Home Blog Page 2

Gavin Newsom made a 2028 election announcement that is turning heads

Prudent Politics
-
0
Gavin Newsom made a 2028 election announcement that is turning heads

Many have speculated about what 2028 will bring. But one man is certain in his mind.

And now Gavin Newsom made a 2028 election announcement that is turning heads.

Newsom’s Election Conspiracy Stokes Fear

California Governor Gavin Newsom took to “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” Tuesday to peddle a baseless claim that President Donald Trump is scheming to cancel the 2028 presidential election to remain in power.

In a melodramatic plea, Newsom warned that Trump is not only rigging next year’s midterms but could derail the next White House race entirely.

“I really mean that in the core of my soul,” he told Colbert, urging a “code red” awakening to this supposed crisis. Such alarmist rhetoric, devoid of evidence, only fuels division and distracts from Newsom’s own leadership failures in California.

Democrats’ Defeat and Newsom’s Deflection

Newsom’s appearance laid bare the Democratic Party’s disarray after their 2024 election drubbing.

“As a Democratic Party, we have a lot of work to do to make up for our failures in the past. We got crushed in this last election, and now we are in a position where we are struggling to communicate, we’re struggling to win back now the majority in the House of Representatives,” he admitted.

Rather than own the party’s inability to connect with voters, Newsom pointed fingers at Trump, whining that “facts don’t seem to matter” and decrying a “weakness that dominates our brand.”

His scapegoating of Trump conveniently sidesteps California’s own woes—skyrocketing costs, crime, and homelessness—under his watch.

Newsom’s Hollow Posturing and Legal Stunts

While touting 41 lawsuits against Trump as proof of “winning” pushback, Newsom’s saber-rattling reeks of political theater.

“We’re pushing back, and we’re winning,” he bragged, yet his legal crusades often seem more about headlines than substance.

Newsom also claimed to champion civility, citing interviews with conservative figures like the late Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon.

“I think it’s important to have those civil engagements. I think it’s important to dialogue. It’s important to learn from your opponents, and it’s important to reconcile your weaknesses,” he said. But this posturing rings hollow when paired with his inflammatory election-rigging accusations, which undermine the very dialogue he claims to value and paint a desperate picture of a governor clinging to relevance.

Democrat Senator was put in cuffs after being caught in a terrible act

Prudent Politics
-
0
Democrat Senator was put in cuffs after being caught in a terrible act

No one is above the law. It doesn’t matter if politicians pretend they are.

Because a Democrat Senator was just put in cuffs after being caught in a terrible act.

Senator Flores’ DUI Arrest in Las Vegas

On September 12, 2025, Nevada State Senator Edgar Flores, a 39-year-old Democrat from the 2nd District, was arrested for suspected driving under the influence (DUI) in Northeast Las Vegas.

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police body camera footage captured Flores unresponsive at a traffic light near Lamb and Lake Mead boulevards around 3 a.m., slumped over in his Jeep Wrangler with the vehicle in drive and his foot on the brake. Officers attempted to wake him by flashing lights and trying to open the driver’s door before knocking on the window, startling him awake.

Flores, appearing disoriented, stated he had been playing soccer at Sunset Park and was driving home but struggled to recall his address. When questioned about alcohol, he admitted to consuming “one beer” around midnight.

After failing field sobriety tests, he was arrested and booked into the Clark County Detention Center on a misdemeanor DUI charge. Released without bail after a blood draw, as allowed under Nevada law, Flores faces a status hearing on January 12, 2026.

Discrepancies in Impairment Claims

Flores’ campaign issued a statement on X, asserting he was stopped after a demanding day of work, community events, exercise, and a late dinner, claiming he was fatigued but not impaired.

They stated he cooperated fully, agreeing to a breathalyzer and blood test, with the breath test allegedly showing a 0.00 blood alcohol content (BAC), and expressed confidence that the pending blood test results, expected in approximately 90 days, would confirm this.

However, police reported that Flores refused a preliminary breath test at the scene, and his observed signs of impairment—slurred speech, droopy eyes, and difficulty balancing during sobriety tests—prompted his arrest.

Flores’ team acknowledged the officers’ commitment to public safety but indicated they are reviewing whether his rights and privacy were respected, highlighting a conflict between the police account and the senator’s claims as the investigation awaits toxicology results.

Importance of Accountability for Public Figures

The arrest of Senator Flores underscores the necessity of holding elected officials accountable to the same legal standards as the public, particularly when their actions could endanger others.

The police’s thorough response—conducting comprehensive sobriety tests upon recognizing Flores’ status as a senator—reflects a commitment to impartial law enforcement.

While Flores maintains he was merely tired, the documented signs of impairment and his failure to pass field tests justify the officers’ actions and the ongoing investigation.

This case just goes to show the importance of ensuring public officials face scrutiny for potentially hazardous behavior, with the forthcoming toxicology results critical to determining whether alcohol or other substances contributed to his condition, reinforcing the need for transparency and accountability in maintaining public trust.

Labor Department turns off the tap on immigration fraud with one consequential decision

Prudent Politics
-
0
Labor Department turns off the tap on immigration fraud with one consequential decision

It isn’t just ICE who prevents illegal immigration. It’s a team effort.

And now the Labor Department turned off the tap on immigration fraud with one consequential decision.

Trump Administration Rolls Out H-1B Reforms to Prioritize American Workers

The Department of Labor announced Friday the launch of Project Firewall, a targeted enforcement effort aimed at curbing misuse of the H-1B visa program and ensuring employers prioritize qualified U.S. hires for high-skilled positions.

This initiative aligns directly with President Donald Trump’s proclamation signed the same day, which imposes stricter controls on foreign worker entries to address perceived abuses that displace American talent. The combined measures seek to restore balance in the labor market, where critics have long pointed to outsourcing firms securing thousands of visas while laying off domestic staff—for instance, one firm approved for over 5,000 H-1B workers in fiscal 2025 amid 16,000 U.S. job cuts.

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, in a department press release, outlined the program’s focus on compliance, stating, “The Trump Administration is standing by our commitment to end practices that leave Americans in the dust. As we reestablish economic dominance, we must protect our most valuable resource: the American worker.

