Musk has been at Trump’s side for months. But now there’s a rift.

And Elon Musk broke with Trump on a major issue that changes everything.

Musk Slams Trump’s Spending Bill as Deficit Balloons

Elon Musk, appointed by President Trump to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), sharply criticized a sprawling spending bill for undermining his team’s efforts to slash federal waste. In a CBS interview, Musk expressed his frustration, saying, “I was like disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit … and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing.”

His remarks highlight a growing rift within the GOP over fiscal discipline, as the bill’s massive additions to the national debt clash with DOGE’s mission to streamline government operations.

Musk also questioned the bill’s characterization, adding, “I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful. I don’t know if it can be both.”

This critique echoes the concerns of fiscal hawks like Sens. Ron Johnson and Rand Paul, who have slammed the bill’s spending levels as it faces Senate scrutiny. The House, led by Speaker Mike Johnson, passed the measure despite warnings that its minimal cuts fail to offset the trillions it will pile onto the national debt.

DOGE’s Mission Faces Political Headwinds

Musk’s role at DOGE, tasked with eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse, has thrust him into a contentious political arena, amplifying his status as a divisive figure.

His $250 million donation to Trump’s 2024 campaign has drawn sharp Democratic pushback, complicating his efficiency efforts and impacting Tesla, which saw declining sales despite his popularity among conservatives.

The spending bill’s extravagance, coupled with resistance from entrenched bureaucrats, frustrates Musk’s vision for a leaner government, exposing the challenges of translating his business acumen into political reform.

Adding to his woes, Musk suffered a high-profile defeat in a Wisconsin Supreme Court race, where Democrats framed the contest as a referendum on the world’s richest man. This setback underscores the political risks of his deep involvement in GOP initiatives, as his high-profile role at DOGE makes him a lightning rod for criticism.

The interplay between his DOGE mission and these political realities highlights the uphill battle he faces in reshaping federal governance.

Musk Signals Retreat from Political Arena

At the recent Qatar Economic Forum, Musk indicated a step back from his intense political engagement, stating, “I think I’ve done enough.” His decision to “do a lot less” in political spending follows the Wisconsin loss and ongoing frustrations with the DOGE initiative’s slow progress against bureaucratic resistance.

This shift raises questions about his future influence within Trump’s administration, as he appears to recalibrate his focus amid mounting challenges.

As the Senate debates the spending bill, Musk’s vocal disapproval underscores a broader GOP struggle to balance fiscal responsibility with political realities.

His reduced political involvement could weaken the push for efficiency reforms, leaving fiscal conservatives to confront the deficit without his full support.

The evolving dynamic suggests Musk’s high-stakes foray into politics may be cooling, potentially reshaping his role in Trump’s agenda and the broader fight against government waste.

The Bidens aren’t out of the woods yet. And this could mean jail time.

Now Hunter Biden is shaking in fear over a massive FBI investigation.

FBI Reopens Probe into White House Cocaine Incident

The FBI is revisiting the mysterious discovery of cocaine in the Biden administration’s White House in 2023, according to Deputy Director Dan Bongino.

In a recent X post, Bongino announced, “Shortly after swearing in, the Director and I evaluated a number of cases of potential public corruption that, understandably, have garnered public interest.

We made the decision to either re-open, or push additional resources and investigative attention, to these cases.”

He listed the White House cocaine case alongside the DC pipe bombing and the Supreme Court Dobbs leak as priorities, adding, “I receive requested briefings on these cases weekly and we are making progress. If you have any investigative tips on these matters that may assist us, then please contact the FBI.”

The renewed scrutiny raises questions about the Biden administration’s oversight, with the unresolved case fueling speculation and casting a shadow over its credibility.

Trump Points Finger at Biden Family

Earlier this year, President Donald Trump reignited controversy by suggesting that either former President Joe Biden or his son, Hunter, was responsible for the cocaine found at the White House. In an interview with The Spectator’s Ben Domenech, who asked, “So … who actually left the cocaine in the White House?” Trump replied, “Well, either Joe or Hunter. Could be Joe, too.”

The cocaine was discovered on July 2, 2023, in a storage locker near the West Wing entrance.

Trump further criticized the investigation, stating, “That was such a terrible thing because, you know, those bins are very loaded up with … they’re not clean, and they have hundreds and even thousands of fingerprints. And when they went to look at it, it was absolutely stone cold, wiped dry. You know that, right?” His comments amplify doubts about the initial probe’s thoroughness, pointing to potential lapses under Biden’s watch.

