Home Blog Page 6

Iran makes a stunning move that throws a wrench in Donald Trump’s plans

Trump has made a name for himself as a peace maker. But some are still beating the war drum.

Now Iran made a stunning move that threw a wrench in Donald Trump’s plans.

In a fiery address, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei unleashed a torrent of criticism against President Donald Trump, speaking to a fervent crowd chanting anti-American slogans. This outburst comes as the United States, under Trump’s leadership, pushes for a robust new nuclear agreement with Iran to curb its ambitions. Below, we explore Khamenei’s remarks, the context of Trump’s Middle East strategy, and the ongoing diplomatic tightrope.

Tensions Flare Over Middle East Policy

Amid chants of “death to America,” “death to England,” and “death to Israel,” Khamenei accused Trump of deceit in his Middle East peace efforts. He dismissed Trump’s claims of fostering stability, alleging instead that U.S. actions fuel chaos.

“Some of the things the U.S. president said in his recent visit to the region are not even worthy of a response,” Khamenei declared in a video translated by the Washington D.C.-based Middle East Media Research Institute. “Trump said that he wanted to use power for peace. He is lying.”

Khamenei’s rhetoric reflects deep-seated distrust of American intentions, particularly as Trump’s administration has prioritized a hardline stance against Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The supreme leader also labeled Israel a “cancerous tumor” that must be “uprooted,” intensifying the inflammatory tone of his speech.

Yet, Trump’s recent Middle East tour, which secured nearly $2 trillion in trade and investment deals, signals a counterapproach—one that leverages economic might and regional alliances to stabilize the region and counter Iran’s influence.

Iran’s Defiance and Trump’s Strategic Push

Khamenei further accused Trump and U.S. officials of using power to “perpetrate a massacre in Gaza” and “stir up war” while supporting “mercenaries.”

He questioned, “When have they ever used power for peace?” In response, he vowed that Iran would bolster its own strength, stating, “Indeed, one can use power for peace and security. This is why we will increase our power and the power of our country every day whether the enemies like it or not, inshallah.” This pledge underscores Iran’s determination to resist U.S. pressure, even as diplomatic talks continue.

On the American side, Trump’s leadership has reinvigorated efforts to prevent Iran from achieving nuclear capabilities. U.S. Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff, appearing on ABC’s *This Week*, emphasized an uncompromising stance: “We have one very, very clear red line, and that is enrichment. We cannot allow even 1% of an enrichment capability.”

Witkoff’s remarks highlight Trump’s commitment to ensuring Iran cannot weaponize nuclear technology, a policy that aligns with his broader goal of restoring American strength and influence in global affairs.

A Complex Diplomatic Dance

Khamenei’s provocative words and the crowd’s chants, including “death to those who oppose the rule of the Jurisprudent,” reveal the ideological chasm between Iran’s theocratic regime and the U.S. vision for the Middle East. The reference to Islamic law underscores the regime’s rigid governance, which clashes with Trump’s pragmatic, deal-driven approach.

While Khamenei calls for U.S. withdrawal from the region, Trump’s recent successes—forging historic agreements and rallying Arab nations against Iran’s aggression—demonstrate a renewed American resolve.

The Trump administration’s negotiations with Iran remain a high-stakes endeavor. By drawing a firm line against nuclear enrichment, the U.S. signals that it will not waver in protecting its allies and global security.

Trump’s ability to blend economic incentives with unwavering strength offers a refreshing contrast to past administrations’ wavering policies. As tensions simmer, the world watches whether diplomacy or defiance will shape the future of U.S.-Iran relations.

Pope Leo XIV surprised JD Vance with an offer he couldn’t refuse

With a new leader in the Catholic Church, many are curious how he’ll handle foreign affairs. Now we can say confidently that it will look a lot different than before.

Because Pope Leo XIV surprised JD Vance with an offer he couldn’t refuse.

On May 19, 2025, U.S. Vice President JD Vance met with Pope Leo XIV at the Vatican, a significant encounter amid a surge of U.S.-led diplomatic efforts to secure a ceasefire in Russia’s war in Ukraine.

The meeting, attended by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, underscored shared Catholic values and a mutual commitment to peace. This pivotal moment is explored through three key angles: the diplomatic context of the Vatican meeting, the personal and ideological dynamics between Vance and Leo, and the broader U.S.-Vatican collaboration on global conflicts.

Diplomatic Context of the Vatican Meeting

Vance, leading the U.S. delegation to Pope Leo XIV’s inaugural Mass on May 18, met the pontiff the following day as part of a flurry of diplomatic engagements.

