The Biden administration spent most of its term claiming that the border crisis was not a problem. Now they are rapidly backpedaling.

And a Biden official has made a surprising admission that reveals the truth about it all

Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell confirmed on Monday that the millions of illegal immigrants who have crossed the southern border under the Biden-Harris administration are directly contributing to rising unemployment in America.

Powell’s comments came in response to a reporter’s question regarding the labor market and how the influx of undocumented workers has impacted job creation and job loss.

House Speaker Mike Johnson wasted no time drawing attention to Powell’s remarks, posting on X, “The Federal Reserve Chairman admitted the massive influx of illegal immigrants under Biden and Harris has raised the unemployment rate. This administration’s refusal to secure the border is actively harming American workers and our economy.”

The Federal Reserve Chairman admitted the massive influx of illegal immigrants under Biden and Harris has raised the unemployment rate.

This administration’s refusal to secure the border is actively harming American workers and our economy. pic.twitter.com/3rryXkKTAs

— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) September 18, 2024

During his discussion, Powell responded to a question about whether “labor market cooling” would result in job loss. His answer was striking: “It depends on the inflows, right? So if you’re having millions of people come into the labor force, then you’re creating 100,000 jobs.”

Powell acknowledged the influx of millions of illegal immigrants into the U.S. labor market, adding, “We understand there’s been quite an influx across the borders, and that has actually been one of the things that’s allowed the unemployment rate to rise.”

This candid acknowledgment confirms what many conservatives have long suspected: the Biden administration’s open-border policies are actively undermining the American labor market by creating more competition for jobs.

Powell’s statement is a far cry from the empty promises the administration continues to peddle. The consequences of these policies are being felt by hardworking Americans who are watching their job opportunities evaporate as millions of illegal immigrants flood the labor market, creating a surplus of workers that drives down wages and raises the unemployment rate.

This latest revelation from the Federal Reserve chairman adds to the growing list of failures by the Biden-Harris administration to secure our southern border. Since taking office, President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have overseen an unprecedented border crisis that has allowed millions of illegal immigrants to pour into the country, with no end in sight.

In fact, the administration has continued to not only neglect the border but actively exacerbate the problem. Harris, who was appointed by Biden in March 2021 to address the “root causes” of migration, has yet to make any meaningful progress.

Instead, the administration has pursued policies that encourage illegal immigration while ignoring the strain it places on the American worker and economy.

Harris has repeatedly promised to fix the issue, but as former President Donald Trump pointed out during the September 3 presidential debate, Harris has failed to take action despite being in the White House for nearly four years.

When asked about the border crisis, Harris claimed that she would handle it “on day one” if elected. Trump rightly challenged her on this, asking why she hasn’t done anything already if she truly believes in securing the border. After all, she’s been in charge of this issue for years now.

Powell’s admission that the massive influx of illegal immigrants is hurting the U.S. labor market should serve as a wake-up call to all Americans. Biden and Harris have spent the last four years catering to the radical left, ignoring the cries of everyday Americans who are struggling to find jobs and make ends meet.

The border crisis is no longer just a national security issue; it’s an economic one. With millions of illegal immigrants entering the country, competing for jobs, and suppressing wages, it is clear that the Biden-Harris administration has turned its back on American workers. Rather than protect the interests of American citizens, they’ve chosen to prioritize the needs of those who enter the country illegally.

The impact of these policies has been devastating. Industries that rely on lower-wage workers, such as construction, agriculture, and hospitality, are being flooded with a surplus of labor, driving down wages for everyone. American workers, many of whom are already struggling in the current economic climate, are being forced to compete with illegal immigrants for jobs that should go to legal residents and citizens.

Let’s be clear: the current border crisis is not an accident or an oversight. It is a direct result of the policies put in place by the Biden-Harris administration and their allies on the left. From day one, this administration has embraced policies that encourage illegal immigration, turning a blind eye to the overwhelming consequences it has on our economy and workforce.

Biden and Harris have gone out of their way to ensure that illegal immigrants are protected, even at the expense of American citizens. They’ve fought to end Trump-era policies like the “Remain in Mexico” program and border wall construction, which had helped reduce illegal crossings. Instead, they’ve embraced policies that fly illegal immigrants from the border to destinations across America, often without notifying state or local authorities.

These actions have sent a clear message to would-be illegal immigrants: if you make it across the border, you will be welcomed with open arms. It’s no surprise, then, that illegal border crossings have skyrocketed under Biden’s watch, overwhelming Border Patrol agents and creating dangerous conditions at the southern border.

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell’s comments on the impact of illegal immigration on the labor market are a damning indictment of the Biden-Harris administration’s economic policies. The flood of illegal immigrants into the U.S. workforce has undermined job creation and led to rising unemployment, particularly among lower-wage workers.

This is the inevitable outcome of a White House that prioritizes political correctness over the needs of everyday Americans. For years, conservatives have warned about the dangers of open-border policies, and now, those warnings are coming to fruition. The American people are paying the price for this administration’s reckless policies, with fewer jobs, lower wages, and rising unemployment.

Powell’s remarks make it clear that the Biden-Harris administration has not only failed to protect our borders but has also actively harmed the American economy by allowing millions of illegal immigrants to enter the country. Rather than address the crisis, Biden and Harris continue to double down on their disastrous policies, leaving American workers in the lurch.

The contrast between the Trump administration’s border policies and the current crisis under Biden could not be more stark. During his time in office, former President Donald Trump made border security a top priority, implementing policies that dramatically reduced illegal immigration and protected American jobs. His administration’s efforts to build the border wall, reinstate “Remain in Mexico,” and crack down on illegal immigration were successful in curbing the influx of undocumented workers.

Trump understood that a secure border is essential not only for national security but for the health of our economy. By enforcing immigration laws and prioritizing the needs of American citizens, Trump protected American jobs and ensured that legal immigrants had a fair chance to succeed.

As Powell’s remarks confirm, the Biden-Harris administration’s open-border policies are actively harming the American economy and workforce. Their refusal to secure the southern border has allowed millions of illegal immigrants to flood the labor market, leading to rising unemployment and suppressed wages for hardworking Americans.

It’s time for accountability. The American people deserve leaders who will prioritize their interests and protect their jobs, not cater to radical left-wing agendas that undermine our country’s economic security. President Trump’s successful border policies serve as a roadmap for restoring order and prosperity to our nation. With his return to the White House, we can put an end to the border crisis and get America back on track.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

The Biden administration is full of corruption. But no one thought things would get this far.

And now, a leading Republican Governor has discovered this terrifying secret about the Biden administration.

In a bombshell interview Thursday night, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis revealed that federal investigators are refusing to cooperate with state officials in their investigation into the second assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump.

This alarming development raises serious concerns about the Biden-Harris administration’s willingness to provide transparency in a case that could have resulted in the tragic loss of a former president and current Republican frontrunner.

Speaking with Laura Ingraham on Fox News, DeSantis did not mince words. After signing an executive order earlier this week authorizing Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to conduct a criminal investigation, DeSantis emphasized the gravity of the situation and the clear obstruction the state has encountered from federal authorities.

“The answer is ‘no,’ they’re not being cooperative,” DeSantis told Ingraham. “I am concerned. For example, we were rebuffed, our investigators were rebuffed just going to the fence line outside of Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach.”

Tonight I joined Laura Ingraham to discuss Florida’s investigation into the assassination attempt of Donald Trump. pic.twitter.com/k0OyUJDvr7

— Ron DeSantis (@GovRonDeSantis) September 19, 2024

This is not just a matter of inconvenience or bureaucratic red tape. The refusal by federal authorities to cooperate with the state of Florida is an outrageous overreach by the Biden administration, which appears to be playing politics with an investigation that could have resulted in a deadly attack on a former president. DeSantis’ comments highlight the disturbing trend of federal interference, raising the question: what are they hiding?

The governor made it clear that this obstruction was not a one-time incident but part of a larger pattern of refusal to allow the state to conduct its own lawful investigation. “The Biden-Harris administration does not want the state of Florida to be involved in the investigation,” DeSantis said. “I don’t expect them to cooperate at all.”

This is not the first time questions have arisen about the Biden administration’s treatment of Donald Trump. Whether it’s the weaponization of federal agencies against Trump or the continued efforts by Democrats to smear and sideline him, this latest act of blocking Florida’s investigation only adds fuel to the fire of suspicion.

Governor DeSantis’ decision to initiate a state-level investigation was not only reasonable but necessary. He pointed out that multiple violations of Florida law likely occurred across various jurisdictions during the assassination attempt.

“We think at least three judicial circuits, this guy … committed potential violations of Florida law. So we have a duty to investigate this. We have a duty to bring the appropriate charges and we also have a duty to inform the public about how this happened,” DeSantis said.