Investigation Stalled, Questions Linger

The Secret Service’s 2023 investigation into the cocaine discovery yielded no definitive answers.

According to their statement, “On July 12, the Secret Service received the FBI’s laboratory results, which did not develop latent fingerprints and insufficient DNA was present for investigative comparisons. Therefore, the Secret Service is not able to compare evidence against the known pool of individuals. The FBI’s evaluation of the substance also confirmed that it was cocaine.”

At the time, the Biden family, including Joe and Hunter, was at Camp David, not the White House.

Hunter Biden’s well-documented struggles with substance abuse, detailed in his 2021 memoir “Beautiful Things” where he described an hourly need for crack cocaine, have fueled speculation, though he testified in federal court in 2023 that he has been sober since 2019.

The FBI’s decision to reopen the case suggests lingering concerns about accountability, with the Biden administration’s failure to resolve the incident leaving room for ongoing public skepticism.

The Left is falling apart. And plenty in the leadership are jumping ship while they can.

Now this Democrat Senator lit up his own party in a shocking act of betrayal.

Bennet Slams Democratic Party’s Tarnished Reputation

Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., didn’t hold back his frustration with the Democratic Party on Sunday, blasting its crumbling national image after losing to President Donald Trump in two consecutive elections.

In a candid interview with CNN host Jake Tapper, Bennet declared, “I don’t think nationally, the Democratic brand helps very much anywhere. If it did, we wouldn’t have lost to Donald Trump twice.”

His sharp critique reflects a party grappling with its own failures, as its damaged reputation now threatens to drag down even its most loyal figures, including Bennet himself.

Bennet’s exasperation extended to the party’s base, as he acknowledged the anger among his supporters.

“I know a lot of supporters of mine and friends of mine are furious at Donald Trump. I am… Furious at people they think aren’t standing up enough to Donald Trump. I am,” he said.

Yet, he quickly pivoted to his deeper frustration with his own party, adding, “But I’m also furious that the Democratic Party that has lost twice to Trump.” This admission underscores the internal turmoil within the Democratic ranks, with Bennet caught between opposing Trump and navigating a party brand that’s become a liability.

Democrats’ Failure to Address Voter Concerns

Bennet sharply criticized the Democratic Party’s inability to connect with voters on critical issues like the economy and education, which he believes fueled its electoral defeats.

He told Tapper, “I think they’re sick of a Democratic Party who hasn’t been able to show how we’re going to address an economy where the middle class continues to shrink and where, over the last 20 years, we’ve actually lost ground in terms of, you know, the achievement of our kids in school. We need to address those things.”

His words point to a party out of touch with the struggles of everyday Americans, particularly as the middle class continues to erode under policies Democrats have failed to counter effectively.

A September 2024 study by the Center on Reinventing Public Education reinforces Bennet’s concerns, revealing that students’ math and reading scores still lag behind pre-COVID levels. This educational decline, coupled with economic stagnation, highlights the Democrats’ failure to deliver tangible results.

For Bennet, who is eyeing a gubernatorial run, the party’s inability to address these core issues poses a significant hurdle, as voters increasingly view the Democratic brand with skepticism.

Navigating Trump’s Appeal and Party Reform

Despite his fierce opposition to Trump, whom he claimed “would not be hired for any job in his state” due to “the insanity that Trump represents and the chaos that he represents,” Bennet acknowledged the reasons behind Trump’s victories.

He explained, “But, we should understand that there were a lot of people that voted for him for a reason, and that’s because they wanted to blow up Washington, D.C. They’re not surprised by his corruption, that’s sort of a ratification of who he is.”

This recognition of Trump’s disruptive appeal reveals a rare moment of clarity from Bennet, who sees the voters’ frustration with a dysfunctional political system.

Bennet stressed the need for Democrats to offer a better alternative, saying, “And we need to show people something different.”

Yet, his party’s track record of failing to deliver on this promise leaves him in a precarious position. As he campaigns for Colorado governor in 2026 to succeed term-limited Gov. Jared Polis, Bennet must distance himself from the Democratic Party’s self-inflicted wounds while crafting a vision that resonates with a disillusioned electorate.

The party’s repeated losses and inability to counter Trump’s outsider allure make this an uphill battle, casting doubt on whether Bennet can escape the shadow of a faltering Democratic brand.

The weaponization of the justice system is nothing new. But this takes it too far.

Because a lawsuit against this top Republican sent Washington, D.C. into an uproar.

