Home Blog Page 56

Dangerous woke AI is spreading information so false and harmful it makes CNN look tame

0

Fake news and misinformation is something the Left is amazing at. But now things have been taken to a terrifying level.

And dangerous woke AI is spreading misinformation so false and harmful it makes CNN look mild.

The spread of misinformation by the Left has been a dangerous trend that has been increasing in momentum recently.

And with the rise of AI, things are only going to get worse.

Most recently, users discovered the infamously “woke” tool of the Radical Left, Google Gemini, has been spreading shocking lies about conservatives.

The bias against conservatives can be felt in almost every single conversation, and a line has certainly been crossed.

One such horrifying example is when users ask Gemini if there are differences between Hitler and conservative figures such as politicians or journalists.

One such instance shows Gemini struggling to make a distinction between Hitler and Chris Rufo.

Other examples show Gemini unable to distinguish between joke social media accounts and Stalin who ended the lives of over 9 million people.

Other users have taken to X to show examples of Gemini being unable to say who was worse, Jesus or Hitler:

The Liberal bias comes through clearly when introducing Democrat and Leftist figures.

When asking the same type of question, Gemini says it is “inappropriate” to compare Hitler and Obama, but comparing Elon Musk and Hitler is “complex” and “requires careful consideration.”

Gemini also refused to admit that an “adult human female” is a woman and other outrageous examples.

In a time when the Radical Left seems so focused on silencing the voice of truth among conservatives, they are perfectly content to let AI spread false news that is extremely harmful.

The Radical Left continues to use tools such as Gemini and other AI to twist the truth and push their narrative on the public.

We cannot sit back idly and allow this to continue any longer.

We must address this severe issue now before it is too late.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politic.s

Shocking development in Fani Willis case has experts stunned

0

The situation in Fulton County has been escalating over the past few weeks. But things just took a massive turn.

And a shocking development in the Fani Willis case has experts stunned.

This past Friday, a bombshell report was dropped that completely contradicts what Fani Willis and Nathan Wade have been swearing under oath.

The report shows that Willis and Wade had met dozens of times at Willis’ home before he was hired for the case.

However, Willis and Wade have both testified the exact opposite and claimed that they did not spend time at Willis’ house at that their romantic relationship did not begin until after Wade was hired.

Both Wade and Willis also claimed they never spent a night together at Willis’ home, however, cell data shows Wade came to her home late at night and left the next morning on at least two occasions.

Journalist Megyn Kelly said, “Stunning that Team Trump got their hands on this in the #FaniWillis case,” in her response to the discovery.

She added, “More evidence that these two prosecutors lied, under oath. They’re looking at perjury charges and worse. Discipline from the Bar. And there is zero chance they can stay on this case. It’s DONE.”

Another major figure, Phil Holloway who is an attorney and legal analyst, also commented on the report.

He said, “It’s not how many times Wade ‘visited’ #FaniWillis, it’s that they both testified he ‘never spent the night[.]’ ‘his phone left the East Cobb area just after midnight and arrived [at] the Dogwood address at 12:43 A.M on November 30, 2021. The phone remained there until 4:55 am.”

Holloway wrote on X, “Is this wordplay and semantics? Or is this perjury? At worst it’s perjury, at best the testimony is misleading.”

“Either way the judge would be justified to find this to be part of a fraud on the court. This is very dangerous legal territory for these two,” he added. “They just keep digging.”

Another legal expert, Jonathan Turley, said, “We are still awaiting a response from Willis so this is only one side. However, it could put Willis’s combative testimony into sharp relief as she declared ‘It’s a lie. It’s a lie‘ on the stand.”

“If the court believes that Willis and Wade lied on the stand, he could refer the matter for possible prosecution…by some other office. He could also consider a referral to the bar. Once again, the insistence on Willis and Wade that they remain in the case is troubling,” he added.

The reality of the situation seems grim for Fani Willis and her legal case.