In light of the federal government’s refusal to cooperate, Florida is stepping up to do what the Biden administration won’t: ensure a full, transparent investigation and hold any wrongdoers accountable. DeSantis’ strong stance in favor of law and order, even in the face of federal resistance, demonstrates a sharp contrast with the chaos and lack of accountability coming from the current administration.

The public has every right to demand answers. How could an assassin get that close to Donald Trump? How was this allowed to happen again, especially after a similar assassination attempt just two months prior? These are critical questions that DeSantis’ investigation seeks to address, even as the Biden administration drags its feet.

Governor DeSantis made it clear that one of his primary reasons for launching a state investigation is the lack of public trust in the federal investigation. “I don’t believe the public has any confidence in the investigation,” DeSantis said.

And who could blame the public for feeling that way? After all, this isn’t the first time federal agencies have come under fire for their handling—or mishandling—of high-profile investigations involving Trump.

DeSantis went a step further, outlining how his administration immediately took steps to ensure key evidence was preserved, something the federal government has a poor track record of doing. “So as soon as we got word of this on Sunday, I told our guys in state law enforcement, save all his social media because you know Facebook will delete it, the tech companies want to delete it,” DeSantis explained. This move is critical, especially considering how Big Tech has repeatedly shielded those with far-left ideologies from scrutiny while quickly silencing conservative voices.

The governor’s concerns also extended to how this assassin—who tried to shoot Trump at the Trump International Golf Club—ended up in Florida in the first place. “We need to know, how did he end up in Florida to begin with? What is this pathway this guy has taken to end up in those bushes trying to assassinate the former President of the United States and current Republican nominee?” DeSantis questioned.

These are valid concerns. The federal government’s apparent unwillingness to get to the bottom of this assassination attempt could potentially leave the public in the dark about key facts, including whether this individual was part of a broader plot or was influenced by the growing culture of political violence perpetuated by radical leftist rhetoric.

DeSantis also noted the federal government’s failure to answer questions about previous incidents of political violence, including the first assassination attempt on Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, and even the Las Vegas mass shooting several years ago. “We have not gotten answers about Butler,” DeSantis said, referring to the location where Trump was shot in July. “We have not gotten answers about things like that Las Vegas shooting from many years ago.”

These lingering questions only further erode public trust in federal investigations, and DeSantis is right to push for answers. His decision to authorize a state investigation underscores his commitment to transparency and accountability—something that appears sorely lacking in the current administration.

Let’s not mince words: the federal government’s refusal to cooperate with Florida’s investigation into the assassination attempt on Donald Trump is nothing short of an attack on justice and democracy. At a time when political violence is on the rise, the federal government should be doing everything in its power to ensure that the perpetrators are brought to justice. Instead, they are stonewalling Florida’s efforts, all while doing nothing to ensure the American people get the truth.

By refusing to fully investigate these incidents or cooperate with state authorities, the Biden-Harris administration is sending a chilling message: that political violence is acceptable, so long as it targets individuals they disagree with.

This is a dangerous precedent that could lead to further violence, and it’s why DeSantis’ actions are not just about defending Trump, but about defending democracy itself.

In a time when the federal government appears more interested in covering up than uncovering the truth, Governor Ron DeSantis is doing what every American should expect from their leaders: standing up for justice, law, and accountability. The federal government’s refusal to cooperate with Florida’s investigation into the second assassination attempt on Donald Trump is both alarming and unacceptable.

Governor DeSantis has made it clear that the state of Florida will not back down in its efforts to uncover the truth and hold those responsible accountable. As we approach the 2024 election, the American people deserve answers—not stonewalling, not political games, and certainly not a cover-up.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

The establishment media hates Trump. And now it seems they might have had a role to play in all of this.

And a new report has unveiled the terrifying truth about establishment media regarding the attempt on Trump’s life.

A new analysis conducted by the Media Research Center (MRC) found that 95 percent of the media coverage following the second assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump was overwhelmingly negative.

ABC, CBS, and NBC dedicated significant airtime to the event, but rather than focusing on the heinous act of violence and the disturbing trend of political assassination attempts, these networks chose to continue their anti-Trump crusade.

The blatant bias and dangerous rhetoric perpetuated by the establishment media are nothing new, but this time, it has crossed a line that should concern every American who values democracy and the safety of our political leaders.

In the wake of this assassination attempt, the media’s response wasn’t to condemn the violence unequivocally. Instead, they used the opportunity to attack Trump, downplay the threat, and even suggest that Trump’s own words were to blame. Such behavior from these media outlets is not just irresponsible; it’s dangerous.

According to the MRC’s findings, 70 percent of the campaign news airtime across these major networks was dedicated to the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. However, rather than portraying the seriousness of the incident or addressing the obvious threat to democracy posed by such violence, the networks’ commentary was heavily skewed against Trump.

Out of 21 evaluative comments reviewed by MRC, a shocking 20 were negative toward Trump, with only one positive remark—if it can even be considered that.

This is where the danger of establishment media becomes crystal clear. Instead of focusing on the increasing violence being directed toward a former president and current Republican frontrunner, the media chose to shift the narrative, blaming Trump’s rhetoric for the violence against him.

NBC’s Lester Holt, for example, wasted no time linking the assassination attempt to Trump’s supposed “fierce rhetoric” on the campaign trail, making it sound as if Trump himself was the cause of the violence targeted at him.

🚨 INSANE: NBC’s Lester Holt just blamed President Trump for the attempt on his life, saying it was due to his rhetoric on the illegal migrant crisis in Springfield

SERIOUSLY?

Who the HELL is buying this crap? pic.twitter.com/Otb7Lc1hB9

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 16, 2024

But perhaps the most egregious example came from CBS’s Norah O’Donnell. Instead of condemning the attempted assassination and the forces that could have incited such an act, O’Donnell turned her focus toward Trump’s remarks on immigration, implying that Trump’s words were responsible for “increasing the threat of political violence” in Springfield, Ohio.

CBS's Norah O'Donnell watched Lester Holt tie the 2nd attempted assassination of @realDonaldTrump to Springfield rhetoric last night and said, "hold my box wine" pic.twitter.com/MYfIImhHI3

— Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) September 17, 2024

It’s as if the media is suggesting that those who disagree with Trump’s policies or rhetoric are justified in turning to violence—a dangerous precedent that could encourage further political violence.

One glaring omission in the media’s coverage was the almost complete lack of attention to the role that left-wing rhetoric might have played in these assassination attempts. The suspect in this latest attempt, Ryan Wesley Routh, reportedly blamed “communist left rhetoric” for his violent actions.

This, however, was barely mentioned by the media. Instead, they quickly pivoted to attacking Trump, downplaying any potential responsibility that Democratic rhetoric may hold in fanning the flames of violence.

MRC’s analysis found that out of 48 minutes of coverage across these three networks, less than two minutes—1 minute and 53 seconds—were spent on exploring the possibility that violent, anti-Trump rhetoric from the left could be contributing to these assassination attempts. Two minutes.

That’s all the attention they gave to a legitimate concern that the left’s constant demonization of Trump and his supporters could be inciting violence.

Meanwhile, the media has spent years portraying Trump as a threat to democracy, labeling him and his supporters as extremists, racists, and even terrorists. It’s no surprise, then, that those who consume this steady diet of anti-Trump propaganda might be emboldened to commit violent acts. But rather than acknowledge this reality, the media brushes it aside, preferring to continue its vilification of Trump.

This isn’t the first time Trump has faced violence while the media remained largely silent. Just two months ago, Thomas Matthew Crooks attempted to assassinate Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, killing one person and wounding two others in the process. Yet the media’s response was lukewarm at best, and they quickly moved on from the story.

Contrast this with how the media handled the attack on Paul Pelosi. In that case, the media spent weeks discussing the political implications of the violence and pointing fingers at Republicans for allegedly inciting the attack.

But when Trump is the target, the rules change. The media seems almost eager to downplay the severity of the threat and move on, lest they have to grapple with the fact that their own rhetoric may be contributing to this wave of political violence.

The hypocrisy is staggering. Leftist figures and media outlets have routinely made incendiary remarks about Trump and his supporters. From Maxine Waters encouraging her followers to “push back” on Trump administration officials to rhetoric from prominent Democrats painting Trump as an existential threat to democracy, the vitriol has been constant.

Yet when violence erupts, the media ignores these provocations and instead seeks to blame Trump for the very violence directed at him.

It’s no wonder that millions of Americans feel that the establishment media is out to get Trump. The constant negative coverage, the refusal to hold Democrats accountable, and the media’s eagerness to blame Trump for everything under the sun, even assassination attempts, is enough to make anyone skeptical of the media’s motives. The American people are fed up with the media’s anti-Trump bias and their refusal to acknowledge the dangers of the left’s rhetoric.