“There was an exchange of views on some current international issues, calling for respect for humanitarian law and international law in areas of conflict and for a negotiated solution between the parties involved,” a Vatican statement noted.

The Vatican, sidelined in the first three years of Russia’s invasion, has offered to host peace talks and continues humanitarian efforts, such as prisoner swaps and reuniting Ukrainian children.

Vance’s Sunday meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, followed by President Trump’s planned calls with Vladimir Putin and Zelenskyy on Monday, reflect a concerted U.S. push for a ceasefire, with the Vatican as a key ally.

Personal and Ideological Dynamics

Both Vance, a Catholic convert since 2019, and Pope Leo XIV, the first American pope and former Cardinal Robert Prevost, share a Catholic identity but have clashed on policy.

Before his May 8 election, Leo shared X posts critical of the Trump administration’s mass deportation plans, a stance echoing Pope Francis’s focus on migrants and the poor.

Vance, one of the last officials to meet Francis before his April 21 death, faced public rebukes from the late pope over migration, with Francis correcting Vance’s theological defense of deportations.

Despite this, Vance expressed pride in Leo, saying Sunday, “The United States was very proud of him,” and gifted him a Chicago Bears jersey emblazoned with “Pope Leo XIV.” The 45-minute audience, joined by Rubio, also a Catholic, highlighted a desire to align on peace efforts while navigating past tensions.

U.S.-Vatican Collaboration on Global Conflicts

The meeting signals a reset in U.S.-Vatican relations, with the Trump administration seeking to leverage Leo’s peace advocacy. Leo, a Chicago-born missionary who served in Chiclayo, Peru, has vowed “every effort” to end the Ukraine conflict, a commitment he reiterated at his inaugural Mass, calling for peace in Ukraine, Gaza, and Myanmar.

Vance’s aide cited his National Catholic Prayer Breakfast remarks, stating, “Where I think President Trump’s policy is most in accord with Christian social teaching and with the Catholic faith is that more than any president of my lifetime, President Trump has pursued a path of peace.”

The Vatican’s offer to mediate, backed by Secretary of State Pietro Parolin’s suggestion to host direct talks, aligns with U.S. initiatives, including recent ceasefire brokering between India and Pakistan, which Leo “welcomed with satisfaction.”

This collaboration aims to bolster Trump’s “peacemaker” vision amid ongoing global crises.

Biden came back to haunt Democrats in the worst possible way

Joe Biden should take a hint and fade into the background. Instead he’s making it all about him again.

Now he came back to haunt Democrats in the worst possible way.

Potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidates are navigating a minefield of questions about former President Joe Biden’s cognitive health and his decision to run for re-election in 2024, as they take early steps in the White House race.

The scrutiny, fueled by a new book and Biden’s faltering 2024 campaign, is testing the candor of figures like Pete Buttigieg.

This dynamic is explored through three lenses: the persistent questions about Biden’s decline, the varied responses from contenders, and the Democratic Party’s struggle to move forward.

Persistent Questions About Biden’s Decline

At a recent Iowa town hall, Pete Buttigieg faced pointed questions about Biden’s cognitive state during his presidency. “Did President Joe Biden experience cognitive decline while in office?” a reporter asked. Buttigieg, Biden’s former Transportation Secretary, replied, “Every time I needed something from him from the West Wing, I got it.”

A follow-up question probed whether Democrats would have fared better had Biden not run, to which he admitted, “Maybe. Right now, with the benefit of hindsight, I think most people would agree that that’s the case.”

These queries, amplified by *Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again*, reflect voter concerns about a perceived White House cover-up, especially after Biden’s disastrous June 2024 debate with Donald Trump led to his withdrawal.

Varied Responses from 2028 Contenders

Democratic hopefuls are grappling with how to address Biden’s tenure, with responses shaped by their proximity to him.

Rep. Ro Khanna, a 2024 Biden surrogate, wrote, “To rebuild trust, Democrats must be honest. In light of the facts that have come out, Joe Biden should not have run for reelection, and we should have had an open primary.”

He added, “But obviously we did not have the full picture, and in hindsight it is painfully obvious that President Biden should have made the patriotic decision not to run.” Senator Chris Murphy told Politico, “There’s no doubt about it,” regarding Biden’s decline, and said, “I mean, isn’t that self-evident? We lost,” lamenting the party’s 2024 strategy.

Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, however, distanced herself, saying on CNN, “I didn’t see the president frequently,” but admitted, “It does make me question a lot of the things I thought I knew over the last year and a half.”

