Home Blog Page 61

House GOP leaders win massive victory and expose top Democrats’ election scheme

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
House GOP leaders win massive victory and expose top Democrats’ election scheme

The radical Left continues to point fingers at conservatives for voting anomalies. But new evidence proves the exact opposite.

And House GOP leaders have won a massive victory and exposed top Democrats’ election scheme.

In a bold move, 15 Biden Cabinet officials have been issued subpoenas by the House GOP, demanding documents related to a suspected voter mobilization “scheme” linked to an executive order from the Biden White House in 2021.

The subpoenas, spearheaded by Rep. Bryan Steil (R-WI), Chairman of the Committee on House Administration, highlight growing concerns about the administration’s potential overreach and partisan manipulation of federal resources.

The executive order in question, titled “Promoting Access to Voting,” was issued with the intent to bolster voter participation and ensure equal access to voting across various jurisdictions.

According to the order, “Executive departments and agencies should partner with State, local, Tribal, and territorial election officials to protect and promote the exercise of the right to vote, eliminate discrimination and other barriers to voting, and expand access to voter registration and accurate election information.”

Despite these ostensibly noble goals, Senate Republicans have raised alarms about the order, labeling it as a federal “voter mobilization” effort with “potentially partisan impacts.”

The order’s implementation has drawn scrutiny, particularly regarding its alignment with the provisions of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) of 1993.

In his subpoena letter, Steil articulated these concerns, emphasizing the potential misuse of federal resources for partisan gains. “The Committee has concerns about the implementation of E.O. 14019, particularly regarding its compatibility with provisions of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) of 1993,” Steil wrote.

He further criticized the use of federal funds and resources by agencies like the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to promote voter registration, stating, “Congress delegates to federal agencies specific functions and missions, which by law they are required to follow. Congress’s delegation of authority to HUD does not include using funds and resources to provide Americans with voter registration materials.”

The executive order mandates that every federal agency submit a strategic plan outlining how it can promote voter registration and participation.

Steil pointed out specific actions taken by federal agencies that he believes were likely part of these strategic plans.

For instance, the Department of Education’s new federal work-study requirements and the Small Business Administration’s voter registration agreement with Michigan have both been cited as examples of potentially partisan activities.

“Both of those actions and the actions of other agencies raise substantial questions and concerns, some of which may be answered by access to the strategic plans drafted by the agencies,” Steil added.

The House committee is now considering legislation to repeal the executive order, underscoring the gravity of the issue.

The subpoena list includes a wide array of federal departments: Commerce, Defense, Homeland Security, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Justice, Interior, Labor, Office of Management and Budget, Housing and Urban Development, State, Transportation, Treasury, and Agriculture.

In a statement to Fox News, Steil did not mince words. “This executive order is another attempt by the Biden administration to tilt the scales ahead of 2024. I will continue working to provide transparency and accountability on this administration’s latest scheme as Congress did not appropriate taxpayer funds for partisan activities,” he said.

Steil characterized the order as a “scheme” designed to execute “partisan activities” without congressional approval. He stressed the importance of non-partisan election administration, stating, “Elections are partisan, but our election administration should never be partisan. Allowing federal employees from the Biden administration to flood election administration sites threatens election integrity and reduces Americans’ confidence.”

The GOP’s move to subpoena these documents signals a significant escalation in their efforts to hold the Biden administration accountable.

The implications of this investigation could be far-reaching, potentially uncovering misuse of federal resources and partisan meddling in the electoral process.

As the 2024 election looms, the House GOP’s actions highlight the ongoing battle over election integrity and the role of federal agencies in safeguarding — or undermining — democratic processes.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

New proof of Biden tampering with major evidence could completely change his case

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
New proof of Biden tampering with major evidence could completely change his case

The Biden family is willing to do whatever it takes to cover up their corruption. But everyone was shocked when they heard this news.

Because new proof of Biden tampering with major evidence could completely change his case.

In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that Joe Biden’s ghostwriter, Mike Zwonitzer, admitted to deleting audio recordings from interviews with the president.

This action was taken at least partially due to Special Counsel Robert Hur’s investigation into whether Biden mishandled classified documents after his tenure in the Obama administration.

The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project released a transcript on Thursday morning detailing Zwonitzer’s interview with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) last year.

During the interview, Zwonitzer acknowledged that his decision to delete the recordings was influenced by the ongoing investigation, although he claimed that deleting audio files was a routine practice for him.

“The outside observer is going to look at this and say, Mark Zwonitzer, President Biden’s friend, ghostwriter, collaborator learned of the special counsel’s investigation, saw this was happening and then deleted all these audio recordings,” the FBI agent said.

“I just need the truth on this one … That was part of your motivation, at least something you were aware of when you did this?”

“I’m not going to say how much of the percentage it was of my motivation,” Zwonitzer replied.

