The United States has plenty of enemies. And they’re always scheming.

But now the FBI uncovered a bombshell infiltration that could turn America upside down.

Uncovering a Chinese Plot to Tilt 2020

FBI Director Kash Patel dropped a bombshell on Congress, handing over a stack of documents exposing an alleged Chinese scheme to meddle in the 2020 election with thousands of fake US driver’s licenses.

The mainstream media might brush this off as old news, but Patel’s move rips the veil off a murky plot that reeks of foreign interference. A confidential source tipped off the FBI around August 2020, claiming the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aimed to use these bogus licenses to flood mail-in ballots for Joe Biden.

While details remain shadowy, the FBI’s own spokesperson confirmed to The New York Post that the plot was real enough to raise alarms, yet intelligence reports were mysteriously yanked before they could see daylight.

Patel, undeterred, declassified the report and shipped it to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) for a closer look. “The FBI has located documents which detail alarming allegations related to the 2020 U.S. election, including allegations of interference by the CCP,” Patel declared on X.

A Trail of Fake Licenses and Recalled Reports

The scale of the alleged scheme is staggering. Around the time the FBI caught wind of it, US Customs and Border Protection intercepted nearly 20,000 counterfeit driver’s licenses.

That’s no small number, especially when you consider Biden’s razor-thin victories in swing states like Arizona (10,000+ votes), Georgia (12,000+ votes), and Wisconsin (20,000+ votes).

Grassley, a longtime skeptic of the FBI’s handling of this intel, pushed for answers, suspecting the bureau didn’t dig deep enough despite the smoking gun of fake IDs. “Specifically, these include allegations of plans from the CCP to manufacture fake driver’s licenses and ship them into the United States for the purpose of facilitating fraudulent mail-in ballots — allegations which, while substantiated, were abruptly recalled and never disclosed to the public,” Patel told Just the News.

Grassley’s team confirmed they’ve got the documents, sparked by a whistleblower’s legally protected disclosures, and are now demanding the FBI explain why the original report was buried and by whom.

“Lastly, explain why the FBI under your predecessor required the original IIR to be destroyed, whether this practice is consistent with the FBI’s past and current practice, and how it comports with federal record preservation requirements,” Grassley pressed in a letter to Patel.

Patel’s Push for Transparency

Patel’s tenure at the FBI’s helm is shaking up the bureau’s secretive ways, and this document dump is proof. He’s vowed to drag long-hidden truths into the open, especially for lawmakers like Grassley who’ve battled the agency’s stonewalling.

The issue of fake Chinese-made IDs isn’t new—back in 2012, senators including Grassley and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) sounded alarms when 1,700 counterfeit licenses were nabbed at Chicago’s O’Hare Airport. Yet, the 2020 plot’s recall raises red flags about whether the FBI was complicit in sweeping it under the rug.

“Thanks to the oversight work and partnership of Chairman Grassley, the FBI continues to provide unprecedented transparency at the people’s Bureau,” Patel said.

Grassley’s camp is now pushing for more internal FBI communications to uncover who pulled the plug on the investigation and why.

The media has been attacking Trump for years. But they always pretended it was genuine journalism.

Now an ABC reporter said the quiet part out loud about mainstream media bias.

Shattering the Myth of Objectivity

Terry Moran, freshly ousted from ABC News, didn’t mince words in a raw Substack chat with The Bulwark’s Tim Miller. The former reporter, unceremoniously dumped after a fiery anti-Trump X post, scoffed at the sacred cow of journalistic “objectivity.”

Calling himself a “centrist” and “Hubert Humphrey Democrat,” Moran waved off right-wing critics who claim his outburst exposed a liberal bias festering in mainstream media.

“My own feeling is that you don’t sacrifice your citizenship as a journalist. Your job is not to be objective,” he said, dismantling the idea that reporters should be emotionless robots. He sneered at the notion of a “Mount Olympus of objectivity” where some elite class of scribes floats above society’s mess.

“We’re all in this together. What you have to be is fair and accurate,” he argued, pointing to his tense April interview with Trump as proof he can walk that line.

Backing Pelley’s Battle Cry

Moran didn’t stop at torching objectivity. He threw his full weight behind CBS News’ Scott Pelley, whose viral Wake Forest commencement speech last month lit up the internet for its unapologetic jab at the Trump administration.

“I thought Scott was absolutely spot on,” Moran said, reveling in his newfound freedom to “help in that good work.”

