After Trump was almost assassinated, Radicals across the country have come out of hiding to try their hand at political violence. But this recent incident highlights just how bad things are.

Because a Trump supporter was just attacked as part of a terrifying string of anti-Trump violence.

In a recent tragic incident, an 80-year-old man in Michigan was critically injured after being run over by an ATV driver while putting up a sign in support of Donald Trump. The suspect, identified as a 22-year-old male, later took his own life, leaving a community grappling with the aftermath of a politically motivated attack. This horrific event highlights the escalating political violence in America.

The Houghton County Sheriff’s Office reported that the incident occurred on Sunday evening in the 1600 block of Anthony Street in Hancock.

The elderly victim was setting up Trump signs in his yard when the suspect, driving an ATV, intentionally ran him over.

According to police reports, the driver had first removed the signs, and when the victim attempted to replace them, the suspect used the ATV as a weapon.

Following the attack, the Hancock City Police Department received a message from the suspect’s address.

The individual confessed to the crime involving the ATV and requested police presence. Officers arrived to find the 22-year-old suspect deceased from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

“The Hancock City Police Department had received a message from an individual at that address who had stated that they want to ‘confess a crime involving an ATV driver within the last 24 hours’, and further to ‘send someone to pick me up’. Officers and Deputies arrived on scene and discovered a 22-year-old male suspect on scene. The male individual was found deceased with a single self-inflicted gunshot wound,” stated the Houghton County Sheriff’s press release.

The press release emphasized that the crimes were politically motivated. “The crimes reported in the city of Hancock appear to be politically motivated, involving victims who displayed Trump election signs as well as law enforcement appreciation stickers and flags commonly referred to as ‘thin blue line’ paraphernalia,” it read.

The Hancock Police had already been responding to multiple incidents involving the same suspect. Earlier, there were reports of vandalism where tire valves were broken off and windows smashed. Hancock Police Chief Tami Sleeman described the sequence of events:

“Around 4:45 pm, we had reports of vandalism to two vehicles where the tire valves were broken off and another one, they had smashed all the windows out and tried to do the same [act]…with the vehicle tires.”

The situation escalated when the suspect targeted the elderly man for his political display. “At approximately 5:45 PM, in the 1600 blk of Anthony Street, the same subject driving an ATV (4-wheel) allegedly with intention to do harm drove into the residence yard, running over an 80-year-old male who was posting a political sign in his yard. The victim was transported to the hospital with serious injuries and remains in critical condition,” the press release continued.

The community is reeling from this act of violence, and the police are urging anyone with additional information to come forward. “We’re not sure what could happen. Could he die from these injuries? Possible,” Chief Sleeman noted with evident concern.

“If there’s anybody out there that has any information on the person driving this four-wheeler, please call the Hancock Police Department.”

The incident has sparked widespread outrage and fear among local residents, especially those who openly display their political affiliations.

The attack on an elderly man for his political beliefs is seen as a disturbing indication of the heightened tensions and intolerance that have been escalating across the country.

This brutal attack on a Trump supporter not only highlights the extreme political divisions but also underscores the urgent need for unity and respect for differing viewpoints.

It is a grim reminder of the potential consequences of political hatred and the importance of safeguarding the right to free speech and political expression.

As the investigation continues, the community of Hancock and the nation at large must confront the rising tide of politically motivated violence.

This tragic incident serves as a wake-up call to all Americans to stand against such acts of hate and work towards a more tolerant and peaceful society.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Since Biden announced he would step aside as the Democrat nominee, many Americans worry about his ability to lead the nation. And now, that worry has developed into something serious.

And the newest Biden development includes the 25th Amendment and the nation is shocked.

In a bold move reflecting growing concerns within the Republican Party and beyond, Senator Eric Schmitt (R-MO) has demanded that President Joe Biden’s cabinet members and Vice President Kamala Harris invoke the 25th Amendment to remove Biden from the presidency.

This call to action, articulated in a letter released online on Monday, underscores the intensifying scrutiny over Biden’s capacity to lead following his recent announcement to step down from the 2024 presidential race.

🚨Today I’m demanding the Biden Harris cabinet invoke the 25th Amendment.

If Biden isn’t capable of being a candidate, he’s not capable of being President.

My letter to VP Harris and the Biden Harris cabinet members. pic.twitter.com/woqh3JDAdJ

— Eric Schmitt (@Eric_Schmitt) July 22, 2024

Senator Schmitt’s letter, dated July 21, 2024, came in the wake of Biden’s unexpected decision to withdraw from seeking the Democratic nomination for the presidency.

Schmitt’s letter highlights a sentiment long held by many in conservative circles: “Yesterday, July 21, 2024, President Biden announced he would no longer seek the Democratic Party’s nomination for the Presidency. This decision came after a weeks-long pressure campaign by the Democrat elite to push out President Biden following the first Presidential Debate—where those party elites’ dirty secret was unveiled, a truth those of us in Real America had known for years.”

Schmitt did not mince words in his assessment of Biden’s capability: “President Biden is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, including, but not limited to, his ability to serve as the Commander in Chief of our armed forces.”

“If President Biden is willing to admit he is unable to continue to stand as the Democratic Party nominee for President after the primary process due to his health, he is unable to continue to serve as President until January 20, 2025,” he added.

Senator Schmitt’s demand is the latest in a series of Republican calls for Biden’s resignation or removal from office. Following Biden’s withdrawal from the presidential race on Sunday, there has been a concerted effort among conservative politicians to question his fitness to continue his term.

Schmitt’s argument rests on the premise that Biden’s inability to pursue re-election due to health concerns inherently disqualifies him from continuing his current term.

This demand comes amidst Biden’s endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic candidate for the 2024 election. Harris, thus far, faces no significant challengers within the party, with prominent figures such as California Governor Gavin Newsom and other speculated candidates endorsing her candidacy following Biden’s announcement.

Reports had circulated suggesting that Senator Joe Manchin (I-WV) might re-register as a Democrat to run for the nomination. However, Manchin quickly dispelled these rumors, affirming his decision not to enter the race.

This development has reinforced Harris’s position as the presumptive nominee, further consolidating the Democratic front despite underlying tensions.

Harris’s ascent comes at a time when the Democratic Party seeks to project unity and stability. The endorsement from Biden, coupled with support from significant party figures, aims to present a cohesive front going into the 2024 election.

