Home Blog Page 2

MSNBC’s Jen Psaki is in deep trouble after her unhinged assault against JD Vance’s wife

0

Psaki’s career took a nosedive after being cut as Biden’s press secretary. Now she’s grasping at straws.

And she’s in deep trouble after her unhinged assault against JD Vance’s wife.

Psaki’s Podcast Remarks Ignite Firestorm

Former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, a key figure in the Biden administration, has stirred controversy with pointed comments about Vice President JD Vance and his wife, Usha, during a recent episode of the “I’ve Had It” podcast.

Psaki labeled Vance “scarier” than President Donald Trump and suggested Usha might be in distress.

“I think the little Manchurian candidate, JD Vance, wants to be president more than anything else,” Psaki said. “I always wonder what’s going on in the mind of his wife. Like, are you OK? Please blink four times. We’ll come over here. We’ll save you.”

She added, “And that he’s willing to do anything to get there. And your whole iteration you just outlined, I mean, he’s scarier in certain ways, in some ways. And he’s young and ambitious and agile in the sense that he’s a chameleon who makes himself whatever he thinks the audience wants to hear from him.” The podcast’s description echoed the jab, stating, “Usha Vance, please blink twice if you need help.”

WATCH:

Social Media Slams Psaki’s Remarks

The backlash on social media was swift and fierce. Users across platforms called out Psaki’s comments as condescending and hypocritical.

“Nothing baffles the liberal women more than a happy marriage,” one user remarked. Fox News contributor Joe Concha was blunt, stating, “Not a good person. At all.”

Another commenter highlighted the double standard: “For the party that supposedly champions feminism, they sure talk down to women on the other side.” Libs of TikTok piled on, declaring, “MSNBC should be ashamed to pay her salary.”

Conservative pundit Jack Posobiec noted Usha’s current role, saying, “Usha is accompanying JD right now in Israel securing the Gaza Peace Deal. Absolutely disgusting comments.”

White House Fires Back

White House Communications Director Steven Cheung didn’t hold back in his response on X, accusing Psaki of projecting her own issues. He wrote that Psaki “must be transferring her own personal issues onto others.”

Cheung continued, “[Psaki] is a dumb-ss who has no comprehension of the truth and has to overcompensate for her lack of talent by saying untrue things.”

He capped it off with a nod to Psaki’s past press secretary catchphrase: “Circle back on that, moron.”

Hunter Biden backstabbed Barack Obama for the most insane reason imaginable

0

There’s no love lost between the Bidens and Obamas. But this crosses a line.

Because Hunter Biden backstabbed Barack Obama for the most insane reason imaginable.

Hunter Biden Recalls Anger at Obama’s Fundraiser Incident

Hunter Biden expressed intense frustration over an incident at a Hollywood fundraiser last year where former President Barack Obama guided then-President Joe Biden offstage after a 10-second pause, according to an excerpt from Jonathan Karl’s upcoming book, “Retribution: Donald Trump and the Campaign that Changed America,” obtained by Axios on Tuesday.

In an interview months later, Hunter told Karl, “I almost jumped up on the stage and said, ‘Don’t ever f–king do that to the president of the United States again — ever.’”

He added, “I knew that that was going to be a meme,” noting that the moment “really, really, really, really pissed me off.” The episode at the Peacock Theater in Los Angeles went viral, amplifying concerns about Joe Biden’s age and mental sharpness.

Hollywood Fundraiser Highlights Biden’s Struggles

The June 2024 fundraiser, which raised over $30 million for Joe Biden’s re-election campaign, occurred just before his faltering debate performance against President Donald Trump, which ultimately led to Biden’s withdrawal from the 2024 race.

The event, attended by Hollywood figures like George Clooney, exposed growing unease about the then-president’s condition.

In a New York Times op-ed, Clooney wrote that Biden “was not the Joe ‘big F-ing deal’ Biden of 2010” nor “even the Joe Biden of 2020,” describing him as the same diminished figure seen at the debate.

Journalists Alex Thompson and Jake Tapper, in their book “Original Sin,” noted that Clooney was “shaken to his core” when Biden failed to recognize him, despite their long acquaintance.

