It is no secret that Kamala Harris hates this country. But no one expected her to go this far.

And Kamala has made a stunning decision and turns her back on America.

Vice President Kamala Harris has made a decision that has raised eyebrows across political and charitable circles alike—she will skip the long-standing Al Smith Dinner in New York this October.

As Donald Trump confirms his attendance at the 79th iteration of the event hosted by the Archdiocese of New York, Harris is opting out, choosing instead to hit the campaign trail in key battleground states. This move breaks with a tradition observed by presidential candidates since the 1960s, with only one exception: Walter Mondale in 1984.

The Al Smith Dinner, a staple of American political life, is more than just a charity event. It is an evening where political rivals come together to put aside their differences, sharing the stage in a display of civility and humor for the greater good.

It’s an opportunity for politicians to engage in friendly roasts, offering a light-hearted break from the intensity of their campaigns. However, this year, Vice President Harris has chosen to sit out, raising questions about her commitment to the principles of unity and bipartisan goodwill.

The Al Smith Dinner, named after Alfred E. Smith, the first Catholic nominee for president, has long been a forum for political figures to show that, despite their differences, they can come together in support of a charitable cause.

It raises millions of dollars each year to benefit children and families in need, making it an event that transcends politics and focuses on helping the less fortunate. Candidates from John F. Kennedy to Donald Trump himself have shared the stage, engaging in light-hearted banter that contrasts with the harsh rhetoric often heard on the campaign trail.

This year, Joseph Zwilling, spokesperson for the Archdiocese of New York, expressed disappointment in Harris’s decision to skip the event. “We are disappointed that she will not be with us, as this is an evening of unity and putting aside political differences in support of a good cause of helping women and children in need regardless of race, creed, or background,” he said. Zwilling added, “We hope she reconsiders.”

In an era where political division is at an all-time high, Harris’s absence sends a clear message: the Democratic Party is more focused on maintaining power than on bridging divides or helping those in need. Her campaign’s rationale that she would attend only “as president in office” if elected smacks of arrogance, as though she feels the event is beneath her unless she holds the highest office in the land.

In contrast, Donald Trump has confirmed his attendance at the event, demonstrating once again his willingness to engage with Americans across political and religious lines. Trump, known for his larger-than-life personality, is expected to participate in the dinner’s long-standing tradition of lighthearted jabs and self-deprecating humor, showing that while he can be tough on the campaign trail, he understands the value of unity and charity.

Trump’s attendance is particularly significant as it comes at a time when the former president is facing immense political opposition, not only from the Democratic Party but from within the establishment media.

Yet, despite the endless attacks, Trump remains committed to honoring traditions like the Al Smith Dinner, which reflect the best of America’s democratic process—cordiality and respect, even amid fierce political disagreements.

By stepping up to attend the dinner, Trump is not only demonstrating his personal resilience but also his understanding of the importance of maintaining traditions that promote unity, charity, and goodwill. His participation this year sends a strong message that no matter the political climate, certain values must be preserved.

Kamala Harris’s refusal to attend the Al Smith Dinner is symptomatic of a broader problem within the Democratic Party. The once-celebrated ideals of unity and bipartisanship have been tossed aside in favor of a relentless pursuit of political dominance. By declining this invitation, Harris is not just avoiding Trump—she’s avoiding an opportunity to show the American people that she is capable of reaching across the aisle for the greater good.

This decision also speaks volumes about the crumbling state of the Democratic Party. Despite their best efforts to rally around Harris, she continues to falter in public opinion, even within her own party. Polls show that Democrats are increasingly divided, with many defecting to support Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign. The party’s leadership appears desperate, and Harris’s choice to prioritize campaigning in battleground states over a time-honored charity event reveals the party’s nervousness as they try to maintain their grip on power.

Moreover, this decision to skip the dinner raises questions about Harris’s priorities. If she truly cared about bringing the country together, this would have been the perfect platform to demonstrate her willingness to engage in the spirit of bipartisanship and charity. Instead, her campaign strategy seems to be focused solely on appealing to the Democratic base, doubling down on divisive rhetoric rather than working to heal a deeply polarized nation.

The Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner is far more than a political event; it represents an opportunity to give back to the community. The funds raised from this event go toward helping women and children in need, providing essential services to some of New York City’s most vulnerable populations.

Harris’s decision to forgo this event in favor of campaigning underscores the lack of genuine concern from the current administration for those most in need.

For decades, presidential candidates have recognized the significance of this event, understanding that it is a platform to show that, beyond politics, they care about the American people—particularly the less fortunate. The fact that Harris is the first candidate since 1984 to skip the event speaks volumes about the direction the Democratic Party is headed. The Al Smith Dinner is not just about who attends; it’s about what it represents—unity, compassion, and a willingness to set aside differences for the sake of a greater cause.

In contrast to Harris, Trump’s attendance at the Al Smith Dinner reaffirms his commitment to maintaining the values and traditions that make America great. While the Democrats focus on their narrow political interests, Trump remains the candidate who stands for the American people, regardless of their background or political affiliation.

He understands that America is stronger when its leaders are willing to come together for the common good, and his participation in this year’s dinner is just one more example of his dedication to the country.

By attending the dinner, Trump will not only be helping raise millions for charity, but he will also be sending a message of hope and unity at a time when the country needs it most. His presence at the Al Smith Dinner is a reminder that even in the face of intense political division, there are still opportunities to come together for the benefit of all Americans.

Kamala Harris’s decision to skip the Al Smith Dinner is a clear indication of where the Democratic Party’s priorities lie. Rather than embracing unity and compassion, Harris has chosen to focus on divisive campaigning, leaving behind a tradition that has long brought Americans together.

On the other hand, Donald Trump’s decision to attend the event highlights his commitment to preserving the values of unity and charity that are so desperately needed in today’s political climate.

As Harris heads to battleground states in a desperate attempt to secure her political future, Trump will be standing on a stage in New York, raising millions for those in need and reminding the American people that, despite our differences, we are stronger together.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Trump is in immense danger, and he knows it. But now things are heating up.

And Trump has voiced major concerns that could change this whole election cycle.

Former President Donald Trump, who has long been a vocal critic of the Biden-Harris administration’s immigration policies, expressed deep concerns about the safety of his family and the American people during a recent interview.

Speaking with Fox News host Brian Kilmeade, Trump addressed the growing danger posed by illegal immigration and highlighted his personal experience with multiple assassination attempts, emphasizing that these threats extend beyond his own safety and affect the safety of “everybody” in America.

Trump says he does "worry" about his family's safety after two attemped assassination attempts and about Americans' safety after four years of mass illegal immigration in Fox News interview. pic.twitter.com/YK5PLCaV2J

— David Krayden (@DavidKrayden) September 22, 2024

In an America increasingly “overrun with illegal immigrants,” as Trump described, the consequences of open-border policies are now being felt in communities across the nation. His comments come just days after a Sept. 15 assassination attempt in West Palm Beach and two months after he was shot in the ear while addressing a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

Despite these direct attacks, Trump’s focus remains on the broader threats facing the country, which he links to the influx of illegal immigrants and the Biden administration’s failure to secure the borders.

Trump’s candid remarks during the interview reflect not just a personal anxiety but also a deep concern for the American public. When asked whether he worries about his family’s safety, given the assassination attempts and other dangers he has encountered, Trump responded, “I do. I don’t talk about it, but I do. I have to worry about family. I have to worry about everybody. I worry about you.”

These statements are particularly alarming as they paint a picture of a former president who not only fears for his loved ones but also for the safety of everyday citizens.

Trump’s assassination attempts highlight a troubling lapse in security and raise questions about the United States Secret Service (USSS), which failed to adequately protect him during these high-profile incidents.

One of the most concerning aspects of the July 13 assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, was that the attacker, Ryan Wesley Routh, a 58-year-old Democratic activist, managed to bypass security and shoot Trump in the ear during a rally. Though Trump survived, the incident was a grim reminder of the threats that loom over his campaign for the 2024 presidential election.

Routh, who reportedly had camped out near Trump’s West Palm Beach golf course for 12 hours before being apprehended, evaded detection by the USSS, who had failed to search the perimeter. This oversight, as admitted by Acting USSS Director Ronald Rowe, was based on the flawed reasoning that Trump’s golf game wasn’t on his “official schedule.”

While Trump’s personal safety is clearly at risk, his broader concern for the American public stems from what he describes as a country “under siege” by illegal immigration.

During the interview, Trump explained how the Biden-Harris administration’s lax border policies have led to a dangerous influx of criminals, including terrorists and those released from prisons and mental institutions in their home countries.

“We’re under siege, and no country has ever suffered like we have for the last three-and-a-half, almost four years,” Trump said. “When they allow millions of people to come into our country, from prisons, right? From prisons. And terrorists, and people from mental institutions, and they take over our parks.”