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Move to Restrict Harvard’s Foreign Student Enrollment

On Friday, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order, halting the Trump administration’s effort to revoke Harvard University’s ability to enroll international students.

The decision marks a significant development in an ongoing dispute between the administration and the university over campus conduct and federal oversight.

The judge’s order prevents the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from stripping Harvard of its certification in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program, which allows U.S. institutions to host visa-holding international students.

Hours before the ruling, Harvard filed a lawsuit accusing the administration of a “campaign of retribution” for the university’s exercise of its First Amendment rights.

The lawsuit argues, “With the stroke of a pen, the government has sought to erase a quarter of Harvard’s student body, international students who contribute significantly to the university and its mission. Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard.”

Administration’s Actions and Justification

The DHS announced the revocation of Harvard’s visa program certification less than a day earlier, citing “pro-terrorist conduct” on campus.

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem stated, “This administration is holding Harvard accountable for fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus.”

She further remarked, “It is a privilege, not a right, for universities to enroll foreign students and benefit from their higher tuition payments to help pad their multibillion-dollar endowments. Harvard had plenty of opportunity to do the right thing. It refused. They have lost their Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification as a result of their failure to adhere to the law. Let this serve as a warning to all universities and academic institutions across the country.”

The decision would have barred Harvard from admitting new foreign students and required current ones to transfer or lose their legal status in the U.S. before the upcoming academic year.

Harvard’s Legal and Institutional Response

Harvard’s lawsuit contends that the administration’s actions constitute “clear retaliation for Harvard exercising its First Amendment rights to control Harvard’s governance, curriculum and the ‘ideology’ of its faculty and students.”

In a statement to National Review, the university called the decision “unlawful,” emphasizing, “We are fully committed to maintaining Harvard’s ability to host our international students and scholars, who hail from more than 140 countries and enrich the University – and this nation – immeasurably.”

The dispute originated when Noem, on April 16, demanded records of foreign students’ “criminality and misconduct,” including protest footage and five years of disciplinary records. Harvard’s refusal to comply led to the visa program termination threat. A letter from Noem, obtained by Fox News, gave Harvard 72 hours to provide the requested information to reinstate its certification.

This legal battle follows other tensions, including the administration’s recent termination of $2.7 million in DHS grants to Harvard, and is the second lawsuit filed by the university against the administration in two weeks.

The Trump administration isn’t going to be used and abused again. And the whole world knows it.

Now Donald Trump leveled a terrifying threat against all of Europe that left foreign leaders cowering.

Trump Issues Tariff Threat Against European Union

President Donald Trump announced on Friday a plan to impose a 50% tariff on all European Union products starting June 1, citing the bloc’s challenging trade practices.

The move signals escalating tensions and a push for better trade terms, aligning with Trump’s broader strategy to address trade imbalances.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump stated, “The European Union, which was formed for the primary purpose of taking advantage of the United States on TRADE, has been very difficult to deal with.”

He highlighted grievances, noting, “Their powerful Trade Barriers, Vat Taxes, ridiculous Corporate Penalties, Non-Monetary Trade Barriers, Monetary Manipulations, unfair and unjustified lawsuits against Americans Companies, and more, have led to a Trade Deficit with the U.S. of more than $250,000,000 a year, a number which is totally unacceptable.”

The tariff threat appears designed to pressure the EU ahead of a scheduled call between EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.

Strategic Pause and Ongoing Negotiations

Following his “Liberation Day” tariff announcement on April 9, Trump instituted a 90-day pause to allow countries to negotiate lower tariff rates, maintaining a baseline 10% tariff on all nations except China.

So far, only the UK has secured a finalized deal at 10% with market access for U.S. agricultural goods, described as a “template” for future agreements.

A preliminary deal with China reduced its tariff from 145% to 30%, calculated as the 10% base rate plus a 20% penalty for insufficient action on fentanyl flows, as discussed in Switzerland talks. Trump expressed frustration with the EU, stating, “Our discussions with them are going nowhere!” despite ongoing negotiations.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News, “I would hope that this would light a fire under the EU,” suggesting the tariff threat could spur progress before the June 1 deadline.

Trump hinted last week that time for individual deals is dwindling, with his administration potentially shifting to broader package rates soon, indicating a strategic escalation to resolve trade disputes efficiently.

Broader Trade Policy Context

The EU tariff threat follows Trump’s recent announcement of a 25% tariff on Apple iPhones unless the company shifts manufacturing to the U.S., reflecting a consistent push for domestic production and fair trade terms.