Hunter Biden’s Criticism of Clooney and Political Fallout

Hunter Biden sharply criticized Clooney for publicizing his concerns, which fueled calls for Joe Biden to exit the race.

In a July interview on Andrew Callaghan’s YouTube show, “Channel 5,” Hunter said of Clooney, “F‑-k him. F–k him. F–k him and everybody around him.”

He dismissed Clooney’s credibility, stating, “Number one, I agree with [director] Quentin Tarantino, George Clooney is not a f—king actor … he is a brand,” and questioned his influence, saying, “He’s great friends with Barack Obama. F—k you. What do you have to do with f—king anything? Why do I have to f—king listen to you?”

The fundraiser incident and its aftermath highlighted tensions within Democratic circles as Biden’s campaign faced mounting challenges ahead of the 2024 election.

Serious lapse in election security is putting everyone on edge

Elections are about to be held in many bellwether states. And this does nothing to inspire confidence.

And now a serious lapse in election security is putting everyone on edge.

Voter Roll Oversight Raises Concerns

Despite his arrest by ICE last month and his residence in Iowa, 1,000 miles away, former Des Moines schools Superintendent Ian Roberts remains listed on Maryland’s voter rolls, according to multiple sources.

The circumstances surrounding how Mr. Roberts, an undocumented immigrant, was added to Maryland’s voter registry are sparking significant controversy.

Compounding the issue, Mr. Roberts stayed on the voter list and even had multiple absentee ballots issued to his registered address, despite having left Maryland years ago for Iowa. Under Maryland’s own regulations, he likely should have been removed from the rolls long before now.

Documents obtained by the American Accountability Foundation show a voter profile for “Ian Andre Roberts,” which indicates he was sent an absentee ballot in Maryland in 2020, around the time he transitioned from a school position in St. Louis to superintendent in Millcreek, Pennsylvania. Additional ballots were issued for his address in 2025 and earlier this year, while he was leading schools in Iowa’s largest city.

Through an open-records request in Prince George’s County, where Mr. Roberts was registered, Tom Jones of the AAF acquired his registration form. Notably, the county obscured Mr. Roberts’ response to the citizenship question—a redaction one expert in voter records described as unprecedented.

This opacity alarmed Mr. Jones.

Whether Mr. Roberts marked “Yes,” “No,” or left the citizenship question blank, his registration raises red flags, as the state processed it regardless. His signature on the form, another claim of citizenship, adds to the concerns.

“The verification process in Maryland for whether you’re a lawful voter with regard to citizenship is ‘I pinky-swear,’” Mr. Jones said. “I don’t know another place in life this serious that we’re willing to take such a flimsy assertion.”

Political Fallout and Calls for Reform

Maryland Delegate Brian Chisholm, a Republican from Anne Arundel County, called the situation a humiliating lapse for the state.

“It was so obvious this guy should not be on our voter registration rolls and should have been removed. So how many other people are in that same category?” Mr. Chisholm said. “We’re just ripe for fraud and abuse in this state. People want election integrity. We just sow more and more doubt into it when we learn of cases like this. I don’t think it’s isolated.”

Election officials have remained tight-lipped.

The Prince George’s Board of Elections deferred inquiries to its deputy administrator, Demetra K.M. Hutchinson, who passed them to the State Board of Elections. The state board referred back to a Sept. 30 press release, its only comment on the issue.

In that release, the board acknowledged public reports about Mr. Roberts but warned against assuming the individual named was the same voter, stating, “Therefore, SBE cannot and will not publicly announce whether media reports about the individual in question is or is not or was not a registered voter in Maryland.”

The board confirmed that the person listed as Ian Andre Roberts never cast a vote.

Defending its cautious approach to purging voter rolls, the board stated that removal for noncitizenship requires either the voter’s own request or a report to jury commissioners.

“This office will not disenfranchise a voter based upon partial or unsubstantiated evidence. The right to vote is a sacred right that has been expanded through sacrifices of many before us,” the board said.

Delegate Jheanelle Wilkins, a Montgomery County Democrat overseeing the state House elections subcommittee, did not respond to inquiries.

Defending the System Amid Scrutiny

Nikki Tyree, executive director of the League of Women Voters in Maryland, downplayed concerns about the Roberts case, commending the state’s conservative stance on voter roll maintenance.

