The number of illegal immigrants pouring into this country is astounding. It raises the question: is this really an accident?

Well now Homeland Security got caught funneling illegals in devastating blow to Kamala Harris.

A bombshell report from a conservative organization has revealed that a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official has been actively promoting illegal immigration into the U.S. through platforms like YouTube and TikTok.

According to the report, Wilson Osorio, an associate counsel with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), has been using social media to offer advice and encouragement to border crossers.

Fox News Digital reached out to DHS and USCIS to confirm Osorio’s employment and request comment on the disturbing report.

Soon after Fox’s inquiry, Osorio’s YouTube and TikTok accounts were suddenly made private, and his LinkedIn profile appeared to vanish from the internet—raising even more questions about what he’s been up to.

The American Accountability Foundation, the conservative watchdog group behind the report, translated and analyzed Osorio’s videos, many of which feature conversations with illegal immigrants.

“Osorio uses his TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram channels to post video content, mostly of conversations with illegal immigrants, where he asks the individuals to tell those watching how much money they make, how they came to the United States, and how wonderful it is to illegally enter and settle in the U.S.,” the report says.

According to the report, Osorio has been posting these videos since July, with dozens of clips across multiple platforms.

In one video, he showcases an illegal immigrant who now owns a restaurant, describing it with a rosy narrative: “The American Dream is alive and well. This is the story of a Honduran immigrant who entered the United States illegally ~20 years ago. With hard work and dedication, he is now the owner of an expanding restaurant which brings in over $1 million in sales.”

Other videos highlight stories like a migrant earning $1,000 a week selling fruit and another who gives tips to those looking to cross the border illegally, warning of dangers like smugglers and the brutal desert heat.

One particularly concerning video is titled “In 3 years my daughters and I already have papers in the USA,” where a woman explains that crossing illegally and having three daughters helped her avoid deportation and get a work permit.

In yet another video, Osorio’s description reads, “In the [US] you work hard for your money but crossing the border was worth it. Thanks to my work here, I built a house in Honduras and I will soon be moving back.”

One person, who received Reagan-era amnesty, boasts, “I got papers through amnesty, and now I am a citizen.”

The videos also spotlight the “important role” undocumented immigrants play in industries like construction, while offering advice on how illegal immigrants can collect unpaid wages from employers.

Thomas Jones, president of the American Accountability Foundation, didn’t mince words about the severity of the situation: “Wilson Osorio personifies the plague of unelected radical leftist bureaucrats turning this country upside down,” Jones said.

“Even as he collects his taxpayer-funded salary, Osorio pushes his radical open borders agenda that is endangering the safety, stability and livelihoods of millions of Americans. It is an utter betrayal of the American people. He must be fired immediately.”

DHS declined to comment on Osorio’s social media activity, further fueling concerns about transparency within the agency.

Senator Mike Lee, R-Utah, also weighed in, calling federal employees who promote illegal activity a “severe breach of public trust,” and linking Osorio’s actions to the broader failure of the Biden administration’s border policies.

“Unfortunately, this is unsurprising for the Biden-Harris administration and Mayorkas’ DHS, which has worked for four years to destroy America’s borders and invite illegal aliens, including thousands of violent criminals, to our shores,” Lee said to Fox News Digital.

“Americans desperately need real leadership in the White House, the Department of Homeland Security, and across the federal government.”

With reports like this, it’s no wonder so many Americans are concerned about the state of the border and the radical agendas being pushed from within the very institutions meant to protect us.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The vice president’s focus has been on beating Donald Trump. But now she’s been hit with a rude awakening.

Because a devastating test result is sending Kamala Harris into a tailspin.

With the 2024 presidential election just weeks away, a majority of Americans are expressing dissatisfaction with their current situation compared to four years ago, according to a new Gallup poll released Friday.

The numbers don’t lie: most Americans feel they are worse off under the Biden-Harris administration than they were back in 2020.

Gallup’s data shows that 52% of respondents said they were “not better off,” a striking contrast to the optimism Americans felt when Trump was in office.

For context, this percentage is even higher than in 1992, the year when sitting President George H.W. Bush was soundly defeated. The poll is a strong indicator that many voters are disillusioned by the current state of affairs.

