Home Blog Page 2

Bill Maher hits Democrats upside the head with a surprise they never saw coming

Prudent Politics
-
0
Bill Maher hits Democrats upside the head with a surprise they never saw coming

Maher has broken with the radical Left. Now he’s going on offense.

And Bill Maher hit Democrats upside the head with a surprise they never saw coming

Maher’s Blunt Advice: Democrats Need to Muzzle Hollywood Elites to Salvage Their Image

Comedian Bill Maher has delivered a stark warning to Democrats, urging them to distance themselves from celebrity endorsements that only alienate everyday voters. Pointing to Hollywood as the hub of out-of-touch progressive extremism, Maher argues that these stars’ vocal activism is dragging the party down, especially in a political landscape where common-sense appeals win elections. This critique highlights how Democrats’ cozy relationship with fame-obsessed liberals often backfires, prioritizing performative wokeness over relatable policies that resonate with the broader American public.

“Hollywood [is] sort of the epicenter of the woke left. I don’t think they’re doing the Democratic party any favors,” Maher said. He added, “If Democrats want to win elections in the future, job one, tell the celebrities to ‘Just shut the f—k up. You’re not helping. You don’t strike people in most of the country as sensible or in touch with reality.’”

Examples abound, like celebrities Natasha Lyonne, Mark Ruffalo, and Jean Smart donning “Be Good” pins at the Golden Globes to commemorate Renee Nicole Good, killed in a confrontation with an ICE agent in Minneapolis—a gesture that underscores the disconnect between elite virtue-signaling and real-world concerns.

Hollywood’s Petty Backlash Against Maher Exposes Leftist Intolerance

Maher’s willingness to call out excesses on the left has earned him scorn from his peers, revealing the thin-skinned nature of Hollywood’s progressive bubble. At the Golden Globes, comedian Wanda Sykes took a swipe at him while presenting the best stand-up comedy award, for which Maher was nominated with his HBO special *Is Anyone Else Seeing This?*. This kind of sniping illustrates how Democrats’ celebrity allies often stifle dissent, preferring echo chambers over honest debate—a tactic that only reinforces voter skepticism toward the party’s elitist leanings.

“Bill Maher, you give us so much. But I would love a little less,” Sykes quipped. Accepting on behalf of winner Ricky Gervais, she added, “Ricky Gervais says he would like to thank God. And the trans community.”

Maher, unfazed, attributes his lack of awards to his candid style: “I speak freely, and this woke town f–king hates that. And that’s okay. I’ve made my peace with that.” In his special, he skewers universities as “four-year daycare [centers] for the crybullies of the privileged” and notes, “You wonder why the left catches more jokes from me? They changed, not me, OK?”

He also slammed the Golden Globes for snubbing Joe Rogan in podcast categories: “It was typical and predictable and also ridiculous that [Joe Rogan] wouldn’t be nominated in a category that he dominates.”

Maher Pushes for Centrism as Democrats Cling to Extremes

Beyond celebrities, Maher advocates for Democrats to embrace more balanced governance, criticizing one-party dominance in places like California where unchecked liberal policies have led to widespread issues. His praise for figures like Gov. Gavin Newsom comes with a plea to shift centerward, exposing how Democrats’ reluctance to marginalize their radicals continues to cost them politically. Meanwhile, Maher offers a nuanced take on the Trump era, refusing to succumb to blanket hatred—a refreshing contrast to the knee-jerk opposition from many on the left.

“California could stand for a lot more centrist policies,” Maher said, adding, “It’s just not a good thing when one party completely controls anything. That’s certainly true of the Republicans also, who are drunk with power in Washington, overstepping their bounds and doing things that are now making them unpopular. I would love to see both sides marginalize their crazies.”

On Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass: “Do I think she’s done a great job? No. But all cities are messy.” Regarding Newsom: “I think he’s a really great politician, and I’m always imploring him to move to the center. I think if a Democrat like Newsom moves more to the center, it’s good for the party and it’s good for the country.”

Commenting on Newsom’s memes and humor: “At the end of the day, that kind of stuff makes no difference except, maybe politically it’s fun to watch. Does it change anything in an election? I don’t think so. I don’t hate it, I don’t love it, I don’t care. It’s silly. It’s political theater.”

As *Real Time with Bill Maher* kicks off its 24th season with guests like Major General Paul Eaton, Sen. John Kennedy, and Kasie Hunt, Maher notes Trump’s agenda-setting power: “It’s a new year, but what hasn’t changed is that Donald Trump still controls the agenda. Much as you may not want to, we all will be talking about whatever he puts on the agenda. We didn’t think it would be Greenland, but it is this week. We didn’t think it would be war in Minneapolis, but it is.”