“We would rather have our elections administration be cautious so as not to impact people who are eligible to vote, and really rely on that process of making sure that ineligible people are not voting,” she said.

Ms. Tyree expressed confidence in the system, stating, “I’m not really concerned about the process. What I will say is there needs to be some explanation why he wasn’t removed from the list. However, I’m very confident that the State Board of Elections has a process in place that he would never have been allowed to vote.”

But Mr. Chisholm disputed this, pointing to the absentee ballots approved for Mr. Roberts’ address.

“He could have absolutely cast a mail-in ballot or showed up in person and voted. He was active on the rolls,” Mr. Chisholm said.

Mr. Roberts faces federal charges for possessing a firearm as an undocumented immigrant and falsifying his I-9 form to claim legal work status in the U.S.

ICE initially detained him as a deportable individual. At the time, he had a loaded Glock handgun in his vehicle, reportedly purchased by his spouse, Lenisha Roberts. A search of his home uncovered another handgun, a rifle, a shotgun, and various ammunition.

AAF documents reveal that Ian Andrew Roberts registered in December 2011, noting an address change, though Prince George’s County recorded him as a new voter in January 2012.

The citizenship and s-x fields, along with his address and birthday, were redacted. He registered as a Democrat.

In 2014, a voter card mailed to his address was returned as “vacant,” leading to his status being changed to “inactive” that summer and canceled by December 2016.

Shortly after, he submitted an electronic voter registration application, restoring his “active” status in early 2017.

The 2016 form again listed him as a Democrat, with the county redacting fields for s-x, birthday, address, citizenship, and registration method.

The State Board of Elections noted that individuals may be automatically registered at motor vehicle offices “UNINTENTIONALLY” (emphasized in all caps), which they claim is not a legal violation. However, improperly canceling a registration would be against the law, the board stated.

Vladimir Putin put Trump on the back foot with a surprise he never saw coming

0

Trump and Putin have been going at it for a while now. And it doesn’t look like things are cooling down at all.

And now Vladimir Putin put Trump on the back foot with a surprise he never saw coming.

Kremlin Rejects Trump’s Ukraine Cease-Fire Idea

Russia has dismissed President Trump’s recent suggestion to halt the Ukraine conflict by maintaining existing battle lines, insisting that its position remains firm.

In response to Trump’s weekend idea for an immediate end to the war with both parties retaining their current territories, Dmitry Peskov, the Kremlin’s press secretary, dismissed any notion of letting Ukraine hold onto sections of the Donbas.

“This topic was repeatedly raised in various forms during contacts between Russia and the US. The Russian side answered every time, this answer is well known: The consistency of Russia’s position doesn’t change,” Peskov told the local media.

Vladimir Putin, Russia’s leader, has consistently demanded that Ukraine relinquish the whole Donbas as a prerequisite for any truce.

Control and Challenges in the Donbas

Based on publicly available maps and assessments from independent experts, Russian forces dominate most of the Donbas, holding all of Luhansk Oblast and roughly three-quarters of Donetsk Oblast.

Yet, Moscow has faced ongoing difficulties in capturing Donetsk’s fortified “fortress belt,” which has held off invading troops for over three years.

Kyiv has steadfastly refused to cede the area, concerned that it would enable Russia to regroup and launch a more effective assault on the rest of Ukraine without the defensive stronghold.

Follow The Post’s live coverage of President Trump and national politics for the latest news and analysis

Diplomatic Exchanges and Potential Talks

During a pre-meeting phone conversation with Trump before his discussion with Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky, Putin emphasized Russia’s demand for Ukraine to yield Donetsk, according to reports from The Washington Post.

That call preceded a lengthy three-hour session with Zelensky, in which Trump advocated for pausing hostilities along the present front lines.

“So what I say is they should stop right now at the battle lines. Go home, stop killing people and be done,” Trump told reporters on Sunday.

The president pushed back against claims that the Zelensky encounter turned into a heated argument, or that he pressed the Ukrainian president to abandon the full Donbas under threat of Russian devastation.

Even while turning down Trump’s plan, Peskov indicated Moscow’s openness to a Trump-Putin dialogue on a potential armistice.

The pair is slated to convene in Budapest soon, though Zelensky’s participation is uncertain.