Donald Trump continues to stand strong in the face of these threats, showing more resilience and courage than the media ever will. While they may attempt to silence him through negative coverage and biased reporting, Trump’s message resonates with everyday Americans. They see through the lies and propaganda. They know that Trump is fighting for them, for their jobs, for their families, and for their freedom.

The establishment media has shown, once again, that they are not interested in truth or objectivity. They are interested in one thing: stopping Donald Trump at any cost, even if it means downplaying assassination attempts and shifting the blame onto the victim. Their dangerous rhetoric is a threat to democracy and free speech, and it must be called out for what it is.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Joe Biden is a liar, and he doesn’t care about the American people. And now the whole world can see how bad things are.

Because Biden has made a stunning admission that exposes his past lies.

On Thursday, President Biden made headlines with the announcement of a $7.3 billion investment into rural electrification projects as part of the much-debated Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The administration’s decision to funnel billions of dollars into green energy initiatives has reignited the debate over the purpose and effectiveness of this massive spending package.

During a speech in Westby, Wisconsin, Biden’s comments raised eyebrows and added to the confusion surrounding the true intent of the Inflation Reduction Act. In what appeared to be a slip-up, Biden suggested that the bill wasn’t actually about reducing inflation, leaving many Americans wondering what this legislation was really meant to accomplish.

Biden on the Inflation Reduction Act: "We should have named it what it was." pic.twitter.com/yfWvXxk0x3

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) September 5, 2024

Biden’s statement, which came while promoting his administration’s new rural electrification project, was particularly telling: “I’m proud to announce that my investments, through my investments, the most significant climate change law ever – and by the way, it is a $369 billion bill – it’s called the, we should have named it what it was.”

This slip of the tongue has left critics questioning whether the Inflation Reduction Act was ever intended to tackle inflation in the first place, or if it was just another green energy boondoggle hidden behind a misleading title.

Biden’s remarks, whether intentional or not, only serve to confirm what many conservatives have been saying since the IRA’s inception: the bill has little to do with reducing inflation and everything to do with pushing a radical green agenda.

Signed into law in August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act passed Congress along strict party lines, with no Republican support. Vice President Kamala Harris cast the tie-breaking vote in the Senate, solidifying the bill’s passage and launching what Democrats hailed as a historic piece of climate legislation.

From the start, Republicans have been vocal in their opposition to the act, calling it a wasteful spending spree under the guise of economic relief. Despite its title, the IRA directs billions of taxpayer dollars toward green energy projects, including solar, wind, and now rural electrification.

The $7.3 billion investment announced this week will be distributed across 16 cooperatives providing electricity to rural areas in 23 states, as part of a broader $13 billion allocation for rural electrification programs. While the Biden administration has touted this investment as a way to bring power to underserved communities, critics argue that it’s yet another example of Democrats using taxpayer money to fund their green energy priorities.

When the Inflation Reduction Act was first proposed, Americans were grappling with record inflation, high gas prices, and skyrocketing grocery bills. Many saw the bill as a potential lifeline that would help ease the economic burden on working-class families. Instead, the law turned out to be a massive green energy spending plan, with very little focus on inflation. In fact, President Biden has admitted this fact multiple times.

During a speech in Utah earlier this year, Biden echoed his recent comments in Wisconsin, saying he shouldn’t have called the bill the Inflation Reduction Act because “it has less to do with reducing inflation than it has to do with providing alternatives that generate economic growth.” It’s clear that even the President himself sees the IRA for what it truly is: a climate change law, not an economic relief package.

Republicans and conservative economists have long pointed out the absurdity of naming a bill that focuses on green energy as an “Inflation Reduction Act.” According to many experts, the law will do little to bring down inflation or provide any real relief to struggling American families.

PBS News reported that economists have criticized the IRA, saying it “has just not been a significant factor” in lowering inflation rates. Yet the administration continues to claim victory, even as prices at the pump remain high and families struggle to make ends meet.

Biden’s announcement of the $7.3 billion investment in rural electrification is the latest example of the administration’s prioritization of green energy projects over actual economic solutions. While the administration claims the project will create 4,500 permanent jobs and 16,000 construction jobs, many conservatives are skeptical of these numbers and the long-term benefits of such investments.

Rural America, in particular, has been hit hard by the Biden administration’s policies. Rising fuel prices, inflation, and burdensome regulations have made life more difficult for farmers, ranchers, and small business owners across the country.

Instead of addressing these pressing issues, the Biden administration is once again pouring billions of dollars into unproven green energy projects, with little evidence that they will actually improve the lives of everyday Americans.

This rural electrification project is part of a broader push by the administration to “modernize” America’s energy grid and transition the country away from fossil fuels. While the administration touts this as a forward-thinking move, many conservatives see it as a blatant attempt to impose the Green New Deal on rural communities that are already struggling to survive.

The failure of the Inflation Reduction Act to address actual inflation is one of its most glaring flaws. As inflation continues to erode the purchasing power of American families, the Biden administration remains focused on its climate agenda.

Rather than tackling the root causes of inflation, such as excessive government spending and burdensome regulations, the administration is pouring money into green energy projects that may never deliver on their promises.

The $369 billion set aside for green energy in the IRA is a prime example of this misguided approach. Instead of providing immediate relief to Americans who are suffering under high inflation, the Biden administration is using taxpayer dollars to fund experimental energy projects that may take decades to yield results—if they ever do.

Congressional Republicans have made their opposition to the Inflation Reduction Act clear from the very beginning. Every single GOP member of the House and Senate voted against the bill, and many continue to criticize it as a wasteful and ineffective piece of legislation.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) has been particularly vocal in his criticism, calling the bill a “disaster” for the American economy. “This so-called Inflation Reduction Act does nothing to lower prices for working families,” McCarthy said last year. “It’s just a $369 billion slush fund for Democrats to push their radical climate agenda.”

Many conservatives share McCarthy’s sentiment, viewing the IRA as yet another example of the Democrats’ reckless spending and misplaced priorities. Instead of addressing the real issues facing American families, such as inflation, crime, and border security, Democrats are focused on pushing their progressive agenda, regardless of the cost.

President Biden’s $7.3 billion rural electrification investment is just the latest in a long line of green energy boondoggles funded by the Inflation Reduction Act. Despite its name, the IRA has done little to address inflation, and Biden’s own comments have confirmed that the bill was never really about inflation to begin with.

As Republicans continue to criticize the law and its impact on American families, the Biden administration remains focused on its climate change agenda, no matter the cost to the American taxpayer.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Trump’s campaign is constantly under attack from the Left. And things are heating up.

And a major Trump supporter has been hit with a massive court ruling that could end the whole campaign.

In a pivotal decision that could influence the upcoming presidential election, Dane County Circuit Court Judge Stephen Ehlke ruled on Monday that Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s name must remain on the ballot in the battleground state of Wisconsin.

Despite Kennedy’s recent endorsement of Republican candidate Donald Trump and his subsequent efforts to remove his name from ballots, Judge Ehlke declared that state law offers no provision for voluntary removal after nomination papers have been submitted—except in the case of a candidate’s death.

This ruling is a significant development in the high-stakes 2024 presidential election, where Wisconsin is expected to play a key role in determining the outcome. The decision reflects a broader legal battle that Kennedy has faced across the country as he seeks to have his name stricken from ballots in key states following his decision to drop out of the race as an independent and throw his support behind Trump.

In his ruling, Judge Ehlke emphasized the clarity of Wisconsin’s election laws. “The statute is plain on its face,” he stated.

According to Wisconsin law, once a presidential candidate has submitted the required nomination papers, their name cannot be removed from the ballot unless they have died. In Kennedy’s case, having already filed as an independent candidate for president, he was unable to voluntarily withdraw his name despite his recent political decisions.

“Mr. Kennedy has no one to blame but himself if he didn’t want to be on the ballot,” Ehlke added, suggesting that Kennedy’s legal maneuvering came too late in the process. While Kennedy and his legal team argued that his change in political alignment should allow for his name to be removed, the judge firmly rejected this reasoning.

Kennedy is now facing a tight timeline to appeal the decision, with clerks preparing to print Wisconsin’s election forms by Wednesday.

The Wisconsin elections commission had previously turned down his request for removal by a five-to-one margin, citing the same statute that Judge Ehlke relied on. Now, Kennedy’s legal team is expected to take their case to a state appellate court for a final decision.

The Wisconsin ruling is part of a larger legal effort by Kennedy to have his name removed from presidential ballots in several battleground states after deciding to endorse Trump.

Since Kennedy announced his departure from the race as an independent and aligned with Trump, he has sought to remove his name from ballots in at least 10 key states.

