Home Blog Page 2

Tim Walz is quaking in his boots after Trump called up thousands of US soldiers

Prudent Politics
-
0
Tim Walz is quaking in his boots after Trump called up thousands of US soldiers

Minnesota’s government is aiding violent rioters. There’s only one solution.

And now Tim Walz is quaking in his boots after Trump called up thousands of US soldiers.

Trump’s Bold Stand for Law and Order in Minnesota

Under President Trump’s decisive leadership, the administration is readying 1,500 elite troops from the U.S. Army’s 11th Airborne Division—specialists in challenging environments—for possible deployment to Minnesota, as confirmed by a senior U.S. official.

This proactive measure comes amid escalating chaos from anti-ICE protesters harassing federal agents in the Twin Cities, highlighting Trump’s commitment to safeguarding those enforcing our nation’s laws against radical agitators.

The Pentagon’s preparedness underscores the administration’s no-nonsense approach to restoring peace, especially after a massive fraud scandal prompted the deployment of 3,000 federal agents last year.

“The Department of War is always prepared to execute the orders of the Commander-in-Chief if called upon,” Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement to Fox News.

Trump’s firm warning on Truth Social set the tone: “If the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of I.C.E., who are only trying to do their job, I will institute the INSURRECTION ACT.”

Strategic Restraint Amid Rising Tensions

Even as protests intensify following the January 7 incident where activist Renee Nicole Good was fatally shot while reportedly attempting to ram an ICE agent, President Trump has shown measured restraint, emphasizing that invoking the Insurrection Act—last used effectively during the 1992 Los Angeles riots—is a powerful tool he’s prepared to wield only if necessary.

His administration’s advance orders for the Alaska-based division demonstrate foresight in protecting federal operations, while Trump’s Friday comments reflect his confidence in local authorities stepping up, avoiding unnecessary escalation.

“I believe it was Bush, the elder Bush, he used it, I think 28 times,” Trump told reporters while departing the White House. “It’s been used a lot. And if I needed it, I’d use it. I don’t think there’s any reason right now to use it, but if I needed it, I’d use it. It’s very powerful.”

This balanced strategy contrasts with the reluctance of some Republicans, like Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who expressed hope that local officials could handle the situation without federal intervention, saying: “Hopefully the local officials working with not only the federal law enforcement, ICE and other agencies, but also the local law enforcement officials, will be able to settle things down.”

Defending Federal Patriots Against Agitators

Trump’s readiness to deploy troops builds on his proven track record of prioritizing national security and supporting ICE “Patriots” amid confrontations fueled by protesters in Minneapolis and St. Paul. With incidents like the detention of Aliya Rahman near the shooting scene, the president’s actions aim to deter further violence and ensure agents can combat illegal immigration without fear.

By preparing forces while holding back on the Insurrection Act, Trump exemplifies strong, principled governance that puts American safety first, even as critics downplay the threats facing our border enforcers.

Gavin Newsom will never recover from this utter embarrassment

Prudent Politics
-
0
Gavin Newsom will never recover from this utter embarrassment

California is a laughing stock. It’s why they can’t seem to keep anybody in the state.

And now Gavin Newsom will never recover from this utter embarrassment.

San Francisco Official Rolls Out Questionable ‘Video Game’ Tool for Homelessness

Amid growing frustration with California’s persistent homelessness crisis, a member of the San Francisco Homelessness Oversight Commission has unveiled an interactive website billed as a simulation to unpack the city’s convoluted services and policies.

Sharky Laguana, the commission’s elected data officer, presented the tool as an attempt to clarify the flow of individuals through the system, zeroing in on elements like supportive housing and public health resources, based on data from the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing.

Laguana outlined its intent in a video: “I am the elected data officer for the San Francisco Homeless Oversight Commission, and this is my report, which is going to try and take a big picture look at how people flow into and out of the services that we provide to the homeless population here in San Francisco. San Francisco’s homeless population has been roughly 8,000 people for several years now.”

Interactive Models Expose Systemic Shortcomings

The site includes two playable models for users to tinker with. The first dives into permanent supportive housing, illustrating links between yearly unit additions, monthly occupant turnover, and typical residency duration.