She has been clearly caught in a massive lie and should be at the very least disqualified immediately.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

New Democrat election interference is so blatant they can’t even hide it

0

Democrats love to claim that conservatives have engaged in election interference. But the tables have been turned.

And the Democrats’ election interference is so blatant they can’t even hide it.

Donald Trump is the clear favorite for the 2024 Presidential election.

However, Democrats across the nation are doing everything they can to oppose him and threaten America.

And now, many House Democrats have indicated that they would refuse to certify a 2024 election win from Trump because he is an “insurrectionist.”

They claim that the 14th Amendment would therefore cause Trump to be “ineligible” and thus would refuse to certify a win from him.

Some of these Democrat representatives include James Clyburn, Jamie Raskin, Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, and even House Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies.

When asked if they would confirm Trump if elected in 2024, they refused to answer which is a clear as any words they could have uttered.

Democrats would have the votes to “sustain an objection to Trump” if they take the House.

Dan McLaughlin at National Review explained, “Only a simple majority is required, and unlike when the House chooses a president under the Twelfth Amendment, they don’t vote by states.”

He wrote that “unlike in 2016 or 2004, when they were in the minority, House Democrats could be playing with live ammunition.”

Thankfully, for there to be much impact at all, a majority of Senators would have to object to Trump’s win.

That would require likely 51 Senators which would be extremely hard for Democrats to do.

McLaughlin said they “either have to hold every seat they currently occupy (good luck in West Virginia), or take a Republican-held seat (the bluest of which is either Ted Cruz’s in Texas or Rick Scott’s in Florida).”

Many Americans still hold out hope that the Supreme Court could alleviate much of this uncertainty and unrest.

Oral arguments have already been heard in Trump v. Anderson which addresses the situation in Colorado where the state is attempting to keep Trump off the ballot.

If the Supreme Court is able to clarify the language of the 14th Amendment in their ruling, then there would be no chance of the Democrats being able to not certify a Trump win.

The oral arguments went well with almost every expert agreeing that things are going favorably for Trump.

Even the liberal justices on the Supreme Court do not seem to want to side with Colorado.

Justice Kagan even said, “The question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be President of the United States.”

She continued and said, “It sounds awfully national to me … if you weren’t from Colorado, and you were from Wisconsin, or you were from Michigan, and what the Michigan secretary of state did is going to make the difference between whether candidate A is elected over Candidate B is elected? I mean that seems quite extraordinary.”

However, the Radical Left seems so stuck on opposing Trump that they are willing to admit to election fraud.

The hypocrisy is so shocking that Americans are speechless.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more updates on this story and more.

Liberal squad member spreads disgusting fake news that is harming Americans

0

The Radical Left loves to spread their harmful lies in order to push their agenda. But now things have been taken too far.

Because this liberal squad member has spread disgusting fake news that is harming Americans.

On Friday, during an interview on MSNBC, squad member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez claimed that the crisis at the border was a “false narrative.”

In the interview with Alex Wagner, AOC even went so far as to claim that the crisis was created by “xenophobic” Republicans.

She said, “The idea that Republicans, in order to win an election, say we need to hermetically seal the border when they know that that would be— that is economic self-sabotage to the US economy, and they are saying let’s do it anyway.”

She went on saying, “And to compensate for the negative effects we’re gonna allow and throw people’s kids into factories.”

She concluded by claiming “That is what they are doing in rolling back child-labor laws while being as xenophobic and anti-immigrant as they are, and while ginning up this, this false narrative about this being a crisis.”

So not only is AOC lying to the American people, she is claiming that the unbelievably horrible situation on the southern border is just some conspiracy made up by Republicans.

She said about Republicans: “We’re going to keep pretending this is a crisis while contributing to actual problems.”

“And then we’re going to block the solution so that we can campaign on it over and over and over,” she added.

She claimed that Republicans were using the border crisis to create, “animosity and destruction in this country, and racism in this country.”

