The Radical Left can pretend all they want that they care about this country and the people in it. But Americans know the truth.

And Trump’s newest election comments have exposed the horrific nature of the Left.

In a powerful display of leadership, former President Donald Trump held his first outdoor rally since the near-tragic event in Butler, Pennsylvania, where an attempt was made on his life by a gunman in July 2024.

Despite the danger he faced just weeks ago, Trump stood tall, surrounded by bulletproof glass, addressing a crowd that gathered to hear his vision for America’s future.

At the rally, Trump wasted no time addressing the latest economic scandal that has rocked the Biden-Harris administration. The administration had recently revised job growth numbers, revealing that the number of jobs added between April 2023 and March 2024 had been overstated by a staggering 818,000.

Trump didn’t mince words, calling the revision a “massive scandal” and accusing the Biden-Harris administration of “fraudulently manipulating job statistics to hide the true extent of the economic ruin that they’ve inflicted on America.”

“They wanted it to come out after the election, but somehow it got leaked,” Trump said, highlighting the administration’s desperate attempt to cover up their failures. He continued, “The Harris-Biden administration has been caught lying to the American people, and now we’re on the brink. This November, Americans are going to tell Kamala Harris that we’ve had enough, we can’t take it anymore, you’re doing a terrible job. Comrade Harris, you’re fired, get outta here.”

Kamala Harris has come under intense scrutiny for her proposed economic policies, which have been widely criticized as being destructive and out of touch with the realities of the American economy.

The internet has even coined the term “Kamunism” in response to Harris’s alarming plans, which include communist-style price controls on food and other essential services. These policies would not only stifle economic growth but would also place an unbearable burden on American families, leading to higher prices, shortages, and economic chaos.

Trump, in stark contrast, offered a clear and compelling vision for economic recovery under his second term. He promised the crowd, “We’re going to do a great job for North Carolina. We’re going to do a great job for the United States of America. We put America first, and we’re going to Make America Great Again.”

One of the most glaring failures of the Biden-Harris administration has been their mishandling of America’s energy resources.

Trump pointed out that the administration has “depleted” the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, an emergency supply meant to be used in times of national crisis—not to artificially lower gas prices for political gain.

“These reserves,” Trump said, “are not for filling up your car so that you have four cents a gallon less and that you vote for crooked Joe. It’s not meant for that.”

Trump reminded the audience of his achievements during his first term, when America became energy independent for the first time in decades. He pledged to restore that independence, ensuring that America is no longer at the mercy of foreign powers when it comes to our energy needs.

By unleashing the full potential of America’s energy sector, Trump aims to create jobs, lower energy costs, and secure the nation’s future.

Trump also addressed the issue of trade, particularly the damaging effects of unfair trade practices by countries like China. He warned that China is currently building massive auto plants in Mexico with the intention of flooding the U.S. market with cheap cars, destroying what’s left of the American auto industry.

“Right now, China is building massive auto plants in Mexico, and they think that those plants are going to make cars and they’re going to sell them across the line for no tax, no anything, destroy what’s left in Detroit,” Trump said.

To combat this, Trump vowed to impose tariffs of 150 to 200 percent on these foreign-made cars, a bold move that would protect American jobs and industries. “We’re going to use tariffs to take advantage of our great strength and frankly hurt countries that are hurting us and have been hurting us on trade for many, many years,” Trump declared.

This approach contrasts sharply with Harris’s weak stance on trade, which has allowed foreign competitors to take advantage of the U.S., costing American jobs and undermining our economy.

Trump’s rally wasn’t just about critiquing the failures of the Biden-Harris administration—it was about reminding the American people of what real leadership looks like. He pointed to his record during his first term, when he delivered the largest tax cut in history, rolled back burdensome regulations, and created millions of jobs.

“Together, we’re going to pay down debt, we’re going to reduce your taxes,” Trump promised, emphasizing his commitment to economic policies that benefit all Americans, not just the elite.

Trump also took aim at the Biden administration’s record on immigration, pointing out that “almost all” of the jobs created under Biden have gone to illegal immigrants, a stark contrast to Trump’s America First policies that prioritized American workers. Under Trump, immigration was controlled, and jobs were created for American citizens, not for those who entered the country illegally.

As the 2024 election approaches, the choice for Americans couldn’t be clearer. On one side, you have Kamala Harris, whose policies threaten to drive the country further into economic ruin, and on the other, you have Donald Trump, a proven leader with a track record of success.

Harris’s weak and destructive policies have already shown their true colors, leaving America in a worse position than when Biden and Harris took office. In contrast, Trump’s policies have always been about making America stronger, safer, and more prosperous.

This November, the American people have the opportunity to reject the failures of the Biden-Harris administration and choose a path of strength, prosperity, and true leadership.

Donald Trump is ready to once again lead the nation toward a brighter future, one where America’s best days are still ahead.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more of the truth in the news.

Tim Walz has made his fair share of mistakes. And now, it seems that Harris is trying to distance herself.

Because the Harris campaign has stabbed Tim Walz in the back after this shocking admission.

In a shocking revelation, the Harris campaign has admitted that Democratic vice presidential nominee Governor Tim Walz of Minnesota falsely claimed that he and his wife used in vitro fertilization (IVF) to conceive their children.

This deceptive claim was used to suggest that if his political opponents banned IVF, he would not have a family, a narrative designed to tug at the heartstrings of voters and vilify his conservative adversaries.

But as it turns out, Walz and his wife, Gwen, never used IVF. Instead, they used a less invasive and less expensive treatment called intrauterine insemination (IUI).

This revelation, reported by the New York Times, is not just a small misstep but a significant breach of trust. It exposes Walz’s willingness to lie to the American people to advance his political agenda, a tactic that is not only dishonest but dangerous for the future of our nation.

The American people deserve better—they deserve honesty and integrity from those seeking the highest offices in the land.

This latest scandal is far from an isolated incident. Tim Walz has a history of making false claims that raise serious questions about his character and suitability for national office. This is a man who has shown time and again that he is willing to distort the truth for political gain.

Consider his false claim that he is a “retired command sergeant major.” In reality, Walz is a retired master sergeant, a rank below command sergeant major. Despite repeatedly touting this false military background throughout his political career, he has yet to offer a credible explanation for this deception. How can the American people trust someone who lies about his military service?

Moreover, the Harris-Walz campaign has circulated a video in which Walz claimed he carried weapons “in war.” However, his military service record reveals that Walz never deployed to a combat zone or served “in war.” When confronted with this discrepancy, the campaign brushed it off as a mere “misspeak.”

This is not a minor slip of the tongue—it is a deliberate attempt to mislead voters about his military experience, a tactic that is both disrespectful to those who have served and disingenuous to the public.

