Donald Trump and the media have never gotten along. Now it’s heating up big time.

And Trump ribbed reporters in the press room in a hilarious exchange caught on camera.

Trump’s Wit Shines at Packed White House Briefing

President Donald Trump showcased his trademark humor and focus on results during a lively White House press event Monday, deftly sidestepping a reporter’s suggestion to build a “big, beautiful briefing room” while emphasizing his commitment to enhancing the nation’s capital.

Amid a standing-room-only briefing, Trump tackled pressing matters, including deploying 800 National Guard troops to support Washington, D.C.’s Metropolitan Police Department in combating crime—a bold move to restore safety.

The overflowing crowd prompted a journalist to remark, “This is the most people we’ve ever seen in this briefing room.” Trump, seizing the moment, turned to his dynamic press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, asking, “Is this the largest crowd that you’ve ever seen?”

Leavitt confirmed, “This is definitely the most packed briefing, and I think all of you would agree. I think that’s why we need to build a ballroom.”

Trump’s Ballroom Project Elevates White House Prestige

When Real America’s Voice correspondent Brian Glenn jumped in, asking, “You’re building a big, beautiful ballroom. Could we build a big, beautiful briefing room? Updated with technology, more seats!” Trump’s response was classic:

“No, I don’t want to do that. I don’t want you to be comfortable. No, I don’t want to make life comfortable.” The room erupted in laughter, showcasing Trump’s ability to connect with humor while staying focused on priorities that serve the nation.

The ballroom initiative, a cornerstone of Trump’s plan to elevate America’s global standing, will create a dedicated space for hosting world leaders, state dinners, and grand ceremonies.

Leavitt previously explained, “The White House is currently unable to host major functions honoring world leaders in other countries without having to install a large and unsightly tent approximately 100 yards away from the main building’s entrance.” The 90,000-square-foot addition, designed to seat 650 guests and blend seamlessly with the White House’s classical architecture, is set to be “a much-needed and exquisite addition,” reflecting Trump’s commitment to excellence.

Trump’s Leadership Reclaims White House Grandeur

By personally driving the ballroom project, funded without taxpayer dollars, Trump demonstrates his business acumen and dedication to restoring the White House’s stature as a global symbol of American strength.

The initiative addresses a long-standing logistical shortfall, ensuring the U.S. can host dignitaries with the dignity they deserve—no more makeshift tents. His refusal to cater to media demands for a lavish briefing room further cements his focus on what truly matters: practical solutions and national pride.

Trump’s ability to balance humor, decisive action, and visionary projects like the ballroom sets him apart, reinforcing his leadership as he tackles crime in D.C. and elevates America’s image on the world stage.

🚨REPORTER: "Can we build a big beautiful briefing room?"

TRUMP: "No. I don't want to do that. I don't want you to be comfortable. I don't want to make life more comfortable."

LMAO 😂😂😂 pic.twitter.com/cGNK1dRylX

— Autism Capital 🧩 (@AutismCapital) August 11, 2025

Trump likes to make deals. But you have to see the forest through the trees.

And now Donald Trump slammed a world leader for making a completely unreasonable demand of him.

Trump’s Firm Stance on Ukraine Peace Negotiations

President Donald Trump expressed strong disagreement with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday, following Zelensky’s dismissal of a proposed territorial exchange with Russia as a means to conclude the ongoing conflict—a bold move by Trump aimed at swiftly restoring stability in the region.

Speaking to journalists in the White House Briefing Room, Trump highlighted his frustration while emphasizing his vision for a pragmatic resolution. “I get along with Zelensky, but, you know, I disagree with what he’s done, very, very severely disagree. This is a war that should have never happened,” Trump said.

“I was a little bothered by the fact that Zelensky was saying, ‘Well, I have to get constitutional approval.’ I mean, he’s got approval to go into war and kill everybody, but he needs approval to do a land swap, because there’ll be some land swapping going on. I know that through Russia and through conversations with everybody — for the good of Ukraine,” he added. “Russia has occupied a big portion of Ukraine. They’ve occupied some very prime territory. We’re going to try to get some of that territory back for Ukraine.”