The UK deal, which ensures market access for American goods, and the adjusted China tariff demonstrate Trump’s focus on leveraging tariffs to address economic and security concerns.

The EU, facing a significant trade deficit with the U.S., now confronts a critical window to negotiate before the proposed tariffs take effect, potentially reshaping transatlantic trade dynamics.

Border Czar Homan’s no nonsense approach to the border has impressed Republicans. But the Left is more mad than ever.

Now Tom Homan’s border announcement has left Democrats screaming in rage.

Border Czar Homan Hails Trump’s Reconciliation Bill

Border Czar Tom Homan expressed strong support for President Donald Trump’s “Big, Beautiful” reconciliation bill, describing it as a critical step toward securing the southern border and strengthening enforcement efforts. In an exclusive interview with The Daily Wire, Homan outlined how the legislation equips border authorities with essential resources to protect national security and public safety.

“We’ve made a lot of progress on the border, but we want to keep it permanent,” Homan told The Daily Wire outside the White House on Wednesday, ahead of the bill’s passage. “We need the money, not just for the border, but interior enforcement operations. Money for the border is gonna help continue building the border wall. Every place the border barrier’s been built, illegal immigration went down, illegal drug flow went down, so we gotta put more border wall up.”

His enthusiasm underscores the bill’s role in sustaining and expanding these achievements.

Strategic Investments in Border Security

The Republican-led House passed the reconciliation bill in a tight 215-to-214 vote early Thursday, a major win for the Trump administration after intense negotiations. Homan detailed how the funding will enhance border operations, emphasizing the need for advanced technology alongside physical barriers.

“We need the technology added to the wall so border patrol agents can communicate to one another in dead areas. It’s gonna let us know when people approach the wall, climb over the wall, dig under the wall. We need that technology. So wall and technology plus technology where there’s not a wall, right?” he explained.

Homan also highlighted the importance of technology at ports of entry to maintain efficient trade while detecting contraband, stating, “Also, technology at the ports of entry. So trade can continue at a fast pace, but we have best technology, find drugs and other contraband coming through the ports.”

Additionally, he stressed the urgent funding needs for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), noting, “ICE is in the hole right now. They’ve got about 50,000 people in beds. We’re funded for 34,000. ICE is already in the hole, so if we want to continue this massive deportation operation, we need more money.”

Addressing Criticism and Bipartisan Challenges

Homan robustly defended the administration’s border security record, asserting, “We’re doing great. Right now, the criminals arrested by ICE are about three times higher than Joe Biden under the same timeframe, but it should be 10 times higher because Joe Biden wasn’t doing anything. So we need more money to do more.”

He addressed critics who argue for more deportations, agreeing, “People are asking, they don’t think there’s enough deportations, not enough ICE arrests. I agree with ’em. I’m pushing for more arrests. We need money to do it. We need more money for boots on the ground. More money for detention beds. We should have at least a hundred thousand beds.”

He called for bipartisan support, noting, “there are a handful of Democrats that believe in border security and national security.”

However, he expressed frustration with partisan resistance, stating, “But as a party, you’re never gonna get every vote from every Democrat. ‘Cause I think a lot of ’em put politics over public safety plus politics over national security.”

Homan argued that the administration’s success exposes past failures, saying, “I think there’s a political firestorm right now. I don’t think Democrats are ever gonna agree. Our success shows their failure. Our success shows the lies of the last administration saying the border is secure, showing they’re vetting everybody, and all the lies they told we’re proving ’em wrong.”

Reflecting on his 40-year career, Homan asserted, “I’ve worked for six different presidents. I’ve seen hundreds of policies come and go. I know what works, what doesn’t. What we’re doing right now is working. It’s a game changer.”

He urged Congress to prioritize national interests, concluding, “Give us some money to deal with it, prove that you’re really representing your constituents. Prove that you actually care about the safety and security of this country. Love your community more than you hate President Trump.”

The US is done being pushed around. And everyone knows it now.

Because America flexed its military might in stunning display of power.

U.S. Demonstrates Nuclear Might with ICBM Test Launch

On Wednesday morning, the U.S. Air Force conducted a powerful display of its strategic capabilities, launching a nuclear-capable intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California.

This test, part of a routine evaluation of the nation’s formidable nuclear arsenal, underscored the United States’ ability to deliver a nuclear warhead to any point on Earth. The launch reaffirmed the reliability of America’s aging but still potent missile systems, a critical component of its defense strategy.