In a survey conducted in mid-to-late September, Gallup posed the classic question: “Would you say you and your family are better off now than you were four years ago, or are you worse off now?”

The results are telling. Only 39% said they were “better off,” while a notable 9% said their situation remained unchanged.

Interestingly, the poll reveals a significant partisan divide. A whopping 72% of Democrats reported feeling “better off” since 2020.

However, just 7% of Republicans shared that sentiment. Among independent voters, only 35% said they were better off, trailing the national average by four points—a reflection of broader discontent outside of party lines.

Historically, the “Are you better off?” question has served as a litmus test for voter sentiment during presidential elections, dating back to Ronald Reagan’s 1980 campaign.

Gallup has tracked responses in previous elections, including 1992, 2004, 2012, and 2020.

The 2024 results, according to Gallup Deputy Director Mary Claire Evans, most closely resemble 1992—another year when voters turned their backs on an incumbent president.

In 1992, just 38% of Americans felt they were better off, and Bill Clinton capitalized on that dissatisfaction, winning the presidency.

Similar frustration is brewing today, but this time, it’s directed at the Biden-Harris administration.

Even more concerning for Biden and Harris is the stark contrast with 2020. Back then, 55% of voters told Gallup they were better off, yet despite this, Trump still lost his reelection bid.

Evans attributes this discrepancy to a sharp divide in how Republicans and Democrats perceive their situation.

Meanwhile, as the economy remains a central issue for voters, a recent report by CatholicVote aligns with these gloomy sentiments.

Economists EJ Antoni and Peter St Onge argue that “after adjusting government statistics to more accurately measure inflation, it became clear that the country has been in a recession for the past two years under the Biden-Harris administration.”

In their analysis, the economists suggest that the public’s view of the economy is in line with reality, despite the administration’s attempts to paint a rosier picture.

As Antoni bluntly put it on X: “You feel worse off today than 4 years ago b/c you are.”

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Left is running out of options. They can’t win this race on their merits, so they’re stooping further and further down.

And now a top Democrat was caught in a baldfaced lie about Trump on MSNBC.

Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville is at it again, peddling fear and hysteria over a potential Trump presidency, claiming that a future President Trump would somehow round up his political critics.

This is just the latest in a series of overblown, doomsday predictions from the left, trying to scare voters as Trump’s momentum grows.

Carville, speaking on MSNBC’s Ari Melber show, seemed panicked about Trump’s rising popularity and his straightforward rhetoric about how he would lead the country.

Carville’s main gripe? That Trump would have the “legitimacy” of an election to back up his plans if he wins.

Well, that’s exactly how democracy works, isn’t it? If Trump wins, it’s because the people want him back, not because of some wild scheme Carville imagines.

“If he wins, he’s gonna say, ‘I told people I was going to do this. I have the legitimacy of an election behind me,’” Carville said.

And here’s the kicker—Carville even admitted that Trump would have a point! Carville’s meltdown over polling and his criticism of journalists obsessing over Harris’ sinking support shows just how out of touch he and his colleagues have become.

He tried to spin this into a warning about the Constitution being “at risk,” as if Trump’s plans are more threatening than the chaotic policies we’ve seen under the Harris-Biden administration.

In reality, Trump stands for restoring law and order, securing the border, and defending the very Constitution that Carville claims is under attack.

In a bizarre rant, Carville told journalists, “He’s gonna arrest all of ya,” suggesting that Trump would somehow lock up the media, himself included.

This kind of exaggerated paranoia from the left shows just how desperate they are to paint Trump as an authoritarian.

Carville went on to say, “When the paddy wagon comes, you and I are going to be in the back of it, bouncing around.”

Really? This is what the Democrats are reduced to—scare tactics and fantasy scenarios about Trump taking over the country like a dictator.

MSNBC hosts Al Sharpton and Donny Deutsch joined the chorus, with Deutsch suggesting they’d be put on Trump’s “enemy list” if he wins.

What they won’t admit is that Trump’s policies focus on making America stronger, more secure, and putting the interests of the American people first.

But instead of addressing the real issues, Carville and his crew continue to push the same old fear-mongering narrative.

It’s clear: the left is terrified of Trump’s return, and their attempts to demonize him are getting more desperate as Election Day draws closer.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Democrats know it’s not looking good for them. They’re pulling out all the stops.