However, his efforts have been met with mixed results. In some states, Kennedy’s legal team has succeeded in their bid to have his name removed, while in others, courts have ruled against him.

Just last week, the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled in favor of Kennedy, ordering his name to be removed from state presidential ballots. The 4-3 decision was seen as a victory for the Kennedy-Trump alliance, with Kennedy’s supporters celebrating the removal as a step toward consolidating conservative voters behind Trump.

In contrast, the Michigan Supreme Court recently ruled against Kennedy, deciding that his name must remain on the state’s presidential ballots. Michigan’s decision was a blow to the Kennedy campaign, as the state remains one of the most critical battlegrounds in the 2024 election.

With the potential to split the conservative vote, Kennedy’s name on the ballot could siphon crucial votes away from Trump, complicating the Republican candidate’s path to victory.

The ruling in Wisconsin takes on added significance given the state’s importance in presidential elections. As one of the most fiercely contested battleground states, Wisconsin has been a focal point of both Republican and Democratic campaigns. In 2016, Donald Trump narrowly won the state by fewer than 23,000 votes, but in 2020, President Joe Biden flipped the state back to the Democrats by a similarly slim margin.

With both Trump and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris expected to face a tight race in Wisconsin, Kennedy’s presence on the ballot could have profound implications. Although Kennedy has endorsed Trump, his name on the ballot as an independent could lead to voter confusion or even split the conservative vote—an outcome that could ultimately benefit Harris.

This possibility has been a concern for Trump’s campaign, which had hoped that Kennedy’s endorsement would unify right-leaning voters. By remaining on the ballot in Wisconsin and other battleground states, Kennedy risks drawing votes away from Trump and complicating the Republican nominee’s efforts to secure victory.

Judge Ehlke’s ruling also highlights the importance of election integrity and adherence to the rule of law. While Kennedy’s legal team argued for flexibility in allowing his name to be removed from the ballot, the judge’s decision underscores the need for clear and consistent election laws. Once a candidate has followed the process to qualify for the ballot, they cannot simply change course without adhering to the established rules.

This legal clarity is crucial in battleground states like Wisconsin, where even minor discrepancies in the election process can have significant consequences. As the nation continues to debate issues of election integrity, the case of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. serves as a reminder of the importance of following the rule of law, even in the face of unexpected political developments.

With Wisconsin clerks preparing to print election ballots this week, Kennedy’s legal team will need to move quickly if they hope to appeal the ruling and remove his name from the ballot. The state appellate court has yet to weigh in on the matter, but time is running out.

For Trump’s campaign, the stakes couldn’t be higher. With Kennedy remaining on the ballot in key states like Wisconsin, Trump risks losing votes to a candidate who has already dropped out of the race. This outcome could give Kamala Harris and the Democrats an advantage in what is shaping up to be a close and fiercely contested election.

While Kennedy’s endorsement of Trump may have bolstered conservative enthusiasm, his continued presence on the ballot poses a significant risk to Republican unity. As the election draws closer, both Kennedy and Trump will need to navigate the legal and political challenges posed by this unexpected turn of events.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Since the second attempt on Trump’s life, people all across the world have realized that something is going on. And now, we might finally have answers.

Because a new discovery has unveiled the ties that Trump’s would-be assassin has to the Biden administration.

In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that the man arrested in connection to the second assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, Ryan Wesley Routh, had been flagged as a potential threat by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in 2023.

Despite these warnings and glaring red flags, Biden’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) declined to pursue the case, leaving a dangerous individual free to plan and nearly execute an attack on a former president of the United States.

This failure to act is yet another disturbing sign of the incompetence and neglect within the Biden administration, especially at a time when Americans are growing increasingly concerned about security, both at home and abroad. How could someone with such obvious ties to violence, militancy, and extremism slip through the cracks, even when flagged by U.S. authorities?

Ryan Wesley Routh was not some random individual; his background was well known to authorities long before his arrest for attempting to assassinate Donald Trump. In 2023, Routh was flagged by CBP officials after returning from Ukraine.

According to a report from Just The News, Routh admitted to CBP officials at the Honolulu airport that he had been involved in recruiting fighters from various countries, including Afghanistan, Moldova, and Taiwan, to fight in the Ukrainian war against Russia. Routh had traveled extensively, with documented visits to Warsaw, Poland (near the Ukraine border), and Istanbul, Turkey, in 2022 and 2023.

Routh even handed the CBP agents a business card listing him as the director of a group called the “International Volunteer Center,” which claimed to have connections with countries like Syria, Pakistan, and Israel. It was clear from this encounter that Routh was not just an ordinary traveler—he was someone with potentially dangerous global connections and motives. Yet, when CBP referred his case to Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the division shockingly declined to investigate.

The interview notes, which were later made public, stated, “Subject provided his recruiting business card… which lists his recruiting partners that he speaks with to recruit soldiers from Afghanistan, Romania, Pakistan, Syria, and Israel.”

Still, DHS and HSI refused to follow up on the case. The failure to investigate left Routh free to operate unchecked, ultimately leading to his attempted assassination of Donald Trump.

This failure by the Biden administration to act on a flagged individual is not only an example of gross negligence, but it also raises questions about where their priorities lie. Why did the DHS choose to ignore such a high-risk individual, especially someone with an international footprint and ties to known conflict zones?

This was not the first time Routh had been flagged by authorities. In fact, the FBI received a tip in 2019 alleging that Routh, a convicted felon, was in possession of a firearm. However, in another display of government incompetence, the FBI failed to take meaningful action.

While the agency did follow up on the tip and referred it to local law enforcement in Honolulu, no further investigation was carried out, and Routh continued to move freely.

Adding to the gravity of the situation, Routh has been vocal on social media about his support for Ukraine and even expressed a willingness to die for the country. His online presence was littered with pro-Ukraine sentiments and radical calls to action.

In 2023, he published a book titled Ukraine Must Win the Unwinnable War, in which he openly urged Iran to assassinate Donald Trump. Despite this extremist rhetoric, the Biden administration failed to take the necessary steps to neutralize this obvious threat to national security.

The horrific events of this past Sunday should have never happened. As former President Trump played golf in Florida, Secret Service agents noticed suspicious movement in the bushes near the course. Upon investigation, the agents spotted Routh armed with an AK-47-style rifle equipped with a scope. The suspect was immediately fired upon by the Secret Service but managed to flee the scene, only to be apprehended later on I-95.

Upon searching the area where Routh had been hiding, authorities discovered two backpacks filled with ceramic tiles and a GoPro camera, clear signs of premeditated intent to carry out the assassination. According to reports, Routh had been camping out on the perimeter of the golf course for 12 hours ahead of time, waiting for the perfect moment to strike.

This attempted assassination comes on the heels of a previous attempt in July when a gunman fired a bullet that narrowly missed Trump’s head. How many more times will it take before the Biden administration recognizes the grave threat to Trump’s life?

It is deeply concerning that an individual like Routh, who was so obviously flagged as a danger, was allowed to roam free, ultimately leading to an attempted assassination of a former president. The Biden administration’s failure to act on these warnings shows a dangerous level of incompetence and irresponsibility.

The question must be asked: Was this a case of neglect, or was there a more insidious motive behind DHS’s refusal to investigate Routh further? Given the ongoing political persecution of Trump and his supporters by the radical left, it’s not far-fetched to wonder if the Biden administration simply didn’t care to protect a political opponent like Trump.

This administration has made it clear that they will stop at nothing to undermine Trump, and their neglect in this case may very well be another example of their disregard for justice when it comes to protecting conservative figures.

The attempted assassination of a former president is not something that should be taken lightly. Yet, by ignoring the warnings about Routh, the Biden administration has demonstrated a shocking disregard for Trump’s safety and the safety of all Americans. It is clear that their priorities are woefully misplaced, allowing dangerous individuals like Routh to slip through the cracks while focusing on political witch hunts and weaponizing government agencies against their opponents.

This case also exposes the broader issue of national security failures under the Biden administration. If a dangerous individual like Routh can so easily evade scrutiny, who else is slipping through the cracks? The American people deserve answers, and more importantly, they deserve a government that takes these threats seriously.

The near-tragedy of this second assassination attempt on Donald Trump is a direct result of the Biden administration’s failure to act on clear warnings. The negligence shown by the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, and other agencies should alarm every American, regardless of political affiliation.

At the end of the day, it is the responsibility of the government to protect its citizens, especially a former president. In this case, the Biden administration has shown that it is either incapable or unwilling to fulfill that responsibility. The American people deserve better leadership—leadership that prioritizes safety and security over political games.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

The Radical media hates Trump and cannot help but spread lies about him. However, the truth comes out anyway.

And now the Radical media has been forced to admit this about Donald Trump.