Yet, the questions surrounding Biden’s health and the circumstances of his withdrawal continue to fuel conservative critiques.

The concerns about Biden’s health have been exacerbated by his recent COVID-19 diagnosis. Biden has not been seen publicly for several days, prompting speculation about his condition. The timing of his illness and subsequent withdrawal announcement has provided fodder for critics who argue that his health issues were more severe than previously disclosed.

This situation has added a layer of complexity to the political landscape, with Republicans seizing the moment to question the transparency and decision-making processes within the Democratic Party. The call for invoking the 25th Amendment reflects a broader strategy to highlight perceived weaknesses and inconsistencies in Democratic leadership.

Senator Schmitt’s demand for invoking the 25th Amendment underscores the contentious and highly polarized nature of contemporary American politics. As the 2024 election approaches, the debates over leadership, health, and capacity will undoubtedly intensify.

The Republican Party, under figures like Schmitt, continues to press for accountability and transparency, leveraging every opportunity to challenge the current administration.

Meanwhile, the Democratic Party faces the dual challenge of uniting behind Harris while addressing the lingering questions about Biden’s tenure and health. The coming months promise to be a critical period for both parties as they navigate these complex and high-stakes political dynamics.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Following the attempt on Trump’s life, Democrats have shown their true colors. And no one likes what they are seeing.

But now, a Democrat representative has made a horrific accusation following the assassination attempt.

In a heated exchange during a recent congressional hearing, Representative Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) accused Republicans of exploiting concerns over the U.S. Secret Service’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) goals to further what she claims is a racist and sexist agenda.

The controversy erupted after some Republicans raised alarms about the agency’s target to have 30 percent of its employees be women by 2030, particularly in light of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.

During the attempted assassination, three female Secret Service agents rushed the stage when Trump was shot in the ear. Critics pointed out that the female agents were unable to fully cover the six-foot-three GOP nominee, sparking scrutiny of the Secret Service’s DEI hiring practices.

This incident has been leveraged by many Americans to question the effectiveness of prioritizing diversity over purely merit-based hiring.

Rep. Pressley’s accusations against Republicans seem to ignore the legitimate concerns about operational effectiveness and national security. “Republicans have exploited this moment to continue to attack progress towards racial justice and gender equity in America. Disappointing, but not surprising,” she stated during the hearing.

Pressley at the hearing on the attempted assassination of President Donald J. Trump: "Republicans have wrongfully and shamefully stated that hiring women and people of color hindered the response to the shooting." pic.twitter.com/VgOhaeHS6j

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) July 22, 2024

Pressley’s remarks are emblematic of the Democratic strategy to deflect valid criticisms by framing them as attacks on DEI initiatives.

Pressley defended the Secret Service’s commitment to DEI, arguing that the inclusion of women and people of color strengthens the agency. “I hesitate to repeat their racist and sexist tropes, but in summary, Republicans have wrongfully and shamefully stated that hiring women and people of color hindered the response to the shooting,” she asserted.

“This is part and parcel of Republican strategy to constantly attack necessary diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts to undermine the contributions that women, people of color, the disability community, and others make to this country each and every day, and it is disgraceful.”

While Pressley champions DEI as a tool for justice and equality, her rhetoric glosses over the critical issue at hand: ensuring the highest level of competence and readiness in the Secret Service.

The debate is not about opposing diversity but about prioritizing the security and efficiency of those tasked with protecting national leaders.

The Secret Service’s goal to have 30 percent of its workforce be female by 2030 has come under fire, particularly from conservative circles. Critics argue that setting such targets can lead to a compromise in the quality of hires, potentially jeopardizing the agency’s primary mission of protecting national leaders.

When asked if she wanted “a third” of the Secret Service staff to be female, Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle clarified, “I’ve never stated that I want one-third of the Secret Service to be women.” She pointed out the agency’s commitment is to a 30 percent target, not 33 percent as suggested by some interpretations.

This distinction, while seemingly minor, underscores the sensitivity and complexity of implementing DEI policies in agencies tasked with high-stakes responsibilities. Cheatle’s response aimed to dispel misunderstandings while reaffirming the agency’s commitment to fostering a diverse and capable workforce. However, this commitment should not come at the expense of security and effectiveness.

Republican critics have seized on the assassination attempt to question the wisdom of DEI targets. They argue that such policies might prioritize identity over competence, potentially leading to situations where agents are not optimally positioned to handle emergencies.

This perspective was echoed in the aftermath of the assassination attempt, where some noted that the female agents on Trump’s detail were not physically able to provide the full body coverage needed for the six-foot-three candidate.

The criticism reflects a broader conservative concern that DEI initiatives can sometimes overreach, leading to unintended consequences that may impact the effectiveness of critical operations. The primary mission of the Secret Service is to protect national leaders, and any policy that potentially compromises this mission should be rigorously scrutinized.

The debate over DEI goals within the U.S. Secret Service highlights a fundamental clash between progressive and conservative values. For Rep. Pressley and her allies, the pursuit of diversity and inclusion is an essential step towards a more just and effective federal workforce. However, for their opponents, the focus on identity politics risks undermining the competence and reliability of crucial agencies.

Republicans argue that the Secret Service’s priority should be on hiring the most qualified individuals, regardless of gender or race, to ensure the highest level of protection for national leaders. The Trump assassination attempt serves as a stark reminder of the potential dangers of prioritizing diversity over merit.

The Republican perspective emphasizes the importance of competence and effectiveness in national security roles. As such, it is imperative that any DEI initiatives do not compromise the primary mission of the Secret Service.

The debate over DEI goals in the Secret Service, highlighted by Rep. Ayanna Pressley’s accusations, underscores a significant divide in American politics.

While Democrats push for greater diversity and inclusion, Republicans raise valid concerns about the potential impact on national security and operational effectiveness.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

Rumors have been flying regarding what happened to Joe Biden over the weekend. And no one was prepared for the truth.

And shocking Biden reports have revealed this massive issue is what caused him to step aside.

After the dramatic turn of events in which President Joe Biden abruptly cancelled his campaign events in Nevada and returned to Delaware last Wednesday, reports of an undisclosed medical emergency in Las Vegas have emerged.

This unexpected development culminated in Biden announcing his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race in a letter posted on his X account (formerly Twitter) on Sunday. In the same post, Biden endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic candidate for president.

According to conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, the sequence of events began when the U.S. Secret Service informed the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) of an emergency situation involving President Biden. The LVMPD was instructed to close necessary streets to facilitate the President’s immediate transport to University Medical Center (UMC).