And now Biden-Harris are moving to buy votes with an egregious October surprise.

The polls are proving that the bill of goods the Left is trying to sell just isn’t going the distance.

They’ll need to move quick if they have any hope of turning this around.

And they think they’ve found the silver bullet.

The Harris-Biden administration is once again playing politics with student loans, extending a moratorium on federal student loan repayments just weeks before the election.

With legal challenges mounting against Biden’s $475 billion debt cancellation plan, it seems no coincidence that the administration is using this hot-button issue to try and sway voters.

Around 8 million borrowers enrolled in the administration’s Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan will get another six-month reprieve from paying their loans—giving the impression that the administration is “taking action” right when they need votes the most.

Biden’s massive loan forgiveness initiative, which was blocked by the 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals, is a blatant attempt to sidestep the courts and keep his promise to cancel debt, even though this move puts taxpayers on the hook.

His administration had already canceled $5.5 billion in student loans before the courts intervened, showing that they were determined to push their agenda regardless of legal or fiscal consequences.

The SAVE plan, unveiled after the Supreme Court struck down an earlier effort that could have cost up to $430 billion, is now under fire from critics who argue that Biden and Harris are simply trying to “buy votes.”

Congressional Republicans have been vocal about the timing of this move, and it’s hard not to see it as an election-year stunt.

The repayment pause conveniently follows Biden’s cancellation of another $4.5 billion in student loans for public workers—a move that was also heavily publicized just days before.

As Biden boasted last week:

“We vowed to fix that, and because of actions from our administration, now over 1 million public service workers have gotten the relief they are entitled to under the law.”

But many see this as yet another ploy to win over key voting blocs as Election Day nears.

Meanwhile, the Education Department has confirmed that borrowers enrolled in the SAVE plan will have their payments placed in interest-free forbearance.

With payments initially paused in July, the timing couldn’t be more transparent.

Once again, the Harris-Biden administration is using student debt as a tool to manipulate voters, all while skirting around the legal obstacles in their way.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

If kamala wasn’t tripping herself up enough, Biden is always there to make it worse. But this is terrible timing.

Because Biden delivered a devastating loss to Kamala Harris straight out of left field.

The federal government just posted its worst non-pandemic deficit in history, spilling over $1.8 trillion in red ink, signaling even tougher economic times ahead.

This staggering deficit is second only to the massive spending spree during the COVID-19 emergency.

According to the Treasury Department, the U.S. crossed a grim threshold by paying over $1 trillion in gross interest on the federal debt, a first in the nation’s history.

Despite a significant surge in tax revenue—nearly $480 billion or 11%—the influx couldn’t keep pace with the insatiable spending from Congress, President Biden, and the strain of an aging population. The government ended up spending $620 billion more than it did in 2023.

Fiscal 2024 saw record revenue of $4.9 trillion, but that was no match for the $6.8 trillion in government spending. While lower than the pandemic-fueled spending of 2020, it’s clear the Biden administration’s freewheeling approach to spending is far from over.

Despite the disastrous fiscal outcome, Biden’s team tried to put a positive spin on things. Shalanda Young, the White House budget director, hailed the administration’s so-called accomplishments, claiming Biden’s policies have grown the economy, lowered the deficit, and delivered progress for the American people. Yet, the reality paints a different picture.

While administration officials tout this nearly $2 trillion deficit as an improvement over the pandemic years, it’s a hollow victory. In 2020, the government was $3.1 trillion in the red, followed by $2.8 trillion in 2021.

As emergency spending dried up, the deficit was still $1.4 trillion in 2022, only to worsen in the years since. Last year’s $1.7 trillion gap pales compared to this year’s record-shattering figure.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) attributed the revenue surge primarily to individual income and corporate taxes, but Social Security and Medicare also saw steep increases due to new enrollees and higher rates.

However, the biggest financial sinkhole was interest on the public debt, which shot up by $254 billion in one year, overwhelming even the rise in Social Security and Medicare combined.

Treasury officials tried to downplay the situation by noting that the ratio of debt to GDP isn’t as bad as in the early 1990s.

They also pointed to a slight drop in interest payments in September due to a Federal Reserve rate cut, but that’s little comfort in the face of the mounting interest burden that continues to eat away at the budget.

