Trump is working to rid America of illegal criminals. But not everyone is happy about it.

And now anti-ICE law breakers were caught hiding a horrific criminal from police.

Activists Thwart ICE Arrest of Convicted Child Rap-st in Denver

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents say they were blocked from arresting a convicted child rap-st in Denver on Friday after anti-ICE activists intervened and tipped him off.

The suspect, Jose Reyes Leon-Deras — a Salvadoran national previously convicted of child r-pe in Italy — was reportedly under surveillance by ICE when the Colorado Rapid Response Network shared agents’ locations on social media.

“During our surveillance of Leon, members of Colorado Rapid Response arrived on scene and alerted him to law enforcement’s presence, which allowed him to escape arrest,” ICE said in a statement posted to X.

“Groups like this interfere with ICE’s ability to keep communities safe.”

ICE confirmed they are still searching for Leon-Deras and have asked the public for assistance in locating him — but warned against approaching him directly.

Activist Group Shared Agents’ Whereabouts Online

According to ICE, Colorado Rapid Response posted real-time updates to Facebook about where agents were operating and what types of vehicles they were driving, effectively helping the fugitive evade capture.

The agency criticized such actions as dangerous and disruptive to law enforcement efforts aimed at removing violent criminals from communities.

The incident highlights the growing friction between federal immigration authorities and local activist groups in sanctuary jurisdictions, where anti-ICE sentiment is particularly strong.

Tensions Rise Nationwide Amid Trump Deportation Plans

The confrontation comes as protests against ICE intensify nationwide in response to former President Donald Trump’s pledge to launch mass deportation operations if reelected.

Shortly after Trump’s 2024 win, Denver Mayor Mike Johnston reiterated the city’s sanctuary status and vowed to resist mass deportations by organizing local law enforcement and even 50,000 residents “stationed at the county line.” Johnston called it a “Tiananmen Square moment.”

Anti-ICE demonstrations have escalated beyond Denver. On Wednesday, activists in Portland attempted to block access to an ICE facility, launching fireworks and shining lasers at officers, according to Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin.

In Los Angeles, protests two weeks earlier turned violent when rioters set vehicles on fire, hurled rocks and concrete at law enforcement, and shut down highways. In response, Trump ordered the deployment of thousands of National Guard troops.

China has been meddling behind the scenes. And they’re almost ready to unleash another surprise.

Now these mysterious shipments from China have huge ramifications for America.

China’s Suspicious Flights Raise Alarms for Americans

The sighting of multiple Boeing 747s departing China for Iran since June 14, 2025, as tracked by FlightRadar24, has sparked concerns that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) may be aiding Iran’s regime amid Israel’s strikes on its nuclear sites.

These “mystery transport planes,” reported by The Telegraph, vanished from radar near Iran after crossing Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, despite listing Luxembourg as their destination.

President Donald Trump’s resolute stance, reiterated on June 18, 2025, that “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon,” ensures vigilant oversight to protect American security.

His administration’s success in achieving zero illegal immigrant releases in May 2025, per The Post, reflects a broader commitment to safeguarding U.S. interests against threats like China’s potential meddling, which could destabilize the region and harm American allies.

China’s Strategic Ties to Iran Under Scrutiny

The flights, potentially carrying cargo or personnel, highlight China’s troubling alliance with Iran, cemented by a 2021 25-year cooperation deal, per Fox News Digital.

Robert Greenway, Heritage Foundation’s Center for National Defense director, noted on “The Ingraham Angle” that 43% of China’s oil comes from the Middle East, much from Iran, bought at discounted rates to fuel its economy and military.

A recent explosion at Iran’s Bandar-Abbas port, linked to Chinese missile propellant, per Greenway, raises questions about Beijing’s role.

While Greenway suggested the flights might be evacuating Iranian assets rather than delivering arms, China’s silence on the conflict, as reported by Reuters on June 17, fuels suspicion.

Trump’s proactive leadership, including a 95% drop in border “gotaways” per CBP in February 2025, contrasts with China’s opaque actions, which threaten American safety by bolstering a hostile regime.