“US Secret Service informed LV Metro that there was an emergency situation involving Joe Biden and to close necessary streets so that POTUS could be transported immediately to University Medical, which they began to do in earnest,” Kirk posted on Monday.

Got a weird lead on a story that people should look into. I got a call from a source close to Las Vegas Metro. The official story was that Joe Biden's trip was cut short last week due to COVID. However, according to this source, US Secret Service informed LV Metro that there was…

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) July 22, 2024

However, plans abruptly changed. The Secret Service then issued a stand-down order and informed local police that they would medivac the President to Johns Hopkins Hospital, implying a rapid return to the East Coast.

This sudden shift in plans sparked rumors within the police department, with some speculating that President Biden might have been in a critical condition.

Reports from The Dossier’s Jordan Schachtel, who gathered accounts from over half a dozen law enforcement officers and individuals with firsthand knowledge of the incident, confirmed many aspects of the story.

Biden had been dining at Lindo Michoacan, a local Mexican restaurant, when law enforcement received radio notifications about the President’s unspecified medical emergency. “Easily hundreds of officers and employees heard the broadcast live and set in motion emergency response procedures,” one source noted.

Initially, the plan was to take Biden to the University Medical Center, located just two miles away. Emergency squads were deployed to clear the route. Local NBC affiliate KSNV reported that UMC was on standby, alerted about a possible medical issue involving the President.

However, in a sudden change of plans, Biden’s team decided to expedite his departure from Las Vegas, directing law enforcement to clear a route to Harry Reid International Airport instead. Air Force One then flew the President back to Delaware at an unprecedented speed.

Emily Goodin, Senior White House Correspondent for the Daily Mail, reported that the flight from Las Vegas to Dover Airbase took just 3 hours and 48 minutes, a notably fast trip that caused the plane to shake from the speed.

The exact nature of Biden’s medical emergency remains undisclosed. Officers involved in the incident stated that the rapid response and urgency suggested a situation far more severe than a positive COVID-19 test, which would not typically warrant such drastic measures.

On Sunday, Biden’s younger brother, Frank, confirmed suspicions about Biden’s health contributing to his decision to drop out of the race. “In my humble opinion, absolutely,” he told CBS, adding that he is grateful for “whatever time we have left.”

President Biden had been in Las Vegas to deliver the keynote address at the NAACP National Convention at the Mandalay Bay Hotel on Tuesday. By Wednesday, his staff announced a COVID-19 diagnosis, leading to the cancellation of his remaining campaign events. After his return to Delaware, Biden has not been seen publicly since stepping off the plane.

The President’s sudden withdrawal from the 2024 race has sent shockwaves through the political landscape, raising questions about the stability and direction of the Democratic Party. Biden’s endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris has not quelled internal divisions, with some party members reportedly urging support for alternative candidates like Arizona Senator Mark Kelly.

This episode further underscores the ongoing narrative of instability and poor leadership within the Democratic Party. The dramatic and secretive nature of Biden’s medical emergency and the subsequent rapid withdrawal from the race reveal a party grappling with significant internal challenges and a lack of coherent strategy.

From a conservative perspective, this incident exemplifies the broader failures of the Democratic leadership. President Biden’s health issues and the party’s chaotic response reflect a lack of transparency and accountability that has become all too common under Democratic governance. The rapid and secretive handling of Biden’s medical emergency underscores a pattern of deceit and mismanagement.

Republicans, led by former President Donald Trump, continue to offer a stark contrast with a platform focused on strong, transparent leadership and policies that prioritize American interests. Trump’s decisive leadership style and clear policy direction stand in sharp contrast to the faltering and secretive approach of the current administration.

President Joe Biden’s sudden medical emergency and subsequent withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race mark a critical moment in American politics. This incident not only highlights the ongoing challenges within the Democratic Party but also underscores the need for strong, transparent leadership—qualities that the Republican Party, under the leadership of Donald Trump, promises to deliver.

As the nation watches closely, the coming months will be crucial in shaping the future of American politics. The Republican Party remains poised to capitalize on the Democrats’ missteps, offering a vision of stability, strength, and clear governance that stands in stark contrast to the current administration’s evident turmoil.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Joe Biden stepping aside as the nominee for the Democrat party was a shocking move. But even more terrifying is this recent news.

And a secret Democrat plot to remove Joe Biden was just uncovered.

Recent news that highlights the depths of disarray within the Democratic Party claims that operatives at the highest levels allegedly coerced President Joe Biden into stepping down from office.

Sources reveal that this well-orchestrated “palace coup” aimed to oust the faltering president from seeking re-election, despite his stubborn resistance. This move, while desperate, reflects the broader incompetence and duplicity that has plagued the Democratic leadership, casting a shadow over their ability to govern effectively.

The plot to remove Biden from the race was reportedly elaborate and well-coordinated, indicative of the behind-the-scenes machinations typical of the Democratic Party’s leadership. A pivotal moment in this strategy was the live TV debate held last month in Atlanta, where Biden faced off against Republican candidate Donald Trump.

During the 90-minute exchange, Biden appeared visibly confused, and at one point, froze entirely, leading to widespread concern about his cognitive abilities and overall fitness for office. “That debate was a set-up to convince Democrats that he couldn’t run for president,” a source close to the Biden family disclosed.

This orchestrated fall was part of a broader strategy to paint Biden as unfit to lead, thus justifying his removal. As pressure mounted, Biden remained steadfast in his intention to run, prompting party leaders to escalate their efforts.

The threat to invoke the 25th Amendment, which allows for the vice president and cabinet to declare the president unfit to serve, was reportedly a key lever in these discussions. Despite these threats, Biden continued to resist until his sudden withdrawal from the race was announced in a letter posted on his X account (formerly Twitter) on Sunday.

In his withdrawal letter, Biden endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic candidate for president. However, sources indicate that the party is urging delegates to support Arizona Senator and former astronaut Mark Kelly at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago next month.

This internal discord highlights the ongoing power struggles within the Democratic Party. The endorsement of Harris has not been universally accepted, with prominent figures like former President Barack Obama withholding support.

“We will be navigating uncharted waters in the days ahead,” Obama commented, reflecting the uncertainty and division within the party.