Democratic Party’s Struggle to Move Forward

The grilling of potential 2028 contenders underscores the Democratic Party’s challenge to process its 2024 losses—Kamala Harris’s defeat, the Senate’s fall, and failure to reclaim the House—while addressing Biden’s legacy.

New Hampshire radio host Chris Ryan noted, “The Democratic voters are still trying to sort through what happened and why.”

The varied responses highlight a tension between honesty and political caution, with Ryan observing that voters value “truthfulness” on Biden’s fitness. Buttigieg emphasized the need to pivot, stating, “We’re not in a position to wallow in hindsight.

We’ve got to get ready for some fundamental tests of the future of this country and this party.” As Democrats confront these questions, their ability to balance accountability with forward momentum will shape the party’s path toward 2028.

RFK Jr. admitted one shocking truth about the COVID vaccine that is making waves

Big Pharma wanted to keep this under wraps. But the truth has been revealed.

Now RFK Jr. admitted one shocking truth about the COVID vaccine that is making waves.

The Independent Medical Alliance (IMA) has launched Smart Moms Ask, a national parental rights campaign urging the federal government to remove the COVID mRNA vaccine from the childhood immunization schedule, tapping into the same grassroots energy that secured Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s confirmation as Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary.

This movement, driven by concerns over vaccine safety, is gaining traction amid shifting federal health policy.

The campaign is explored through three critical perspectives: the grassroots push for policy change, emerging skepticism from health officials, and the cited risks fueling parental concerns.

Grassroots Push for Policy Change

The Smart Moms Ask campaign, spearheaded by IMA, demands that HHS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “stop mRNA COVID shots for kids and pregnant women” and remove them from the childhood vaccine schedule.

Dr. Kat Lindley, IMA Fellowship Program Director, declared, “Moms are the fiercest protectors of their children, yet they’ve been bullied into accepting mRNA shots with devastating risks.”

The campaign’s petition invites Americans to join this call, echoing the activism that propelled Kennedy’s HHS confirmation.

In 2022, Kennedy criticized the CDC’s decision to add the mRNA shots to the childhood schedule as a “reckless action,” accusing the agency of prioritizing “pharma overlords” over “child welfare.”

This grassroots effort seeks to reverse that decision, amplifying parental voices in a charged health policy debate.

Emerging Skepticism from Health Officials

Recent statements from FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary bolster the campaign’s case, as he questioned the necessity of mRNA COVID shots for healthy children. During an interview with Charlie Kirk, Makary stated, “Look, I’d love to see the evidence to show that giving young, healthy children another COVID shot – you know, a sixth COVID booster – would help them,” but asserted, “that evidence does not exist.”

He noted that other countries, particularly in Europe, have already recommended against vaccinating young, healthy children, and predicted an upcoming U.S. policy shift, saying, “I think you’re going to see some announcement on that in the coming weeks.”

Makary’s acknowledgment that “there’s no good randomized control data” for the latest vaccine formulation signals a potential reevaluation at the federal level, aligning with the campaign’s demands.

Cited Risks Fueling Parental Concerns

The Smart Moms Ask campaign cites alarming statistics from peer-reviewed studies to justify its push, highlighting risks to children and pregnant women. According to the campaign, 9.5 million U.S. children aged 6 months to 17 years have received the mRNA shot as of April 19, 2025.

It points to a 620% increase in myocarditis among young men post-vaccination, miscarriage rates as high as 81% in a Pfizer Patient Safety study (compared to a 13% average), and a 33% lower successful conception rate for vaccinated women in 2022.

“The risks are real, and parents deserve the truth,” the campaign asserts, drawing on IMA’s expertise as the former Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance. These figures, paired with Kennedy’s prior condemnation of the CDC’s 2022 decision, fuel parental distrust and drive the campaign’s urgency to protect vulnerable populations from what it calls “devastating risks.”

A standing ovation for Trump overseas has sent Democrats into hysterics

The Left pretends Trump embarrasses this nation. But now other countries respect us.

And a standing ovation for Trump overseas has sent Democrats into hysterics

At the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum 2025, President Donald Trump delivered a pivotal speech on May 13, heralding a new era in U.S.-Saudi relations and earning a standing ovation.

His address celebrated Saudi Arabia’s transformation and reinforced a historic partnership, signaling a robust strategic alliance.

This moment is explored through three key perspectives: the reaffirmation of bilateral ties, praise for Saudi Arabia’s self-driven progress, and a call for regional diplomatic expansion.