Doubts Persist Amid Trump’s Steady Hand

Atlantic Council fellow Tuvia Gering, posting on X on June 16, downplayed the flights as routine cargo routes by a Luxembourg-based company, landing in Turkmenistan, not Iran, per flight data.

However, the CCP’s history of exploiting global systems, like its sanctioned oil trade, per a June 2025 Bloomberg report, keeps concerns alive.

Trump’s measured approach, stating on June 18, “Yes, I may do it. I may not do it. … Iran’s got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate,” shows strategic restraint while prioritizing American security.

His regret over Iran’s missed chance to negotiate earlier—“Why didn’t you negotiate with me two weeks ago? You would have had a country”—underscores his diplomatic edge.

It’s a dangerous business going after criminals. And sometimes it gets messy.

Now a massive attack on ICE agents left Trump fuming mad.

ICE Officers Face Rising Threats in Protecting Americans

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers are enduring a staggering 500% surge in assaults, as reported by Breitbart News on June 19, 2025, yet their commitment to safeguarding American communities remains unshaken.

A recent incident saw an ICE officer dragged 50 yards by a car while arresting an illegal alien sex offender, per DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin.

“Every day the men and women of ICE put their lives on the line to protect and defend the lives of American citizens,” she told Breitbart.

The officer is expected to recover fully, and the suspect was apprehended, showcasing ICE’s resilience.

This follows the agency’s success in achieving zero illegal immigrant releases in May 2025, a 93% drop from May 2024’s 117,905 apprehensions, per The Post.

ICE’s efforts, including a Nashville raid netting 95 criminals among 196 arrests, per The Daily Wire, directly enhance public safety by removing dangerous individuals from U.S. streets.

Antifa Riots Target ICE, Escalate Tensions

Violent attacks on ICE facilities, like the Antifa-led riot in Portland, Oregon, on June 18, 2025, reported by The Daily Wire, forced agents to deploy rubber bullets and flash bangs to protect their building.

Similar unrest in Los Angeles, Seattle, and San Francisco prompted President Trump to deploy the National Guard and Marines, a move criticized by California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, per Fox News.

These incidents highlight the dangers ICE faces in upholding immigration laws.

McLaughlin pointed to Democratic leaders’ rhetoric as a catalyst, stating, “Democrat politicians like Hakeem Jeffries, Mayor Wu of Boston, Governor Tim Walz, and Mayor Bass of Los Angeles are contributing to the surge in assaults … through their repeated vilification and demonization of ICE.”

ICE’s steadfast response, backed by Trump’s law-and-order policies, ensures communities are shielded from threats, unlike the permissive stances of some Democratic officials.

Democratic Policies Fuel Risks to Public Safety

The hostility toward ICE was exemplified when Nashville Mayor Freddie O’Connell doxxed federal agents in May 2025, claiming it was a “mistake,” though DHS disputed this, with McLaughlin asserting, “There’s zero chance it was a mistake and there will be repercussions.”

O’Connell’s frustration with a weeklong ICE raid that removed 95 criminals, including gang members, underscored a disconnect, as DHS noted he was “protecting illegal aliens and gang members over his constituents.”

This contrasts with Trump’s support for ICE, which has driven a 600% increase in criminal migrant arrests, per a February 2025 House Committee on Homeland Security report.

The media is always trying to get Trump and his cabinet. But they flipped the script this time.

Because the White House Press Secretary dropped a major bomb that is turning heads’

Leavitt Defends Trump’s Supporters Against Crockett’s Claims

On June 19, 2025, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt sharply rebuked Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) during a briefing, responding to the congresswoman’s claim that President Donald Trump’s supporters are “mentally ill.”

Prompted by a question from The Daily Wire’s Mary Margaret Olohan, Leavitt called Crockett’s remarks “incredibly derogatory” for targeting the nearly 80 million Americans who voted for Trump in 2024, per CNN exit polls.

“I think it’s incredibly derogatory to accuse nearly 80 million Americans of mental illness. Last time I checked, Jasmine Crockett couldn’t dream of winning such a majority of the public as President Trump did,” Leavitt said.