Launching Project Firewall will help us ensure no employers are abusing H-1B visas at the expense of our workforce.” She added, “By rooting out fraud and abuse, the Department of Labor and our federal partners will ensure that highly skilled jobs go to Americans first.” The effort builds on Trump’s broader agenda to reform immigration pathways that support economic growth without undermining local employment.

Details of Trump’s Proclamation Target Program Abuses

Titled “Restriction on Entry of Certain Nonimmigrant Workers,” the presidential proclamation takes effect at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on September 21, 2025, and lasts for 12 months unless extended.

It directs federal agencies to reduce fraud by excluding foreign workers from entry-level roles essential for U.S. graduates and requires a one-time $100,000 payment per new H-1B petition submitted after the effective date. This fee applies only to new applicants outside the U.S. participating in future lotteries, sparing current visa holders and renewals to avoid disrupting ongoing operations.

The order highlights exploitation in the program, originally designed for additive high-skilled roles but now criticized for replacing Americans with lower-wage imports, particularly in IT where H-1B holders comprise over 65% of the workforce.

Agencies including the Departments of State, Labor, and Homeland Security must coordinate implementation, with the Labor Secretary tasked to revise prevailing wage rules and Homeland Security to prioritize higher-paid applicants. Tech firms like Amazon and Microsoft, major H-1B users, have advised affected employees to stay stateside amid initial confusion, though officials clarified no retroactive impacts.

Project Firewall Empowers DOL Investigations and Penalties

Under Project Firewall, DOL investigators will scrutinize employers for H-1B compliance, a process Chavez-DeRemer will personally certify for the first time in department history, invoking authority for cases showing reasonable cause of violations.

This hands-on oversight aims to deter practices like underpaying workers or bypassing U.S. hires, with penalties including back wages recovery, civil fines, and temporary bans from the program. The department also plans interagency coordination to address discrimination against Americans, leveraging federal resources for enforcement.

While the initiative does not bar foreign talent outright, it enforces statutory requirements that H-1B roles offer wages and benefits comparable to U.S. workers, potentially reshaping hiring in sectors like technology and engineering where India receives about 71% of approvals.

As the program rolls out, it could generate significant revenue—potentially billions annually—while prompting employers to invest more in domestic training, though some industry voices warn of talent shortages if reforms prove overly stringent.

Another possible Leftist shooter just rocked America to its core

Prudent Politics
-
0
Another possible Leftist shooter just rocked America to its core

Political violence is getting more common. And there’s no signs it’s going to stop.

Now another possible Leftist shooter just rocked America to its core.

Shots Fired: A Left-Wing Activist’s Attack on Free Speech

In a chilling escalation that’s got everyone talking, 64-year-old Anibal Hernandez-Santana—a former legislative director for the California Federation of Teachers—has been arrested for unleashing a barrage of gunfire at an ABC News affiliate in Sacramento, California.

This wasn’t some random outburst; it came hot on the heels of the network’s move to yank Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show after his inflammatory lies about the assassination of conservative firebrand Charlie Kirk. Hernandez-Santana, whose social media is a nonstop tirade of anti-Trump venom, faces serious charges: assault with a deadly weapon, negligent discharge of a firearm, and shooting into an occupied building. Thank goodness no one was hurt, but it’s a stark reminder of how heated rhetoric can turn deadly—especially when it bubbles up from the far left.

The suspect’s online footprint paints a picture of someone marinating in radical fury. Back in July, he allegedly posted: “The authoritarian oligarchy is now complete. CBS+ caving, big law firms in DC, the subservients FBI and AG, university presidents stepping down, fan boys SCOTUS, public radio, ICE goons. We are going to have to ‘fight like hell’. Rules don’t apply if election was stolen. FIGHT!”

It’s the kind of unhinged call to arms that echoes the dangerous echo chambers fueling a surge in left-wing aggression. Conservative voices on X nailed it: “The man suspected of firing 3 shots into the window of an ABC affiliate in California after the Kimmel decision is a former teacher’s union legislative director whose X feed is full of far-left rhetoric encouraging escalation.” As investigations deepen, this incident feels like just another thread in a troubling tapestry of political violence that’s increasingly skewed toward the radical left.

Kimmel’s Blunder and the Network’s Wake-Up Call

The trigger? ABC’s Wednesday decision to bench Kimmel’s show indefinitely after he peddled falsehoods on air about Kirk’s tragic death. The 31-year-old Turning Point USA founder was gunned down on September 10, 2025, in a brazen assassination that’s still under scrutiny, with the suspect claiming Kirk “spreads too much hate.”

Kimmel, never one to shy from controversy, smeared the killer as part of the “MAGA gang” and took a cheap shot at President Trump’s heartfelt response.

“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it,” Kimmel sneered, twisting facts to fit his narrative.

Nexstar’s broadcasting chief, Andrew Alford, didn’t mince words in pulling the plug: “Mr. Kimmel’s comments about the death of Mr. Kirk are offensive and insensitive at a critical time in our national political discourse, and we do not believe they reflect the spectrum of opinions, views, or values of the local communities in which we are located.”

He added, “Continuing to give Mr. Kimmel a broadcast platform in the communities we serve is simply not in the public interest at the current time, and we have made the difficult decision to preempt his show in an effort to let cooler heads prevail as we move toward the resumption of respectful, constructive dialogue.” It’s a rare moment of accountability from the media elite, but one that sparked protests—and apparently, this violent backlash—outside the Sacramento station the very next day.

The Growing Shadow of Left-Wing Rage

This Sacramento shooting isn’t an isolated flare-up; it’s a glaring symptom of the rising tide of political violence from the left that’s gripping America in 2025.

Just look at the numbers: since January 2020, left-wing extremists have accounted for 22% of the 79 murders in politically motivated attacks on U.S. soil—a sharp uptick that’s outpacing earlier years.