The Minuteman III missile, fired without a warhead, blazed across the Pacific at a staggering 15,000 miles per hour, targeting a test site in the Marshall Islands some 4,200 miles away, according to military officials.

This high-speed journey demonstrated the missile’s precision and range, reinforcing its role as a cornerstone of the U.S. nuclear deterrent.

Aging Arsenal and the Sentinel Transition

First introduced in the 1970s, the Minuteman III remains a linchpin of America’s nuclear capabilities but is nearing the end of its operational life. The Air Force has plans to replace it with the cutting-edge Sentinel system, designed to modernize the nation’s ICBM fleet.

However, the Sentinel program has faced significant hurdles, including funding shortages and developmental delays, which have slowed progress and raised concerns about the timeline for deployment.

The Air Force had initially targeted 2039 for phasing out its Cold War-era Minuteman III missiles, but setbacks in the Sentinel program—still in the testing phase—could push this transition to 2050 or beyond, according to Bloomberg.

Despite these challenges, the Air Force remains steadfast in its commitment to maintaining a robust nuclear deterrent, ensuring the Minuteman III remains fully operational until its successor is ready.

A Resilient Nuclear Triad and Strategic Assurance

Wednesday’s successful launch sent a resounding message to allies and adversaries alike: the U.S. nuclear arsenal is ready and reliable. “This ICBM test launch underscores the strength of the nation’s nuclear deterrent and the readiness of the ICBM leg of the triad,” Gen. Thomas Bussiere, commander of the U.S. Global Strike Command, declared in a statement.

The Air Force was quick to clarify that the test was a scheduled exercise, “not a response to current world events,” emphasizing its routine nature.

The U.S. “nuclear triad” forms the backbone of its strategic defense, combining nuclear-armed bombers, stealth submarines equipped with Polaris ICBMs, and approximately 400 land-based Minuteman III missiles. This multi-pronged approach ensures flexibility and resilience in the face of global threats.

The Air Force reiterated its confidence in the Sentinel program’s eventual success, stating that “until full capability is achieved, the Air Force is committed to ensuring Minuteman III remains a viable deterrent.”

This commitment highlights the military’s dedication to maintaining a credible and effective nuclear posture as it navigates the complexities of modernizing its arsenal.

The Bidens haven’t been truthful to the public. And now it’s coming back to bite them.

And the Biden family was caught in a cancer cover-up that is shattering their legacy.

New Book Alleges Biden Family Concealed Beau Biden’s Cancer Diagnosis

A recently released book claims that former President Joe Biden and his late son, Beau Biden, deliberately withheld details and misled the public about Beau’s cancer diagnosis during his tenure as Delaware’s attorney general. The allegations highlight a pattern of secrecy surrounding health issues within the Biden family, according to the authors.

Book Details and Authors

The book, Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again, authored by CNN’s Jake Tapper and Axios’s Alex Thompson, was released on Tuesday. It alleges that the Biden family actively chose to keep Beau Biden’s cancer diagnosis confidential while he served as Delaware’s attorney general.

The book states, “Beau’s cancer treatment also demonstrated the Biden’s capacity for denial and the lengths they would go to to avoid transparency about health issues, even when the person in question is an elected official, in this case the sitting attorney general of Delaware.”

Timeline of Beau Biden’s Illness

According to the book, Beau Biden collapsed during a family vacation in the summer of 2013, leading to surgery to remove a brain tumor. By fall 2013, Beau reduced his public appearances and media interviews.

The book notes, “In September, Biden and Beau’s team internally debated how much to disclose about Beau — the vice president’s son and a state’s top law enforcement officer — but ultimately said nothing.” In November 2013, Beau told a local reporter he had been given a “clean bill of health.” However, in February 2014, a neurologist disclosed that a “small lesion” had been removed from Beau’s brain, despite Joe Biden later describing the tumor as larger than a golf ball.

Efforts to Maintain Secrecy

The book details that Beau Biden continued serving as Delaware’s attorney general while undergoing treatments across the country, often using the pseudonym George Lincoln during hospital visits. Beau’s wife, Hallie, reportedly expressed confusion about the decision to keep his declining health private, believing public disclosure could have garnered support.

The book states, “Publicly acknowledging Beau’s illness would make it a reality. It was them against the world.” Neither Hallie Biden nor a spokesperson for former President Biden immediately responded to requests for comment from Fox News Digital.

The book further claims that then-Vice President Joe Biden instructed his staff to mislead the media about his whereabouts. While his team reported he was traveling to Delaware on weekends, he was also visiting Houston, where Beau was receiving treatment. This effort was part of a broader strategy to maintain privacy around Beau’s condition, according to the authors.