Trump and Putin last held a summit in Alaska during the summer.

Trump official is thrown behind bars after surrendering himself to police

0

Politics is a dangerous game. And if you don’t play it right, you may just end up in jail.

Now a Trump official was thrown behind bars after surrendering himself to police.

Bolton’s Arraignment and Plea

Ex-White House National Security Advisor John Bolton entered a not guilty plea to all 18 charges concerning the mishandling of classified documents during his court appearance Friday, following his surrender to authorities in Maryland.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Timothy Sullivan outlined the accusations to Bolton, confirming his grasp of them alongside the risks: up to a decade behind bars and $250,000 fines for each offense.

“I do your honor,” Bolton said during his arraignment at the federal courthouse in Greenbelt, Md.

The charges encompass eight for transmitting national defense data and ten for retaining it.

Specific Allegations in the Indictment

“From on or about April 9, 2018, through at least on or about August 22, 2025, BOLTON abused his position as National Security Advisor by sharing more than a thousand pages of information about his day-to-day activities as the National Security Advisor — including information relating to the national defense which was classified up to the TOP SECRET/SCI level — with two unauthorized individuals, namely Individuals 1 and 2,” the indictment reads. “BOLTON also unlawfully retained documents, writings, and notes relating to the national defense, including information classified up to the TOP SECRET/SCI level, in his home in Montgomery County, Maryland.”

Court documents claim Bolton passed these materials to two people lacking clearance to access secrets.

Among the details allegedly exposed were insights into impending assaults by a hostile entity abroad, a partner nation’s sensitive exchanges with U.S. intelligence, plans for a rival’s missile test, and a hidden operation tied to delicate diplomatic maneuvers, plus additional classified elements.

“The FBI’s investigation revealed that John Bolton allegedly transmitted top secret information using personal online accounts and retained said documents in his house in direct violation of federal law,” said FBI Director Kash Patel. “The case was based on meticulous work from dedicated career professionals at the FBI who followed the facts without fear or favor. Weaponization of justice will not be tolerated, and this FBI will stop at nothing to bring to justice anyone who threatens our national security.”

Investigation, Response, and Legal Defense

Media captured Bolton departing his Bethesda, Md., residence Friday morning, with footage later showing him entering the courthouse; he offered no remark to Fox News on site.

The FBI had searched Bolton’s Maryland property in August, zeroing in on suspected classified holdings.

“Now, I have become the latest target in weaponizing the Justice Department to charge those he deems to be his enemies with charges that were declined before or distort the facts,” Bolton said in a statement Friday to The Associated Press, referencing President Donald Trump.

His lawyer, Abbe Lowell, told the AP that the “underlying facts in this case were investigated and resolved years ago.”

“Bolton kept diaries — that is not a crime,” he said, noting that Bolton “did not unlawfully share or store any information.”

Lowell emphasized to the AP that the accusations revolve around diary excerpts shared solely with close relatives, containing unclassified content, and that the FBI had awareness of this since at least 2021.

Top Democrat confesses Donald Trump was right all along

0

It’s rare to see the Left admit when they’re wrong. But it’s hard to deny now.

Because this top Democrat confessed Donald Trump was right all along.

Carville’s Surprising Nod to Trump’s Gaza Breakthrough

Longtime Democratic firebrand James Carville, never shy about slamming President Donald Trump, stepped up to acknowledge the ex-prez’s role in brokering a Gaza ceasefire that’s freed all 20 living Israeli hostages and quieted the guns—for now.

Trump’s pulled in kudos from all corners of the political map after clinching the Hamas-Israel pact, with hostages heading home after over two years in captivity.

Podcast Praise: Credit Where It’s Due

Dropping candor on his Politics War Room Podcast, Carville echoed the buzz that Trump merits props for the high-stakes diplomacy.

“Stopping this, bringing these hostages back. I don’t know. You know, you can say, ‘Well, it may not last that long,’ but you know what? He did it, and I think he looks… A) He deserves some credit for it, they just do and should do it,” Carville argued.

“Look at all the credit that Jimmy Carter got for Camp David, that George H. W. Bush got when the Berlin Wall fell. They’re having a legitimate, you know, kind of moment in the sun, and that’s fine.”