And it’s not just talk; threats and harassment against public officials spiked 9% in the first half of this year alone, with over 250 incidents across 40 states. We’ve seen Minnesota Democratic Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband cut down in cold blood, an arson blaze at Pennsylvania’s governor’s mansion, and now this drive-by at a news station—all threads in a pattern where far-left fury boils over into action.

President Trump, who’s stared down his own share of threats, has been sounding the alarm: the radical left’s nonstop demonization of patriots like Kirk is lighting fuses across the country. While the mainstream loves to harp on right-wing risks, the data whispers a different story in recent months—leftist acts are less frequent but hitting symbolic targets like media outlets and officials with ruthless precision. Hernandez-Santana’s union background and “fight like hell” screeds? Straight out of the playbook that’s turned frustration into firepower.

As the FBI steps in—re-arresting him on federal charges for messing with licensed communications—it’s clear this isn’t just a local headache. It’s a national wake-up call: if we don’t dial back the hate from the left, these “fights” could tear us apart. Trump’s right—time to put the brakes on this madness before it claims more lives.

Chuck Schumer admits defeat to Donald Trump in shock announcement

Prudent Politics
-
0
Chuck Schumer admits defeat to Donald Trump in shock announcement

Usually Democrats put up more of a fight. But now they’ve given up.

And Chuck Schumer admitted defeat to Donald Trump in a shock announcement.

As the clock ticks toward a looming government shutdown, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) kept his cards close to the chest Sunday, refusing to dismiss the possibility of supporting a “clean” funding bill to keep federal operations running. With just over a week until the September 30 deadline, tensions are high as Democrats and Republicans remain at odds over how to fund the government past October 1.

Schumer Dodges on “Clean” Bill, Signals Openness to Avoid Shutdown

Appearing on CNN’s State of the Union, Schumer sidestepped questions about whether he’d back a Republican-proposed “clean” stopgap bill—one free of additional policy riders—if time runs out to avoid a partial government shutdown.

“Look, we hope it doesn’t come to that,” Schumer told host Dana Bash, emphasizing public support for Democratic priorities. “The American people are on our side by almost 2 to 1.”

When pressed for a clearer answer, Schumer remained evasive, saying, “We are hoping that [Trump] will negotiate with us, and so far he hasn’t.” Bash interpreted his noncommittal stance as leaning toward accepting a clean bill, but Schumer neither confirmed nor denied this, instead stressing, “The bottom line is we must get a better bill than what they had the last time.”

The comments come after Senate Democrats, alongside most of their House counterparts, rejected a GOP-backed “clean” continuing resolution (CR) on Friday. That measure, which would have extended funding through November 21, failed to gain traction.

Democrats countered with their own proposal, tying government funding to health care protections and limits on President Trump’s ability to freeze funds. That bill also fell short in the Senate, where Republicans hold a majority but need Democratic votes to clear the 60-vote filibuster threshold.

Democrats Push for Health Care, Policy Wins in Funding Fight

Schumer, alongside House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), has made clear that Democrats are digging in for concessions.

Their demands include preserving enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies set to expire at the end of 2025, undoing Medicaid changes in the GOP’s Working Families Tax Cut Act (previously dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act), and restoring funding for public health research.

Both leaders have sought a sit-down with President Trump to hash out a deal. While Trump has pushed Republicans to rally behind a clean CR, he signaled Sunday he’s open to meeting with Schumer and Jeffries, though no talks have been scheduled.

“I’d love to meet with them, but I don’t think it’s going to have any impact,” Trump told reporters at the White House.

The standoff echoes a March episode when Schumer faced backlash from progressive Democrats for not blocking a GOP-led CR to avoid a shutdown. Activists even called for a primary challenge against him in 2028. On Sunday, Schumer brushed off comparisons, insisting, “The situation is a lot different now than it was then. This is a demand from the American people across the board.”

Shutdown Clock Ticks as Congress Faces September 30 Deadline

With the new fiscal year beginning October 1, Congress has until 11:59 p.m. on September 30 to pass a funding measure or risk a partial government shutdown. The House, led by Republicans, passed its clean CR on Friday, but it lacked the Democratic support needed to advance in the Senate. The failure of both parties’ proposals has left lawmakers scrambling to find common ground.

As negotiations falter, the prospect of a shutdown looms large, with federal agencies preparing for potential disruptions. For now, Schumer’s refusal to rule out a clean bill keeps hope alive for a last-minute compromise—but with both sides entrenched, the path forward remains uncertain.

ABC news reporter is forced to give a groveling apology live on air

Prudent Politics
-
0
ABC news reporter is forced to give a groveling apology live on air

The mainstream media never checks their facts. And they have to own up to it.

Now an ABC news reporter is forced to give a groveling apology live on air.

Matt Gutman’s Controversial Comments and Apology

ABC News chief national correspondent Matt Gutman sparked widespread criticism for describing text messages between Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin, Tyler Robinson, and his partner, Lance Twiggs, as “very touching” and “intimate” during a live report on a Utah County Attorney’s press conference.

The texts, sent hours after Robinson allegedly shot Kirk on September 10 at Utah Valley University, included Robinson’s confession and expressions like “my love” to Twiggs.

Gutman’s remarks, which highlighted the “duality” of Robinson’s violent act and affectionate messages, were reiterated on an ABC livestream, where he called the texts “fulsome” and “robust.” Following intense backlash, Gutman apologized on X on September 17, stating, “Yesterday I tried to underscore the jarring contrast between this cold-blooded assassination of Charlie Kirk — a man who dedicated his life to public dialogue — and the personal, disturbing texts read aloud by the Utah County Attorney at the press conference. I deeply regret that my words did not make that clear.”

He emphasized his condemnation of the crime and its impact on Kirk’s family and supporters. ABC News has not issued a formal response, and public reaction on X remains divided, with some calling for Gutman’s firing.

Heinous Nature of Gutman’s Comments

Gutman’s characterization of Robinson’s texts as “very touching” and “intimate” was deeply inappropriate given the context of Kirk’s assassination, a calculated act that ended a public figure’s life and traumatized thousands.

By emphasizing the emotional tone of Robinson’s messages to Twiggs, Gutman appeared to humanize and romanticize the actions of an alleged murderer, overshadowing the gravity of the crime.

