Donald Trump has a plan in his back pocket he’s about to unleash

The radical Left is doing absolutely everything they can to lock up Trump and prevent him from taking office again. But our former president is much tougher than they expected.

And Donald Trump has a plan in his back pocket he’s about to unleash.

Donald Trump, emboldened by the American people’s unwavering support, threw down a legal gauntlet Saturday night, demanding the dismissal of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s politically-charged indictment.

At the heart of his defense? A rock-solid principle enshrined in the Constitution: absolute presidential immunity for official acts.

This masterstroke, a 71-page legal masterpiece, dismantles Smith’s weak case brick by brick.

Trump’s lawyers eloquently argue that his efforts to safeguard the 2020 election, a duty sworn to every president, cannot be twisted into criminal charges by a vengeful Deep State.

The former president, after all, was merely exercising his First Amendment right to advocate for a fair election untainted by the stench of Democrat malfeasance.

Yet, Judge Chutkan, an Obama appointee with a clear partisan agenda, tossed aside these ironclad arguments, claiming Trump is not some “divine king.”

This judicial overreach, reeking of desperation and political bias, is precisely why Trump has appealed to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Remember, America cherishes a system of checks and balances.

The Democrat-controlled House impeached Trump, not once but twice, on flimsy charges.

The GOP-controlled Senate, representing the will of the people, twice acquitted him.

This legal ping-pong, orchestrated by a vindictive Left, proves their case is built on sand, not evidence.

But what if the court falls prey to the siren song of the Deep State?

Should presidents entrusted with defending our nation be subject to endless witch hunts orchestrated by partisan prosecutors like Smith?

The answer is a resounding no.

Granting immunity is not a blank check; it’s a shield against politically motivated attacks on the highest office in the land.

The implications are staggering.

A Trump victory in this legal battle would be a resounding triumph for democracy and the rule of law.

It would reaffirm the principle that presidents are not above the law, but neither are they punching bags for the Left’s insatiable thirst for revenge.

The January 9th oral arguments, a potential constitutional showdown, will be watched with bated breath.

Should Trump prevail, the 2024 election in which he is a frontrunner, will be a referendum on America’s choice: will we uphold the Constitution and its protections, or succumb to the Left’s hunger for power and silencing dissent?

Even though the radical Left is throwing everything they have at Trump, justice will prevail, and we must fight for the truth.

The Left must be stopped, and freedom and Democracy must be protected.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.