“And hopefully this thing will hold. We’ll see. But I don’t have any problem with saying that they did something which, as of now, other people failed to do,” Carville added in the clip flagged by The Daily Caller.

Echoing Wins Over Past Fumbles, Eyes on Endurance

Co-host Hunt chimed in, spotlighting how this feat proves Trump’s edge over prior leaders like Joe Biden.

“Yeah, no, that’s true,” Hunt agreed, recalling how “we called on Biden to get tough with [Benjamin] Netanyahu and he wouldn’t do it. I mean that really was a huge mistake because it’s the only way to get anything done over there.”

After pitching a two-state path forward, Carville doubled down: “As of right now, hostages are home and the guns are silent. That’s an accomplishment.”

“It’s a good day, it’s a good week. I hope it lasts for a while,” Hunt agreed.

Barack Obama looks like an utter buffoon after making this outrageous statement

The Obamas don’t know when to quit. And now everyone is calling out their antics.

Because Barack Obama looked like an utter buffoon after making this outrageous statement.

Obama’s Controversial Podcast Remarks Spark Outrage

Barack Obama’s appearance on Marc Maron’s podcast finale stirred up a storm online after a clip surfaced of him advocating for a depoliticized Justice Department, FBI, and judiciary—words that many saw as a veiled jab at Donald Trump’s handling of Immigration and Customs Enforcement amid rising urban tensions. In what appeared to be a critique of Trump’s ICE strategies, Obama inadvertently spotlighted the contradictions of his own tenure, drawing sharp rebukes for perceived double standards.

“That’s not who we are. That’s not our idea of America,” Obama said of the crackdown on urban crime — and the use of ICE agents and National Guard troops to keep order. “We don’t want masked folks with rifles and machine guns patrolling our streets. We want cops on the beat who know the neighborhood and the kids around, and that’s how we keep the peace around here.”

Shifting to the legal realm, he continued, “We don’t want kangaroo courts and trumped up charges. That’s what happens in other places that we used to scold for doing that. We want our court system and our Justice Department and our prosecutors and our FBI to be, just playing things straight and looking at the facts and not meddling in politics the way we’ve seen lately. And I think if enough people start not to being in a fetal position, but also not being — just not worrying about it and and detached from it, but being vigilant, but also saying, you know what – yeah, we can stand up to this. We can call it like we see it. We need people who have whatever platforms they have to be able to say, no, that’s not who we are, and to be willing to get attacked on X by whoever for doing that. And it’s not easy.”

Backlash Highlights Obama’s Own Legacy of Politicization

Detractors wasted no time in highlighting how Obama’s administration weaponized federal agencies against political foes, from aggressive lawsuits against religious groups like the Little Sisters of the Poor to the IRS’s biased scrutiny of conservative organizations and the DOJ’s role in fueling investigations into Trump. These examples painted Obama’s call for impartiality as deeply ironic, especially given his oversight of what many view as a deeply partisan era in federal enforcement.

“Irony alert,” Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) posted.

“He’s desperate. His legacy is trash and he knows it,” Senator Eric Schmitt (R-MO) added.

Governor Ron DeSantis (R-FL) added, “Says the guy who presided over the fabrication of the Russian collusion narrative and the IRS targeting of conservatives …”

Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL) added, “Barack Obama has no business lecturing anyone about ‘playing things straight.’ Under Obama’s watch: His IRS targeted conservatives; His DOJ spied on reporters; His FBI wiretapped the Trump campaign; His administration pushed the Russiagate hoax against Trump. Obama set the standard for political meddling, and thank goodness President Trump is there to clean up the mess he and Biden left behind.”

“The audacity of hypocrites like @barackobama is breathtaking, after what he did to his political opponents,” actor Nick Searcy commented.

“This is parody, right?” Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) asked.

Escalating Dangers for ICE in a Polarized Climate

Obama’s remarks, which seemed to undermine Trump’s ICE initiatives by portraying them as overreach, have only amplified the challenges faced by federal agents today. Under the lingering influence of Obama’s politicized playbook, ICE personnel are increasingly compelled to safeguard their own lives from violent American rioters who mobilize against immigration enforcement.