The texts, while personal, were part of a confession to a violent act, including details about hiding the murder weapon and evading police, making Gutman’s sympathetic framing tone-deaf and disrespectful to Kirk’s family, the 3,000 witnesses, and his supporters.

His focus on the “duality” of Robinson’s character risked trivializing the assassination, especially in a polarized climate where Kirk’s death has fueled debates about free speech and political violence.

Gutman’s apology, while acknowledging the misstep, failed to fully address the harm caused by his initial remarks, as evidenced by continued public outrage on X, where users criticized his comments as excusing or glamorizing a heinous act.

Rising Political Violence in Context

The controversy over Gutman’s remarks occurs amid a surge in political violence, exemplified by Kirk’s assassination and other recent incidents, such as the September 12, 2025, attempted bombing of a FOX 13 News vehicle in Salt Lake City and the April 2025 arson attack on Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro’s mansion.

Kirk, a polarizing conservative figure, was targeted for his outspoken views, and Robinson’s texts citing Kirk’s “hatred” as justification reflect how ideological divides can escalate into deadly acts.

Gutman’s comments, by appearing to soften the narrative around Robinson’s motives, risk inflaming tensions in an already volatile environment where media coverage shapes public perception.

The swift backlash, including calls for his firing from figures like Sen. Jim Banks and journalist Karol Markowicz, underscores the sensitivity of reporting on such cases.

As political violence grows, responsible journalism demands careful language to avoid minimizing harm or fueling further division, a standard Gutman’s initial remarks failed to meet.

New arrest after Charlie Kirk’s assassination is raising eyebrows

Prudent Politics
-
0
New arrest after Charlie Kirk’s assassination is raising eyebrows

We won’t know the full extent of what happened last week for months. But things are already heating up.

Now a new arrest after Charlie Kirk’s assassination is raising eyebrows.

Vandalism of Charlie Kirk Memorial Highlights Leftist Hostility to Conservative Legacy

19-year-old Ryder Corral was arrested for desecrating a memorial honoring Charlie Kirk, the slain founder of Turning Point USA, outside the organization’s Phoenix headquarters, just days after Kirk’s assassination on September 10 at Utah Valley University. Video evidence captured Corral trampling flowers, photos, and tributes dedicated to Kirk, wearing a black shirt with an American flag and eagle design nearly identical to that worn by Kirk’s alleged killer, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson.

The incident, coupled with a similar attack on mourners in Idaho, underscores a disturbing wave of leftist aggression targeting Kirk’s legacy as a fearless advocate for conservative values, free speech, and youth engagement, while Democrats and their allies fail to condemn such acts of political hostility.

Desecration of a Tribute to Kirk’s Legacy

The memorial, adorned with flowers, flags, and personal notes, was a heartfelt tribute to Kirk, 31, who was fatally shot during his “American Comeback” tour, an event series designed to spark open dialogue on college campuses. Fox News footage showed Corral stomping through the display near 48th Street and Beverly Road, prompting outrage from mourners.

A bystander in a blue shirt tackled Corral, pinning him until Phoenix police arrested him at 9:50 a.m., charging him with criminal damage and disorderly conduct, per Sgt. Philip Krynsky. The striking similarity between Corral’s shirt and that of Robinson, who faces aggravated murder charges for Kirk’s killing, has fueled speculation of coordinated anti-conservative sentiment, though police have not confirmed a link.

Kirk, who founded Turning Point USA in 2012, transformed it into a powerhouse mobilizing young conservatives, with over 900 college and 1,200 high school chapters. His campus debates, like the one where he was killed, challenged progressive orthodoxy and inspired millions, as evidenced by over 32,000 inquiries to start new chapters in the 48 hours post-assassination.

Supporters, including ASU student Hayden Cooper, told Fox 10 Phoenix, “He meant a lot, not just to me, but the younger generations,” praising Kirk’s courage in engaging hostile audiences. The vandalism of his memorial, witnessed by mourners like Kristina Stark, who described Corral’s actions as “very violent,” reflects an attempt to silence Kirk’s message of truth, faith, and family.

Pattern of Leftist Aggression

The Phoenix incident echoes a brawl in Boise, Idaho, on September 10, where a cyclist yelling “F–k Charlie Kirk!” attacked mourners at a vigil outside the Idaho State Capitol, only to be subdued by Kirk’s supporters until police intervened. These acts of aggression, occurring amidst a spike in political violence—including two 2024 assassination attempts on President Trump—highlight a growing intolerance from the left, emboldened by Democratic rhetoric that vilifies conservatives.

Democrats like Rep. Jasmine Crockett, who days after Kirk’s death defended calling Trump a “wannabe Hitler,” have fueled this climate, ignoring warnings from figures like Sen. John Fetterman about inflammatory language. The failure of Democratic leaders to condemn Corral’s actions or the Idaho incident reveals their complicity in normalizing attacks on conservative figures.

Kirk’s assassination, marked by bullet casings inscribed with anti-fascist messages like “Hey fascist, catch!” and “Bella Ciao” lyrics, exposed the ideological hatred driving such violence.

Yet, Democrats continue to focus on gun control, as seen in Rep. Jahana Hayes’ call to “Pass some gun laws!” during a House moment of silence for Kirk, sidestepping the political motivations behind these attacks. This selective outrage contrasts with the outpouring of support for Kirk, with vigils in West Des Moines, West Palm Beach, and London, and a planned memorial on September 21 at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, expected to draw thousands.

Honoring Kirk’s Mission

Kirk’s death has galvanized conservatives, with supporters like Kiesha McFadden, who sang the national anthem as his casket arrived in Phoenix, praising him as a “God-fearing man” who stood for truth with grace. His widow, Erika Kirk, vowed to continue his work, writing on Instagram, “The world is evil, but our Savior… is so good.”

The vandalism by Corral, like the Idaho attack, represents a desperate attempt to erase Kirk’s influence, but the growth of Turning Point USA and global tributes, including “We are Charlie” sentiments in London, prove his message endures. As investigations into Corral and Robinson continue, Kirk’s legacy as a champion of free speech and conservative values remains a rallying point against leftist aggression and Democratic inaction.