Pelley’s address was a Molotov cocktail, warning graduates of a creeping “insidious fear” strangling truth, DEI, and free speech.

“In this moment, this morning, our sacred rule of law is under attack. Journalism is under attack. Universities are under attack. Freedom of speech is under attack,” Pelley thundered, urging students to fight back against a government he implied was betraying Lincoln’s vision of “of the people, by the people, for the people.”

Moran, now unshackled from ABC’s leash, said Pelley’s words filled him with “joy” and a sense of purpose to join the resistance.

Owning the X Post That Ended It All

Moran’s June 8 X post, labeling Trump and Stephen Miller “world-class haters,” was the match that burned his ABC career to the ground. He doesn’t regret it.

“This, while very hot, is an observation, a description that is accurate and true,” he told Miller, defending his choice of “strong language” to call out Trump’s “venom and lies” that “debase” public discourse.

The post, since deleted, led to a swift suspension and then a pink slip from ABC, where he’d toiled since 1997. Reflecting on the fallout, Moran stood firm:

“I thought about it in my own conscience first. And I thought, as I tell you, I wrote it because I thought it was true. And at the end of the day, when all the bad stuff has happened, my children will know that whatever it means, it means that.” For Moran, the cost of speaking out was steep, but the truth was worth it.

Politicians should show some class. But not all of them always do.

Now a Democrat was caught on camera engaging in this disgusting act.

Lawmaker’s Reckless Post Fuels Outrage Over Political Violence

North Carolina State Rep. Julie von Haefen, a Democrat, ignited a firestorm by sharing a video on X from a Raleigh “No Kings” protest, featuring a grotesque image of a guillotine sign with what appeared to be President Donald Trump’s severed head adorned with a powdered wig, alongside another head marked with a swastika.

The post, which many viewed as glorifying violence, drew sharp condemnation, especially as American taxpayers fund the salaries of lawmakers expected to uphold civility, not inflame division.

“Political violence is not okay — the Left should stop encouraging it,” Rep. Mark Harris (R-NC) declared, echoing the sentiments of those appalled by von Haefen’s decision to amplify such imagery.

The Libs of TikTok account on X flagged the post as “sick,” tagging the FBI, prompting von Haefen to delete her X account and repost an edited version of the video on Facebook, omitting the offensive image.

Critics argue that taxpayers shouldn’t be footing the bill for elected officials who promote such inflammatory content, especially in a climate already scarred by political violence.

Von Haefen’s Backpedaling Amid Bipartisan Condemnation

Facing backlash, von Haefen issued a statement claiming, “Yesterday, I posted a video on social media containing crowd photos from the No Kings protest in Raleigh. One of the images of a protestor holding a sign was inappropriate, and I later edited the video to remove the photo.”

She referenced the tragic Minnesota shootings, where House Democrat leader Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed, adding, “Let me be clear: I condemn political violence in all forms.”

Yet, her initial decision to share the image—especially after two assassination attempts on Trump in 2024—has been slammed as tone-deaf and irresponsible.

“Her disgraceful behavior fails to meet the standards expected from House members and sets a dangerous precedent in an already volatile political climate,” said North Carolina House Speaker Destin Hall, who is exploring legal measures to address von Haefen’s actions.

The North Carolina GOP demanded her resignation, arguing that taxpayers deserve representatives who unite rather than divide. Von Haefen’s post, seen as endorsing violent imagery, has fueled calls for accountability, with critics noting that public funds should not support lawmakers who exacerbate tensions.

A Pattern of Provocation in a Taxpayer-Funded Arena

The controversy recalls comedian Kathy Griffin’s 2017 stunt, where she posed with a mock severed Trump head, sparking widespread outrage.

Von Haefen’s actions, coming from an elected official, carry even graver weight, especially as taxpayers fund the platform she misused. With political violence escalating—evidenced by the Minnesota tragedy and Trump’s near-assassinations—her post is seen as a betrayal of public trust.

“My focus remains on bringing people together and fighting for the values that matter to North Carolinians,” von Haefen claimed, but her critics argue that sharing such imagery undermines that goal and squanders taxpayer resources on divisive politics.

As Hall considers “next steps” to ensure such behavior isn’t repeated, the incident underscores a broader demand: elected officials, sustained by taxpayer dollars, must reject extremism and foster unity, not amplify dangerous rhetoric in an already polarized nation.