She claimed, “That’s the only thing that the Republican Party even is standing on at this point.”

So AOC and the Radical Left, who claim to be all for defeating fake news and all about accepting everyone, are now resorting to calling Republicans xenophobes and claiming they made up the border crisis.

The idea is laughable since the entire crisis at the border is statics that cannot be argued with.

Joe Biden has singlehandedly destroyed any security this nation used to have, and he has outdone everything Donald Trump did to address the border.

Since Joe Biden has been president, there have been over 7.3 million encounters with illegal immigrants by CBP agents.

Additionally, 2,475,699 of those encounters were in 2023 which is a record.

The truth of the matter is this:

The situation at the southern border is out of hand and Democrats know this.

They also know that Americans are frustrated and are not supporting Democrats.

So the Radical Left has decided that the only solution is to spread lies about Republicans and do their best to blame Republicans for everything.

But no one is buying it… the American people know what is going on and we will fight back against the lies of the Radical Left.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Top presidential candidate receives major blow that could end everything

0

Funding plays a major part in every politician’s career. It has the ability to make or break it.

And now, a top presidential candidate has received a devastating blow to funding that could end it all.

Americans For Prosperity Action, a major conservative organization, has been backing Nikki Haley throughout her run for President.

However, recently the organization made the decision to stop their financial support for Haley’s presidential campaign.

In an internal email obtained by Politico, the Americans For Prosperity CEO, Emily Seidel, said that their political branch, AFP Action, needed to re-evaluate priorities.

She claimed that they needed to “take stock” of their expenditure priorities after Haley was soundly defeated in her home state of South Carolina.

Seidel went on to say that the group would be more focused on close/competitive Senate and House races in the coming weeks and months.

Seidel claimed that they supported Haley’s attitude towards her uphill battle, but emphasized that they saw no way of her winning.

“She has made it clear that she will continue to fight and we wholeheartedly support her in this effort,” Seidel wrote in the email.

“But given the challenges in the primary states ahead, we don’t believe any outside group can make a material difference to widen her path to victory,” she added.

Before the presidential primaries took place, AFP Action was spending resources on advertising campaigns to encourage Republicans to support candidates other than Trump.

Throughout the past year, they spent time on the ground as well trying to persuade Republicans that Trump was not the candidate that they should support.

It was only in late November of last year, however, that the group officially endorsed Nikki Haley over Trump.

AFP has already invested millions of dollars in advertising for Nikki Haley, but even they seem to understand that there is no way forward for her.

Haley has suffered defeat after defeat in every state in the primaries so far.

And most recently, Haley was beaten badly by Donald Trump in her own home state by a margin of 20 points.

Political investors and organizations, the media, and millions of Americans understand that Donald Trump is going to be the Republican candidate for President.

There is no way for Nikki Haley to defeat him, and now more than ever she has less of a chance as a major organization has made it clear they will not be funding her any longer.

Many people wonder why Haley has even remained in the race this long as she seems to be doing nothing but splitting the Republican vote.

After his win in South Carolina, Trump delivered a speech on the importance of unity among Americans, especially among Conservatives and Republicans.

We cannot defeat the Radical Left unless we pool our resources and get behind a leader who can oppose them.

Time has shown that Trump will be the Republican nominee, and we cannot continue splitting the American people.

We must work together to take down the Left.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

GOP leaders issue one order over Biden admin’s attempts to silence free speech

0

Joe Biden and the Radical Left do everything they can to silence the truth and control the narrative. But people are fighting back.

And now GOP leaders have issued one order over the Biden admin’s attempts at silencing free speech.

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is facing scrutiny from Senate Republicans over its funding of research projects aimed at combating alleged “misinformation.”

Senator Eric Schmitt (R-MO) has requested a comprehensive list of projects funded through the NSF Convergence Accelerator Track F program, which has awarded tens of millions of dollars to research efforts focused on “mis- and disinformation.”

Schmitt, in a letter to NSF Director Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan, expressed concerns about the program’s potential impact on freedom of speech.