Context of Beau Biden’s Death and Broader Claims

Beau Biden died of a glioblastoma brain tumor in May 2015 at age 46. The book situates these allegations within a larger narrative about the 2024 election cycle, claiming that Joe Biden’s team orchestrated a cover-up to conceal the extent of his own cognitive decline during his re-election campaign. This is one of several books addressing Biden’s decision to run in 2024 and his health challenges.

Recent Biden Health Controversy

The book’s release follows former President Biden’s announcement on Sunday that he had been diagnosed with an “aggressive form” of prostate cancer, a claim his office retracted on Tuesday, stating he had never received such a diagnosis. This incident adds context to the book’s allegations about the Biden family’s handling of health-related transparency.

The allegations raise questions about transparency among public officials, particularly when health issues involve elected leaders. The Biden family’s reported reluctance to disclose Beau’s condition may reflect a broader approach to managing public perception, as outlined in the book.

Around 4 in 5 Americans got at least one COVID vaccine. They may want to pay close attention.

Because the FDA pulled COVID shots from the shelves for this terrifying reason.

FDA Revises COVID-19 Booster Guidelines

On Tuesday, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a significant update to its COVID-19 booster shot policy. The new guidance restricts access to boosters for healthy individuals under 65, moving away from the previous approach of recommending boosters for all.

This change introduces a more selective framework for booster approvals and distribution.

In an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine, FDA Commissioner Martin Makary and vaccine regulator Vinay Prasad outlined the revised policy. They stated that drugmakers must now submit clinical trial data showing that boosters improve overall health outcomes, not just antibody levels, to gain approval.

“For all healthy persons… the FDA anticipates the need for randomized, controlled trial data evaluating clinical outcomes before Biologics License Applications can be granted,” they wrote. This marks a shift from the earlier “one-size-fits-all regulatory framework” used for booster authorizations.

The authors also addressed previous justifications for broad booster recommendations. They noted, “The U.S. policy has sometimes been justified by arguing that the American people are not sophisticated enough to understand age- and risk-based recommendations.”

They added, “We reject this view,” emphasizing the need for clear, evidence-based guidance tailored to specific groups.

Continued Access for High-Risk Groups

Under the updated policy, boosters will remain available without new clinical trial data for individuals over 65 and those in high-risk categories. This includes people as young as six months with underlying health conditions.

The FDA’s definition of “high-risk” is broad, covering conditions such as obesity and depression. Estimates suggest that 100 to 200 million Americans will still qualify for boosters under these criteria.

The policy change comes as booster uptake has declined significantly. Data indicates that fewer than 25% of Americans have received a booster shot in the past two years.

Makary and Prasad highlighted uncertainties about the benefits of repeated vaccinations, stating, “We simply don’t know whether a healthy 52-year-old woman with a normal BMI who has had Covid-19 three times and has received six previous doses of a Covid-19 vaccine will benefit from the seventh dose.”

The new policy aims to address these gaps by requiring more comprehensive data.

Framework for Future Approvals

The FDA’s updated approach seeks to align booster approvals with rigorous scientific standards. The article concluded, “The FDA’s new Covid-19 philosophy represents a balance of regulatory flexibility and a commitment to gold-standard science.”

This framework prioritizes evidence generation while maintaining access for those most likely to benefit from boosters.

The Catholic Church doesn’t often wade into politics. But when it does, they bring out the big guns.

Now these Catholic Bishops shocked everyone with an endorsement of a key Trump policy.

In a bold move to uphold human dignity and protect vulnerable populations, two leading U.S. Catholic bishops have praised recent Congressional efforts to advance a budget that prioritizes life-affirming values.

Their statements reflect a growing momentum to redirect taxpayer funds away from practices that undermine the sanctity of life and family, aligning with policies championed by President Trump’s administration.

Defending the Sanctity of Life

Bishop Daniel E. Thomas, chair of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) Committee on Pro-Life Activities, and Bishop Robert E. Barron, chair of the Committee on Laity, Marriage, Family Life, and Youth, have enthusiastically endorsed provisions in the House budget reconciliation bill that cut federal funding to abortion providers like Planned Parenthood.

“For decades, Planned Parenthood has received government money and offered low-income women one terrible option: to end the lives of their babies,” the bishops stated. This legislation, they argue, takes a courageous step toward ensuring taxpayer dollars no longer subsidize abortions, aligning with the Hyde Amendment’s strict limits to cases of rape, incest, or life-threatening situations for the mother.