Congress was just completely reshaped with an unprecedented move no one saw coming

Prudent Politics
-
0
Congress was just completely reshaped with an unprecedented move no one saw coming

The battle lines are being drawn. This could be the fight that determines the future.

Now Congress was just completely reshaped with an unprecedented move no one saw coming.

Missouri Republicans’ Congressional Map Triumphs Over California’s Partisan Overreach

On September 12, 2025, Missouri Republicans delivered a decisive victory for fair representation by passing a new congressional district map, sent to Governor Mike Kehoe for his expected signature.

The map, approved by the Missouri Senate 21-11 and the House 90-65, strengthens the state’s conservative values by creating a seventh Republican-leaning seat, shifting the balance from a 6-2 to a 7-1 GOP advantage in the U.S. House for the 2026 midterms. This move, praised by President Donald Trump as “much fairer, and much improved,” counters California’s Democratic-led efforts to gerrymander five additional seats through a voter referendum, exposing the Golden State’s hypocritical push for partisan gain while Missouri prioritizes compact, community-focused districts that reflect its conservative heartland.

Missouri’s Map: A Win for Fairness and Unity

The new map rectifies past compromises, notably eliminating the special carve-out for Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver’s Kansas City-based 5th District, which had split St. Charles and Warren Counties. Senator Nick Schroer, a Freedom Caucus member, explained to The Daily Wire, “By way of keeping these counties back together, creating a map that is compact and contiguous, in essence, it’s making that seat more competitive.”

The redrawn 5th District now integrates rural, conservative areas, ensuring Missouri’s congressional delegation better reflects the state’s 59% support for Trump in 2024. Unlike California’s Senate, which seeks to override its independent redistricting commission to favor Democrats, Missouri’s map adheres to principles of compactness and community cohesion, avoiding the fragmentation seen in the current 5th District, which spans diverse urban and rural areas.

Rep. Dirk Deaton, the bill’s sponsor, emphasized during Senate hearings that the map “comports with every legal standard and constitutional requirement,” reducing split counties and municipalities compared to the 2022 map. This focus on geographic integrity contrasts sharply with California’s Senate Bill 627, which aims to manipulate voter-approved processes for partisan gain. Missouri’s approach, backed by Gov. Kehoe’s call for a special session, aligns with the state’s “Show Me” ethos, prioritizing Missourians’ conservative values over urban-centric agendas pushed by coastal elites like California’s Democratic leadership.

Trump’s Leadership and Missouri’s Resolve

President Trump’s active engagement with Missouri’s legislature, urging a mid-decade redraw to bolster GOP strength, was lauded by state lawmakers. Rep. Holly Jones told The Daily Wire, “This has been absolutely refreshing to have a president that is so involved and communicates so well to state legislatures.”

Rep. Justin Sparks echoed, “Having a presidential administration recognize that in order to get his mandate and his agenda passed that he has to work with the state legislatures to get that accomplished has been refreshing and very effective.” Trump’s Truth Social post celebrated the map’s passage, stating it “will help send an additional MAGA Republican to Congress in the 2026 Midterm Elections,” reinforcing Missouri’s role in advancing his America-first agenda against Democratic obstructionism, as seen in California’s resistance to federal immigration enforcement.

Missouri’s move follows Texas’s successful redistricting in August 2025, which created five GOP-leaning seats, a model for Republican-led states like Indiana and Florida. Unlike California, where Democrats face a November 2025 voter referendum to enact their gerrymander, Missouri’s GOP supermajority ensures swift implementation, with Kehoe expected to sign the map into law. This efficiency stands in stark contrast to California’s convoluted process, which risks voter rejection and highlights the state’s tendency to prioritize partisan power over democratic principles.

Democratic Hypocrisy and Legal Challenges

Democrats, led by Rep. Emanuel Cleaver and Senate Minority Leader Doug Beck, decried the map as a “power grab,” with Cleaver vowing legal challenges and Beck threatening Senate filibusters. They claim the map dilutes Kansas City’s Black voting power, despite the 1st District remaining majority-minority per 2020 census data.

These accusations mirror California Democrats’ tactics, who push their own gerrymander while condemning Republican efforts. The ACLU of Missouri and others filed a lawsuit on September 12, alleging the map violates the state constitution’s once-per-decade redistricting rule and lacks compactness, but GOP Rep. Deaton countered, “The constitution is clear that we can alter districts as we desire at any point,” citing legislative authority. Missouri’s map, unlike California’s, faces no voter approval hurdle, and past court reluctance to block partisan gerrymanders suggests limited success for opponents.

The Missouri AFL-CIO and activists are exploring a referendum to force a statewide vote, requiring 106,000 signatures within 90 days. However, with no emergency clause, the map’s implementation is delayed, giving Republicans time to solidify support. This contrasts with California’s Senate-driven push, which relies on voter approval and risks backlash for undermining the state’s independent commission, a move critics like Assemblymember Tom Lackey call divisive. Missouri’s map, by contrast, strengthens local representation, keeping communities intact while countering California’s attempt to offset GOP gains in Texas and elsewhere.

A Stand for Missouri Values

Missouri’s redistricting triumph reflects a commitment to conservative principles and fair representation, unlike California’s Senate, which seeks to entrench Democratic power through manipulative tactics. By creating a competitive 5th District and maintaining St. Louis’s 1st District as majority-minority, Missouri balances electoral fairness with its Republican-leaning electorate, which rejected Kamala Harris by 18.4% in 2024. Trump’s leadership, coupled with Kehoe’s decisive action, ensures Missouri’s voice in Congress aligns with its values, resisting the progressive overreach exemplified by California’s Senate and its allies. As the 2026 midterms approach, Missouri’s map sets a model for GOP-led states to secure America’s future against coastal elitism and partisan schemes.

President Trump deploying troops to this city in a show-stopping move

Prudent Politics
-
0
President Trump deploying troops to this city in a show-stopping move

Donald Trump has discovered a major issue in America. He’s dead set on fixing it.