She highlighted the diverse makeup of Trump’s base, including “hard-working patriots, forgotten men and women, business owners, law enforcement officers, nurses, and teachers,” emphasizing their role in the America First movement.

Leavitt’s defense aligns with Trump’s strong public support, bolstered by achievements like the zero illegal immigrant releases in May 2025, as reported by The Post.

Crockett’s Comments Spark Controversy

Crockett’s statements, made on Katie Couric’s “Next Question” podcast on June 16, 2025, labeled Trump’s widespread support as evidence of a “mental health crisis” in the U.S. She argued, “We’ve got a mental health crisis in this country because everyone — no matter how you affiliate yourself — should be against Trump. Period.”

Expressing a preference for “any regular Republican” like George Bush, Crockett called for bipartisan opposition to Trump, saying, “I don’t know how far he has to go before we can come together and just say, ‘Enough is enough.’”

Her remarks, covered by Breitbart on June 17, drew criticism for dismissing the millions who back Trump’s policies, such as the 95% drop in border “gotaways” reported by CBP in February 2025. Leavitt’s retort underscored the disconnect, inviting Crockett to “go to a Trump call sometime and she can see it for herself.”

Trump’s Broad Appeal Shines Through

Leavitt’s response highlighted the strength and diversity of Trump’s coalition, which powered his 2024 victory with 53% of the popular vote, including gains among Latinos and Black voters, per AP election data.

“The America First movement, which President Trump has built, is filled with hard-working patriots … from middle America, as we all know, from where you all grew up outside of this beltway,” she said.

This reflects Trump’s success in addressing voter priorities, like the 1.7% blue-collar wage increase in his first five months, per June 2025 Treasury data.

Leavitt’s playful jab—“I hope that she continues to be a rising star, for the Republican Party at least”—suggested Crockett’s rhetoric may alienate moderates, boosting Trump’s appeal.

WATCH:

Karoline Leavitt and @MaryMargOlohan rip into Jasmine Crockett:

"I think it's incredibly derogatory to accuse nearly 80 million Americans of mental illness. Last time I checked, Jasmine Crockett couldn't dream of winning such a majority of the public." pic.twitter.com/mJCftlHdDh

— Media Research Center (@theMRC) June 19, 2025

Claiming something is true doesn’t make it so. But you won’t hear that from the Left.

And now a key Democrat Congresswoman utterly humiliated herself with one obvious lie.

Omar’s Claim on U.S. Safety Questioned

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), a prominent “Squad” member, stirred controversy on June 17, 2025, by asserting that “no one is attacking or has attacked Americans” in the context of the Iran-Israel conflict, urging against U.S. involvement in what she called Israel’s “chosen war.”

President Donald Trump, in a Truth Social post on June 16, demanded Iran’s “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!” while noting U.S. “patience is wearing thin” with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, though he held off on immediate strikes.

Omar’s claim, however, faces scrutiny as evidence mounts of Iran’s aggression toward Americans.

A Fox News Digital report on June 18 detailed Iran’s history of direct and proxy attacks, including a November 2024 Department of Justice case charging an Iranian and two New Yorkers in a plot to assassinate Trump, whom Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called Iran’s “enemy No. 1” on Fox News’ Bret Baier show.

Iran’s Documented Hostility Toward U.S. Forces

Omar’s assertion ignores a well-documented record of Iranian aggression. A 2019 Pentagon report cited by Military Times attributes 603 U.S. service member deaths in Iraq (2003-2011) to Iran-backed militias, accounting for 17% of U.S. losses.

Bill Roggio, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Fox News Digital that Iran’s support for the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan, including money, weapons, and safe havens, was “incalculable” in its impact on U.S. casualties.

In 2020, Iran fired missiles at two U.S. bases in Iraq in retaliation for the killing of Gen. Qassem Soleimani, per a CNN report.

Between October 2023 and August 2024, Iranian-backed militias launched 180 attacks on U.S. forces in Syria, Iraq, and Jordan, including a January 2024 drone strike in Jordan that killed three Americans and injured 25, as noted by Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas).