Trump’s observations resonate with many Americans who have witnessed firsthand the effects of unchecked illegal immigration in their own communities. New York City, once a symbol of American pride and opportunity, has now become a haven for illegal immigrants, with city parks being overrun, and the average citizen suffering from rising crime and deteriorating public spaces.

Trump’s pointed remark, “Look at New York – you can’t play Little League baseball anymore,” serves as a metaphor for the broader societal decay that open-border policies have enabled.

The former president has long been an advocate for stronger border security, building his initial 2016 presidential campaign around the promise to construct a border wall. Under the Trump administration, significant progress was made in curbing illegal immigration, but since Biden took office, the number of illegal immigrants crossing into the U.S. has surged.

With this influx has come an increase in violent crime, drug trafficking, and human smuggling, leaving American citizens more vulnerable than ever before.

The Biden-Harris administration’s apparent indifference to these dangers is not only a failure in leadership but also a direct threat to national security. As Trump pointed out, America is now grappling with criminals who have been released from foreign prisons, individuals with ties to terrorist organizations, and those who are mentally unstable, many of whom are now walking freely in U.S. cities and towns.

The lack of vetting for these individuals has put millions of Americans at risk, particularly in border states where law enforcement is already overwhelmed.

Trump’s worries are not limited to the safety of the American people; he also expressed concerns about the fairness of the upcoming vice-presidential debate between Republican candidate Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) and Democratic candidate Gov. Tim Walz (D-MN).

The debate, which will be moderated by CBS News anchors Margaret Brennan and Norah O’Donnell, is expected to be contentious. Trump, however, believes that Vance won’t be given a fair chance to present his platform, but he remains confident in his running mate’s ability to perform well.

“He won’t get a fair shot. But he will handle it very good,” Trump said. “I think he’s done great. People are really liking him. He’s tough, smart, he loves our country. He’s going to have no trouble.”

Trump’s comments highlight a growing distrust in the mainstream media’s handling of political debates, particularly after his own experience during the presidential debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, where the ABC moderators were widely criticized for their bias against him. As the evidence mounts of unfair treatment by the media, Trump’s supporters are becoming increasingly skeptical of the role that networks like CBS and ABC will play in the upcoming election.

In the aftermath of the assassination attempts, criticism of the United States Secret Service (USSS) has reached a fever pitch. Acting Director Ronald Rowe’s admission that the agency failed to search the perimeter of the West Palm Beach golf course before Trump’s appearance has only fueled concerns that the former president’s security is being neglected.

The fact that an armed individual, motivated by political opposition, was able to camp out undetected for 12 hours before attempting to assassinate Trump speaks to a grave failure in the USSS’s ability to protect one of the most recognizable figures in the world.

The repeated failures of the USSS in safeguarding Trump call into question whether political bias within federal institutions has compromised their ability to fulfill their duties impartially. In an America where political violence is on the rise, the Secret Service must be held accountable for their lapses in judgment and must take immediate steps to ensure that these mistakes are not repeated.

Donald Trump’s interview with Brian Kilmeade served as a sobering reminder of the dangers facing both the former president and the American public. With illegal immigration spiraling out of control and federal institutions failing to provide adequate protection, Americans are left feeling vulnerable in their own country. As Trump continues his campaign for the 2024 presidency, he will undoubtedly make border security and the safety of the American people central issues in his platform. But with assassination attempts, media bias, and a country under siege by illegal immigrants, it’s clear that the road ahead will be fraught with challenges.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Democrats are trying to rally together around Harris. But it just isn’t working.

And Democrats are dealing with a new betrayal after a huge Trump endorsement comes from within.

In a recent Democrat Party development, Ameer Ghalib, the Muslim mayor of Hamtramck, Michigan, has thrown his support behind Donald Trump for the 2024 presidential election.

Ghalib, who represents the only Muslim-majority city in the United States, made his endorsement clear in a heartfelt Facebook post, citing Trump’s leadership and principles as the driving factors behind his decision.

This endorsement is more than just another political switch; it’s a significant indication of the growing fracture within the Democratic Party, especially as more Americans, including minority communities, are deserting the sinking ship to support Trump.

Mayor Ghalib’s decision to back Donald Trump may seem like a surprise to some, but to those closely watching the Democratic Party’s downward spiral, it comes as no shock.

Ghalib, in his Facebook post, admitted that while he doesn’t agree with Trump on every issue, he appreciates Trump’s unwavering commitment to his principles. He emphasized, “President Trump and I may not agree on everything, but I know he is a man of principles.”

This stark contrast in leadership is exactly what has led Ghalib, and many others, to turn away from the Democratic Party. It’s no secret that under the Biden-Harris administration, foreign policy blunders, increasing inflation, and out-of-control illegal immigration have hurt everyday Americans. Now, Ghalib, who once stood with the Democratic Party, is making it clear that Trump is the leader this nation needs.

Ghalib’s words carried a sense of urgency as he laid out his reasons for supporting Trump: “Though it’s looking good, he may or may not win the election… but I believe he is the right choice for this critical time. I’ll not regret my decision no matter what the outcome would be.” It’s a sentiment shared by millions of Americans who have grown tired of the false promises and failures of the Biden-Harris regime.

The Democratic Party is in trouble, and they know it. For months, the party has been desperately trying to rally around Kamala Harris, painting her as the heir apparent to Joe Biden’s political legacy.

But let’s be honest, it isn’t working. Not only has Harris failed to gain significant traction in the polls, but her track record as vice president has left much to be desired. Her bungled handling of immigration, foreign policy missteps, and inability to connect with the American public have made her one of the least effective vice presidents in modern history.

The endorsement of Donald Trump by a prominent Muslim Democrat only further illustrates how far Harris and the Democrats have fallen out of favor with their own base. Ghalib is not just some fringe figure—he is a respected leader in a city that represents a major segment of the Democratic voter bloc.

When officials in Hamtramck attempted to impose the radical Left’s agenda by flying Pride flags on public property, Ghalib and the city council took action by banning the flags and firing those responsible. It was a bold stand for traditional values and a rejection of the radical social agenda being pushed by the Democrats.

What’s even more telling is that Ghalib is not alone. Across the nation, Democratic voters, including Muslim and other minority groups, are questioning their allegiance to a party that no longer seems to represent their values.

The Biden administration’s unwavering support for military aid to Israel and its handling of the conflict in Gaza has alienated many Muslim voters, including Ghalib, who expressed deep concern about the administration’s role in the deaths of thousands of Palestinians. This disillusionment is pushing more and more people toward Trump, a man they see as a leader who prioritizes peace and the interests of the American people.

In a recent interview with Breitbart, Donald Trump expressed his admiration for Ghalib’s leadership and pointed out the stark differences between his administration and that of Joe Biden’s.

“I was very impressed with him and he was a very big fan of the Trump administration because he saw no wars — outside of defeating ISIS, but I inherited that — but there were no wars. There was no October 7. There was no Russian attack on Ukraine. He sees that and he told me — he saw a world that was at peace. Now, we have a world that’s going to end up in World War 3 and I can stop that. I’m the only one that’s going to stop that.” Trump said.

It’s clear that many Americans, including Ghalib, are longing for the stability and peace that characterized the Trump administration. Under Trump, America wasn’t entangled in unnecessary foreign wars, and the economy was thriving. But under Biden and Harris, the world is inching closer to World War III, as instability in Ukraine and the Middle East continues to spiral out of control.

The stark reality is that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have failed to deliver on their promises, and it’s becoming increasingly obvious that their leadership is eroding the very foundations of the Democratic Party. As Trump rightly pointed out, “Now, we have a world that’s going to end up in World War 3 and I can stop that. I’m the only one that’s going to stop that.”

What Ghalib’s endorsement of Trump really shows is that the Democratic Party is in crisis. Despite their best efforts to rally support around Kamala Harris, their own voter base is deserting them in droves. The reality is that many Democrats simply don’t trust Harris. They’ve watched as she fumbled her responsibilities as vice president, from her disastrous handling of the border crisis to her lack of any meaningful accomplishments on the domestic front.

Meanwhile, Trump continues to gain momentum, not just among Republicans, but among disaffected Democrats, independents, and minority communities who feel betrayed by the Left. Ghalib’s invitation for Trump to open a campaign office in Hamtramck is just the beginning. As more and more voters like Ghalib begin to recognize Trump as the leader America needs, the Democratic Party is left in a state of disarray, unable to stem the tide of defections.

The Democratic Party’s attempt to rally behind Kamala Harris is failing, and Ameer Ghalib’s endorsement of Donald Trump is just the latest sign of their unraveling. As the Democrats continue to push radical policies and fail to deliver on their promises, more Americans are turning to Trump as the only leader who can restore peace, stability, and prosperity.

