The failed vice presidential candidate is telling all. And it’s not looking good.

Because he confessed to something truly shocking on MSNBC.

A Defeated Walz Points Fingers After 2024 Loss

Tim Walz, the Minnesota governor who fell short as Kamala Harris’s running mate in the 2024 election, has been vocal about his self-assigned blame for the Democratic Party’s current struggles. With President Trump back in the White House and rolling out his agenda, Walz is scrambling to make sense of the political landscape—and his own role in its unraveling.

At 60, Walz didn’t hold back during a recent MSNBC appearance on “All In with Chris Hayes.” “I think Americans have had it, I hope they’ve had it and now we just need to do what we can do to make the case. Look, I own this, we wouldn’t be in this mess if we would’ve won the election and we didn’t,” he vented.

His claim that America “wouldn’t be in this mess” if he and Harris had triumphed in November paints a picture of a man haunted by what-ifs, though it conveniently sidesteps the electorate’s clear rejection of their ticket.

Vague Critiques and Empty Alternatives

Walz insisted the Democrats need to pivot, saying, “We have to make sure that Americans know it’s just not that Donald Trump is bad, but that we’re offering something better.” Yet, when pressed for specifics on what that “better” might entail, he came up empty-handed.

Instead, he took aim at Trump’s moves—like slapping tariffs on Canadian goods, tightening the U.S. border, and dismantling the Department of Education—dismissing them as “incredibly disruptive” to Minnesotans. He argued that cross-border communities are reeling from the tariffs, but his indignation feels more like sour grapes than a coherent counterplan.

His disdain for Trump took a theatrical turn as he sneered, “Donald Trump is this caricature that had a reality TV show that pretended like he knew how to run businesses. The reality is he doesn’t.”

Doubling down, he added, “The claim that he is the business president. He is the worst possible business executive that I have ever witnessed.” Walz’s personal jabs might rally the MSNBC crowd, but they do little to mask his failure to articulate a compelling Democratic vision.

A Reluctant Nod to Trump’s Appeal

Despite his bluster, Walz couldn’t fully dismiss the appeal of Trump’s approach. “Look, I’m conservative and I believe that systems work for a long time, that you don’t have to break them. Are there improvements that need to be done? Yes, and I think we’re guilty of sometimes of not acting. Could the Department of Education be more efficient? Absolutely,” he conceded.

He even admitted that Trump’s idea of funneling education funds directly to local schools “sounds pretty good.” It’s a rare moment of candor from Walz, though it undercuts his broader narrative of Trump as a reckless destroyer.

Still, he struggled to reconcile this with his broader critique. Welcoming “disruptors” who shake up government stagnation, he grumbled, “What is the goal and where is it backed up? There’s not a single economist that backs tariffs. There’s no one there.”

His frustration hints at a deeper problem: Walz sees the allure of shaking things up but can’t—or won’t—offer a clear alternative. “We have not provided what that alternative looks like and I think it’s fair,” he admitted, a confession that rings more like an indictment of his own leadership.

Walz’s Next Move: Iowa and Medicaid Missteps

Looking ahead, Walz plans to head to Iowa on Friday for a town hall, where he’ll field questions about why Republicans allegedly want to “cut Medicaid”—a claim the Trump White House has repeatedly shot down.

“The Trump Administration will not cut Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid benefits. President Trump himself has said it (over and over and over again),” the White House clarified Tuesday, pointing instead to a focus on rooting out “waste and fraud.” Walz’s decision to lean into this narrative suggests he’s more comfortable peddling debunked talking points than grappling with the reality of Trump’s agenda—or his own shortcomings.

Walz’s post-election reckoning reveals a politician eager to cast blame, quick with a quip, but slow to deliver substance. As he rails against Trump’s policies, his slight concessions to their logic only highlight the Democrats’ failure to adapt—leaving voters to wonder if Walz’s rhetoric is more about soothing his own bruised ego than charting a path forward.

The Left will do anything to stop Trump’s agenda. They’ll even break the law.

And now Trump’s Border Czar threatened one Democrat Governor over this shocking crime.

Border Czar Warns New York: Cooperate or Face an ICE Surge

Border czar Tom Homan delivered a clear message to New York Governor Kathy Hochul on Wednesday—either cooperate with federal immigration crackdowns or prepare for a flood of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents across the state.

Speaking alongside Albany Republicans at the state Capitol, Homan didn’t mince words when addressing Hochul and other Democrats defending sanctuary city policies.

“Sanctuary cities are going to get exactly what they don’t want: more ICE agents in your community,” Homan warned.

“We’ll double the man-force if we have to. Rather than one officer arresting a bad guy, now I have to send a whole team.”

Homan’s tough stance signals the Trump administration’s ongoing commitment to enforcing immigration laws—whether blue-state leaders like it or not.