On Trump’s actions: “I really don’t like what’s going on with ICE, as most Americans don’t. I really don’t like what’s going on with the political retribution. But, you know, Venezuela, do I hate it? No, not completely.” He adds, “If you’re the kind of people who hate oppression, well, I mean, that’s a pretty big boot to lift off people’s heads. If Cuba goes next, that would be good.”

Reflecting on dining with Trump: “I don’t have Trump derangement syndrome. Having said that, there’s just a lot of stuff I don’t like, and I’m going to call it out.” He contrasts, “My whole personality, unlike a lot of the people out here, isn’t just Trump. I don’t hate everything.”

Radical Democrats were dealt a fatal blow they’ll never recover from

Prudent Politics
-
0
Radical Democrats were dealt a fatal blow they’ll never recover from

The Left is losing its grasp on power. And the numbers aren’t even close.

Now Radical Democrats were dealt a fatal blow they’ll never recover from.

Bari Weiss Delivers Ratings Surge at CBS News Amid Left-Wing Backlash

Bari Weiss, the new Editor-in-Chief of CBS News, has scored a notable victory with the network’s flagship broadcast hitting its highest viewership in years.

On January 19, 2026, CBS Evening News with anchor Tony Dokoupil drew 6.4 million total viewers—the program’s largest audience since 2021—and averaged 803,000 viewers in the key adults 25-54 demographic, according to Nielsen Big Data + Panel.

CBS News highlighted the milestone in a press release shared on X: “RATINGS: @CBSEveningNews with Tony Dokoupil delivers 6.4 million total viewers on Jan. 19 – its largest audience for the broadcast since 2021. The CBS News flagship evening broadcast also averaged 803K in the key adults 25-54 demographic, according to Nielsen Big Data + Panel…”

This strong performance stands out against ongoing criticism from former CBS staffers and progressive media outlets, who have accused Weiss of pushing for more balanced coverage that deviates from traditional left-leaning editorial slants.

The ratings spike suggests her changes may be resonating with a broader audience seeking less partisan reporting.

Weiss’s Push for Even-Handed Journalism Sparks Internal and External Revolt

Weiss has faced intense pushback since taking the helm, including an open letter signed by about 200 former CBS employees and industry figures urging Paramount CEO David Ellison to safeguard the network’s independence from what they called her “clumsy editorial interference.”

A recent controversy involved her decision to delay and add context to a 60 Minutes segment on a prison in El Salvador, citing the need for a response from the Trump administration—moves critics labeled as interference.

Former CBS anchor Dan Rather commented on her leadership: “It is also hard to believe Weiss will be an equitable steward of the storied news division …” Comedian David Letterman described CBS News as a “wreck,” claiming its integrity had been “eviscerated by these idiots that have taken it over.”

Other outlets, including The Guardian and The New York Times, have portrayed her tenure as chaotic, with one CBS journalist quoted as saying “there is blood in the water.” At the Golden Globes, host Nikki Glaser joked that CBS News was “America’s newest place to see BS news.”

Weiss has also implemented stricter newsroom accountability, including a memo requesting detailed weekly work-hour logs from staff.

Ratings Vindication for Weiss as Network Seeks Broader Appeal

The January 19 numbers provide concrete evidence that Weiss’s approach—emphasizing fairness and context in reporting—may be drawing viewers back to CBS Evening News.

While the broadcast still trails competitors like NBC and ABC in overall averages, this peak performance counters narratives of decline under her leadership and highlights the potential for renewed interest when networks move away from one-sided framing.

As CBS continues to navigate its transformation, these figures offer a clear metric: audiences are tuning in, suggesting that balanced journalism can win back trust in a polarized media landscape.

Trump was given a huge gift from the last person he ever expected

Prudent Politics
-
0
Trump was given a huge gift from the last person he ever expected

President Trump has made many enemies. But some are starting to see the light.

Now Trump was given a huge gift from the last person he ever expected.

Hirsi Ali Champions Trump’s Davos Wake-Up Call on Radical Threats

Renowned Somali-born activist and critic of radical Islamism, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, has come out in strong support of President Donald Trump’s powerful address at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where he spotlighted the “existential attack” facing Western civilization.

Hirsi Ali, who has long warned about the dangers of unchecked Islamist ideologies, hailed Trump’s speech as a much-needed dose of reality for global elites, emphasizing how his leadership is confronting threats that others have ignored for too long. This endorsement underscores Trump’s ability to rally influential voices in the fight against extremism, bolstering his America-first policies on the world stage.

“President Trump is right: we are under existential attack,” Hirsi Ali wrote in a post on X. “The Woke West has been asleep at the wheel. Trump’s speech at Davos is a wake-up call. Listen to him.”