Omar’s silence on these incidents, despite inquiries from Fox News, undermines her call for peace.

Historical Precedents and Ongoing Risks

Iran’s hostility extends to historical attacks, like the 1983 Beirut bombings of the U.S. Embassy (63 deaths, 17 Americans) and multinational barracks (241 U.S. personnel), admitted by an Iranian official in 2023, per IRNA.

A 2022 U.S. District Court ruling held Iran liable for damages to families of 40 U.S. service members killed or injured in Iraq due to its terror support.

On June 14, 2025, Iranian-backed militias targeted a U.S. base in Iraq with drones, though the attack was thwarted, per Roggio’s Long War Journal.

Trump’s consideration of a “bunker buster” strike on Iran’s Fordow nuclear facility, reported by The Wall Street Journal on June 17, reflects his proactive approach to countering Iran’s nuclear ambitions and protecting U.S. interests.

The bureaucratic state is always undermining Trump. And he isn’t having it.

Now Trump excoriated the Federal Reserve for making this drastic decision.

Trump’s Bold Call for Economic Leadership

President Donald Trump, addressing reporters at the White House on June 18, 2025, sharply criticized Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell for his anticipated decision to hold interest rates steady, a move Trump sees as a misstep for the economy.

Reflecting on his 2018 appointment of Powell, Trump expressed regret, stating, “What I’m going to do is, you know, he gets out in about nine months, he has to, he gets fortunately terminated … I would have never reappointed him, (President Joe) Biden reappointed him.”

Trump’s frustration stems from Powell’s cautious approach, which he dubbed “too late Powell,” claiming, “I call him ‘too late Powell’ because he’s always too late. I mean, if you look at him, every time I did this I was right 100%, he was wrong.”

Trump’s knack for economic foresight, evident in his first term’s growth, fuels his push for a more dynamic Fed, per Bloomberg’s June 2025 analysis of his market influence.

A Vision for a Responsive Fed

Trump playfully mused about leading the Fed himself, saying, “Maybe I should go to the Fed. Am I allowed to appoint myself at the Fed? I’d do a much better job than these people.”

While not a serious proposal, it underscores his belief in decisive action over Powell’s hesitancy.

The Fed’s expected decision to maintain rates, reported by Reuters on June 18, reflects concerns over a cooling economy, potential inflation from Trump’s proposed tariffs, and Middle East tensions.

Trump, however, argues Powell’s delays harm American workers and businesses, a view echoed by Fox Business’ June 2025 coverage noting public support for his economic agenda.

Trump clarified he won’t fire Powell before his term ends in May 2026 but made clear he won’t reappoint him, criticizing Biden’s 2022 decision to do so, hinting at political motives: “I don’t know why that is, but I guess maybe he was a Democrat.”

Championing Economic Growth

Trump’s critique aligns with his broader economic strategy, which has driven a 1.7% real wage increase for blue-collar workers in his first five months, per Treasury data reported by The Post in June 2025.

His push for lower rates aims to sustain this momentum, contrasting with Powell’s conservative stance, which some analysts, like those at CNBC in May 2025, argue risks stifling growth.

Trump’s first term saw robust job creation and stock market gains, often credited to his pressure on the Fed, and he’s signaling a return to that playbook.

By highlighting Powell’s missteps, Trump positions himself as the steward of a thriving economy, ready to install a Fed leader who shares his vision for cutting rates and boosting American prosperity when Powell’s term ends.

Noem was rushed to the hospital in a scary scene on Tuesday. Now we’ve finally received an update.

Because Kristi Noem’s team issued a critical update from the hospital.

Homeland Security Secretary Hospitalized for Allergic Reaction

U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem was hospitalized on June 17, 2025, following an allergic reaction, according to department spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin.

“She is alert and recovering,” McLaughlin stated, noting the hospital visit was precautionary. Noem, 53, oversees a department of approximately 260,000 employees responsible for immigration enforcement, airport security, disaster response, and other critical functions.

The incident occurred amid Noem’s high-profile tenure, during which she has frequently traveled and maintained an active social media presence.