Praise for Mayor Adams Amid Crackdown Cooperation

While Homan issued sharp warnings to Governor Hochul, he struck a much different tone toward New York City Mayor Eric Adams. Despite Adams’ usual alignment with Democrat policies, Homan applauded the mayor’s willingness to work with the Trump administration on immigration enforcement.

“He’s made great commitments, we’re working on some things, I can’t share it all with you right now,” Homan said, revealing he will meet with Adams again this week—their third meeting in recent months.

The border czar also dismissed media speculation that Adams’ cooperation was tied to the Trump administration easing off a corruption investigation into the mayor’s office.

“I’ve been talking with him since November, I had nothing to do with that,” Homan stated plainly.

This unexpected alliance between Homan and Adams suggests that at least one New York Democrat understands the need for serious border enforcement.

Republicans Push Back Against Sanctuary Policies

Homan’s comments came during a rally led by Republican lawmakers pushing to repeal New York’s controversial Green Light Law—a measure that allows illegal immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses.

GOP leaders are also pushing for passage of the state’s Laken Riley Act, which aims to dismantle sanctuary city policies.

When asked whether he would meet with Governor Hochul during his time in Albany, Homan’s response was simple: “She knows my number.”

With the Trump administration turning up the heat on lawless sanctuary cities, it’s clear that cooperation is no longer optional. And if Hochul continues to resist, New York may soon find itself under the watchful eye of even more federal immigration agents.

The mainstream media usually pushes the Left’s agenda. But sometimes the truth breaks through.

And now CNN is in hot water after exposing the Democrat Party’s Achilles’ heel.

Here’s the revised version with three sections and appropriate headers:

Van Jones Admits: “We’re Screwed”

CNN commentator Van Jones didn’t hold back on Sunday, delivering a blunt assessment of the Democratic Party’s ongoing dysfunction. According to Jones, unless Democrats can find a way to regroup and rethink their messaging, they’ll remain stuck in neutral—struggling to connect with voters and failing to achieve any meaningful policy goals.

Appearing on CNN Newsroom Sunday with anchor Jessica Dean, Jones was asked to weigh in on the state of the Democratic Party—especially after the embarrassing outbursts during and after President Donald Trump’s powerful address to a joint session of Congress.

At first, Jones tried to avoid the topic altogether. “Can we ask another question?” he deflected. “Can we talk about Ukraine or something?”

But when pressed, Jones didn’t sugarcoat the reality Democrats are facing.

“Look, man, we’re screwed,” Jones admitted. “I mean, we don’t know—Democrats don’t know what to do. This is—this is a nightmare. You know, somebody like Donald Trump, we thought we’d at least have Hakeem Jeffries in the Speaker’s chair to hold him back if we didn’t have Kamala in there to do the right thing.”

It’s a stunning admission from a party insider. After years of attacking Trump and doubling down on identity politics, Democrats are left floundering without a clear strategy—or a leader strong enough to challenge the President’s America-first agenda.

A Failing Message and Alienated Voters

Jones pointed to the party’s failed messaging as a key reason for their continued downward spiral, suggesting they are still paying the price for their disastrous 2024 campaign.

“Listen, the Democratic Party is going through a massive set of internal crises. You have a party that got trapped two ways. One, defending a broken status quo that nobody likes because they thought that Donald Trump was going to make it worse. But when you’re defending the status quo, you’re going to lose,” he explained.

And Democrats aren’t just clinging to failed policies—they’re actively alienating everyday Americans with their condescending rhetoric.

“And then offending most people in the country, calling everybody sexist and racist and transphobic and every other name, and then saying, ‘Please follow us.’ That’s not a good strategy, folks,” Jones added.

In other words, the Democrats’ playbook of smearing half the country while pushing an out-of-touch agenda isn’t working—and even their own operatives are starting to admit it.

“Defending a broken status quo and offending most of the country turns out to not be as popular as my party thought it was going to be,” Jones concluded. “And so it’s going to take a while for people to get it figured out.”

Democrats “On Their Heels” as Trump Advances

Jones isn’t the only Democrat waving the white flag. Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) echoed his grim outlook during an appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press, telling host Kristen Welker that Democrats have been “on their heels” since the election.

It’s a revealing confession from within the party’s own ranks. Despite their nonstop attacks on President Trump, the Democratic Party remains directionless, unable to mount a coherent opposition.

Meanwhile, President Trump continues to press forward with a bold, results-driven agenda—leaving Democrats scrambling to recover from their self-inflicted wounds. As long as their party remains in chaos, it’s clear Trump’s momentum isn’t slowing down anytime soon.

The term Trump Derangement Syndrome started as a joke. But the reality is even scarier than anyone thought.

Now Democrats are literally going crazy over Donald Trump: psychologist.