Reaffirming a Historic Partnership

Trump emphasized the enduring bond between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, rooted in the 1945 USS Quincy meeting between President Franklin Roosevelt and King Abdul Aziz.

“With this historic state visit, we celebrate more than 80 years of close partnership between the United States and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” he declared, adding, “Today, we reaffirm this important bond, and we take the next steps to make our relationship closer, stronger, and more powerful than ever before.”

His remarks underscored a commitment to deepen ties, with a vision for collaboration that transcends past challenges.

Trump’s assertion that the relationship is “more powerful than ever before” reflects a renewed alignment, bolstered by shared economic and geopolitical interests.

Celebrating Saudi Arabia’s Self-Driven Progress

The president lauded the transformative reforms led by King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, describing them as “truly extraordinary.”

He marveled at Saudi Arabia’s architectural and developmental strides, stating, “The majestic skyscrapers, the towers that I see, the difference between now and eight years ago — and eight years ago was very impressive.”

Trump highlighted that this progress stems from local ingenuity, not foreign intervention, saying, “No, the gleaming marvels of Riyadh and Abu Dhabi were not created by the so-called nation-builders, neocons, or liberal nonprofits like those who spent trillions and trillions of dollars failing to develop Kabul, Baghdad,media, so many other cities.”

This emphasis on Saudi self-reliance celebrates the kingdom’s sovereignty and vision, distinguishing it from failed Western-led projects.

Advocating for Regional Diplomacy

Trump concluded his speech with a bold call for Saudi Arabia to join the Abraham Accords, a move he deemed critical for Middle Eastern stability.

This invitation aligns with his broader vision for regional cooperation, building on the accords’ framework to foster peace and economic ties. He framed the U.S.-Saudi alliance as a foundation for mutual success, stating, “We will work together. We will be together. We will succeed together. We will win together. And we will always be friends.”

The proposal underscores Trump’s ambition to expand diplomatic normalization in the region, leveraging the strengthened U.S.-Saudi partnership to promote broader geopolitical alignment and prosperity.

Sobering test result puts the Democrat Party on the backfoot

The Left is crumbling. And the bad news just keeps coming.

Now a sobering test result put the Democrat Party on the backfoot.

Democrats Grapple with Declining Confidence

A recent poll conducted by the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research from May 1-5, 2025, highlights a sharp decline in Democratic voter optimism, with only one-third of Democrats feeling “very” or “somewhat” optimistic about their party’s future.

This marks a significant drop from nearly 60% in July 2024, reflecting the fallout from the party’s substantial losses in the November 2024 elections, where Democrats ceded control of the White House and both chambers of Congress.

The findings underscore challenges for Democrats as they navigate internal divisions and a shifting political landscape, contrasting with the robust leadership of President Donald Trump and the GOP.

Monica Brown, a 61-year-old Democrat from Tennessee, voiced frustration with the party’s direction, stating, “I just feel like the majority of the old Democratic Party needs to go. They’re not in tune with the new generation. They’re not in tune with the new world. We’ve got such division within the party.”

Her sentiment captures a broader unease among Democrats, who are struggling to redefine their identity in the face of GOP dominance under Trump’s agenda.

GOP Surges as Democrats Falter

In stark contrast, Republican voters are riding a wave of confidence, with 55% expressing optimism about the GOP’s future, up from 47% in July 2024, according to the same AP-NORC poll.

This surge aligns with Trump’s successful return to the presidency and the party’s unified push to advance his policies.

Among GOP leaders, Secretary of State Marco Rubio leads with 60% favorability among Republicans, while House Speaker Mike Johnson and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth each garner about 50% support within the party and 25% among the broader public, reflecting Trump’s ability to elevate trusted allies.

On the Democratic side, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has seen his favorability plummet from 50% last December to just one-third today, largely due to his controversial March 2025 decision to support a Republican-led funding bill, which alienated many in his party.

Meanwhile, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) maintains a 50% favorability rating among Democrats, and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) enjoys strong support at 75%, signaling a preference for progressive voices amid the party’s struggles.

Broader Discontent with the Political System

The poll also reveals growing disillusionment with the political process, particularly among Democrats. A majority, 55%, now express pessimism about how political leaders are selected, up from 46% last summer.

This mirrors broader public sentiment, with only 33% of Americans viewing the Democratic Party favorably compared to 40% for the Republican Party. A separate Washington Post/ABC News poll from April 2025 reinforces this frustration, finding that 69% of Americans see the Democratic Party as “out of touch,” while 64% say the same of the GOP.

Trump’s leadership, by contrast, has capitalized on public demand for decisive action, positioning the GOP as a more cohesive force.