In the wake of these events, Hunter Biden has reportedly taken a more active role in his father’s affairs, attending every official and unofficial meeting. “Hunter felt he [Joe Biden] was being set up and he was very concerned about his father,” said a source.

This increased involvement has raised eyebrows and added another layer of complexity to the ongoing saga, reflecting the pervasive influence of the Biden family within the administration.

The announcement of Biden’s withdrawal has left many within his staff and the broader political community in shock. The letter itself, typed on private letterhead and signed electronically, was unexpected and unprofessional. “Everyone was totally shocked,” a source said. “It was pretty telling that Jill Biden tweeted a heart emoji and nothing else.”

Democratic insiders have reportedly known about Biden’s declining health for years. “When I saw him a couple of years ago, it was frightening,” one source admitted.

This long-standing knowledge adds a troubling dimension to the current situation, suggesting that the party’s upper echelons have been managing this issue behind the scenes for some time, yet chose to push him forward for political expediency.

The invocation of the 25th Amendment as a threat underscores the gravity of the situation and the lengths to which Democratic leaders are willing to go to maintain power. This constitutional provision, which allows for the removal of a president deemed unfit to serve, has rarely been invoked and carries significant political ramifications. The mere discussion of its use indicates a profound crisis within the Democratic Party, reflecting deep concerns about Biden’s capability to lead.

This move is not only controversial but also highlights the Democrats’ desperation. With an unpopular vice president and a party fractured by infighting, the decision to forcibly remove Biden reveals a lack of viable leadership and a party in turmoil. It also exposes the Democrats’ willingness to sideline democratic processes for political gain, undermining their claims of being the party of the people.

In contrast, the Republican Party, under the leadership of Donald Trump, offers a clear and decisive path forward.

Trump’s performance in the debate showcased his strength and unwavering commitment to addressing the nation’s challenges. His leadership during his presidency brought significant economic growth, stronger border security, and a robust approach to foreign policy.

The Republican Party’s unity and strategic focus stand in stark contrast to the Democratic Party’s chaos. Trump’s policies resonate with millions of Americans who are tired of the incompetence and deception from the left.

The debate highlighted the stark differences between a Republican vision of a strong, prosperous America and the Democrats’ faltering leadership.

As the Democratic National Convention approaches, the party faces significant challenges in unifying behind a single candidate. The potential nomination of Mark Kelly over Kamala Harris highlights ongoing strategic debates within the party. With less than a month until the convention and only four months until election day, the Democratic Party is under intense pressure to present a cohesive front and rally behind a candidate capable of winning in November.

The unfolding drama also casts a long shadow over the upcoming election, raising questions about the stability and direction of the Democratic Party. As Republicans prepare to capitalize on this turmoil, the political landscape promises to be more contentious and unpredictable than ever.

The forced exit of President Joe Biden from the 2024 race, driven by high-level Democratic operatives, marks a significant and contentious moment in American political history. With the party divided and the election looming, the coming months will be critical in determining not only the future of the Democratic Party but also the broader trajectory of American politics.

The Republicans, under Trump’s leadership, offer a vision of stability, strength, and prosperity. It is imperative that Americans recognize the failures of the Democratic Party and support a leadership that puts America first.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

The Democrats have shown that they are not to be trusted. But recent developments have made things even more serious.

But now, Joe Biden’s brother has spoken out and completely exposed Biden and the Democrats.

The 2024 presidential race recently took a dramatic turn when President Joe Biden decided to drop out of the campaign, citing health concerns as a significant factor. This announcement sent shockwaves through the political landscape, further intensified by the controversial statements made by Biden’s younger brother, Frank Biden.

As Americans, it’s crucial to scrutinize these developments and understand their implications on the future of our nation. Frank Biden’s remarks and the subsequent backlash from within the Biden camp highlight deepening fractures within the Democratic Party and underscore long-standing concerns about Joe Biden’s fitness for office.

President Joe Biden’s withdrawal from the 2024 race has raised many questions about his health and the Democratic Party’s strategy moving forward.

Frank Biden, the president’s younger brother, has publicly claimed that Joe Biden’s health was a critical factor in his decision to bow out of the campaign.

Frank Biden told CBS White House Correspondent Nancy Cordes, “In my humble opinion, absolutely,” adding that he is grateful for “whatever time we have left.”

However, this narrative is complicated by conflicting reports. Cordes also reported that a source close to the Biden family disputed Frank Biden’s assertions, suggesting that Frank, who allegedly suffers from alcoholism, hasn’t spoken to his brother in weeks and that his statements are “completely untrue.”

Frank Biden told @cbsnews that his brother's health, "in my humble opinion absolutely" contributed to his decision to bow out. But source close to Biden fam says “Frank Biden suffers from alcoholism and hasn’t spoken to his brother in weeks. What he said…is completely untrue.”

— Nancy Cordes (@nancycordes) July 21, 2024

This conflicting information raises serious doubts about the official reasons behind Joe Biden’s abrupt exit from the race.

Frank Biden’s comments have sparked a flurry of reactions across the political spectrum. His claims about his brother’s health have added fuel to the fire for those who have long questioned Joe Biden’s fitness for office.

House Speaker Mike Johnson was quick to seize on these developments, calling for Biden to resign immediately. Johnson tweeted, “If Joe Biden is not fit to run for President, he is not fit to serve as President. He must resign the office immediately.” This sentiment echoes the concerns of many conservatives who believe that Biden’s declining health has been evident for some time.

At this unprecedented juncture in American history, we must be clear about what just happened. The Democrat Party forced the Democrat nominee off the ballot, just over 100 days before the election.

Having invalidated the votes of more than 14 million Americans who selected Joe…

— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) July 21, 2024

Biden’s recent positive test for COVID-19, which led to the cancellation of his campaign events and his subsequent isolation, only adds to the speculation about his health. The timing of his illness and the announcement of his withdrawal from the race have raised eyebrows and intensified scrutiny. Last Sunday, Biden officially dropped out of the presidential race and endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris as his preferred successor.

Joe Biden’s tenure as president has been marked by numerous controversies and challenges, particularly concerning his physical and cognitive health.

Conservatives have frequently pointed to his gaffes, stumbles, and moments of apparent confusion as evidence that he is not fit to serve as the leader of the free world.

These concerns have been amplified by Biden’s disastrous debate performance against Donald Trump on June 27, which many believe was the final nail in the coffin for his re-election bid.

For weeks, Democrats have been urging Biden to step aside. The internal pressure has grown since his debate debacle, where he appeared visibly tired and struggled to articulate his points effectively.