The Trump administration’s bold reforms are shaking up Washington, and not everyone is happy about it. Some groups—especially those tied to bloated federal programs—are worried that their jobs could be next on the chopping block as the administration takes aim at wasteful spending. According to one Georgetown University psychology professor, these changes are even driving some people to therapy.

“I’m getting an increased amount of inquiries from people who are just feeling very anxious in general, and it’s exacerbated by the state of the country,” Dr. Andrea Bonior told Fox News Digital.

Bonior says her clients—many of whom are federal workers, humanitarians, and academics—are feeling the heat as billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk leads the charge to clean up Washington’s excess. Musk’s aggressive cost-cutting efforts, part of the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), are focusing on trimming federal jobs, grants, and wasteful programs. Unsurprisingly, many of her worried patients hail from the D.C. area, where she balances her Georgetown teaching duties with a part-time private practice.

According to Bonior, the fear is most pronounced among those with ties to the federal government or federally funded projects.

“I’ve had some clients who were technically probationary workers because they had gotten promotions, so they had been longtime civil servants, public servants, but they were treated like someone who was just coming out of college and getting their first job because they were probationary,” she shared.

“They were probationary because they were in a new position, having been promoted for having done such a great job.”

DOGE, established during the beginning of President Trump’s second term, was created to root out waste, fraud, and abuse while streamlining government operations. With a planned dissolution date of July 4, 2026, its mission is clear: cut the fat and return power to the people.

Trump has praised Musk’s leadership and unwavering commitment to the cause. In a “Sunday Morning Futures” exclusive interview over the weekend, Trump called Musk a “real patriot” for “opening a lot of eyes” to the outrageous spending habits that DOGE is exposing. The President has made it clear to his cabinet that cooperation with DOGE is non-negotiable, urging agency heads to use a “scalpel” when deciding which jobs to keep.

Yet, as Washington insiders scramble to protect their interests, Bonior claims the effects of DOGE’s reforms are rippling through sectors with humanitarian and nonprofit ties.

Researchers and scientists in higher education are also feeling the pinch, Bonior says, especially those reliant on federal grants. Veterans working for the government—a significant group—are likewise facing uncertainty due to the budget cuts.

But it’s not just Washington elites who are worried. Bonior says her telehealth practice, which spans multiple states, is flooded with messages from people expressing concerns about financial security and broader economic uncertainty.

“I think there’s a larger concern that goes beyond policy, and I’m actually, in the past couple of days, hearing from a lot of people who are just concerned about financial insecurity and concerned about the just destabilization of even the stock markets and even people who consider themselves to be not having anything to do with this,” she said, adding, “I think there’s just a larger concern that the whole tone of this administration feels different.”

However, as Trump’s agenda disrupts the status quo, it’s clear many of those complaining are the very same people who benefited from years of unchecked government largesse. Bonior even admitted to Axios that more and more disillusioned Democrats are seeking help as they wrestle with “burnout, guilt, and despair” over the loss of their old way of life.

Interestingly, Bonior acknowledged that dissatisfaction isn’t limited to one political party. Some Republicans working in federal positions worry about cuts to research funding, while others—such as conservative Christians—are uneasy about reductions in humanitarian aid.

“Contrary to maybe popular belief, there are plenty of Republicans that work in the federal government that are being directly affected. There are plenty of Republicans who care immensely about scientific research and solving medical problems that face this country, and cancer research and Alzheimer’s research and research on childhood disorders… there are lots of conservative Christians who really are concerned with the humanitarian aid cuts and… I think that’s where it really goes to an issue that’s no longer a political issue. I think there are a lot of people who feel that this is a moral issue,” she said.

Still, some of those now feeling the squeeze were once Trump supporters themselves.

“I’ve heard from several folks that have said… ‘I admit this [DOGE] sounded good in theory. Maybe I even voted for Trump, but now I’m feeling completely abandoned because my job is on the chopping block,’” Bonior added.

When Fox News Digital reached out to the White House, Principal Deputy Press Secretary Harrison Fields didn’t mince words, defending the President’s commitment to fixing a broken system.

“President Trump returned to Washington with a mandate from the American people to bring about unprecedented change in our federal government to uproot waste, fraud, and abuse. This isn’t easy to do in a broken system entrenched in bureaucracy and bloat, but it’s a task long overdue. The personal financial situation of every American is top of mind for the President, which is why he’s working to cut regulations, reshore jobs, lower taxes, and make government more efficient,” Fields said.

Despite the noise from Washington’s entrenched bureaucracy, one thing is clear: Trump isn’t backing down. With Musk leading the charge at DOGE, the administration is delivering on its promise to dismantle the swamp—one wasteful program at a time.

The United States used to lead the world. But thanks to past administrations, we’ve fallen behind.

Now the Pentagon just confessed America’s greatest weakness.