The United States hasn’t fought a major war in years. But that could change now.

Because the US Senate convened as the threat of war hit a critical level.

Congress Scrutinizes U.S. Role in Israel-Iran Conflict

As tensions flare between Israel and Iran, Capitol Hill is bracing for a heated debate on America’s involvement, with lawmakers demanding clarity on the extent of U.S. engagement and its implications for American taxpayers.

With the Senate reconvening after a weekend of missile strikes that began Thursday, bipartisan voices are pressing the Trump administration for answers on whether the U.S. is merely supporting Israel or risking deeper entanglement, potentially funding a conflict that could spiral without taxpayer consent.

“Bipartisan lawmakers have begun demanding answers from the administration about just ‘how involved’ the U.S. is in the strikes and the risks it poses for the nation,” sources note, as Congress seeks to ensure American resources aren’t dragged into another foreign war without oversight.

Lawmakers are wary of betraying President Trump’s “America First” pledge, which resonated with MAGA voters by promising to avoid costly overseas conflicts.

The deployment of U.S. refueling tankers to Europe, positioning them closer to the conflict zone, raises questions about whether taxpayers are indirectly footing the bill for a war they didn’t approve.

Balancing MAGA Principles with Support for Israel

President Trump’s handling of the crisis has garnered bipartisan support, but fault lines are emerging. Many MAGA supporters back Israel, yet they question how far U.S. involvement—both military and financial—should extend.

“Firstly, Trump campaigned on a platform of keeping the U.S. out of foreign entanglements. That pledge enthralled much of the MAGA base,” observers note, highlighting the tension between supporting an ally and preserving taxpayer resources for domestic priorities.

“Is the U.S. merely supporting Israel? Or is the U.S. more involved? And if that’s the case, at what point does Congress step in?” lawmakers are asking, emphasizing that any escalation must align with constitutional checks requiring congressional approval for war.

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) has introduced a war powers resolution to force a Senate debate and vote before any U.S. military action against Iran, ensuring taxpayers aren’t funding an unauthorized conflict. This move underscores the need to protect American resources from being siphoned into a potentially endless war.

Risks of Escalation and Taxpayer-Funded Consequences

Concerns are mounting that U.S. involvement could provoke retaliation, endangering American lives and assets.

“Moreover, there is concern that U.S. action could spark the risk of domestic terrorism in the U.S. – or strikes against American military and diplomatic assets overseas,” with soft targets like tourist hotspots also at risk. GOP lawmakers have warned Iran against retaliation, signaling that any attack would trigger a forceful U.S. response, potentially escalating costs to taxpayers.

“It is said you can’t be a little bit pregnant. But you can be a little bit at war,” sources quip, capturing the murky line between limited support and full-scale conflict.

Congress is now tasked with determining whether even limited U.S. involvement constitutes war, and whether American taxpayers should bear the financial burden of a conflict that could expand without their consent.

Kaine’s resolution aims to ensure that any escalation—military or financial—requires transparent congressional approval, safeguarding taxpayer dollars from funding a war that could spiral out of control.

The mainstream media has always had a strained relationship with the truth. At times, it’s as if they are just doing the bidding of Democrats.

And now CNN and MSNBC are totally embarrassed after being caught in a massive lie.

Media Missteps: CNN and MSNBC Downplay Anti-ICE Violence

CNN and MSNBC have faced sharp criticism for repeatedly labeling anti-ICE protests and riots across the U.S. as “mostly peaceful,” despite clear evidence of widespread unrest, according to a Media Research Center (MRC) study.

The networks’ insistence on this narrative, with 211 claims between June 7-11, glosses over violent incidents, including flash mob-style looting in Los Angeles, arson of police vehicles in New York City, and a car plowing through demonstrators in Chicago.

“No reporter acknowledged any link between the peaceful and violent elements of the crowds. The rioters were exclusively framed as ‘rogue actors,’ or ‘lone wolves,’ and there was never any assertion that they might share common cause with the more peaceful individuals,” said MRC’s Bill D’Agostino, who noted CNN’s 123 claims and MSNBC’s 88 overshadowed the reality of businesses boarding up and law enforcement making mass arrests.

Selective Reporting Ignores Escalating Chaos

The MRC study revealed that CNN and MSNBC consistently minimized the violence in cities like Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, Washington, North Carolina, Missouri, Texas, Indiana, Colorado, and Georgia, where anti-ICE protests turned destructive.