Biden officials also claimed that the Supreme Court’s decision to block Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan skewed the deficit numbers. The ruling added $334 billion in revenue that would have otherwise inflated this year’s deficit further.

Even with this accounting trick, Biden’s piecemeal approach to student loan forgiveness continues to bloat the education budget, which has more than doubled in the last five years—from $135 billion in 2019 to $305 billion in 2024.

Despite these alarming numbers, the massive deficit barely made a ripple in the presidential campaigns of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, who both propose more spending and tax breaks.

Former President Barack Obama, stumping for Harris, blamed Trump’s 2017 tax cuts for increasing the deficit, though the latest Treasury data suggests otherwise.

Government revenue in 2024 exceeded earlier projections by $400 billion, meaning the bigger problem lies in the out-of-control spending under the Biden administration.

The CBO’s original spending projection for 2024 was $5.7 trillion. Instead, the government blew past that, spending an extra $1.1 trillion, proving that Biden’s spending spree is pushing the nation further into the fiscal abyss.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

We all know Kamala is capable of some low things. But this takes the cake.

And this video of Kamala exposed her more than you could ever imagine.

Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign has produced a new digital advertisement that targets Black men’s love life, implying that they will be rejected by women if they do not plan to vote.

The advertisements show a dating game in which a Black man approaches a bunch of ladies clutching balloons. They start asking him things about himself, such as how much he makes, how tall he is, and whether he exercises out.

The women appear to respond positively to the man’s answers until one asks him if he intends to vote in November.

New Harris/Walz ad tells black men that women will reject them if they don’t vote. Memorable and works as an appeal to self-interest. pic.twitter.com/9EKlOEIEU2

— Richard Hanania (@RichardHanania) October 19, 2024

“Nah, not my thing,” the man adds, causing all of the women on the scene to pop their balloons.

“Vote. Election Day is Nov 5,” reads a message at the end of the ad alongside a Harris-Walz campaign logo.

“New Harris/Walz ad tells black men that women will reject them if they don’t vote,” Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology President Richard Hanania remarked in a post on X along with a video of the ad. “Memorable and works as an appeal to self-interest.”

However, not all people agreed with the ad’s substance, with some claiming it merely served to “insult” and “dehumanize” Black men.

“Democrats continue to dehumanize and insult black men and try to shame and pressure them into only voting for them,” according to a user. “Kamala campaign doesn’t even try to engage respectfully.”

“Does the Harris Walz team really believe this will convince anyone to vote for them?” replied a different person.

“Belittling and insulting,” another user commented.

“I think this might have the opposite effect,” one user remarked.

The commercial comes as some think that Harris is struggling to gain the support of young Black men, a traditionally reliable demographic for Democrats.

According to a Howard University Initiative on Public Opinion poll, 81% of Black men intend to vote for Harris, but that figure lowers to 68% among Black men under 50, with 21% planning to vote for former President Trump.

Former President Barack Obama has also weighed in on the latest appeal to Black men, suggesting during a rally in Pennsylvania earlier this month that the group should be as enthusiastic about Harris as they were for his campaigns in 2008 and 2012.

“My understanding, based on reports I’m getting from campaigns and communities, is that we have not yet seen the same kinds of energy and turnout in all quarters of our neighborhoods and communities as we saw when I was running,” Obama said at the time, adding that the lack of enthusiasm “seems to be more pronounced with the brothers” and that they may be hesitant to support a female president.

“And you are thinking about sitting out?” he asked. “Part of it makes me think – and I’m speaking to men directly – part of it makes me think that, well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president, and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for that.”

The Harris campaign did not immediately reply to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

There is no love lost between Joe and Kamala. They’ve chosen their sides.

But now explosive rift between Biden and Harris could sink Kamala’s campaign.

It wasn’t long ago that Joe Biden commanded the attention of everyone in the media.

Granted, it was usually due to a gaffe or a tumble he took on stage, but at least he was in the limelight.

Then, Kamala Harris stripped that away from him within days.

Now the Democrats are trying to pretend that everything is fine and Kamala and Joe are best of friend.

But that’s not what Kamala’s doing.