In a telling moment on CBS News’ “CBS Mornings,” reporter Adriana Diaz gave a surprising update from the battleground state of Nevada that is sure to shock the liberal establishment.

While traveling through the Silver State, Diaz interviewed voters at local restaurants, and her findings were nothing short of remarkable. Despite the mainstream media’s relentless attempts to downplay Donald Trump’s popularity, Diaz couldn’t avoid the reality on the ground: Americans are excited about Trump.

The CBS segment, part of a series called “Three Meals,” seeks to take the pulse of voters leading up to the 2024 election by visiting various states and dining with residents. This week’s stop was Nevada, and while Diaz expected a wide variety of political opinions, what she found was a wave of enthusiasm for the former president, even in areas that have traditionally leaned Democratic.

Adriana Diaz’s revelation is striking for a number of reasons, but the most glaring one is the setting: mainstream media has largely written off Trump as a figure of the past, a leader whose political career should have been dead and buried after 2020.

Yet, as Diaz ventured into Nevada’s restaurants and engaged with ordinary people, the narrative spun by the radical left and their media allies was turned on its head. As Diaz herself admitted, “People are really excited about Trump.”

It wasn’t just one or two isolated conversations, either. Diaz and her crew traveled across Nevada, visiting multiple locations, asking people what matters most to them and who they support in the upcoming election. The overwhelming response was the same: support for Trump. Even more remarkable, according to Diaz, they could only find one supporter of Vice President Kamala Harris in all the restaurants they visited.

As Diaz explored the state, she uncovered a range of concerns that are driving voters toward Trump. One woman, when asked what was most important to her, gave a blunt and straightforward answer: “I’m extremely concerned about the border.”

This is a sentiment shared by millions of Americans who have watched, in horror, as the Biden-Harris administration has allowed chaos to reign at the southern border.

Under Biden and Harris, the United States has seen record numbers of illegal crossings, fentanyl trafficking, and human smuggling operations. The border is a disaster zone, and it’s clear that voters in battleground states like Nevada are paying attention.

Trump’s policies on border security, including his efforts to build the wall and implement stricter immigration enforcement, are resonating now more than ever.

Another telling moment came when a local food truck owner discussed the devastating impact inflation has had on his business. “Tacos used to be a dollar, $1.50, after the pandemic they don’t go under $3.50 to $4,” he said. The rising cost of food, housing, and everyday goods has hit working-class Americans hard. Bidenomics, with its reckless spending and anti-growth policies, has only exacerbated the situation.

For many, the answer to these economic woes is clear: bring back Trump and his proven economic policies that led to one of the strongest economies in modern history.

What’s particularly interesting about Diaz’s report is the clear enthusiasm for Trump, even in areas where Democrats have typically performed well. Nevada’s Latino community, which represents more than 20% of the state’s electorate, has long been a reliable voting bloc for the Democratic Party. But even here, Diaz found that voters are turning to Trump.

The Latino vote has become increasingly important in national elections, and in 2020, Trump made significant inroads with Latino voters. His strong stance on law and order, jobs, and economic opportunity resonated with many in this community.

Now, as the Biden administration continues to fumble on the economy, inflation, and border security, it’s no surprise that more and more Latinos are flocking to Trump’s America First message.

In fact, as Diaz’s report shows, Trump’s support cuts across all demographics. Whether it’s the border, inflation, jobs, or just a desire for strong leadership, Trump is the one people are looking to for answers. Diaz herself acknowledged that despite the numerous interviews conducted, only one Harris supporter could be found, and the enthusiasm for Trump was undeniable.

For CBS News—a mainstream outlet that typically skews to the left—this report was a rare and unfiltered look at the state of the electorate. The fact that a reporter from CBS was forced to admit that “people are really excited about Trump” speaks volumes about where America is heading as we approach the 2024 election.

Even in a network that has long been critical of Trump, the excitement for the former president is so obvious that it simply can’t be ignored. The mainstream media can try to suppress the excitement for Trump all they want, but as this report shows, it’s bubbling to the surface in places they least expected.

This enthusiasm for Trump comes at a time when the radical left is desperately trying to control the narrative. They’ve spent years demonizing Trump, falsely accusing him of everything under the sun, and attempting to frame him as an authoritarian. Yet, even as they’ve tried to bury his legacy, Trump has only grown stronger.

From Nevada to Florida, Ohio to Pennsylvania, and everywhere in between, the movement that Trump started is alive and well. The excitement for Trump’s return to the White House is palpable. And it’s not just among die-hard conservatives—it’s spreading among independents, working-class voters, and even former Democrats who are fed up with the incompetence and failure of the Biden-Harris administration.

The mainstream media can continue to push their anti-Trump agenda, but as Adriana Diaz’s report from Nevada shows, they can’t hide the truth: America is excited for Trump. Whether it’s concerns about the border, frustration with rising costs, or simply a desire for a leader who puts America first, voters are making it clear that they want Trump back in office.

The radical left and their allies in the media will undoubtedly try to downplay this enthusiasm, but it’s too big to ignore. Even CBS News, a network not known for being friendly to Trump, had to acknowledge that the people they spoke with are eager for Trump’s return.

In the coming months, as more reports like this come to light, it will become even more obvious: Trump’s support is not only strong, it’s growing. The silent majority is not so silent anymore, and they’re ready to take their country back.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The media wants to convince us that the Democrat party is unified against Trump. But that is simply not the case.

And a Democrat Senator has betrayed his party and threatened a massive subpoena.

Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) has threatened to use his committee’s subpoena power to force the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to comply with an investigation into two recent assassination attempts on former President Donald Trump.

As chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI), Blumenthal has taken an unusually aggressive stance against a department operating under the Biden-Harris administration, accusing DHS of “stonewalling” and failing to provide critical information needed to fully understand the failures that allowed these attempts on Trump’s life.

The two assassination attempts—just weeks apart—have not only shaken the political world but also revealed disturbing lapses in security protocols. These failures, combined with the DHS’s refusal to cooperate fully with the investigation, have raised serious concerns about the department’s commitment to transparency and the protection of high-profile political figures like Trump, who remains a leading candidate for the Republican nomination in 2024.

On July 13, a gunman’s bullet grazed Trump’s ear during a public appearance, narrowly missing the back of his head. While the Secret Service acted quickly to neutralize the threat, questions immediately arose about how the gunman had been able to get so close to the former president in the first place.

Just two months later, a second attempt on Trump’s life took place on September 15. Ryan Wesley Routh, a 58-year-old Democratic activist, was arrested after attempting to assassinate Trump with an AK-style firearm. Reports indicate that Routh had been camping near Trump’s West Palm Beach golf course for 12 hours, waiting for the opportunity to strike.

This second attempt raised even more questions about the competence of the Secret Service and DHS in protecting a former president who remains a central figure in American politics.

Both attempts have sparked outrage, not just among Trump supporters but across the political spectrum. Even Blumenthal, a Democrat who often clashed with Trump during his presidency, expressed frustration with the apparent lapses in security and the DHS’s lack of cooperation with his committee’s investigation.

In a rare move for a Democratic senator, Blumenthal has openly criticized the DHS, accusing the department of dragging its feet and withholding key information from his committee.

Speaking on Monday, Blumenthal described the DHS’s behavior as “almost derelict in its duty by resisting our requests for documents, evidence, and information that are necessary to investigate.”

Blumenthal’s frustration with the Biden-Harris administration is palpable. As the senior Democrat leading the probe, he has repeatedly asked for documentation and cooperation from DHS, yet has been met with delay tactics and excuses. His calls for transparency have been brushed off, and it’s clear that the senator is losing patience.

“We may need to require more cooperation from them. And we have the power to do so through the compulsory process. In other words, the subpoena power,” Blumenthal warned. His remarks came just days after he said that the DHS’s refusal to be forthcoming was not only an affront to his committee but to the American people, who deserve answers about how such high-profile security breaches were allowed to occur.

The fact that a senior Democrat is threatening to subpoena a department run by his own party’s administration is nothing short of extraordinary. It reveals just how serious the situation has become, and how deep the divide between political factions has grown, even within the Democratic Party.

For Blumenthal to take such a public stance against the Biden-Harris DHS suggests that the stonewalling is more than just bureaucratic inefficiency—it may be a deliberate attempt to avoid accountability.

Blumenthal has already hinted that his committee’s report on the first assassination attempt will be both shocking and appalling. He told Fox News, “I think the American people are going to be shocked, astonished, and appalled by what we will report to them about the failures by the Secret Service in this assassination attempt on the former president.”

This is a stunning statement from a senior senator, especially one who is not known for being friendly toward Trump. It underscores just how grave the security lapses were and raises the possibility that the failures weren’t just isolated incidents but symptoms of deeper, systemic problems within the agencies responsible for protecting high-profile political figures.

