Everyone can feel the effects of Biden’s economic failures. But now it seems things are only going to get worse.

And a new report details a devastating economic future because of Biden’s new plans.

A new survey has revealed that nearly 3,200 retail stores are set to close their doors in 2024, marking a significant increase from the previous year.

This alarming trend underscores the severe challenges facing the retail industry and highlights the broader economic issues plaguing the nation under the Biden administration.

According to the survey, the number of store closures has risen sharply, with major retailers such as Bed Bath & Beyond, Foot Locker, Tuesday Morning, Bath & Body Works, and Walgreens announcing multiple shutdowns.

This trend is indicative of deeper systemic problems that have been exacerbated by current economic policies.

One of the primary factors contributing to the surge in store closures is the rampant inflation that has crippled the purchasing power of American consumers.

Under President Biden’s leadership, inflation has soared to levels not seen in decades, making everyday goods and services unaffordable for many families.

As prices continue to rise, consumers are tightening their belts, leading to a decline in retail sales and, consequently, store closures.

Moreover, the administration’s failure to address supply chain disruptions has only compounded the problem.

The ongoing supply chain crisis has led to empty shelves and increased costs for retailers, who are struggling to keep their doors open.

This has forced many businesses to make the difficult decision to shut down, resulting in job losses and economic instability.

The rise in crime rates, particularly in major urban areas, has also played a significant role in the retail apocalypse.

Cities like San Francisco, Chicago, and New York have seen a dramatic increase in shoplifting and other retail crimes, making it increasingly difficult for stores to operate profitably.

The Biden administration’s lax stance on crime and its failure to support law enforcement have emboldened criminals, further hurting the retail sector.

The COVID-19 pandemic has also left a lasting impact on the retail industry. While the pandemic initially accelerated the shift towards e-commerce, the continued emphasis on lockdowns and restrictions by Democratic leaders has hindered the recovery of brick-and-mortar stores.

Many small businesses, in particular, have been unable to bounce back from the prolonged closures and reduced foot traffic, leading to a wave of permanent shutdowns.

Additionally, the administration’s push for higher minimum wages has put further strain on retailers.

While the intention behind raising the minimum wage is to improve the standard of living for workers, the reality is that many businesses cannot afford the increased labor costs.

This has led to layoffs, reduced hours, and, ultimately, store closures as businesses struggle to stay afloat.

The Biden administration’s economic policies have also failed to provide adequate support for small businesses.

The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), which was a lifeline for many businesses during the Trump administration, has been poorly managed under the current leadership.

The lack of targeted relief and support for struggling businesses has left many retailers with no choice but to close their doors.

The impact of these store closures extends beyond the retail sector.

The loss of jobs and the decline in retail spaces have a ripple effect on the broader economy.

Communities are left with vacant storefronts, reduced tax revenue, and fewer employment opportunities. This further exacerbates the economic divide and hampers the recovery of local economies.

The retail apocalypse is a clear indication that the Biden administration’s approach is not working.

It is time for a change in leadership that prioritizes economic growth, supports small businesses, and addresses the real issues facing the American people.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story and more.

The Radical Left’s understanding of foreign policy seems to be nonexistent. But now people are worried they’ve taken things too far.

Because a liberal squad member’s foreign policy comments have sparked mass outrage.

In a recent and horrifying move, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has labeled Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a war criminal, asserting that he should not be permitted to address the U.S. Congress.

Her remarks have ignited a fierce debate, highlighting the deep divisions within American politics regarding U.S. support for Israel.

This man should not be addressing Congress. He is a war criminal. And he certainly has no regard for US law, which is explicitly designed to prevent US weapons from facilitating human rights abuses.

His invitation should be revoked. It should’ve never been sent in the 1st place. https://t.co/mSrQl6jLEZ

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 19, 2024

During an interview on “The Mehdi Hasan Show,” Ocasio-Cortez did not mince words, stating, “Netanyahu is a war criminal. I believe that Netanyahu should not be invited to address Congress and should not be given an audience.”

Her comments come at a time when Netanyahu is scheduled to speak before Congress, a move that has been both welcomed and criticized by various political factions.