Videos and photos of torched police vehicles, vandalized businesses, and clashes with law enforcement flooded the internet, yet the networks stuck to their “mostly peaceful” mantra.

D’Agostino pointed out that only CNN’s Jake Tapper, on June 7, briefly referred to the Los Angeles chaos as a “riot.”

The networks’ refusal to connect the violent acts to the broader protests, instead blaming nebulous “rogue actors,” has drawn accusations of bias, particularly as they failed to note that the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines was targeted solely at the violent elements, not peaceful demonstrators.

National Guard and Marines Deployed Amid Media Silence

While CNN and MSNBC emphasized the “peaceful” nature of the protests, they largely ignored the necessity of federal intervention to curb the escalating violence.

“There was also no instance in which a reporter acknowledged that the National Guard and Marines had been mobilized exclusively to address the violent elements of the crowd,” D’Agostino observed, highlighting how the networks criticized the use of military force against “peaceful protesters” without acknowledging the context of looting, vandalism, and attacks on police.

This selective framing, coupled with the networks’ reluctance to label the unrest as riots, has fueled perceptions that CNN and MSNBC are more focused on pushing a narrative than reporting the full scope of the disorder, which has disrupted communities and strained law enforcement resources nationwide.

The Left doesn’t even try to hide it’s disdain for our country. Now they’re outright helping our enemies.

And a Democrat Governor handed the Chinese Communist Party this gift on a silver platter.

Hobbs’s Vetoes Spark Outrage Over Arizona’s China Policy

Governor Katie Hobbs is under fire from Republican lawmakers and national security advocates for repeatedly vetoing legislation aimed at countering Chinese influence in Arizona, most notably her rejection last week of a bill banning land purchases by entities tied to the Chinese government.

Facing fierce criticism, Hobbs introduced a revised version of the bill this week, expanding it to include other foreign adversaries and scrapping a provision that would have allowed Chinese entities to acquire property under certain conditions for three years.

Critics argue this is a calculated move to dodge accusations of being soft on China, especially since she vetoed another China-focused bill last month, for the second year in a row, which would have barred Arizona’s healthcare and research institutions from using genetic sequencing equipment and software from Chinese genomics firms like BGI Genomics, blacklisted by the Pentagon and Commerce Department for ties to Beijing’s military and human rights abuses.

“This bill is unnecessary,” Hobbs wrote in a brief May 2 veto letter, offering no further reasoning.

Critics Slam Hobbs for Leaving Arizona Vulnerable

The vetoes have drawn sharp rebukes, with Michael Lucci, founder of State Armor, criticizing Hobbs for blocking Rep. Leo Biasiucci’s efforts to protect Arizonans’ genomic data from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

“Rep. Leo Biasiucci worked hard to make Arizona the first state to protect its citizens’ genomic data from the CCP in 2024, but Governor Hobbs vetoed his bill,” Lucci told National Review, adding that nine other states—Texas, Arkansas, Kansas, Nebraska, Florida, Tennessee, Idaho, and soon Louisiana—have adopted similar measures with bipartisan support.

Lucci warned that Hobbs’s vetoes leave “Arizonan DNA exposed to a blacklisted CCP military company tied to genocide and involved in building genetically targeted weapons to harm Americans.”

Concerns are heightened by BGI’s reported ties to the People’s Liberation Army and experiments on minority groups, with figures like Sen. Tom Cotton and former Rep. Mike Gallagher flagging risks to national security, including potential bioweapons development.

Pattern of Vetoes and a Partial Reversal

Hobbs’s vetoes extend beyond genomics, as she also rejected bills this session banning Chinese-manufactured telecommunications technology and further restricting land purchases by CCP-linked entities.

She argued the telecom bill’s “broad language would create undue difficulty for the business community and generate costs to taxpayers” and cautioned that the land purchase bill could lead to “arbitrary enforcement.”

Lucci called her record unmatched, stating, “She has vetoed more legislation that would protect her state against the CCP than any other governor in the country,” noting some vetoes coincided with FBI arrests of CCP scientists for bioweapon-related activities.

In a rare shift, Hobbs signed the Arizona End Organ Harvesting Act last month, barring insurers from covering transplants involving Chinese organs, after vetoing it the previous year.

However, her office has not responded to National Review’s requests for comment, and her consistent rejection of other anti-China measures continues to fuel criticism that she is undermining Arizona’s security.