The DHS and Secret Service have long been considered pillars of national security, entrusted with protecting current and former presidents from harm. Yet, under the current administration, those agencies appear to have failed miserably in their duties.

How could a gunman get close enough to the former president to graze his ear with a bullet? How could a political activist, armed with an assault rifle, camp near Trump’s golf course for hours without being detected?

These questions demand answers. But instead of cooperating fully with the investigation, the DHS has chosen to stonewall, offering only partial information and delaying the process at every turn.

Blumenthal’s frustration is understandable. He’s leading a probe that could reveal profound weaknesses in the nation’s security apparatus, and yet the very agency responsible for those failures is refusing to be transparent. This is a national security issue, plain and simple. If the DHS can’t protect a former president, who can they protect?

The refusal of the DHS to fully cooperate with the investigation raises a disturbing question: Is the Biden-Harris administration more interested in protecting itself than protecting the former president?

Trump is not just any former president—he’s the frontrunner for the Republican nomination in 2024, and his continued political relevance makes him a target for both political and physical attacks.

While Blumenthal’s investigation focuses on security failures, the political implications cannot be ignored. The Biden-Harris administration has been relentless in its attacks on Trump, both politically and through various legal channels. Could their reluctance to cooperate with the investigation into the assassination attempts be part of a broader strategy to weaken Trump’s chances in 2024?

It’s a disturbing thought, but one that cannot be ruled out. After all, this is the same administration that has used every tool at its disposal to undermine Trump’s political career. From the multiple investigations and indictments to the non-stop negative media coverage, it’s clear that the Biden-Harris team sees Trump as their primary political opponent. Could the stonewalling by the DHS be part of that effort?

Blumenthal’s threat to use subpoena power is a sign that he’s not willing to let this issue go. The American people deserve to know the truth about what happened during the two assassination attempts on Trump’s life, and why the agencies tasked with protecting him failed so spectacularly.

If Blumenthal follows through on his threat, it could force the DHS to finally provide the information that has been so sorely lacking. But even if the DHS is compelled to cooperate, the damage has already been done. The stonewalling has cast a shadow over the Biden-Harris administration and raised serious doubts about their commitment to transparency and accountability.

At the end of the day, this isn’t just about Trump—it’s about the integrity of our national security apparatus. If the DHS can’t be trusted to protect a former president, what does that say about their ability to protect the nation?

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story and more.

Ever since being announced as Harris’ VP pick, Tim Walz has been in the spotlight. And his lies and horrible leadership have been exposed.

But now, Tim Walz has shocked the world with a new stunning display of incompetence.

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, now the Democratic nominee for Vice President alongside Kamala Harris, had a moment of glaring incompetence this week that left voters shaking their heads.

In an interview with a local CBS affiliate in Macon, Georgia, Walz was asked a simple yet crucial question: What would he and Kamala Harris do to help families struggling financially?

Instead of offering concrete solutions, Walz fumbled through a series of unrelated talking points, showcasing the Harris-Walz campaign’s glaring lack of a plan.

Reporter: "What do you tell people who wake up each morning wondering 'How am I going to get by financially?'"

Timothy Walz: Kamala and I are middle class folks. pic.twitter.com/uCEs7QfDnZ

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) September 17, 2024

The question posed to Walz should have been an easy one. With inflation skyrocketing, families across America are desperately seeking leadership that can offer real relief. But when asked for specifics on how he and Harris plan to help these struggling families, Walz’s response was nothing short of a disaster.

Rather than addressing the economic pain that everyday Americans are feeling, Walz offered a laundry list of proposals that either had nothing to do with inflation or were already part of Trump’s legacy.

Walz’s response started with an attempt to connect with middle-class families by claiming he and Kamala Harris understood their struggles. “I tell them Kamala Harris and I know something about it being middle-class folks. Our family sit at the table trying to pay the bill,” he said.

It was a patronizing and out-of-touch statement from someone who has spent most of his adult life in politics, not dealing with the harsh realities facing average Americans. His vague attempt at empathy quickly dissolved into a series of unrelated talking points that showed just how disconnected he and Harris are from the actual concerns of the American people.

Instead of addressing the elephant in the room—inflation—Walz offered a response that read like a laundry list of Democrat pet projects. He started by talking about home ownership, saying: “I think that’s why Kamala Harris has put out a plan — especially around home ownership — making sure we’re building 3 million more affordable homes, making sure we’re making the down payment assistance there.”

But what does building homes have to do with families struggling to pay their bills now? Home ownership is a worthy goal, but for families living paycheck to paycheck, dealing with skyrocketing grocery prices and utility bills, it’s not a solution that helps them today.

In fact, under the Biden-Harris administration, housing prices have surged, making home ownership less attainable for many Americans. Building homes is a long-term policy initiative, not an immediate answer to the inflationary crisis crippling the American middle class.

Walz then pivoted to another unrelated issue: lowering drug prices. While that sounds good on the surface, Walz conveniently forgot to mention that President Donald Trump had already taken significant steps to lower drug prices during his administration.

The Harris-Walz campaign is taking credit for initiatives they didn’t even start, and what’s worse, they’re falsely claiming it as a solution to an economic problem they’ve made worse.

Walz’s most glaring disconnect came when he began to tout infrastructure investments, claiming, “We’re investing in rural communities like the Investment Acts that have created a lot of new jobs in terms of infrastructure and other things. Those are things that we start to get a handle on it.” Infrastructure spending, again, is a long-term project. While improving roads and bridges is important, it does little to address the immediate financial woes that American families are grappling with today.

Moreover, the Biden-Harris administration’s so-called progress on infrastructure has been embarrassingly slow. Three years in, and they’ve managed to install just eight charging stations for electric vehicles. If that’s their measure of success, it’s no wonder families feel abandoned.

Walz’s inability to offer a direct, meaningful response to the question of inflation isn’t just a slip-up. It’s a clear indication that the Harris-Walz ticket has no concrete plan to fix the economic mess they’ve helped create. Instead of offering solutions, Walz delivered a series of tired Democrat talking points that don’t even begin to address the real concerns of Americans.

Perhaps most revealing of all was Walz’s blatant lie about Donald Trump’s approach to dealing with inflation. Walz claimed, falsely, that Trump’s plan involved a “national sales tax.” This is a complete fabrication. Trump has never proposed a national sales tax.

Instead, what Walz is referring to is Trump’s use of tariffs, which were aimed at protecting American industries and creating jobs at home—an approach that helped boost the American economy before Biden and Harris took office and began to unravel the progress.

Trump’s tariffs were part of a broader economic policy designed to put America first, securing jobs for American workers and ensuring that American industries weren’t being undercut by foreign competitors. Yet, Walz chose to distort the truth in a pathetic attempt to smear Trump, hoping that voters wouldn’t know the difference.

In reality, Biden and Harris have kept many of Trump’s tariffs in place and even increased some, recognizing their necessity. But instead of being honest, Walz and Harris are opting to spread falsehoods, hoping to distract from their own policy failures.

Walz’s incoherent response during the interview is emblematic of the broader Harris-Walz campaign. It’s a campaign of empty promises, half-truths, and blatant lies. They claim to care about the middle class, but their policies have only made life harder for everyday Americans. From inflation to housing prices to rising crime, the Harris-Walz ticket has shown that they are out of touch with the real needs of the American people.

It’s not just that Walz didn’t have an answer in the moment—it’s that he couldn’t have an answer, because he and Kamala Harris don’t have a plan. They can offer all the long-term proposals they want, but none of it addresses the immediate struggles families are facing under their leadership.

What we saw in that interview wasn’t just a candidate stumbling over his words—it was a candidate revealing the utter lack of vision, leadership, and competence that he and Kamala Harris bring to the table. And if this is the best they have to offer, Americans should be very concerned about what the future holds under their leadership.

As the 2024 election approaches, voters are being presented with a clear choice. On one hand, you have the Harris-Walz ticket—a duo that can’t even answer simple questions about the economy, let alone offer real solutions. On the other hand, you have candidates like Donald Trump, who not only have a track record of putting America first but also have a clear vision for how to restore the economic prosperity that has been lost under Biden and Harris.

The American people deserve leaders who understand their struggles and have the courage to take bold action to address them. Tim Walz and Kamala Harris have proven that they are not those leaders. It’s time for a change. America can’t afford four more years of empty promises and failed policies.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

Many Americans understand the growing threat from China. But the Radical Left continues to ignore it.

Now a new report has highlighted a major and unexpected threat from China that can no longer be ignored.

As the Biden administration accelerates its push for electric vehicles (EVs) to combat climate change, it’s opening the door wide to Communist China’s expanding influence in the American car market.