Trump’s approach reflects a determined effort to broker a deal that could benefit Ukraine by reclaiming key areas, showcasing his negotiation skills in international diplomacy.

Zelensky’s Rejection and the Proposed Land Exchange

Zelensky firmly opposed the idea over the weekend, stating on Saturday that “Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier,” and adding, “Any decisions made against us, any decisions made without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace. They will bring nothing. These are dead decisions; they will never work.”

The concept of a land swap emerged from Trump’s discussions last Friday, ahead of his announced summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska later this week. Reports indicate Putin conveyed to Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff a willingness to halt the war in return for control over the Donbas region in eastern Ukraine, where Russian forces have seized substantial territory amid ongoing Ukrainian resistance.

“Putin, I believe, wants to see peace, and [Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelensky wants to see peace,” Trump said at the White House last Friday.

He elaborated that there would be “some swapping” of territories between Russia and Ukraine.

“It’s very complicated, but we’re going to get some back and we’re going to get some switched … to the betterment of both.”

Trump’s proactive proposal aims to facilitate a balanced outcome, potentially ending the bloodshed while advancing Ukraine’s interests through strategic adjustments.

Upcoming Summit and Trump’s Mediation Role

Although Zelensky has not been invited to the initial Alaska meeting, Trump has conditioned the talks on Putin’s commitment to subsequent discussions with the Ukrainian leader. In recent statements, Trump has directed pointed criticism toward Putin for attacks on civilian areas, while now urging Zelensky to embrace flexibility for peace.

“We’re going to have a meeting with Vladimir Putin, and at the end of that meeting, probably in the first two minutes, I’ll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made,” Trump said on Monday. “Ultimately, I’m going to put the two of them in a room. I’ll be there, or I won’t be there, and I think it’ll get solved.”

This hands-on involvement by Trump positions him as a key architect of potential resolution, leveraging his influence to drive a swift and equitable end to the war.

The Democrat Party is fracturing. And it’s not pretty.

Now Bernie Sanders undercut Kamala Harris with a brutal takedown out of nowhere.

Sanders’ Sharp Rebuke of Harris’ Campaign Strategy

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders delivered a pointed assessment of Kamala Harris’ unsuccessful 2024 presidential run, highlighting her excessive dependence on billionaire advisors who, he argued, diverted her from championing the interests of everyday American workers—a misstep that underscored deeper flaws in her approach.

During an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union” with anchor Dana Bash on Sunday, Sanders elaborated on a remark he made at a rally in West Virginia.

WATCH:

“How do you run for president and not develop a strong agenda which speaks to the economic crisis facing working families?”@SenSanders says that one reason Kamala Harris lost in 2024 was because “she had too many billionaires telling her not to speak up for the working class.” pic.twitter.com/QRnwxO8znQ

— State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) August 10, 2025

Bash played a clip from the event where Sanders addressed the crowd: “One of the reasons, in my view, that Kamala Harris lost this election is she had too many billionaires telling her not to speak up for the working-class of this country.”

“Ouch,” Bash responded, pressing him for more details.

Exposing the Influence of Wealthy Elites on Harris’ Agenda

Sanders stood firm, clarifying his stance while exposing what he saw as a troubling elite sway over Harris’ decisions. “Well, no, I think, I mean, I don’t think that that’s — I like her, she’s a friend of mine, but her core consultants, you know, were heavily influenced by very wealthy people,” Sanders explained.

“How do you run for president and not develop a strong agenda which speaks to the economic crises facing working families? You know, more income and wealth inequality today than we’ve ever had. You have 60% of our people living paycheck to paycheck. You’ve got a health care system which is broken and dysfunctional, and despite spending so much, we’re the only major country not to guarantee health care to all people. How do you not talk about these issues?”

“She talked about affordability —” Bash interjected.

Sanders pushed back, criticizing the superficiality: “Well, but in a vague — I don’t want to rehash that campaign, but I think the clue to Democratic victories is to understand that you’ve got to stand unequivocally with the working class of this country. You need an agenda that speaks to the needs of working people.”