Reuters reported on June 18 that Noem was discharged later that day and resumed her duties, with no further details provided on the cause of the reaction.

Role in Immigration Policy and Recent Controversy

As a key figure in President Trump’s Cabinet, Noem has been a prominent advocate for his mass deportation initiative.

She regularly accompanies immigration enforcement operations and has appeared in public service announcements urging undocumented immigrants to depart voluntarily. Last week, a press conference in California sparked controversy when U.S. Senator Alex Padilla (D-CA) was forcibly removed by Noem’s Secret Service detail while attempting to address her about immigration raids.

Video footage, aired by CNN on June 12, shows a Secret Service agent grabbing Padilla’s jacket, shoving him out of the room, and subsequently handcuffing him in a hallway.

The Secret Service described Padilla as a potential “attacker,” while Homeland Security labeled his actions “disrespectful political theater.”

Noem, speaking to Fox LA on June 11, called the incident unfortunate but said she had a “great” follow-up conversation with Padilla. Padilla, in a June 17 Senate floor speech, recounted the event emotionally, criticizing the administration’s immigration approach.

Background and Prior Incidents

Before her appointment as Homeland Security Secretary, Noem served two terms as South Dakota’s governor and was a U.S. Representative, consistently aligning with Trump’s agenda.

She requested the Homeland Security role to focus on Trump’s priority of border security, per a January 2025 Politico profile.

Earlier this year, on Easter Sunday, Noem’s purse—containing $3,000 in cash, her driver’s license, passport, keys, and Homeland Security badge—was stolen during a family dinner.

The Washington Post reported on April 3, 2025, that a suspect was arrested and charged with aggravated identity theft, robbery, and fraud in federal court. The department clarified the cash was intended for family gifts and Easter activities.

The United States has plenty of enemies. And they’re always scheming.

But now the FBI uncovered a bombshell infiltration that could turn America upside down.

Uncovering a Chinese Plot to Tilt 2020

FBI Director Kash Patel dropped a bombshell on Congress, handing over a stack of documents exposing an alleged Chinese scheme to meddle in the 2020 election with thousands of fake US driver’s licenses.

The mainstream media might brush this off as old news, but Patel’s move rips the veil off a murky plot that reeks of foreign interference. A confidential source tipped off the FBI around August 2020, claiming the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aimed to use these bogus licenses to flood mail-in ballots for Joe Biden.

While details remain shadowy, the FBI’s own spokesperson confirmed to The New York Post that the plot was real enough to raise alarms, yet intelligence reports were mysteriously yanked before they could see daylight.

Patel, undeterred, declassified the report and shipped it to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) for a closer look. “The FBI has located documents which detail alarming allegations related to the 2020 U.S. election, including allegations of interference by the CCP,” Patel declared on X.

A Trail of Fake Licenses and Recalled Reports

The scale of the alleged scheme is staggering. Around the time the FBI caught wind of it, US Customs and Border Protection intercepted nearly 20,000 counterfeit driver’s licenses.

That’s no small number, especially when you consider Biden’s razor-thin victories in swing states like Arizona (10,000+ votes), Georgia (12,000+ votes), and Wisconsin (20,000+ votes).

Grassley, a longtime skeptic of the FBI’s handling of this intel, pushed for answers, suspecting the bureau didn’t dig deep enough despite the smoking gun of fake IDs. “Specifically, these include allegations of plans from the CCP to manufacture fake driver’s licenses and ship them into the United States for the purpose of facilitating fraudulent mail-in ballots — allegations which, while substantiated, were abruptly recalled and never disclosed to the public,” Patel told Just the News.

Grassley’s team confirmed they’ve got the documents, sparked by a whistleblower’s legally protected disclosures, and are now demanding the FBI explain why the original report was buried and by whom.

“Lastly, explain why the FBI under your predecessor required the original IIR to be destroyed, whether this practice is consistent with the FBI’s past and current practice, and how it comports with federal record preservation requirements,” Grassley pressed in a letter to Patel.