The implications of Walz’s lies extend far beyond mere political theater. His false claims about IVF are particularly egregious because they exploit deeply personal issues for political gain.

By lying about his family’s fertility struggles, Walz has manipulated a sensitive topic to create a narrative that paints conservatives as heartless villains intent on denying couples the chance to have children.

This is not just misleading—it is a dangerous distortion of reality that could influence public opinion and policy in harmful ways.

The American people deserve to know the truth about their leaders, especially on issues as important as family values and reproductive rights. Walz’s willingness to deceive the public on these matters shows a profound lack of respect for the truth and a disturbing willingness to say anything to win votes. This is not the kind of leadership America needs.

In stark contrast to the Harris-Walz campaign, the Trump-Vance ticket represents a commitment to honesty, integrity, and the truth. Both Donald Trump and JD Vance have consistently stood up for the values that make America great—family, faith, and freedom.

They understand that leadership is not about spinning false narratives but about delivering real results for the American people.

JD Vance, in particular, has been a vocal critic of Walz’s deceitful tactics. After the New York Times exposed Walz’s IVF lie, Vance rightly pointed out, “Today it came out that Tim Walz had lied about having a family via IVF. Who lies about something like that?” V

ance’s response highlights the absurdity and moral bankruptcy of Walz’s actions. Vance understands that the American people deserve leaders who tell the truth, even when it’s difficult.

Trump and Vance have consistently fought for policies that protect life, support families, and promote American values. They have been clear in their opposition to the radical left’s agenda, which seeks to undermine the very foundations of our society. Their commitment to transparency and honesty stands in sharp contrast to the deceitful tactics of the Harris-Walz campaign.

The American people deserve an honest campaign, free from the lies and manipulations that have become all too common in today’s political landscape. Tim Walz’s false claims about IVF and his military service are just the latest examples of a pattern of deception that should give every voter pause. If Walz is willing to lie about something as personal as his family’s fertility journey, what else is he willing to lie about?

The stakes in this election are too high to allow dishonest politicians to deceive the public. The Harris-Walz campaign’s lies are not just a breach of trust—they are a threat to the integrity of our democracy. The American people deserve leaders who are honest, transparent, and committed to telling the truth.

In November, voters will have a clear choice between the deceitful tactics of the Harris-Walz campaign and the integrity and honesty of Trump and Vance. The choice is clear: America needs leaders who will tell the truth, even when it’s inconvenient.

It’s time to reject the lies and manipulations of Tim Walz and stand with those who value honesty and integrity in our nation’s highest offices.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

The Radical Left has been showing its true colors this week at the DNC. But this recent development has horrified millions.

And the Democrats’ sickening hypocrisy has been on full display during pro-terror events at the DNC.

In an era where the principles of justice and equality are often proclaimed loudly by the Democratic Party, their recent actions regarding pro-Israel demonstrators reveal a disturbing hypocrisy.

On Tuesday, a pro-Israel group was denied a permit to march during the Democratic National Convention (DNC) and instead gathered in a makeshift “Hostage Square” in Chicago’s West Loop to ensure their voices were heard.

The denial of this permit is not just an isolated incident; it’s a glaring example of how the Democratic Party has increasingly pandered to pro-Palestinian terror supporters while sidelining those who stand with Israel.

The term “Hostage Square” has deep significance. The original Hostage Square is located in front of an art museum in Tel Aviv, Israel, a space that became a gathering place for the families of kidnapped and missing Israelis following the Hamas terror attack on October 7.

The makeshift Hostage Square in Chicago mirrors this tragic yet resilient symbol, drawing attention to the victims of Hamas — particularly the U.S. citizens who were either murdered or taken hostage.

Among these American hostages are Keith Siegel, 65, Sagui Dekel-Chen, 35, Omer Neutra, 22, Edan Alexander, 20, and Hersh Goldberg-Polin, 23. Their plight should stir the conscience of every American, yet the Democratic leadership has shown little more than lip service in response.

The Chicago Hostage Square features art installations that are both poignant and powerful, with a particular focus on the human cost of Hamas’ barbarity. One such installation, created by Israeli designer Neil Salti, is a tree that honors the 403 victims of the Hamas attack on the Nova music festival.

Visitors to the site are encouraged to write messages or the names of victims on nearby rocks, a somber yet meaningful tribute. Salti himself lost 25 friends at Nova, many of whom were DJs or art designers for the festival. His tree includes a rope around the trunk, symbolizing the ropes found at the festival site, believed to have been used on r*pe victims.

This art, born out of unimaginable pain, serves as a testament to the resilience of the human spirit in the face of evil.

Salti’s girlfriend, Orly Birnbaum, shared a harrowing account of her friend Karla, who was burned so badly at the festival that she was only identified through dental records.

Such stories underscore the unimaginable horror faced by the victims of Hamas, a terror group whose atrocities are often minimized or ignored by certain factions within the Democratic Party.

Andrea Weinstein, the younger sister of Judih Weinstein, a resident of Kibbutz Nir Oz who was murdered along with her husband Gadi Haggai by Hamas terrorists, attended the event without knowing that her sister’s photograph would be prominently displayed.

She recounted how her sister and brother-in-law, who cherished their morning routine of espresso and a walk, were mercilessly murdered during one of these peaceful strolls.

The Democrats’ refusal to provide a platform for pro-Israel voices is emblematic of a party increasingly swayed by radical elements that view Israel with hostility.

The Democratic convention has notably downplayed the role of Jewish or pro-Israel speakers, a move that seems to be a direct response to the growing tensions within the party over the war in Gaza.

While thousands of pro-Palestinian protesters — including Hamas supporters — were permitted to march on the convention site on Monday, pro-Israel groups were systematically denied similar opportunities. This double standard is not only hypocritical but also dangerous, as it emboldens anti-Semitic sentiments within the party and the broader American left.

Vice President Kamala Harris, who is eager to appease these radical elements, has reportedly done so in secret. President Joe Biden, during his address to the convention on Monday, acknowledged the protesters’ grievances, even going so far as to say they “have a point.” Yet, in a speech that spanned several minutes, he failed to mention Israel even once.

This omission speaks volumes about the priorities of the Democratic leadership — a leadership that is increasingly willing to sacrifice its Jewish constituents on the altar of political expediency.

The contrast with the Republican Party could not be starker. The Republican Jewish Coalition has promised to plant 1,800 trees in Israel for every speaker at the Democratic convention who praises Israel.

On the convention’s first day, there were no takers. This gesture by the Republicans is more than symbolic; it’s a clear message that they stand with Israel and the Jewish people, a stance that the Democratic Party seems to have abandoned.

