The Harris campaign is a failure. And they are giving Trump all sorts of ammo.
And now Donald Trump was just handed a major win by the Harris campaign.
As former President Donald Trump boldly steps up to the plate, ready to engage in three separate debates, Vice President Kamala Harris seems to be dragging her feet, casting doubt on her willingness to face Trump head-on. This reluctance, perceived by many as fear, is creating a stir across the political landscape, highlighting the stark contrasts between the two candidates.
Former President Trump, never one to shy away from a challenge, has agreed to participate in three crucial debates leading up to the 2024 election.
The debates, scheduled for September 4 on Fox News from Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, September 10 on ABC with David Muir at Philadelphia’s historic Independence Hall, and September 25 on NBC News with Lester Holt in Grand Rapids, Michigan, are seen as pivotal moments in the race.
Trump’s eagerness to engage directly with Harris in these debates underscores his confidence and his desire to expose what he and his supporters see as the failings of the Biden administration, of which Harris has been a key player.
The Trump campaign, in a statement to The Epoch Times, made it clear that Trump is prepared to make solo appearances if Harris refuses to participate in the Fox and NBC debates.
Vice President Kamala Harris, on the other hand, appears hesitant to commit to all three debates. While she has agreed to the ABC debate on September 10, her reluctance to confirm her participation in the Fox and NBC debates has raised eyebrows.
Harris’s response to questions about the additional debates has been vague at best, saying, “I am happy to have that conversation about an additional debate for after September 10.”
This apparent hesitation has fueled speculation that Harris and her campaign are deeply concerned about facing Trump on such a prominent stage.
The possibility that Harris might avoid these debates altogether only adds to the perception that she is intimidated by the former President’s formidable presence and debating skills.
Adding to the drama is President Joe Biden’s sudden and shocking withdrawal from the race following his disastrous performance in a June 27 CNN debate with Trump. Biden’s inability to effectively counter Trump’s arguments, coupled with a failed assassination attempt against Trump on July 13, led to mounting pressure for Biden to step aside.
On July 21, Biden announced he would not seek re-election but would finish his term, endorsing Harris as his successor.
Harris’s rise to the top of the Democratic ticket was not the result of overwhelming popular support or a clear vision for the future but rather a necessity borne out of Biden’s collapse.
As such, Harris’s campaign is now under intense scrutiny, and her reluctance to face Trump in multiple debates could be seen as a sign of weakness.
The stakes for these debates could not be higher. The RealClear Politics average of opinion polls shows Harris edging Trump by a mere 0.5 percent—a razor-thin margin that underscores how volatile the race remains.
Harris is expected to receive a boost in the polls following the Democratic National Convention, scheduled for August 19 to 22 in Chicago. However, any advantage she gains could be easily undone if she fails to perform well in the debates or, worse, if she refuses to participate at all.
For Trump, the debates are an opportunity to solidify his base, appeal to undecided voters, and cast doubt on Harris’s readiness to lead. His confidence in facing Harris in all three debates contrasts sharply with Harris’s cautious approach.
Trump’s strategy is clear: he wants to be seen as the candidate who is unafraid to tackle the tough issues and to take on his opponents directly.
Another aspect of Harris’s campaign that has drawn criticism is her approach to the media. Unlike Trump, who has always been willing to engage with reporters—even those who are overtly hostile—Harris has been notably reticent.
The Trump campaign has slammed her for not answering questions or granting interviews from the media, a move that could be interpreted as an attempt to avoid scrutiny.
Harris’s reluctance to face the press, coupled with her hesitancy about the debates, suggests a campaign that is more focused on controlling the narrative than on engaging with the American people.
This strategy may backfire, as voters often value transparency and accessibility in their leaders. By avoiding tough questions and potentially skipping crucial debates, Harris risks alienating the very voters she needs to win over.
As the election season heats up, all eyes will be on Harris and her decisions regarding the upcoming debates. Will she rise to the occasion and face Trump in all three, or will she continue to avoid the spotlight, raising further questions about her readiness to lead?
Trump, meanwhile, continues to dominate the narrative, positioning himself as the candidate who is unafraid to confront the issues head-on.
His willingness to participate in all three debates, even if it means standing alone on stage, demonstrates his determination to fight for every vote and to expose what he sees as the failures of the Biden-Harris administration.
In the end, the debates could prove to be a decisive factor in the 2024 election. If Harris fails to show up, it will only reinforce the growing belief among many that she is not up to the task of leading the nation. But if she does participate, she will need to bring her A-game, because Trump is clearly ready and eager to take her on.
Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.