Vice President Kamala Harris seems to be doing everything she can to distance herself from the sinking ship that is the Biden administration, as reports confirm she has no plans to campaign in-person with President Biden in the crucial weeks leading up to Election Day.

It appears Harris is trying to save herself from the political fallout of Biden’s disastrous presidency, and the White House is going along with it.

According to NBC News, Harris is avoiding appearances with Biden, a telling sign of her lack of confidence in the administration she’s been a part of.

Despite leading within the Biden administration for years, Harris is now trying to rebrand herself as a “change” candidate, as if voters will somehow forget her direct involvement in the policies that have harmed the country.

She continues to claim that a Harris presidency would not be “a continuation of the Biden presidency,” as if her role as his second-in-command could be easily erased.

In an exclusive interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier, Harris attempted to explain how she would be different from Biden, stating, “My presidency will not be a continuation of Joe Biden’s presidency… I represent a new generation of leadership.”

But her vague promises of “fresh and new ideas” ring hollow when she has been deeply embedded in the very administration she now seems eager to disassociate from.

Harris also made a weak attempt to suggest that she’s not part of the Washington establishment, claiming:

“I am someone who has not spent the majority of my career in Washington, D.C.”

However, her time as vice president has shown that her policies and priorities align closely with the D.C. political elite.

Meanwhile, former President Trump is rightly pointing out that Harris is nothing more than a continuation of Biden’s failed policies on the economy and immigration.

Voters know that a Harris presidency would likely deliver more of the same, and it’s no surprise that Trump continues to lead in polls on these critical issues.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Democrats are still trying to throw Trump behind bars. They want to before he can be inaugurated in January.

And the Judge in the Trump classified docs case just handed down a big decision.

Judge Tanya Chutkan Makes Trump Case Documents Public Right Before Election

In a significant development in the federal election interference case against former President Donald Trump, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has made additional documents from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation public. This release comes just weeks ahead of the crucial 2024 presidential election.

The documents, which include Smith’s appendix of exhibits, pertain to the ongoing debate over whether Trump possesses a level of presidential immunity that could negate the charges against him. Judge Chutkan ordered the release on Thursday night, with hundreds of pages now accessible to the public.

While some material has been previously disclosed—such as transcripts from the House Select Committee investigating the January 6th Capitol riot—other documents include Trump campaign press releases, fundraising emails, White House press conference transcripts, and news articles.

In her ruling, Judge Chutkan referenced Trump’s claims that the “asymmetric release of charged allegations and related documents during early voting creates a concerning appearance of election interference.” She emphasized that withholding information from the public solely due to potential political consequences could itself constitute election interference.

“If the court withheld information that the public otherwise had a right to access solely because of the potential political consequences of releasing it, that withholding could itself constitute — or appear to be — election interference,” she stated. Chutkan reaffirmed that the court would maintain a focus on legal principles rather than political considerations, despite the defense’s requests.

More blatant lawfare and election interference by Biden-Kamala’s Jack Smith and DC Obama Judge Tanya Chutkan.

They’re publicly dumping a one-sided political narrative tomorrow.

With the election less than 3 weeks away.

After waiting nearly 3 years to bring the (bogus) charges. pic.twitter.com/2a9BLNGcWV

— 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (@mrddmia) October 18, 2024

Trump, who has pleaded not guilty to all charges brought against him, faces accusations stemming from his actions after losing the 2020 election. Earlier this year, the Supreme Court ruled that a president is immune from prosecution for official acts, prompting Smith to revise the charges against Trump to comply with this ruling.

In a recently unsealed filing, Smith alleged that Trump “resorted to crimes to try to stay in office” and described a coordinated effort involving private co-conspirators to overturn the legitimate results of the election in seven states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

Smith’s claims include assertions of deceitful conspiracy aimed at obstructing the federal government’s processes for counting election results, violating the Electoral Count Act, and infringing on the voting rights of millions of Americans.

This paragraph by Judge Chutkan in the Trump case is unbelievable. She's basically saying if the Court doesn't directly inject itself into the election, that itself would be interfering in the election. pic.twitter.com/2Plv0hIY16

— Unauthorized Narrative (@mgEyesOpen) October 18, 2024

Prudent Politics will update our readers on any new reports from this ongoing legal case.