Patel’s Push for Transparency

Patel’s tenure at the FBI’s helm is shaking up the bureau’s secretive ways, and this document dump is proof. He’s vowed to drag long-hidden truths into the open, especially for lawmakers like Grassley who’ve battled the agency’s stonewalling.

The issue of fake Chinese-made IDs isn’t new—back in 2012, senators including Grassley and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) sounded alarms when 1,700 counterfeit licenses were nabbed at Chicago’s O’Hare Airport. Yet, the 2020 plot’s recall raises red flags about whether the FBI was complicit in sweeping it under the rug.

“Thanks to the oversight work and partnership of Chairman Grassley, the FBI continues to provide unprecedented transparency at the people’s Bureau,” Patel said.

Grassley’s camp is now pushing for more internal FBI communications to uncover who pulled the plug on the investigation and why.

The media has been attacking Trump for years. But they always pretended it was genuine journalism.

Now an ABC reporter said the quiet part out loud about mainstream media bias.

Shattering the Myth of Objectivity

Terry Moran, freshly ousted from ABC News, didn’t mince words in a raw Substack chat with The Bulwark’s Tim Miller. The former reporter, unceremoniously dumped after a fiery anti-Trump X post, scoffed at the sacred cow of journalistic “objectivity.”

Calling himself a “centrist” and “Hubert Humphrey Democrat,” Moran waved off right-wing critics who claim his outburst exposed a liberal bias festering in mainstream media.

“My own feeling is that you don’t sacrifice your citizenship as a journalist. Your job is not to be objective,” he said, dismantling the idea that reporters should be emotionless robots. He sneered at the notion of a “Mount Olympus of objectivity” where some elite class of scribes floats above society’s mess.

“We’re all in this together. What you have to be is fair and accurate,” he argued, pointing to his tense April interview with Trump as proof he can walk that line.

Backing Pelley’s Battle Cry

Moran didn’t stop at torching objectivity. He threw his full weight behind CBS News’ Scott Pelley, whose viral Wake Forest commencement speech last month lit up the internet for its unapologetic jab at the Trump administration.

“I thought Scott was absolutely spot on,” Moran said, reveling in his newfound freedom to “help in that good work.”

Pelley’s address was a Molotov cocktail, warning graduates of a creeping “insidious fear” strangling truth, DEI, and free speech.

“In this moment, this morning, our sacred rule of law is under attack. Journalism is under attack. Universities are under attack. Freedom of speech is under attack,” Pelley thundered, urging students to fight back against a government he implied was betraying Lincoln’s vision of “of the people, by the people, for the people.”

Moran, now unshackled from ABC’s leash, said Pelley’s words filled him with “joy” and a sense of purpose to join the resistance.

Owning the X Post That Ended It All

Moran’s June 8 X post, labeling Trump and Stephen Miller “world-class haters,” was the match that burned his ABC career to the ground. He doesn’t regret it.

“This, while very hot, is an observation, a description that is accurate and true,” he told Miller, defending his choice of “strong language” to call out Trump’s “venom and lies” that “debase” public discourse.

The post, since deleted, led to a swift suspension and then a pink slip from ABC, where he’d toiled since 1997. Reflecting on the fallout, Moran stood firm:

“I thought about it in my own conscience first. And I thought, as I tell you, I wrote it because I thought it was true. And at the end of the day, when all the bad stuff has happened, my children will know that whatever it means, it means that.” For Moran, the cost of speaking out was steep, but the truth was worth it.

Politicians should show some class. But not all of them always do.

Now a Democrat was caught on camera engaging in this disgusting act.

Lawmaker’s Reckless Post Fuels Outrage Over Political Violence

North Carolina State Rep. Julie von Haefen, a Democrat, ignited a firestorm by sharing a video on X from a Raleigh “No Kings” protest, featuring a grotesque image of a guillotine sign with what appeared to be President Donald Trump’s severed head adorned with a powdered wig, alongside another head marked with a swastika.

The post, which many viewed as glorifying violence, drew sharp condemnation, especially as American taxpayers fund the salaries of lawmakers expected to uphold civility, not inflame division.