Amidst this political turmoil, Hostage Square in Chicago has become a refuge for pro-Israel activists, many of whom feel besieged by the overwhelming presence of pro-Palestinian groups at the convention. These groups were granted permits by the City of Chicago for their march, while pro-Israel groups were relegated to the sidelines. Even a Christian-led pro-Israel counterprotest on Monday was confined to the sidewalk, forced to march around the perimeter of a pro-Palestinian rally. This unequal treatment further highlights the disturbing bias that has taken root within the Democratic establishment.

Hostage Square is the only pro-Israel event near the convention, and the fear of anti-Semitic attacks is so high that its location was deliberately not publicized. This speaks to the dangerous rise in anti-Semitic sentiments, a trend that has been exacerbated by the Democrats’ pandering to radical elements within their base.

Unlike the original Hostage Square in Israel, which is a permanent fixture, this Chicago version will only last a day. But its impact, organizers hope, will be lasting, providing some solace to a Jewish community that has been traumatized by events in Israel, the explosion of anti-Semitism in America, and the ambivalence — if not outright hostility — of the Democratic Party and its leadership.

The hypocrisy of the Democrats in allowing pro-Palestinian terror supporters to demonstrate while denying pro-Israel voices a similar platform is not just a political issue; it’s a moral one.

The rise in anti-Semitic feelings within the Democratic Party is a clear and present danger, not just to the Jewish community, but to the very fabric of American society. The Democratic leadership must be held accountable for their actions, and the Jewish community must not be abandoned in the face of this growing threat.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Politics can be full of corrupt people. But the thought of this level of corruption at the highest levels of government is concerning.

And this Congressman shocked the country by pleading guilty to a terrible crime.

Former New York Republican Rep. George Santos has pleaded guilty to wire fraud and aggravated identity theft, according to a press release from the Department of Justice (DOJ).

This marks a significant chapter in the ongoing saga of Santos, whose political career has been marred by scandal and dishonesty.

George Santos, once a rising star within the Republican Party, has now become a cautionary tale of what happens when ambition overrides integrity.

The former congressman admitted to a litany of crimes, including filing fraudulent reports with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), embezzling funds from campaign donors, unauthorized use of credit cards, and fraudulently obtaining unemployment benefits.

These admissions come as no surprise to those who have followed his career, as his tenure in Congress was marked by deception and self-interest.

The DOJ’s press release confirmed that Santos’s crimes were not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern of fraudulent behavior. U.S. Attorney Breon Peace did not mince words in his statement: “Today, for what may seem like the first time since he started his campaign for Congress, Mr. Santos told the truth about his criminal schemes. He admitted to lying, stealing, and conning people. By pleading guilty, Mr. Santos has acknowledged that he repeatedly defrauded federal and state government institutions as well as his own family, supporters, and constituents.”

The trajectory of George Santos’s political career serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of unethical behavior in public office.

Elected to Congress in 2022, Santos quickly gained attention for his flamboyant personality and his promises to bring change to his district. However, it wasn’t long before cracks began to appear in his carefully crafted image.

In December 2023, Santos became the first member of Congress to be expelled in more than two decades after the House voted against him 311-114. The expulsion was a clear signal that even his colleagues could no longer ignore the mounting evidence of his wrongdoing.

The House Ethics Committee’s report, which preceded his expulsion, was damning. It detailed how Santos had filed fraudulent reports with the FEC and misused campaign funds for personal luxuries, including botox treatments and subscriptions to OnlyFans accounts.

Santos’s guilty plea is the culmination of months of legal wrangling and public scrutiny. Facing 23 charges, he opted to enter a plea agreement to avoid the spectacle of a trial.

This decision, while likely the best course of action given the overwhelming evidence against him, does little to mitigate the damage he has done to the public’s trust.

The former congressman’s sentencing is scheduled for February 7, 2025, where he faces a mandatory minimum sentence of two years in prison and a maximum of 22 years. Additionally, Santos has been ordered to pay restitution of $373,749.97 and forfeiture of $205,002.97.

The tale of George Santos is one of ambition gone awry, but it is also a lesson in the importance of integrity in public service.

As Americans, we must hold our leaders accountable and ensure that they are worthy of the offices they hold. Anything less is a betrayal of the trust placed in them by the American people.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

It is no secret that supporters of the Radical Left are unhappy right now. But no one thought things would escalate this far.

And now, a brutal attack at the DNC by some of their own has caused mayhem.

As the Democratic National Convention (DNC) kicked off its first night of programming in Chicago, the United Center became the epicenter of a different kind of spectacle.

Far-left agitators, some wearing keffiyehs and brandishing anti-Israel signs and flags, breached the fenced perimeter surrounding the convention site, leading to a tense standoff with law enforcement.

This brazen display of lawlessness is a stark reminder of the growing influence of radical elements within the Democratic Party and their disregard for law and order.

The agitators, emboldened by a political climate that often excuses or even endorses their behavior, broke through the initial fencing that had been set up to secure the United Center. This was no small feat; the fencing was intended to prevent exactly this kind of chaos.

Yet, the determination of these far-left radicals to disrupt the DNC was evident as they swiftly moved towards a second line of fencing, where dozens of officers were stationed.

Their actions were nothing short of an assault on the very security measures put in place to protect both the event and the city of Chicago. As the agitators attempted to tear down the interior fencing, riot police were forced to intervene, pushing back the mob as signs and other objects were hurled at them. The situation escalated quickly, leading to the arrest of four protesters. However, the chaos didn’t end there.

The actions of these agitators go beyond mere protest; they represent a direct challenge to authority and a willingness to use violence and intimidation to achieve their goals.

The agitators’ attempt to breach the interior fencing was not just a physical act of aggression; it was a symbolic gesture, signaling their intent to tear down the very foundations of law and order.

The agitators’ defiance was further demonstrated when, after the initial arrests, they immediately moved to dismantle the fencing once again, attempting to “save” their fellow protester.

This reckless behavior highlights the dangerous mindset that has taken hold among far-left radicals who view law enforcement not as protectors of public safety, but as obstacles to be overcome in their pursuit of anarchy.

Amidst the chaos, the anti-Israel sentiment displayed by the agitators added another layer of concern. The keffiyehs, anti-Israel signs, and flags present at the scene point to a troubling trend within the far-left: the merging of radical activism with anti-Semitic undertones.

This is not an isolated incident but part of a broader pattern where anti-Israel rhetoric has become increasingly common within certain factions of the Democratic Party and its base.

This incident at the DNC is a stark reminder of how the far-left’s agenda has been seeping into mainstream Democratic politics. The presence of anti-Israel symbols at a major political event should raise alarms, yet the Democratic leadership has largely remained silent on the issue, further emboldening these radicals.

As the night progressed, the Democratic Party continued with its planned programming, with President Joe Biden set to speak later in the evening. However, the silence from Democratic leaders regarding the breach of security and the actions of these far-left agitators was deafening.