Harris is plummeting. Her poll numbers keep dropping like flies and she’s showing no signs of bouncing back.

And this leaked phone call could put the final nail in the Kamala Harris campaign.

As Hurricane Milton loomed over Florida, Vice President Kamala Harris shared a video of herself on a phone call with St. Petersburg Mayor Ken Welch, giving the impression that she was actively involved in the state’s hurricane preparedness.

However, the New York Post reported that the video had been altered, removing a segment of the staged conversation in which Harris described herself as a “devout public servant” and criticized bureaucratic hurdles that slow down federal aid. The deleted portion totaled 38 seconds from the two-minute call.

“I am a devout public servant, but I know how bureaucracy and red tape can get in the way of getting stuff done in a timely manner,” Harris said in the omitted part of the call, according to a fuller recording obtained by the Post.

The edited clip also excluded a moment where Harris gave advice to Welch on leadership, encouraging him to inspire confidence in his constituents.

“Your folks are looking in your eyes to make sure and see something in you that lets them know everything’s going to be OK, and sometimes you know everything’s going to be OK, sometimes you don’t,” Harris originally said. In the version shared online, however, only her closing words—”sometimes you know everything’s going to be OK, sometimes you don’t”—remained.

Minor tweaks were made elsewhere in the video as well, including the removal of a filler phrase where Harris said “you know,” the Post reported.

Harris shared the video amidst her ongoing claim that Florida Governor Ron DeSantis had declined to take her phone call.

Harris had accused DeSantis of being “utterly irresponsible” and “selfish,” even as Florida grappled with the aftermath of a disaster. Despite this, as noted by The Daily Wire, the vice president played no formal role in the state’s disaster relief efforts.

In contrast, President Joe Biden’s team soon posted an update on X (formerly Twitter) confirming that Biden had spoken with both DeSantis and Tampa Mayor Jane Castor.

“Tonight, I spoke with Florida Governor DeSantis and Tampa Mayor Castor for firsthand reports on Hurricane Helene recovery and preparations for Hurricane Milton,” the post read. “My Administration is ready to support both leaders and the people of Florida with any further resources they may need.”

DeSantis quickly dismissed Harris’ allegations, asserting that she had never attempted to contact him and had no involvement in his administration’s disaster response.

He emphasized that Harris had “no role” in the process, adding that she wasn’t even part of the official chain of command for handling the crisis.

The revelation that Harris had doctored her conversation with Welch emerged as CBS News faced its own editing controversy involving the vice president.

According to The Daily Wire, CBS was accused of editing Harris’ response during a “60 Minutes” interview, prompting several U.S. Senators to demand the network release the full transcript.

In an original clip posted by CBS, Harris commented on U.S. policy in Israel, stating: “The work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region.”

However, the version that aired on TV replaced that remark with an unrelated comment from a different part of the interview.

These controversies highlight the growing scrutiny over how Leftists like Kamala Harris are being presented in the media, both by their own teams and the networks that cover them. It’s easy to see how they are assisted by the media in a way that should disgust any American who is watching.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

This might be the weirdest presidential election season. Democrats in particular are all over the place.

Because key Democrats have just suddenly changed course to praise Donald Trump.

As the 2024 campaign approaches its climax, several Democratic Senate candidates are surprisingly touting policies from former President Donald Trump in their advertisements. Senators Bob Casey of Pennsylvania and Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, along with Michigan Representative Elissa Slotkin, have recently unveiled new political ads that highlight Trump-era initiatives.

Tammy Baldwin’s latest ad focuses on increasing the use of American materials in domestic infrastructure projects. In the advertisement, Baldwin states, “We can’t let China steal Wisconsin jobs, so I wrote a law to require American infrastructure projects use American iron and steel.” The ad further emphasizes her achievements, noting, “Tammy Baldwin got President Trump to sign her Made in America bill. And then, she got President Biden to make it permanent.”

In a related vein, Senator Bob Casey has also launched an ad that aligns with Trump’s pro-fracking stance. The ad touts, “Casey’s leading the effort to stop corporate greedflation and price gouging. Casey bucked Biden to protect fracking, and he sided with Trump to end NAFTA and put tariffs on China to stop them from cheating.” Trump himself has been vocal about fracking, supporting the idea that local voters should determine its future.