“Political violence is not okay — the Left should stop encouraging it,” Rep. Mark Harris (R-NC) declared, echoing the sentiments of those appalled by von Haefen’s decision to amplify such imagery.

The Libs of TikTok account on X flagged the post as “sick,” tagging the FBI, prompting von Haefen to delete her X account and repost an edited version of the video on Facebook, omitting the offensive image.

Critics argue that taxpayers shouldn’t be footing the bill for elected officials who promote such inflammatory content, especially in a climate already scarred by political violence.

Von Haefen’s Backpedaling Amid Bipartisan Condemnation

Facing backlash, von Haefen issued a statement claiming, “Yesterday, I posted a video on social media containing crowd photos from the No Kings protest in Raleigh. One of the images of a protestor holding a sign was inappropriate, and I later edited the video to remove the photo.”

She referenced the tragic Minnesota shootings, where House Democrat leader Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed, adding, “Let me be clear: I condemn political violence in all forms.”

Yet, her initial decision to share the image—especially after two assassination attempts on Trump in 2024—has been slammed as tone-deaf and irresponsible.

“Her disgraceful behavior fails to meet the standards expected from House members and sets a dangerous precedent in an already volatile political climate,” said North Carolina House Speaker Destin Hall, who is exploring legal measures to address von Haefen’s actions.

The North Carolina GOP demanded her resignation, arguing that taxpayers deserve representatives who unite rather than divide. Von Haefen’s post, seen as endorsing violent imagery, has fueled calls for accountability, with critics noting that public funds should not support lawmakers who exacerbate tensions.

A Pattern of Provocation in a Taxpayer-Funded Arena

The controversy recalls comedian Kathy Griffin’s 2017 stunt, where she posed with a mock severed Trump head, sparking widespread outrage.

Von Haefen’s actions, coming from an elected official, carry even graver weight, especially as taxpayers fund the platform she misused. With political violence escalating—evidenced by the Minnesota tragedy and Trump’s near-assassinations—her post is seen as a betrayal of public trust.

“My focus remains on bringing people together and fighting for the values that matter to North Carolinians,” von Haefen claimed, but her critics argue that sharing such imagery undermines that goal and squanders taxpayer resources on divisive politics.

As Hall considers “next steps” to ensure such behavior isn’t repeated, the incident underscores a broader demand: elected officials, sustained by taxpayer dollars, must reject extremism and foster unity, not amplify dangerous rhetoric in an already polarized nation.

The United States hasn’t fought a major war in years. But that could change now.

Because the US Senate convened as the threat of war hit a critical level.

Congress Scrutinizes U.S. Role in Israel-Iran Conflict

As tensions flare between Israel and Iran, Capitol Hill is bracing for a heated debate on America’s involvement, with lawmakers demanding clarity on the extent of U.S. engagement and its implications for American taxpayers.

With the Senate reconvening after a weekend of missile strikes that began Thursday, bipartisan voices are pressing the Trump administration for answers on whether the U.S. is merely supporting Israel or risking deeper entanglement, potentially funding a conflict that could spiral without taxpayer consent.

“Bipartisan lawmakers have begun demanding answers from the administration about just ‘how involved’ the U.S. is in the strikes and the risks it poses for the nation,” sources note, as Congress seeks to ensure American resources aren’t dragged into another foreign war without oversight.

Lawmakers are wary of betraying President Trump’s “America First” pledge, which resonated with MAGA voters by promising to avoid costly overseas conflicts.

The deployment of U.S. refueling tankers to Europe, positioning them closer to the conflict zone, raises questions about whether taxpayers are indirectly footing the bill for a war they didn’t approve.

Balancing MAGA Principles with Support for Israel

President Trump’s handling of the crisis has garnered bipartisan support, but fault lines are emerging. Many MAGA supporters back Israel, yet they question how far U.S. involvement—both military and financial—should extend.

“Firstly, Trump campaigned on a platform of keeping the U.S. out of foreign entanglements. That pledge enthralled much of the MAGA base,” observers note, highlighting the tension between supporting an ally and preserving taxpayer resources for domestic priorities.