As Democrats grapple with internal strife and a lack of clear direction, the AP-NORC poll suggests that the party faces an uphill battle to regain voter trust, while Trump’s GOP continues to consolidate its gains.

Democrat Senator’s jaw-dropping confession left everyone in shock

The truth always comes to light. But will anyone be punished?

Because a Democrat Senator’s jaw-dropping confession left everyone in shock.

Murphy Questions Biden’s Cognitive Capacity

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) has openly acknowledged concerns about President Joe Biden’s cognitive health during his time in the White House, a stance that aligns with President Donald Trump’s frequent critiques of Biden’s leadership.

In an interview with Politico, Murphy addressed Biden’s mental acuity, stating, “There’s no doubt about it,” when asked if Biden experienced cognitive decline while serving as president.

He qualified his remark, adding, “The debate is whether it was enough that it compromised his ability to act as chief executive.” This admission fuels Trump’s narrative that Biden was unfit to lead, reinforcing the case for strong, decisive leadership.

Murphy’s office did not respond to Fox News Digital’s request for further comment, leaving his statement to stand as a rare moment of candor from a Democrat. The senator’s remarks come amid ongoing scrutiny of Biden’s performance, which Trump and his supporters have long highlighted as a liability for the nation.

Biden Defends His Record Amid Doubts

Biden, for his part, has rejected claims of significant cognitive decline. During an appearance on The View last week, he pushed back against such narratives, emphasizing his ability to serve effectively in his final year as president.

Fox News Digital reached out to the Office of Joe and Jill Biden for comment but received no response by publication time. Trump’s camp, however, has consistently pointed to Biden’s public appearances as evidence of diminished capacity, contrasting it with Trump’s energetic leadership style.

Murphy’s earlier comments, made during a CNN interview before Biden exited the 2024 presidential race, reflect a more cautious tone.

He noted that Biden’s debate performance “raised questions for voters” about whether he was “still the old Joe Biden.” Murphy urged Biden to “show the country that he is still the old Joe Biden,” taking the president “at his word” that he remained capable.

He praised Biden’s legislative record, stating, “I have seen him do this job at an absolutely exceptional level. No president has had this level of legislative accomplishment in their first four years as Joe Biden.” Yet, these assurances now seem overshadowed by Murphy’s recent acknowledgment of Biden’s decline.

Democratic Regrets Over 2024 Strategy

Reflecting on the Democrats’ 2024 election loss, Murphy suggested to Politico that Biden’s decision to run was a misstep. “I mean, isn’t that self-evident? We lost,” he said.

“Obviously, in retrospect, we should have done something different. The likelihood is the odds were pretty stacked against us no matter what, but clearly people were looking for change and neither Biden nor Harris were going to be able to offer a real message of change.”

This critique bolsters Trump’s argument that the American people sought a fresh, dynamic leader, a role he positioned himself to fill.

Murphy’s hindsight underscores the challenges Democrats faced in rallying behind Biden, whose perceived weaknesses were a focal point of Trump’s campaign.

As Trump continues to champion a vision of renewed strength and clarity in leadership, Murphy’s comments inadvertently lend credence to the case for a change in direction that Trump represents.

Twenty states teamed up to hand the Trump admin a huge lawsuit

Love it or hate it, Democrats are better at organizing than Republicans. And now they’ve cooked up something big.

Because twenty states teamed up to hand the Trump admin a huge lawsuit.

States Challenge Trump’s Funding Threats Over Immigration Policy

A coalition of 20 Democratic-leaning states has launched a legal offensive against the Trump administration, contesting its threats to cut federal funding from jurisdictions that resist its immigration enforcement policies.

The lawsuits, filed in Rhode Island, reflect a bold stand against what the states call an overreach of executive power, while the Trump administration argues it’s taking necessary steps to ensure compliance with federal law.

Last month, President Donald Trump signed executive orders instructing federal agencies to identify “sanctuary cities” that fail to align with his immigration agenda. The orders warn that noncompliant states or cities “may lose federal funding,” a move the administration defends as critical to upholding national security and immigration laws.

The coalition, led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, contends that this approach is both unconstitutional and a misuse of federal authority.

California Leads Legal Pushback

Bonta, spearheading the effort, filed two lawsuits challenging the executive orders.

“Let’s be clear about what’s happening here: The President is threatening to yank funds to improve our roads, keep our planes in the air, prepare for emergencies, and protect against terrorist attacks if states do not fall in line with his demands. He’s treating these funds, which have nothing to do with immigration enforcement and everything to do with the safety of our communities, as a bargaining chip,” Bonta said in a statement.