The second explores trade-offs in public health spending, showing how a capped budget impacts aid distribution.

Laguana highlighted the persistent issues: “Our budget for homelessness has increased significantly during this time, so why are we not seeing reduced homelessness? To answer that question, we need to first understand that we’re actually talking about a lot more than 8,000 people.”

He continued: “…Our inflow is increasing faster than our outflow. This is not sustainable over the long run. We’ve been able to keep the homeless population stable by increasing our budgets, which has allowed us to provide more services and more housing to more people. But the picture for future budget increases looks tough.”

He suggested tweaks: “If we can increase the flow within the system, that would help us maximize the number of people we can help and ultimately help reduce the number of homeless people on our streets.”

California’s Democrat-Led Efforts Fall Short Amid Data Doubts

Despite ballooning budgets—nearly $850 million for the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing in fiscal year 2024-25, dipping slightly to $786 million the following year—San Francisco’s homeless count hovers stubbornly around 8,000.

The simulation, while educational, stops short of offering real fixes, reflecting deeper flaws in Democrat-dominated policies that pour money in without measurable gains.

On a statewide level, under Governor Gavin Newsom’s watch, touted reductions like a 9% drop in homelessness are increasingly viewed with skepticism due to shaky data and questionable metrics.

This city-specific gadget, though innovative, underscores the broader failures of California’s liberal leadership, where endless spending and creative tools mask a lack of tangible progress in tackling the root causes.

Over 80 Republicans joined with Democrats for a massively consequential vote

Prudent Politics
-
0
Over 80 Republicans joined with Democrats for a massively consequential vote

The Republican Party is filled with RINOs. There’s no low too low for them.

And now over 80 Republicans joined with Democrats for a massively consequential vote.

Uniparty Betrayal: House Rejects Push to Defund Controversial NED

In a disappointing display of establishment resistance, the House of Representatives voted down an amendment to eliminate $315 million in taxpayer funding for the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and related State Department programs.

On January 14, 2026, Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) introduced the measure as part of a larger government spending package, aiming to strip what critics call a notorious deep state slush fund.

The amendment failed decisively, 127-291, with 81 Republicans crossing over to join Democrats in preserving the money. This outcome keeps the funding intact—for now—as the bill heads to the Senate. The NED, originally created during the Reagan era to promote democracy abroad, has faced mounting accusations of straying far from its mission into partisan territory.

Exposing the “Slush Fund” Allegations and Misuse of Funds

Critics argue that NED has become a vehicle for global censorship, domestic propaganda, and anti-conservative activities, far removed from genuine democracy promotion.

Reports highlight how the organization funneled money to groups like the Global Disinformation Index in 2020, which blacklisted conservative media outlets as disinformation risks, cutting off their ad revenue and targeting right-leaning voices.

Rep. Eli Crane laid out the case on the House floor: “Although its name suggests a force for good, its mission has drifted far from its Cold War origins. This is a classic tactic of the swamp, where bad policy and corruption hide behind a noble title… We’ve learned that this organization has engaged in global censorship, domestic propaganda, and regime change politics.”

The White House, under President Trump, has recommended fully defunding NED, pointing to evidence of it bankrolling attacks on Republicans and blacklisting conservative outlets. Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) echoed the frustration: “Congress shouldn’t be giving $315 million to the National Endowment for Democracy. We are not the world’s ATM… And yet far too many in Congress seem to think otherwise—especially when we’re asked to fund leftist vanity projects.”

These concerns paint NED as an unaccountable outlet for wasting American taxpayer dollars on agendas that often undermine U.S. interests and conservative principles at home and abroad.

Conservatives Vow to Keep Fighting Despite Setback

After the vote, Rep. Crane didn’t mince words about the cross-aisle coalition that saved the funding: “Tonight, the Uniparty rejected my amendment to defund NED… [Eighty-one] ‘republicans’ voted with democrats to fund this rogue organization that fuels global censorship and domestic propaganda.”