The bishops’ support underscores a broader movement, bolstered by President Trump’s pro-life stance, to protect the unborn and uphold the moral fabric of the nation. By redirecting funds away from organizations that profit from abortion, Congress is responding to the calls of millions of Americans who believe in the inherent dignity of every human life.

Safeguarding Youth from Harmful Practices

In addition to addressing abortion, the proposed budget includes measures to block federal funding for so-called “gender transition” services for minors under Medicaid. The bishops sharply criticized the use of taxpayer funds to promote “gender ideology,” particularly through the provision of puberty blockers and hormones to young people. “More recently, they have used the same taxpayer funds to expand their destructive offerings, by promoting gender ideology and providing puberty blockers and hormones to minors, turning them into lifelong patients in the process,” they said.

This stance resonates with President Trump’s push to protect children from irreversible medical interventions that conflict with biological reality and long-term well-being. By halting funding for such procedures, the legislation aims to shield impressionable youth from practices that the bishops describe as harmful to human dignity.

Promoting Authentic, Life-Affirming Healthcare

Beyond defunding harmful practices, Bishops Thomas and Barron called on lawmakers to redirect resources toward “authentic, life-affirming health care providers that serve mothers and their children in need.”

This vision aligns with the Trump administration’s emphasis on supporting families and ensuring access to healthcare that respects both the born and the unborn.

By reallocating funds to organizations that provide holistic support for mothers and children, Congress has an opportunity to build a culture of life that reflects the values of millions of Americans.

The bishops urged the Trump administration and lawmakers to continue championing policies that protect vulnerable populations from “mutilating ‘gender transition’ services and the scourge of abortion.”

Their message is clear: taxpayer dollars should serve the common good, not agendas that undermine the family and human dignity.

A Call to Action

“Americans should not be forced to subsidize abortions and ‘gender transition’ services with their tax dollars,” the bishops declared, echoing a sentiment shared by many who support President Trump’s leadership in advancing pro-life and pro-family policies.

As Congress moves forward with this budget, the bishops’ endorsement serves as a powerful reminder of the Church’s unwavering commitment to the sanctity of life and the well-being of families.

The Left puts anyone other than Americans first. And people are getting tired of it.

Now a leading Democrat met with a Chinese agent to sell out Americans.

Questionable Alliances: Massachusetts Cozies Up to Beijing

Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey recently rolled out the red carpet for Ambassador Chen Li, the Chinese consul general in New York, during a May 7 meeting at the state house. The cozy encounter, complete with smiling photo-ops, saw Healey touting deeper ties with China, despite mounting evidence of Beijing’s shady influence operations in the U.S.

“Today we welcomed Ambassador H.E. Chen Li to Massachusetts. We discussed our shared economic and cultural ties, and our commitment to continuing to work together for the benefit of our people and our economy,” Healey declared in a statement, seemingly oblivious to the diplomatic tightrope she was walking.

The Chinese consulate, which oversees relations with Massachusetts from its Manhattan base, gleefully posted a summary of the meeting on its Chinese-language website, claiming Healey vowed to bolster exchanges with China.

This warm rhetoric clashes with the broader U.S. stance, as President Trump’s trade war with Beijing rages on.

While a minor détente on trade barriers was reached on May 12, the federal government remains wary of China’s tactics to exploit state-level relationships to sidestep Washington’s tougher policies.

A Troubling Track Record: China’s Consulate Under Scrutiny

The sunny tone of Healey’s meeting with Chen raises eyebrows, given the Chinese consulate’s rap sheet. Over the years, the Justice Department has exposed the consulate’s role in a slew of illicit activities, from espionage to repression schemes targeting dissidents on U.S. soil.

One high-profile case involves Linda Sun, a former aide to New York Governor Kathy Hochul, accused of acting as an unregistered agent for Beijing.

Court documents allege Sun worked closely with the consulate to tilt state policies in China’s favor. She’s pleaded not guilty, with her trial looming this summer.

In another instance, Massachusetts resident Litang Liang faced charges of acting as a Chinese agent but was acquitted earlier this year. His defense argued his pro-Beijing activities were protected speech, though prosecutors claimed he funneled information about anti-CCP activists in Boston to consulate officials.

The Justice Department also revealed that senior consulate figures were linked to a secret Chinese police station in Manhattan, shut down by the FBI. Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo didn’t mince words in 2020, flatly stating the consulate was a hub for espionage.