Her praise aligns with Trump’s stark warnings about the alliance between radical Islamists, the Chinese Communist Party, and leftist ideologies eroding Western values—issues Hirsi Ali has dedicated her career to exposing.

Trump’s Unflinching Davos Message Resonates with Truth-Seekers Like Hirsi Ali

In his Davos remarks, President Trump didn’t hold back, declaring an “existential attack on our civilization” and urging leaders to recognize the perils of complacency.

His speech, which drew applause from some attendees while ruffling feathers among establishment figures, highlighted the need for strong borders, cultural preservation, and decisive action against ideological subversion.

Hirsi Ali’s commendation validates Trump’s approach, showing how his bold rhetoric is inspiring those who’ve faced these threats firsthand and reinforcing why his return to the White House has revitalized global security discussions.

“We are under attack by radical Islamists, by the Chinese Communist Party, and by the woke leftists who are destroying our culture from within,” Trump said in his speech. “This is an existential attack on our civilization, and we must fight back.”

Hirsi Ali echoed this sentiment, adding in her post: “Trump understands the threat better than most. His words at Davos cut through the nonsense.”

Building Alliances: Trump’s Leadership Draws Praise from Unlikely Quarters

Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s background—as a former Muslim who fled Somalia, sought asylum in the Netherlands, and became a vocal advocate for women’s rights and against honor killings—makes her endorsement particularly poignant.

Having faced threats for her views, she sees in Trump a leader willing to name the problems others dodge for political correctness.

This support from a respected international figure like Hirsi Ali highlights Trump’s skill in forging coalitions against common enemies, further cementing his legacy as a defender of freedom and Western ideals amid rising global tensions.

All hell broke loose after Michelle Obama broke back onto the political scene

Prudent Politics
-
0
All hell broke loose after Michelle Obama broke back onto the political scene

The Obamas never seem to go away. They aren’t done with trying to influence America.

Now all hell broke loose after Michelle Obama broke back onto the political scene.

Michelle Obama’s Tone-Deaf Advice Dismisses the Value of Full-Time Motherhood

In yet another eyebrow-raising appearance, former First Lady Michelle Obama used her January 21, 2026, interview on the “Call Her Daddy” podcast to discourage young mothers from prioritizing family over career—portraying children as inherently ungrateful for any sacrifices made on their behalf.

Her comments, delivered amid discussions of her own experiences raising Malia and Sasha while navigating high-profile roles, come across as dismissive of traditional family choices, suggesting that staying home full-time leads to regret once kids inevitably “close the door” and move on without appreciation.

This perspective feels particularly out of touch, especially from someone who benefited from immense privilege and support during her husband’s presidency.

“Let’s be more honest about the struggle … I am constantly telling young mothers it’s coming. You don’t have to get off your career track. And I don’t even recommend it,” she said. “Because kids grow up fast. And then they’re gone. You’ve sacrificed everything. And you know, when they leave, they leave. They close the door and act like you never sacrificed.”

She doubled down, warning of the emptiness that follows: “Because now what am I going to do? I devoted everything to you. And now I’ve got to fill my time. So I encourage people to hang in there and keep something for yourself throughout this process.”

Out-of-Touch Elitism: Children as “Ungrateful” for Maternal Devotion

Obama’s framing reduces profound acts of love and sacrifice to a bad investment, implying that full-time mothers who “devote everything” are setting themselves up for disappointment because kids will grow independent and fail to acknowledge the effort.

While she acknowledged her own career interruptions and pay cuts during Barack Obama’s time in office—still managing to work as a lawyer, run a nonprofit, author books, and raise “really sane kids”—her advice leans heavily on long-life expectancy (“if you live until you’re 80, 90, there’s so much time”) as justification for never fully stepping back. This overlooks the deep fulfillment many women find in dedicated motherhood, instead painting it as a risky path to irrelevance and resentment toward one’s own children.

“Hey, look, if you live until you’re 80, 90, there’s so much time. And I tell people, look, I had to get off a track and take pay cuts and come back, sacrifice, ’cause my husband was president … But in the midst of that, I still manage to be a lawyer, run a nonprofit … be an author … raise really sane kids who, you know, aren’t perfect, but they’re really, really good,” she said. “So there is time, but we have to give ourselves a lot more grace in the process.”

The subtle jab at children as self-absorbed ingrates—”They’re like, ‘I remember you. I don’t need you anymore,’ right?”—rings particularly harsh, especially given her platform and the scrutiny her own family has faced.

True Fulfillment Comes from Family Choices, Not Elite Careerism

While Obama urges women to “keep something for yourself” and maintain career momentum, her remarks subtly undermine the millions of mothers who choose to pause or scale back professional lives for the irreplaceable role of raising the next generation.