The defeat highlights ongoing internal GOP tensions, where a solid bloc of conservatives—mostly from the more principled wing—backed the defund effort, only to be thwarted by moderates siding with Democrats. Supporters of fiscal responsibility and America First priorities see this as another example of why bloated, questionable foreign spending needs scrutiny, especially when domestic needs go unmet.

While Democrats defended NED’s work in areas like documenting war crimes in Ukraine or fighting corruption elsewhere, skeptics question whether these noble-sounding efforts justify the unchecked flow of hundreds of millions in U.S. funds to an organization accused of bias and overreach. The fight isn’t over—conservatives are signaling they’ll continue pressing to rein in what they view as a wasteful and ideologically skewed slush fund.

America made an alarming move that signals war is inevitable

Prudent Politics
-
0
America made an alarming move that signals war is inevitable

Trump has been making massive moves. He’s set to make history.

And now America made an alarming move that signals war is inevitable.

Protective Measures Prioritize American Lives

The Trump administration has ordered the withdrawal of some U.S. military personnel from key bases in the Middle East, including Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar—America’s largest facility in the region—as tensions with Iran continue to escalate. This prudent step follows explicit threats from Iranian officials, who have warned of attacks on U.S. forces if America intervenes in Iran’s internal affairs.

By repositioning troops and deploying a guided missile destroyer to the Persian Gulf, the administration demonstrates a smart, defensive posture that safeguards American service members while keeping options open for stronger action if needed.

The move echoes successful precedents, such as the evacuation from Al Udeid ahead of last year’s 12-day U.S.-Israel war with Iran, where advance planning minimized risks.

President Trump’s clear warnings have put the regime on notice: he has condemned Iran’s brutal crackdown on nationwide protests—now claiming over 2,500 lives since late December—and vowed that violent repression, including potential executions, would not end well for Tehran.

In a recent CBS Evening News interview, Trump stated: “We don’t want to see what’s happening in Iran happen. And, you know, if they want to have protests, that’s one thing. When they start killing thousands of people — and now you’re telling me about hanging — we’ll see how that works out for them. It’s not going to work out good.”

Firm Stance Against Iranian Threats and Regime Brutality

Iranian leaders have responded with inflammatory rhetoric, including senior adviser Ali Shamkhani’s post on X referencing past missile strikes on Al Udeid and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf’s claim that Tehran is ready to “set the region on fire” against U.S. intervention.

State TV has even broadcast direct assassination threats against President Trump, reviving memories of foiled plots in 2022 and 2024. These provocations, combined with chants of “Death to America” at pro-regime rallies, underscore why protecting U.S. personnel remains paramount.

The administration’s approach—backed by White House statements emphasizing diplomacy first but readiness to use military options when necessary—reflects Trump’s proven record of deterrence.

Karoline Leavitt noted that Trump “has shown he’s unafraid to use military options if and when he deems necessary,” while avoiding unnecessary entanglements that could endanger more lives. This measured repositioning reduces exposure at vulnerable forward bases without abandoning allies or regional commitments.

Supporting Iranian People While Keeping America Safe

Amid Iran’s economic collapse, internet blackouts, and lethal suppression of protests across all 31 provinces, Trump has urged Iranians to “keep protesting,” signaling that “help is on the way” and the regime “will pay a big price” for its atrocities.

By pulling some troops back strategically, the U.S. avoids giving Iran easy targets for retaliation while maintaining the pressure that could empower the Iranian people against a faltering theocracy.

This decision highlights Trump’s America First priorities: protecting U.S. troops, deterring aggression, and positioning the nation to respond decisively if the regime crosses red lines.

With a guided missile destroyer reinforcing naval presence in the Gulf, the administration balances caution with strength, ensuring American forces remain ready to defend national interests and support freedom in the face of a dangerous adversary.

President Trump put one country on lockdown with a devastating threat

Prudent Politics
-
0
President Trump put one country on lockdown with a devastating threat

Trump has proven he can walk the walk as well as talk the talk in Venezuela. Other nations need to listen before it’s too late.

And now President Trump put one country on lockdown with a devastating threat.

Trump’s Bold Cutoff Hits Cuba Hard

President Trump turned up the heat on Cuba this week, announcing a full stop to Venezuelan oil and money flowing to the island nation after years of what he calls their propping up dictators.