This critique painted a picture of a campaign detached from the real struggles of ordinary Americans, prioritizing affluent influences over substantive policy.

Contrasting Sanders’ Pre-Election Support for Harris

Interestingly, Sanders’ current disapproval marks a notable reversal from his position just two months prior to the election, when he defended Harris as being “pragmatic” for concealing her more radical, Marxist-leaning views in an effort to appeal to voters and secure victory—a strategy that ultimately backfired and revealed inconsistencies in her messaging.

The White House is usually busy with tariff deals and immigration enforcement. Now they want someone specific in cuffs.

Because President Trump announced a $50 million bounty on the last person imaginable.

Trump Escalates Fight Against Maduro’s Drug Empire

On Thursday, President Donald Trump’s administration announced a $50 million reward for information leading to the arrest of Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro, doubling the previous bounty to intensify pressure on a key threat to U.S. national security.

Attorney General Pam Bondi, in a video posted on X, condemned Maduro’s ties to criminal networks, stating, “Maduro uses foreign terrorist organizations like [Tren de Aragua], Sinaloa and Cartel of the Suns to bring deadly drugs and violence into our country.”

WATCH:

Today, @TheJusticeDept and @StateDept are announcing a $50 MILLION REWARD for information leading to the arrest of Nicolás Maduro. pic.twitter.com/D8LNqjS9yk

— Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) August 7, 2025

Seizing Assets and Targeting Narco-Terrorism

The Drug Enforcement Administration has seized 30 tons of cocaine tied to Maduro’s associates, including nearly seven tons directly linked to him, which Bondi noted is “a primary source of income for the deadly cartels based in Venezuela and Mexico.”

These drugs, often laced with fentanyl, have fueled a crisis costing “countless American lives.”

Since Maduro’s 2020 indictment in the Southern District of New York for charges including narco-terrorism and weapons violations, the Department of Justice has confiscated over $700 million in assets, including two private jets and nine vehicles.

Trump’s leadership builds on his first term’s $15 million bounty, later raised to $25 million under President Joe Biden, with Thursday’s increase signaling a relentless pursuit of justice.

Trump’s Resolve to End Maduro’s Reign of Terror

Bondi emphasized that Maduro, described as “one of the largest narco-traffickers in the world,” remains a direct threat to U.S. security.

“The DOJ has seized over $700 million of Maduro linked assets, including two private jets, nine vehicles and more.

Yet Maduro’s reign of terror continues,” she said, vowing that “under President Trump’s leadership, Maduro will not escape justice, and he will be held accountable for his despicable crimes.”

Trump’s bold strategy not only targets Maduro but also aims to disrupt the cartels’ financial networks, reinforcing his administration’s focus on border security and combating the opioid epidemic.

The American government should look out for Americans always. Now that’s finally the case.

Because the White House is out for blood after a Fortune 500 company played ball with China.

Trump Takes Bold Stand Against Intel CEO’s China Connections

President Donald Trump decisively called for the immediate resignation of Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan, amplifying Republican alarms over Tan’s troubling ties to Chinese firms linked to the People’s Liberation Army, the military arm of the Chinese Communist Party.

“The CEO of Intel is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately,” Trump declared on Truth Social.

“There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem.”

Trump’s swift action underscores his unwavering commitment to safeguarding U.S. national security and prioritizing American interests in the critical semiconductor industry.

Senate Scrutiny Exposes Tan’s Questionable Past

Trump’s demand follows a powerful letter from Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) to Intel’s board, spotlighting serious national security risks tied to Tan’s business dealings and his leadership at Cadence Design Systems.

During Tan’s tenure as Cadence CEO from 2009 to 2021, the company illegally exported advanced chip design tools to China’s National University of Defense Technology, a sanctioned entity tied to military supercomputing and nuclear simulation, resulting in a $140 million penalty.

Cotton questioned whether Intel’s board knew of federal subpoenas issued to Cadence during Tan’s time before appointing him in March 2025, reinforcing Trump’s push to hold corporate leaders accountable for compromising U.S. security.