These weaknesses have not only damaged his standing within his own party but have also provided ample fodder for conservative critics who argue that Biden’s presidency has been a failure on multiple fronts.

Frank Biden’s comments are particularly incendiary given the broader context of Joe Biden’s health and the Democratic Party’s ongoing struggles.

Frank Biden has never shied away from the public eye, often making headlines for his controversial statements and actions. His recent remarks about his brother’s health are no exception.

By publicly questioning Joe Biden’s fitness for office, Frank Biden has amplified many American criticisms and added a personal dimension to the debate.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story and more.

After Biden’s decision to drop out, many people have questioned his endorsement of Harris. But no one was ready for this news.

And a popular news host has made a shocking Harris prediction that has stunned the nation.

In a recent episode of “The Megyn Kelly Show,” journalist and commentator Megyn Kelly delivered a scathing critique of Vice President Kamala Harris’ potential bid for the presidency.

“I am telling you, America is not going to elect this nimrod as its first female president,” she said. “I trust in them too much for that. They’re not that dumb.”

Kelly’s comments underscore a broader skepticism among Americans regarding Harris’ qualifications and appeal. As the 2024 election cycle heats up, these critiques are becoming increasingly relevant.

Kelly’s pointed remarks about Harris being unfit for the highest office in the land add to the mounting pressure and scrutiny Harris faces within her own party and from the American public.

Kelly’s criticism of Harris is multifaceted, touching on issues of competence, public perception, and the strategic positioning of the Democratic Party.

During her show, Kelly expressed doubt that Americans would support Harris as a presidential candidate, stating bluntly, “America is not going to elect this nimrod.” This harsh assessment reflects a widespread conservative view that Harris lacks the necessary attributes to lead the nation.

One of the primary points of contention is Harris’ public speaking and perceived authenticity. Kelly and her guests highlighted several instances where Harris’ performances have fallen flat, such as her awkward laugh and use of forced, inauthentic language.

For example, during a recent appearance on “The Drew Barrymore Show,” Harris’ attempt to discuss her laugh and its familial origins came off as contrived, further fueling conservative skepticism about her genuine connection with the public​.

Kelly’s critique is supported by various anecdotes illustrating Harris’ perceived shortcomings. In one instance, Harris dropped an F-bomb during a speech at the Asian Pacific American Institute for Congressional Studies Legislative Leadership summit, a move that Kelly and her guest Dan Bongino criticized as a transparent attempt to appear relatable to younger voters.

Bongino labeled the profanity as “phony and cringe,” arguing that it exemplified Harris’ struggle to connect authentically with her audience​ (Megyn Kelly)​.

Kelly also dissected Harris’ repeated use of scripted lines, such as during an interview with ABC News where Harris repeatedly emphasized the need to “earn the reelect” and communicate their achievements. This robotic repetition, Kelly argued, makes Harris appear disingenuous and unprepared to speak off-the-cuff​.

Harris’ political career has been marked by certain milestones, including serving as the Attorney General of California and a U.S. Senator before becoming Vice President.

Despite these achievements, her approval ratings have consistently lagged behind those of her predecessors. Conservative commentators like Kelly argue that these low ratings are indicative of deeper issues related to Harris’ competence and public appeal.

Harris’ tenure as Vice President has not been without controversy. Her handling of the southern border crisis has been a particular point of contention. During an infamous interview, when asked about visiting the border, Harris responded awkwardly, “I haven’t been to Europe either,” a remark that drew widespread criticism and was seen as a sign of her inability to handle tough questions effectively​.

The discussion around Harris’ potential candidacy is occurring against the backdrop of President Joe Biden’s decision to not seek reelection.

Some Democrats have floated the idea of Harris stepping in as the party’s nominee, a suggestion that has been met with resistance from within the party and skepticism from the public. Kelly and her guests argue that Harris’ track record and public persona are liabilities that the Democratic Party cannot afford in a high-stakes election​.

Kelly noted that Harris’ tendency to laugh inappropriately during serious discussions further undermines her credibility. In a recent interview with Drew Barrymore, Harris awkwardly laughed while discussing her style of laughing, which only served to reinforce the perception that she is out of touch and not serious enough for the presidency​.

While Kelly’s remarks are undoubtedly critical, they reflect a broader conservative viewpoint that questions Harris’ readiness for the presidency. This perspective emphasizes the need for a candidate who can inspire confidence and demonstrate clear leadership qualities, qualities that Kelly and others argue Harris lacks.

Kelly’s criticism is not isolated; it echoes a growing sentiment among conservatives and even some Democrats that Harris is not the right candidate to lead the party in 2024. This skepticism is bolstered by Harris’ struggle to maintain a stable communications team, as highlighted by multiple staff resignations due to frustrations over her speaking style and public messaging​.

As the 2024 election approaches, the debate over Kamala Harris’ potential candidacy will likely intensify. Kelly’s pointed critique highlights the significant hurdles Harris faces in convincing both her party and the electorate that she is the right choice to lead the country. Whether or not Harris can overcome these challenges remains to be seen, but for now, figures like Megyn Kelly remain decidedly unconvinced.

Megyn Kelly’s analysis on Harris’ potential candidacy paints a picture of a vice president struggling to find her footing and connect with the American public. From awkward public speaking moments to perceived inauthenticity, Harris faces an uphill battle in her quest for the presidency.

This perspective, as articulated by Kelly, underscores a belief that America deserves a leader who is articulate, genuine, and prepared to handle the challenges of the office. Harris, according to Kelly, does not meet these criteria.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Barack Obama is considered by many to be one of the Democrat Party’s top allies. But all of that has changed.

Because Barack Obama has turned his back on the Democrat party with a surprising betrayal.

In a move that could completely end things for Democrats, former President Barack Obama has refrained from endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee after President Joe Biden announced the end of his re-election campaign.

This decision has sent shockwaves through the political landscape, leaving many to question the future direction of the Democratic Party. The absence of Obama’s endorsement for Harris highlights the deep divisions and uncertainties within the party as it braces for a tumultuous 2024 election against the formidable Republican frontrunner, Donald Trump.

Obama’s statement on Biden’s retirement from the presidential race was a masterclass in political tact. Praising Biden’s “remarkable career in public service,” Obama acknowledged Biden’s decision to pass the torch as one of the toughest in his life.