“To say that NSF’s reported involvement in funding research projects aimed at developing AI tools for identifying and combating alleged misinformation is un-American would be an understatement,” Schmitt wrote.

He characterized the initiative as an attempt by the Biden administration and the NSF to “silence those who eschew the thoughts and ideals of the political Left” and accused them of colluding with Big Tech.

This request follows a report by the House Judiciary Committee raising similar questions about the NSF program.

The report alleged that the funded projects aim to develop AI-powered tools for censorship and propaganda, potentially used to restrict certain viewpoints.

“The purpose of these taxpayer-funded projects is to develop artificial intelligence (AI)- powered censorship and propaganda tools that can be used by governments and Big Tech to shape public opinion by restricting certain viewpoints or promoting others,” it said.

The article mentions Syracuse University receiving nearly $500,000 to study how misinformation is woven into online narratives and how design might alter it.

Additionally, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology received $750,000 for research on online truth discernment, with a researcher acknowledging the difficulty for some individuals in sorting fact from fiction online.

This is not the first time the NSF program has faced scrutiny.

House Republicans have already issued subpoenas related to the project.

Additionally, the broader debate surrounding misinformation, fake news, and online content moderation remains complex and highly contested, with concerns about censorship by the Radical Left.

The issue presents a balancing act for the NSF, tasked with supporting research while ensuring it aligns with its mission and doesn’t infringe on protected freedoms.

Schmitt told reporters that “The Biden Administration has shown a stunning disregard for Americans’ freedom of speech online and has gone as far as to coerce social media companies to censor Americans online.”

He added that “with the rapid rise of artificial intelligence in the public and commercial sector, we have a duty to ensure AI is used responsibly and not weaponized against Americans’ constitutional rights.”

We must be vigilant and we must not allow the government to take away our freedoms.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

Ron DeSantis makes a surprising VP announcement

0

With rumors circulating regarding who Trump might pick as his running mate, people are wondering who it will be. But now, this news has made things clear.

Because Ron DeSantis has made a surprising VP announcement.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who dropped out of the 2024 Republican presidential primary in January, continues to navigate the complex political landscape surrounding former President Donald Trump.

In a recent call with supporters, DeSantis offered a mix of criticism and potential future collaboration, while keeping the door open to a 2028 presidential run.

The call, intended to thank backers who volunteered as delegates during his campaign, saw DeSantis caution against “identity politics” in Trump’s vice presidential selection.

DeSantis made it clear that he would not accept a VP position from Donald Trump.

He reportedly expressed concerns about Trump’s “baggage” and the potential negative impact on Republicans in the 2024 election.

Despite distancing himself from Trump, DeSantis hinted at potentially seeking the presidency himself in 2028.

While not making a firm commitment, his statement of “not ruling anything out” opens the door for speculation and future developments.

DeSantis did not shy away from criticizing Trump’s record.

He expressed frustration with the “incumbent race” nature of the primary, suggesting sympathy towards Trump due to legal challenges hindered his campaign.

He further criticized Trump’s perceived failure to deliver on key campaign promises, citing immigration, healthcare, and bureaucracy reform as areas lacking action.

DeSantis expressed worries about holding Trump accountable if he returns to office.

He referenced the lack of media scrutiny towards Trump’s past statements and actions as a potential concern.

The call also saw DeSantis criticize the role of conservative media in the primary, claiming it lacked accountability towards Trump.

He suggested their business model relied on uncritical support, potentially hindering open discussion and criticism.

DeSantis’s comments have sparked various interpretations.

Some see them as a calculated move to distance himself from a potentially risky alliance with Trump while maintaining his position within the Republican party.

Others see them as genuine concerns about Trump’s candidacy and a possible strategic positioning for a future presidential run.

Regardless of interpretation, these comments highlight the complex dynamics within the Republican party as it navigates the 2024 election and beyond.

