Fetterman has made headlines ever since having a stroke on the campaign trail. He’s proving he’s not all there every day.

And now Americans are outraged by what John Fetterman just did to this country.

In the over one trillion dollar, one thousand-plus page federal funding bill for fiscal year 2024, Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) specifically requested $368,000.

What was this funding for you may ask?> Well it is to support the “Built by Us” podcast which has 101 subscribers on the podcast’s YouTube account.

Under the financial services and general government appropriations addendum to the budget bill, Fetterman has designated $368,000 for the project’s earmark to ASSETS in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

Assets of Lancaster is a “non-profit organization focused on transforming communities through business” comprised of a “diverse team of innovators with extensive experience in entrepreneurship, social change, and economic development.”

The project description for “Built by Us,” according to a news statement from Fetterman’s office regarding the request in the appropriations package, is to “support women- and minority-owned small businesses through technical assistance and incubator-type services.”

The “Built by Us” podcast, which highlights the inspirational entrepreneurs of Lancaster County, is one of the initiatives on the ASSETS website.

Its description reads, “Welcome to ‘Built by Us,’ the podcast brought to you by ASSETS.”

“We’re thrilled to have you join us on this journey. In this podcast, we’ll be exploring the stories, the triumphs, and the challenges of the incredible individuals who are shaping the future of Lancaster County.”

An interview with Chef Oliver Saye about the cuisines of the West African diaspora can be found in the most recent of the eight episodes.

Jaime Arroyo is the CEO of ASSETS and the podcast host.

Jaime is a Democratic candidate seeking city council in the city of Lancaster.

Additionally, Arroyo appears in a Facebook post alongside Fetterman’s spouse Gisele as part of a Get Out The Count campaign for the 2020 Census.

The caption of the post read, “Thank you to our Census 2020 Ambassador and Second Lady of Pennsylvania Gisele Barreto Fetterman, CASA Pennsylvania State Director Thais Carrero, Councilman Jaime Arroyo, Councilman Ismail Smith-Wade-El, City and County Officials for helping us Get Out The Count – GOTC in Lancaster City this morning!”

So in case Americans were wondering, this is what your taxpayer dollars are funding…

Buried in line items of the new budget are countless of these “small” funds set aside with hundreds of thousands of your hard-earned dollars.

The Radical Left continues to show who they really care about.

They do not care about America or Americans, they care about who will re-elect them and who will support them in pushing their Radical Agenda.

Instead of giving money back to the struggling citizens of America, we are funding podcasts for people who already have outrageous salaries of our tax payer dollars.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more of the TRUTH in the news.

The Left has been denying any election fraud for years. And they have even prosecuted Trump because of it.

But now, the newest discovery of election fraud has set off major alarm bells.

On Wednesday, a former Wisconsin election official was found guilty of voter fraud charges after creating ballots for fictitious military personnel in the 2022 election.

Kimberly Zapata, a former deputy commissioner of the Milwaukee Election Commission, was found guilty of three misdemeanor charges of making a false statement in order to get an absentee ballot and one count of criminal misconduct in public office.

While the jury found that Zapata had engaged in election fraud, her attorneys maintained that she was a whistleblower seeking to identify vulnerabilities in the Wisconsin electoral process.

Zapata utilized the names of fictitious military personnel to obtain three absentee ballots through My Vote Wisconsin during the 2022 election cycle.

Voters expressed concerns about the 2020 election’s integrity, and state representative Janel Brandtjen, a Republican, received the votes at her residence.

In Wisconsin, military personnel can request an absentee ballot without providing identification.

Following Brandtjen’s disclosure of the ballots addressed to imaginary military personnel, Zapata was fired and charged with voter fraud.

Milwaukee County Assistant District Attorney Matthew Westphal said, “We rely on our election workers to maintain the integrity of our election system.”

“Ms. Zapata took a tiny hammer and started chiseling away at that foundation. Instead of helping secure the absentee ballot system, she introduced fraud into that system.”

Attorney Daniel Adams, who represented Zapata, asserted that her goal was to reveal weaknesses in the electoral process.

“She was a whistleblower, she was showing the truth, with an action — an imperfect action, but a truthful action — what was going on,” said Adams.

“There’s a huge flaw here, and if people don’t take it seriously, some nefarious person will do something bad with this flaw in the system,” Adams continued.