This lack of condemnation from the party’s leadership is not surprising, given their reluctance to distance themselves from the radical elements that have increasingly come to define their base.

In recent years, the Democratic Party has seen a shift towards more extreme positions, often driven by pressure from the far-left. The reluctance to denounce the agitators who disrupted the DNC is indicative of the party’s broader struggle to maintain control over these radical elements. Instead of taking a firm stance against lawlessness and radicalism, the Democratic leadership seems content to appease these factions, even at the cost of public safety and order.

The events outside the United Center should serve as an example for the American public. The willingness of far-left agitators to breach security perimeters, challenge law enforcement, and promote radical agendas is not just a problem for the Democratic Party—it’s a problem for the nation as a whole.

When political discourse devolves into violent confrontations and the rule of law is disregarded, the very fabric of our society is at risk.

As we move closer to the 2024 election, it’s clear that these far-left radicals will continue to push the boundaries of acceptable behavior. The Democratic Party’s inability—or unwillingness—to rein in these elements within their ranks only serves to embolden them further. The question now is: How far will the radicals go, and what will be the consequences for our nation?

The breach of the DNC’s security perimeter by far-left agitators is more than just an isolated incident—it’s a reflection of the growing radicalism within the Democratic Party and the dangerous path that lies ahead if these elements are not confronted. The silence from Democratic leaders is troubling, as it signals a tacit acceptance of this behavior.

As Americans, we must demand strong leadership that is willing to stand up to radicalism and protect the rule of law. The events in Chicago are a reminder that the stakes are high, and the future of our nation depends on our ability to uphold the values of law and order, respect for authority, and the protection of our democratic institutions.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Radical Left loves to spread fake news. And this time, they crossed a major line.

Because Joe Biden spread horrific lies about Trump during his recent DNC speech.

President Joe Biden’s keynote address at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on Monday night marked a unique and ironic conclusion to a political career that spanned five decades.

Yet, the event was less a celebration of Biden’s achievements and more a thinly veiled effort to quietly usher him out the door while simultaneously propping up Kamala Harris as the future of the Democratic Party. The night was riddled with falsehoods, revisionist history, and a desperate attempt to rewrite the narrative of Biden’s presidency.

For months, it has been clear that Democrats were uneasy about Biden’s prospects for 2024. His dismal performance in the June 27th debate against President Donald Trump only solidified their fears. The same party that once heralded Biden as a savior has since been quietly working behind the scenes to push him off the ticket.

Monday night’s convention was the culmination of these efforts, with speaker after speaker looking past Biden and proclaiming Kamala Harris as the new leader of the Democratic Party.

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, who refused to condemn the Democratic Party’s attempts to force Biden out, encapsulated the party’s betrayal. Despite millions of Americans voting for Biden in 2020, the Democrats have chosen to disregard their voices in favor of a handpicked successor.

This is not the action of a party that values democracy; it is the behavior of a party that seeks to consolidate power at any cost.

Biden’s speech was filled with the kind of falsehoods and exaggerations that have become all too common during his presidency. As he spoke, it became clear that the Democrats were more interested in painting a rosy picture of the past four years than in confronting the harsh realities of Biden’s failed policies.

Biden claimed that his administration had presided over “one of the most extraordinary four years of progress ever, period.” He cited supposed achievements like the addition of 16 million jobs, record small business growth, and a thriving stock market. But the reality on the ground tells a different story.

The so-called economic recovery has been uneven at best, with inflation eroding the purchasing power of working Americans and the stock market experiencing volatility that has left many retirees in a precarious position.

Perhaps the most egregious of Biden’s claims was that “wages are up, inflation is down, way down,” and that the wealth gap has narrowed. In truth, inflation remains a significant concern for most Americans, with prices for essentials like food and gas still far higher than they were before Biden took office. The wealth gap has only widened under his administration, as his policies have disproportionately harmed the middle class while benefiting the wealthiest Americans.

Biden also falsely claimed that “we finally beat Big Pharma,” despite the fact that his administration has done little to rein in the exorbitant costs of prescription drugs. This is yet another example of the empty promises that have characterized his time in office.

In one of the most ironic moments of the night, Biden declared that “democracy has prevailed” and “delivered,” even as the Democratic Party was actively ignoring the will of the voters by pushing him aside in favor of Kamala Harris. The hypocrisy was palpable. The Democrats claim to champion democracy, yet they are more than willing to subvert it when it suits their purposes.

Biden’s assertion that “there is no place in America for political violence” was a direct reference to the events of January 6th, 2021, but it conveniently ignored the political violence that has erupted in cities across America under his watch.

From Portland to Kenosha, Democrat-led cities have been plagued by riots and unrest, yet Biden and his party have done little to address the root causes of this violence.

The most glaring irony, however, was Biden’s insistence that “democracy has prevailed” even as Kamala Harris, a vice president who was not elected by the people, is now being positioned as the next president.

Harris was chosen by Biden as his running mate in 2020, not by the voters. Now, as Biden steps aside, the Democratic Party is effectively appointing her as the future leader of the nation without giving the American people a say in the matter. This is not democracy; it is the antithesis of it.

As expected, Biden took several jabs at President Trump during his speech, but these attacks were largely baseless and served only to highlight Biden’s desperation. Biden called Trump a “loser” and accused him of spreading a “message around the world” that America is a failing nation. But the truth is that under Biden’s leadership, America has become weaker on the global stage, with adversaries like China and Russia growing bolder by the day.

Biden’s claim that violent crime has dropped to “the lowest level in more than 50 years” is patently false. In reality, violent crime has surged in many parts of the country, particularly in cities governed by Democrats.

Biden’s assertion that the murder rate is “falling faster than any time in history” is equally dubious, as crime data from across the country tells a different story.

Biden also attempted to pin the blame for the ongoing border crisis on Trump, claiming that Trump “killed the strongest bipartisan border deal in the history of the United States.” This is a blatant distortion of the facts.

The truth is that Biden’s own policies have exacerbated the crisis at the southern border, leading to record-high numbers of illegal immigrants crossing into the country. His belated executive action on the border is too little, too late, and does nothing to address the root causes of the crisis.

The Democratic National Convention was a masterclass in hypocrisy. The same party that once lauded Biden as the savior of the nation is now discarding him in favor of Kamala Harris, all while claiming that democracy has prevailed. The irony is lost on no one, and it serves as a stark reminder of the Democrats’ true priorities: power and control.

As Biden took his final bow, it was clear that his speech was less a celebration of his presidency and more a desperate attempt to rewrite history. The Democrats may have succeeded in pushing Biden out, but they cannot erase the failures of his administration.

The American people are not fooled by the falsehoods and fearmongering that have become the hallmark of the Biden presidency.