He admitted he was aware of the investigation and expressed concern about the possibility of being hacked. He worried that the audio could be spread across the internet, particularly due to the “personal stuff and emotional stuff about Beau,” Biden’s late son.

Zwonitzer said that out of an abundance of caution, he “took the audio files subfolder from both the G drive and [his] laptop, and slid them into the trash.”

Zwonitzer further claimed that deleting audio files was a standard practice for him, not just in Biden’s case.

“I generally save transcripts but I haven’t over the years ever saved audios,” he stated.

However, his admission that he deleted the files after becoming aware of the investigation raises significant concerns about the motivations behind his actions.

It has been alleged that Biden may have shared the contents of some classified documents with Zwonitzer during their interviews, potentially breaching national security.

In March, Special Counsel Robert Hur testified that Zwonitzer “tried to destroy the evidence,” adding weight to the allegations against Biden.

This revelation comes at a time when President Biden is already facing mounting criticism over his handling of classified documents and his administration’s transparency.

The fact that his ghostwriter felt compelled to delete audio recordings in light of an investigation only adds to the perception of impropriety and potential cover-up.

Republican lawmakers have seized upon this development, calling for further scrutiny and accountability.

Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH), a vocal critic of the Biden administration, stated, “This is a clear example of the lengths to which the Biden administration and its allies will go to protect themselves from scrutiny. The American people deserve to know the truth about what is in those classified documents and why they were mishandled.”

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) echoed Jordan’s sentiments, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability.

“The deletion of these audio recordings raises serious questions about what the Biden administration is trying to hide. We need a thorough investigation to get to the bottom of this,” Cruz said.

The controversy surrounding Biden’s handling of classified documents and the subsequent deletion of audio recordings by his ghostwriter further undermines the credibility of his administration.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story and more.

U.S. Congresswoman gets attacked by the mob in shocking turn of events

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
U.S. Congresswoman gets attacked by the mob in shocking turn of events

The political polarization in this country has reached a fever pitch. Now no one is safe.

But now, a U.S. Congresswoman got attacked by the mob in a shocking turn of events.

Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) posted a strong condemnation on X against an antisemitic rally organized by the extremist pro-Palestinian group Within Our Lifetime (WOL).

The rally, titled “A Day of Rage for Gaza,” took place in New York City over the weekend, beginning at Union Square and ending at Wall Street, where an exhibit on the Nova Festival massacre — the brutal October 7 attack by Hamas terrorists that claimed the lives of hundreds of innocent Israeli civilians at a music festival — has been displayed since April.

The protest quickly turned unruly, with participants openly supporting terrorism and displaying blatantly antisemitic messages such as “long live October 7” and “the Zionists are not Jews and not humans.”

Some protesters were seen brandishing flags of Hamas’ armed al-Qassam Brigades, a recognized terrorist organization, while others defiantly waved the flags of the Lebanese terrorist group Hezbollah.

The incendiary rally underscored the deep-seated hatred and violent extremism that permeates certain segments of the pro-Palestinian movement.

In her post on X, Ocasio-Cortez stated, “The callousness, dehumanization, and targeting of Jews on display at last night’s protest outside the Nova Festival exhibit was atrocious antisemitism – plain and simple. Antisemitism has no place in our city nor any broader movement that centers human dignity and liberation.”

However, Ocasio-Cortez’s condemnation was met with fierce criticism from within the very movement she was attempting to address.

Nerdeen Kiswani, an organizer for WOL, fired back at the congresswoman, accusing her of being a “genocide apologist” and revealing that Ocasio-Cortez had previously sought to partner with their organization.

“You are a genocide apologist,” Kiswani responded. “This is why when your staff asked WOLPalestine if you can speak at our Queens rally in 2021 we said NO. What’s callous is the Zionist exhibit used to manufacture consent for genocide, but you don’t care since you didn’t vote against funding it.”

This revelation underscores a troubling inconsistency in Ocasio-Cortez’s public stance on issues related to Israel and Palestine.

While she now seeks to condemn antisemitism and distance herself from extremist elements, her previous attempts to align with a group that openly supports terrorism and spreads antisemitic propaganda raises serious questions about her judgment and true intentions.

The incident also highlights a broader issue within the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, where support for Palestinian causes often veers dangerously close to endorsing or excusing outright antisemitism and terrorism.

The fact that a sitting U.S. congresswoman would even consider partnering with a group like WOL speaks volumes about the radical elements that have infiltrated mainstream political discourse.

The backlash from WOL also reveals the deep divisions within the pro-Palestinian movement itself.

While some activists attempt to frame their cause in terms of human rights and liberation, others, like Kiswani, do not shy away from expressing their outright hatred and violent intentions towards Jews and the state of Israel.

In light of these events, it is imperative for political leaders to take a clear and unequivocal stand against antisemitism and to reject any form of alliance or partnership with groups that promote hate and violence.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

Democrats are stunned after Joe Biden was betrayed by his own federal court

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Democrats are stunned after Joe Biden was betrayed by his own federal court

Joe Biden and the radical Left are doing everything they can to win the courts over to their side. But they weren’t prepared for this recent development.