Brandtjen claimed she had never spoken with Zapata and had no idea why the ballots had been sent to her.
She said, “If Ms. Zapata had wished to raise concerns about the election process, she could have done so anonymously by contacting appropriate authorities rather than jeopardizing her job and reputation.”

“I cannot speak to Kim Zapata’s intent as I have never spoken with her,” she added.

Zapata may be sentenced to more than four years in jail and more than $10,000 in fines on each of the four crimes.

Her sentencing is scheduled for May.

As we approach 2024 and a potential rematch between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, electoral procedures are anticipated to be closely examined.

The widespread use of vote drop boxes in the 2020 election was found to be in violation of state election law by the Wisconsin Supreme Court earlier this year.

We must be vigilant and prepared for all scenarios, and we cannot allow the Radical Left to steal our freedoms away through false elections.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more on this developing story.

AOC is one of the most Radical politicians in America. But she has said something that shocked even her most Radical friends.

Because she made a shocking claim during the Biden hearing that could change everything.

Hunter Biden’s former business partner Tony Bobulinksi and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez got into a heated argument on Wednesday during a House impeachment investigation.

Bobulinski’s presence before the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees was a pivotal point in the ongoing probe of the financial transactions of President Joe Biden and his family.

As he worked with his son, Bobulinski personally claimed in his testimony to have seen Joe Biden commit crimes.

Following the testimony, Ocasio-Cortez addressed Bobulinski in an aggressive manner to get more information about the alleged criminal actions.

In response to a question on the precise offenses that Joe Biden and the Biden family committed, Bobulinski stated that he saw the President break RICO and corruption laws.

And this is where things got interesting:

AOC snapped back and interrupted Bobulinski and claimed that “RICO is not a crime” but is rather a legal “category.”

AOC: "RICO is not a crime" pic.twitter.com/udTcJtxlDb

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) March 20, 2024

Donald Trump and his fellow Fulton County defendants should be relieved to hear that the Radical Left no longer considers RICO to be a crime!

Surely this means that the RICO charges brought against them will be dropped right?

Of course not… this is the corrupt and Radical Left we are talking about here.

After her outburst, AOC continued to claim that the Republicans had “no charges” to bring against Joe Biden even though Bobulinski said the exact opposite (and even listed the crimes).

“I have yet to hear in the chairman’s opening the allegation that they are specifically charging the president of the United States with. I am hearing about the ‘Biden family.’ I am hearing about this and that. I am not hearing the specific allegation by this committee. What is it? It is not here. And that is the problem,” said AOC.

Bobulinski accused Hunter Biden of lying in a sworn testimony that was given just one month ago in his written testimony, which was filled with harsh allegations.

He said that Hunter Biden had downplayed Joe Biden’s role and misled the public about his commercial relationship with CEFC.

Hunter had previously denied that his father had a direct hand in any of his business dealings.

A clear picture of Joe Biden’s involvement in the Biden family’s financial dealings was shown by Bobulinski’s evidence.

He stressed that it became clear to him that Joe Biden was the main player in these transactions based on his own experiences and later discoveries.

“I want to be crystal clear: from my direct personal experience and what I’ve subsequently come to learn, it is clear to me that Joe Biden was ‘the Brand’ being sold by the Biden family,” said Bobulinski in his written testimony.

“His family’s foreign influence-peddling operation — from China to Ukraine and elsewhere — sold out to foreign actors who were seeking to gain influence and access to Joe Biden and the United States government,” he added.

The corruption of the Biden family is so extreme, yet the Left still continues defending them.

How much longer will this continue?

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

Joe Biden’s border crisis is the worst this nation has ever seen. And instead of fixing things, the Left is only making things worse.

And now, the Biden administration’s horrifying laziness has allowed hundreds of thousands of illegals to walk free.

Judges dismissed thousands of deportation cases because the Biden administration neglected to file court documents in them.

Each unlawful immigrant receives a Notice to Appear (NTA), which is filed in court by the Department of Homeland Security in order to enforce immigration laws.

However, according to new data acquired by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, or TRAC, an academic organization, DHS never filed the actual paper with the court in about 200,000 cases when NTAs were issued to immigrants at the border.

Since fiscal year 2021, more than half of the deportation cases in immigration courts in immigration hotspots like Houston, Texas, and Miami, Florida, have been dropped for that reason.

The group, affiliated with Syracuse, said, “These large numbers of dismissals and what then happens raise serious concerns.”