However, the conspicuous omission of any endorsement for Harris speaks volumes. Obama expressed confidence that the Democratic Party would navigate these uncharted waters and produce an outstanding nominee, but his silence on Harris is a glaring indication of her precarious standing within the party.

Obama’s deliberate choice to avoid endorsing Harris raises significant questions about her qualifications and electability. By withholding his endorsement, Obama may be signaling a lack of confidence in Harris’ ability to lead the party to victory against a revitalized Trump campaign.

This move could be interpreted as a subtle nudge for the party to consider alternative candidates who might have a better chance of uniting the party and appealing to a broader electorate​.

In contrast, Biden’s endorsement of Harris was unequivocal. “My very first decision as the party nominee in 2020 was to pick Kamala Harris as my Vice President,” Biden declared. “And it’s been the best decision I’ve made. Today I want to offer my full support and endorsement for Kamala to be the nominee of our party this year.”

Biden’s enthusiastic support for Harris may be seen as a desperate attempt to consolidate the party’s base amid growing discontent and fragmentation. However, Biden’s endorsement alone may not suffice to propel Harris to the forefront of the Democratic primary.

Biden’s endorsement comes at a time when his own approval ratings are sinking, and his administration is mired in numerous controversies, from the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic to economic challenges.

This context makes his endorsement of Harris seem more like a strategic necessity rather than a genuine belief in her capabilities. It appears as though Biden is attempting to ensure party unity by throwing his weight behind his vice president, but this move may backfire if Harris is unable to garner the necessary support from key party members and voters​ (Megyn Kelly)​.

Kamala Harris’ tenure as Vice President has been fraught with controversy and criticism. Her handling of the border crisis, often characterized by awkward public statements and perceived inaction, has been a significant point of contention.

Harris’ infamous interview where she dismissed the need to visit the border by saying, “I haven’t been to Europe either,” was widely panned as tone-deaf and out of touch​​. Such missteps have fueled doubts about her readiness for the presidency and her ability to handle the rigorous demands of the office.

Moreover, Harris has struggled to define her role within the administration. Her portfolio includes handling the migration crisis and voting rights, yet her efforts in these areas have been largely ineffective and met with criticism from both sides of the aisle.

Republicans have capitalized on her missteps, portraying her as an ineffective leader who is out of touch with the concerns of everyday Americans. Her approval ratings have remained consistently low, with many Americans viewing her as unprepared and lacking the gravitas needed for the presidency​​.

From a conservative viewpoint, Harris’ potential candidacy is seen as a boon for Republicans. Figures like Megyn Kelly have been vocal in their criticism, arguing that Harris lacks the authenticity and competence required to lead the nation.

Kelly’s pointed remarks about Harris being unfit for the highest office resonate with many conservatives who view Harris as a weak candidate who would be easily defeated by Donald Trump. Kelly’s analysis highlights Harris’ reliance on scripted lines and her inability to connect with voters on a personal level​​.

Kelly has often pointed to Harris’ lack of compelling public presence and her failure to articulate a clear vision for the country. During interviews and public appearances, Harris has been criticized for her repetitive and often incoherent statements.

For example, during a recent interview with ABC News, Harris struggled to articulate her campaign’s strategy and fell back on generic talking points that failed to resonate with the public​​. Such performances have only reinforced the perception that Harris is out of her depth in the national political arena.

As the Democratic Party grapples with its internal struggles, the Republican Party, led by Donald Trump, is capitalizing on the disarray. Trump’s rallies continue to draw massive crowds, and his message of restoring American greatness resonates with a significant portion of the electorate.

The contrast between Trump’s dynamic, unfiltered communication style and Harris’ perceived inauthenticity could not be starker. Trump’s ability to tap into the frustrations and aspirations of everyday Americans gives him a distinct edge as the 2024 election approaches.

Trump’s recent speeches have focused heavily on the failures of the Biden-Harris administration, highlighting issues such as inflation, crime rates, and immigration. He has positioned himself as the candidate who can rectify these problems and restore order and prosperity to the nation.

Trump’s robust and straightforward rhetoric stands in sharp contrast to Harris’ often convoluted and scripted responses, making him appear more relatable and trustworthy to a significant portion of the electorate​.

Obama’s reluctance to endorse Harris underscores the existential crisis facing the Democratic Party. With Biden stepping down, the party is left without a clear frontrunner, and the internal divisions are becoming increasingly apparent. The lack of enthusiasm for Harris among party elites and grassroots activists alike points to a broader dissatisfaction with the current direction of the party.

As the party prepares for its convention in August, the search for a unifying candidate who can energize the base and appeal to swing voters becomes ever more critical. Obama’s call for the party to create a process from which an outstanding nominee emerges is a veiled acknowledgment of the monumental challenge ahead. The Democratic Party must navigate these turbulent times with caution and clarity if it hopes to mount a credible challenge against Trump in November.

The internal discord within the Democratic Party could lead to a contentious primary season, further weakening the party’s chances in the general election. Potential challengers to Harris, such as Pete Buttigieg, Elizabeth Warren, or even newcomers, may seize this opportunity to present themselves as viable alternatives, deepening the divisions within the party.

The lack of a clear and strong leader could prove disastrous for the Democrats as they face an emboldened and unified Republican Party​.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

People all across the world have had unique reactions to Biden’s decision. But this one reaction is completely embarrassing.

And a Democrat senator completely broke down when he heard about Biden’s decision.

In a historic move that has both baffled and amused political observers, President Joe Biden has announced his decision to bow out of the 2024 presidential race.

The announcement, hailed as “brave” and “selfless” by Senator Chris Coons (D-DE), left the senator visibly emotional, a sight that has sparked ridicule and raised eyebrows across the political spectrum.

Senator Coons, known for his unwavering support of Biden, did not shy away from showing his emotions during a recent event. With tears streaming down his face, Coons praised Biden’s decision as a noble sacrifice for the country. He emphasized Biden’s achievements, particularly during the pandemic, and lauded his dedication to the nation.

“President Biden has always put the nation’s needs above his own ambitions. His decision to step aside demonstrates his unwavering commitment to our country’s future,” Coons sobbed.

Biden’s decision to step down is a clear sign of the turmoil within the Democratic Party. Calls for Biden to bow out had been growing, with key figures like former President Barack Obama and Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi hinting at the need for a new candidate.

However, the dramatic way this unfolded, complete with Coons’ public display of emotion, has turned a serious political maneuver into a spectacle.

Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) didn’t miss the opportunity to point out the chaos. “This decision is indicative of the disarray within the Democratic Party. It’s clear they are uncertain about their direction moving forward,” McConnell quipped, capturing the sentiment of many Republicans who view the situation as a Democratic debacle.

The reactions to Biden’s decision have been mixed. While some Democrats breathe a sigh of relief, others express disappointment. Meanwhile, Republicans see this as a prime opportunity to highlight the instability and lack of leadership within the Democratic Party.

As Biden prepares to exit the political stage, his legacy is under intense scrutiny. Supporters tout his administration’s legislative victories on infrastructure, climate change, and economic recovery.

However, critics are quick to point out ongoing issues like inflation and border security, areas where Biden’s leadership has faced significant criticism.

Senator Coons, in his tearful tribute, tried to frame Biden’s presidency in a positive light, stating, “History will remember Joe Biden as a president who faced unprecedented challenges and worked tirelessly for the American people. His decision to step aside now ensures that the Democratic Party can put forward a candidate who can continue this vital work.”

Yet, this attempt at a noble narrative rings hollow for many who see it as a desperate attempt to salvage a floundering administration.

With Biden stepping down, the Democratic Party faces the challenge of selecting a new candidate. Vice President Kamala Harris, despite being a potential frontrunner, suffers from inconsistent approval ratings.

Other names being considered include California Governor Gavin Newsom, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. The upcoming primary season will be crucial as the party seeks to find a unifying candidate amidst internal divisions.

Biden’s withdrawal may alter the dynamics of the race, creating new opportunities for both parties.

President Joe Biden’s decision to step down from the 2024 presidential race is a pivotal moment in American politics.

While many on the left claim it reflects his sense of duty and prioritizing the nation’s needs, the way it was handled, particularly with Senator Coons’ tearful display, has added an element of comedy to the situation.

As the Democratic Party moves forward, it must navigate these turbulent waters and prepare for a competitive election.

The spectacle of Coons’ emotional tribute has left many questioning the party’s direction and readiness for the upcoming electoral battle. As the 2024 election approaches, the stakes are higher than ever, and both parties must strategize to secure their future.

In the words of Senator McConnell, “This decision is indicative of the disarray within the Democratic Party. It’s clear they are uncertain about their direction moving forward.” The Democrats have a long road ahead, and only time will tell if they can emerge from this with a strong, unified front.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Left can’t accept that the government failed the former president. Now they’re making some wild claims.

And Democrats are going off the rails with a wild conspiracy about Trump’s shooting.

A recent poll reveals that one-third of Democrats suspect the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, was staged.

The Morning Consult poll found that 34% of Democratic voters surveyed believed it was either definitely or probably credible that Trump staged the shooting, while only 45% found the theory implausible.

Prominent figures on the left have voiced doubts about the shooting’s authenticity or whether Trump’s injury was actually caused by a bullet.

Dmitri Mehlhorn, an advisor to Democratic megadonor Reid Hoffman, reportedly suggested in an email that the shooting might have been “encouraged and maybe even staged so Trump could get the photos and benefit from the backlash,” as reported by Semafor.

“Hoffman has given $7 million to a Biden-aligned super PAC and $6 million to the anti-Trump Republican Accountability PAC so far this election cycle,” The Washington Free Beacon noted.

In the email, which Semafor indicated was addressed to sympathetic journalists and also sent to them, Mehlhorn speculated that one “possibility — which feels horrific and alien and absurd in America, but is quite common globally — is that this ‘shooting’ was encouraged and maybe even staged so Trump could get the photos and benefit from the backlash.”

He compared this tactic to a “classic Russian” strategy, similar to when “Putin killed 300 civilians in 1999 and blamed it on terrorists to ride the backlash to winning power.”

He also mentioned that “Hamas on October 7” used a similar tactic. Mehlhorn asserted that if any Trump officials encouraged or knew of this attack, it would be “morally horrific,” and called on Republicans of decency to demand Trump step down as unfit.

While Mehlhorn acknowledged the possibility of “some crazy anti-Trumper” attempting to assassinate the former President, he leaned towards the theory of a staged event, citing Trump’s behavior and preparedness at the rally.

“Look at the actual shot. Look at the staging. Look at how ready Trump is to rally,” he wrote.

He urged people to consider this possibility, stating that while it feels uncomfortable to discuss, the high odds and significant stakes necessitate asking the question.

MSNBC host Joy Reid also raised doubts, questioning the medical reports and the nature of Trump’s injury.

She wondered about the location of the injured attendees relative to Trump and why Trump was allowed to pose for photos while there could have been additional shooters.

She questioned how the gunman managed to get on the roof of the building where local police were present.

Former CNN reporter John Harwood expressed skepticism, writing, “How often have AR-15 bullets ‘pierced’ part of someone’s body, ‘ripping through the skin,’ while leaving the body part intact and without serious injury? On the other hand, it’s easy to imagine a shard of shattered glass causing the bleeding Trump suffered.”

how often have AR-15 bullets "pierced" part of someone's body, "ripping through the skin," while leaving the body part intact and without serious injury?

on the other hand it's easy to imagine a shard of shattered glass causing the bleeding Trump suffered

no briefing is odd https://t.co/lchLQno9Mn

— John Harwood (@JohnJHarwood) July 18, 2024

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Democrat Party is no longer anti-illegal immigration. They just won’t say it anymore.

And now ICE has caught a criminal illegal immigration who Democrats were hiding from justice.

Deportation officers captured a registered s*x offender residing illegally in a “sanctuary” jurisdiction following his conviction for false imprisonment and s*x crimes, according to reports.

In the early morning hours of Thursday, July 11, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents apprehended 21-year-old Honduran national Darwin Adonai Garcia-Garcia. This arrest occurred approximately two months after a Maryland court decided to suspend nearly all of his 30-year prison sentence for crimes involving the false imprisonment and s*xual assault of a child, as stated by ICE. Garcia-Garcia faced charges of kidnapping, child abduction, second-degree assault, and a fourth-degree s*x offense.

The capture took place around 6 a.m. outside Garcia-Garcia’s home in Riverdale Park, Maryland. Numerous ICE agents had been monitoring his apartment complex and moved in to arrest him as he exited the building, making the arrest in the parking lot.

Garcia-Garcia, who did not appear to speak English, communicated with deportation officers solely in Spanish during his apprehension.