The endorsement from Ghalib, a Muslim Democrat from a traditionally blue city, serves as a warning to the Democratic establishment: your base is crumbling, and Trump is ready to lead the American people once again.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

The Biden administration spent most of its term claiming that the border crisis was not a problem. Now they are rapidly backpedaling.

And a Biden official has made a surprising admission that reveals the truth about it all

Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell confirmed on Monday that the millions of illegal immigrants who have crossed the southern border under the Biden-Harris administration are directly contributing to rising unemployment in America.

Powell’s comments came in response to a reporter’s question regarding the labor market and how the influx of undocumented workers has impacted job creation and job loss.

House Speaker Mike Johnson wasted no time drawing attention to Powell’s remarks, posting on X, “The Federal Reserve Chairman admitted the massive influx of illegal immigrants under Biden and Harris has raised the unemployment rate. This administration’s refusal to secure the border is actively harming American workers and our economy.”

The Federal Reserve Chairman admitted the massive influx of illegal immigrants under Biden and Harris has raised the unemployment rate.

This administration’s refusal to secure the border is actively harming American workers and our economy. pic.twitter.com/3rryXkKTAs

— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) September 18, 2024

During his discussion, Powell responded to a question about whether “labor market cooling” would result in job loss. His answer was striking: “It depends on the inflows, right? So if you’re having millions of people come into the labor force, then you’re creating 100,000 jobs.”

Powell acknowledged the influx of millions of illegal immigrants into the U.S. labor market, adding, “We understand there’s been quite an influx across the borders, and that has actually been one of the things that’s allowed the unemployment rate to rise.”

This candid acknowledgment confirms what many conservatives have long suspected: the Biden administration’s open-border policies are actively undermining the American labor market by creating more competition for jobs.

Powell’s statement is a far cry from the empty promises the administration continues to peddle. The consequences of these policies are being felt by hardworking Americans who are watching their job opportunities evaporate as millions of illegal immigrants flood the labor market, creating a surplus of workers that drives down wages and raises the unemployment rate.

This latest revelation from the Federal Reserve chairman adds to the growing list of failures by the Biden-Harris administration to secure our southern border. Since taking office, President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have overseen an unprecedented border crisis that has allowed millions of illegal immigrants to pour into the country, with no end in sight.

In fact, the administration has continued to not only neglect the border but actively exacerbate the problem. Harris, who was appointed by Biden in March 2021 to address the “root causes” of migration, has yet to make any meaningful progress.

Instead, the administration has pursued policies that encourage illegal immigration while ignoring the strain it places on the American worker and economy.

Harris has repeatedly promised to fix the issue, but as former President Donald Trump pointed out during the September 3 presidential debate, Harris has failed to take action despite being in the White House for nearly four years.

When asked about the border crisis, Harris claimed that she would handle it “on day one” if elected. Trump rightly challenged her on this, asking why she hasn’t done anything already if she truly believes in securing the border. After all, she’s been in charge of this issue for years now.

Powell’s admission that the massive influx of illegal immigrants is hurting the U.S. labor market should serve as a wake-up call to all Americans. Biden and Harris have spent the last four years catering to the radical left, ignoring the cries of everyday Americans who are struggling to find jobs and make ends meet.

The border crisis is no longer just a national security issue; it’s an economic one. With millions of illegal immigrants entering the country, competing for jobs, and suppressing wages, it is clear that the Biden-Harris administration has turned its back on American workers. Rather than protect the interests of American citizens, they’ve chosen to prioritize the needs of those who enter the country illegally.

The impact of these policies has been devastating. Industries that rely on lower-wage workers, such as construction, agriculture, and hospitality, are being flooded with a surplus of labor, driving down wages for everyone. American workers, many of whom are already struggling in the current economic climate, are being forced to compete with illegal immigrants for jobs that should go to legal residents and citizens.

Let’s be clear: the current border crisis is not an accident or an oversight. It is a direct result of the policies put in place by the Biden-Harris administration and their allies on the left. From day one, this administration has embraced policies that encourage illegal immigration, turning a blind eye to the overwhelming consequences it has on our economy and workforce.

Biden and Harris have gone out of their way to ensure that illegal immigrants are protected, even at the expense of American citizens. They’ve fought to end Trump-era policies like the “Remain in Mexico” program and border wall construction, which had helped reduce illegal crossings. Instead, they’ve embraced policies that fly illegal immigrants from the border to destinations across America, often without notifying state or local authorities.

These actions have sent a clear message to would-be illegal immigrants: if you make it across the border, you will be welcomed with open arms. It’s no surprise, then, that illegal border crossings have skyrocketed under Biden’s watch, overwhelming Border Patrol agents and creating dangerous conditions at the southern border.

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell’s comments on the impact of illegal immigration on the labor market are a damning indictment of the Biden-Harris administration’s economic policies. The flood of illegal immigrants into the U.S. workforce has undermined job creation and led to rising unemployment, particularly among lower-wage workers.

This is the inevitable outcome of a White House that prioritizes political correctness over the needs of everyday Americans. For years, conservatives have warned about the dangers of open-border policies, and now, those warnings are coming to fruition. The American people are paying the price for this administration’s reckless policies, with fewer jobs, lower wages, and rising unemployment.

Powell’s remarks make it clear that the Biden-Harris administration has not only failed to protect our borders but has also actively harmed the American economy by allowing millions of illegal immigrants to enter the country. Rather than address the crisis, Biden and Harris continue to double down on their disastrous policies, leaving American workers in the lurch.

The contrast between the Trump administration’s border policies and the current crisis under Biden could not be more stark. During his time in office, former President Donald Trump made border security a top priority, implementing policies that dramatically reduced illegal immigration and protected American jobs. His administration’s efforts to build the border wall, reinstate “Remain in Mexico,” and crack down on illegal immigration were successful in curbing the influx of undocumented workers.

Trump understood that a secure border is essential not only for national security but for the health of our economy. By enforcing immigration laws and prioritizing the needs of American citizens, Trump protected American jobs and ensured that legal immigrants had a fair chance to succeed.

As Powell’s remarks confirm, the Biden-Harris administration’s open-border policies are actively harming the American economy and workforce. Their refusal to secure the southern border has allowed millions of illegal immigrants to flood the labor market, leading to rising unemployment and suppressed wages for hardworking Americans.

It’s time for accountability. The American people deserve leaders who will prioritize their interests and protect their jobs, not cater to radical left-wing agendas that undermine our country’s economic security. President Trump’s successful border policies serve as a roadmap for restoring order and prosperity to our nation. With his return to the White House, we can put an end to the border crisis and get America back on track.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

The Biden administration is full of corruption. But no one thought things would get this far.

And now, a leading Republican Governor has discovered this terrifying secret about the Biden administration.

In a bombshell interview Thursday night, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis revealed that federal investigators are refusing to cooperate with state officials in their investigation into the second assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump.

This alarming development raises serious concerns about the Biden-Harris administration’s willingness to provide transparency in a case that could have resulted in the tragic loss of a former president and current Republican frontrunner.

Speaking with Laura Ingraham on Fox News, DeSantis did not mince words. After signing an executive order earlier this week authorizing Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to conduct a criminal investigation, DeSantis emphasized the gravity of the situation and the clear obstruction the state has encountered from federal authorities.

“The answer is ‘no,’ they’re not being cooperative,” DeSantis told Ingraham. “I am concerned. For example, we were rebuffed, our investigators were rebuffed just going to the fence line outside of Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach.”

Tonight I joined Laura Ingraham to discuss Florida’s investigation into the assassination attempt of Donald Trump. pic.twitter.com/k0OyUJDvr7

— Ron DeSantis (@GovRonDeSantis) September 19, 2024

This is not just a matter of inconvenience or bureaucratic red tape. The refusal by federal authorities to cooperate with the state of Florida is an outrageous overreach by the Biden administration, which appears to be playing politics with an investigation that could have resulted in a deadly attack on a former president. DeSantis’ comments highlight the disturbing trend of federal interference, raising the question: what are they hiding?

The governor made it clear that this obstruction was not a one-time incident but part of a larger pattern of refusal to allow the state to conduct its own lawful investigation. “The Biden-Harris administration does not want the state of Florida to be involved in the investigation,” DeSantis said. “I don’t expect them to cooperate at all.”

This is not the first time questions have arisen about the Biden administration’s treatment of Donald Trump. Whether it’s the weaponization of federal agencies against Trump or the continued efforts by Democrats to smear and sideline him, this latest act of blocking Florida’s investigation only adds fuel to the fire of suspicion.