Experts Slam Pentagon’s “Outdated” Approach to Military Innovation, Urge Urgent Overhaul

America’s military is falling behind its adversaries, and the blame lies squarely with the Pentagon’s slow, bureaucratic approach to modernization, national security experts warned at a recent security summit.

The Pentagon’s failure to keep pace with technological advances earned it a dismal “D” grade from the National Security Innovation Base Summit—an assessment that even national security leaders in Congress agreed was accurate.

“Progress lives in the private sector, and we’re not seeing enough progress in the public sector,” said Govini CEO Tara Murphy Dougherty. “The department needs a massive kick in the pants in this area and should be held accountable for catching up in progress to match what is happening among the investor community and among the technology sector.”

House Armed Services Committee Vice Chair Rob Wittman didn’t mince words when reacting to the Pentagon’s poor performance.

“I think the score is a deserved score, unfortunately,” Wittman admitted.

He compared the Pentagon’s outdated processes to a bygone era of manufacturing.

“The Pentagon is the Ford Motor Company of the 1950s. I mean, the way they operate—slow, stoic,” Wittman explained. “‘Let’s spend years to write a requirement, then let’s spend years to go to a program or record, let’s spend years to acquire.’ By the time we acquire something, guess what? The threat’s way ahead of us.”

His solution? “We want them to reflect the Apple 2025 model.”

Shipbuilding Woes Underscore a Larger Problem

The consequences of this slow-moving bureaucracy are most evident in America’s shrinking naval power. While the Navy currently operates with 295 deployable ships, plans to expand the fleet to 390 aren’t projected to materialize until 2054. Meanwhile, the Maritime Security Program, which maintains privately-owned, military-useful ships for wartime deployment, is down to a mere 60 vessels.

“It’s precipitously low. We could not get to where we need to be in the Pacific right now if we needed to,” Wittman warned, underscoring concerns about America’s ability to project power in key regions.

Even President Donald Trump has taken a personal interest in the issue.

John Phelan, Trump’s nominee for Navy secretary, revealed that the president frequently checks in—sometimes at odd hours—to press for action.

“Sometimes after 1 a.m.,” Phelan said during his confirmation hearing, “[Trump is] asking me, what am I doing about it?”

Phelan said he reassured the president, “I’m not confirmed yet and have not been able to do anything about it, but I will be very focused on it.”

Trump has made it clear he intends to revitalize America’s shipbuilding capabilities.

“We used to make so many ships,” Trump remarked during a speech to Congress on Tuesday. “We don’t make them anymore very much, but we’re going to make them very fast, very soon. It will have a huge impact.”

He also announced the creation of a White House Office of Shipbuilding to accelerate progress.

Stuck in the Past While Adversaries Surge Ahead

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle agree that the Pentagon’s sluggishness is jeopardizing national security.

“We’re operating off of an innovation cycle right now that, you know, used to be a decade, and it used to be five years. Then it used to be three years, and now it’s a year or less innovation cycle,” said Rep. Jason Crow, D-Colo. “In Ukraine, they’re actually operating off of week-long innovation cycles.”

Crow said the responsibility falls on Congress to light a fire under the Pentagon.

“There are simply no demand signals being sent. So that requires a very real conversation about political will, which is actually bipartisan right now on this issue,” he added.

The Pentagon’s handling of the F-35 fighter jet is a glaring example of the problem. After 25 years in development, the aircraft is “just now getting into full-scale production,” according to Wittman.

“The capability of that aircraft, the modernization that it needs to keep up with the Chinese threat, it’s just not where it has to be,” he said.

Worse still, even the latest F-35s rolling off the assembly line need to be sent back for critical upgrades, including advanced motion sensors and radar systems.

“We’re still not going to deliver the current jets coming off the line with technical refresh three hardware and have that software enabled until probably early next year,” Wittman added.

Cybersecurity: America’s Achilles’ Heel?

Beyond physical hardware, lawmakers are deeply worried about America’s vulnerabilities in cyberspace—especially when it comes to facing off against China.

“China specifically is better at cybersecurity than we are,” warned Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa. “It only takes one or two incursions that we don’t see coming or that we aren’t responsive to, to make an enormous difference here.”

Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., argued that the U.S. should start thinking about more aggressive cyber tactics to push back against foreign threats.

“When it comes to cyber, we’ve got to change the rules of engagement,” Bacon insisted.

He laid out just how pervasive China’s cyber intrusions have become.

“China is eating our boxed lunch in the energy area, in our cellular phone infrastructure, they’re trying to get into Wall Street, they’re trying to get into agriculture,” he said.

According to Bacon, America needs to stop taking punches and start punching back.

“We’re really good on cyberintelligence, but we have [rules of engagement] that do not let us do nearly what China or Russia does,” he argued. “I don’t think it’s like taking punches to the face, saying ‘can I have another.’”

His message to the Pentagon and policymakers? It’s time to fight fire with fire.