Ocasio-Cortez, known for her progressive stance, has been a vocal critic of Netanyahu and his policies toward Palestinians.

She argues that his actions in Gaza and the West Bank amount to war crimes under international law. “We should not be endorsing or legitimizing his behavior by allowing him to speak in such a prestigious forum,” she added.

This is not the first time Netanyahu’s potential address to Congress has sparked controversy.

In 2015, he addressed Congress without the prior approval of the Obama administration, leading to significant backlash.

This latest invitation has once again brought to the fore the contentious issue of U.S.-Israel relations and the influence of the Israeli lobby in American politics.

Ocasio-Cortez’s comments have been met with mixed reactions.

Supporters of Israel, including many Republicans and some centrist Democrats, have condemned her statements as inflammatory and disrespectful.

They argue that Netanyahu is a democratically elected leader of a key U.S. ally and should be afforded the respect and platform that comes with such a position.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) responded to Ocasio-Cortez’s remarks by saying, “Prime Minister Netanyahu has been a steadfast ally of the United States and a defender of democracy in the Middle East. It is deeply troubling to hear such inflammatory rhetoric from a sitting member of Congress.”

McCarthy went on to emphasize the importance of maintaining strong U.S.-Israel relations and cautioned against the potential fallout from Ocasio-Cortez’s comments.

The divide over Netanyahu’s address to Congress reflects broader tensions within the Democratic Party, particularly between its progressive and establishment wings.

Progressive Democrats have increasingly criticized the U.S.’s unwavering support for Israel, calling for more balanced policies that also consider Palestinian rights and aspirations.

Netanyahu’s upcoming address to Congress, if it proceeds as planned, is likely to be a focal point for these debates.

It will test the Biden administration’s handling of U.S.-Israel relations and its approach to managing the differing views within the Democratic Party.

The administration’s response to Ocasio-Cortez’s comments and the broader progressive critique will be closely watched by both domestic and international observers.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Some Supreme Court justices have been taking heat in recent months for standing up for the Constitution. But no one thought things would get this bad.

And now, a Supreme Court justice has been attacked by a Radical politician and Americans are outraged.

Recently, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton targeted Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, criticizing his Christian faith and labeling him a “fanatic.”

During a speech, Clinton referred to Alito’s religious convictions as “scary,” drawing sharp criticism from many who view her remarks as a blatant attack on religious freedom and the values held by millions of Americans.

"Alito struck me almost immediately…as a radical, as a fanatic, about his views of culture and the role of religion in our society and his religion…And I found him scary."@HillaryClinton explains how she views the current Supreme Court. Watch here: https://t.co/v3VJj3YOYh pic.twitter.com/KQu1ThNdFZ

— Democracy Docket (@DemocracyDocket) June 15, 2024

Justice Alito, known for his strong pro-America stance and commitment to his faith, has been a lightning rod for criticism from the left, particularly following his authorship of the opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade decision.

Clinton’s comments are seen by many as part of a broader attempt to undermine conservative values and the principles enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.

Clinton’s attack on Alito is not an isolated incident. Throughout her career, she has often positioned herself against traditional Christian values, advocating for policies that many people believe undermine religious freedoms.

Her recent comments only reinforce the perception that the left is engaged in a concerted effort to marginalize and silence conservative voices, particularly those rooted in faith.

In her speech, Clinton expressed fear over Alito’s influence on the Supreme Court, suggesting that his decisions are driven more by his personal beliefs than by legal principles.

This narrative is alarming to those who argue that Alito’s adherence to the Constitution and his faith are not mutually exclusive but rather complementary in guiding his judicial philosophy.

The backlash from conservatives has been swift and fierce. Prominent figures have come to Alito’s defense, highlighting the importance of protecting religious freedom and the right to hold personal beliefs without fear of public condemnation.

Many see Clinton’s remarks as an attack not just on Alito, but on all Americans who hold similar beliefs.

Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) condemned Clinton’s comments, calling them “disgraceful” and a “direct assault on religious liberty.”

He emphasized that the ability to practice one’s faith freely is a cornerstone of American democracy and that Alito’s commitment to his beliefs should be respected, not vilified.