Following President Joe Biden’s inauguration, the percentage of immigration cases that were dismissed increased dramatically, from 0.1% in 2017 and 1.2% in 2019 to 10.6% in 2021.

Although the percentage of cases dismissed has decreased after that peak, the actual number of dismissals in 2022 and 2023 was significantly larger than at any previous time due to the record-high number of unlawful border-crossers.

The government can easily bring a second case against the foreigner if the first is dropped due to lack of documents by the scheduled court date.

However, TRAC was able to determine that, in almost 75% of cases, DHS never bothered to do so.

That hasn’t changed throughout Biden’s presidency.

Furthermore, in certain situations, an apparent clerical error is almost never fixed: just 2% of the time, the DHS in Baltimore attempted to deport the alien again.

TRAC writes, “This suggests that in three-quarters of these 200,000 cases, the immigrant was effectively left in legal limbo without any way to pursue asylum or other means of relief.”

TRAC’s data experts have long lamented the lack of transparency and propensity of immigration agencies to provide inaccurate or partial data.

“No information to our knowledge has been publicly released by DHS on why and where these problems occur,” said TRAC.

“Troubling is the almost total lack of transparency on where and why these DHS failures occurred. Equally troubling is the lack of solid information on what happened to these many immigrants when DHS never rectified its failure by reissuing and filing new NTAs to restart their Court cases.”

According to a previous investigation by TRAC, the Biden administration was able to “falsely report that its asylum backlog had been reduced this past year when in fact it had markedly grown” because 50,000 asylum papers had suddenly vanished.

Due to reserved but unused docket time, the Biden administration’s reluctance to file paperwork has the effect of clogging immigration courts.

The president’s claim that he cannot take tough measures against illegal immigration until Congress enacts new legislation is refuted by the sharp shift in immigration statistics that coincides with Biden’s inauguration.

How much longer will Biden force America to crumble on the oppression of his failed policies?

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more updates on this developing story.

The American people have been suffering under the oppressive Biden regime for so long, that some forgot what hope felt like. But now, with a Biden presidency hopefully coming to an end soon, all of that could change.

And Donald Trump’s shocking campaign promise has millions of Americans hopeful.

President Joe Biden’s finalized plan, which was unveiled on Wednesday and is regarded as the most extreme push in history to destroy the gas-powered car industry and force consumers to drive what will effectively be government-mandated electric vehicles, was met with resistance from the presidential campaign of former President Donald Trump.

A spokesman for the Trump campaign claimed that ”Joe Biden’s extreme electric vehicle mandate will force Americans to buy ultra-expensive cars they do not want and cannot afford while destroying the U.S. auto industry in the process.”

“This radical policy is anti-jobs, anti-consumer, and anti-American. It will destroy the livelihoods of countless U.S. autoworkers while sending the U.S. auto industry to China.”

Then, the statement said what all Americans were waiting to hear: “President Trump will reverse Joe Biden’s extreme electric vehicle mandate on Day One.”

“He will protect the freedom of Americans to drive whichever vehicle they choose, enhance President Trump’s tough tariffs on Chinese-imported cars, and save the U.S. auto industry for generations to come.”

The final rule was a compromise to radical environmentalists on the extreme Left who wanted to see the greatest drive ever made to get rid of combustion engine cars.

The regulation will compel automakers to quickly “ramp up sales of electric vehicles while slashing carbon emissions from gasoline-powered models,” according to The Washington Post, which dubbed the initiative “controversial.”

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) asserted that the United States would profit $100 billion annually from the prevention of more than 7 billion tons of carbon emissions through its national pollution standard.

According to an EPA statement, the regulation will lessen “heart attacks, respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses, aggravated asthma, and decreased lung function” in addition to preventing “up to 2,500 premature deaths in 2055.”

In a joint statement, the president and CEOs of the American Petroleum Institute, Mike Sommers, and American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, Chet Thompson, stated that Congress must halt the radical agenda.

The statement read, “At a time when millions of Americans are struggling with high costs and inflation, the Biden administration has finalized a regulation that will unequivocally eliminate most new gas cars and traditional hybrids from the U.S. market in less than a decade.”

“As much as the President and EPA claim to have ‘eased’ their approach, nothing could be further from the truth.”

“This regulation will make new gas-powered vehicles unavailable or prohibitively expensive for most Americans,” they continued.

“For them, this wildly unpopular policy is going to feel and function like a ban.”