The Left can usually keep each other in line. But sometimes someone makes a mad dash.

And now a leading Democrat Senator broke ranks with his party to do the unthinkable.

U.S. Lawmakers Rally Behind Israel’s Strike on Iran

Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., voiced unwavering backing for Israel’s military action against Iran, urging the U.S. to supply its ally with all necessary resources.

“Our commitment to Israel must be absolute and I fully support this attack. Keep wiping out Iranian leadership and the nuclear personnel.

We must provide whatever is necessary—military, intelligence, weaponry—to fully back Israel in striking Iran,” Fetterman declared in a Thursday night X post, which was amplified by the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

House Speaker Mike Johnson echoed this sentiment, proclaiming, “Israel IS right—and has a right—to defend itself!” in a separate post shared by the ministry.

Calls for Decisive U.S. Action if Iran Retaliates

Sen. Lindsey Graham issued a bold warning to Iran, advocating for a crushing U.S. response should the nation target American interests.

“People are wondering if Iran will attack American military personnel or interests throughout the region because of Israel’s attack on Iran’s leadership and nuclear facilities,” Graham stated in an X post Thursday night.

“My answer is if they do, America should have an overwhelming response, destroying all of Iran’s oil refineries and oil infrastructure putting the ayatollah and his henchmen out of the oil business.”

Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio clarified that the U.S. was “not involved in strikes against Iran” but cautioned Iran against targeting U.S. personnel or interests.

Trump Pushes for Iran to Strike a Nuclear Deal

President Donald Trump took to Truth Social on Friday morning, pressing Iran to negotiate a nuclear deal to avoid further escalation.

“I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to ‘just do it,’ but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn’t get it done. I told them it would be much worse than anything they know, anticipated, or were told, that the United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come – And they know how to use it. Certain Iranian hardliner’s spoke bravely, but they didn’t know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and it will only get worse!” Trump wrote.

He warned of escalating “death and destruction” but urged Iran to act swiftly:

“Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE. God Bless You All!”

Musk has been in the news for all the wrong reasons lately. And this is the nail in the coffin.

Because his face went white after receiving a devastating test result.

Trump’s Graceful Response to Musk’s Apology

The fiery public spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, appears to be cooling, with signs of reconciliation emerging after Musk’s apology for his earlier attacks.

Musk, who served as a special White House advisor leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), admitted on X Wednesday, “I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.”

Trump, demonstrating his characteristic magnanimity, brushed off the feud in a New York Post podcast interview, stating, “Things like that happen. I don’t blame him for anything.”

Later, when pressed by reporters, the president downplayed the issue, saying, “I really haven’t thought too much about it,” showcasing his focus on governing over personal disputes. This olive branch highlights Trump’s ability to rise above conflict and maintain alliances critical to his administration’s bold agenda.

The feud erupted after Musk criticized Trump’s “big, beautiful bill,” calling it a “disgusting abomination” that risked unsustainable debt.

Musk’s inflammatory remarks, including an unsubstantiated claim about Trump’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein, briefly strained their once-close partnership.

Yet, Trump’s measured response and Musk’s retraction signal a mutual desire to move forward, reinforcing the president’s knack for fostering unity among key supporters.

Musk’s GOP Support Softens but Remains Strong

A Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday shows that Musk’s standing among Republicans has taken a hit, with 62% holding a favorable opinion, down from 78% in March.

Among all voters, only 30% view Musk favorably, with 57% unfavorable, a six-point drop from March.

Critics attribute this decline to Musk’s recent attacks on Trump, including his claim that Trump owed his 2024 election victory to Musk’s support, which included nearly $300 million donated through America PAC. However, the poll also reveals strong Republican approval of Musk’s DOGE tenure, with 80% rating his work as excellent or good, compared to just 13% who viewed it negatively.

“Though Musk isn’t as popular with Republicans as he once was, he and DOGE get a hearty high five from a healthy majority of Republicans,” said Quinnipiac analyst Tim Malloy.

Musk’s ambitious goal to cut $2 trillion from the federal budget fell short, but his efforts at DOGE earned praise from Trump and GOP loyalists for challenging bureaucratic excess.

The poll, conducted June 5-9 with 1,265 registered voters and a ±2.8% margin of error, underscores that despite the feud, Musk retains significant goodwill among Trump’s base, thanks to the president’s leadership in aligning visionaries like Musk with his administration’s goals.