In a fiery Truth Social post, Trump laid it out plainly: “Cuba lived, for many years, on large amounts of OIL and MONEY from Venezuela. In return, Cuba provided ‘Security Services’ for the last two Venezuelan dictators, BUT NOT ANYMORE!”

This comes right after U.S. Delta Force operators raided Venezuela on January 3, nabbing strongman Nicolás Maduro, with Trump officials pointing fingers at Cuban security forces for shielding him during the operation.

Venezuela, sitting on the world’s largest oil reserves, had been Cuba’s lifeline—but no longer, thanks to Trump’s quarantine on oil shipments in and out of the country.

A Strong Hand for Venezuela, Warning for Havana

Trump didn’t stop at the cutoff.

He touted America’s role as Venezuela’s new protector, writing, “Venezuela doesn’t need protection anymore from the thugs and extortionists who held them hostage for so many years. Venezuela now has the United States of America, the most powerful military in the World (by far!), to protect them, and protect them we will.”

Last week, Trump met with oil executives to ramp up Venezuelan production and inked a potential $2 billion deal to ship up to 50 million barrels stateside, with funds locked in supervised accounts to rebuild their battered infrastructure. It’s a pragmatic move that bolsters U.S. energy security while sidelining Cuba’s influence.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, fresh off Maduro’s capture, added a pointed nudge to Havana, telling reporters: “If I lived in Havana and I was in the government, I would be concerned. At least a little bit.”

Cuba Digs In as Trump Urges a Deal

Cuba’s leadership pushed back defiantly. President Miguel Díaz-Canel fired off on X: “Cuba is a free, independent, and sovereign nation. Nobody dictates what we do.”

He went on, per translation: “Cuba does not attack; it has been attacked by the U.S. for 66 years, and it does not threaten; it prepares, ready to defend the homeland to the last drop of blood.”

Trump, undeterred, wrapped his message with a clear call: “THERE WILL BE NO MORE OIL OR MONEY GOING TO CUBA – ZERO! I strongly suggest they make a deal, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.” After decades of enmity, Trump’s approach—decisive action paired with an open door for negotiation—signals a willingness to resolve tensions on America’s terms, especially as he eyes broader stability in the region ahead of key energy and security wins.

Billions in fraud was exposed and another Democrat’s career is over

Prudent Politics
-
0
Billions in fraud was exposed and another Democrat’s career is over

Tim Walz is on the way out. But now more heads are rolling.

Because Billions in fraud was exposed and another Democrat’s career is over.

Billions in Healthcare Fraud Alleged in California Probe

A federal investigation has uncovered billions of dollars in alleged fraudulent healthcare spending in California, focusing on foreign nationals operating illegal hospice facilities, according to statements from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz during a press conference on January 9, 2026.

Dr. Oz highlighted a sevenfold increase in hospice facilities in Los Angeles County over recent years, describing it as unnatural and not linked to higher death rates.

Dr. Oz stated, “We have witnessed a sevenfold increase in hospice in LA County, sevenfold. That doesn’t happen naturally.”

He added, “There is not seven times more deaths in LA County than there were five years ago. These are fraudsters, and these do tend to be foreign influences, either Russian and Armenian gangs, mafia, that are leading a lot of these efforts.”

The fraud reportedly involves approximately 100 doctors who enroll patients in hospice care by convincing them they are terminally ill, resulting in about 100,000 people providing their Medicare numbers. U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, who is leading aspects of the probe, indicated the scale in California exceeds similar issues in Minnesota, saying, “What’s happening in Minnesota pales in comparison to the level of fraud that we believe is occurring in California.”

Dr. Oz emphasized the administration’s focus, noting, “We are major focused on this issue, and I think our suspicion, our belief, is that the fraud in California will magnify whatever’s happening in Minnesota.”

Newsom’s Response to the Allegations

California Gov. Gavin Newsom pushed back against the claims in a post on X, defending his administration’s record on fraud prevention.

He wrote that he has “blocked over $125 BILLION in fraud, arrested criminal parasites leaching off of taxpayers, and protected taxpayers from the exact kind of scam artist Trump celebrates, excuses, and pardons.”