Similarly, conservative commentator Ben Shapiro pointed out the hypocrisy in Clinton’s rhetoric, noting that while the left preaches tolerance and inclusion, it often shows little respect for conservative viewpoints, especially those rooted in Christianity.

“Clinton’s remarks are yet another example of the left’s intolerance towards anyone who dares to hold traditional values,” Shapiro said.

Justice Alito’s supporters argue that his decisions reflect a deep respect for the Constitution and the principles upon which the United States was founded.

They see his commitment to his faith as a strength, not a liability, and believe that his perspective brings valuable balance to the Supreme Court.

Alito himself has previously addressed accusations of bias, stating that his faith informs his values but does not dictate his legal reasoning.

He has underscored the importance of interpreting the Constitution as it was originally intended, a principle that resonates strongly with many conservatives who are wary of judicial activism.

Clinton’s remarks have only strengthened many Americans’ resolve to defend their beliefs and support leaders who embody the values upon which America was founded.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Radical Left never seems to want to put Americans first. And a recent move has highlighted this feeling.

Because now, a top Democrat betrays Americans with one alarming stroke of the pen.

Maryland Governor Wes Moore has sparked significant controversy by pardoning over 175,000 individuals with marijuana-related convictions.

This sweeping action, heralded by many on the left as a step towards criminal justice reform, raises critical questions about the rule of law, public safety, and the true motivations behind such mass pardons.

Governor Moore announced the mass pardon as part of a broader initiative to address what he perceives as the injustices of past drug policies.

In his statement, he emphasized that the move was aimed at correcting the wrongs of a system that disproportionately impacted minority communities. “Today, we are taking a step to right the wrongs of the past and to give people a second chance,” Moore said.

While the governor’s supporters celebrate this decision as progressive and necessary, critics argue that it is an egregious overreach of executive power.

This mass pardon effectively nullifies the judicial decisions made in over 175,000 cases, undermining the authority of the courts and the rule of law.

It also sets a dangerous precedent where the executive branch can unilaterally overturn convictions on such a massive scale without due process or individual review.

Public safety concerns are at the forefront of the criticisms.

By pardoning such a large number of individuals, the state risks releasing people who may have been involved in more serious criminal activities associated with their drug convictions.

The blanket nature of the pardon does not take into account the specifics of each case, which means individuals with violent histories or connections to larger criminal enterprises might also benefit from this action.

Furthermore, this move comes at a time when many American cities, including Baltimore, are grappling with rising crime rates.

Law enforcement agencies and public safety officials are concerned that this pardon could exacerbate the problem by putting potentially dangerous individuals back on the streets without adequate oversight or rehabilitation.

The political motivations behind Governor Moore’s decision also cannot be ignored.

With increasing pressure from progressive factions within the Democratic Party, actions like this are seen as attempts to curry favor with a particular voter base ahead of future elections.

It’s a calculated move designed to appeal to those who support broad criminal justice reforms, even at the expense of public safety and the integrity of the legal system.

Moreover, the economic implications of this pardon are significant.

The enforcement of drug laws and the incarceration of offenders have substantial financial costs, but the sudden release and expungement of records also come with expenses.

There will be a need for additional resources to manage the transition, support services, and potential monitoring of those pardoned.

This raises questions about the responsible allocation of taxpayer dollars, especially in a state already facing budgetary challenges.

The pardon’s impact on victims and their families is another crucial aspect.

Many of these convictions were not just about possession but included distribution and other related crimes that have broader social implications.

For the victims of drug-related crimes and their families, this pardon could be seen as a betrayal, undermining the justice they sought and received through the legal system.

As Maryland moves forward, it’s imperative to balance the pursuit of reform with the need to uphold the rule of law and ensure the safety and well-being of all its residents.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The 2024 election race is shaping up to be a close contest. But no one thought things would get this bad.

And a presidential candidate has suffered a devastating loss, and it could change everything.

In a shocking new development, independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will not be allowed to participate in the June debate between former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden, according to recent reports.

Kennedy, an outspoken critic of the Biden administration and a candidate who has garnered significant grassroots support, was informed that he did not meet the criteria to participate in the debate.

The requirements, set by the debate organizers, reportedly include a certain threshold of poll support and fundraising, which Kennedy has not reached.