And Democrats are stunned after Joe Biden was betrayed by his own federal court.

In a significant legal victory for America, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced on Tuesday that a federal court has sided with the state in its lawsuit against the Biden administration’s reinterpretation of Title IX.

The court ruling strikes down the administration’s guidance, which had expanded the definition of “s*x” to include “s*xual orientation” and “gender identity,” threatening schools with the loss of federal funding if they maintained facilities and activities based on biological s*x.

The lawsuit, initiated by Paxton in June 2023, targeted the United States Department of Education, led by Secretary Miguel Cardona, and the Department of Justice, under Attorney General Merrick Garland.

Paxton’s suit demanded the court vacate the June 2021 guidance, arguing it was “not in accordance with law” and exceeded statutory authority by applying Title VII interpretations from the Bostock decision to Title IX.

Furthermore, the suit contended that the guidance documents represented substantive or legislative rules requiring notice-and-comment rule making, which had not been conducted.

U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor, presiding over the Northern District of Texas, delivered a 112-page decision firmly rejecting the Biden administration’s interpretation.

O’Connor emphasized that while Title IX prohibits s*x discrimination, it does not explicitly address discrimination based on gender identity.

He clarified that Title IX permits differentiation based on biological s*x for certain purposes, such as maintaining separate intimate facilities and athletic teams, thus allowing schools to treat individuals according to their biological s*x without considering subjective gender identity.

“Because of this prohibition on s*x discrimination, recipients of federal funds generally cannot discriminate based on someone’s s*x. However, nothing in the statute expressly prohibits discrimination based on gender identity or other unexpressed grounds,” O’Connor wrote.

He noted that contemporary dictionaries from the time Title IX was enacted in 1972 defined “s*x” in a strictly binary sense, supporting a biological interpretation.

O’Connor’s ruling underscored the legislative intent behind Title IX, which recognizes inherent biological differences between men and women.

“Title IX explicitly appreciates the innate biological variation between men and women that occasionally warrants differentiation—and even separation—to preserve educational opportunities and to promote respect for both s*xes,” he stated.

He criticized the Biden administration’s guidance for advancing an agenda “wholly divorced from the text, structure, and contemporary context of Title IX.”

The judge also pointed out the practical implications of the guidance, which placed recipients of Title IX funding, including Texas schools, in a precarious position.

Schools faced the dilemma of either complying with the federal guidance and violating state laws or adhering to state laws and risking the loss of substantial federal funding.

“To allow Defendants’ unlawful action to stand would be to functionally rewrite Title IX in a way that shockingly transforms American education and usurps a major question from Congress. That is not how our democratic system functions,” O’Connor concluded.

Attorney General Paxton celebrated the court’s decision as a triumph against federal overreach and a defense of traditional values.

“Joe Biden’s unlawful effort to weaponize Title IX for his extremist agenda has been stopped in its tracks,” Paxton declared.

“Threatening to withhold education funding by forcing states to accept ‘transgender’ policies that put women in danger was plainly illegal. Texas has prevailed on behalf of the entire Nation.”

This ruling is a major setback for the Biden administration’s broader push to force their radical Agenda on Americans across the nation.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Republicans deal historical blow to Biden and it could be the end for his whole family

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Republicans deal historical blow to Biden and it could be the end for his whole family

The corrupt Biden family has escaped justice for a long time. But now, it seems that things might be over for them.

Because Republicans have dealt a historic blow to Joe Biden, and it could be the end for his whole family.

In a historic move, the House of Representatives voted on Wednesday afternoon to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress.

This vote comes in response to Garland’s refusal to hand over the audio recordings of President Joe Biden’s interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur concerning the classified documents investigation.

The resolution passed by a narrow margin, 216 to 207, with one Republican joining 206 Democrats in opposition.

This decision marks a significant escalation in the ongoing battle between the Biden administration and congressional Republicans.

The controversy began in May when President Biden asserted executive privilege over the audio recordings.

White House counsel Ed Siskel emphasized in a letter that the audio lacked a legitimate need to be released and accused congressional Republicans of intending to manipulate the recordings for partisan purposes.

“The absence of a legitimate need for the audio recordings lays bare your likely goal — to chop them up, distort them, and use them for partisan political purposes,” Siskel wrote.

This assertion of executive privilege has been a significant point of contention, with Republicans arguing that transparency is necessary for accountability in the classified documents investigation.

Attorney General Garland has staunchly defended his decision not to release the audio. In early June, he told Congress that providing the audio would “chill cooperation with the department in future investigations.”

Garland argued that releasing the recordings could set a dangerous precedent, deterring witnesses from cooperating with future investigations out of fear that their interviews might be broadcast to the public and Congress.