He argued that Trump lacks “the authority to unlawfully coerce state and local governments into using their resources for federal immigration enforcement — and his latest attempt to bully them into doing so is blatantly illegal.”

The first lawsuit targets the Department of Homeland Security, Secretary Kristi Noem, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, asserting that the administration’s funding conditions violate the Constitution, as Congress has already allocated the funds for specific purposes.

The second lawsuit, directed at the Department of Transportation and Secretary Sean Duffy, makes a parallel case, focusing on the potential loss of funding for vital infrastructure projects. The Trump administration, however, views these measures as essential to compel cooperation from states that, in its view, undermine federal immigration efforts.

Broader Implications for State Autonomy

The coalition, which includes California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin, frames the lawsuits as a defense against encroaching federal overreach. Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha stated, “We are experiencing creeping authoritarianism in this country, and as a people we must continue to resist.”

He added, “Using the safety of Americans as collateral, the Trump Administration is once again illegally subverting the Congress, bullying the states to relinquish their right, ensured by the Constitution, to enact policies and laws that best serve their residents.”

While most coalition states have Democratic governors and attorneys general, Nevada and Vermont, with Republican governors, also joined, signaling broader concerns about federal overreach.

Supporters of Trump’s policies argue that the administration is rightfully prioritizing national security and public safety by holding sanctuary jurisdictions accountable, ensuring that federal resources support communities that uphold the rule of law.

Gavin Newsom betrays the Democrat Party with this shocking order

The Democrats are in an uproar. Their biggest names are shedding the party.

And now Gavin Newsom betrayed the Democrat Party with this shocking order

Newsom Pushes for Homeless Encampment Bans Across California

On Monday, California Governor Gavin Newsom called on cities and counties statewide to prohibit homeless encampments on public spaces like sidewalks and bike paths, intensifying efforts to tackle the escalating crisis. His administration introduced a model ordinance for local governments to adopt, designed to clear encampments and restore public access.

The proposed ordinance bans camping for more than three days, establishing semi-permanent shelters, or obstructing pathways. It requires cities to make “every reasonable effort” to provide shelter or housing options and give at least 48 hours’ notice before dismantling encampments.

This approach diverges from traditional liberal policies, which have focused on housing and treatment rather than penalizing homelessness. “There’s nothing compassionate about letting people die on the streets,” Newsom declared. “Local leaders wanted resources—we provided historic state funding. They needed legal clarity—the courts delivered. Now, we’re offering a ready-to-use model to act swiftly, humanely, and connect people to shelter, housing, and care. The era of excuses is over.”

State Incentives and Local Challenges

While the ordinance is optional, Newsom is encouraging compliance with $3.3 billion in funding from a $6.4 billion state bond, approved by voters in 2024, to expand housing and treatment facilities for those with severe mental health and addiction issues.

Newsom, a former San Francisco mayor and potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, is addressing a traditionally local issue. Since 2019, his statewide homelessness initiatives have struggled, with a 2024 audit revealing $24 billion spent over five years with little progress. Newsom has criticized local leaders for their inaction.

“Tents and encampments cannot become a way of life,” he stated at a Monday press conference.

“Permanent structures blocking sidewalks, hindering kids, seniors, and people with disabilities from moving freely—it’s unacceptable. Last year, we raised the bar for local plans, and we’re working with the legislature to push further.”

The model ordinance allows cities to set their own penalties, offering enforcement flexibility. In the Bay Area, funding will support new addiction treatment centers in Oakland and San Jose, a skilled nursing facility in Napa, and a mental health clinic in San Rafael.

San Francisco, long plagued by homelessness, will receive $27 million for 73 treatment beds. Mayor Daniel Lurie called it a “strong first step” to expand services. Despite pledging 1,500 shelter beds in six months during his campaign, Lurie has not met this target but plans to open 300 by summer’s end.

With 3,200 shelter beds, San Francisco still cannot accommodate its over 6,400 homeless residents.

Oakland faces a graver situation, with 3,500 unsheltered individuals and only 1,300 temporary beds. San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan has proposed arrests for those refusing shelter three times, prioritizing street clearance. In Los Angeles, Mayor Karen Bass continues to focus on encampment removal, though the city’s 45,000 homeless population remains a public health crisis.

California’s Homelessness Crisis and Opposition

California accounts for half of the nation’s unsheltered homeless, with 187,000 people recorded in 2024, two-thirds living on streets or in tents, cars, and parks, according to the Public Policy Institute of California.