So while the Radical Left wants to take our freedoms away and push their Radical agenda, Trump promises to free us from the grip of the Left.

Americans have a choice to make this November… and it seems to be an easy one.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Hunter Biden has been in hot water for a very long time. But things just keep getting worse.

And now, Hunter Biden’s public hearing decision has absolutely astounded America.

As most people will recall, Hunter Biden’s lawyers have been demanding a public hearing for Hunter for months and months.

They demanded that Hunter should be given an opportunity to defend himself and his family in front of the whole world.

And while the House Oversight Committee pushed back at first, they did finally agree to hold a public hearing.

They held a public hearing on Capitol Hill on Wednesday with past “business” partners of Hunter and Joe Biden.

However, and here is where people’s minds have exploded, Hunter Biden chose not to show up.

After begging and demanding for months to have a public hearing, now Hunter decided not to show up after all? What in the world is going on?

Many people have taken to the internet to express their confusion and exasperation with Hunter.

Hunter Biden begged on bended knee for a public hearing on Oversight. That day is here and he says he won't show. I hope Congress will hold Hunter in contempt. Americans deserve to know how Hunter used his father as the "closer." He couldn't do anything without the "brand."

— Nancy Mace (@NancyMace) March 20, 2024

One US rep took to X to express her disgust:

“I hope Congress will hold Hunter in contempt. Americans deserve to know how Hunter used his father as the “closer.” He couldn’t do anything without the “brand,”” wrote Nancy Mae.

Monica Crowley also expressed her complete confusion with the decision saying, “Hunter Biden’s empty chair at the Oversight & Judiciary hearing on dear old dad’s deep corruption. The whole family is disgusting. We can’t be rid of them fast enough.”

Hunter Biden’s empty chair at the Oversight & Judiciary hearing on dear old dad’s deep corruption.

The whole family is disgusting.

We can’t be rid of them fast enough. pic.twitter.com/8VG8NT6lIm

— Monica Crowley (@MonicaCrowley) March 20, 2024

Earlier in the month, Hunter testified behind closed doors after he disobeyed a subpoena.

He also appeared on Capitol Hill in December, gave a furious media statement, and then departed.

HUNTER BIDEN:

"My father was not financially involved in my business…not as a board member of Burisma, not in my partnership with a Chinese private businessman…and certainly not as an artist!" pic.twitter.com/GPLplj5vtM

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) December 13, 2023

Many Americans, and quite frankly people all across the world, are wondering why Hunter and his legal team pushed so hard for a public hearing and then decided not to show up.

Why is Hunter refusing to defend himself in front of the world?

Is it because his arguments are more weak than he had originally hoped?

Or could it possibly be that there is a far deeper secret that he is hoping the American people will not discover?

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics to find out more.

Joe Biden and the Radical Left are always changing their angles and saying whatever they think will get them votes. But now, this could majorly backfire.

Because Biden has changed his angle and made a dangerous pro-terrorist statement.

Up until recently, Biden seemed to be taking a stance against terrorism (at least in some cases).

And while he most certainly hates America, people didn’t really think he loved terrorists.

But now, all of that has changed, and he has made his true intentions known, and the world is terrified.

In an apparent reversal in U.S. policy toward the Gaza war, State Department Deputy Spokesman Vedant Patel told reporters during a briefing on Tuesday that the U.S. shares the objective of “degrading” Hamas rather than using the word “defeating.”

President Joe Biden agreed with Israel’s objective of “defeating” Hamas, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan told reporters on Monday, but he thought Israel did not have to assault Hamas in its final bastion, Rafah, to accomplish this:

“The President told the Prime Minister again today that we share the goal of defeating Hamas, but we just believe you need a coherent and sustainable strategy to make that happen.

…

Now, the President has rejected — and did again today — the strawman that raising questions about Rafah is the same as raising questions about defeating Hamas. That’s just nonsense.

…

And from the U.S. perspective, this is not a question of defeating Hamas. And anytime I hear an argument that says, “If you don’t smash into Rafah, you can’t defeat Hamas,” I say, “That is a strawman.”

…

[T]he President is not focused on what’s popular, what’s not popular, how do you shape public opinion. He’s interested in how do we get to the right result, and the right result is the enduring defeat of Hamas, a two-state solution that has a secure Israel and a Palestinian state that vindicates the aspirations of the Palestinian people, and a broader normalization of relations so that Israel also has peace with all of its Arab neighbors.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reaffirmed on Tuesday, as Breitbart News reported, that defeating Hamas would require entering Rafah.