Garland also highlighted the extensive cooperation his department had already provided. “We went to extraordinary lengths to ensure that the committee gets responses to its legitimate requests for information,” Garland said.

He noted that Special Counsel Hur’s report, transcripts of Biden’s interview, and more than five hours of testimony from Hur had all been made available to Congress.

The House Judiciary and Oversight Committees voted in May to approve a motion to hold Garland in contempt, citing the need for full transparency in the investigation.

Committee members argued that the audio recordings were crucial for understanding the context and tone of Biden’s statements, which could potentially reveal inconsistencies or gaps in the written transcripts.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has been a vocal advocate for obtaining the audio.

“The American people deserve to know the full truth about the President’s involvement in the mishandling of classified documents,” Jordan said. “Attorney General Garland’s refusal to comply with our subpoena undermines the principles of transparency and accountability.”

The vote to hold Garland in contempt is a significant political maneuver, reflecting the deep partisan divisions in Washington.

For many, this move underscores their commitment to holding the Biden administration accountable, particularly in light of what they perceive as a pattern of stonewalling and obfuscation.

“This administration has repeatedly shown that it has something to hide,” said Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), the House Minority Leader.

“By refusing to release the audio, Attorney General Garland is shielding the President from scrutiny. The American people deserve better.”

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Joe Biden’s horrific plan to push out 75% of Americans has been revealed

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Joe Biden’s horrific plan to push out 75% of Americans has been revealed

The radical Left wants nothing more than to destroy America and replace all of its citizens. But no one thought they would actually accomplish this.

But now, Joe Biden’s horrific plan to push out 75% of Americans has been revealed.

A recent report from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) has revealed a startling trend in the U.S. job market:

The majority of job growth since 2019 has gone to both legal and illegal immigrants, leaving many natural-born Americans struggling to find employment.

This new information sheds light on what The New York Times has described as a “historically strong job market,” and provides critical context for the dissatisfaction many voters feel towards President Joe Biden’s handling of the economy.

According to the CIS report, while the country has indeed added millions of jobs since the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, a disproportionate share of that employment growth has benefited immigrants.

This trend highlights a significant shift in the labor market dynamics under the Biden administration, which has overseen a record-breaking surge in illegal immigration.

The CIS analysis references a recent study by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which found that the number of employed natural-born Americans increased by only 971,000 from May 2019 to May 2024.

In stark contrast, the number of employed immigrants rose by 3.2 million during the same period.

This discrepancy raises questions about the prioritization of job opportunities and the economic policies that have been put in place.

A particularly troubling aspect of this trend is the declining labor force participation rate among natural-born Americans, especially men.

The labor force participation rate, which measures the share of people who are either working or actively looking for work, has seen a significant drop among U.S.-born men aged 25 to 54.

Currently, only 88.4 percent of men in this age group are participating in the labor force, one of the lowest levels ever recorded. This is a severe decline from the 96 percent participation rate seen in 1960.

The situation is even more dire for U.S.-born men in the same age range with a high school diploma or less.

Only 81.6 percent are currently participating in the labor force, a figure that is just a tenth of a percent above the lowest level ever recorded.

This decline in workforce participation among less-educated men suggests that they are being left behind in the current job market, further exacerbated by the influx of immigrant labor.

Advocates for increased immigration often argue that there are not enough workers without the addition of immigrants.

However, the CIS report challenges this narrative by pointing to the long-term deterioration in labor force participation among U.S.-born men.

The report argues that addressing this issue should be a priority, rather than relying on immigrant labor to fill the gaps.

Since taking office, Biden has presided over an unprecedented surge in illegal immigration. Officials have recorded over 9.5 million nationwide encounters and an estimated 1.7 million illegal immigrant gotaways.

The foreign-born population residing in the United States has also reached an all-time high of 51.6 million, marking an increase of 5.1 million since March 2022.

The Biden administration’s immigration policies have contributed to the displacement of natural-born American workers, particularly those with lower levels of education.

This displacement not only affects individual livelihoods, but also has broader social and economic consequences.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

U.S. State Dept helps place American journalists on Ukraine “hit-list”

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
U.S. State Dept helps place American journalists on Ukraine “hit-list”

The U.S. government has grown increasingly hostile towards Americans who speak the truth. But now they have crossed a major line in this recent attack.

And the U.S. State Dept has helped place American journalists on a Ukraine “hit-list.”

Republicans in Congress have launched an investigation into whether the U.S. State Department played a role in a Ukrainian NGO’s publication of an “Enemies list” that includes prominent GOP lawmakers, activists, and certain conservative news outlets.

The investigation follows concerns raised by Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) in a letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Wednesday.

The contentious list was published by Anatoly Bondarenko’s Data Journalism Agency (TEXTY) and is part of a study titled, “Rollercoaster: From Trumpists to Communists. The forces in the U.S. impeding aid to Ukraine and how they do it.”