Many find profound purpose and lasting bonds in that devotion—bonds that endure beyond childhood independence—rather than viewing it as a sacrifice wasted on “ungrateful” kids.

Her advice, rooted in personal experience under extraordinary circumstances, feels more like projection than universal wisdom, reinforcing a career-first mindset that devalues homemaking and full-time parenting. In an era when families face mounting pressures, a more balanced message—one that honors all valid paths for women—would serve far better than one that casts doubt on the gratitude and legacy of dedicated mothers.

Don Lemon is humiliated after he made this braindead statement on camera

Prudent Politics
-
0
Don Lemon is humiliated after he made this braindead statement on camera

Lemon is trying to claw back his relevance. But this isn’t the attention he wants.

Because Don Lemon is humiliated after he made this braindead statement on camera.

Lemon’s Inflammatory Accusations Target Harassed Churchgoers

Former CNN anchor Don Lemon, who was embedded with anti-ICE protesters during their disruption of a Sunday service at Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, has drawn criticism for his sharp comments on the parishioners.

In an interview with the “I’ve Had It” podcast, Lemon accused the church members of entitlement rooted in white supremacy, stating: “I think people who are in religious groups like that — it’s not the type of Christianity that I practice — but I think they’re entitled, and that entitlement comes from white supremacy.” He added: “They think this country was built for them, that it’s a Christian country.”

The incident involved protesters storming the sanctuary, chanting slogans, and confronting attendees over claims that a pastor had ties to ICE.

Lemon livestreamed parts of the event and later interviewed Pastor Jonathan Parnell. Video evidence reportedly showed Lemon had prior knowledge of the group’s plans, despite his claims of journalistic detachment.

DOJ Scrutiny and Lemon’s Defense

The Department of Justice, through Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon for Civil Rights, announced an investigation into potential violations of the federal FACE Act related to desecrating a house of worship and interfering with Christian worshippers.

Lemon responded to the scrutiny by calling it an intimidation tactic, saying: “I said I don’t understand how I became the face of it when I was a journalist. I do understand that… I’m the biggest name there.”

He attributed the focus on him to his identity, quoting a staffer: “Don, you’re a gay black man in America, and you have a platform. And you’re the biggest name. Of course you’re going to be the person they single out… And they’re gonna make the headline because it plays to their base. And their base is full of racist, bigoted homophobes.”

Broader Context of the Disruption

The protest tied into ongoing anti-ICE demonstrations in the Twin Cities, following the January 7 fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good during an encounter with an ICE agent.

Protesters targeted the church based on allegations linking a pastor to immigration enforcement.

Lemon’s participation and subsequent framing of the churchgoers as problematic have fueled backlash, with critics arguing his rhetoric shifts blame from the disruption to the victims of the harassment while he dismisses accountability concerns.

Tim Walz is quaking in his boots after Trump called up thousands of US soldiers

Prudent Politics
-
0
Tim Walz is quaking in his boots after Trump called up thousands of US soldiers

Minnesota’s government is aiding violent rioters. There’s only one solution.

And now Tim Walz is quaking in his boots after Trump called up thousands of US soldiers.

Trump’s Bold Stand for Law and Order in Minnesota

Under President Trump’s decisive leadership, the administration is readying 1,500 elite troops from the U.S. Army’s 11th Airborne Division—specialists in challenging environments—for possible deployment to Minnesota, as confirmed by a senior U.S. official.

This proactive measure comes amid escalating chaos from anti-ICE protesters harassing federal agents in the Twin Cities, highlighting Trump’s commitment to safeguarding those enforcing our nation’s laws against radical agitators.

The Pentagon’s preparedness underscores the administration’s no-nonsense approach to restoring peace, especially after a massive fraud scandal prompted the deployment of 3,000 federal agents last year.

“The Department of War is always prepared to execute the orders of the Commander-in-Chief if called upon,” Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement to Fox News.

Trump’s firm warning on Truth Social set the tone: “If the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of I.C.E., who are only trying to do their job, I will institute the INSURRECTION ACT.”

Strategic Restraint Amid Rising Tensions

Even as protests intensify following the January 7 incident where activist Renee Nicole Good was fatally shot while reportedly attempting to ram an ICE agent, President Trump has shown measured restraint, emphasizing that invoking the Insurrection Act—last used effectively during the 1992 Los Angeles riots—is a powerful tool he’s prepared to wield only if necessary.

His administration’s advance orders for the Alaska-based division demonstrate foresight in protecting federal operations, while Trump’s Friday comments reflect his confidence in local authorities stepping up, avoiding unnecessary escalation.