And President Trump is deploying troops to this city in a show-stopping move.

President Trump is stepping up once again to restore law and order in America’s crumbling cities, announcing a bold federal policing surge in Memphis, Tennessee. This marks the second major operation under his watch, hot on the heels of the successful crackdown in Washington, DC. With violent crime spiraling out of control in Democrat-led urban areas, Trump’s decisive action shows he’s not waiting for weak local leaders to fix the mess they’ve created.

Memphis, the Volunteer State’s second-biggest city with about 611,000 residents, has become a nightmare zone for everyday folks. Last year alone, the city tallied a staggering 297 m*rders, earning it the dubious honor of having the highest violent crime rate among major U.S. cities. That’s no small feat in a nation plagued by rising chaos under years of soft-on-crime policies.

Dig into the FBI numbers, and it’s even more alarming: Memphis cops reported 2,501 violent crimes for every 100,000 people in 2024. We’re talking assaults, robberies, and worse—numbers that make you wonder how anyone feels safe walking the streets. Trump’s move couldn’t come at a better time for a city desperate for real leadership.

Speaking on “Fox & Friends” Friday, the president laid it out plain and simple. “We’re going to Memphis. [It is] deeply troubled and the mayor is happy. The Democrat mayor [Paul Young] is happy. And the [Republican] Governor [Bill Lee] is happy,” Trump declared. Even a Democrat mayor sees the light when Trump’s offering to clean house—proof that common sense can cut through party lines when lives are on the line.

Trump didn’t mince words about why Memphis needs this intervention. He admitted he’d rather tackle Chicago first, a city that’s become synonymous with gang violence and failed liberal governance. “Deeply troubled — we’re going to fix that, just like we did Washington. I would have preferred going to Chicago,” he said. But with pushback from Illinois Democrats, Trump’s pivoting to where he can make an immediate impact.

The idea for hitting Memphis came straight from a trusted ally in the business world—a railroad executive who sits on the board of FedEx, the shipping powerhouse based right there in the city. This insider painted a grim picture of the dangers lurking just outside corporate doors.

“He said, ‘When I walk one block to my hotel, they won’t allow me to do it. They put me in an armored vehicle with bulletproof glass to take me one block.’ He said, ‘It’s so terrible,’” Trump recounted. Imagine that: a top executive needing armored transport for a short stroll. That’s the reality in Memphis under current conditions, and it’s why Trump’s surge is a game-changer.

Just last month, Trump unleashed federal law enforcement and National Guard troops on Washington, DC, after a string of shocking violent crimes grabbed headlines. The results? Crime rates started dropping. Memphis is next in line for that proven formula.

For weeks, Trump has been warning Chicago that a similar operation is coming their way. But Illinois Governor JB Pritzker and Mayor Brandon Johnson—both die-hard Democrats—are digging in their heels, putting politics over public safety. Their resistance is delaying relief for a city drowning in bloodshed.

Meanwhile, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents launched “Operation Midway Blitz” in Chicago this Monday, zeroing in on illegal immigrants with criminal records. It’s a start, but so far, it’s limited to border-related enforcement. Trump wants more, and he’s not afraid to push boundaries to protect Americans.

“So we’re going to Memphis. I’m just announcing that now, and we’ll straighten that out,” Trump affirmed on the show.

Trump’s ready to escalate if needed, emphasizing the tools at his disposal. “We’ll bring in the military, too, if we need it. But National Guard,” he said. “Memphis is, look, it’s a great music city, it’s, you know, home of Elvis and everything else.”

This isn’t Trump’s first rodeo. Back in 2020, he rolled out Operation Legend, flooding major cities with federal officers to combat surging violence.

Critics on the left will cry foul, claiming federal overreach, but everyday Americans know better. When Democrat mayors and governors let thugs run wild, someone has to step in—and Trump’s the man for the job. His surge in Memphis sends a clear message: no more excuses, no more chaos.

As Trump continues to target crime hotspots, cities like Chicago should take note. Resistance might feel good in liberal circles, but it leaves citizens vulnerable.

With Memphis now in the spotlight, watch for a turnaround that restores pride and safety to this iconic American city. Trump’s leadership is exactly what the nation needs to fight back against the crime epidemic.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Legal experts handed Trump a surefire win that Democrats are freaking out about

Prudent Politics
-
0
Legal experts handed Trump a surefire win that Democrats are freaking out about

Everything is litigated these days. But at the end of the tunnel is justice.

And now legal experts handed Trump a surefire win that Democrats are freaking out about.

Strengthening Federal Authority to Combat Crime and Illegal Immigration

U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled that President Donald Trump’s deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles in June 2025 violated the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which prohibits the military from engaging in domestic law enforcement without specific exceptions. The deployment, aimed at supporting immigration enforcement amid protests, involved troops setting up perimeters, controlling crowds, and accompanying federal agents on operations like raids on marijuana farms and “Operation Excalibur” in MacArthur Park.

Breyer, a Clinton appointee, argued that these actions constituted illegal law enforcement, rejecting the administration’s claim that troops were merely protecting federal personnel and property. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit temporarily paused Breyer’s ruling, and legal experts suggest Trump’s approach may ultimately be upheld by the Supreme Court, affirming his authority to address pressing issues like illegal immigration and urban crime.

Trump’s strategy reflects a robust use of executive power to restore order in cities facing challenges from illegal immigration and crime. By federalizing the California National Guard under Title 10, Section 12406, Trump aimed to protect federal operations and ensure public safety, a move aligned with his broader agenda to secure borders and reduce urban violence. The administration’s actions in Los Angeles, and plans for cities like Chicago, New York, and Baltimore, demonstrate a commitment to leveraging federal resources when local governments fail to act decisively.

Legal Defense of Presidential Prerogative

Legal experts argue that Trump’s deployment aligns with the president’s constitutional authority to protect federal interests, particularly in contexts of public unrest. Attorney Gerard Filitti of the Lawfare Project criticized Breyer’s ruling, stating, “The judge treated ordinary crowd control as if it were unlawful ‘law enforcement.’ That’s simply not the law. The Guard wasn’t arresting people or running police investigations — they were stabilizing the situation so ICE could do its job.”