Contrasting Approaches: Other Governors Keep Their Distance

Healey’s embrace of Chen stands in stark contrast to her East Coast counterparts. New York’s Hochul, once chummy with the consulate, swiftly distanced herself after Sun’s arrest, even demanding the expulsion of Chen’s predecessor.

New Jersey’s Phil Murphy, meanwhile, has opted for closer ties with Taiwan’s diplomats and steered clear of public coziness with China’s consulate. Healey’s decision to link her meeting with Chen to Massachusetts’ Chinese-American community—claiming they number nearly 200,000 and make “valued contributions”—is particularly tone-deaf.

Beijing’s propaganda often asserts control over all ethnically Chinese people, regardless of citizenship, a claim used to justify its global repression and influence campaigns. Many Chinese-Americans have no ties to the Chinese Communist Party, making Healey’s framing a risky nod to Beijing’s narrative.

Trump is a doer. And he’s tired of being stopped by cowards.

And now President Trump took matters into his own hands after Congressional Republicans failed him.

President Donald Trump is set to make a bold appearance on Capitol Hill Tuesday morning, rallying House Republicans around his ambitious “one, big, beautiful bill.” This sweeping legislation encapsulates Trump’s vision for America, tackling tax reform, immigration, defense, energy, and the debt ceiling. His hands-on approach signals a renewed energy in Washington, as Republicans work to deliver on his campaign promises. Below, we explore Trump’s leadership, the bill’s key components, and the challenges facing the GOP as they aim to reshape the nation’s future.

Trump’s Commanding Presence in Washington

President Trump’s visit to the House GOP’s weekly conference meeting, confirmed by three House GOP sources and two White House officials to Fox News Digital and Fox News Radio, underscores his commitment to driving his agenda forward.

The closed-door, hour-long session offers Trump a platform to unify Republicans behind a transformative bill that addresses tax cuts, border security, military strength, energy independence, and fiscal responsibility.

“He wants to be involved as much as we need him,” House Speaker Mike Johnson said, noting Trump’s enthusiasm during a Monday morning call.

This escalation in Trump’s involvement marks a refreshing shift from the often-distant leadership of past administrations. His willingness to engage directly with lawmakers reflects a leader determined to deliver results, not just rhetoric.

With the national debt soaring past $36 trillion, Trump’s push for a comprehensive bill via budget reconciliation—which lowers the Senate’s passage threshold to 51 votes—demonstrates his strategic acumen in navigating Washington’s complexities to achieve his America First goals.

A Bold Agenda with Internal Hurdles

The legislation, described as a cornerstone of Trump’s presidency, aims to overhaul multiple sectors while putting the country on a sounder fiscal path. Conservatives are advocating for aggressive reforms, such as accelerating work requirements for Medicaid recipients, currently set for 2029, to curb waste and promote self-reliance.

Fiscal hawks are also demanding an immediate repeal of the Biden administration’s green energy subsidies from the Inflation Reduction Act, fulfilling Trump’s campaign pledge to prioritize American energy dominance over costly environmental mandates.

However, internal GOP divisions pose challenges. Moderates hesitate to slash Medicaid, wary of backlash in their districts, while blue-state Republicans push to raise the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap—a move opposed by colleagues in lower-tax states who see it as benefiting Democrat-run areas.

Despite these tensions, Trump’s leadership offers a unifying force, with his Capitol Hill appearance likely to galvanize lawmakers.

His track record of brokering deals suggests he can bridge these divides, ensuring the bill advances by the House’s Memorial Day target and reaches his desk by the Fourth of July.

A Vision for America’s Future

The GOP’s use of budget reconciliation to bypass Democratic obstruction highlights Trump’s pragmatic approach to governance. By focusing on taxation, the federal budget, and the national debt, the bill sidesteps the Senate’s 60-vote requirement, empowering Republicans to enact sweeping change.

The House Rules Committee, set to review the bill at 1 a.m. Wednesday, serves as the final hurdle before a House-wide vote, with Republicans aiming to pass it by week’s end.

Trump’s vision, as articulated through this legislation, prioritizes economic growth, border security, and energy independence while addressing the nation’s fiscal crisis. His active role contrasts sharply with the Biden era’s stagnation, offering hope to Americans weary of bureaucratic gridlock.

As Speaker Johnson noted, Trump is “very excited, very encouraged,” and his Capitol Hill visit is poised to rally the GOP around a bill that could redefine America’s trajectory. With Trump at the helm, Republicans have a rare opportunity to deliver bold, lasting change.