In chaotic urban scenes, agents encounter not just non-compliant suspects but aggressive mobs of citizens hurling objects and creating hazardous standoffs, forcing the use of defensive tactics like tear gas while navigating threats from cartels and local agitators—all amid a narrative of “resistance” that Obama’s comments appear to tacitly encourage, leaving agents vulnerable in their duty to uphold the law.

Democrats threaten to throw Donald Trump straight back into court for a ridiculous reason

0

Trump has had his fair share of lawsuits levied against him. But this is beyond the pale.

Now Democrats threatened to throw Donald Trump straight back into court for a ridiculous reason.

Democrats Escalate Fight with Lawsuit Threats Over Shutdown Tactics

Lawmakers from Maryland and Virginia in the Democratic caucus fired off warnings Tuesday, pledging court action against the White House’s aggressive moves, including abrupt dismissals and warnings that sidelined workers might forfeit retroactive wages.

These maneuvers have served as leverage from the administration to prod Senate Democrats into yielding on their steadfast stance to end the partial government closure, though concrete steps only materialized toward the week’s end.

In a memo distributed late last month by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), officials signaled that workforce cuts—known as reductions in force (RIFs)—would exceed standard shutdown furloughs. The warning hung in the air until OMB chief Russ Vought declared on X during the shutdown’s 10th day: “The RIFs have begun.”

By the 14th day, senators from Maryland and Virginia—regions teeming with federal workers—refused to waver, even as dismissals ramped up.

Outrage Mounts Over Firings and Denied Back Pay

“When they tell you when they tell you that the shutdown is making them fire these federal employees, do not believe it for a moment,” Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., said. “That is a big lie. It is a big fat lie. It is also illegal. And we will see them in court.”

The group also blasted the administration’s hints that furloughed staff could go unpaid upon resolution, a stance clashing with a 2019 law signed by President Donald Trump mandating back pay for such workers. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects around 750,000 non-essential employees affected, with daily back pay potentially totaling $400 million.

“The idea that he doesn’t understand that everybody has to get paid back shows maybe how short his memory span is, or how [he] arbitrarily wants to pick and choose,” Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., said.

Rob Shriver, ex-acting head of the Office of Personnel Management under President Biden and now at the advocacy group Democracy Forward, confirmed a legal challenge was already underway.

“As soon as Russ Vought tweeted on Friday, we were on our way back to court to file an emergency motion to stop those unlawful RIFs right in their tracks,” Shriver said. “A hearing on that motion is tomorrow, and no matter what happens, we will continue to fight these illegal RIFs.”

Shutdown Impasse Deepens Amid Unyielding Positions

Progress toward resolving the deadlock remains elusive, with the Senate set for another showdown Tuesday evening on the House GOP’s continuing resolution (CR), which has flopped seven times already. Entrenched views on both sides show no give.

Under Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Democrats insist on securing an extension for Obamacare subsidies set to lapse before open enrollment kicks off November 1. Republicans in the Senate counter that talks on healthcare can only start once operations resume.

Far from softening Democratic lines, the administration’s hardball appears to have fortified their determination.

“The message we have today is very simple, very simple,” Van Hollen said. “Donald Trump and Russ Vought: stop attacking federal employees. Stop attacking the American people and start negotiating to reopen the federal government and address the looming healthcare crisis that is upon us.”

Trump strikes historic deal that could save average Americans thousands of dollars

0

The President is the master of the art of the deal. And now he’s using his skills for everyone.

Because Trump struck an historic deal that could save average Americans thousands of dollars.

Trump Secures Drug Price Cuts from AstraZeneca

The Trump administration finalized an agreement with AstraZeneca on Friday to slash prescription drug costs, the second major pharmaceutical firm in two weeks to comply with President Trump’s push for affordable medicines.

The pact follows a similar arrangement with Pfizer just 10 days earlier, where Trump compelled companies to implement “Most Favored Nation” pricing, aligning U.S. rates with cheaper international benchmarks.

“It’s pretty beautiful to watch AstraZeneca, the largest pharmaceutical manufacturer in the United Kingdom, committing to offer Americans major discounts on their vast catalog of prescription drugs,” Mr. Trump said from the Oval Office.

Select AstraZeneca medications will become available at reduced rates on the forthcoming TrumpRx platform, set to launch next year.