“We’ve got to be able to allow cyber command to fight fire with fire. I wouldn’t even advertise it that much. Just carry a big stick and, get them back,” Bacon said.

A Long Road Ahead

In response to mounting criticism, the Pentagon has launched a review of its contracting procedures under a new DOGE memo.

“Each Agency Head, in consultation with the agency’s DOGE Team Lead, shall conduct a comprehensive review of each agency’s contracting policies, procedures, and personnel,” the memo circulated this week stated.

But with adversaries like China rapidly advancing and the Pentagon still moving at a glacial pace, lawmakers are making one thing clear: Time is running out.

The View is as anti-American as it gets. Now they are outright saying it.

Because Whoopi Goldberg committed treason live on air with this disgusting act.

Whoopi Goldberg Claims Americans “Don’t Know Stuff,” Defends Need for More Immigrants

The View co-host Whoopi Goldberg sparked outrage during a panel discussion on Wednesday, defending mass immigration by claiming that Americans simply aren’t capable of getting things done without help from foreign workers.

“My point is, we’ve spent over 100 years saying to people, come, you’re welcome. We’ll take you. Now, nobody knows how you get in, what do you do because it’s a mess,” Goldberg said in a rant criticizing the immigration system under the Trump administration. “So I want somebody to make up your mind so people know what to do.”

Goldberg then took it a step further, arguing that Americans lack the skills to function without immigrants.

“I listen to folks say, ‘Oh, well, you know, we don’t want people from other countries coming and teaching people how to do stuff,’” she continued. “Why aren’t Americans doing it? Because Americans don’t know stuff. We need folks coming in to help us figure out how to do stuff.”

Her comments came as the panel tore into President Donald Trump’s proposed “gold card” visa, which would allow wealthy foreigners to buy their way into the United States for $5 million.

Co-host Sara Haines criticized Trump’s gold card proposal, suggesting it would alienate the legal immigrants who supported his administration.

“If you have enough money, you can come. I don’t think that will bode well [with those] that voted for him that you can just skip the line if you’re wealthy. That is a problem,” Haines said.

She also pointed out the hypocrisy of Trump’s tough stance on border security while offering an easy path for the rich.

“I also think he talks so much about criminals coming across the borders and all the problems they bring with them. People with money can be criminals, too,” she added.

Haines even went so far as to suggest that the gold card could become a backdoor for wealthy terrorists to enter the country.

“In fact, they have more resources to be criminals,” she warned.

Bringing up the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Haines noted that many of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia—a nation known for its wealth. She suggested Trump’s foreign policy, including his recent comments about taking over Gaza, could make America a bigger target for extremist groups.

“Right now you have Trump talking loosely about taking over Gaza; that puts a terrorist target on our back, and extremist groups, jihadists, will not stop until they’re not just done with land grabs. They’re done with Western civilization. So, they will definitely come here if this kind of thing can be bought. It is way easier than the way that they were planning in the past,” Haines claimed.

Joy Behar, never one to miss a chance to mock Trump, chimed in with a sarcastic jab.

“All I can say is thank God someone’s looking out for millionaires!” Behar quipped.

The failed-vice presidential candidate didn’t do much right during the campaign. Now that’s bleeding into the post-election.

Because he went on CNN and made an absolute fool of himself and Democrats.

Tim Walz, the governor of Minnesota and former vice presidential candidate, couldn’t name someone when asked who the leader of the Democratic party is.

Walz appeared on CNN’s The Arena with Kasie Hunt Wednesday to discuss President Donald Trump’s joint congressional address.

Hunt asked the governor who he thinks is the Democratic leader right now.

The 60-year-old Democrat paused for a few beats before answering.

“I think the voting public, right now, is what I would say,” Walz responded. “We’re not going to have a charismatic leader ride in and save us from this.”

Hunt followed up by asking if Walz sees anyone who could “be a national Democratic figure?”

“I see a whole lot of them,” Walz said. “I see young members of Congress stepping up, I see folks out there, I see it out here, state senators, state legislators, folks that are getting ready. Labor union members who are out there talking. I think the thing we need to do is: We can’t cede the space. If Donald Trump’s going to be out there…we have to be there every day.”

“We need to be better organized. There is going to be an organic uprising which we’re seeing.”

When Hunt asked if former Vice President Kamala Harris could be that future leader, Walz responded: “I certainly think she could be.”

Walz isn’t the first to contend with this question. Since Harris’s loss last Election Day, Democratic lawmakers have expressed discontent with their party’s leadership — or lack thereof.

“There’s no one, certainly, that the party, I would argue, looks to, or feels led by, or inspired by, is the truth,” former Democratic Representative Dean Phillips told The Hill last month.

“Any organization — business, for-profit, nonprofit, political party — that lacks spirited leadership is going to suffer. And I think you can count us among those organizations right now. There’s just no question.”