How An Illegal Immigrant Was Able To Get Away With Unspeakable Crimes

Initially detained by Border Patrol on December 4, 2018, after crossing into the U.S. near San Luis, Arizona, Garcia-Garcia was given a notice to appear before an immigration judge and subsequently transferred to ICE custody the next day, only to be released into the U.S. shortly thereafter.

Years later, Garcia-Garcia was apprehended by local law enforcement for allegedly abducting and s*xually assaulting a minor, as reported by ICE. He was arrested by Prince George’s County Police on January 4 and faced charges of kidnapping, child abduction, second-degree assault, and a fourth-degree s*xual offense.

The Circuit Court for Prince George’s County in Upper Marlboro, Maryland, convicted him of a fourth-degree s*x offense and false imprisonment on May 13, sentencing him to 30 years in prison. However, the court suspended all but 229 days of his sentence, allowing his release back into the community.

ICE’s Baltimore office closely monitored Garcia-Garcia’s daily activities and anticipated when he would leave his residence in Prince George’s County. Reporters accompanied the deportation officers during the early morning stakeout, resulting in Garcia-Garcia’s arrest as he was apparently heading to work.

The operation proceeded without incident, as Garcia-Garcia showed no signs of resisting arrest or attempting to escape. He is currently held in Enforcement and Removal custody, awaiting the outcome of his removal proceedings.

According to the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Garcia-Garcia is registered as a s*x offender.

Baltimore deportation officers emphasized their focus on apprehending dangerous illegal migrants who pose significant threats to the local community, with a particular aim to increase arrests of s*x offenders.

The reasoning behind the circuit court’s decision to suspend nearly all of Garcia-Garcia’s 30-year prison sentence, despite the severity of his offenses, remains unclear. The court did not respond to a request for comment regarding the case.

Prince George’s County is recognized as a “sanctuary” jurisdiction by the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for stricter immigration law enforcement.

ICE has previously criticized Prince George’s County for policies of non-cooperation with federal immigration authorities, arguing that these policies protect criminal illegal migrants.

“The county leadership has chosen misguided politics over public safety,” the Baltimore field office director stated. “We are not asking Montgomery County or Prince George’s County to conduct immigration enforcement. We are asking them to honor a lawful request to transfer these individuals into our custody so they can face due process in the immigration court system.”

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more.

Everyone’s waiting for the shoe to drop. It feels inevitable.

And now a Biden campaign official’s statement on live TV has confessed it’s over for Joe Biden.

The reality is that Donald Trump is far ahead of Joe Biden in all the polls. All the swing states are heavily in Trump’s favor right now, the national surveys and polls are in his favor, and all the publicity is going his way as well. Pollsters are even saying it’s entirely possible Trump doesn’t just win the electoral college but also wins a majority of the popular vote. Leftist data strategists, independent data strategists, and conservative data strategists all agree about this.

The Joe Biden campaign, however, insists that everyone else is lying. Joe Biden in his interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos seemed to indicate that he doesn’t believe anyone telling him he’s behind the eight ball in this election and that his internal team’s data shows him ahead of former President Donald Trump. That’s truly stunning.

It seems to only be getting worse for Biden and company as well. A new CBS poll shows Trump has his largest lead he’s ever had at any point in the 2016, 2020, and 2024 elections.

🚨 NEW CBS POLL ALERT 🚨

Trump with his largest lead in history

People saying the attempt on his life increased their favorability of him, and also saying that the Secret Service failed to do their job. pic.twitter.com/puluxcBkyy

— Red Eagle Politics (@RedEaglePatriot) July 18, 2024

Despite the best efforts from media members to get a clear answer from Joe Biden and his campaign on why they keep saying he’s ahead of Donald Trump, they continue to stonewall and keep their secrets. Just recently, a Biden official went on MSNBC and refused to provide a real answer to the question of whether they had tangible data showing Biden is doing better than Trump.

Chris Jansing Corners Biden Official For Answers, Biden Official Weasles Out

Ms. Chris Jansing of MSNBC had on Biden campaign official Quentin Folks, and directly asked him about the dire polling for Joe Biden and the Democrats. She pointed out that all of the major pollsters agree Trump is well ahead. There’s no getting around this.

So, she wanted to give the Biden campaign an opportunity to produce their explanation for why they believe Joe Biden is alive in this race. She called on Mr. Fulks to share just some data backing what they are claiming. The response is telling, that’s for sure.

“I want to ask you very clearly, do you have polling that shows Joe Biden ahead or specifically shows you a path to victory that you’re willing to release publicly given the number of calls for him to step aside?” the MSNBC host asked of Mr. Fulks.

“We are not going to release any of our public polling data. We have polls that show this race in a margin of error victory in several of the battleground states and there is a clear pathway to victory,” Fulks responded in a cold manner.

He went on to say that they have “multiple” realistic ways of winning this election against Donald Trump, which is the opposite of what almost every other pollster and surveyor is saying about this race.

“In fact, there are multiple pathways to victory in our polling, and our campaign is going to continue on our strategic mission of making sure we’re implementing our research findings into the field using campaign resources to make sure we’re carrying out the ways in which we feel like we are going to get to that path to victory,” he went on to say.

At this point in the 2020 election, Donald Trump was nine to ten points behind Joe Biden in all the national survey polls. Joe Biden was supposed to win a landslide, according to the polls, and yet it came down to the wire. It was extremely close with just small shifts of voting behavior potentially changing the outcome in another universe.

Today, Donald Trump leads Joe Biden by two to four points, depending on who you consult. That’s an 11 to 14 point swing in Donald Trump’s favor. Not only that, but Joe Biden’s approval ratings are now 16 points lower than when he took office in January 2021.

The fact remains that no one has data showing Joe Biden is doing well. It’s just impossible to say he’s faring well right now. Yet the Biden campaign insists he is.

Which makes you wonder why they are gaslighting their own voters who are trying to say he should consider stepping down since it looks so dire for him. The likely answer is you have to stonewall for as long as you can. If the answer is trying to get someone else to step in for Joe Biden, you can’t demoralize your base by giving up the ghost and making that known.

They’re saving face for whatever the outcome is. If they show any cracking before anything official is announced about Joe Biden stepping aside, it would be a disaster for the Democrat Party to deal with. Which is a little funny considering they already have a disaster on their hands.

Prudent Politics will keep you updated on any major developments in this story.