Major U.S. Investment and Job Growth

Mr. Trump further revealed that the U.K.-headquartered AstraZeneca pledged $50 billion for U.S. investments over five years, focusing on research, development, and production sites. The company initiated construction on a new facility in Charlottesville, Virginia, on Thursday, projected to generate 3,600 jobs, according to the president.

AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot described the agreement as “a big win for the economy and for taxpayers.”

U.S. consumers currently face brand-name drug prices over three times those in other high-income nations within the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, even factoring in domestic manufacturer rebates, based on federal figures.

The U.S. accounts for under 5% of global population yet drives roughly 75% of worldwide pharmaceutical earnings from American buyers.

Trump’s Offensive Against High Drug Costs

Successive presidents across parties have targeted the steep prescription burdens on Americans.

Drug firms leverage substantial U.S. research incentives and healthcare outlays, yet pass little savings to domestic purchasers.

Companies instead offer foreign discounts to penetrate overseas markets, offsetting those reductions via elevated U.S. charges, effectively making Americans foot the bill for both corporate gains and international health programs in R&D and sales.

In May, Mr. Trump issued an executive order mandating steps to equalize U.S. drug pricing with peer countries.

Late July letters to leading manufacturers outlined required measures to match the lowest rates in developed nations.

“In case after case, our citizens pay massively higher prices than other nations pay for the same pill, from the same factory, effectively subsidizing socialism abroad with skyrocketing prices at home,” Mr. Trump stated then.

“So, we would spend tremendous amounts of money in order to provide inexpensive drugs to another country. And when I say the price is different, you can see some examples where the price is beyond anything — four times, five times different.”

Jimmy Kimmel got behind the microphone and started crying

0

Kimmel has been under fire for his heartless comments about Charlie Kirk. Now he’s playing the victim.

And Jimmy Kimmel got behind the microphone and started crying.

Kimmel Revives Grievances Over Hiatus

Late-night comedian Jimmy Kimmel revisited his short-lived TV suspension on Wednesday at the Bloomberg Screentime gathering, accusing conservative outlets of deliberately twisting his remarks on the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

The 57-year-old entertainer recounted his response to the incident during the event.

“I didn’t think there was a big problem,” Kimmel said of his initial take on Kirk’s killing. “I just saw it as distortion on the part of some of the right-wing media networks, and I aimed to correct it.”

Bloomberg’s Lucas Shaw suggested Kimmel’s statements faced misrepresentation, prompting agreement from the host.

“It was intentionally and I think maliciously mischaracterized,” Kimmel replied.

Kimmel elaborated that he believed his career was over during the fallout, telling Variety he confided to his wife, “That’s it. It’s over,” as Disney halted production and affiliates balked at airing episodes.

Backlash from Kirk Assassination Comments

Kimmel drew intense scrutiny last month after declaring “the MAGA gang” was “trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

The remark prompted a suspension of his program, igniting widespread condemnation from Hollywood figures and free speech advocates who viewed it as Trump administration overreach. The break spanned under seven days, after which Kimmel returned with an emotional segment skirting a full retraction.

“It was never my intention to make light of the murder of a young man,” Kimmel stated, referencing his prior words on Kirk. “I don’t think there’s anything funny about it … nor was it my intention to blame any specific group for what was the actions … of an obviously deeply disturbed individual. That was really the opposite of the point I was trying to make. But I understand that to some, that felt either ill-timed or unclear, or maybe both, and to those who think I did point a finger, I get why you’re upset.”

Critics, including those at the New York Post, blasted Kimmel for doubling down at the Bloomberg event, calling his stance “reprehensible” amid ongoing debates over late-night bias.

Return Episode and Shifting Views

Kimmel told Bloomberg his post-hiatus broadcast “probably went as well as it could go.”

The host once implied the Trump team orchestrated his time off but shifted tone in the interview, expressing eagerness for a guest spot—despite earlier claims of “pressure” from the administration that nearly ended his show, as reported by the Los Angeles Times.

Kimmel’s reentry show posted strong viewership—though the surge quickly faded, with some outlets framing the saga as a broader caution on censorship in a polarized media landscape.