As the political landscape evolves, DeSantis’s position and future ambitions will remain key points of interest in the months and years to come.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more developments on this story.

GOP receives support from the least likely place after a historic meeting with Trump

0

Typically, unions are extremely Democrat. And their endorsements play a major role in elections.

But now, the GOP received support from the least likely place after a historic meeting with Trump.

The Teamsters, a major labor union with a long history of supporting Democratic candidates, have pledged a $45,000 donation to the Republican National Committee (RNC).

This move marks a significant shift in the union’s political landscape and raises questions about its motivations and potential impact.

The Teamsters, representing over 1.3 million workers across various industries including transportation and logistics, have consistently supported Democratic presidential nominees since Al Gore.

This aligns with the broader labor movement’s tendency to lean Democratic due to the Radical Left claiming to be “for the people.”

However, as we have seen in recent years especially, the Democrats are no longer the party of the people, and working-class Americans have realized that.

The recent pledge follows two meetings between Teamsters representatives and former President Donald Trump.

After the January meeting, Trump expressed optimism about securing an endorsement, which ultimately didn’t materialize.

However, the pledged donation suggests a willingness to engage with the Republican Party.

It’s crucial to analyze the potential reasons behind this apparent shift.

Some speculate that the Teamsters are responding to concerns among their members who favor Trump and Republican policies.

Others suggest it might be a strategic move to gain leverage with both parties on key issues affecting their workers.

Additionally, some believe it reflects a broader trend of unions re-evaluating their political allegiances in a changing political climate.

Teamsters president Sean O’Brien emphasized the union’s focus on “knowing all the options for candidates” and avoiding taking votes “for granted.”

This statement suggests an openness to engaging with both parties to secure the best outcomes for their members.

This development has the potential to impact the broader labor landscape.

If the Teamsters pursue a more bipartisan approach, it could influence other unions to follow suit.

This shift could also impact the political landscape, potentially making it harder for Democrats to rely on unwavering union support.

Whatever happens, the truth is this:

Americans have woken up.

We realize how corrupt the Left is, and we understand that they are putting the people last.

We will not stand for it any longer, and we will support leaders and politicians who will serve the needs of the American people.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Jim Jordan makes a demand that has Biden horrified

0

There have been many investigations into Joe Biden recently. But this new discovery and demand is insane.

And Jim Jordan has made a demand that has Biden horrified.

The House Judiciary Committee, led by Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH), has taken a significant step in escalating its scrutiny of the Biden administration’s handling of unaccompanied alien children (UACs).

On Tuesday, the committee issued a subpoena to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), demanding access to case files of UACs charged with violent crimes.

This action comes after months of what Republicans characterize as an insufficient response to requests for information.

The decision to issue a subpoena reflects Republican concerns about the potential link between UACs and violent crime.

Chairman Jordan’s letter accompanying the subpoena accuses HHS of “mismanagement of placement of unaccompanied alien children” and “woefully inadequate” responses to prior information requests.

He claims that since June 2023, the committee has requested case files for UACs charged with serious crimes, including theft, assault, and murder.

However, according to the letter, HHS responded with “baseless excuses to justify withholding the requested criminal alien files” and provided heavily redacted documents that Jordan argues violate the separation of powers and hinder the committee’s ability to conduct oversight.

Beyond the immediate accusations of inadequate information sharing, the subpoena also highlights concerns about the process of vetting sponsors for UACs.

The letter cites a recent report from the Office of Inspector General that found “substantial gaps in sponsor screening and follow-up,” raising “safety concerns for unaccompanied children.”

This echoes past criticisms of the Flores settlement, which limits the detention of minors to 20 days, forcing their release to sponsors while HHS conducts background checks.

Chairman Jordan emphasizes the committee’s goal of informing potential legislative reforms through its investigation.

He specifically mentions reforming the placement process to ensure secure detention for UACs with criminal charges and enhancing the level of scrutiny applied to both UACs and potential sponsors.