“I believe it was Bush, the elder Bush, he used it, I think 28 times,” Trump told reporters while departing the White House. “It’s been used a lot. And if I needed it, I’d use it. I don’t think there’s any reason right now to use it, but if I needed it, I’d use it. It’s very powerful.”

This balanced strategy contrasts with the reluctance of some Republicans, like Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who expressed hope that local officials could handle the situation without federal intervention, saying: “Hopefully the local officials working with not only the federal law enforcement, ICE and other agencies, but also the local law enforcement officials, will be able to settle things down.”

Defending Federal Patriots Against Agitators

Trump’s readiness to deploy troops builds on his proven track record of prioritizing national security and supporting ICE “Patriots” amid confrontations fueled by protesters in Minneapolis and St. Paul. With incidents like the detention of Aliya Rahman near the shooting scene, the president’s actions aim to deter further violence and ensure agents can combat illegal immigration without fear.

By preparing forces while holding back on the Insurrection Act, Trump exemplifies strong, principled governance that puts American safety first, even as critics downplay the threats facing our border enforcers.

Gavin Newsom will never recover from this utter embarrassment

Prudent Politics
-
0
Gavin Newsom will never recover from this utter embarrassment

California is a laughing stock. It’s why they can’t seem to keep anybody in the state.

And now Gavin Newsom will never recover from this utter embarrassment.

San Francisco Official Rolls Out Questionable ‘Video Game’ Tool for Homelessness

Amid growing frustration with California’s persistent homelessness crisis, a member of the San Francisco Homelessness Oversight Commission has unveiled an interactive website billed as a simulation to unpack the city’s convoluted services and policies.

Sharky Laguana, the commission’s elected data officer, presented the tool as an attempt to clarify the flow of individuals through the system, zeroing in on elements like supportive housing and public health resources, based on data from the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing.

Laguana outlined its intent in a video: “I am the elected data officer for the San Francisco Homeless Oversight Commission, and this is my report, which is going to try and take a big picture look at how people flow into and out of the services that we provide to the homeless population here in San Francisco. San Francisco’s homeless population has been roughly 8,000 people for several years now.”

Interactive Models Expose Systemic Shortcomings

The site includes two playable models for users to tinker with. The first dives into permanent supportive housing, illustrating links between yearly unit additions, monthly occupant turnover, and typical residency duration.

The second explores trade-offs in public health spending, showing how a capped budget impacts aid distribution.

Laguana highlighted the persistent issues: “Our budget for homelessness has increased significantly during this time, so why are we not seeing reduced homelessness? To answer that question, we need to first understand that we’re actually talking about a lot more than 8,000 people.”

He continued: “…Our inflow is increasing faster than our outflow. This is not sustainable over the long run. We’ve been able to keep the homeless population stable by increasing our budgets, which has allowed us to provide more services and more housing to more people. But the picture for future budget increases looks tough.”

He suggested tweaks: “If we can increase the flow within the system, that would help us maximize the number of people we can help and ultimately help reduce the number of homeless people on our streets.”

California’s Democrat-Led Efforts Fall Short Amid Data Doubts

Despite ballooning budgets—nearly $850 million for the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing in fiscal year 2024-25, dipping slightly to $786 million the following year—San Francisco’s homeless count hovers stubbornly around 8,000.

The simulation, while educational, stops short of offering real fixes, reflecting deeper flaws in Democrat-dominated policies that pour money in without measurable gains.

On a statewide level, under Governor Gavin Newsom’s watch, touted reductions like a 9% drop in homelessness are increasingly viewed with skepticism due to shaky data and questionable metrics.

This city-specific gadget, though innovative, underscores the broader failures of California’s liberal leadership, where endless spending and creative tools mask a lack of tangible progress in tackling the root causes.

Over 80 Republicans joined with Democrats for a massively consequential vote

Prudent Politics
-
0
Over 80 Republicans joined with Democrats for a massively consequential vote

The Republican Party is filled with RINOs. There’s no low too low for them.

And now over 80 Republicans joined with Democrats for a massively consequential vote.

Uniparty Betrayal: House Rejects Push to Defund Controversial NED

In a disappointing display of establishment resistance, the House of Representatives voted down an amendment to eliminate $315 million in taxpayer funding for the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and related State Department programs.

On January 14, 2026, Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) introduced the measure as part of a larger government spending package, aiming to strip what critics call a notorious deep state slush fund.

The amendment failed decisively, 127-291, with 81 Republicans crossing over to join Democrats in preserving the money. This outcome keeps the funding intact—for now—as the bill heads to the Senate. The NED, originally created during the Reagan era to promote democracy abroad, has faced mounting accusations of straying far from its mission into partisan territory.