Not everyone supports Newsom’s plan. “Sadly, Newsom and others are relying on outdated tactics,” said Jesse Rabinowitz of the National Homelessness Law Center. “We’ll keep advocating for real solutions like housing and services.”

Mike Posner, a homeless man who moved to San Francisco during the pandemic, questioned the plan’s viability. “It’ll never happen here,” he told the Washington Examiner. “If it does, I’ll head to LA. No big deal.”

Chuck Schumer throws a massive wrench in Trump’s plans that changes everything

Schumer and Trump are at each other’s throats. And they aren’t pulling any punches.

Now Chuck Schumer threw a massive wrench in Trump’s plans that changes everything.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer declared Tuesday that he’s slamming the brakes on all Department of Justice political nominees, insisting on transparency from President Trump’s administration regarding a lavish jumbo jet gifted by Qatar’s royal family.

The Democrat labeled the deal a “serious national security concern” that demands immediate scrutiny.

“Reports of Qatar handing President Trump a $400 million private jet to serve as Air Force One reek of corruption so blatant it would make even the most seasoned autocrat blink,” Schumer charged on the Senate floor.

“This isn’t just an ethical lapse—it’s a potential threat to our nation’s security.”

Citing the “alarming” possibility of a Qatari-funded Air Force One and claims that Attorney General Pam Bondi personally greenlit the deal, Schumer announced, “Until we get clear answers, I’m putting a hold on every DOJ political nominee.”

A White House spokesperson fired back to Fox News Digital, accusing Schumer and his “soft-on-crime allies” of playing political games at the expense of critical DOJ appointments.

“Senator Schumer’s obstruction undermines President Trump’s mission to Make America Safe Again. Cryin’ Chuck needs to drop the theatrics, stop stalling the Senate, and put the safety and rights of Americans first,” the spokesperson said.

President Trump has justified accepting the Boeing 747-8 from Qatar’s royals as a stopgap measure, pointing to Boeing’s delays in delivering a new Air Force One fleet.

“Boeing’s taking forever to build a new Air Force One,” Trump remarked Monday. “Our current plane is 40 years old. Compared to what a modern equivalent should be, it’s not even in the same league.”

News broke Sunday that the Trump administration plans to use the $400 million jet temporarily, with ABC News reporting it will later be donated to Trump’s presidential library.

Schumer, in his Tuesday address, demanded that the Justice Department’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) Unit reveal all actions by Qatari agents in the U.S. that might benefit Trump or his businesses.

“Under Attorney General Bondi, the DOJ has dropped the ball on FARA enforcement,” he said. “The public deserves to know about every deal involving President Trump, his family, or the Trump Organization—not just this jet, but all Middle East transactions.”

Schumer pressed further:

“President Trump calls this a ‘free jet.’ Is it fully equipped with security measures from day one? If so, who installed them, and how can we trust they’re secure? Why risk relying on a foreign government for such sensitive work? If not, what modifications are needed to make this plane safe, and will Qatar foot the bill, or will American taxpayers be stuck with the cost?”

He concluded by calling for Bondi to testify before Congress to clarify why the jet deal doesn’t violate the Constitution’s emoluments clause or ethics laws.

“Until the Attorney General justifies this questionable decision and we get full answers, I’ll block all DOJ political nominees,” Schumer vowed.

Jen Psaki humiliates MSNBC with a harebrained monologue

Psaki wishes she had her old job as press secretary back. Now it’s just embarrassing.

Now Jen Psaki humiliated MSNBC with a harebrained monologue.

Psaki’s Playful Jab at Trump’s Press Team

On Friday’s episode of MSNBC’s “The Briefing,” host Jen Psaki, a former White House press secretary, took a cheeky swipe at current press secretary Karoline Leavitt by staging her own mock White House briefing.

With a tongue-in-cheek setup, Psaki promised to tackle real press questions without the “MAGA spin” she sees dominating the current administration’s responses. “I have noticed the White House briefing room has taken a bit of a bizarro turn lately,” she quipped.

“And I figured, what the hell, it’s a Friday night. Why not dust off the cobwebs and field a few questions from the White House press briefing room today? Because it’s been a while.”

Using a faux briefing room backdrop, Psaki fielded actual questions from Friday’s real briefing, offering her unfiltered takes.

Her approach blended humor with pointed critique, aiming to contrast her straightforward style with what she views as the Trump team’s evasive tactics.