Trump body-slams CNN reporter for asking one ridiculous question

The mainstream media don’t know when to call it quits. Instead they’ll keep egging Trump on.

But now Trump body-slammed a CNN reporter for asking one ridiculous question.

Trump Brushes Off CNN Question Amid White House Briefing

During a White House roundtable on Antifa on Wednesday, President Trump sharply rebuffed a query from CNN’s senior White House correspondent Kristen Holmes, linking her dismissal to her network affiliation and opting to skip her entirely.

The exchange unfolded as Secretary of State Marco Rubio handed Trump a note on the emerging Israel-Hamas cease-fire announcement.

As reporters posed questions, Holmes sought clarification on Trump’s involvement in the peace process: “Are you personally participating?”

Trump interrupted immediately, addressing the room’s senior officials: “This is CNN speaking, by the way.” “So, you know, this is one of the worst reporters that you’ll ever see.” “I don’t even want to take her question. It’s a waste of time,” he added with a wave of his hand.

He promptly shifted to the following journalist, bypassing further engagement.

Unveiling Phase One of Middle East Peace Initiative

In a Wednesday Truth Social update, Trump disclosed that Hamas and Israel had endorsed the initial stage of his comprehensive 20-point Middle East framework, signaling a potential turning point in the protracted conflict.

“The big thing is hostages are going to be released probably, our time, would be, probably Monday,” Trump shared in a subsequent Fox News interview with Sean Hannity, outlining key elements of the accord.

A high-ranking White House aide indicated the pact, which includes a temporary halt to Gaza hostilities, awaits Israeli cabinet ratification on Thursday.

Provisions call for partial Israeli military withdrawals from select Gaza areas.

Personal Outreach to Hostage Families on Deal Progress

Shortly after the reveal, Trump connected with relatives of the captives, who were gathered alongside Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, assuring them of an imminent resolution: “they’re all coming back on Monday.”

Trump framed his mediation role as a “great honor to be involved” in what he called “probably the biggest deal ever made.”

Trump moves to completely cripple the IRS with a daring and unprecedented act

0

Donald Trump has plenty of tricks up his sleeve. But this one may take the cake.

Because Trump moved to completely cripple the IRS with a daring and unprecedented act.

IRS Announces Mass Furloughs Amid Shutdown

The Internal Revenue Service informed employees on Wednesday that thousands will be furloughed as the partial government shutdown extends into its second week, according to an updated contingency plan.

The plan retains 39,870 IRS employees, representing 53.6% of the workforce, with those continuing operations compensated using “non-expiring funds.” Of the retained staff, 24,470 are assigned to the Taxpayer Services division.

The agency’s original plan kept all employees on duty for the first five business days after the Oct. 1 lapse, but did not outline steps beyond Oct. 7. Furloughs now coincide with the Oct. 15 deadline for extended 2024 federal tax returns.

Impacts on Tax Processing and Public Services

The National Treasury Employees Union, representing tens of thousands of IRS workers, warned of disruptions from the staff reductions. “Due to the government shutdown the American people lost access to many vital services provided by the IRS when the agency furloughed thousands of employees,” the union stated. “Expect increased wait times, backlogs and delays implementing tax law changes as the shutdown continues.”

“Taxpayers around the country will now have a much harder time getting the assistance they need, just as they get ready to file their extension returns due next week,” the statement added.

The union highlighted operational gaps, noting a “complete lack of planning” from the IRS that left employees “in the dark about their work status until their supervisor informed them today.”

“Every day these employees are locked out of work is another day of frustration for taxpayers and a growing backlog of work that sits and waits for the shutdown to end.”

Furloughed workers and those working without pay will receive backpay once funding resumes, per agency notifications reported by the Associated Press.

Union Calls for Resolution as Stalemate Persists

NTEU pressed Congress and the Trump administration to end the impasse. The union urged congressional lawmakers and the Trump administration to reach an agreement that reopens the government.

The shutdown affects an estimated 750,000 federal workers daily, with President Trump last week indicating some could face termination.

Senate Democrats, except for three, have blocked a Republican short-term funding bill maintaining pre-shutdown levels through Nov. 21. Democrats seek inclusion of pandemic-era Obamacare subsidy extensions and reversals to Medicaid payment and eligibility adjustments in any resolution.