The allegations are part of broader Trump administration efforts to address waste and fraud in federal healthcare programs, including the recent appointment of a new attorney general position dedicated to tackling such issues.

Broader Context of Healthcare Fraud Investigations

The California probe is ongoing, with officials highlighting foreign influences in the schemes. No specific total dollar amount for the California fraud has been finalized publicly, but it is described as involving billions in alleged improper spending.

This comes amid national scrutiny of Medicaid and Medicare programs, where similar fraud concerns have been raised in other states like Minnesota. The press conference included officials from the Department of Justice and CMS, underscoring a coordinated federal response to these allegations.

US Congresswoman screams her head off during live Congressional hearing

Prudent Politics
-
0
US Congresswoman screams her head off during live Congressional hearing

There should at least be some decorum in politics. But it’s become far too emotional.

And now this US Congresswoman screamed her head off during a live Congressional hearing.

Pressley’s Outburst Disrupts Somali Fraud Hearing

During a House Oversight Committee session examining massive Somali-led fraud schemes in Minnesota, Democratic Massachusetts Rep. Ayanna Pressley turned the proceedings into a spectacle by aggressively confronting witnesses over unrelated pardons issued by President Donald Trump.

Pressley, fixating on Trump’s clemency for former Republican New York Rep. George Santos and Minnesota Jan. 6 defendant Brian Christopher Mock—both convicted of fraud—demanded the three Minnesota state legislator witnesses raise their hands in opposition.

She declared, “Now [Mock] claims he did these things in the name of patriotism, but really, he’s just a criminal. So raise your hand if you oppose Trump’s pardon of this Minnesota individual.”

Republican Minnesota state Rep. Kristin Robbins pushed back, saying, “Ma’am, this grandstanding nonsense is exactly what Minnesotans hate about D.C.,” and accused Pressley of diverting attention from the core issue of Somali fraud. Undeterred, Pressley snapped, “This is not grandstanding! This is accountability and you are hypocrites! So again, I will take your refusal to not … excuse me! Reclaiming my time! Reclaiming my time!” As chaos ensued, Republican South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace interjected, labeling Pressley “off the rails.”

Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer announced her time had expired, but Pressley persisted, shouting, “I’m looking for accountability and you want to run from the hypocrisy from your king and this administration!” Her theatrics overshadowed the hearing’s purpose, drawing criticism for prioritizing political point-scoring over substantive oversight.

Exposing the Scale of Somali Fraud in Minnesota

The hearing focused on a sprawling fraud scandal in Minnesota, where federal prosecutors have charged 98 individuals in schemes defrauding social services, with 85 defendants of Somali descent.

To date, 57 have been convicted, including those linked to the nonprofit Feeding Our Future, which siphoned over $350 million intended for meals for low-income children. A viral video by YouTuber Nick Shirley spotlighted ten Somali-operated daycares, such as the Quality “Learning” Center—initially misspelled as “Learing” on its sign—that collectively received millions from state programs.

The center alone got $1.9 million in 2025 and $4 million overall from Minnesota’s Child Care Assistance Program, with five of the facilities serving as Feeding Our Future meal sites that pocketed nearly $5 million between 2018 and 2021.

The revelations have intensified scrutiny on Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who recently abandoned his 2026 reelection bid amid the fallout from this oversight failure.

Democrats’ Evasive Tactics Amid National Scrutiny

While Pressley’s disruptive tactics stole the spotlight, other Democrats on the committee appeared equally reluctant to engage deeply with the fraud allegations.

Democratic Massachusetts Rep. Stephen Lynch, for instance, devoted his entire four-minute questioning slot to reminiscing about former President John F. Kennedy’s legacy, completely sidestepping the Somali fraud topic.

Critics have accused Democrats of downplaying or ignoring the scandal, which has captured national headlines and raised broader questions about accountability in social programs. The hearing’s descent into mayhem under Pressley’s lead further fueled perceptions of partisan deflection rather than genuine pursuit of solutions.