A recent report from the China Strategic Risks Institute (CSRI) warns that the U.S. reliance on Chinese-made EVs could undermine domestic manufacturing and create serious national security vulnerabilities. The report also suggests that these Chinese EVs could be “weaponized” by Beijing, posing grave risks to America’s economic and security interests.

For years, the U.S. auto industry has been a critical driver of the nation’s economy, employing nearly one million people in manufacturing and related sectors. But with President Biden’s lax approach to regulating EV imports, particularly from China, the future of domestic car manufacturing could be at risk.

According to the CSRI report, Chinese-made EVs are rapidly gaining ground in the American market, thanks to state-subsidized production that allows Chinese manufacturers to produce millions of low-cost vehicles annually. This threatens American carmakers, who are already struggling to meet the high production costs associated with the EV transition.

The influx of cheap Chinese vehicles is not just a short-term economic concern. If current trends continue, Chinese companies could dominate the U.S. electric vehicle market, pushing American manufacturers to the sidelines.

The Biden administration’s failure to impose tariffs or restrictions on these vehicles, in contrast to the European Union’s policy, could spell disaster for U.S. jobs and long-term economic competitiveness.

The numbers speak for themselves: in just four years, Chinese-made EVs have gone from a tiny fraction of the U.S. market to capturing significant market share.

This is a direct result of China’s aggressive subsidies, which allow them to flood foreign markets with underpriced products. While Biden touts the importance of green energy, his administration’s hands-off approach is jeopardizing the very American workers he claims to champion.

The economic dangers of Chinese-made EVs are substantial, but the potential national security risks are even more alarming. The CSRI report highlights that many Chinese electric vehicles come equipped with Cellular Internet of Things Modules (CIMs) manufactured in China. These modules, which are essential for the functioning of EVs, could be used by the Chinese government to collect sensitive data on American drivers.

China’s national security laws compel companies to share any data they collect with the state. This means that every Chinese-made EV on American roads could potentially be transmitting private data back to Beijing.

From a security standpoint, this is a nightmare scenario. The potential for espionage is vast—Beijing could gather detailed information about the driving habits, locations, and even personal communications of millions of Americans.

But it doesn’t stop there. According to the CSRI report, these modules could potentially allow China to remotely control or disable vehicles. Imagine a future where Chinese-made EVs are a common sight on American highways—and Beijing has the power to shut them down or interfere with their operations. This kind of control would give the Chinese Communist Party enormous leverage over the U.S. in times of conflict or political tension.

The situation with Chinese-made EVs bears a disturbing resemblance to the controversy surrounding Huawei’s involvement in America’s telecommunications infrastructure.

Huawei, another Chinese tech giant, was accused of embedding backdoors in its equipment that could allow for spying or sabotage. After significant pressure from security experts, the U.S. eventually banned Huawei from its 5G networks.

The Biden administration appears to have learned little from the Huawei case. Despite clear warnings from the CSRI and other experts, Biden has failed to take decisive action to curb the influx of Chinese EVs. The administration’s silence on the matter is baffling, especially given that this issue threatens not just the economy, but the very safety of American citizens.

Much like the Huawei situation, the threat from Chinese-made EVs is being ignored at the highest levels of government. The lack of scrutiny over these vehicles could result in serious security vulnerabilities for the U.S., leaving the country open to potential blackmail or even technological sabotage from Beijing.

To protect both the economic and national security interests of the United States, the CSRI has laid out several recommendations for the federal government. The Biden administration should act swiftly to implement these measures:

Impose Tariffs and Import Restrictions on Chinese EVs: Similar to the European Union, the U.S. should place tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles to protect American manufacturers from unfair competition. This would also help curb the country’s growing dependence on foreign EVs and reduce the risk of economic disruption.

Mandate Strict Data Security Requirements for Foreign EVs: Any foreign-manufactured electric vehicle sold in the U.S. should be subject to stringent data security regulations. This would include banning any transmission of data overseas and requiring transparency about the source code of foreign vehicles. Regular inspections of data storage facilities should be conducted to ensure compliance.

Investigate Chinese State Subsidies: An investigation into China’s massive state subsidies for its EV sector is long overdue. Such an inquiry would allow the U.S. to better understand the scope of China’s unfair trade practices and determine whether further action, such as countervailing duties, is necessary.

Provide Support for American Manufacturers: The federal government should offer direct subsidies to American carmakers, or incentivize consumers to purchase American-made EVs. By doing so, the government can boost domestic production, reduce dependency on China, and ensure that American workers are not left behind in the green energy transition.

The Biden administration’s approach to electric vehicles could have far-reaching consequences for the country’s economic and national security. By allowing Communist China to flood the market with cheap, state-subsidized EVs, the administration is setting the stage for long-term dependency on an adversarial nation.

The risks are clear: without swift action, America’s domestic car industry could be decimated, leaving the U.S. reliant on a foreign power for a critical part of its transportation infrastructure. Even more concerning is the potential for Chinese-made EVs to be used as tools of espionage or sabotage, giving Beijing unprecedented control over the everyday lives of millions of Americans.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The entire Biden family surrounds itself with crazy and extreme liberals. But it seems that some of that might be changing.

Because a former Hunter associate has spoken out in support of Trump.

In a shocking twist, Hunter Biden’s former business partner and longtime confidant, Devon Archer, has reportedly aligned himself with former President Donald Trump and the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement.

Archer’s shift in political loyalty, as reported by the National Pulse, has sent shockwaves through political circles, raising questions about the integrity of the Biden family and the future of the Biden presidency.

Archer’s decision to support Trump was made public by Lori Mills, a Republican Party committeewoman in Ventura County, California, who posted a photo on X (formerly Twitter) showing Archer attending a Beverly Hills fundraiser for Trump. Mills wrote, “Great time tonight at President Trump’s Fundraiser in Beverly Hills! Did you know Hunter Biden’s old business partner is now MAGA? Can’t blame him!”

Great time tonight at President Trumps Fundraiser in Beverly Hills! Did you know Hunter Biden’s old business partner is now MAGA? Can’t blame him! pic.twitter.com/7NuetutcVF

— Lori Mills (@LoriMills4CA42) September 13, 2024

This revelation comes at a crucial time for the Biden administration, as the House of Representatives ramps up its investigation into Hunter Biden’s business activities and their connection to President Joe Biden. Archer has already provided damning testimony to Congress, admitting that Hunter frequently put his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, on the phone during business meetings.

Archer’s insider knowledge has become a key component in the House’s ongoing impeachment inquiry, which alleges that Joe Biden used his political office for the financial benefit of his son and other family members.

Devon Archer has been a central figure in the unraveling saga of Hunter Biden’s shady business dealings, particularly during Joe Biden’s tenure as vice president under President Barack Obama. Archer served on the board of Burisma, the controversial Ukrainian energy company that paid Hunter Biden tens of thousands of dollars per month despite his lack of relevant experience.

During his testimony before House committees, Archer revealed that Hunter often used his father’s political influence to advance their business interests. Most shockingly, Archer testified that Joe Biden participated in at least 20 business-related calls while serving as vice president, casting a shadow over the White House’s insistence that President Biden was not involved in his son’s business ventures.

This direct connection between Joe Biden and his son’s foreign dealings has fueled accusations that the current president abused his office for personal gain. Republicans in Congress have pushed forward with an impeachment inquiry, which continues to unearth new evidence of corruption within the Biden family.

While Democrats dismiss the investigations as politically motivated, Archer’s testimony—and now his open support for Trump—adds another layer of credibility to the mounting allegations against the president.

The fact that Devon Archer, once one of Hunter Biden’s closest business associates, is now a supporter of Donald Trump suggests that even those closest to the Bidens are beginning to recognize the gravity of the situation. Archer’s decision to switch sides can be seen as a sign that the walls are closing in on Joe Biden, as more and more individuals with firsthand knowledge of the Bidens’ business dealings come forward with damaging information.

Despite the growing evidence against him, Joe Biden and his allies in the media have largely downplayed the significance of Archer’s testimony. The White House has continued to insist that Joe Biden had no involvement in his son’s business activities, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

In fact, President Biden’s administration has gone on the offensive, attempting to frame the impeachment inquiry as a partisan attack orchestrated by Republicans to distract from Trump’s legal troubles.

However, the facts tell a different story. Archer’s revelations have painted a picture of a deeply corrupt political family, willing to exploit the power and prestige of the vice presidency for personal financial gain. The House of Representatives continues to uncover evidence of the Biden family’s foreign entanglements, including questionable business deals in China, Ukraine, and elsewhere.

Meanwhile, the mainstream media has done little to hold the president accountable, further fueling the perception that the Biden family is protected by powerful forces within the establishment.