To support this goal, Jordan cites the Supreme Court’s recognition of Congress’s “broad and indispensable” power of oversight.

The HHS has yet to publicly respond to the subpoena.

However, this action follows the House’s recent impeachment of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, which now awaits consideration by the Senate.

Both actions reflect Republican concerns about the Biden administration’s border security policies and the handling of unaccompanied minors.

We must hold our elected officials accountable, and we cannot allow them to continue in their corruption.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

Texas AG makes a bold move against immigration that could change everything

0

The crisis in Texas has left many people in pain and danger. And it seems Texas is fighting a losing battle.

But the Texas AG has made a bold move that could change everything.

On Tuesday, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton cast a spotlight on the already heated topic of immigration, filing a lawsuit against Annunciation House, a Catholic NGO operating in El Paso.

The lawsuit, alleging that the organization facilitates illegal immigration and human smuggling, has ignited a legal battle with far-reaching implications for both parties and the broader debate surrounding the role of NGOs at the U.S.-Mexico border.

Paxton’s accusations are stark.

His office claims Annunciation House, which has served migrants and refugees for over 46 years, has engaged in “legal violations such as facilitating illegal entry to the United States, alien harboring, human smuggling, and operating a stash house.”

They cite public record information as evidence and allege that the organization refused to provide requested documents related to these claims.

The lawsuit, seeking to revoke the organization’s business license and liquidate its assets, carries significant weight.

Annunciation House, however, vehemently denies all allegations, calling the lawsuit “shameful.”

They emphasize their long history of providing hospitality and assistance to those in need, drawing parallels between their work and the activities of schools enrolling migrant children or religious institutions welcoming families.

The organization further argues that Paxton’s actions are politically motivated and aim to stifle their humanitarian efforts.

This legal battle unfolds amidst a surge in border crossings, a highly charged topic with differing approaches.

Texas, under Republican leadership, has vehemently advocated for stricter border security measures and taken legal action against the federal government, which supports the role of NGOs in providing aid to migrants and refugees.

The legal outcome hinges on the evidence presented by both sides and the court’s interpretation of the relevant laws.

Paxton’s accusations need concrete supporting evidence, while Annunciation House must effectively defend its activities and demonstrate compliance with legal requirements.

The court’s decision will likely set precedents regarding the permissible activities of NGOs at the border and the level of scrutiny they face.

Beyond the immediate legal battle, this case has broader implications for the ongoing debate about the humanitarian response to immigration challenges.

It raises crucial questions about the role of government versus non-governmental actors in addressing these complex issues.

Additionally, the case underscores the political polarization surrounding immigration, highlighting the potential for differing approaches to clash in the legal arena.

The outcome of this lawsuit will not only impact the future of Annunciation House but also potentially set precedents that affect the way NGOs operate at the border and the way immigration challenges are addressed in the United States.

We must hold our communities accountable and we must prioritize the needs of the American people.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

New January 6th discovery has completely changed the narrative

0

The January 6th narrative has been controversial from the beginning. And Leftist media has tried to twist the truth every chance they get.

But now, a new January 6th discovery has completely changed the narrative.

The discovery of pipe bombs near the RNC and DNC headquarters on January 6th, 2021, remains a jarring chapter in a day already marked by chaos and controversy.

While these devices never detonated, their presence has cast a long shadow, raising questions about potential threats, the adequacy of security measures, and the effectiveness of the subsequent investigation.

At the center of this enigma stands Kenneth Capolino, former RNC security director, whose firsthand account throws a wrench into the accepted narrative, leaving a trail of unanswered questions that demand further scrutiny.

Capolino’s skepticism centers on the very nature of the bombs themselves.

He describes them as resembling training devices, casting doubt on their intended lethality.

The seemingly odd one-hour timer adds to the confusion, as does the extended period the bomb remained undetected, despite its proximity to a major political organization.

The timeline surrounding the DNC bomb further muddies the waters, with discrepancies existing between Capolino’s account and the official narrative.