Meanwhile, Elissa Slotkin has released a television advertisement critiquing electric vehicle (EV) mandates, a policy she previously endorsed. In the ad, Slotkin asserts, “I’m Elissa Slotkin, I live on a dirt road, nowhere near a charging station. So I don’t own an electric car. No one should tell us what to buy, and no one’s gonna mandate anything. But here’s the thing, if there’s going to be a new generation of vehicles, I want that new generation built right here in Michigan, not China. I approve this message because what you drive is your call, no one else’s.”

This statement comes as the Biden-Harris administration continues to push initiatives aimed at increasing EV adoption, including plans to install 500,000 charging stations by 2030. However, progress has been slow, leading many U.S. autoworkers to reconsider their support for the Biden administration in favor of Trump.

Slotkin’s race against Republican opponent Mike Rogers is particularly close, as indicated by a recent Quinnipiac poll that classifies Michigan as a tossup state. As these candidates navigate their campaigns, the blending of Democratic rhetoric with Trump’s policies signals a complex political landscape in the lead-up to the election.

Even Kamala Harris herself has had a stark change of mind and endorsed quite a few big Donald Trump policies, such as “No Tax On Tips” which she announced she supported after Donald had already done so months before her.

🚨 Breaking. Kamala Harris just stole Trumps " NO TAX on TIPS " Proposal

Everything about her is Fake! pic.twitter.com/eYRiT1Htnk

— Terrence K. Williams (@w_terrence) August 11, 2024

She’s been facing intense criticism for failing to give a legitimate answer for how different her “core values” in politics are now that she’s in a general election race compared to when she was running in the Democrat primary four years ago.

There’s no easy way to explain how she went from saying fracking needs to be outright banned four years ago to saying that she’s a “big supporter” of fracking and all energy sources for America. She quite literally said it was “no question” four years ago.

Reminder- Kamala Harris will ban fracking and here is her telling you she’s in favor of it. pic.twitter.com/q3LfWgOikR

— 🔥🇺🇸 KC 🇺🇸🔥 (@KCPayTreeIt) October 13, 2024

Prudent Politics is keeping our readers informed on major 2024 election news.

The Bidens have been trying to lay low. But Hunter Biden is back in the news.

Because Hunter Biden has launched a new massive lawsuit against Fox News.

Hunter Biden Launches Lawsuit Against Fox News Over Allegedly Unauthorized Images

Hunter Biden is reigniting his legal battle against Fox News, claiming the network published explicit images of him without his consent. This lawsuit is related to a since-deleted series aired on the network’s streaming platform.

Initially, Biden filed a lawsuit against Fox News in July but withdrew it after his father, President Joe Biden, suspended his presidential campaign amid concerns about his mental fitness. In response to the revived lawsuit, Fox News issued a statement asserting that “Hunter Biden’s now second lawsuit against FOX News shopped to a different court is once again devoid of any merit.” They emphasized that the core complaint arises from a 2022 streaming program that Biden only addressed after sending a letter in April 2024.

Fox News noted, “The program was removed within days of that letter, in an abundance of caution, but Mr. Biden is a public figure who has been the subject of multiple investigations and is now a convicted felon.” They reiterated their commitment to the First Amendment, stating, “Consistent with the First Amendment, FOX News has accurately covered the newsworthy events of his own making, and we look forward to vindicating our rights in court.”

Biden’s latest lawsuit has been filed in New York state court, a change from his previous federal filing, and it includes both a current and a former Fox executive as defendants. Prior to Biden’s initial legal challenge, Fox News had already removed the controversial streaming series, which depicted him on trial for bribery and foreign-agent charges.

Hunter Biden has refiled a lawsuit accusing Fox News of illegally publishing explicit images of him in a streaming series. The younger Biden initially sued Fox in New York in July over images used in a Fox Nation series. He withdrew the suit without explanation three weeks later,… pic.twitter.com/wbiplGQ5vj

— Alma Gentil (@Chinoy200096633) October 16, 2024

The lawsuit contends that “Defendants published and disseminated these Intimate Images to their vast audience of millions as part of an entertainment program in order to humiliate, harass, annoy, and alarm Mr. Biden and to tarnish his reputation.” It accuses the defendants of knowingly publishing private images that were “hacked, stolen, and/or manipulated digital material” intended to remain confidential and were disseminated unlawfully.