A Partnership Poised for Renewal

Musk’s early support for Trump was pivotal, from his July endorsement after the Butler, Pennsylvania assassination attempt to his role as the 2024 election cycle’s top donor. Trump rewarded Musk’s loyalty by appointing him to lead DOGE, where the billionaire pushed for sweeping government reforms.

The recent clash, sparked by Musk’s criticism of the spending bill, briefly tested their alliance, with Trump calling Musk “crazy” and Musk escalating with baseless Epstein claims.

Yet, Musk’s apology and Trump’s gracious response suggest both men are ready to mend fences, a testament to Trump’s ability to maintain strategic partnerships despite disagreements.

As the dust settles, the Quinnipiac poll indicates that Musk’s influence within the GOP remains robust, bolstered by Trump’s leadership and the party’s appreciation for DOGE’s mission.

With Trump focused on advancing his transformative agenda, the reconciliation with Musk could pave the way for renewed collaboration, ensuring that their shared vision for a leaner, stronger government continues to drive progress.

Los Angeles is on fire. But Trump isn’t taking any guff from the rioters.

Now a shocking video of an ICE arrest put Democrats on notice.

Swift Federal Action Targets LA Rioter

A dramatic video released by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Wednesday captured federal agents ramming a suspect’s car in Los Angeles to apprehend Christian Damian Cerno-Camacho, a “violent rioter” accused of punching a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer.

Shared on X amid escalating riots in the city, the footage underscores the Trump administration’s aggressive response to unrest sparked by its deportation crackdown.

“This was no hit-and-run. This was a targeted arrest of a violent rioter who punched a CBP officer,” Assistant DHS Secretary Tricia McLaughlin stated, emphasizing the deliberate nature of the operation.

Critics of local leadership argue the incident highlights the necessity of federal intervention in a city where Mayor Karen Bass has struggled to contain chaos.

The video shows two unmarked SUVs boxing in Cerno-Camacho’s white sedan on a city street, with agents in tactical gear swiftly exiting their vehicles, guns drawn. The suspect emerged with his arms raised, quickly cuffed, and taken into custody, demonstrating the precision and resolve of federal forces in addressing threats to public safety.

WATCH:

This was no hit and run. This was a targeted arrest of a violent rioter who punched a CBP officer. When Homeland Security Investigations tried to arrest Christian Damian Cerno-Camacho for the assault, he attempted to flee. He was ultimately arrested and taken into custody.

Our… pic.twitter.com/cm3r8kVRj0

— Homeland Security (@DHSgov) June 11, 2025

Context of Escalating Unrest in Los Angeles

The arrest follows a weekend of violent protests in Los Angeles, triggered by President Trump’s intensified immigration enforcement operations. The riots, which saw vandalism, attacks on police, and widespread disorder, prompted Trump to deploy 4,000 National Guardsmen and 700 U.S. Marines to restore order.

The DHS clarified that Cerno-Camacho’s arrest stemmed from his assault on a CBP officer, with McLaughlin noting, “When Homeland Security Investigations tried to arrest Christian Damian Cerno-Camacho for the assault, he attempted to flee.”

While it remains unclear when the arrest occurred or the specific charges filed, the operation reflects the administration’s zero-tolerance stance toward those inciting violence during the unrest.

The New York Post sought comment from DHS but received no immediate response, leaving some details of the incident pending. The targeted nature of the arrest, however, signals a broader federal effort to crack down on individuals exploiting the protests to commit violent acts, particularly against law enforcement.

Bass’s Leadership Under Fire

The federal response stands in stark contrast to Mayor Karen Bass’s handling of the riots, which critics argue has been inadequate and overly sympathetic to protesters.

Bass has publicly blamed Trump’s deportation policies for inciting the violence, deflecting attention from her administration’s failure to prevent the riots from escalating.

The arrest of Cerno-Camacho, a clear example of a violent offender targeted by federal agents, undermines Bass’s narrative that the protests are merely a reaction to federal overreach. Instead, it highlights the presence of agitators willing to assault officers, justifying the deployment of National Guard and Marine forces to restore calm.

As Los Angeles grapples with ongoing tensions, the DHS’s firm action against individuals like Cerno-Camacho reinforces the administration’s commitment to upholding law and order.

Critics contend that Bass’s reluctance to support federal efforts and her focus on critiquing immigration policy have left the city vulnerable, necessitating decisive federal intervention to protect residents and law enforcement alike.

