies of Donald Trump.

The truth is that the U.S. economy is not as strong as Biden and Harris would like us to believe. Job growth has been far weaker than they have claimed, and the labor market has been cooling for much longer than they have admitted.

This administration has failed to deliver on its promises, and the American people are paying the price.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics where we bring you the TRUTH in the news.