Governor DeSantis’ decision to initiate a state-level investigation was not only reasonable but necessary. He pointed out that multiple violations of Florida law likely occurred across various jurisdictions during the assassination attempt.

“We think at least three judicial circuits, this guy … committed potential violations of Florida law. So we have a duty to investigate this. We have a duty to bring the appropriate charges and we also have a duty to inform the public about how this happened,” DeSantis said.

In light of the federal government’s refusal to cooperate, Florida is stepping up to do what the Biden administration won’t: ensure a full, transparent investigation and hold any wrongdoers accountable. DeSantis’ strong stance in favor of law and order, even in the face of federal resistance, demonstrates a sharp contrast with the chaos and lack of accountability coming from the current administration.

The public has every right to demand answers. How could an assassin get that close to Donald Trump? How was this allowed to happen again, especially after a similar assassination attempt just two months prior? These are critical questions that DeSantis’ investigation seeks to address, even as the Biden administration drags its feet.

Governor DeSantis made it clear that one of his primary reasons for launching a state investigation is the lack of public trust in the federal investigation. “I don’t believe the public has any confidence in the investigation,” DeSantis said.

And who could blame the public for feeling that way? After all, this isn’t the first time federal agencies have come under fire for their handling—or mishandling—of high-profile investigations involving Trump.

DeSantis went a step further, outlining how his administration immediately took steps to ensure key evidence was preserved, something the federal government has a poor track record of doing. “So as soon as we got word of this on Sunday, I told our guys in state law enforcement, save all his social media because you know Facebook will delete it, the tech companies want to delete it,” DeSantis explained. This move is critical, especially considering how Big Tech has repeatedly shielded those with far-left ideologies from scrutiny while quickly silencing conservative voices.

The governor’s concerns also extended to how this assassin—who tried to shoot Trump at the Trump International Golf Club—ended up in Florida in the first place. “We need to know, how did he end up in Florida to begin with? What is this pathway this guy has taken to end up in those bushes trying to assassinate the former President of the United States and current Republican nominee?” DeSantis questioned.

These are valid concerns. The federal government’s apparent unwillingness to get to the bottom of this assassination attempt could potentially leave the public in the dark about key facts, including whether this individual was part of a broader plot or was influenced by the growing culture of political violence perpetuated by radical leftist rhetoric.

DeSantis also noted the federal government’s failure to answer questions about previous incidents of political violence, including the first assassination attempt on Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, and even the Las Vegas mass shooting several years ago. “We have not gotten answers about Butler,” DeSantis said, referring to the location where Trump was shot in July. “We have not gotten answers about things like that Las Vegas shooting from many years ago.”

These lingering questions only further erode public trust in federal investigations, and DeSantis is right to push for answers. His decision to authorize a state investigation underscores his commitment to transparency and accountability—something that appears sorely lacking in the current administration.

Let’s not mince words: the federal government’s refusal to cooperate with Florida’s investigation into the assassination attempt on Donald Trump is nothing short of an attack on justice and democracy. At a time when political violence is on the rise, the federal government should be doing everything in its power to ensure that the perpetrators are brought to justice. Instead, they are stonewalling Florida’s efforts, all while doing nothing to ensure the American people get the truth.

By refusing to fully investigate these incidents or cooperate with state authorities, the Biden-Harris administration is sending a chilling message: that political violence is acceptable, so long as it targets individuals they disagree with.

This is a dangerous precedent that could lead to further violence, and it’s why DeSantis’ actions are not just about defending Trump, but about defending democracy itself.

In a time when the federal government appears more interested in covering up than uncovering the truth, Governor Ron DeSantis is doing what every American should expect from their leaders: standing up for justice, law, and accountability. The federal government’s refusal to cooperate with Florida’s investigation into the second assassination attempt on Donald Trump is both alarming and unacceptable.

Governor DeSantis has made it clear that the state of Florida will not back down in its efforts to uncover the truth and hold those responsible accountable. As we approach the 2024 election, the American people deserve answers—not stonewalling, not political games, and certainly not a cover-up.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

The establishment media hates Trump. And now it seems they might have had a role to play in all of this.

And a new report has unveiled the terrifying truth about establishment media regarding the attempt on Trump’s life.

A new analysis conducted by the Media Research Center (MRC) found that 95 percent of the media coverage following the second assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump was overwhelmingly negative.

ABC, CBS, and NBC dedicated significant airtime to the event, but rather than focusing on the heinous act of violence and the disturbing trend of political assassination attempts, these networks chose to continue their anti-Trump crusade.

The blatant bias and dangerous rhetoric perpetuated by the establishment media are nothing new, but this time, it has crossed a line that should concern every American who values democracy and the safety of our political leaders.

In the wake of this assassination attempt, the media’s response wasn’t to condemn the violence unequivocally. Instead, they used the opportunity to attack Trump, downplay the threat, and even suggest that Trump’s own words were to blame. Such behavior from these media outlets is not just irresponsible; it’s dangerous.

According to the MRC’s findings, 70 percent of the campaign news airtime across these major networks was dedicated to the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. However, rather than portraying the seriousness of the incident or addressing the obvious threat to democracy posed by such violence, the networks’ commentary was heavily skewed against Trump.

Out of 21 evaluative comments reviewed by MRC, a shocking 20 were negative toward Trump, with only one positive remark—if it can even be considered that.

This is where the danger of establishment media becomes crystal clear. Instead of focusing on the increasing violence being directed toward a former president and current Republican frontrunner, the media chose to shift the narrative, blaming Trump’s rhetoric for the violence against him.

NBC’s Lester Holt, for example, wasted no time linking the assassination attempt to Trump’s supposed “fierce rhetoric” on the campaign trail, making it sound as if Trump himself was the cause of the violence targeted at him.

🚨 INSANE: NBC’s Lester Holt just blamed President Trump for the attempt on his life, saying it was due to his rhetoric on the illegal migrant crisis in Springfield

SERIOUSLY?

Who the HELL is buying this crap? pic.twitter.com/Otb7Lc1hB9

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 16, 2024

But perhaps the most egregious example came from CBS’s Norah O’Donnell. Instead of condemning the attempted assassination and the forces that could have incited such an act, O’Donnell turned her focus toward Trump’s remarks on immigration, implying that Trump’s words were responsible for “increasing the threat of political violence” in Springfield, Ohio.

CBS's Norah O'Donnell watched Lester Holt tie the 2nd attempted assassination of @realDonaldTrump to Springfield rhetoric last night and said, "hold my box wine" pic.twitter.com/MYfIImhHI3

— Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) September 17, 2024

It’s as if the media is suggesting that those who disagree with Trump’s policies or rhetoric are justified in turning to violence—a dangerous precedent that could encourage further political violence.

One glaring omission in the media’s coverage was the almost complete lack of attention to the role that left-wing rhetoric might have played in these assassination attempts. The suspect in this latest attempt, Ryan Wesley Routh, reportedly blamed “communist left rhetoric” for his violent actions.

This, however, was barely mentioned by the media. Instead, they quickly pivoted to attacking Trump, downplaying any potential responsibility that Democratic rhetoric may hold in fanning the flames of violence.

MRC’s analysis found that out of 48 minutes of coverage across these three networks, less than two minutes—1 minute and 53 seconds—were spent on exploring the possibility that violent, anti-Trump rhetoric from the left could be contributing to these assassination attempts. Two minutes.

That’s all the attention they gave to a legitimate concern that the left’s constant demonization of Trump and his supporters could be inciting violence.

Meanwhile, the media has spent years portraying Trump as a threat to democracy, labeling him and his supporters as extremists, racists, and even terrorists. It’s no surprise, then, that those who consume this steady diet of anti-Trump propaganda might be emboldened to commit violent acts. But rather than acknowledge this reality, the media brushes it aside, preferring to continue its vilification of Trump.

This isn’t the first time Trump has faced violence while the media remained largely silent. Just two months ago, Thomas Matthew Crooks attempted to assassinate Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, killing one person and wounding two others in the process. Yet the media’s response was lukewarm at best, and they quickly moved on from the story.

Contrast this with how the media handled the attack on Paul Pelosi. In that case, the media spent weeks discussing the political implications of the violence and pointing fingers at Republicans for allegedly inciting the attack.

But when Trump is the target, the rules change. The media seems almost eager to downplay the severity of the threat and move on, lest they have to grapple with the fact that their own rhetoric may be contributing to this wave of political violence.

The hypocrisy is staggering. Leftist figures and media outlets have routinely made incendiary remarks about Trump and his supporters. From Maxine Waters encouraging her followers to “push back” on Trump administration officials to rhetoric from prominent Democrats painting Trump as an existential threat to democracy, the vitriol has been constant.

Yet when violence erupts, the media ignores these provocations and instead seeks to blame Trump for the very violence directed at him.