Trump and Musk recently went at it. But now it’s all come to a head.

And Elon Musk made a sweeping announcement that directly affects Trump.

Musk’s Regret Over Social Media Tirade

Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, expressed remorse early Wednesday for the sharp attacks he launched at President Trump during their heated public feud last week. In a candid post on his platform X, Musk admitted, “I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.”

The Tesla CEO’s apology followed a week of escalating tensions that saw him take provocative swipes at the president, including inflammatory claims about Trump’s motives for withholding Jeffrey Epstein-related documents. The mea culpa marks a shift from the fiery rhetoric that had defined their clash, which played out prominently on social media.

Musk’s regret came shortly after Trump extended an olive branch, stating he wished Musk well—“very well, actually”—during a White House press conference.

Musk responded with a heart emoji, signaling a potential thaw in their strained relationship. While Musk did not specify which posts he regretted, his earlier remarks included a bombshell accusation: “Time to drop the really big bomb: Trump is in the Epstein files.

That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!” Such claims, alongside suggestions that Trump should be impeached and replaced by Vice President JD Vance, had intensified the feud.

Roots of the Rift and Public Fallout

The dispute erupted when Musk publicly criticized the administration’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” slamming it as an “outrageous, pork-filled” measure and a “disgusting abomination.” He urged Republicans to derail the legislation, prompting a fierce response from Trump, who called Musk “crazy” and suggested he had “lost his mind.”

Trump even floated the idea of cutting government contracts with Musk’s companies, escalating their once-close alliance into a public spectacle. The president later confirmed the deterioration of their bond, stating over the weekend that their “great relationship” was over.

Musk’s attacks went beyond policy, as he audaciously claimed credit for Trump’s political success while fanning conspiracies about the Epstein documents.

These provocations drew widespread attention, especially as the feud unfolded on X, where Musk’s posts fueled speculation about his motives.

Sources close to the billionaire now suggest his anger is subsiding, hinting at a desire to mend ties with Trump, though the path to reconciliation remains uncertain.

Signs of De-escalation Amid Lingering Tensions

The softening of Musk’s stance aligns with Trump’s recent conciliatory tone, as the president expressed openness to a call from Musk despite their falling out.

“We had a great relationship and I wish him well—very well, actually,” Trump reiterated, a sentiment Musk acknowledged with his heart emoji response.

This exchange, coupled with Musk’s apology, suggests both men may be stepping back from the brink of their public spat. However, the underlying issues—policy disagreements and personal jabs—remain unresolved, casting doubt on whether their once-tight “First Buddy” dynamic can be fully restored.

As the dust settles, Musk’s retraction and Trump’s measured response indicate a mutual interest in de-escalation. Yet, with Musk’s history of bold rhetoric and Trump’s sensitivity to criticism, the truce may be fragile.

For now, the public watches closely to see if these two influential figures can move past their clash or if lingering tensions will resurface.

China and America have been at loggerheads. But Trump has some big news to share.

And he revealed these secret talks with China in a bombshell announcement.

Breakthrough in US-China Trade Talks

President Trump announced a significant milestone in US-China trade relations, confirming early Wednesday that a “deal” was finalized after marathon negotiations in London. In a bold, all-caps post on Truth Social, Trump declared, “Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me.”

The agreement ensures China will supply “full magnets, and any necessary rare earths” upfront, addressing a critical US demand.

In return, the US will provide agreed-upon concessions, including access for Chinese students to American colleges and universities, a policy Trump noted he has always supported. “We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%. The relationship is excellent! Thank you for your attention to this matter!” he added.

The deal builds on the Geneva consensus from May, which reduced US tariffs on most Chinese goods from 145% to 30% and saw China lower its tariffs on US goods from 125% to 10%.

This truce set a deadline of August 10 for a more comprehensive trade agreement, a goal the London talks aimed to advance.

Overcoming Stalled Progress

The path to this agreement was not without hurdles. Implementation of the Geneva truce faltered when both nations accused each other of breaching its terms.

The US criticized China for “slow moves” in exporting rare earth minerals, prompting the Trump administration to tighten restrictions on key chemicals, impose stricter export controls on critical semiconductor design software, and revoke visas for Chinese students.

These measures underscored the tensions that threatened to derail the trade truce.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who announced late Tuesday that the US and China had “reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus,” described the London agreement as putting “meat on the bones” of the earlier truce.