The list names 338 individuals and 76 organizations, including The Daily Wire hosts Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, Michael Knowles, Matt Walsh, and Brett Cooper.

Vance and Gaetz, who are also listed in the study, criticized it as “largely an excuse to smear a large group of Americans who have been skeptical of aid to Ukraine.”

They accused the study of being part of a “coordinated media strategy” resembling a U.S.-targeting influence operation.

The lawmakers expressed concerns that U.S. taxpayer dollars might be funding these direct attacks on American citizens based on their political views.

“All Americans can agree that our tax dollars should not be supporting direct attacks on U.S. persons based upon reasonable political disagreement,” the letter from Vance and Gaetz states.

They requested various records from the State Department by June 28 to assess potential violations of U.S. law.

Rep. Jim Banks (R-IN), who is running for a Senate seat, drew attention to the issue last week with a viral post on X (formerly Twitter), warning about the “Enemies list” compiled by TEXTY. Banks, who also appears on the list, stated that his office would reach out to others included in the database.

Michael Knowles later shared a letter from Banks, thanking him for “informing me that a U.S. gov’t-affiliated Ukrainian NGO has put me on a hit list.”

Knowles added, “I hope that Congress will heed your advice and stop funding groups that target and endanger American citizens.”

In his letter to Knowles and Shapiro, Banks announced that he had contacted Republican leaders on the House Appropriations Committee, urging them to prevent the State Department and USAID from partnering with any foreign entities that harass Americans.

In a press release on Wednesday, Banks revealed that House Republicans successfully passed a provision to prohibit funding for TEXTY during the full House Appropriations Committee markup of the Fiscal Year 2025 State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs funding bill.

“It’s shameful for our agencies to be using Hoosiers’ tax dollars to collaborate with foreign groups that attempt to intimidate U.S. citizens and lawmakers,” Banks said. “I’d like to thank the Republicans on the Appropriations Committee for defunding any such work with TEXTY.”

The controversy surrounding the list has intensified the debate over U.S. support for Ukraine, especially amid accusations that the Biden administration has not done enough to ensure taxpayer dollars are used responsibly.

The investigation by Vance and Gaetz underscores the broader concerns within the GOP about government overreach and the potential misuse of federal funds for partisan purposes.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

Biden’s treasonous immigration policy hit millions with a brutal truth

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Biden’s treasonous immigration policy hit millions with a brutal truth

Joe Biden’s immigration policies are abysmal. But now, things have reached a new level.

Because Biden’s treasonous immigration policy hit millions with a brutal truth.

In a horrifying new move, the Biden administration is advancing a policy that could grant mass amnesty to illegal immigrants who entered the United States under the administration’s “parole” authority if they are married to U.S. citizens.

This policy, known as “parole in place,” is poised to make it easier for these individuals to secure amnesty and become American citizens.

The decision comes despite ongoing concerns about the administration’s handling of the border crisis and the integrity of the nation’s immigration system.

According to CBS News, the new policy aims to streamline the process for illegal immigrants married to U.S. citizens to adjust their status without having to leave the country.

Traditionally, these immigrants are required to exit the U.S. and re-enter legally to obtain a green card.

The administration’s use of parole authority has already been unprecedented.

President Biden has employed this authority to facilitate the entry of 30,000 immigrants each month from countries like Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.

Under U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) guidelines, parole is described as a mechanism that allows an immigrant to be present in the U.S. without being formally admitted for purposes of immigration law.

It is not intended to bypass normal visa processing procedures or replace established refugee processing channels.

Angelo Hernandez Fernandez, a spokesperson for the White House, stated that the administration continues “to explore a series of policy options, and we remain committed to taking action to address our broken immigration system.”

This latest policy shift is expected to benefit approximately 1.1 million illegal immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens.

Many states argue that the Biden administration has overstepped its bounds, using parole in ways that circumvent established immigration laws and procedures.

In defense of the new policy, the administration asserts that it is a necessary step to address the complexities and inefficiencies of the current immigration system.

However, countless Americans contend that this approach undermines the rule of law and incentivizes illegal immigration by providing an easier path to legal status and citizenship.

The Biden administration’s approach to immigration has been a point of contention since day one.

The president has faced criticism from many for a lenient stance on border security and illegal immigration. This latest policy decision is likely to intensify that criticism.

Under President Biden’s tenure, the U.S. has seen record levels of illegal immigration.

The administration’s policies, including the widespread use of parole, have been blamed for exacerbating the border crisis.

Many people point out that by making it easier for illegal immigrants to gain legal status, the administration is encouraging more people to enter the country unlawfully.

Immigration laws exist to protect the sovereignty and security of the nation.

By effectively granting amnesty to potentially millions of illegal immigrants, the Biden administration is disregarding the legal framework designed to ensure that immigration is conducted in a controlled and lawful manner.