Eric Adams is visiting because he owes his current freedom to the guy sitting in the White House. Let’s stop pretending this is on the level, like where the relationship is between a president and a New York City mayor just coordinating city business in a normal course of events.

I mean, even the judge who allowed the case to be dropped said that it, quote, smacks of a bargain.

Digging into Trump’s Decisions: Adams and Hayden

Psaki didn’t hold back when addressing a question from the New York Post’s Steven Nelsen about New York City Mayor Eric Adams’ White House visit.

She suggested the meeting was less about routine city business and more about political favors, noting, “Let’s stop pretending this is on the level.” Psaki pointed to a judge’s remark that the dismissal of a case against Adams “smacks of a bargain,” implying a deeper connection to Trump’s influence.

She also tackled the abrupt firing of Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden, a Black woman appointed in 2016 with strong bipartisan Senate support. Psaki hinted at possible racial motivations, saying, “I’ll let you draw your own conclusions on why Trump and his administration decided to fire Carla Hayden.”

Displaying a photo of Hayden as a “visual aid,” she left the implication hanging, urging viewers to question the administration’s motives.

“The Briefing” Faces Viewership Rollercoaster

Psaki’s new show, “The Briefing,” claimed MSNBC’s prime 9 p.m. ET slot from Tuesday through Friday, debuting to 1.2 million viewers and 139,000 in the key 25-54 demographic.

However, the program’s second episode on Wednesday saw a sharp decline, dipping to just over one million total viewers and a mere 65,000 in the demo—a 53% drop. The 18-49 age group was hit even harder, plummeting 67% from 113,000 to 37,000 viewers.

Despite the rocky start, Psaki’s bold style and insider perspective continue to stir conversation, even as she navigates the challenges of retaining a prime-time audience.

Catholics take on Democrat Governor for this egregious assault on the First Amendment

The divide in America is getting larger. And now the fight is heating up.

Because Catholics took on a Democrat Governor for this egregious assault on the First Amendment

Catholic Clergy Condemn New Washington Law

On May 6, the Confraternity of Catholic Clergy, a national association of priests and deacons, publicly denounced a Washington state law, signed into effect on May 2 by Governor Bob Ferguson, that mandates priests to break the seal of confession when child s*x abuse is disclosed during the sacrament.

The confraternity labeled the legislation a direct assault on religious freedom, arguing that it unconstitutionally compels clergy to violate sacred Catholic doctrine.

The law, according to CatholicVote, explicitly strips legal protections for the confidentiality of the confessional in cases involving abuse, while leaving physician-patient and lawyer-client privileges untouched.

“Criminal prosecution must rely on constitutional methods to convict rather than violate the freedom of religion,” stated Rev. John Trigilio, President of the Confraternity, emphasizing the law’s threat to the First Amendment.

Balancing Child Protection and Sacramental Integrity

The Confraternity’s statement reaffirmed its dual commitment to safeguarding children and preserving the sanctity of the sacraments, asserting that these goals are not mutually exclusive.

Priests who refuse to disclose confessional content related to suspected child s*x abuse face imprisonment under the new law, as well as automatic excommunication from the Catholic Church for violating the seal.

“We encourage penitents to voluntarily report crimes to proper authorities, while maintaining the sacred and inviolable seal of confession,” the Confraternity declared.

“It is not a question of either/or, as if the state must choose between defending children or respecting religion. It has been and can continue to be both/and. Neither obligation should be in jeopardy.”

This stance underscores the group’s call for solutions that respect both legal accountability and religious principles.

Broader Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Archbishop Paul D. Etienne of Seattle also condemned the law on May 4, invoking biblical precedent to underscore the Church’s position.

“After the apostles were arrested and thrown into jail for preaching the name of Jesus Christ, St. Peter responds to the Sanhedrin: ‘We must obey God rather than men’ (Acts 5:29). This is our stance now in the face of this new law,” he wrote.

Etienne stressed that Catholic clergy are bound by Church law to uphold the confidentiality of confessions, assuring Catholics that their sacramental privacy remains “sacred, secure, confidential and protected.”

The U.S. Department of Justice has launched a civil rights investigation into the law, citing potential violations of the First Amendment.

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division stated, “SB 5375 demands that Catholic Priests violate their deeply held faith in order to obey the law, a violation of the Constitution and a breach of the free exercise of religion cannot stand under our Constitutional system of government.”

She further criticized the law for disproportionately targeting clergy, noting, “Worse, the law appears to single out clergy as not entitled to assert applicable privileges, as compared to other reporting professionals.”

The DOJ expressed its intent to pursue the matter rigorously, expecting cooperation from Washington state.