Biden is seeking a jury trial to establish his eligibility for compensatory damages and to determine if Fox News should pay punitive damages for broadcasting the explicit images. The high-profile law firm Geragos and Geragos filed the lawsuit on his behalf in the New York state supreme court, while Fox News aims to have the case moved to federal court.

This lawsuit represents a broader legal strategy by Biden against his political adversaries. Over recent years, Fox News has extensively reported on Hunter Biden’s personal issues, lucrative foreign business dealings, and various legal challenges.

In June, a Delaware jury found Biden guilty on three federal gun charges linked to his purchase of a firearm while addicted to crack cocaine six years ago. Two of these charges involved lying about his drug addiction on gun purchase paperwork, while the third was for possessing the firearm during his addiction. His sentencing is scheduled for later this year, with a potential maximum of 25 years in prison, though he is likely to receive a reduced sentence as a first-time offender.

Additionally, last month, Hunter Biden pleaded guilty to criminal tax charges in California, avoiding trial on nine offenses related to his failure to pay over $1.4 million in taxes on time over a four-year period. Sentencing for these tax charges is set for mid-December.

🚨 #BREAKING: Hunter Biden will be pleading GUILTY to federal tax crimes today, including multiple felonies

He faces up to 17 years in prison.

BUT he knows daddy will pardon him on his way out the door, so what’s it matter? 🙄 pic.twitter.com/XJLihyWc3X

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 5, 2024

Prudent Politics will be updating our readers along the way as this lawsuit develops.

The former president is a head case to say the least. Controversy seems to follow him at every turn.

And Bill Clinton was caught in yet another scandal after his latest creepy actions were exposed.

In a moment that left attendees shocked, former President Bill Clinton, 78, shared personal and unexpected memories of Ethel Kennedy during her funeral on Wednesday.

Speaking at the Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle in Washington, D.C., Clinton recalled the widow of Robert F. Kennedy with fondness, describing her as a vibrant and lively figure who “would flirt with me in the most innocent ways.”

“I thought your mother was the cat’s meow,” Clinton oddly said, addressing Kennedy’s children.

“She would flirt with me in the most innocent ways.” He continued to reminisce about Ethel, who passed away on October 10 at the age of 96.

Clinton, who was famously impeached in 1998 over his affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky, shared lighthearted stories of Valentine’s Day cards and exchanges with Ethel Kennedy.

The Kennedy matriarch, who was known for her spirited personality and as the mother of 11 children, had been widowed since 1968 when her husband, Robert F. Kennedy, was assassinated during his run for the Democratic presidential nomination.

“She was an amazing fireball of continuous energy. It was wonderful to be around her,” Clinton recalled, emphasizing the joy she brought to those around her.

He shared a poem from one of the many Valentine’s cards she had sent him over the years:

“Roses are red, violets are blue, I’m surrounded by love, but there’s still room for you.”

Clinton explained, “I think that’s the way she let us all feel.”

The former president’s heartfelt eulogy resonated with those in attendance, including Ethel’s daughter, Kerry Kennedy, who later added her own memories.

“President Clinton said that mummy flirted with him, and you know she loved each of you,” she said, addressing Clinton, former President Barack Obama, and outgoing President Joe Biden, all seated in the front row.

Kerry Kennedy lightened the mood further with her own recollections of her mother’s playful spirit. “A few weeks ago I called her from Italy and I said, ‘Mummy, I’m in Italy. Is there anything I can bring you?’ And she said, ‘An Italian would be nice.’”

President Biden, who also spoke at the marathon three-hour service, reflected on his own memories of receiving Valentine’s Day cards from Ethel Kennedy.

He recalled one card featuring a picture of him and Ethel surrounded by hearts, with a poem reading, “I’m not Bide’n my time waiting for you valentine because he’s no ordinary Joe.”

“I don’t know how many you got that d*mned Valentine, but I tell you what, it meant a lot to me,” Biden said, smiling as he closed out the tributes.

And while Ethel Kennedy’s flirting with the former Democrat president was innocent, we wouldn’t put it past Bill Clinton to perceive it a little more seriously.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.