Protecting America’s Semiconductor Edge

Intel, a cornerstone of U.S. innovation based in Santa Clara, California, is vital to national defense and economic strength, producing chips for military systems, data centers, and AI.

With over $8 billion in CHIPS Act funding and a $3 billion Pentagon contract for secure semiconductor supply chains, Intel’s role is non-negotiable.

Trump’s call to oust Tan, who has investments in hundreds of Chinese firms, including at least eight linked to the People’s Liberation Army, reflects his resolute stance against foreign influence in America’s tech sector.

As Intel grapples with a 15% workforce cut and a retreat from overseas expansions, Trump’s leadership aims to ensure the company remains a trusted pillar of American technological dominance.

The border has never looked better. And now comes the hard part.

But ICE was flooded with applications after making a jaw-dropping policy reversal.

ICE Bolsters Ranks to Combat Illegal Immigration Crisis

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced Wednesday that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is scrapping age limits for recruits, welcoming patriots of all ages to join President Trump’s aggressive push to deport illegal immigrants.

Previously, ICE restricted criminal investigator roles to those under 37 and deportation officers to under 40.

“In the wake of Biden’s open borders disaster, our country needs dedicated Americans to join ICE to remove the worst of the worst out of our country,” Noem’s department stated.

This bold move aims to reverse the chaos of unchecked illegal immigration, signaling a no-nonsense approach to border security.

Massive Incentives to Secure the Border

With over 80,000 applicants flooding ICE in just one week, Noem’s call for “even more patriots” is backed by hefty $50,000 signing bonuses and outreach to retired law enforcement.

Yet, the agency struggles to meet Trump’s target of 3,000 daily deportations, currently managing only 900 arrests and 1,300 removals per day.

Online ICE officer forums highlight the grueling pace, with one noting it’s “something that has never ever been seen before.”

Scott Shuchart, a former Biden-era ICE official, criticized the relaxed standards, warning against hiring “spies, or criminals, or traitors, or drug addicts.”

Supporters, however, see the urgency to bolster ICE as critical to rooting out illegal immigrants exploiting America’s borders.

Defying Critics to Protect American Communities

ICE’s recruitment drive faces vicious attacks from immigrant rights advocates and Democrats, who sling baseless comparisons to “N*zi storm troopers” while assaults on officers have skyrocketed 800%.

Amid this resistance, ICE’s use of a “South Park” image in ads prompted a cheeky response from the show’s X account: “Wait, so we are relevant?”

Noem, touting recruitment spikes—108% for the Coast Guard, 200% for the Secret Service—credits Trump’s dismantling of Biden’s lax enforcement and diversity policies for the surge.

Actor Dean Cain, a sworn officer, rallied behind the mission, declaring, “If you want to help save America, ICE is arresting the worst of the worst. I like that, I voted for that.”

Backed by new funding from Trump’s budget law, ICE’s push to expel illegal immigrants underscores a commitment to restoring law and order, despite detractors’ efforts to obstruct.

The US may be infiltrated already. The extent of it could be huge.

And now Tom Cotton demanded an investigation into a possible front for terrorism.

Sen. Cotton Urges IRS to Investigate CAIR’s Nonprofit Status

On August 5, 2025, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) sent a letter to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) requesting the revocation of the nonprofit status of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), citing alleged ties to terror groups, including Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Cotton referenced CAIR’s designation as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation (HLF) terrorism financing case, described by the Justice Department as the largest of its kind in U.S. history.

The DOJ found that HLF and its leaders provided approximately $12.4 million to Hamas, resulting in convictions on multiple counts of conspiracy, material support to a designated terrorist organization, and money laundering.

Cotton argued, “Tax-exempt status is a privilege, not a right, and it should not subsidize organizations with links to terrorism.”

CAIR’s Response and Controversial Statements

CAIR rejected Cotton’s claims as “based on debunked conspiracy theories,” comparing his request to McCarthy-era tactics.

In a statement to Fox News Digital, CAIR described itself as “an independent American civil rights organization” with over 30 years of defending constitutional rights and opposing bigotry, terrorism, and genocide.