As the Biden administration pushes forward with this policy, it is likely to face robust opposition from Republican lawmakers and state officials.

Legal battles are expected to ensue, potentially reaching the Supreme Court.

The outcome of these challenges will have significant implications for the future of U.S. immigration policy.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Trump’s hit Hunter Biden with a reality check that exposed the entire Biden family

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Trump’s hit Hunter Biden with a reality check that exposed the entire Biden family

The Biden family is doing everything they can to cover for Hunter. But the truth will always prevail.

And now, Trump’s hit Hunter Biden with a reality check that exposed the entire Biden family.

In a landmark decision on Tuesday, Hunter Biden was found guilty on all counts in his federal gun case, marking a significant development in a case that has captivated national attention.

The charges included making false statements while purchasing a firearm, making false statements regarding information kept by federal firearms licensed dealers, and unlawful possession of a firearm.

The conviction is seen by many as a critical moment in the ongoing scrutiny of President Joe Biden’s family.

Shortly after the verdict was handed down, former President Donald Trump, who has been a vocal critic of the Biden administration, released a scathing statement through his campaign.

Trump characterized the trial as a mere “distraction” from what he termed as the “real crimes” allegedly committed by the Biden family.

The former president vowed to put an end to what he calls the “Biden Family Criminal Empire” if re-elected in November.

“This trial has been nothing more than a distraction from the real crimes of the Biden Crime Family, which has raked in tens of millions of dollars from China, Russia, and Ukraine,” wrote Trump campaign National Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. “Crooked Joe Biden’s reign over the Biden Family Criminal Empire is all coming to an end on November 5th, and never again will a Biden sell government access for personal profit.”

Trump’s statement reflects a broader sentiment among many Americans who believe that the mainstream media and judicial system have disproportionately focused on Hunter Biden’s lesser offenses while allegedly ignoring more significant corruption involving President Biden and his family.

Hunter Biden, 54, was found guilty of making false statements on a federal background check form when purchasing a firearm.

He falsely claimed he was not using drugs at the time, despite evidence showing he was an unlawful user and addicted to a controlled substance during that period.

The case hinged on Biden’s dishonesty in his declaration while purchasing a Colt Cobra 38SPL revolver on October 12, 2018.

“The central issue in this case,” prosecutor Leo Wise stated, “is the evidence has established beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was an unlawful user of and addicted to a controlled substance when he bought the gun on October 12, 2018, during the period when he possessed it from October 12 to October 23, and for more than six months after.”

The conviction of the president’s son is bound to have significant political ramifications. While Hunter Biden’s legal troubles have been a point of contention for years, this verdict brings a new level of scrutiny to the Biden administration.

Many people argue that the focus on Hunter Biden’s gun case is being used to overshadow more serious allegations of corruption and influence-peddling involving the Biden family.

Trump’s campaign has consistently pointed to the Biden family’s alleged financial dealings with foreign entities as evidence of corruption.

The former president’s allies argue that the mainstream media and federal agencies have failed to adequately investigate these claims, focusing instead on lesser issues to distract the public.

“This conviction is a minor sideshow compared to the real issues at hand,” said Trump ally and political strategist Steve Bannon. “The American people deserve to know the full extent of the Biden family’s corruption and how it has compromised our national security.”

Hunter Biden’s conviction marks a critical juncture in the ongoing saga surrounding the Biden family.

While the legal consequences for Hunter Biden are clear, the political fallout is just beginning.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Stunning new Hunter Biden laptop reports reveal major FBI secret

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Stunning new Hunter Biden laptop reports reveal major FBI secret

With new reports on Hunter Biden’s laptop being released, more Americans are finding out the truth. And following Hunter’s guilty verdict, more information is being discovered.

But now, stunning new Hunter Biden laptop reports have revealed major FBI secrets.

In a striking display of defiance, not a single one of the 51 former intelligence officials who signed a letter in 2020 suggesting that Hunter Biden’s laptop was likely “Russian disinformation” has retracted their claim, despite mounting evidence to the contrary.

This development raises serious questions about the credibility and motivations of these officials, many of whom held high-ranking positions in the intelligence community.

The letter, which played a significant role in shaping public perception during the 2020 presidential election, has now been thoroughly discredited.

It has been revealed that the FBI was in possession of Hunter Biden’s laptop at the time, and it was known to be authentic.

This revelation casts doubt on the motivations behind the letter and suggests a possible coordinated effort to mislead the public for political purposes.

Erika Jensen, an FBI agent and witness in Hunter Biden’s gun trial, confirmed last week that the laptop was genuine and had not been tampered with.

Jensen’s testimony debunked claims that the laptop’s data was hacked or manipulated, or that it was part of a Russian disinformation plot to aid former President Donald Trump’s campaign.

The letter was widely circulated and heavily relied upon by major media outlets and Democratic operatives to discredit the explosive revelations about Hunter Biden’s business dealings found on the laptop.