Filitti’s point clarifies that the National Guard’s role was to enable federal agents to execute immigration laws, not to supplant local police, a distinction Breyer’s ruling overlooked. This interpretation supports Trump’s position that his actions fall within exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act, such as protecting federal functions, and aligns with historical precedents where presidents have used military forces to address domestic crises.

Andrew Stoltman, an adjunct law professor at Northwestern University, predicted that the Supreme Court, which has frequently supported Trump in 2025 rulings, will likely validate his authority.

“I think ultimately he will be given the legal green light to do so,” Stoltman said, noting the Court’s tendency to grant presidents broad deference in military matters. This deference is rooted in the Constitution’s designation of the president as commander-in-chief, empowering Trump to deploy federalized troops to safeguard national interests, especially when local resistance hampers federal enforcement. The Ninth Circuit’s pause on Breyer’s order signals judicial skepticism of overly restrictive interpretations, bolstering Trump’s case as it heads toward higher courts.

Proven Success and Local Resistance

Trump’s deployment of federal forces, including the National Guard, in Washington, D.C., offers a model for his Los Angeles strategy, yielding tangible results. D.C. has seen a 40% drop in carjackings and a 27% reduction in violent crime compared to the previous year, with Mayor Muriel Bowser formalizing cooperation with federal agencies. This success contrasts with resistance from Democratic leaders like California Governor Gavin Newsom and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, who have challenged Trump’s authority.

Newsom’s lawsuit, which led to Breyer’s ruling, and Pritzker’s opposition to potential Chicago deployments reflect a pattern of blue-state obstructionism that critics argue prioritizes political posturing over public safety. Stoltman suggested that leaders like Pritzker are “making a big mistake” by rejecting federal assistance in cities with persistent crime issues, such as Chicago’s high murder rate.

Filitti warned that upholding Breyer’s ruling could set a precedent allowing states to block federal law enforcement by refusing cooperation, undermining the Constitution’s balance of power.

“That’s not how the Constitution works, and it’s not how you keep Americans safe,” he said. Trump’s approach, by contrast, prioritizes federal supremacy in addressing illegal immigration and crime, ensuring that federal laws are enforced even in resistant jurisdictions. His use of Title 10, rather than the Insurrection Act, demonstrates a measured approach, avoiding broader emergency powers while still achieving enforcement goals.

Addressing Immediate Threats, Not Root Causes

While critics argue Trump’s deployments target Democratic strongholds and overlook structural issues like understaffed police forces or lenient prosecutorial policies, supporters contend that immediate action is necessary to curb illegal immigration and violent crime.

Zack Smith of the Heritage Foundation noted that D.C.’s success demonstrates the effectiveness of a strong federal presence, stating, “One of the most effective ways to combat violent crime is to have police officers on the street who are empowered to appropriately do their jobs.” Smith acknowledged that long-term solutions require addressing systemic issues but argued that Trump’s strategy provides critical short-term relief, particularly in cities overwhelmed by illegal immigration’s strain on resources.

Trump’s focus on immigration enforcement, as seen in Los Angeles, directly tackles the public safety risks posed by unchecked illegal immigration, which can exacerbate local crime and overburden communities. By deploying the National Guard to support ICE operations, Trump ensures that federal priorities, such as deporting illegal immigrants, are not thwarted by local protests or sanctuary policies. As the Supreme Court considers this issue, its recent pro-Trump rulings suggest a likelihood of affirming his authority, reinforcing his ability to act decisively to protect American cities and borders.

Ted Cruz knocks Biden to his knees with a spine-tingling rebuke

Prudent Politics
-
0
Ted Cruz knocks Biden to his knees with a spine-tingling rebuke

Senator Cruz is calling out the former president. He knows how bad the previous administration was for this country.

And Ted Cruz knocks Biden to his knees with a spine-tingling rebuke.

The Biden administration’s final days were marked by a shocking abuse of power that threatens the very foundation of our constitutional republic. Reports have surfaced that former President Joe Biden and his team used an autopen—a mechanical signature device—to ram through thousands of pardons and commutations, sidestepping the sacred checks and balances meant to protect the American people. This isn’t just bureaucratic laziness; it’s a deliberate attack on the rule of law.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has taken a bold stand against this outrage, penning a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, first collected by Fox News Digital. He’s calling out Biden and his inner circle for what he sees as a blatant violation of the Constitution’s requirements for presidential pardons.

“These core Constitutional requirements, considerations, and expectations were demolished in the final months of the Biden administration for partisan and personal motives by President Biden, his family, and his top officials,” Cruz declared.

The numbers alone are staggering. In December, Biden’s team commuted the sentences of roughly 1,500 inmates and pardoned 39 others. Then, in a jaw-dropping move, they issued another 2,500 commutations in a single day—the most ever by any president. This wasn’t a thoughtful act of mercy; it was a rushed, politically charged fire sale of clemency that reeks of agenda-driven governance.

As a key member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and chair of the Subcommittee on Federal Courts, Oversight, Agency Action, and Federal Rights, Cruz is stepping up to demand accountability. He’s offered to assist Bondi in ongoing investigations a suspected abuse of the autopen. The presidential pardon power, laid out in Article II, Section 2, requires a direct chain of custody from the president himself.

“Everyone involved in the process — government officials purporting to issue a pardon, the person to whom it is being granted, judicial and law enforcement officials, and most of all the American people — should have absolute confidence a pardon was granted at the president’s explicit direction,” Cruz stated. Yet, evidence suggests Biden may not have been directly involved, casting a dark shadow over the legitimacy of these actions.

A bombshell report from Axios uncovered emails showing that even Biden’s own officials were uneasy about the process. They raised concerns about how pardons were selected and the heavy reliance on the autopen. This wasn’t a careful, case-by-case evaluation but a blanket approach based on broad criteria, raising questions about who benefited and why.