The group said it condemned the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks on civilians and the ongoing conflict in Gaza, emphasizing “moral consistency.”

However, CAIR faced criticism after its National Executive Director Nihad Awad, in November 2023, expressed being “happy to see” Palestinians “breaking the siege” during the October 7 attacks, comments the Biden administration condemned as “shocking, antisemitic” through spokesperson Andrew Bates.

The Anti-Defamation League also criticized recent CAIR remarks, including Awad’s claim that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu influences U.S. policy and a CAIR Los Angeles director’s reference to Congress and the White House as “Israeli-occupied territories.”

Background and Ongoing Debate

The HLF case linked CAIR to the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee, though CAIR’s attempt to remove its name from the unindicted co-conspirator list was unsuccessful.

Cotton’s letter highlighted the IRS’s authority to review whether an organization’s actions align with its tax-exempt purpose, arguing that CAIR’s alleged connections warrant scrutiny.

CAIR countered that it has consistently advocated for civil rights and condemned violence, positioning itself as a defender against anti-Muslim discrimination.

The controversy reflects broader tensions over national security, free speech, and the role of nonprofit organizations, with Cotton’s request raising questions about the balance between oversight and allegations of political targeting.

Election season is almost upon us is some states. But the entire race got blown up.

Because a leading Democrat candidate was caught taking money from Chinese communists.

Spanberger Accepts Donation from CCP-Linked Businessman

Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Abigail Spanberger received $50,000 in campaign contributions from Pin Ni, president of Wanxiang America, the U.S. subsidiary of Chinese automotive conglomerate Wanxiang Group, according to campaign finance records.

The donations, made in two $25,000 installments in April and May 2025, have drawn scrutiny due to Wanxiang’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

A 2021 Wanxiang Group press release posthumously honored its founder, Lu Guanqiu—Pin Ni’s late father-in-law—as a “National Outstanding Communist Party Member,” praising his lifelong commitment to communism and alignment with CCP directives, including quotes from Chinese President Xi Jinping commending Guanqiu’s loyalty to the Party.

Guanqiu’s bio on Wanxiang’s website notes his roles as a representative in the CCP’s 13th and 14th congresses and a delegate to the 9th, 10th, and 11th Chinese National People’s Congress.

Political and Policy Context

The donations have sparked debate, as Spanberger, a former U.S. representative and CIA officer, has championed electric vehicle (EV) tax credits and mandates, policies that could benefit Wanxiang’s EV operations, including its luxury brand KARMA Automotive.

A spokesperson for Spanberger’s campaign defended her record, stating, “Virginians know that Abigail Spanberger has a demonstrated record of standing up for America’s national security, delivering results for Virginia families across party lines, and never backing down from keeping the American people safe.”

The campaign emphasized its focus on community safety, cost reduction, job protection, and improving Virginia’s public schools.

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Republican opponent Winsome Earle-Sears criticized the donations, saying, “Taking $50,000 from someone with clear Chinese Communist Party ties tells us all we need to know. You can’t claim to stand up to foreign threats while pocketing money from someone celebrated by the CCP.”

Broader Donation Patterns and Legal Questions

Pin Ni has a history of donating to both Democratic and Republican candidates across multiple election cycles, including contributions to the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Democratic Senator Cory Booker’s “Purpose Pac” in October 2024, per Federal Election Commission records.

However, the donations to Spanberger have raised concerns about compliance with Virginia law, which prohibits political contributions from foreign nationals, and Chinese law, which typically bars CCP members from holding foreign citizenship or permanent residency.

The National Legal and Policy Center plans to file a complaint with the Federal Election Commission, with counsel Paul Kamenar stating, “It’s bad enough if Spanberger is taking illegal campaign donations from a foreign source, but outrageous that it’s from a member of the Chinese Communist Party.”

Spanberger’s campaign has not directly addressed these legal concerns but continues to highlight her national security credentials from her CIA tenure.

The US government moves at a snail’s pace. But that may be over.

Because Trump announced a sweeping plan to slash federal red tape.