A new poll from the liberal firm Blueprint first obtained by Politico also indicates 40 percent of voters believe that Democrats do not have any strategy for combatting the Trump administration.

That division was made clear when Democrats had a variety of responses to Trump’s joint congressional address on Tuesday. Many silently listened, others walked out and some wore pink in protest. Representative Al Green, a Democrat from Texas, was even removed from the chamber for repeatedly interrupting Trump at the beginning of the address.

“Last night I stood up for those who need Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security. Democrats will never abandon the fight to make sure every American has a safe, healthy, and financially secure life. #ISaidWhatISaid,” Green wrote on X on Wednesday night.

Green’s fellow lawmakers voted to censure him on Thursday. Nearly every Republican and 10 Democrats voted in favor of the resolution.

The ladies of The View have officially lost their minds. This is beyond the pale for anyone.

And now The View’s Joy Behar went completely insane in this deranged rant caught on camera.

Joy Behar has a message for anyone who supported President Donald Trump—don’t count on her for help. During Thursday’s episode of The View on ABC, Behar made it clear that while she wouldn’t cut off a friendship over political differences, she wouldn’t lift a finger to assist a Trump supporter in need. And if they were hoping for a life-saving favor? Forget it.

“I won’t give them a kidney, but I could be friends with them,” Behar declared. Her tone left no room for doubt—Trump voters, in her eyes, have crossed a moral line that makes them unworthy of certain basic acts of kindness.

Behar doubled down, arguing that supporting Trump isn’t just a political choice—it’s a character flaw.

“It’s not just about politics, it’s about morality, ethics, it’s about cruelty, it’s about discrimination. It’s about a lot of things. So, those are personal human values,” she explained. In other words, if you back Trump, Behar sees it as a sign of poor moral judgment.

And according to Behar, it’s not just about tax policy or economic debates—it’s personal. “We’re not really just talking about a fiscal conservative who pays more taxes,” she added.

“We’re talking about you as a human being. So it’s hard to be friends with someone who signs on to something like that.”

Joy Behar claims she's friends with a Trump supporter but adds she wouldn't give them a kidney to save their life:
"I won't give them a kidney but I could be friends with them…the thing about it, it's not just about politics, it's about morality, ethics, it's about cruelty,… pic.twitter.com/TqMu3wzFXC

— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) March 6, 2025

Not surprisingly, her cohost Sunny Hostin enthusiastically agreed. Hostin claimed that Trump has transformed the Republican Party into something irredeemable.

“I agree with that because I think, you know, we’re in abnormal times. This is not the Republican Party of yesterday. I think it’s the Trumplican party in many respects,” she said, pushing the narrative that Trump and his supporters are “so extreme.”

Hostin went even further, blaming Trump voters for a long list of societal harms. “If someone is supporting or voting for someone who is hurting members of my family, members of my community, our elderly, our children, gutting our government, firing people; I do have a hard time being friends with that person,” she said, suggesting that anyone who votes for Trump is personally complicit in causing harm to society.

Cohost Sara Haines took a slightly softer approach but still implied that Trump supporters are out of step with modern values. Reflecting on her own background, she noted how much has changed in recent years.

“It’s very common to know people that vote differently,” Haines said, describing her shift from “Midwest conservative life to super liberal East Coast life.” The implication? What was once a routine difference of opinion is now a moral divide.

Throughout the discussion, the panel’s underlying message was crystal clear—if you support Trump, you’re either misguided or simply getting your information from the “wrong sources.” There was no consideration that millions of Americans might have valid, thoughtful reasons for backing Trump’s America First agenda. Instead, the cohosts dismissed those voters as uninformed at best and immoral at worst.

This kind of dismissive rhetoric is nothing new for The View. For years, the panel has openly displayed its contempt for Trump and his supporters. But Behar’s latest comments take that hostility to a new level—suggesting that supporting Trump not only makes someone politically incorrect but also undeserving of basic human decency.

The irony is hard to ignore. The same left-wing voices who constantly lecture Americans about tolerance and compassion seem to abandon those principles the moment someone dares to support a leader they despise. Behar’s refusal to help a Trump supporter in need lays bare the hypocrisy behind the left’s so-called message of kindness and inclusion.

For the millions of Americans who proudly supported Trump—not once, but twice—Behar’s words are yet another reminder of how detached Hollywood elites have become from the real world.

These are the same hardworking Americans who value faith, family, and freedom—values that are clearly lost on the out-of-touch television personalities preaching from their bubble.

And despite the panel’s smug certainty, Trump’s enduring popularity tells a different story.

The 2024 election made one thing clear: millions of Americans still stand behind a leader who puts their interests first. Whether Joy Behar approves or not, Trump’s movement is stronger than ever—and it’s not going away anytime soon.

The United States bank rolls the international community. That isn’t going to continue.

And now the UN is shutting down after Trump leveled a stunning threat against them.