The New York Post’s Emma-Jo Morris, who initially broke the story, faced significant backlash and censorship from social media platforms, further amplifying the narrative pushed by the former intelligence officials.

CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand amplified the discredited narrative through a story in Politico, which cited the letter signed by the 51 officials.

This narrative was subsequently used by then-presidential candidate Joe Biden during a debate with Trump to dismiss the laptop’s contents as Russian disinformation, reportedly with coordination from current Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

Despite overwhelming evidence contradicting their claims, many of the signatories refuse to admit they were wrong.

Former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told Fox News that he does not regret signing the letter.

Other signatories, including Ronald Marks, Marc Polymeropoulos, Douglas Wise, Paul Kolbe, John Sipher, Emile Nakhleh, and Gerald O’Shea, maintain that their actions were “patriotic.”

“There continues to be by many a calculated or woefully ignorant interpretation of the October 2020 letter signed by fifty-one former intelligence officials concerning Hunter Biden’s laptop,” their lawyer told Fox News.

He argued that the letter was merely a warning about potential foreign interference, which, while technically true, grossly misrepresented the situation to the American public.

Greg Treverton, former chair of the National Intelligence Council, showed no remorse, stating, “This is very old news. What we said was true, we were inferring from our experience, and it did look like a Russian operation. We didn’t, and couldn’t of course say it was a Russian operation. Enough said.”

Similarly, Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism Center director, dismissed the scandal, claiming it was “addressed… several years ago.”

Such statements underscore a troubling lack of accountability among those who played pivotal roles in shaping a false narrative that influenced the outcome of a presidential election.

The refusal of these former intelligence officials to acknowledge their mistake undermines public trust in the intelligence community and raises concerns about the politicization of national security.

The Hunter Biden laptop story was not just about the personal failings of a presidential candidate’s son; it was about potential corruption and conflicts of interest that could compromise national security.

The disinformation label effectively suppressed a critical discussion about these issues, shielding Joe Biden from scrutiny during a crucial election period.

As more information comes to light, it is crucial for Americans to remain vigilant and discerning about the sources of their information and the motivations behind them.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Biden goes for broke on ending the Second Amendment

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Biden goes for broke on ending the Second Amendment

Joe Biden and the Left want to take away Americans’ right to bear arms. And they will stop at nothing until they’ve done just that.

But now, Joe Biden is going for broke on ending the Second Amendment.

President Joe Biden’s administration is poised to launch an unprecedented assault on American gun owners and the lawful firearms industry, as his tenure faces increasing scrutiny from a frustrated electorate.

With wide-open borders, rising crime rates, and soaring costs of living already burdening Americans, Biden’s latest move targets one of the most fiercely defended constitutional rights: the right to bear arms.

In a glaring example of executive overreach, Biden’s Department of Commerce has introduced an interim final rule that threatens to smother American gun companies with onerous regulations.

This rule aims to prevent civilians in other countries from lawfully purchasing American firearms and ammunition, a move that could cripple the domestic firearms industry while advancing Biden’s globalist agenda.

The new rule requires American firearm manufacturers to adopt new Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCNs) for tracking their products abroad.

Although U.S.-made firearms are already marked with serial numbers, this additional layer of bureaucracy is purportedly to enhance tracking.

In reality, it increases compliance costs and reduces revenue for American firearm manufacturers without offering any tangible improvement in tracking capabilities. Serial numbers already suffice for identification, making this new requirement redundant and burdensome.

Moreover, the rule will drastically restrict firearm sales to foreign civilians, but not to foreign governments.

This selective restriction reflects a fundamental belief held by the Left: that only those in power should have weapons, not the people they govern.

The hypocrisy is blatant as the administration defends this stance by falsely claiming that civilian-exported firearms are more likely to be diverted to black markets than those sold to foreign militaries and police agencies.

Credible analyses consistently show that government stockpiles and illegal imports are the primary sources of guns used in crimes and terrorism, not legally imported civilian firearms.

Simultaneously, Biden’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) has launched a new rule that reclassifies occasional gun sellers as professional dealers, subjecting them to complex and burdensome regulations.

This “Engaged in Business” rule significantly expands the ATF’s control over ordinary gun owners and edges closer to establishing a de facto national gun owner registry.

This rule undermines the fundamental right to self-defense by placing additional legal hurdles for Americans who wish to sell or trade firearms.

The expansive regulations will likely discourage legal firearm transactions, pushing them underground and making it harder for law-abiding citizens to exercise their Second Amendment rights.

When the executive branch proposes such overreaching restrictions without congressional approval, they become subject to the federal rule-making process.

During this process, Americans have the right to submit comments opposing the rule, which federal officials must consider. Although the comment period for the ATF’s business rule has closed, the debate over Biden’s firearm export ban is still open.

The Biden administration’s new regulations on the firearm industry are more than just bureaucratic overreach; they are political maneuvers designed to placate a radical base at the expense of constitutional rights.