It’s no wonder that millions of Americans feel that the establishment media is out to get Trump. The constant negative coverage, the refusal to hold Democrats accountable, and the media’s eagerness to blame Trump for everything under the sun, even assassination attempts, is enough to make anyone skeptical of the media’s motives. The American people are fed up with the media’s anti-Trump bias and their refusal to acknowledge the dangers of the left’s rhetoric.

Donald Trump continues to stand strong in the face of these threats, showing more resilience and courage than the media ever will. While they may attempt to silence him through negative coverage and biased reporting, Trump’s message resonates with everyday Americans. They see through the lies and propaganda. They know that Trump is fighting for them, for their jobs, for their families, and for their freedom.

The establishment media has shown, once again, that they are not interested in truth or objectivity. They are interested in one thing: stopping Donald Trump at any cost, even if it means downplaying assassination attempts and shifting the blame onto the victim. Their dangerous rhetoric is a threat to democracy and free speech, and it must be called out for what it is.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Joe Biden is a liar, and he doesn’t care about the American people. And now the whole world can see how bad things are.

Because Biden has made a stunning admission that exposes his past lies.

On Thursday, President Biden made headlines with the announcement of a $7.3 billion investment into rural electrification projects as part of the much-debated Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The administration’s decision to funnel billions of dollars into green energy initiatives has reignited the debate over the purpose and effectiveness of this massive spending package.

During a speech in Westby, Wisconsin, Biden’s comments raised eyebrows and added to the confusion surrounding the true intent of the Inflation Reduction Act. In what appeared to be a slip-up, Biden suggested that the bill wasn’t actually about reducing inflation, leaving many Americans wondering what this legislation was really meant to accomplish.

Biden on the Inflation Reduction Act: "We should have named it what it was." pic.twitter.com/yfWvXxk0x3

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) September 5, 2024

Biden’s statement, which came while promoting his administration’s new rural electrification project, was particularly telling: “I’m proud to announce that my investments, through my investments, the most significant climate change law ever – and by the way, it is a $369 billion bill – it’s called the, we should have named it what it was.”

This slip of the tongue has left critics questioning whether the Inflation Reduction Act was ever intended to tackle inflation in the first place, or if it was just another green energy boondoggle hidden behind a misleading title.

Biden’s remarks, whether intentional or not, only serve to confirm what many conservatives have been saying since the IRA’s inception: the bill has little to do with reducing inflation and everything to do with pushing a radical green agenda.

Signed into law in August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act passed Congress along strict party lines, with no Republican support. Vice President Kamala Harris cast the tie-breaking vote in the Senate, solidifying the bill’s passage and launching what Democrats hailed as a historic piece of climate legislation.

From the start, Republicans have been vocal in their opposition to the act, calling it a wasteful spending spree under the guise of economic relief. Despite its title, the IRA directs billions of taxpayer dollars toward green energy projects, including solar, wind, and now rural electrification.

The $7.3 billion investment announced this week will be distributed across 16 cooperatives providing electricity to rural areas in 23 states, as part of a broader $13 billion allocation for rural electrification programs. While the Biden administration has touted this investment as a way to bring power to underserved communities, critics argue that it’s yet another example of Democrats using taxpayer money to fund their green energy priorities.

When the Inflation Reduction Act was first proposed, Americans were grappling with record inflation, high gas prices, and skyrocketing grocery bills. Many saw the bill as a potential lifeline that would help ease the economic burden on working-class families. Instead, the law turned out to be a massive green energy spending plan, with very little focus on inflation. In fact, President Biden has admitted this fact multiple times.

During a speech in Utah earlier this year, Biden echoed his recent comments in Wisconsin, saying he shouldn’t have called the bill the Inflation Reduction Act because “it has less to do with reducing inflation than it has to do with providing alternatives that generate economic growth.” It’s clear that even the President himself sees the IRA for what it truly is: a climate change law, not an economic relief package.

Republicans and conservative economists have long pointed out the absurdity of naming a bill that focuses on green energy as an “Inflation Reduction Act.” According to many experts, the law will do little to bring down inflation or provide any real relief to struggling American families.

PBS News reported that economists have criticized the IRA, saying it “has just not been a significant factor” in lowering inflation rates. Yet the administration continues to claim victory, even as prices at the pump remain high and families struggle to make ends meet.

Biden’s announcement of the $7.3 billion investment in rural electrification is the latest example of the administration’s prioritization of green energy projects over actual economic solutions. While the administration claims the project will create 4,500 permanent jobs and 16,000 construction jobs, many conservatives are skeptical of these numbers and the long-term benefits of such investments.

Rural America, in particular, has been hit hard by the Biden administration’s policies. Rising fuel prices, inflation, and burdensome regulations have made life more difficult for farmers, ranchers, and small business owners across the country.

Instead of addressing these pressing issues, the Biden administration is once again pouring billions of dollars into unproven green energy projects, with little evidence that they will actually improve the lives of everyday Americans.

This rural electrification project is part of a broader push by the administration to “modernize” America’s energy grid and transition the country away from fossil fuels. While the administration touts this as a forward-thinking move, many conservatives see it as a blatant attempt to impose the Green New Deal on rural communities that are already struggling to survive.

The failure of the Inflation Reduction Act to address actual inflation is one of its most glaring flaws. As inflation continues to erode the purchasing power of American families, the Biden administration remains focused on its climate agenda.

Rather than tackling the root causes of inflation, such as excessive government spending and burdensome regulations, the administration is pouring money into green energy projects that may never deliver on their promises.

The $369 billion set aside for green energy in the IRA is a prime example of this misguided approach. Instead of providing immediate relief to Americans who are suffering under high inflation, the Biden administration is using taxpayer dollars to fund experimental energy projects that may take decades to yield results—if they ever do.

Congressional Republicans have made their opposition to the Inflation Reduction Act clear from the very beginning. Every single GOP member of the House and Senate voted against the bill, and many continue to criticize it as a wasteful and ineffective piece of legislation.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) has been particularly vocal in his criticism, calling the bill a “disaster” for the American economy. “This so-called Inflation Reduction Act does nothing to lower prices for working families,” McCarthy said last year. “It’s just a $369 billion slush fund for Democrats to push their radical climate agenda.”

Many conservatives share McCarthy’s sentiment, viewing the IRA as yet another example of the Democrats’ reckless spending and misplaced priorities. Instead of addressing the real issues facing American families, such as inflation, crime, and border security, Democrats are focused on pushing their progressive agenda, regardless of the cost.

President Biden’s $7.3 billion rural electrification investment is just the latest in a long line of green energy boondoggles funded by the Inflation Reduction Act. Despite its name, the IRA has done little to address inflation, and Biden’s own comments have confirmed that the bill was never really about inflation to begin with.

As Republicans continue to criticize the law and its impact on American families, the Biden administration remains focused on its climate change agenda, no matter the cost to the American taxpayer.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Trump’s campaign is constantly under attack from the Left. And things are heating up.

And a major Trump supporter has been hit with a massive court ruling that could end the whole campaign.

In a pivotal decision that could influence the upcoming presidential election, Dane County Circuit Court Judge Stephen Ehlke ruled on Monday that Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s name must remain on the ballot in the battleground state of Wisconsin.

Despite Kennedy’s recent endorsement of Republican candidate Donald Trump and his subsequent efforts to remove his name from ballots, Judge Ehlke declared that state law offers no provision for voluntary removal after nomination papers have been submitted—except in the case of a candidate’s death.

This ruling is a significant development in the high-stakes 2024 presidential election, where Wisconsin is expected to play a key role in determining the outcome. The decision reflects a broader legal battle that Kennedy has faced across the country as he seeks to have his name stricken from ballots in key states following his decision to drop out of the race as an independent and throw his support behind Trump.

In his ruling, Judge Ehlke emphasized the clarity of Wisconsin’s election laws. “The statute is plain on its face,” he stated.

According to Wisconsin law, once a presidential candidate has submitted the required nomination papers, their name cannot be removed from the ballot unless they have died. In Kennedy’s case, having already filed as an independent candidate for president, he was unable to voluntarily withdraw his name despite his recent political decisions.

“Mr. Kennedy has no one to blame but himself if he didn’t want to be on the ballot,” Ehlke added, suggesting that Kennedy’s legal maneuvering came too late in the process. While Kennedy and his legal team argued that his change in political alignment should allow for his name to be removed, the judge firmly rejected this reasoning.

Kennedy is now facing a tight timeline to appeal the decision, with clerks preparing to print Wisconsin’s election forms by Wednesday.

The Wisconsin elections commission had previously turned down his request for removal by a five-to-one margin, citing the same statute that Judge Ehlke relied on. Now, Kennedy’s legal team is expected to take their case to a state appellate court for a final decision.