However, supporters argue that these criteria are designed to exclude outsiders and maintain the status quo.

The exclusion of Kennedy from the debate has drawn criticism from various quarters, with many seeing it as an attempt by the Left to protect Biden.

Kennedy, known for his advocacy on issues such as vaccine safety and environmental protection, has been a thorn in the side of the Democratic establishment.

His exclusion underscores the challenges faced by non-establishment candidates in gaining visibility and legitimacy in a highly controlled political landscape.

Moreover, the decision to exclude Kennedy highlights a broader issue of political bias and the manipulation of democratic processes to favor certain candidates.

The mainstream media often set the rules in ways that marginalize alternative viewpoints and limit the choices available to voters.

This manipulation undermines the principles of fair competition and open debate, which are essential to a healthy democracy.

The Left continues to twist things every way they can to level the playing field for Biden.

Kennedy’s exclusion from the debate denies him the ability to speak out against his former party and will help protect Joe Biden from any extra scrutiny.

This lack of engagement is detrimental to the democratic process, as it prevents voters from hearing diverse perspectives and making informed choices.

This exclusion raises questions about the role of debate organizers and the criteria they use to determine participation.

The lack of transparency and the seemingly arbitrary nature of these criteria suggest that they can be manipulated to serve the interests of the Radical Left.

This manipulation erodes public trust in the electoral process and fuels cynicism and disengagement among voters.

The Democratic Party has shown a tendency to suppress any criticism and maintain a tight grip on its narrative.

This approach stifles healthy debate and innovation within the party, making it less responsive to the needs and concerns of its diverse constituency.

The treatment of Kennedy is reminiscent of the challenges faced by other non-establishment candidates in recent years.

From RFK Jr. to Tulsi Gabbard, candidates who challenge the status quo have often been marginalized and excluded from key debates and discussions.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story and more.

With the Leftist media doing everything they can to cover for Biden, it has been hard to find any truth. But now, the true story is coming from a place no one expected.

And a former Obama associate has turned on Democrats and revealed the truth about Biden.

In a stunning political shift, a major fundraiser for former President Barack Obama has defected to support Donald Trump, citing significant dissatisfaction with President Joe Biden’s leadership.

This defection highlights growing concerns among some Democratic supporters over Biden’s handling of various national issues.

Allison Huynh, a significant donor to Obama’s 2008 and 2012 campaigns, has openly criticized Biden, stating that the current administration’s performance has been woefully inadequate.

Former major Obama fundraiser Allison Huynh flips to Trump, says that Biden is “asleep at the wheel”.

pic.twitter.com/8rT0acFYMs

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) June 19, 2024

Huynh, who played a crucial role in rallying financial support for Obama, has now switched allegiance, believing that Trump’s policies are more effective in addressing the pressing challenges facing the country.

Huynh has accused Biden of being “asleep at the wheel,” arguing that the President has failed to address critical issues such as the economy, border security, and international relations.

Her remarks echo a growing sentiment among disillusioned Democrats who feel that the Biden administration has not delivered on its promises.

The economy, according to Huynh, is in dire straits under Biden’s leadership. She pointed to skyrocketing inflation, supply chain disruptions, and rising unemployment rates as indicators of the administration’s failure.

Huynh emphasized that Trump’s economic policies, including tax cuts and deregulation, had previously stimulated growth and created jobs, contrasting sharply with the current economic downturn.

Huynh also expressed deep concerns over Biden’s handling of the border crisis. The surge in illegal immigration, he argued, has overwhelmed border states and strained resources, leading to increased crime and insecurity.

Huynh, an immigrant herself, believes that Trump’s strict immigration policies were more effective in controlling the border and ensuring national security.

Huynh‘s switch to Trump is particularly significant given her previous role in the Democratic Party.

Her decision to support Trump reflects a broader discontent among many former Democrat supporters who feel that Biden has not lived up to expectations.

This shift could signal potential challenges for the Democratic Party as it seeks to rally its base ahead of the 2024 elections.

Huynh’s defection underscores the growing division within the Democratic Party.

Many Democrats are increasingly frustrated with the administration’s inability to tackle key issues, and Huynh’s defection is a clear manifestation of this dissatisfaction.