Adding to the growing disillusionment with the Biden administration is the president’s own handling of the legal troubles surrounding Hunter Biden. Earlier this year, Hunter pleaded guilty to three felony charges, including tax evasion and unlawful possession of a firearm.

When asked whether President Biden would consider pardoning his son, the White House issued a statement saying that Joe Biden would not pardon Hunter, a move that critics argue was designed to distance the president from the scandal. But for many Americans, this hollow gesture does little to erase the perception that the Biden family has long operated under a different set of rules than the rest of the country.

Devon Archer’s open support for Trump is a major blow to the Biden camp, especially as the 2024 presidential election approaches. Archer’s decision to attend a Trump fundraiser in Beverly Hills suggests that he has not only distanced himself from the Bidens but has also embraced the political movement that stands in stark opposition to everything Joe Biden represents.

Archer’s presence at the fundraiser sends a clear message: even those who were once deeply entrenched in the Biden family’s business dealings are now turning their backs on the president.

The timing of Archer’s political shift is particularly significant. As Trump continues to solidify his position as the frontrunner for the Republican nomination, Archer’s endorsement provides additional momentum for the MAGA movement. Trump’s message of “draining the swamp” and holding corrupt politicians accountable resonates with millions of Americans who are fed up with the entrenched political class in Washington, D.C.

Archer’s support for Trump underscores the growing frustration with the Biden administration’s failure to deliver on its promises of transparency and accountability.

In many ways, Archer’s switch to the Trump camp is emblematic of a larger trend in American politics. More and more Americans, disillusioned by the failures of the Biden administration and the corruption within the Democratic Party, are flocking to Trump’s message of America First. The MAGA movement, which began as a populist revolt against the political establishment, has now become the dominant force in conservative politics, with Trump at its helm.

The question now is whether the House’s impeachment inquiry will lead to real consequences for Joe Biden. Despite Archer’s testimony and the growing body of evidence linking the president to his son’s business dealings, Democrats in Congress remain staunchly opposed to any efforts to hold Biden accountable.

Meanwhile, the mainstream media continues to provide cover for the president, downplaying the significance of the investigations and dismissing Archer’s revelations as politically motivated.

However, with Devon Archer now firmly in the Trump camp, it becomes increasingly difficult for Biden and his allies to sweep these allegations under the rug. Archer’s defection adds another layer of legitimacy to the impeachment inquiry, as it shows that even those closest to the Bidens are willing to break ranks and speak out against the corruption that has long plagued the Biden family.

As the 2024 election approaches, the American people will have a choice to make. Will they continue to tolerate the corruption and abuse of power that has defined the Biden administration? Or will they turn to Donald Trump, a leader who has promised to clean up Washington and restore accountability to the federal government? The answer to that question may well determine the future of the country.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Radical Left has a habit of making dangerous comments about their political opponents. But a major line has been crossed.

And Hillary Clinton’s horrific anti-Trump comments have even Democrats worried.

In a concerning display of disregard for political violence, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appeared on MSNBC just one day after an assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, only to downplay the incident and call for the media to create a more consistent narrative of how “dangerous” Trump is.

During the interview with Rachel Maddow, Clinton’s comments laid bare the growing radicalism within the Democratic Party, which seems more interested in vilifying Trump than addressing real threats to democracy—like the attempted murder of a former president.

Hillary Clinton: "I don't understand why it's so difficult for the press to have a consistent narrative about how dangerous Trump is." pic.twitter.com/1JharBsBWN

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) September 17, 2024

While Democrats like Clinton continue to preach about “protecting democracy,” their actions tell a different story. The failure to even acknowledge the gravity of the assassination attempt, and instead push an agenda to increase hostility toward Trump, is a clear indicator of how far the radical Left is willing to go in its war against conservative values.

The dangerous rhetoric being employed against Trump is nothing new, but the call to ignore violence against political opponents reaches a new, alarming low.

Clinton’s comments are telling. Rather than focusing on the assassination attempt, she instead complained about how the media isn’t doing enough to consistently attack Trump. “I don’t understand why it’s so difficult for the press to have a consistent narrative about how dangerous Trump is,” Clinton told Maddow.

The former Secretary of State went on to say that the media “careens from one outrage to the next” and that Trump’s “demagoguery” should be the singular focus of coverage.

This is the same Clinton who once claimed that civility should be restored to politics. However, her words now reveal a stark contrast—she is calling for an even more intense media campaign to portray Trump as a danger to the nation while completely ignoring the violent rhetoric and actions taken by the Left against the former president.

Clinton even went as far as to say that Trump has disqualified himself from office “over and over again,” while insisting that the media and the American people need to take him both “seriously and literally.”

But what about the real and literal violence being directed at Trump? Where is the media’s outcry over the fact that a Democrat, Ryan Wesley Routh, was able to get onto the golf course where Trump was playing and come within 400 yards of him with a firearm? Instead of addressing this clear act of political violence, the Left continues to focus on attacking Trump’s character and portraying him as a danger to democracy.

The assassination attempt on Trump is not an isolated incident—it is part of a larger trend of escalating political violence, often inspired by the very rhetoric that Clinton and others on the Left spew on a daily basis.

Earlier in the day, even as the attempt on Trump’s life was fresh in the news, the liberal media questioned whether Trump’s campaign would call for “toning down the violence,” despite the suspect having been identified as a Democrat who donated to ActBlue and had previously attempted to register foreign fighters to take up arms for Ukraine.

The suspect, Routh, was arrested after attempting to flee the scene of the crime. According to reports, U.S. Secret Service agents spotted his gun barrel through a chain-link fence near the edge of the golf course and opened fire. Routh fled the scene in an SUV, only to be arrested later in a neighboring county after a police shutdown of the highway. Yet, even with this clear and present danger to Trump’s life, there has been shockingly little outrage from the mainstream media or the Democratic establishment.

This lack of response is indicative of a broader problem within the Democratic Party and its allies in the media. Violence against conservatives, and particularly against Trump, is brushed aside, while even the smallest misstep by Trump or his supporters is blown out of proportion. The hypocrisy is staggering. On the one hand, the Left constantly rails against so-called “dangerous rhetoric” coming from Trump and his allies. On the other hand, they remain silent or even encourage violence when it is directed at him.

In her interview, Clinton didn’t just stop at calling for the media to increase their attacks on Trump. She went a step further, suggesting that Trump’s supporters could face civil or criminal penalties for what she called “propaganda.”

Clinton claimed that there needed to be a “deterrence” for Trump’s supporters, essentially advocating for the criminalization of political speech that doesn’t align with her worldview.

This is a dangerous path for any political leader to take, and it reveals just how authoritarian Clinton and her allies on the Left have become. By suggesting that Trump supporters should be punished for merely expressing their views, Clinton is promoting a form of censorship and intimidation that has no place in a free society. It’s one thing to disagree with Trump’s policies or rhetoric, but it’s another to call for legal penalties against his supporters simply for voicing their opinions.

Meanwhile, Trump’s campaign has released a list of all the violent rhetoric used by Democrats against the former president, a list that is pages long. From members of Congress openly calling for “uprisings” to leftist commentators encouraging violence against Trump supporters, the incitement is clear. Yet, when the violence actually occurs—as it did this past weekend—there is nothing but silence from the same people who once claimed to stand for civility and decency.

Democrats’ rhetoric inspired another attempt on President Trump’s life.

In case they forgot, we made a list👇 pic.twitter.com/PbwQ3q6sOf

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) September 16, 2024

Perhaps the most egregious part of Clinton’s interview was her claim that Trump is the one responsible for spreading dangerous rhetoric. She told Maddow that Americans need to reject the “chaos” that Trump represents, referring to his time in office as a period of “romance with dictators” that “put innocent lives at risk.”

But what about the chaos that the Left has stirred up with its own rhetoric? What about the lives that are put at risk by the violent language used by Democrats and their supporters?

The attempted assassination of Trump should have been a wake-up call for those who constantly push the narrative that Trump is a danger to the country. But instead of condemning the violence, Clinton used her platform to push even more division and hostility. Her failure to even acknowledge the assassination attempt speaks volumes about where the priorities of the Democratic Party lie.

It’s clear that the Left has no interest in reducing political violence or bringing the country together. Their focus is solely on demonizing Trump and anyone who supports him, regardless of the consequences. By failing to hold their own supporters accountable for acts of violence and by calling for more attacks on Trump in the media, Clinton and her allies are pushing the nation further toward division and unrest.

We cannot stand by and allow political violence to be normalized. Whether it’s an assassination attempt on a former president or the calls for legal penalties against his supporters, these actions are a threat to the very fabric of our democracy.

The mainstream media, along with Democrats like Hillary Clinton, must be held accountable for their role in stoking the flames of division and hatred.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.