The Wisconsin ruling is part of a larger legal effort by Kennedy to have his name removed from presidential ballots in several battleground states after deciding to endorse Trump.

Since Kennedy announced his departure from the race as an independent and aligned with Trump, he has sought to remove his name from ballots in at least 10 key states.

However, his efforts have been met with mixed results. In some states, Kennedy’s legal team has succeeded in their bid to have his name removed, while in others, courts have ruled against him.

Just last week, the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled in favor of Kennedy, ordering his name to be removed from state presidential ballots. The 4-3 decision was seen as a victory for the Kennedy-Trump alliance, with Kennedy’s supporters celebrating the removal as a step toward consolidating conservative voters behind Trump.

In contrast, the Michigan Supreme Court recently ruled against Kennedy, deciding that his name must remain on the state’s presidential ballots. Michigan’s decision was a blow to the Kennedy campaign, as the state remains one of the most critical battlegrounds in the 2024 election.

With the potential to split the conservative vote, Kennedy’s name on the ballot could siphon crucial votes away from Trump, complicating the Republican candidate’s path to victory.

The ruling in Wisconsin takes on added significance given the state’s importance in presidential elections. As one of the most fiercely contested battleground states, Wisconsin has been a focal point of both Republican and Democratic campaigns. In 2016, Donald Trump narrowly won the state by fewer than 23,000 votes, but in 2020, President Joe Biden flipped the state back to the Democrats by a similarly slim margin.

With both Trump and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris expected to face a tight race in Wisconsin, Kennedy’s presence on the ballot could have profound implications. Although Kennedy has endorsed Trump, his name on the ballot as an independent could lead to voter confusion or even split the conservative vote—an outcome that could ultimately benefit Harris.

This possibility has been a concern for Trump’s campaign, which had hoped that Kennedy’s endorsement would unify right-leaning voters. By remaining on the ballot in Wisconsin and other battleground states, Kennedy risks drawing votes away from Trump and complicating the Republican nominee’s efforts to secure victory.

Judge Ehlke’s ruling also highlights the importance of election integrity and adherence to the rule of law. While Kennedy’s legal team argued for flexibility in allowing his name to be removed from the ballot, the judge’s decision underscores the need for clear and consistent election laws. Once a candidate has followed the process to qualify for the ballot, they cannot simply change course without adhering to the established rules.

This legal clarity is crucial in battleground states like Wisconsin, where even minor discrepancies in the election process can have significant consequences. As the nation continues to debate issues of election integrity, the case of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. serves as a reminder of the importance of following the rule of law, even in the face of unexpected political developments.

With Wisconsin clerks preparing to print election ballots this week, Kennedy’s legal team will need to move quickly if they hope to appeal the ruling and remove his name from the ballot. The state appellate court has yet to weigh in on the matter, but time is running out.

For Trump’s campaign, the stakes couldn’t be higher. With Kennedy remaining on the ballot in key states like Wisconsin, Trump risks losing votes to a candidate who has already dropped out of the race. This outcome could give Kamala Harris and the Democrats an advantage in what is shaping up to be a close and fiercely contested election.

While Kennedy’s endorsement of Trump may have bolstered conservative enthusiasm, his continued presence on the ballot poses a significant risk to Republican unity. As the election draws closer, both Kennedy and Trump will need to navigate the legal and political challenges posed by this unexpected turn of events.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Since the second attempt on Trump’s life, people all across the world have realized that something is going on. And now, we might finally have answers.

Because a new discovery has unveiled the ties that Trump’s would-be assassin has to the Biden administration.

In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that the man arrested in connection to the second assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, Ryan Wesley Routh, had been flagged as a potential threat by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in 2023.

Despite these warnings and glaring red flags, Biden’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) declined to pursue the case, leaving a dangerous individual free to plan and nearly execute an attack on a former president of the United States.

This failure to act is yet another disturbing sign of the incompetence and neglect within the Biden administration, especially at a time when Americans are growing increasingly concerned about security, both at home and abroad. How could someone with such obvious ties to violence, militancy, and extremism slip through the cracks, even when flagged by U.S. authorities?

Ryan Wesley Routh was not some random individual; his background was well known to authorities long before his arrest for attempting to assassinate Donald Trump. In 2023, Routh was flagged by CBP officials after returning from Ukraine.

According to a report from Just The News, Routh admitted to CBP officials at the Honolulu airport that he had been involved in recruiting fighters from various countries, including Afghanistan, Moldova, and Taiwan, to fight in the Ukrainian war against Russia. Routh had traveled extensively, with documented visits to Warsaw, Poland (near the Ukraine border), and Istanbul, Turkey, in 2022 and 2023.

Routh even handed the CBP agents a business card listing him as the director of a group called the “International Volunteer Center,” which claimed to have connections with countries like Syria, Pakistan, and Israel. It was clear from this encounter that Routh was not just an ordinary traveler—he was someone with potentially dangerous global connections and motives. Yet, when CBP referred his case to Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the division shockingly declined to investigate.

The interview notes, which were later made public, stated, “Subject provided his recruiting business card… which lists his recruiting partners that he speaks with to recruit soldiers from Afghanistan, Romania, Pakistan, Syria, and Israel.”

Still, DHS and HSI refused to follow up on the case. The failure to investigate left Routh free to operate unchecked, ultimately leading to his attempted assassination of Donald Trump.

This failure by the Biden administration to act on a flagged individual is not only an example of gross negligence, but it also raises questions about where their priorities lie. Why did the DHS choose to ignore such a high-risk individual, especially someone with an international footprint and ties to known conflict zones?

This was not the first time Routh had been flagged by authorities. In fact, the FBI received a tip in 2019 alleging that Routh, a convicted felon, was in possession of a firearm. However, in another display of government incompetence, the FBI failed to take meaningful action.

While the agency did follow up on the tip and referred it to local law enforcement in Honolulu, no further investigation was carried out, and Routh continued to move freely.

Adding to the gravity of the situation, Routh has been vocal on social media about his support for Ukraine and even expressed a willingness to die for the country. His online presence was littered with pro-Ukraine sentiments and radical calls to action.

In 2023, he published a book titled Ukraine Must Win the Unwinnable War, in which he openly urged Iran to assassinate Donald Trump. Despite this extremist rhetoric, the Biden administration failed to take the necessary steps to neutralize this obvious threat to national security.

The horrific events of this past Sunday should have never happened. As former President Trump played golf in Florida, Secret Service agents noticed suspicious movement in the bushes near the course. Upon investigation, the agents spotted Routh armed with an AK-47-style rifle equipped with a scope. The suspect was immediately fired upon by the Secret Service but managed to flee the scene, only to be apprehended later on I-95.

Upon searching the area where Routh had been hiding, authorities discovered two backpacks filled with ceramic tiles and a GoPro camera, clear signs of premeditated intent to carry out the assassination. According to reports, Routh had been camping out on the perimeter of the golf course for 12 hours ahead of time, waiting for the perfect moment to strike.

This attempted assassination comes on the heels of a previous attempt in July when a gunman fired a bullet that narrowly missed Trump’s head. How many more times will it take before the Biden administration recognizes the grave threat to Trump’s life?

It is deeply concerning that an individual like Routh, who was so obviously flagged as a danger, was allowed to roam free, ultimately leading to an attempted assassination of a former president. The Biden administration’s failure to act on these warnings shows a dangerous level of incompetence and irresponsibility.

The question must be asked: Was this a case of neglect, or was there a more insidious motive behind DHS’s refusal to investigate Routh further? Given the ongoing political persecution of Trump and his supporters by the radical left, it’s not far-fetched to wonder if the Biden administration simply didn’t care to protect a political opponent like Trump.

This administration has made it clear that they will stop at nothing to undermine Trump, and their neglect in this case may very well be another example of their disregard for justice when it comes to protecting conservative figures.

The attempted assassination of a former president is not something that should be taken lightly. Yet, by ignoring the warnings about Routh, the Biden administration has demonstrated a shocking disregard for Trump’s safety and the safety of all Americans. It is clear that their priorities are woefully misplaced, allowing dangerous individuals like Routh to slip through the cracks while focusing on political witch hunts and weaponizing government agencies against their opponents.

This case also exposes the broader issue of national security failures under the Biden administration. If a dangerous individual like Routh can so easily evade scrutiny, who else is slipping through the cracks? The American people deserve answers, and more importantly, they deserve a government that takes these threats seriously.

The near-tragedy of this second assassination attempt on Donald Trump is a direct result of the Biden administration’s failure to act on clear warnings. The negligence shown by the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, and other agencies should alarm every American, regardless of political affiliation.