Exposing the “Slush Fund” Allegations and Misuse of Funds

Critics argue that NED has become a vehicle for global censorship, domestic propaganda, and anti-conservative activities, far removed from genuine democracy promotion.

Reports highlight how the organization funneled money to groups like the Global Disinformation Index in 2020, which blacklisted conservative media outlets as disinformation risks, cutting off their ad revenue and targeting right-leaning voices.

Rep. Eli Crane laid out the case on the House floor: “Although its name suggests a force for good, its mission has drifted far from its Cold War origins. This is a classic tactic of the swamp, where bad policy and corruption hide behind a noble title… We’ve learned that this organization has engaged in global censorship, domestic propaganda, and regime change politics.”

The White House, under President Trump, has recommended fully defunding NED, pointing to evidence of it bankrolling attacks on Republicans and blacklisting conservative outlets. Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) echoed the frustration: “Congress shouldn’t be giving $315 million to the National Endowment for Democracy. We are not the world’s ATM… And yet far too many in Congress seem to think otherwise—especially when we’re asked to fund leftist vanity projects.”

These concerns paint NED as an unaccountable outlet for wasting American taxpayer dollars on agendas that often undermine U.S. interests and conservative principles at home and abroad.

Conservatives Vow to Keep Fighting Despite Setback

After the vote, Rep. Crane didn’t mince words about the cross-aisle coalition that saved the funding: “Tonight, the Uniparty rejected my amendment to defund NED… [Eighty-one] ‘republicans’ voted with democrats to fund this rogue organization that fuels global censorship and domestic propaganda.”

The defeat highlights ongoing internal GOP tensions, where a solid bloc of conservatives—mostly from the more principled wing—backed the defund effort, only to be thwarted by moderates siding with Democrats. Supporters of fiscal responsibility and America First priorities see this as another example of why bloated, questionable foreign spending needs scrutiny, especially when domestic needs go unmet.

While Democrats defended NED’s work in areas like documenting war crimes in Ukraine or fighting corruption elsewhere, skeptics question whether these noble-sounding efforts justify the unchecked flow of hundreds of millions in U.S. funds to an organization accused of bias and overreach. The fight isn’t over—conservatives are signaling they’ll continue pressing to rein in what they view as a wasteful and ideologically skewed slush fund.

America made an alarming move that signals war is inevitable

Prudent Politics
-
0
America made an alarming move that signals war is inevitable

Trump has been making massive moves. He’s set to make history.

And now America made an alarming move that signals war is inevitable.

Protective Measures Prioritize American Lives

The Trump administration has ordered the withdrawal of some U.S. military personnel from key bases in the Middle East, including Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar—America’s largest facility in the region—as tensions with Iran continue to escalate. This prudent step follows explicit threats from Iranian officials, who have warned of attacks on U.S. forces if America intervenes in Iran’s internal affairs.

By repositioning troops and deploying a guided missile destroyer to the Persian Gulf, the administration demonstrates a smart, defensive posture that safeguards American service members while keeping options open for stronger action if needed.

The move echoes successful precedents, such as the evacuation from Al Udeid ahead of last year’s 12-day U.S.-Israel war with Iran, where advance planning minimized risks.

President Trump’s clear warnings have put the regime on notice: he has condemned Iran’s brutal crackdown on nationwide protests—now claiming over 2,500 lives since late December—and vowed that violent repression, including potential executions, would not end well for Tehran.

In a recent CBS Evening News interview, Trump stated: “We don’t want to see what’s happening in Iran happen. And, you know, if they want to have protests, that’s one thing. When they start killing thousands of people — and now you’re telling me about hanging — we’ll see how that works out for them. It’s not going to work out good.”

Firm Stance Against Iranian Threats and Regime Brutality

Iranian leaders have responded with inflammatory rhetoric, including senior adviser Ali Shamkhani’s post on X referencing past missile strikes on Al Udeid and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf’s claim that Tehran is ready to “set the region on fire” against U.S. intervention.

State TV has even broadcast direct assassination threats against President Trump, reviving memories of foiled plots in 2022 and 2024. These provocations, combined with chants of “Death to America” at pro-regime rallies, underscore why protecting U.S. personnel remains paramount.

The administration’s approach—backed by White House statements emphasizing diplomacy first but readiness to use military options when necessary—reflects Trump’s proven record of deterrence.

Karoline Leavitt noted that Trump “has shown he’s unafraid to use military options if and when he deems necessary,” while avoiding unnecessary entanglements that could endanger more lives. This measured repositioning reduces exposure at vulnerable forward bases without abandoning allies or regional commitments.

