The 2024 election race is shaping up to be a close contest. But no one thought things would get this bad.
And a presidential candidate has suffered a devastating loss, and it could change everything.
In a shocking new development, independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will not be allowed to participate in the June debate between former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden, according to recent reports.
Kennedy, an outspoken critic of the Biden administration and a candidate who has garnered significant grassroots support, was informed that he did not meet the criteria to participate in the debate.
The requirements, set by the debate organizers, reportedly include a certain threshold of poll support and fundraising, which Kennedy has not reached.
However, supporters argue that these criteria are designed to exclude outsiders and maintain the status quo.
The exclusion of Kennedy from the debate has drawn criticism from various quarters, with many seeing it as an attempt by the Left to protect Biden.
Kennedy, known for his advocacy on issues such as vaccine safety and environmental protection, has been a thorn in the side of the Democratic establishment.
His exclusion underscores the challenges faced by non-establishment candidates in gaining visibility and legitimacy in a highly controlled political landscape.
Moreover, the decision to exclude Kennedy highlights a broader issue of political bias and the manipulation of democratic processes to favor certain candidates.
The mainstream media often set the rules in ways that marginalize alternative viewpoints and limit the choices available to voters.
This manipulation undermines the principles of fair competition and open debate, which are essential to a healthy democracy.
The Left continues to twist things every way they can to level the playing field for Biden.
Kennedy’s exclusion from the debate denies him the ability to speak out against his former party and will help protect Joe Biden from any extra scrutiny.
This lack of engagement is detrimental to the democratic process, as it prevents voters from hearing diverse perspectives and making informed choices.
This exclusion raises questions about the role of debate organizers and the criteria they use to determine participation.
The lack of transparency and the seemingly arbitrary nature of these criteria suggest that they can be manipulated to serve the interests of the Radical Left.
This manipulation erodes public trust in the electoral process and fuels cynicism and disengagement among voters.
The Democratic Party has shown a tendency to suppress any criticism and maintain a tight grip on its narrative.
This approach stifles healthy debate and innovation within the party, making it less responsive to the needs and concerns of its diverse constituency.
The treatment of Kennedy is reminiscent of the challenges faced by other non-establishment candidates in recent years.
From RFK Jr. to Tulsi Gabbard, candidates who challenge the status quo have often been marginalized and excluded from key debates and discussions.
Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story and more.