The 2024 election will be a referendum on the Democrats’ failed policies and their disregard for the will of the people. As the American people look ahead to the next chapter in our nation’s history, they must ask themselves whether they want to continue down the path of failed leadership and hypocrisy, or whether they are ready to return to the strong, principled leadership that President Trump represents.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Leftist media is lying to the American people. And you wouldn’t believe what’s really going on.

And now, a CBS poll has shown the stunning truth about the 2024 election race.

A recent CBS News poll has uncovered a reality that Democrats are likely dreading as they look toward the 2024 presidential election: former President Donald Trump holds a commanding lead over Vice President Kamala Harris on crucial issues such as the economy, immigration, and inflation.

For conservatives, this is no surprise. The American people are seeing what decades of Democratic mismanagement have led to, and they’re ready for a return to Trump’s America-first policies.

The CBS News poll surveyed 3,258 likely voters between August 14 and 16, and the results should have the Democratic establishment on edge. According to the poll, 83 percent of voters identified the economy as a major factor in their voting decisions.

Another 76 percent highlighted inflation, 74 percent pointed to the state of democracy, 62 percent cited crime, and 56 percent marked the U.S.-Mexico border as a key issue.

Among voters who prioritize the economy, inflation, and immigration, Trump leads Harris by a staggering margin. On the economy, Trump has a 56 percent to 43 percent lead over Harris. When it comes to inflation, his advantage expands even further, with a 61 percent to 38 percent lead.

But the most glaring difference comes on the issue of immigration and the border, where Trump dominates Harris 76 percent to 24 percent. These are the core concerns of everyday Americans, and Trump’s track record speaks for itself.

During his administration, America enjoyed unprecedented economic growth, record-low unemployment, and wages were rising for all workers. Trump renegotiated trade deals to put America first and secured our southern border, reducing illegal immigration dramatically. Meanwhile, under the Biden-Harris administration, we’ve seen rampant inflation, skyrocketing food and energy prices, and a border crisis spiraling out of control.

Harris, on the other hand, is burdened by her association with the disastrous Biden administration. The CBS poll revealed that 64 percent of voters view Harris’s policies as “mostly the same” as those of President Biden, with 19 percent saying they are “entirely the same.” That’s bad news for Harris, who, despite Biden’s tanking approval ratings, has been unable to carve out any identity of her own.

Voters know what they’re getting with Harris, and it’s more of the same: more inflation, more reckless spending, more open borders, and more weakness on the world stage. Trump’s America was one of strength, security, and economic prosperity, while Biden and Harris have ushered in an era of uncertainty, chaos, and decline. Even on something as basic as border security, the poll shows that 48 percent of voters expect more border crossings if Harris were to win in 2024, while only 8 percent believe the problem would worsen under Trump.

In fact, a resounding 72 percent of voters believe border crossings would decrease with Trump back in the Oval Office.

The economy remains the most critical issue for American voters, and Trump’s policies clearly resonate. When Trump was president, he slashed taxes, reduced burdensome regulations, and revitalized American manufacturing.

His America-first trade policies and tax cuts for middle-class families fueled a boom that lifted millions of Americans out of poverty and into financial security.

Compare that to the Biden-Harris approach, which has been nothing short of catastrophic. Inflation, driven by reckless government spending and policies hostile to energy independence, has hit families where it hurts most—at the grocery store, the gas pump, and in their paychecks.

According to the CBS poll, 48 percent of voters believe that food and grocery prices will rise even higher if Harris is elected, compared to 37 percent who think prices would climb under Trump.

The message is clear: voters trust Trump to fix the economic mess created by Biden and Harris. They know he’s a businessman who knows how to get things done. In contrast, Harris’s policies, which are just a continuation of Biden’s disastrous economic agenda, have been an utter failure.

Immigration and the crisis at the southern border have been defining issues throughout both the Trump and Biden administrations. Trump’s strong stance on border security, including building the wall and enforcing strict immigration laws, kept the border under control. Meanwhile, under Harris and Biden, illegal crossings have skyrocketed, cartels are thriving, and fentanyl is pouring into American communities.

The poll’s numbers on immigration are perhaps the most damning for Harris. A staggering 76 percent of voters who care about immigration favor Trump over Harris. Why? Because Trump has a proven track record of securing the border. Voters know Trump means business when he says he’ll protect American sovereignty and put an end to the disastrous “open borders” policy of the Biden-Harris administration.

While Trump dominates Harris on the economy, immigration, and inflation, the poll does show that Harris holds an edge over Trump on issues such as race and diversity, abortion, and the state of democracy. But that’s not where the average American is focused.

The CBS poll reveals that a majority of voters—86 percent—believe they know what Trump stands for. In contrast, only 64 percent can say the same about Harris.

Harris has spent most of her vice presidency evading responsibility, offering up word salads instead of concrete policy solutions, and clinging to the far-left ideology of the Democratic Party. Voters are starting to notice that Harris, like Biden, is out of touch with the real concerns of working-class Americans.

Despite the overwhelming lead Trump holds on the most important issues, the poll shows that Harris holds a narrow 3-point lead over Trump nationally, and the two are tied in battleground states. However, these numbers should be taken with a grain of salt.

Trump’s base is strong, and the enthusiasm for his return to office is undeniable. In contrast, Harris struggles with a lack of identity and low approval ratings. Even among Democrats, she has failed to inspire the kind of energy and passion that Trump does on the Republican side.

As we inch closer to the 2024 election, it’s clear that the American people are craving a return to strong leadership, economic prosperity, and secure borders—everything Trump’s presidency delivered and everything Harris’s would fail to achieve.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more of the TRUTH in the news.

It is no secret now that the Radical Left loves terrorists. But they have taken things to the extreme.

And the Chicago Mayor’s stunning pro-terror protest comments have revealed the Democrats’ plan.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is making headlines for his nonchalant attitude regarding the massive pro-Palestinian protests planned for the Democratic National Convention (DNC) this week.

In an interview with ABC’s Martha Raddatz, Johnson claimed that he’s “not worried” about the demonstrations overshadowing the convention, Kamala Harris, or her potential rise as the Democratic Party’s standard-bearer in the 2024 election.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is asked if he has seen evidence there will be fewer protesters at the DNC now that Biden is no longer the nominee:

"You certainly know that there's tremendous excitement." pic.twitter.com/RrkajreQbR

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) August 18, 2024

However, Johnson’s dismissiveness is emblematic of the Democratic Party’s larger issues—failing leadership, internal discord, and a blatant disregard for the true concerns of American citizens.

Mayor Johnson’s assurance that Democrats “can handle” the protests because it’s a “privilege” to hear grievances reveals just how out of touch the Democratic establishment has become. What Johnson fails to acknowledge is that these protests aren’t just a minor inconvenience—they are a glaring symptom of a fractured party, divided between its radical fringe and an out-of-touch establishment.

