CNN is not known for caring about people they disagree with. But even the most Radical Liberals were still shocked at this.
And CNN just said this horrifying thing about Trump live on air after the attempt on his life.
In a stunning and deeply troubling display of political spin, CNN’s Juliette Kayyem recently expressed concern that former President Donald Trump could benefit politically after a second assassination attempt.
Rather than focus on the alarming nature of the attack or condemn the violent individual responsible, Kayyem seemed more worried about the “problem” this posed for Democrats and the potential advantage it could give Trump in a heated election cycle.
The remarks have sparked outrage, raising questions about the media’s priorities when it comes to political violence and the lengths some are willing to go to downplay the severity of such attacks when the target is a conservative figure.
CNN's Juliette Kayyem laments this second Trump assassination attempt "could have impacted voters" and "will be used for political purposes" and that's "exceptionally unfortunate" pic.twitter.com/ymJKE3VbUZ
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) September 16, 2024
The incident took place over the weekend at Trump International Golf Course in West Palm Beach, Florida, when authorities apprehended 58-year-old Ryan Routh. Routh, a Democrat donor with a criminal record, was found hiding in the shrubbery near the former president, armed with an AK-47-style rifle.
The close proximity to Trump and the apparent intentions of Routh sent shockwaves through the political landscape. According to reports, federal law enforcement noticed the weapon and quickly moved in, prompting Routh to flee in his car. A witness, thankfully alert, managed to capture a photo of the car and its license plate, leading to Routh’s swift arrest.
The seriousness of this situation cannot be overstated. An armed assailant, mere yards away from a former president of the United States, raises significant concerns about security, the political climate, and the safety of public figures.
But rather than reflect on the grave implications of such a violent act, CNN’s Kayyem turned her focus to something else entirely: the possibility that Trump might benefit politically from the ordeal.
Kayyem’s comments aired on CNN late Sunday night, and they immediately raised eyebrows. Instead of addressing the attempted assassination as a non-partisan issue of national importance, she framed the situation as a political inconvenience. “And I really don’t care what you feel about him, or Harris,” Kayyem said, seemingly dismissing the gravity of a violent attempt on Trump’s life. “I mean, this is, this is the expectation that he will be safe.”
While Kayyem acknowledged that Trump should be safe from harm—something that should go without saying in any civilized society—her remarks quickly turned to how this would affect the election.
“And the reason why this is, you know, in some ways, you know, you said how close the election is, the problem is this is a safety issue that is being thrown into a very intense political environment in which the very fact of an assassination, a constitutional moment, because it’s, it could have impacted voters, will be used for political purposes.”
This focus on how Trump might gain politically from the assassination attempt reflects a disturbing double standard. Can you imagine if the roles were reversed and a high-profile Democrat was the target of such violence?
The outrage from the mainstream media would be deafening, with endless commentary about the dangers of political extremism and violence. But when the victim is Donald Trump, the narrative suddenly shifts to how this might inconvenience the Democrats in the upcoming election.
Kayyem’s comments raise a significant concern about how political violence is perceived depending on who the target is. She even suggested that the situation could be used for “political purposes” by Trump supporters.
This implication—that conservatives might cynically use a violent attack to their advantage—is an appalling accusation. It not only downplays the seriousness of the threat but also paints Trump and his supporters as opportunists rather than victims of political violence.
What Kayyem seems to miss entirely is that no one should have to endure assassination attempts. Regardless of one’s political beliefs, a society that turns a blind eye to violence against public figures it disagrees with is a society on the brink of losing its moral compass. The fact that this is even being discussed as a “problem” for Democrats rather than a national crisis shows just how far the media has fallen in its partisan approach to the news.
The media’s tepid response to this assassination attempt stands in stark contrast to how other acts of political violence are treated. When Democrats are the targets of threats or attacks, there is an immediate and overwhelming call for unity, compassion, and justice.
And rightly so. Violence should never be used as a political weapon, and all Americans, regardless of political affiliation, should stand together to condemn it.
Yet, in this case, there has been a notable silence from many in the mainstream media. Where are the calls for justice? Where are the demands for accountability for the individuals who harbor such violent intentions toward a former president? Why is the focus not on ensuring that this never happens again but rather on the political fallout?
The truth is that there is a blatant double standard at play here. When violence targets conservatives, it is often downplayed or ignored altogether. This is not only dangerous but also erodes trust in the media and the democratic process.
Kayyem’s remarks also reflect a deeper problem in American society: the rising tide of political violence and the normalization of such threats. Over the last several years, we have seen an increase in political intimidation, attacks, and threats against public figures, especially on the conservative side of the aisle. From attempted attacks on Republican lawmakers to threats against Supreme Court justices, the Left has been alarmingly silent when the violence is directed at their political opponents.
Instead of focusing on the potential “political” ramifications of an assassination attempt, Kayyem and others should be using their platforms to call for calm, condemn violence in all forms, and ensure that political disagreements do not devolve into bloodshed.
The fact that CNN’s Juliette Kayyem chose to lament the political fallout rather than unequivocally condemn the assassination attempt speaks volumes about the current state of media bias. When political violence is used as a tool or dismissed depending on the target, it not only undermines the safety of public figures but also threatens the integrity of our political system.
Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story and more.