Furthermore, Capolino questions the urgency of response, particularly at the DNC, where heightened security measures were in place due to the presence of Kamala Harris.

He expresses bewilderment at the reported delay in discovering the device, despite the presence of bomb-sniffing dogs and the heightened security protocols.

Adding fuel to the fire of suspicion are the conflicting narratives surrounding the suspect and the FBI’s investigation.

While Capolino insists the RNC bomb was planted on January 5th, discrepancies cloud the exact timing of the DNC bomb’s placement.

Additionally, Capolino contradicts the FBI’s initial claim that the suspect couldn’t be identified through cell phone data, raising concerns about the thoroughness of the investigation.

Beyond the immediate questions about the bombs themselves, a shadow hangs over the motives and actions of those involved.

The suspect’s identity remains shrouded in mystery, their intentions unclear.

The FBI’s handling of the investigation also raises eyebrows, particularly in light of the lenient plea deal offered to the individual found with a truck full of weapons near the RNC.

Was this leniency warranted, or does it suggest a deeper, less impartial truth lurking beneath the surface?

Perhaps most concerning is the lack of public awareness surrounding the entire incident.

Capolino expresses dismay at the limited media coverage and the general public’s lack of knowledge about the pipe bombs and the weapons cache.

This lack of transparency fuels speculation and distrust, leaving the public with a gnawing sense of unease and the nagging question: what are we not being told?

Moving forward, a thorough investigation is crucial.

Discrepancies must be addressed, the suspect identified, and the true nature and purpose of the bombs and weapons cache determined.

Additionally, increased transparency from law enforcement agencies is vital to rebuild public trust and ensure a comprehensive understanding of the events.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story.

Governor DeSantis struck fear into the hearts of Democrats with one announcement

0

The truth always terrifies the Left. But this truth could completely expose all of them.

And Governor DeSantis struck fear into the hearts of Democrats with one announcement.

In a recent announcement, Governor Ron DeSantis said that he would be signing a bill into law that could completely unravel the Left.

This new bill would grant the release of the grand jury material from Florida’s 2006 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein.

DeSantis took to X to say, “All files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal activity should be made public.”

He added that “while the federal government continues to stonewall accountability, I’m glad the Legislature has taken action to release the grand jury material from the Florida state case. I will sign the bill into law.”

The legislation would specifically answer why the 2006 grand jury had returned only minimal charges to Epstein.

Later on, in 2008, Epstein plead guilty to other charges including “procuring a person under 18 for prostitution and felony solicitation of prostitution.”

However, Epstein then only received 18 months in jail, but he was released daily for work.

Many Americans have become infuriated with the Left’s attempts to cover for Epstein, and there have been many rumors circulating that leave people with an unpleasant feeling.

DeSantis himself attacked the Biden administration and questioned why they refuse to release the documents and info they have on Epstein.

“Why won’t Biden release the federal government’s Epstein files?” he asked.

Other incidents have caused people to question what is really going on with the Epstein case.

In August 2019, while awaiting trial for federal trafficking charges, Epstein died.
The Daily Wire reports that “New York City’s Chief Medical Examiner Dr. Barbara Sampson ruled in August 2019 that Jeffrey Epstein’s cause of death was suicide by hanging.”

However, a forensic pathologist that the Epstein family hired pushed back on the ruling and said much of the evidence actually supported homicide.

Epstein’s brother, Mark, said “I had no reason to doubt it.”

“He didn’t have any children. Our parents are gone. He would know he didn’t have to worry about me. … so, I respected that as his decision,” he continued.

Mark said that when he met with NYC medical examiners they refused to call it a suicide “because it looked too much like a homicide.”

“So, then the questions became if he didn’t commit suicide, then he was killed, and then who killed him? How was it done?” Mark asked.

Americans are hoping that DeSantis’s new bill will help uncover more of the truth and will force the Biden administration to release the documents and information they have on Epstein.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.