Supporting Iranian People While Keeping America Safe

Amid Iran’s economic collapse, internet blackouts, and lethal suppression of protests across all 31 provinces, Trump has urged Iranians to “keep protesting,” signaling that “help is on the way” and the regime “will pay a big price” for its atrocities.

By pulling some troops back strategically, the U.S. avoids giving Iran easy targets for retaliation while maintaining the pressure that could empower the Iranian people against a faltering theocracy.

This decision highlights Trump’s America First priorities: protecting U.S. troops, deterring aggression, and positioning the nation to respond decisively if the regime crosses red lines.

With a guided missile destroyer reinforcing naval presence in the Gulf, the administration balances caution with strength, ensuring American forces remain ready to defend national interests and support freedom in the face of a dangerous adversary.

President Trump put one country on lockdown with a devastating threat

Prudent Politics
-
0
President Trump put one country on lockdown with a devastating threat

Trump has proven he can walk the walk as well as talk the talk in Venezuela. Other nations need to listen before it’s too late.

And now President Trump put one country on lockdown with a devastating threat.

Trump’s Bold Cutoff Hits Cuba Hard

President Trump turned up the heat on Cuba this week, announcing a full stop to Venezuelan oil and money flowing to the island nation after years of what he calls their propping up dictators.

In a fiery Truth Social post, Trump laid it out plainly: “Cuba lived, for many years, on large amounts of OIL and MONEY from Venezuela. In return, Cuba provided ‘Security Services’ for the last two Venezuelan dictators, BUT NOT ANYMORE!”

This comes right after U.S. Delta Force operators raided Venezuela on January 3, nabbing strongman Nicolás Maduro, with Trump officials pointing fingers at Cuban security forces for shielding him during the operation.

Venezuela, sitting on the world’s largest oil reserves, had been Cuba’s lifeline—but no longer, thanks to Trump’s quarantine on oil shipments in and out of the country.

A Strong Hand for Venezuela, Warning for Havana

Trump didn’t stop at the cutoff.

He touted America’s role as Venezuela’s new protector, writing, “Venezuela doesn’t need protection anymore from the thugs and extortionists who held them hostage for so many years. Venezuela now has the United States of America, the most powerful military in the World (by far!), to protect them, and protect them we will.”

Last week, Trump met with oil executives to ramp up Venezuelan production and inked a potential $2 billion deal to ship up to 50 million barrels stateside, with funds locked in supervised accounts to rebuild their battered infrastructure. It’s a pragmatic move that bolsters U.S. energy security while sidelining Cuba’s influence.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, fresh off Maduro’s capture, added a pointed nudge to Havana, telling reporters: “If I lived in Havana and I was in the government, I would be concerned. At least a little bit.”

Cuba Digs In as Trump Urges a Deal

Cuba’s leadership pushed back defiantly. President Miguel Díaz-Canel fired off on X: “Cuba is a free, independent, and sovereign nation. Nobody dictates what we do.”

He went on, per translation: “Cuba does not attack; it has been attacked by the U.S. for 66 years, and it does not threaten; it prepares, ready to defend the homeland to the last drop of blood.”

Trump, undeterred, wrapped his message with a clear call: “THERE WILL BE NO MORE OIL OR MONEY GOING TO CUBA – ZERO! I strongly suggest they make a deal, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.” After decades of enmity, Trump’s approach—decisive action paired with an open door for negotiation—signals a willingness to resolve tensions on America’s terms, especially as he eyes broader stability in the region ahead of key energy and security wins.

Billions in fraud was exposed and another Democrat’s career is over

Prudent Politics
-
0
Billions in fraud was exposed and another Democrat’s career is over

Tim Walz is on the way out. But now more heads are rolling.

Because Billions in fraud was exposed and another Democrat’s career is over.

Billions in Healthcare Fraud Alleged in California Probe

A federal investigation has uncovered billions of dollars in alleged fraudulent healthcare spending in California, focusing on foreign nationals operating illegal hospice facilities, according to statements from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz during a press conference on January 9, 2026.

Dr. Oz highlighted a sevenfold increase in hospice facilities in Los Angeles County over recent years, describing it as unnatural and not linked to higher death rates.

Dr. Oz stated, “We have witnessed a sevenfold increase in hospice in LA County, sevenfold. That doesn’t happen naturally.”

He added, “There is not seven times more deaths in LA County than there were five years ago. These are fraudsters, and these do tend to be foreign influences, either Russian and Armenian gangs, mafia, that are leading a lot of these efforts.”

The fraud reportedly involves approximately 100 doctors who enroll patients in hospice care by convincing them they are terminally ill, resulting in about 100,000 people providing their Medicare numbers. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, who is leading aspects of the probe, indicated the scale in California exceeds similar issues in Minnesota, saying, “What’s happening in Minnesota pales in comparison to the level of fraud that we believe is occurring in California.”