At the end of the day, it is the responsibility of the government to protect its citizens, especially a former president. In this case, the Biden administration has shown that it is either incapable or unwilling to fulfill that responsibility. The American people deserve better leadership—leadership that prioritizes safety and security over political games.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

The Radical media hates Trump and cannot help but spread lies about him. However, the truth comes out anyway.

And now the Radical media has been forced to admit this about Donald Trump.

In a telling moment on CBS News’ “CBS Mornings,” reporter Adriana Diaz gave a surprising update from the battleground state of Nevada that is sure to shock the liberal establishment.

While traveling through the Silver State, Diaz interviewed voters at local restaurants, and her findings were nothing short of remarkable. Despite the mainstream media’s relentless attempts to downplay Donald Trump’s popularity, Diaz couldn’t avoid the reality on the ground: Americans are excited about Trump.

The CBS segment, part of a series called “Three Meals,” seeks to take the pulse of voters leading up to the 2024 election by visiting various states and dining with residents. This week’s stop was Nevada, and while Diaz expected a wide variety of political opinions, what she found was a wave of enthusiasm for the former president, even in areas that have traditionally leaned Democratic.

Adriana Diaz’s revelation is striking for a number of reasons, but the most glaring one is the setting: mainstream media has largely written off Trump as a figure of the past, a leader whose political career should have been dead and buried after 2020.

Yet, as Diaz ventured into Nevada’s restaurants and engaged with ordinary people, the narrative spun by the radical left and their media allies was turned on its head. As Diaz herself admitted, “People are really excited about Trump.”

It wasn’t just one or two isolated conversations, either. Diaz and her crew traveled across Nevada, visiting multiple locations, asking people what matters most to them and who they support in the upcoming election. The overwhelming response was the same: support for Trump. Even more remarkable, according to Diaz, they could only find one supporter of Vice President Kamala Harris in all the restaurants they visited.

As Diaz explored the state, she uncovered a range of concerns that are driving voters toward Trump. One woman, when asked what was most important to her, gave a blunt and straightforward answer: “I’m extremely concerned about the border.”

This is a sentiment shared by millions of Americans who have watched, in horror, as the Biden-Harris administration has allowed chaos to reign at the southern border.

Under Biden and Harris, the United States has seen record numbers of illegal crossings, fentanyl trafficking, and human smuggling operations. The border is a disaster zone, and it’s clear that voters in battleground states like Nevada are paying attention.

Trump’s policies on border security, including his efforts to build the wall and implement stricter immigration enforcement, are resonating now more than ever.

Another telling moment came when a local food truck owner discussed the devastating impact inflation has had on his business. “Tacos used to be a dollar, $1.50, after the pandemic they don’t go under $3.50 to $4,” he said. The rising cost of food, housing, and everyday goods has hit working-class Americans hard. Bidenomics, with its reckless spending and anti-growth policies, has only exacerbated the situation.

For many, the answer to these economic woes is clear: bring back Trump and his proven economic policies that led to one of the strongest economies in modern history.

What’s particularly interesting about Diaz’s report is the clear enthusiasm for Trump, even in areas where Democrats have typically performed well. Nevada’s Latino community, which represents more than 20% of the state’s electorate, has long been a reliable voting bloc for the Democratic Party. But even here, Diaz found that voters are turning to Trump.

The Latino vote has become increasingly important in national elections, and in 2020, Trump made significant inroads with Latino voters. His strong stance on law and order, jobs, and economic opportunity resonated with many in this community.

Now, as the Biden administration continues to fumble on the economy, inflation, and border security, it’s no surprise that more and more Latinos are flocking to Trump’s America First message.

In fact, as Diaz’s report shows, Trump’s support cuts across all demographics. Whether it’s the border, inflation, jobs, or just a desire for strong leadership, Trump is the one people are looking to for answers. Diaz herself acknowledged that despite the numerous interviews conducted, only one Harris supporter could be found, and the enthusiasm for Trump was undeniable.

For CBS News—a mainstream outlet that typically skews to the left—this report was a rare and unfiltered look at the state of the electorate. The fact that a reporter from CBS was forced to admit that “people are really excited about Trump” speaks volumes about where America is heading as we approach the 2024 election.

Even in a network that has long been critical of Trump, the excitement for the former president is so obvious that it simply can’t be ignored. The mainstream media can try to suppress the excitement for Trump all they want, but as this report shows, it’s bubbling to the surface in places they least expected.

This enthusiasm for Trump comes at a time when the radical left is desperately trying to control the narrative. They’ve spent years demonizing Trump, falsely accusing him of everything under the sun, and attempting to frame him as an authoritarian. Yet, even as they’ve tried to bury his legacy, Trump has only grown stronger.

From Nevada to Florida, Ohio to Pennsylvania, and everywhere in between, the movement that Trump started is alive and well. The excitement for Trump’s return to the White House is palpable. And it’s not just among die-hard conservatives—it’s spreading among independents, working-class voters, and even former Democrats who are fed up with the incompetence and failure of the Biden-Harris administration.

The mainstream media can continue to push their anti-Trump agenda, but as Adriana Diaz’s report from Nevada shows, they can’t hide the truth: America is excited for Trump. Whether it’s concerns about the border, frustration with rising costs, or simply a desire for a leader who puts America first, voters are making it clear that they want Trump back in office.

The radical left and their allies in the media will undoubtedly try to downplay this enthusiasm, but it’s too big to ignore. Even CBS News, a network not known for being friendly to Trump, had to acknowledge that the people they spoke with are eager for Trump’s return.

In the coming months, as more reports like this come to light, it will become even more obvious: Trump’s support is not only strong, it’s growing. The silent majority is not so silent anymore, and they’re ready to take their country back.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The media wants to convince us that the Democrat party is unified against Trump. But that is simply not the case.

And a Democrat Senator has betrayed his party and threatened a massive subpoena.

Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) has threatened to use his committee’s subpoena power to force the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to comply with an investigation into two recent assassination attempts on former President Donald Trump.

As chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI), Blumenthal has taken an unusually aggressive stance against a department operating under the Biden-Harris administration, accusing DHS of “stonewalling” and failing to provide critical information needed to fully understand the failures that allowed these attempts on Trump’s life.

The two assassination attempts—just weeks apart—have not only shaken the political world but also revealed disturbing lapses in security protocols. These failures, combined with the DHS’s refusal to cooperate fully with the investigation, have raised serious concerns about the department’s commitment to transparency and the protection of high-profile political figures like Trump, who remains a leading candidate for the Republican nomination in 2024.

On July 13, a gunman’s bullet grazed Trump’s ear during a public appearance, narrowly missing the back of his head. While the Secret Service acted quickly to neutralize the threat, questions immediately arose about how the gunman had been able to get so close to the former president in the first place.

Just two months later, a second attempt on Trump’s life took place on September 15. Ryan Wesley Routh, a 58-year-old Democratic activist, was arrested after attempting to assassinate Trump with an AK-style firearm. Reports indicate that Routh had been camping near Trump’s West Palm Beach golf course for 12 hours, waiting for the opportunity to strike.

This second attempt raised even more questions about the competence of the Secret Service and DHS in protecting a former president who remains a central figure in American politics.

Both attempts have sparked outrage, not just among Trump supporters but across the political spectrum. Even Blumenthal, a Democrat who often clashed with Trump during his presidency, expressed frustration with the apparent lapses in security and the DHS’s lack of cooperation with his committee’s investigation.

In a rare move for a Democratic senator, Blumenthal has openly criticized the DHS, accusing the department of dragging its feet and withholding key information from his committee.

Speaking on Monday, Blumenthal described the DHS’s behavior as “almost derelict in its duty by resisting our requests for documents, evidence, and information that are necessary to investigate.”

Blumenthal’s frustration with the Biden-Harris administration is palpable. As the senior Democrat leading the probe, he has repeatedly asked for documentation and cooperation from DHS, yet has been met with delay tactics and excuses. His calls for transparency have been brushed off, and it’s clear that the senator is losing patience.

“We may need to require more cooperation from them. And we have the power to do so through the compulsory process. In other words, the subpoena power,” Blumenthal warned. His remarks came just days after he said that the DHS’s refusal to be forthcoming was not only an affront to his committee but to the American people, who deserve answers about how such high-profile security breaches were allowed to occur.

The fact that a senior Democrat is threatening to subpoena a department run by his own party’s administration is nothing short of extraordinary. It reveals just how serious the situation has become, and how deep the divide between political factions has grown, even within the Democratic Party.

For Blumenthal to take such a public stance against the Biden-Harris DHS suggests that the stonewalling is more than just bureaucratic inefficiency—it may be a deliberate attempt to avoid accountability.

Blumenthal has already hinted that his committee’s report on the first assassination attempt will be both shocking and appalling. He told Fox News, “I think the American people are going to be shocked, astonished, and appalled by what we will report to them about the failures by the Secret Service in this assassination attempt on the former president.”