The United Nations is scrambling to prepare for potential U.S. funding cuts as President Trump’s administration sharpens its focus on eliminating government waste. An internal U.N. memo obtained by Fox News Digital reveals growing concern within the organization as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) intensifies its efforts to rein in reckless spending.

The memo, titled “Managing the 2025 regular budget liquidity crisis,” was sent to heads of various U.N. departments and offices. It outlines a directive from Secretary-General António Guterres to tighten the organization’s cash flow, freeze hiring, and operate with only 80% of their allocated budgets.

“We are aware that the 80% ceiling could pose significant challenges for many entities to meet some of their non-discretionary spending for non-post costs. However, we are constrained by the lack of overall liquidity,” the memo states.

U.N. spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric confirmed the memo’s authenticity but downplayed its significance, insisting to Fox News Digital that such measures were “not unusual.”

Despite the memo’s warning of potential financial strain, insiders speaking to former Principal Deputy Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs Hugh Dugan are skeptical.

According to Dugan, those within the U.N. are not taking the memo seriously and do not believe it reflects “real cuts.”

Even the supposed hiring freeze is viewed with suspicion, as insiders doubt it will result in any genuine slowdown in recruitment.

Adding to the internal unease, Secretary-General Guterres also invited all U.N. personnel to a virtual town hall later this month. While the invitation did not specify a topic, Dujarric admitted the secretary-general will address the organization’s growing financial troubles.

Dugan wasn’t impressed by the vague invitation or the delayed timing of the town hall. “The urgency is not present enough at all,” he told Fox News Digital, suggesting the U.N. is still clinging to the false hope that it can escape meaningful budgetary discipline.

For years, the U.N. has relied on the assumption that it can strong-arm the United States and other major contributors into maintaining its lavish funding. But Dugan argued those days are over, calling the organization’s belief that it can leverage its international influence “preposterous.”

And there’s good reason for the U.N. to worry. President Trump has made no secret of his disdain for the waste and inefficiency plaguing international bureaucracies.

In a recent address to Congress, Trump listed multiple examples of “appalling waste” uncovered by DOGE and signaled his administration’s determination to cut off funding to organizations that refuse to clean up their act.

The U.N.’s concerns may extend beyond the United States. If other major donor countries begin to follow Trump’s lead and reassess their contributions, the organization’s financial woes could deepen considerably.

Still, Dujarric insists the memo is not a “direct result of the political situation in the U.S.,” claiming the U.N. has faced “a liquidity crisis” for decades due to some member states failing to pay their dues on time—or at all.

The memo comes just weeks after Secretary-General Guterres sent a letter to staff attempting to downplay the seriousness of the situation while offering empty platitudes about the organization’s global mission.

“Now, more than ever, the work of the United Nations is crucial. As we face this difficult challenge, your dedication and support will help us to overcome and move forward,” Guterres wrote in his February letter—a message that rings increasingly hollow as the reality of Trump’s America First agenda begins to bite.

With President Trump’s administration cracking down on wasteful spending and the U.N. no longer able to rely on business as usual, the days of unchecked budgets and bloated bureaucracy may finally be coming to an end.

Vice President Vance is taking a page out of Trump’s book. The time for playing nice is over.

And now he didn’t pull any punches in this brutal takedown at the border.

Vice President J.D. Vance stood firm Wednesday, backing the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement tempo, arguing they’re piecing together a Homeland Security system that President Biden left in shambles.

Down at the Texas border, Vance cheered the massive plunge in illegal crossings but admitted there’s still work to do when it comes to rounding up and kicking out undocumented immigrants already stateside.

“Rome wasn’t built in a day,” he quipped. “President Biden gutted the entire immigration enforcement regime of this country. We are trying to rebuild.”

Arrests are spiking, but deportations? Down. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement clocked roughly 645 deportations daily by late February—a 17% dip from the same stretch in 2024. Why? Fewer border cases to boot out and trickier interior enforcement.

Vance shot a plea to Congress: cough up more cash for deportation flights and the squads fanning out into neighborhoods to hunt for targets.

He also tossed a nudge to illegal immigrants—pack up and leave on your own.

On Trump’s vision, Vance said the boss aims to “build the entire border wall” by the end of his second term, though he kept mum on how many miles that covers.

A reporter floated rumors of U.S. troops rolling into Mexico. Vance shut it down hard.

“No,” he said.

Tagging along were Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

Gabbard aired worries about migrants who slipped in under Biden’s watch. She cited reports of a thousand funneled through a smuggling ring linked to the Islamic State.

Turns out, “hundreds” might have terrorist ties, authorities later figured out. Biden’s crew nabbed “a little over 100” last year but cut loose all but eight, Gabbard noted.

She’s after answers on the rest.

“Where are they, what are they doing, what may they be plotting?” she pressed.