The protests began Sunday night with demonstrators vowing to “bring the war home,” a dangerous escalation of rhetoric that should concern any responsible leader. Rather than addressing the legitimate safety concerns, Johnson seems more focused on the city’s reputation for hosting conventions.

It’s laughable that he would boast about Chicago’s “experience” in hosting conventions, as if this alone will magically resolve the deep political unrest festering within the Democratic Party.

With the Chicago Police Department operating with 1,700 fewer officers than just five years ago, and crime skyrocketing under his leadership, Johnson’s assurance that safety will be paramount is hard to take seriously.

The reality is that Chicago has become a symbol of Democratic failure—rampant crime, ineffective governance, and now, massive protests that threaten to overshadow the party’s marquee event.

Adding fuel to the fire, the protesters are not just targeting President Biden, but also Vice President Kamala Harris. Harris, who has tried to distance herself from the Biden administration’s disastrous legacy, is now facing the same backlash as the President.

The notion that Harris, who has been Biden’s closest political ally for nearly four years, can somehow escape the tarnish of this administration is absurd.

Harris has been notably absent when it comes to addressing real issues facing the American people. From her failures as “border czar” to her tone-deaf speeches on economic recovery, Harris has done little to instill confidence in her leadership abilities.

Yet, Mayor Johnson could hardly contain his enthusiasm, claiming there’s “tremendous excitement” around her campaign stops.

But who is truly excited? Certainly not the American people, who continue to suffer under crushing inflation, out-of-control gas prices, and a border crisis that the Democrats have been utterly incompetent in addressing.

Johnson’s failure to address the growing discontent within his own party is part of a larger issue facing Democrats. The pro-Palestinian protests are a manifestation of the ideological tug-of-war within the Democratic Party. On one side, you have the radical left, pushing anti-Israel rhetoric, and on the other, the more traditional wing of the party struggling to keep control. This infighting only serves to highlight the Democrats’ inability to govern effectively.

Instead of dealing with these fractures, Johnson and the party’s leaders, like Harris, prefer to focus on virtue-signaling and empty platitudes about “First Amendment rights” and “the privilege” of hearing grievances.

While free speech is undoubtedly a cornerstone of American democracy, there is a growing sense that the Democratic Party is more concerned with catering to fringe, activist groups than addressing the real concerns of ordinary Americans—such as economic instability, national security, and rising crime.

Kamala Harris, as the Democratic Party’s potential 2024 nominee, represents a continuation of failed policies and poor leadership. From her inability to address the southern border crisis to her disastrous handling of economic recovery initiatives, Harris has demonstrated time and again that she is simply not equipped to lead the country.

Even Democrats appear to be losing faith in her ability to handle the complexities of governance.

As for Mayor Johnson, his comments highlight the broader issues with Democratic leadership in cities like Chicago. Under his watch, crime has surged, the police force has been weakened, and the city’s reputation continues to decline.

Yet, instead of addressing these critical issues head-on, Johnson is more concerned with downplaying the significance of the protests and celebrating Chicago’s convention-hosting abilities.

His comments comparing the Republican Party to “breakdancing at the Olympics” might have been meant as a humorous jab, but they only reveal how unserious the Democrats have become.

While the Republican Party focuses on restoring economic stability, securing the border, and protecting American values, Democrats like Johnson and Harris are more interested in pandering to radical activists and deflecting blame for their failures.

In contrast, the Republican Party, with leaders like Donald Trump, has consistently put the American people first. Trump’s America First agenda focused on creating jobs, securing the border, and strengthening the economy. Unlike Harris and her Democratic colleagues, Trump faced challenges head-on and delivered results.

While Democrats are busy navigating protests and internal chaos, the Republican Party is focused on the issues that truly matter to American families—reducing inflation, restoring law and order, and ensuring that the United States remains a global leader.

As the Democrats continue to crumble under the weight of their own failures, the GOP stands ready to provide the strong, decisive leadership the country desperately needs.

As the Democratic National Convention unfolds in Chicago, it’s clear that the party is in disarray. Mayor Brandon Johnson’s blasé attitude toward the protests only underscores the larger problem—Democrats are more concerned with placating their radical base than addressing the issues facing the American people.

Kamala Harris, touted as the party’s future, is no more capable of leading than Biden, and the protests surrounding her only highlight the deep divisions within the Democratic Party.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Kamala Harris is a disgrace, and her campaign has been a joke. But things just took a shocking turn.

Because Harris just exposed herself when approached by a reporter on a recent campaign trip.

On Sunday, Kamala Harris toured western Pennsylvania on her campaign bus, giving staged smiles and photo-ops while she searched for Doritos at a Sheetz. During the tour, she briefly entertained a few press questions, providing another glimpse into her ill-fated fiscal plans for America—plans that would further cripple an already fragile economy.

Her stop served as yet another example of just how out of touch she is with the reality of what Americans are facing.

In an attempt to justify her latest economic policies, Harris stammered through a bizarre and incoherent answer that exposed her lack of understanding of basic economics.

When asked by a reporter how she planned to pay for her proposed initiatives, which include fixing prices for goods, federally regulating housing, and spending trillions on social programs, Harris gave a nonsensical response about children. Yes, children. As if that alone could explain away the $1.7 trillion her proposals would add to the national debt.

It's a "return on investment" guys, nothing to worry about. Kamala says that $1.7 trillion plan "pays for itself."

pic.twitter.com/hAWmNndTUw

— Libby Emmons (@libbyemmons) August 19, 2024

It’s no surprise that Harris would attempt to change the narrative around her economic policies by invoking children. After all, her record is abysmal when it comes to actually supporting them.

In 2017, she voted against President Trump’s child tax credit expansion, a move that would have provided immediate relief to millions of American families. Yet now, conveniently after Trump and Senator JD Vance have vowed to bring back that popular policy, Harris has suddenly had a change of heart. Now, she’s promising to extend the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and reintroduce a $6,000 child tax credit for a child’s first year of life.

While she boasts that the “return on investment” from these tax credits will somehow magically pay for itself, the reality is far less rosy. What Harris fails to mention is that every dollar the government spends on these programs comes from somewhere—either increased taxes or more borrowing.

The federal government cannot continue to print money to fund giveaways without dire consequences, such as higher inflation and the eventual collapse of the dollar.

Harris loves to point out that under the first year of the Biden-Harris administration, child poverty was reduced by 50 percent, but she conveniently leaves out the context. That brief reduction was the result of massive government handouts, which created dependency rather than opportunity.

Now, she’s doubling down on that same failed strategy, claiming that the child tax credit and EITC are a panacea for all economic woes. But what happens after that first year? Harris has no answer for that, just more pie-in-the-sky rhetoric.