This is a stunning statement from a senior senator, especially one who is not known for being friendly toward Trump. It underscores just how grave the security lapses were and raises the possibility that the failures weren’t just isolated incidents but symptoms of deeper, systemic problems within the agencies responsible for protecting high-profile political figures.

The DHS and Secret Service have long been considered pillars of national security, entrusted with protecting current and former presidents from harm. Yet, under the current administration, those agencies appear to have failed miserably in their duties.

How could a gunman get close enough to the former president to graze his ear with a bullet? How could a political activist, armed with an assault rifle, camp near Trump’s golf course for hours without being detected?

These questions demand answers. But instead of cooperating fully with the investigation, the DHS has chosen to stonewall, offering only partial information and delaying the process at every turn.

Blumenthal’s frustration is understandable. He’s leading a probe that could reveal profound weaknesses in the nation’s security apparatus, and yet the very agency responsible for those failures is refusing to be transparent. This is a national security issue, plain and simple. If the DHS can’t protect a former president, who can they protect?

The refusal of the DHS to fully cooperate with the investigation raises a disturbing question: Is the Biden-Harris administration more interested in protecting itself than protecting the former president?

Trump is not just any former president—he’s the frontrunner for the Republican nomination in 2024, and his continued political relevance makes him a target for both political and physical attacks.

While Blumenthal’s investigation focuses on security failures, the political implications cannot be ignored. The Biden-Harris administration has been relentless in its attacks on Trump, both politically and through various legal channels. Could their reluctance to cooperate with the investigation into the assassination attempts be part of a broader strategy to weaken Trump’s chances in 2024?

It’s a disturbing thought, but one that cannot be ruled out. After all, this is the same administration that has used every tool at its disposal to undermine Trump’s political career. From the multiple investigations and indictments to the non-stop negative media coverage, it’s clear that the Biden-Harris team sees Trump as their primary political opponent. Could the stonewalling by the DHS be part of that effort?

Blumenthal’s threat to use subpoena power is a sign that he’s not willing to let this issue go. The American people deserve to know the truth about what happened during the two assassination attempts on Trump’s life, and why the agencies tasked with protecting him failed so spectacularly.

If Blumenthal follows through on his threat, it could force the DHS to finally provide the information that has been so sorely lacking. But even if the DHS is compelled to cooperate, the damage has already been done. The stonewalling has cast a shadow over the Biden-Harris administration and raised serious doubts about their commitment to transparency and accountability.

At the end of the day, this isn’t just about Trump—it’s about the integrity of our national security apparatus. If the DHS can’t be trusted to protect a former president, what does that say about their ability to protect the nation?

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story and more.

Ever since being announced as Harris’ VP pick, Tim Walz has been in the spotlight. And his lies and horrible leadership have been exposed.

But now, Tim Walz has shocked the world with a new stunning display of incompetence.

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, now the Democratic nominee for Vice President alongside Kamala Harris, had a moment of glaring incompetence this week that left voters shaking their heads.

In an interview with a local CBS affiliate in Macon, Georgia, Walz was asked a simple yet crucial question: What would he and Kamala Harris do to help families struggling financially?

Instead of offering concrete solutions, Walz fumbled through a series of unrelated talking points, showcasing the Harris-Walz campaign’s glaring lack of a plan.

Reporter: "What do you tell people who wake up each morning wondering 'How am I going to get by financially?'"

Timothy Walz: Kamala and I are middle class folks. pic.twitter.com/uCEs7QfDnZ

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) September 17, 2024

The question posed to Walz should have been an easy one. With inflation skyrocketing, families across America are desperately seeking leadership that can offer real relief. But when asked for specifics on how he and Harris plan to help these struggling families, Walz’s response was nothing short of a disaster.

Rather than addressing the economic pain that everyday Americans are feeling, Walz offered a laundry list of proposals that either had nothing to do with inflation or were already part of Trump’s legacy.

Walz’s response started with an attempt to connect with middle-class families by claiming he and Kamala Harris understood their struggles. “I tell them Kamala Harris and I know something about it being middle-class folks. Our family sit at the table trying to pay the bill,” he said.

It was a patronizing and out-of-touch statement from someone who has spent most of his adult life in politics, not dealing with the harsh realities facing average Americans. His vague attempt at empathy quickly dissolved into a series of unrelated talking points that showed just how disconnected he and Harris are from the actual concerns of the American people.

Instead of addressing the elephant in the room—inflation—Walz offered a response that read like a laundry list of Democrat pet projects. He started by talking about home ownership, saying: “I think that’s why Kamala Harris has put out a plan — especially around home ownership — making sure we’re building 3 million more affordable homes, making sure we’re making the down payment assistance there.”

But what does building homes have to do with families struggling to pay their bills now? Home ownership is a worthy goal, but for families living paycheck to paycheck, dealing with skyrocketing grocery prices and utility bills, it’s not a solution that helps them today.

In fact, under the Biden-Harris administration, housing prices have surged, making home ownership less attainable for many Americans. Building homes is a long-term policy initiative, not an immediate answer to the inflationary crisis crippling the American middle class.

Walz then pivoted to another unrelated issue: lowering drug prices. While that sounds good on the surface, Walz conveniently forgot to mention that President Donald Trump had already taken significant steps to lower drug prices during his administration.

The Harris-Walz campaign is taking credit for initiatives they didn’t even start, and what’s worse, they’re falsely claiming it as a solution to an economic problem they’ve made worse.

Walz’s most glaring disconnect came when he began to tout infrastructure investments, claiming, “We’re investing in rural communities like the Investment Acts that have created a lot of new jobs in terms of infrastructure and other things. Those are things that we start to get a handle on it.” Infrastructure spending, again, is a long-term project. While improving roads and bridges is important, it does little to address the immediate financial woes that American families are grappling with today.

Moreover, the Biden-Harris administration’s so-called progress on infrastructure has been embarrassingly slow. Three years in, and they’ve managed to install just eight charging stations for electric vehicles. If that’s their measure of success, it’s no wonder families feel abandoned.

Walz’s inability to offer a direct, meaningful response to the question of inflation isn’t just a slip-up. It’s a clear indication that the Harris-Walz ticket has no concrete plan to fix the economic mess they’ve helped create. Instead of offering solutions, Walz delivered a series of tired Democrat talking points that don’t even begin to address the real concerns of Americans.

Perhaps most revealing of all was Walz’s blatant lie about Donald Trump’s approach to dealing with inflation. Walz claimed, falsely, that Trump’s plan involved a “national sales tax.” This is a complete fabrication. Trump has never proposed a national sales tax.

Instead, what Walz is referring to is Trump’s use of tariffs, which were aimed at protecting American industries and creating jobs at home—an approach that helped boost the American economy before Biden and Harris took office and began to unravel the progress.

Trump’s tariffs were part of a broader economic policy designed to put America first, securing jobs for American workers and ensuring that American industries weren’t being undercut by foreign competitors. Yet, Walz chose to distort the truth in a pathetic attempt to smear Trump, hoping that voters wouldn’t know the difference.

In reality, Biden and Harris have kept many of Trump’s tariffs in place and even increased some, recognizing their necessity. But instead of being honest, Walz and Harris are opting to spread falsehoods, hoping to distract from their own policy failures.

Walz’s incoherent response during the interview is emblematic of the broader Harris-Walz campaign. It’s a campaign of empty promises, half-truths, and blatant lies. They claim to care about the middle class, but their policies have only made life harder for everyday Americans. From inflation to housing prices to rising crime, the Harris-Walz ticket has shown that they are out of touch with the real needs of the American people.

It’s not just that Walz didn’t have an answer in the moment—it’s that he couldn’t have an answer, because he and Kamala Harris don’t have a plan. They can offer all the long-term proposals they want, but none of it addresses the immediate struggles families are facing under their leadership.

What we saw in that interview wasn’t just a candidate stumbling over his words—it was a candidate revealing the utter lack of vision, leadership, and competence that he and Kamala Harris bring to the table. And if this is the best they have to offer, Americans should be very concerned about what the future holds under their leadership.

As the 2024 election approaches, voters are being presented with a clear choice. On one hand, you have the Harris-Walz ticket—a duo that can’t even answer simple questions about the economy, let alone offer real solutions. On the other hand, you have candidates like Donald Trump, who not only have a track record of putting America first but also have a clear vision for how to restore the economic prosperity that has been lost under Biden and Harris.

The American people deserve leaders who understand their struggles and have the courage to take bold action to address them. Tim Walz and Kamala Harris have proven that they are not those leaders. It’s time for a change. America can’t afford four more years of empty promises and failed policies.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.