GSA Partners with OpenAI for ChatGPT Enterprise

On August 6, 2025, the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) announced a partnership with OpenAI to provide ChatGPT Enterprise to all federal agencies for a nominal fee of $1 per agency for one year, as reported by Fox News Digital.

This initiative, part of the GSA’s OneGov Strategy to modernize federal procurement, aims to integrate advanced AI tools into government workflows.

GSA Federal Acquisition Service Commissioner Josh Gruenbaum emphasized that the deployment was thoroughly tested with policymakers and legal experts to ensure responsible use, focusing on automation, process efficiency, and reducing waste, fraud, and abuse.

The partnership aligns with the Trump administration’s AI Action Plan, announced in July 2025, to enhance U.S. leadership in artificial intelligence.

ChatGPT’s Capabilities and Federal Applications

ChatGPT Enterprise, which serves over 700 million weekly users globally, offers conversational capabilities, research with citations, task automation, document summarization, and brainstorming support, according to OpenAI’s Joseph Larson.

The GSA deal provides federal employees access to these tools, along with a 60-day period of unlimited use of advanced features like Deep Research and Advanced Voice Mode.

To support adoption, OpenAI is offering tailored training through its OpenAI Academy and a government user community, with additional support from partners like Slalom and Boston Consulting Group.

The initiative aims to bridge the gap between private sector AI advancements and federal capabilities, ensuring agencies can leverage cutting-edge technology to improve public service delivery.

Security and Strategic Goals

OpenAI emphasized that ChatGPT Enterprise prioritizes security, with no business data used to train or improve its models, a safeguard extended to federal use.

The GSA issued an Authority to Use (ATU) for the platform, ensuring compliance with federal security standards.

The partnership supports the Trump administration’s AI Action Plan, which focuses on empowering American workers, ensuring AI systems remain free of ideological bias, and protecting U.S. technologies from misuse, as outlined by AI and crypto czar David Sacks.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman noted that providing AI tools to federal workers enhances government efficiency and service delivery, aligning with the goal of maintaining U.S. dominance in the global AI race, further supported by initiatives like the $500 billion Stargate project for AI infrastructure.

Many Americans have a distrust of our electoral system. But this could change everything.

Because a federal court issued an election ruling with dire consequences.

5th Circuit Upholds Texas Mail-In Ballot ID Requirement

On Monday, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed a Texas law mandating that mail-in ballots include a state identification number or partial Social Security number, dismissing a challenge from the Biden administration.

Enacted in September 2021 as part of the Election Integrity and Protection Act signed by Republican Governor Greg Abbott, the law voids mail-in ballots lacking the required identification details.

The decision reversed a November 2023 ruling by U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez, who had invalidated the ID provision, and solidified a December pause on that injunction.

The ruling marks a significant moment in ongoing debates over election security and voter access in Texas.

Judge Ho Champions Law’s Alignment with Federal Standards

In the court’s opinion, Judge James Ho, known for his conservative stance, argued that the Texas law complies with the materiality provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

“The ID number requirement is obviously designed to confirm that each mail-in ballot voter is precisely who he claims he is. And that is plainly ‘material’ to determining whether such individual is qualified under State law to vote,” Ho wrote.

He highlighted vulnerabilities in mail-in voting, noting that basic voter information, such as names and registration addresses, is publicly available upon request from Texas election officials.

This accessibility, Ho argued, creates a risk of fraudulent ballots being cast with “minimal risk of detection” without stricter verification measures like the ID requirement.

Balancing Election Security and Voter Access Concerns

The Biden administration, joined by groups such as the League of Women Voters, challenged the law, asserting it violated the 1964 Civil Rights Act by imposing unnecessary barriers to voting.

Critics argued there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the ID requirement would effectively reduce voter fraud, potentially disenfranchising legitimate voters.

Texas countered that the measure is a critical tool for safeguarding election integrity.

Judge Ho supported this view, stating, “Our precedents compel us to side with Texas. We have made clear that States have a legitimate interest in combating voter fraud, and this enjoy ‘considerable discretion in deciding what is an adequate level of effectiveness to serve (their) important interests in voter integrity.”