He claimed that even though he would be willing to discuss this with the Biden Administration, it was a move that had to happen in order for Hamas to be defeated.

Patel was subsequently asked to comment on Netanyahu’s remarks on Tuesday.

In order to “target key elements of Hamas, help secure the Egypt-Gaza border, and do so without a major ground operation in Rafah,” Patel stated that the Biden Administration was looking forward to talks about “alternative approaches” with Israeli authorities in Washington.

After that, Patel spoke of “our shared goal of degrading Hamas,” which is not the same as “defeating” Hamas.

Patel also took issue with alleged Israeli plans to establish a one-kilometer-wide buffer zone inside Gaza along its border with Israel in order to thwart future terror attacks

Patel informed reporters that “there can be no reduction in territory in Gaza.”

This is a major shift and it is clear that Biden’s sympathy for murderous terrorists has grown.

We cannot allow this madness to continue.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

The Left does everything they can to control the media and brainwash the people. But now all of that has come crashing down.

Because a shocking new report has exposed the Radical Left’s control of the media.

According to FBI statistics that NBC News revealed on March 19, 2024, there were over a million background checks per month for gun transactions in 2023, a year in which crime decreased.

The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) screenings for gun transactions have exceeded a million per month for 47 consecutive months, according to information published by the Washington Examiner on July 4, 2023.

Mark Oliva of the National Shooting Sports Foundation told Breitbart News on March 19, 2024, that more than a million NICS checks have been made for 55 straight months.

This indicates that while Americans flocked to gun stores in the run-up to and during 2023 to purchase firearms, NBC News’s “fourth-quarter numbers” revealed “a 13% decline in murder in 2023 from 2022, a 6% decline in reported violent crime, and a 4% decline in reported property crime.”

“It suggests that when we get the final data in October, we will have seen likely the largest one-year decline in murder that has ever been recorded,” said former CIA analyst Jeff Asher in response to the lower crime statistics.

Following a spike in gun sales in 2013, a similar circumstance existed.

According to Breitbart News, there were 21,093,273 background checks for private gun transactions in 2013, and the FBI reported a decline in “offenses” in the violent and property crime categories in the first half of 2014.

Broadly speaking, Breitbart News noted a 2012 Congressional Research Service research indicating that the number of privately held firearms increased from 192 million in 1994 to 309 million in 2009.

Concurrently, the rate of “firearm-related murder and non-negligent homicide” in the United States decreased from 6.6 per 100,000 people in 1993 to 3.6 per 100,000 people in 2000 and finally to 3.2 per 100,000 people in 2011.

The Radical Left does absolutely everything they can to convince the American people that guns are horrible devices from the devil himself.

However, that is absolutely not the case as this data shows.

When more and more law-abiding citizens have guns and can protect themselves, criminals will be less willing to commit crimes against them.

The Left has taken over the media with their fake news and lying fact checkers, but now the American people know the truth.

Crime does not go up when more people buy guns… it is the exact opposite: crime decreases when people purchase more guns.

Many people find it a strange coincidence that the Radical Left wants to disarm the American people.

And now, with illegal aliens bringing in a massive new wave of violent crimes, Americans need to stand up for themselves and their 2nd Amendment rights.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Radical Left has been coming after Trump for years. But now, everything is about to change, because they are coming after us all.

A terrifying warning was issued by a Trump ally just minutes before being attacked by Biden’s DOJ.

Shortly before going to prison, former Trump advisor Peter Navarro held a press conference in Miami and declared that the US legal system will “have done a crippling blow to the constitutional separation of powers and executive privilege.”

Navarro additionally denounced the “emergence of lawfare and the partisan weaponization of our justice system, which we have seen done to this country with a vengeance since the coming of Donald John Trump as president.”

“I am the first senior White House advisor in the history of our republic that has ever been charged with this alleged crime,” Navarro stated.

Navarro was found guilty of contempt of Congress and given a four-month prison sentence for refusing to cooperate with the subpoena on the grounds of executive privilege.

Navarro told US District Judge Amit Mehta that “”When I received that congressional subpoena…I had an honest belief that the privilege had been invoked,” during his January sentence hearing.