He highlighted that China would ease barriers on rare earth minerals “in a balanced way,” though he provided no further details on the specifics of this commitment.

Lingering Challenges and Future Prospects

China’s Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang echoed the optimism, confirming that an agreement was reached in London, pending approval from Trump and President Xi.

The two sides engaged in nearly two days of intense deliberations to resolve the stalled progress of the Geneva consensus, wrapping up late Tuesday.

Trump, reflecting on a recent call with Xi, described the Chinese leader as “very tough, and extremely hard to make a deal with,” but noted their “very good” conversation helped move negotiations forward.

While the London deal signals progress in stabilizing US-China trade relations, it does not resolve the deeper structural differences between the two economic powers.

The agreement focuses on immediate trade issues, such as tariffs and rare earth exports, but leaves broader disputes unaddressed.

As both nations await final approval from their leaders, the deal represents a critical step toward maintaining the trade truce, though its long-term impact remains uncertain.

Americans remember the summer of 2020. No sane person wants to relive that.

But now Democrats are in big trouble after inciting riots nationwide.

Democrats Stoke the Flames: Excusing and Inciting Anti-ICE Violence

The Democratic Party and its media cheerleaders are facing a firestorm of criticism for their reckless response to the violent anti-ICE riots that tore through Los Angeles on June 6. Rather than condemn the chaos, figures like Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) have downplayed the destruction while egging on the agitators.

Murphy brushed off the riots as “pretty small,” yet had the gall to call for more street action, saying, “Obviously, this is a moment where we have to be on the streets all over the country to protest what’s happening to our immigrant community, but more broadly to protest what’s happening to our democracy.”

He doubled down, accusing President Trump of escalating tensions for political gain: “This is the most corrupt administration in the history of the country, and we are going to rise to this moment by being out there on the streets,” adding that Trump “is taking a protest that is relatively isolated… and he’s trying to turn a protest that is pretty small into something that involves an even bigger confrontation so that he might actually be able to invoke the Insurrection Act.”

Meanwhile, ABC7’s Marc Brown painted the rioters as “a bunch of people having fun watching cars burn,” warning that police action could “turn what is just a bunch of people having fun watching cars burn, into a massive confrontation and altercation.”

This soft-pedaling fits a pattern— the Daily Caller notes that outlets like the Associated Press, CBS News, and the Los Angeles Times have dodged calling a spade a spade, refusing to use “riot” or “rioters” despite widespread arson and assaults on police.

Democrats aren’t just ignoring the problem—they’re fanning the flames.

Reality Bites: Riots Expose Democratic Denial and Taxpayer-Funded Chaos

The Democratic narrative collapses under the weight of reality in Los Angeles. Far from “small” or “fun,” the riots have seen masked thugs smashing windows, setting cars ablaze, and pelting officers with concrete and deadly fireworks.

LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell didn’t mince words: “The violence that I’ve seen is disgusting. It’s escalated now since the beginning of this incident…Tonight, we had individuals shooting commercial-grade fireworks at our officers. That can kill you.”

At the heart of this anarchy is the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA), a radical group bankrolled by tens of millions in taxpayer dollars through California state grants, as uncovered by the New York Post. While Democrats like Murphy cheer “protests,” their policies have funneled public funds to agitators who threaten public safety.

The contrast couldn’t be clearer: Democratic denial has let lawlessness spiral out of control, while President Trump stepped in on June 8, ordering the National Guard and DHS “to liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion, and put an end to these Migrant riots.” Trump’s resolve stands tall against the Democrats’ cowardice.

Newsom’s Folly: Attacking Trump While California Burns

As Los Angeles reels, Governor Gavin Newsom has picked a bizarre hill to die on: suing President Trump for saving his state. On June 9, Newsom accused Trump of “illegally” federalizing the National Guard and trying “to manufacture chaos and violence”—a laughable claim from a leader who’s let California’s streets become a war zone.

Trump hit back hard on X: “If we had not done so, Los Angeles would have been completely obliterated,” blasting Newsom for choosing “to lie to the People of California and America by saying that we weren’t needed, and that these are ‘peaceful protests.’”

He vowed, “We will always do what is needed to keep our Citizens SAFE, so we can, together, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!” While Newsom wastes time on political stunts, Trump delivers results. The riots lay bare a simple truth: Democrats coddle chaos, while Trump fights for order.