Perhaps the most jaw-dropping element of Harris’s economic fantasyland is her plan to build 3 million new homes during her first 100 days in office. That’s right, she believes that in just over three months, the federal government can crank out millions of homes, all while providing $25,000 in downpayment assistance to first-time buyers. Harris glosses over the logistics of this plan, and of course, she can’t explain where the money is going to come from to fund it.

In her mind, it’s all justified because, as she said, “When we increase homeownership in America, what that means in terms of increasing the tax base, not to mention property tax base, what that does to fund schools, again: return on investment.”

This kind of vague rhetoric is typical of Harris, who throws around buzzwords like “return on investment” without understanding the real economic consequences of her policies.

But let’s be clear: there is no magical “return on investment” here. Building 3 million homes out of thin air is a logistical and fiscal nightmare. It would require billions, if not trillions, of dollars in taxpayer money.

And what’s worse, artificially boosting homeownership through government subsidies only creates a housing bubble, just as we saw in the 2008 financial crisis. When that bubble bursts, it will be ordinary Americans—not Harris and her elite cronies—who are left to pick up the pieces.

Harris’s plan to increase corporate taxes is yet another example of her economic ignorance. Under President Trump, corporate taxes were cut, unleashing a wave of investment and job creation that benefited millions of Americans. But Harris wants to undo all that progress by hiking taxes on businesses, falsely believing that corporations will simply absorb the costs.

In reality, these increased taxes will either be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices or result in layoffs and reduced hiring. Companies are not charities—they exist to make a profit. When the government imposes punitive taxes, it stifles innovation, kills jobs, and drives investment overseas.

Her claim that taxing the wealthy will fund her plans is equally naive. The rich are not a bottomless pit of money to be plundered. High earners often have the means to shelter their wealth or simply move it abroad. Harris’s tax hikes will only shrink the economy further, leaving middle-class Americans to bear the brunt of the costs.

Even liberal economists like Jason Furman, who served under the Obama administration, are sounding the alarm. Furman has warned that Harris’s policies could lead to “bigger shortages, less supply, and ultimately risk higher prices and worse outcomes for consumers.” Yet Harris presses on, convinced that her reckless spending and tax plans will somehow “pay for themselves.”

Kamala Harris’s fiscal policies are a train wreck waiting to happen. Her $1.7 trillion spending spree, coupled with her incoherent answers about how to pay for it all, demonstrates just how unqualified she is to lead this country.

If allowed to implement these disastrous plans, Harris will take an already struggling economy and drive it further into the ground.

America cannot afford more of the same reckless spending and misguided policies that have already led to inflation, rising interest rates, and shrinking paychecks. Kamala Harris may talk a good game about “return on investment,” but the only thing her presidency would guarantee is more debt, fewer jobs, and a lower standard of living for all Americans.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

For years now, many Americans have been arguing that DEI is more harmful than good. But the Radical Left has been pushing it nonetheless.

But now, a massive new discovery has proven that DEI had a hand to play in the attempt on Trump’s life.

The Secret Service (USSS) has long stood as a vanguard of security, ensuring that America’s leaders are protected against any threats—domestic or foreign.

Yet, recent troubling developments raise serious questions about the competence of the agency under progressive influences.

It has been revealed that during the assassination attempt on Trump, a female Secret Service agent reportedly abandoned her post to breastfeed her baby.

This is not just an isolated occurrence but a symptom of a deeper problem. It highlights how the Left’s radical policies, particularly Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, are undermining national security at the highest levels.

According to Real Clear Politics reporter Susan Crabtree, the agent in question did not inform her superiors before leaving her post to breastfeed in a room meant for critical Secret Service operations. This breach of protocol isn’t just a procedural lapse; it’s a potential risk to national security.

The Secret Service is tasked with protecting high-profile figures such as Trump, especially during his campaign rallies. Any deviation from this responsibility can open dangerous vulnerabilities—and that’s precisely what happened here.

The agent’s actions occurred as the Secret Service was preparing for Trump’s motorcade, conducting final sweeps to ensure the safety of the event. What they found was deeply troubling: a female agent in a secure room breastfeeding her child, with two additional family members present—none of whom had the required security clearance to be in that area. This security breach, facilitated by event staff bypassing proper protocols, could have ended in catastrophe.

This lapse cannot be seen as a mere personal decision. It speaks to the larger issue of radical DEI initiatives infiltrating government institutions like the Secret Service. These policies, which emphasize “equity” over merit, and “diversity” over duty, may well be influencing the prioritization of personal needs over national security.

The fact that an agent on duty felt it was acceptable to bring her child, and unauthorized family members, into a secure zone during a crucial assignment suggests a breakdown in professional standards.

It should be noted that while women in the workforce, including mothers, should absolutely be accommodated in appropriate ways, the question here is about timing and the role of responsibility.

A Secret Service agent on duty has one job: protecting the President or other dignitaries. This is not a role where distractions or deviations from the mission can be tolerated, as they could mean the difference between life and death.

The Left’s relentless push for DEI and so-called “work-life balance” in even the most sensitive areas of government could be compromising that singular focus.

This recent incident isn’t happening in isolation. The Secret Service has come under increasing scrutiny for its security failures, including during Trump’s rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, which led to an assassination attempt on the now-Republican nominee.

This pattern of lapses is raising serious concerns about whether the agency has been compromised by progressive values that prioritize identity politics over professional duty.

Kim Cheatle, the former director of the Secret Service, resigned shortly after the assassination attempt on Trump, leaving questions about how deep the rot goes within the agency. Under Cheatle’s leadership, it seems that security took a backseat to DEI priorities.

The Left’s constant push for gender diversity and equitable representation in federal agencies has had serious consequences, and this latest incident further underscores that problem. When decisions about personnel are driven by political agendas rather than competence, we risk compromising the very fabric of our national security.

The push for diversity in federal agencies, including the USSS, means that standards are being relaxed to meet quotas. For roles as critical as Secret Service agents, there should be no compromise when it comes to experience, physical readiness, and above all, commitment to the mission. However, DEI policies, driven by progressive ideology, have created an environment where performance and security are taking a back seat to identity-based hiring practices.

It is deeply concerning that, at a time when political tensions are higher than ever, radical left-wing policies are seeping into even the most critical security roles in the country. The safety of a former president, and now presidential candidate, should never be in question due to personal distractions.

Yet, the priorities of the Left, from forcing gender parity to promoting identity politics, have clearly filtered down into institutions like the USSS, where it has no place.

DEI has morphed into an ideological straightjacket, where even life-and-death roles are being shaped by progressive whims. In the wake of this incident, many Americans are asking: are radical policies from the Left placing our national leaders at greater risk?

President Trump has been vocal in his criticism of the Left’s infiltration into every part of American life, including its most trusted institutions. This latest event proves that Trump was right to sound the alarm.