“I saw alleged because, for hundreds of years, this has not been a crime. And for 50 years, the Department of Justice has maintained the principle of absolute testimony immunity, and it was only with my case that somehow that has changed,” said Navarro.

“And an executive privilege goes back to George Washington and his remarks to the Congress regarding the Jay Treaty and he said, very simply and clearly, succinctly, elegantly, that to write to the Congress he said, I cannot command you as members of Congress to come to be, you cannot command me to come to you.”

Navarro in his outrage noted that he would be the only person in that prison because of a misdemeanor.

He claimed, “Everyone else is in there for felonies.”

He then added that he “will gather strength from this.”

Navarro fiercely proclaimed that his mission “is to defend the Constitution, separation of powers, and executive privilege.”

Peter Navarro: "My mission is to defend the constitutional separation of powers and executive privilege." pic.twitter.com/i6QHguWCTM

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) March 19, 2024

Navarro showed great boldness and strength when he informed reporters that he was “not nervous” but instead was “afraid for this country because this, what they’re doing should have a chilling effect on every American regardless of their party.”

Peter Navarro: "I'm not nervous … I'm afraid for this country" pic.twitter.com/0e9WHnty5s

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) March 19, 2024

Navarro then spoke out and issued a chilling warning to the people of America:

“They’ve come for me, they can come for you.”

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The push for DEI and radical agendas are now bleeding into our government agencies. And this newest discovery is absurd.

Because now, top intelligence agencies are pushing their agents to crossdress.

According to an internal document obtained by The Daily Wire, agents at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Central Intelligence Agency, and other intelligence agencies received a newsletter that praised an intelligence official for cross-dressing, stating that it makes him “a better intelligence officer.”

Personnel throughout the entire Intelligence Community received the Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s weekly newsletter, known as “The Dive,” which The Daily Wire was able to get through a Freedom of Information Act request.

Featured in this newsletter was an anonymous official’s claim that being a crossdresser improves one’s ability to gather intelligence.

The article, titled “My Gender Identity and Expression Make Me a Better Intelligence Officer,” claimed, “I am an intelligence officer, and I am a man who likes to wear women’s clothes sometimes.”

The author proceeds to argue that, considering the current discourse surrounding gender identity and expression and professional appearance, the decision to crossdress “merits attention.”

Each page states that it is “for official use only” and “not cleared for public release.”

However, the unclassified newsletter was made available to The Daily Wire last week; however, details like author names are withheld throughout.

It was produced by the IC Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility Office of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and distributed to all intelligence community members.

The ODNI, a cabinet-level organization, is in charge of the IC as a whole, which includes the CIA, FBI, NSA, and intelligence divisions within each branch of the armed forces.

The newsletter is released at a time when the Biden administration has entrenched the DEI agenda throughout the operations of the Intelligence Community and the larger federal bureaucracy, and Trump is getting ready to end the administrative state should he win the presidency again.

In the newsletter, the anonymous intelligence officer states, “I think my experiences as someone who crossdresses have sharpened the skills I use as an intelligence officer.”

He says that he is “more aware of, and hopefully more supportive of, my women colleagues” and that he has a “better appreciation for how it can be uncomfortable to wear women’s clothes sometimes.”

“I know firsthand how wearing heels can make your feet hurt and make it take longer to walk somewhere,” he wrote.

The officer also admits that his crossdressing is distracting, but he does it anyway.

“When I crossdress it still distracts people, even though it is professional,” he writes.

“It is my hope that we can learn to accept a wider range of gender identities and expressions.”

This is simply the newest effort by the Radical Left to force their radical ideologies onto us all.

Our government agencies that are supposed to be protecting American lives are instead teaching their agents to be crossdressers.

We cannot allow this to continue. We must hold our officials accountable for their actions.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Radical Left seems bent on the destruction of America. And their hatred for American citizens is obvious.

But now, a liberal judge has made a disturbing illegal alien ruling that could put millions in danger.

According to a District Court judge in Illinois, it is unconstitutional to forbid illegal aliens from owning firearms.

On March 8, US District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman declared that defendant Hariberto Carbajal-Flores was a victim of a “violation of the Second Amendment as applied” by the “noncitizen possession statute” as outlined in 18 USC Section 922(g)(5).

This rule, which declares that it is illegal for a person “who, being an alien, is illegally or unlawfully in the United States,” was broken by Carbajal-Flores, who was detained in June 2020 while carrying a weapon in the Little Village neighborhood of Chicago, Illinois.