By targeting the Second Amendment, President Biden demonstrates his willingness to undermine the American people to advance his political agenda.

Conservative lawmakers and Second Amendment advocates are rallying against these unjust regulations.

Efforts are underway to overturn both the Commerce Department’s export restrictions and the ATF’s expanded definition of gun dealers.

Organizations like Heritage Action are mobilizing Americans to submit comments and support legislative action to protect the Second Amendment.

The Biden administration’s actions reveal a clear disdain for lawful gun owners and a dangerous willingness to undermine the Constitution.

As Americans face increasing economic and social challenges, these additional burdens on gun ownership and the firearms industry threaten to erode one of the nation’s most fundamental freedoms.

It is imperative that citizens, lawmakers, and advocacy groups unite to resist these overreaching regulations and uphold the principles of freedom and self-defense that define the American spirit.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Rumors of Democrats’ decision to replace Biden have shocked the nation

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Rumors of Democrats’ decision to replace Biden have shocked the nation

There has been widespread speculation that the Democrats will replace Joe Biden. But new evidence has completely exposed their plans.

And new rumors of the Democrats’ plans to replace Biden have shocked the nation.

As President Joe Biden faces the lowest approval ratings of his term, renowned statistician and FiveThirtyEight founder Nate Silver has proposed that Biden dropping out of the race might be the best course of action for Democrats, just five months before the 2024 election.

This suggestion comes as Biden’s approval rating plummets to an all-time low, raising serious concerns about his viability as a candidate.

According to the latest average of polls by FiveThirtyEight, President Biden’s approval rating has dropped to a mere 37.6%.

This dramatic decline has sparked a conversation about the feasibility of his re-election campaign.

Nate Silver, known for his sharp electoral analysis, took to the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) on Monday to voice his opinion on the matter.

“Biden dropping out of the race is worth discussing — even if, at this point, it would be a big risk for Democrats,” Silver wrote.

He acknowledged the significant risk involved but highlighted that continuing Biden’s campaign could pose an even greater threat to Democratic prospects.

“There’s some threshold below which continuing to run is a bigger risk,” Silver added. “Are we there yet? I don’t know. But it’s more than fair to ask.”

Silver elaborated on his concerns, painting a grim picture of Biden’s re-election chances given the current political climate.

“If I’d told you 10 years ago a president would seek re-election at 81 despite a supermajority of Americans having concerns about his age, and then we’d hit 8% inflation for 2 years, you wouldn’t be surprised he was an underdog for re-election. You’d be surprised it was even close!” Silver stated.

The issue of Biden’s age has been a persistent concern among voters, with many questioning his ability to lead effectively given the numerous challenges the country faces.

This concern is compounded by economic issues, such as prolonged high inflation, which have eroded public confidence in the Biden administration.

Silver’s comments drew criticism from some quarters, particularly from those who felt it was inappropriate to question Biden’s candidacy following Donald Trump’s conviction on 34 felony counts related to falsifying business records in the New York hush money case. One user on X suggested that Silver should also call for Trump to drop out of the race.

“‘Trump should drop out too!’ is such a weird dunk on people who are pointing out that Biden has big challenges,” Silver retorted. “Yes, Trump should drop out! I agree! Biden would lose by 7 points, but I agree, the Republican Party and the country would be better served by a different nominee.”

Silver has been consistent in his argument that Biden’s decision to seek a second term has hurt the Democratic Party’s chances in 2024.

“What’s clearer IMO is that Democrats would have been better served if Biden had decided a year ago not to seek a second term, which would have allowed them to have some semblance of a primary process and give voters a say among the many popular Democrats across the country,” Silver noted.

In his Silver Bulletin newsletter in February, Silver warned Democrats that Biden was on a trajectory to lose to Trump.

“If you’d asked me a year ago, I would have told you that Joe Biden was a reasonably clear favorite in the event of a rematch against Donald Trump,” he wrote.

However, he pointed out that Biden’s situation had worsened considerably in recent months. “If he were 10 years younger, he might still be a 65/35 favorite,” Silver explained. “But if his campaign is substantially encumbered by his age, he’s probably the underdog.”

The concerns about Biden’s viability are further underscored by recent polling data.

The RealClearPolitics average of polls shows that Trump, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, currently leads Biden in each of the seven battleground states.

This polling advantage for Trump suggests that Biden’s chances of securing a second term are increasingly precarious.

As the 2024 election approaches, the debate over President Biden’s candidacy continues to intensify. Nate Silver’s suggestion that Biden should consider dropping out reflects a broader anxiety within the Democratic Party about the president’s ability to win re-election.

With approval ratings at an all-time low and Trump leading in key states, the Democrats face a daunting challenge.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story and more.

1...606162...160Page 61 of 160

2024 Copyright © All rights reserved.

Quick Links

Must Read

Popular Articles