Cruz didn’t hold back, warning that Biden’s team “implemented a process that separated the President from officials responsible for signing pardons on his behalf.” This disconnect means those signing the pardons “could not know if they were doing so at the President’s direction, either on a-case-by-case basis or as a matter of criteria,” he stated. That’s not just sloppy—it’s a potential constitutional crisis.

The implications are massive. If Biden wasn’t personally directing these pardons, their validity could be in question. Cruz warned that this risks eroding public trust in the entire clemency process. “If the integrity of the clemency process was broken by Biden officials, such that the relevant actions were not taken at the President’s direction, the status of the pardons and commutations would at a minimum be cast into doubt, and the officials involved in approving and using the autopens should be held accountable,” he said.

This scandal exposes a deeper rot in Washington, where elites think they can bend the rules to suit their agendas. The autopen’s use suggests a cavalier attitude toward one of the president’s most solemn duties. Were these mass commutations a desperate bid to burnish Biden’s legacy or a favor to political allies? The American people deserve answers.

Cruz’s push for transparency is a rallying cry for patriots who believe in the Constitution’s enduring principles. The pardon power isn’t a toy for bureaucrats to play with—it’s a sacred trust that demands accountability. By relying on a machine to sign off on thousands of clemencies, Biden’s team treated justice like an assembly line, not a deliberate act of mercy.

The Justice Department is already investigating, and Cruz’s leadership ensures this won’t be swept under the rug. If it’s proven that Biden’s team acted without proper authority, the legal fallout could be seismic, potentially invalidating thousands of pardons and commutations. This isn’t just about one administration’s missteps—it’s about protecting our system from future abuses.

For too long, the establishment has assumed they can operate without scrutiny. Cruz’s stand is a reminder that the American people won’t tolerate their Constitution being trampled. The pardon process must be transparent, deliberate, and above reproach—not a backroom deal signed by a machine.

This fight is about more than just pardons; it’s about restoring faith in our institutions. The Biden administration’s reckless actions have cast doubt on the integrity of our government, and it’s up to leaders like Cruz to hold them accountable. The American people are watching, and they demand a system that respects the rule of law.

As investigations unfold, the pressure is on to uncover the truth. Was this a calculated move to push a partisan agenda, or simply gross incompetence? Either way, those responsible must face consequences. The Constitution isn’t a suggestion—it’s the bedrock of our nation, and it’s time to defend it.

Cruz’s letter is a call to action for every citizen who values justice and accountability. The Biden autopen scandal is a wake-up call: we can’t let Washington elites erode our constitutional protections.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Disgraced FBI official sold out the United States for the Biden family

Prudent Politics
-
0
Disgraced FBI official sold out the United States for the Biden family

The FBI should only have allegiance to this country and out Constitution. Instead, many of them have been compromised.

And now a disgraced FBI official sold out the United States for the Biden family.

Betrayal at the Top: FBI Official’s Leak Undermines Investigation

A Justice Department watchdog revealed that Charles McGonigal, a former high-ranking FBI official, compromised a sensitive criminal investigation by leaking details about planned arrests tied to the China Energy Fund Committee (CEFC), a group with business ties to the Biden family.

McGonigal, who led the FBI’s New York counterintelligence division from 2016 to 2018, was sentenced to 50 months in prison in 2023 for colluding with a Russian oligarch to evade U.S. sanctions. His actions, detailed in a DOJ Inspector General report released Thursday, exposed a breach of trust that disrupted a critical probe.

A Web of Warnings: How the Leak Spread

In June 2017, McGonigal met with an Albanian official, referred to as “Person B,” who worked for CEFC. During the meeting, McGonigal hinted at the FBI’s investigation, saying “something to the effect of ‘we are looking into them’ or ‘we are going after them,’” according to Person B’s 2022 FBI proffer interview.

Person B interpreted “we” as the FBI and “them” as CEFC or its affiliates. The next day, Person B traveled to Washington, D.C., and alerted CEFC executive Patrick Ho about potential arrests.

Ho was later warned by CEFC China Chairman Ye Jianming, who passed the information to another FBI target, “Target 3.” At the time, the investigation was highly confidential, known only to a small group of government personnel. In November 2017, Person B contacted McGonigal again, hesitant to attend a CEFC-sponsored event in New York due to the ongoing probe.

McGonigal advised, “Stay in Albania,” adding, “we are ready for them” or “ready for action.” While Person B claimed not to have shared this second tip, Ho attended the event and was arrested on bribery and money laundering charges upon arriving in the U.S.

Biden Family Ties and Private Investigations

Documents from the House Oversight Committee reveal that Hunter Biden, who called CEFC vice-chairman Patrick Ho the “f–king spy chief of China,” was retained by Ho for $1 million to provide “Counsel to matters related to US law and advice pertaining to the hiring and legal analysis of any US Law Firm or Lawyer.”

Hunter noted that deals with CEFC would be “interesting for me and my family,” with Hunter and his uncle James Biden earning $4.8 million from CEFC China Energy in 2017 and 2018. Amid the leaks, James Biden sought information about Ho’s status, emailing a retired Secret Service agent turned private investigator in November 2017 with the subject line, “Re new case I need ASAP—I’m in Hong Kong.”

The email requested a background check on Ho, citing concerns about a possible arrest warrant. The investigator, unable to find an active warrant, cautioned James Biden that such information could be sensitive and not always accessible.

James Biden later testified to Congress in February 2024, denying any intent to inform Ho, stating, “Absolutely not,” and claiming he sought the information “for my own edification.”

The Inspector General report does not accuse James Biden of wrongdoing and omits mention of Hunter Biden.

The report condemned McGonigal’s actions, stating, “McGonigal’s actions, while he served as a high-ranking FBI official entrusted with overseeing sensitive counterintelligence and criminal matters, were extraordinary and dishonored the FBI’s core values of integrity, accountability, and leadership expected of all FBI personnel.”

His leaks, the report concluded, “intentionally damaged an important criminal case, violated the public trust, and compromised the integrity of the FBI.”

123...169Page 2 of 169

2024 Copyright © All rights reserved.

Quick Links

Must Read

Popular Articles