Having stated that he “received and used the handgun for self-protection and protection of property,” he denied ever having been convicted of a criminal.

Obama appointee Coleman cited the 2022 Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle and Firearm Association v. Bruen, which held that New York State could not legally forbid persons from carrying a firearm in public.

Coleman stated that this instance “established a framework for analyzing whether a challenged firearm regulation violates the Second Amendment.”

Courts will use this paradigm to decide whether the “Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct.”

“This Court previously held that Carbajal-Flores’ conduct is covered by the plain text of the Second Amendment…Nothing has occurred that would cause the Court to depart from its prior ruling.”

According to Fox News, Coleman earlier rejected Carbajal-Flores’ request to have his indictment dismissed in April 2022, concluding that the prohibition was lawful.

Later, following the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling, he asked the court to reexamine.

Coleman said, “Second Amendment’s plain text presumptively protects firearms possession by undocumented persons.”

“Carbajal-Flores has never been convicted of a felony, a violent crime, or a crime involving the use of a weapon. Even in the present case, Carbajal-Flores contends that he received and used the handgun solely for self-protection and protection of property during a time of documented civil unrest in the Spring of 2020,” wrote Coleman.

“Additionally, Pretrial Service has confirmed that Carbajal-Flores has consistently adhered to and fulfilled all the stipulated conditions of his release, is gainfully employed, and has no new arrests or outstanding warrants.”

“The Court finds that Carbajal-Flores’ criminal record, containing no improper use of a weapon, as well as the non-violent circumstances of his arrest do not support a finding that he poses a risk to public safety such that he cannot be trusted to use a weapon responsibly and should be deprived of his Second Amendment right to bear arms in self-defense,” Coleman added.

Eventually, Coleman declared: “Thus, this Court finds that, as applied to Carbajal-Flores, Section 922(g)(5) is unconstitutional.”

The implications of this ruling are far-reaching, and Americans are worried.

Not only has crime already drastically risen under Biden’s open border policies, but not, illegal immigrants can carry weapons.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more updates on this developing story.

Many Americans have been on the edge of their seats for months waiting to hear news about who Trump would pick for VP. But people were shocked when this news broke.

And Trump has made a VP announcement that no one saw coming.

On January 15, Ramaswamy withdrew from the Republican presidential contest and swiftly gave his support to Trump, who has since won the party’s nominee.

On February 20, the former president told FOX News’ Laura Ingraham during a town hall in Greenville, South Carolina, that Ramaswamy was on his shortlist of individuals to consider as running partners.

However, according to reports on Monday, Vivek Ramaswamy is no longer being considered by Donald Trump as his vice presidential candidate.

Instead, the former President informed his previous competitor that he would attempt to place him in a cabinet post.

Sources close to the situation told Bloomberg that Trump personally called Ramaswamy to break the news.

The secretary of the Department of Homeland Security is apparently one of the roles under consideration.

Representative Elise Stefanik, former US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, and Doug Burgum, the governor of North Dakota, are among the people Trump and his team are considering for possible Cabinet roles.

According to Bloomberg “Trump is looking for a running mate who isn’t motivated by the limelight, but who will help give him a measurable edge in the race against President Joe Biden, according to those familiar with his thinking.”

“Trump has confided to close advisers and allies that none of the names circulating as potential running mates have impressed him much. His list of options has only grown longer, not shorter, according to people close to the former president.”

Bloomberg also reported that the former president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., is very interested in a significant role during any transitionary phases.

Many people are surprised and some are even disappointed that Vivek is no longer being considered as Trump’s VP.

Vivek seemed extremely popular in the polls, and many conservative Americans were rooting for him to become Trump’s VP pick.

However, Trump still obviously wants Vivek as a close ally and part of his Cabinet.

According to Trump, the “first quality” he is looking for in a running mate is the ability to be “a good president because if something should happen, you have to have somebody that’s going to be a great president.”

He did, however, acknowledge that he thought primary voters were more concerned with the name at the top of the ticket than with the running mate.

“The one thing that never ceases to amaze me is how little of an impact the vice president choice has,” Trump declared. “It just seems to be whoever the president is.”

Also, during a prior town hall in January in Des Moines, Iowa, Trump had hinted that he had already chosen his running partner.

Whoever Donald Trump chooses to pick as his running mate will definitely be a better pick than Kamala Harris.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.