US Congresswoman accuses Fox News anchor of disgusting crime

Prudent Politics
-
0
US Congresswoman accuses Fox News anchor of disgusting crime

Accusations like this shouldn’t be taken lightly. If it’s true, it’s beyond the pale.

And now a US Congresswoman accused this Fox News anchor of a disgusting crime.

Ocasio-Cortez Accuses Watters of s-xual Harassment in Confrontation with Producer

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) had a heated exchange with Johnny Belisario, a producer for “Jesse Watters Primetime” on Fox News.

The producer approached her to invite her on the show.

Ocasio-Cortez declined and accused host Jesse Watters of s-xualizing and harassing her.

“He has s-xualized and harassed me on his show,” she said.

“He has s-xually harassed me on his show. He has engaged in horrific, s-xually exploitative rhetoric.”

Belisario responded, “That’s not true, Congresswoman.”

Ocasio-Cortez replied, “It is true, because he accused me sleeping– of wanting to quote, unquote, sleep with Stephen Miller. So why don’t you tell me what you think is acceptable to tell a woman? Thank you.”

She then walked away.

Later, on X, she posted, “You can either be a p-rvert or ask me to be on your little show. Not both. Good luck!”

The incident was captured on video by Pablo Manríquez of Migrant Insider.

The clip was shared by Acyn Torabi of MeidasTouch.

Background on Watters’ Earlier Comments

The accusation stems from remarks Watters made in October on “The Five.”

Watters said, “I think AOC wants to sleep with Miller.”

He continued, “I’m sorry you can’t have him. Miller is the best. I know him well socially. The man is not overcompensating.”

“He is a policy savant. I mean, this guy is confident. He battles CNN with grace and with class and provides wise counsel to the President of the United States.”

Watters also described Miller as a “s-xual matador.”

Context Involving Ocasio-Cortez’s Prior Statements on Miller

The comments followed Ocasio-Cortez’s criticism of White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller’s immigration policies.

She called him a “clown” and initially suggested he is 4’10”.

Amid backlash, she stated, “I don’t believe in body-shaming.”

Late night host breaks ranks and takes Donald Trump’s side

Prudent Politics
-
0
Late night host breaks ranks and takes Donald Trump’s side

The Left has infected a lot of the airspace. But not everyone wants to deal with it.

And now this late night host broke ranks and took Donald Trump’s side

Veteran comedian Conan O’Brien recently took aim at fellow comics who have let their disdain for President Donald Trump overshadow their craft, arguing that relentless attacks like shouting “F Trump” have turned humor into mere rage. In a candid discussion at the Oxford Union, O’Brien emphasized how such approaches undermine the true power of comedy, especially in a political landscape where Trump’s bold style has reshaped the game.

He stated, “Some comics go the route of I’m going to just say ‘F Trump’ all the time or that’s their comedy. And I think well now…you’re being co-opted because you’re so angry. You’ve been lulled. It’s like a siren leading you into the rocks. You’ve been lulled into just saying ‘F Trump. F Trump. F Trump. Screw this guy.’ And I think you’ve now put down your best weapon, which is being funny, and you’ve exchanged it for anger.”

O’Brien further elaborated on the pitfalls of abandoning wit for anger, noting, “And that person or any person like that would say, ‘Well, things are too serious now. I don’t need to be funny.’ And I think, well, if you’re a comedian, you always need to be funny. You just have to find a way. And you just have to find a way to channel that anger into a way…because good art will always be a great weapon, will always be a perfect weapon against power. But if you’re just screaming and you’re just angry, you’ve lost your best tool in the toolbox.”

This perspective underscores how Trump’s commanding presence has forced comedians to adapt or risk irrelevance, highlighting the resilience of his influence in cultural debates.

Trump’s Outlandish Edge Challenges Satirical Norms

O’Brien didn’t shy away from attributing some of comedy’s current struggles to Trump’s larger-than-life persona, which he says makes traditional parody tougher while exposing the futility of nonstop criticism.

Echoing sentiments from a 2023 interview, he remarked, “I’m really going on a limb here saying that’s his greatest crime. I think he’s hurt political comedy by being so outlandish himself. I think the January 6 thing is a blip compared to how much he’s hurt comedy.”