The border stretch they scoped out? Night-and-day difference.

Vance said agents once logged 1,500 illegal crossings daily. Now? Down to 30.

Hegseth boasted a border-wide plunge of 98%.

“We’re not yet at 100% operational control but we are on our way,” the Pentagon boss declared.

Donald Trump is usually accomplishing stuff on his own. But now he needs help.

And he announced the one thing he wants Americans to do for him.

President Trump didn’t shy away from the big topic looming over his Tuesday night speech to a joint session of Congress: tariffs.

He dove right in, owning the economic ripples they’d cause and asking Americans to “bear with” him through what he called an “adjustment period.”

He laid out a bold plan, announcing a major agricultural tariff set to kick in April 2. “The tariffs will go on agricultural products coming into America and our farmers, starting on April 2,” Trump said.

“It may be a little bit of an adjustment period. We had that before, when I made the deal with China, $50 billion of purchases, and I said, ‘just bear with me.’ And they did. They did.”

He doubled down, repeating, “You probably have to bear with me again, and this will be even better.” The déjà vu nod to his China deal was a flex—proof he’s navigated choppy waters before and come out on top.

Overnight, the Trump administration unleashed a tariff blitz: a hefty 25% across-the-board hit on Mexico and Canada (with Canadian energy catching a lighter 10% rate), plus a doubled 20% tariff on China.

The move targeted all three for not stepping up enough on the fentanyl crisis—a sore spot Trump’s hammered since last November, when he first floated these punishing levies.

Originally slated for last month, Trump held off, citing headway in talks with the trio. But now, the gloves are off, impacting $1.5 trillion in yearly imports.

Predictably, all three nations fired back with retaliatory tariffs of their own.

Trump didn’t blink. “Whatever they tariff us, we tariff them. Whatever they tax us, we tax them,” he told Congress.

“If they do non-monetary tariffs to keep us out of their market, then we do non-monetary barriers to keep them out of our market. We will take in trillions of dollars and create jobs like we have never seen before.”

It was a chest-thumping vow—tit-for-tat economics with a promise of jobs raining down.

Even amid the tariff talk, Trump pivoted to a crowd-pleaser, pledging “dramatic and immediate relief to working families” despite the short-term growing pains.

Democrats weren’t buying it—jeers erupted when he touted his economic vision, their skepticism loud and clear.

Earlier Tuesday, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick hinted at a possible thaw, telling reporters the president “probably” has deals brewing with Canada and Mexico, maybe as soon as Wednesday. A glimmer of diplomacy amid the tariff storm? Time will tell.

Trump’s address was a high-wire act—blunt on trade, optimistic on outcomes, and unapologetic in tone. The tariff gamble’s on, and he’s betting Americans will ride it out for a bigger win.

The Left is getting in their own way. That tends to be their MO.

Now Democrats are getting ruthlessly mocked for this boneheaded move in Congress

Democrats pulled out all the stops to throw a wrench into President Donald Trump’s Tuesday evening speech to a joint session of Congress, but their antics mostly amounted to one ejected lawmaker and some icy stares from Vice President JD Vance and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA).

The drama kicked off early when Rep. Al Green (D-TX) got the boot from the chamber just as Trump started talking.

Left behind, his fellow Democrats parked themselves in a grim, silent protest—broken only by a few boos—clutching signs that looked like auction paddles emblazoned with anti-Trump jabs. Applause? Standing? Not a chance.

Trump didn’t let it slide. He called them out right off the bat, pointing out they’d “never clap for me no matter how great my accomplishments were,” then powered through his speech undeterred.

As he spoke, Vance and Johnson occasionally shot piercing looks across the aisle, zeroing in on the Democrats’ stonewalling.

The peanut gallery on X caught every second of it, lighting up the platform with reactions to Vance and Johnson’s unspoken commentary.

“JD Vance is like the dad the Democrats never had,” one user quipped.

“I love watching Mike Johnson and JD Vance giving Democrats really dirty looks for acting like listless s***s,” Twitchy’s Sam Janney chimed in.

“JD Vance is the ultimate wingman for Trump. I’m living for the daggers he stares at Dems when they get belligerent and start shouting. You always gotta have a guy like that in your circle,” Jason Howerton posted.

Miranda Devine weighed in: “Love how JD Vance keeps looking over at the Democrats and smiling.”

“Vance Glance strikes again,” another user noted.

“JD Vance is all of us right now how he’s eyeballing the democrats,” one posted.

“JD Vance and Speaker Johnson are up there giving someone on the democrats side the same look my momma used to give me when I was acting up in church,” another added.

The night may have been a Democratic fumble—disruptions sidelined, optics shaky—but Trump pressed on, backed by Vance and Johnson’s steely resolve.

X lit up with fans of the duo’s quiet firepower, proving the real showdown wasn’t just in the speech, but in the stares that said it all.