“Is the U.S. merely supporting Israel? Or is the U.S. more involved? And if that’s the case, at what point does Congress step in?” lawmakers are asking, emphasizing that any escalation must align with constitutional checks requiring congressional approval for war.

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) has introduced a war powers resolution to force a Senate debate and vote before any U.S. military action against Iran, ensuring taxpayers aren’t funding an unauthorized conflict. This move underscores the need to protect American resources from being siphoned into a potentially endless war.

Risks of Escalation and Taxpayer-Funded Consequences

Concerns are mounting that U.S. involvement could provoke retaliation, endangering American lives and assets.

“Moreover, there is concern that U.S. action could spark the risk of domestic terrorism in the U.S. – or strikes against American military and diplomatic assets overseas,” with soft targets like tourist hotspots also at risk. GOP lawmakers have warned Iran against retaliation, signaling that any attack would trigger a forceful U.S. response, potentially escalating costs to taxpayers.

“It is said you can’t be a little bit pregnant. But you can be a little bit at war,” sources quip, capturing the murky line between limited support and full-scale conflict.

Congress is now tasked with determining whether even limited U.S. involvement constitutes war, and whether American taxpayers should bear the financial burden of a conflict that could expand without their consent.

Kaine’s resolution aims to ensure that any escalation—military or financial—requires transparent congressional approval, safeguarding taxpayer dollars from funding a war that could spiral out of control.

The mainstream media has always had a strained relationship with the truth. At times, it’s as if they are just doing the bidding of Democrats.

And now CNN and MSNBC are totally embarrassed after being caught in a massive lie.

Media Missteps: CNN and MSNBC Downplay Anti-ICE Violence

CNN and MSNBC have faced sharp criticism for repeatedly labeling anti-ICE protests and riots across the U.S. as “mostly peaceful,” despite clear evidence of widespread unrest, according to a Media Research Center (MRC) study.

The networks’ insistence on this narrative, with 211 claims between June 7-11, glosses over violent incidents, including flash mob-style looting in Los Angeles, arson of police vehicles in New York City, and a car plowing through demonstrators in Chicago.

“No reporter acknowledged any link between the peaceful and violent elements of the crowds. The rioters were exclusively framed as ‘rogue actors,’ or ‘lone wolves,’ and there was never any assertion that they might share common cause with the more peaceful individuals,” said MRC’s Bill D’Agostino, who noted CNN’s 123 claims and MSNBC’s 88 overshadowed the reality of businesses boarding up and law enforcement making mass arrests.

Selective Reporting Ignores Escalating Chaos

The MRC study revealed that CNN and MSNBC consistently minimized the violence in cities like Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, Washington, North Carolina, Missouri, Texas, Indiana, Colorado, and Georgia, where anti-ICE protests turned destructive.

Videos and photos of torched police vehicles, vandalized businesses, and clashes with law enforcement flooded the internet, yet the networks stuck to their “mostly peaceful” mantra.

D’Agostino pointed out that only CNN’s Jake Tapper, on June 7, briefly referred to the Los Angeles chaos as a “riot.”

The networks’ refusal to connect the violent acts to the broader protests, instead blaming nebulous “rogue actors,” has drawn accusations of bias, particularly as they failed to note that the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines was targeted solely at the violent elements, not peaceful demonstrators.

National Guard and Marines Deployed Amid Media Silence

While CNN and MSNBC emphasized the “peaceful” nature of the protests, they largely ignored the necessity of federal intervention to curb the escalating violence.

“There was also no instance in which a reporter acknowledged that the National Guard and Marines had been mobilized exclusively to address the violent elements of the crowd,” D’Agostino observed, highlighting how the networks criticized the use of military force against “peaceful protesters” without acknowledging the context of looting, vandalism, and attacks on police.

This selective framing, coupled with the networks’ reluctance to label the unrest as riots, has fueled perceptions that CNN and MSNBC are more focused on pushing a narrative than reporting the full scope of the disorder, which has disrupted communities and strained law enforcement resources nationwide.