Yet, this admission also reveals how Trump’s dynamic approach has elevated the bar for effective satire, potentially strengthening political discourse by weeding out lazy attacks.

The former “Late Night” and “The Tonight Show” host has navigated his own brushes with controversy, including defending a Kennedy Center appearance amid Trump’s administration and jokingly offering to broker deals like Trump’s Greenland proposal by trading Florida.

These anecdotes illustrate O’Brien’s impulsive style, as he shared, “I have very strong political feelings and views, but my comedy is something that I don’t have that kind of control over. In a way, it is there’s so much of what I’ve done in my life that’s impulse.”

In this era, Trump’s unfiltered energy seems to mirror and amplify such comedic instincts, making him a formidable figure in the entertainment world.

Navigating Politics and Comedy in a Trump-Dominated Era

While O’Brien holds firm political views, including accusations against FCC Chairman Brendan Carr for allegedly biasing actions against Jimmy Kimmel and mocking Trump’s White House ballroom plans as akin to building a new Mar-a-Lago, he stresses the importance of keeping comedy distinct from raw activism.

He described the balance as “tricky,” urging comedians to wield humor as their ultimate tool against authority rather than succumbing to outrage. This advice comes at a time when Trump’s enduring popularity continues to dominate headlines, proving his ability to outpace critics and inspire a more robust form of cultural engagement.

Donald Trump smacks Russia with a reality check they never saw coming

Prudent Politics
-
0
Donald Trump smacks Russia with a reality check they never saw coming

Putin likes to think he has it all figured out. But he didn’t factor in Trump’s boldness.

And now Donald Trump smacked Russia with a reality check they never saw coming.

Trump Firmly Dismisses Russian Accusation of Ukrainian Drone Strike

President Donald Trump confidently pushed back against the Kremlin’s assertion that Ukraine launched an assault on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s residence, emphasizing U.S. intelligence findings.

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday evening while heading back to Washington from Mar-a-Lago after the holiday season, Trump declared, “I don’t believe that strike happened. There is something that happened fairly nearby, but had nothing to do with this house.”

The claim originated from Russian officials, who alleged that 91 long-range drones aimed at Putin’s property in the Novgorod area—located midway between Moscow and St. Petersburg—were intercepted, as stated by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

Clarification on Initial Response and Intelligence Assessment

Trump explained his earlier reaction following a December 29 phone conversation with Putin, where he had expressed strong disapproval, saying he “was very angry about it” and noting, “This is not the right time. It’s one thing to be offensive, it’s another thing to attack his house.”

Providing context for his shift, Trump added, “Because nobody knew at that moment. That was the first I heard about it. He said that his house was attacked. We don’t believe that happened, now that we’ve been able to check. But that was the first we ever heard about it.”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky outright rejected the story as “typical Russian lies,” aligning with a CIA evaluation that confirmed no such incident occurred.

In light of this, Russia indicated it might reassess its role in ongoing peace talks related to its 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

Trump Proposes Tough Tariffs to Curb Russian Oil Funding

Demonstrating proactive measures to weaken Russia’s war efforts, Trump highlighted plans to escalate tariffs on India to discourage its purchases of Russian oil, a major revenue stream for Putin’s military operations.

He remarked, “[Prime Minister Narendra] Modi is a good guy. He knew I was not happy, and it was important to make me happy. They do trade, and we can raise tariffs on them very quickly.”

This builds on last year’s action by the Trump administration, which imposed 50% tariffs on certain Indian products for similar reasons.

Nations like China, Turkey, and Brazil also continue to buy discounted Russian oil. Trump shared these insights during a discussion with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), a proponent of bipartisan bills allowing tariffs as high as 500% on countries engaging in such trade.

Newcomer Republican breaks onto the scene for a mad dash to the White House

Prudent Politics
-
0
Newcomer Republican breaks onto the scene for a mad dash to the White House

Trump still has a few years until the end of his term. A lot can happen in that time.

And now a Newcomer Republican broke onto the scene for a mad dash to the White House.