Dr. Oz emphasized the administration’s focus, noting, “We are major focused on this issue, and I think our suspicion, our belief, is that the fraud in California will magnify whatever’s happening in Minnesota.”

Newsom’s Response to the Allegations

California Gov. Gavin Newsom pushed back against the claims in a post on X, defending his administration’s record on fraud prevention.

He wrote that he has “blocked over $125 BILLION in fraud, arrested criminal parasites leaching off of taxpayers, and protected taxpayers from the exact kind of scam artist Trump celebrates, excuses, and pardons.”

The allegations are part of broader Trump administration efforts to address waste and fraud in federal healthcare programs, including the recent appointment of a new attorney general position dedicated to tackling such issues.

Broader Context of Healthcare Fraud Investigations

The California probe is ongoing, with officials highlighting foreign influences in the schemes. No specific total dollar amount for the California fraud has been finalized publicly, but it is described as involving billions in alleged improper spending.

This comes amid national scrutiny of Medicaid and Medicare programs, where similar fraud concerns have been raised in other states like Minnesota. The press conference included officials from the Department of Justice and CMS, underscoring a coordinated federal response to these allegations.

US Congresswoman screams her head off during live Congressional hearing

Prudent Politics
-
0
US Congresswoman screams her head off during live Congressional hearing

There should at least be some decorum in politics. But it’s become far too emotional.

And now this US Congresswoman screamed her head off during a live Congressional hearing.

Pressley’s Outburst Disrupts Somali Fraud Hearing

During a House Oversight Committee session examining massive Somali-led fraud schemes in Minnesota, Democratic Massachusetts Rep. Ayanna Pressley turned the proceedings into a spectacle by aggressively confronting witnesses over unrelated pardons issued by President Donald Trump.

Pressley, fixating on Trump’s clemency for former Republican New York Rep. George Santos and Minnesota Jan. 6 defendant Brian Christopher Mock—both convicted of fraud—demanded the three Minnesota state legislator witnesses raise their hands in opposition.

She declared, “Now [Mock] claims he did these things in the name of patriotism, but really, he’s just a criminal. So raise your hand if you oppose Trump’s pardon of this Minnesota individual.”

Republican Minnesota state Rep. Kristin Robbins pushed back, saying, “Ma’am, this grandstanding nonsense is exactly what Minnesotans hate about D.C.,” and accused Pressley of diverting attention from the core issue of Somali fraud. Undeterred, Pressley snapped, “This is not grandstanding! This is accountability and you are hypocrites! So again, I will take your refusal to not … excuse me! Reclaiming my time! Reclaiming my time!” As chaos ensued, Republican South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace interjected, labeling Pressley “off the rails.”

Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer announced her time had expired, but Pressley persisted, shouting, “I’m looking for accountability and you want to run from the hypocrisy from your king and this administration!” Her theatrics overshadowed the hearing’s purpose, drawing criticism for prioritizing political point-scoring over substantive oversight.

Exposing the Scale of Somali Fraud in Minnesota

The hearing focused on a sprawling fraud scandal in Minnesota, where federal prosecutors have charged 98 individuals in schemes defrauding social services, with 85 defendants of Somali descent.

To date, 57 have been convicted, including those linked to the nonprofit Feeding Our Future, which siphoned over $350 million intended for meals for low-income children. A viral video by YouTuber Nick Shirley spotlighted ten Somali-operated daycares, such as the Quality “Learning” Center—initially misspelled as “Learing” on its sign—that collectively received millions from state programs.

The center alone got $1.9 million in 2025 and $4 million overall from Minnesota’s Child Care Assistance Program, with five of the facilities serving as Feeding Our Future meal sites that pocketed nearly $5 million between 2018 and 2021.

The revelations have intensified scrutiny on Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who recently abandoned his 2026 reelection bid amid the fallout from this oversight failure.

Democrats’ Evasive Tactics Amid National Scrutiny

While Pressley’s disruptive tactics stole the spotlight, other Democrats on the committee appeared equally reluctant to engage deeply with the fraud allegations.

Democratic Massachusetts Rep. Stephen Lynch, for instance, devoted his entire four-minute questioning slot to reminiscing about former President John F. Kennedy’s legacy, completely sidestepping the Somali fraud topic.

Critics have accused Democrats of downplaying or ignoring the scandal, which has captured national headlines and raised broader questions about accountability in social programs. The hearing’s descent into mayhem under Pressley’s lead further fueled perceptions of partisan deflection rather than genuine pursuit of solutions.

123...176Page 2 of 176

2024 Copyright © All rights reserved.

Quick Links

Must Read

Popular Articles