As his campaign rallies gather momentum heading into 2024, it is critical that the Secret Service refocus on its core mission—protecting its principal—not catering to politically correct ideologies that detract from their responsibilities.

The Secret Service spokesperson, Anthony Guglielmi, downplayed the North Carolina event, saying there was “no impact” on the rally. Yet, any security lapse is a potential disaster in the making.

Even if nothing happened this time, we cannot ignore the fact that a breach occurred—a breach that could have endangered President Trump’s life. This incident must be thoroughly investigated, not only for the lapse in security but also to examine how radical DEI policies have infiltrated even the most vital national security functions.

When it comes to protecting the leader of the free world, there can be no room for errors—especially not those driven by ideological imperatives that weaken the focus of the agents tasked with defending our country’s most important figures.

It is time for a comprehensive review of the impact of progressive DEI policies on the Secret Service and other agencies responsible for national security. The safety of the President should never be compromised for the sake of political correctness.

As the investigation unfolds, one thing remains clear: we cannot allow the priorities of the radical Left to continue endangering the lives of our leaders. It’s time to reestablish accountability, competency, and professionalism in our federal institutions—before it’s too late.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Ever since America learned the truth about Kamala Harris’s VP pick, there has been major controversy. Because Tim Walz is a pathological liar.

And the newest stolen valor claims are so bad that Tim Walz’s campaign might be over.

In a powerful address delivered at a Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) post in Pennsylvania, Republican vice presidential nominee and Marine veteran Senator JD Vance (R-OH) leveled a devastating critique of Democrat vice presidential nominee Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, revealing serious inconsistencies in Walz’s claims about his military service.

The fallout from these revelations has infuriated millions of veterans and Americans who see the dishonesty as a disqualifying character flaw, unfit for leadership in the highest office of the land.

Vance, speaking in front of a crowd of veterans and their families, didn’t hold back in his sharp condemnation of Walz’s false statements. “We’re not attacking his honorable service. We’re attacking the dishonesty about that service. That is not honorable. That is the height of dishonor, and Tim Walz should not be the vice president of the United States because of it,” Vance declared.

Governor Tim Walz served 24 years as a reservist in the Army National Guard, an accomplishment in and of itself. However, it’s not Walz’s service that’s under scrutiny—it’s the misleading and dishonest claims he’s made about that service. Walz has repeatedly claimed he retired as a “command sergeant major,” an E-9 rank, when in reality, he retired as a sergeant major, an E-8 rank.

While he was provisionally promoted to command sergeant major, he did not meet the requirements to officially retire at that rank.

Moreover, Walz has implied he was “in war,” despite never deploying in combat. He has referred to himself as a veteran of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), which gives the impression that he served in Afghanistan. Yet, Walz never set foot in the combat zones of Afghanistan, spending his time in Europe instead.

Perhaps most damning, Walz retired from the Army National Guard after learning his unit was being deployed to Iraq. At the time, he was responsible for over 100 soldiers as their command sergeant major. Instead of leading them into combat, Walz chose to retire early and run for Congress.

These glaring inconsistencies have not gone unnoticed by the public, particularly by veterans who feel betrayed. “Tim Walz said that he carried a weapon in war. He never went to war. Tim Walz said that he didn’t know his unit was about to deploy to Iraq when even his own press release at the time said that he knew exactly that,” Vance pointed out.

Veterans who have sacrificed everything for this nation are particularly sensitive to any politician who attempts to embellish or distort their military record, and in Walz’s case, the outrage has been palpable.

In typical fashion, the Left and the Harris-Walz campaign have tried to brush off these serious allegations, claiming Walz simply “misspoke” when he said he carried a weapon “in war.” Yet, they have not addressed any of the other falsehoods Walz has made about his service. Instead, they’ve turned their attack on Vance, accusing him of undermining Walz’s military service.

This attempt to deflect from the real issue—a candidate’s honesty and integrity—has left many Americans frustrated and angry. Vance put it succinctly, saying, “Tim Walz claimed to be a command sergeant major, even had it printed on his challenge coins, and he knew he never achieved that rank. And, now, Kamala Harris, showing terrible judgment, has decided that her way out of this political problem is to claim that she and Tim Walz are the victims.”

The Left’s response has been to portray Harris and Walz as victims of political smears, but the real victims, as Vance aptly pointed out, are the veterans whose service is being tarnished by Walz’s fabrications. For many veterans, the insult runs deep.

They see Walz’s lies as a direct slap in the face to those who’ve served honorably, without embellishing their records. Veterans have sacrificed time, health, and in many cases, their lives for this country. To have someone like Tim Walz make false claims about his own service is seen as deeply dishonorable.

The outrage surrounding Walz’s lies isn’t just limited to veterans; millions of Americans are also disgusted by his deceit. As Vance made clear, the issue at hand is not about diminishing Walz’s actual service but about confronting his dishonesty. “This is about disparaging the dishonesty and asking Kamala Harris, ‘Why are you showing such poor judgment by standing by a guy who insulted our veterans and lied about his service?'” Vance asked pointedly.

The Harris-Walz campaign’s decision to gloss over these issues is emblematic of a larger problem within the Democratic Party. There’s a pervasive sense that they can avoid accountability by redirecting the conversation, focusing on personal attacks or playing the victim card. But this strategy is wearing thin.

The American people, and particularly veterans, are tired of the dishonesty and the evasion of responsibility. They want leaders who will stand by their principles and who can be trusted to tell the truth, even when it’s difficult.

Veterans and their families have expressed their dismay over Walz’s lies and the subsequent cover-up. For those who’ve worn the uniform, integrity and honor are not negotiable. By lying about his service and then attempting to downplay those lies, Walz has alienated an important segment of the electorate.

As Vance stood surrounded by veterans, including those who’ve made the ultimate sacrifices for their country, he drove home a point that resonated with every person in the room: “Every single person standing with me has sacrificed something for this country. Some of us, like Brian, have sacrificed more than most Americans can possibly fathom,” Vance said, referring to a veteran beside him. “But every single one of us honors every veteran for their service whether they went to war or not. So long as you did what this country asked you to do, you deserve to be praised for it.”

Tim Walz’s repeated lies about his military service have become a major issue in this election, and rightly so. They speak to a broader problem of character, integrity, and the lengths to which politicians on the Left will go to deceive the public. The Harris-Walz campaign can continue to try and sweep these issues under the rug, but the American people—especially veterans—are not so easily fooled.

In this crucial election, millions of Americans are waking up to the truth: Tim Walz is not fit to be vice president, and Kamala Harris’s decision to stand by him only underscores her poor judgment. The veterans and everyday Americans who value honesty and integrity will not stand for this kind of deception. And come election day, they will make their voices heard.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.