Youngkin Prepares to Leave Governorship Amid National Speculation

Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin concludes his single term on January 17, 2026, due to state constitutional limits on consecutive service. In his final weeks, he presented a budget highlighting accomplishments and described the state’s progress, stating: “It is a story of transformation, of promises made and promises kept.

A story of competing and winning, a story of Virginia leading,” and adding, “Virginia is stronger today than she has ever been.”

Youngkin has ruled out a 2026 Senate bid and maintains focus on current duties, while observers note his appearances at Republican events in early primary states like Iowa and South Carolina during 2025.

Record of Achievements and Political Setbacks

Supporters credit Youngkin with attracting over $150 billion in investments, implementing tax reductions, emphasizing parental rights in education, banning cellphones in classrooms, reducing regulations, and overseeing a decline in homicides.

He issued a record 399 vetoes, viewed by allies as firm resistance to Democratic legislation.

Former Governor Bob McDonnell praised him as possessing “the mettle, and I think he’s got the gravitas, and I think he’s got the record that he could certainly run for president in 2028, and I think he’ll be very, very competitive.”

However, Democrats regained full legislative control in 2025 elections, which Youngkin attributed partly to external factors like a federal government shutdown and media coverage.

Critics, including Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell, described the tenure as one where “He ran the office like he was in a perpetual campaign instead of trying to govern.”

Views on Future Role and Party Dynamics

Youngkin has expressed support for the Trump administration and left open possibilities for a Cabinet position or a 2028 presidential campaign.

Radio host John Fredericks noted: “The reality is, he governed through a MAGA lens. There’s not a decision he made in four years as governor that wouldn’t have fired up the MAGA base,” and suggested a federal role could shift perceptions: “People forget… They’re not going to remember what he did in Virginia. They’re going to remember what he did in the administration.”

Some MAGA figures remain skeptical; Steve Bannon called him an “establishment wimp.”

As Youngkin transitions out of Richmond, his next steps include potential private sector return or higher national involvement, with ongoing debate within the Republican Party about his alignment and broader appeal.

Iran surprises everyone with a sudden rocket launch no one saw coming

Prudent Politics
-
0
Iran surprises everyone with a sudden rocket launch no one saw coming

The Iranian regime is no friend to the United States. And their latest actions are a major issue.

And now Iran surprised everyone with a sudden rocket launch no one saw coming.

Iran Persists with Space Ambitions Amid Sanctions

Iran managed to orbit three homegrown satellites on December 28, 2025, relying on a Russian Soyuz rocket from the Vostochny site in Russia’s far east, a move that exposes Tehran’s ongoing defiance of international restrictions.

Iranian envoy to Russia Kazem Jalali boasted about the feat, claiming the devices were “designed and produced by Iranian scientists,” while asserting that ties with Moscow endure “despite all the sanctions and threats.”

This latest launch, the seventh using Russian vehicles, reveals how the regime circumvents isolation to bolster capabilities that raise alarms over potential military applications.

Devices Raise Concerns Over Dual-Use Technology

Dubbed Paya (or Tolou-3), Zafar-2, and Kowsar 1.5, the satellites ostensibly aid in monitoring farmland, resources, and environmental changes, with Paya at 150 kilograms marking Iran’s bulkiest yet.

Authorities tout them for civilian uses like mapping and border surveillance, but critics warn of their adaptability for espionage or targeting, especially given the regime’s track record of aggression.

Developed through local institutions and companies, these tools highlight Iran’s push for autonomy in high-tech areas, often viewed as a facade for advancing prohibited programs that destabilize the region.

Alliance with Russia Undermines Global Security

The operation amplifies the troubling bond between Tehran and Moscow, intensified since 2022 through arms deals and mutual support against Western pressures.

By leveraging the sturdy Soyuz—historically a symbol of space reliability—both authoritarian states flaunt their resistance to accountability, fueling concerns about proliferation of sensitive tech.

As the U.S. upholds firm policies to curb such threats, these developments stress the urgency of stronger measures to prevent rogue actors from endangering international peace and democratic allies.

123...176Page 2 of 176

2024 Copyright © All rights reserved.

Quick Links

Must Read

Popular Articles