Her public endorsement of Trump is likely to energize the former President’s supporters and could potentially sway undecided voters.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Early polls show that Donald Trump has a commanding lead over Joe Biden. And the Left knows they need all the help they can get.

But now an entire demographic has betrayed Biden, and Democrats are scrambling.

A recent poll reveals a troubling trend for President Joe Biden as his support among black voters in key swing states, Michigan and Pennsylvania, is in a sharp decline.

Conducted by East Carolina University for the Center for Racial and Political Action, the poll highlights that Biden’s approval rating has fallen significantly among a demographic that has been crucial for Democratic victories.

In Michigan, only 56% of black voters currently approve of Biden, a stark drop from the overwhelming support he received in 2020. Similarly, in Pennsylvania, his approval has dwindled to 61%.

These figures are concerning for the Democratic Party as black voter turnout and support have historically been pivotal in securing victories in these states.

The poll indicates that the economy and crime are major issues influencing black voters’ disapproval.

Many respondents cited dissatisfaction with the administration’s handling of economic policies, rising inflation, and safety concerns in their communities.

This dissatisfaction reflects broader national concerns but is particularly pronounced among black voters in these critical states.

Additionally, the poll sheds light on a growing sentiment among black voters that the Biden administration has not delivered on key promises.

Issues such as criminal justice reform and economic equity, which were central to Biden’s campaign, remain unresolved in the eyes of many voters. This has led to a sense of disillusionment and frustration.

Republicans see an opportunity to capitalize on this shift. GOP outreach efforts are intensifying in black communities, emphasizing economic policies, school choice, and crime reduction strategies.

The Republican National Committee (RNC) has been actively engaging with black voters, hoping to chip away at the Democratic stronghold on this demographic.

Former President Donald Trump has also been vocal about his efforts to appeal to black voters, often highlighting his administration’s achievements in criminal justice reform and economic initiatives aimed at minority communities.

Trump’s messaging resonates with many black voters who feel left behind by the current administration.

The decline in Biden’s support among black voters could have significant implications for the 2024 election.

Both Michigan and Pennsylvania are crucial battleground states that could determine the outcome of the presidential race.

Democrats are aware of the challenge and are likely to intensify their efforts to address the concerns of black voters. Initiatives focusing on economic development, criminal justice reform, and community safety are expected to be at the forefront of their strategy.

However, rebuilding trust and enthusiasm among black voters will require substantial and tangible progress on these issues.

The poll’s findings serve as a wake-up call for the Biden administration and the Democratic Party.

The erosion of support among black voters in key swing states underscores the need for a more effective and responsive approach to the issues that matter most to this vital constituency.

The decline in Biden’s support among black voters in Michigan and Pennsylvania is a significant development that could reshape the dynamics of the upcoming election.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Left hates the truth and they will stop at nothing to cover up how harmful their Radical agenda is. But now, they have nowhere else to run.

And Liberals have been dealt a major blow by a judge who has exposed their dark secrets.

In a significant development concerning journalistic freedom and transparency, a Nashville judge has seemingly reconsidered his earlier threats to punish a journalist for publishing articles about the Covenant School shooter.

This move comes amid mounting public pressure and a fierce debate over the balance between national security and the public’s right to know.

The controversy began when a journalist from The Daily Wire published articles containing details about the Covenant School shooter.

The judge initially threatened to penalize the journalist, citing concerns over the potential impact on ongoing investigations and the perceived need to protect sensitive information.

The articles in question provided insights into the shooter’s background and motivations, sparking a public outcry for more transparency and accountability.

Judge Robert J. Smith initially reacted to the publication with severe admonitions. He argued that the release of such information could hinder ongoing law enforcement efforts and potentially compromise the investigation.

The threat of punitive measures against the journalist raised alarms among media organizations and free speech advocates, who viewed it as an overreach of judicial power and a direct attack on press freedom.

The judge’s threats were met with widespread condemnation from various quarters, including media watchdogs, First Amendment advocates, and the general public.

Critics argued that punishing a journalist for reporting on a matter of public interest sets a dangerous precedent.

They stressed the importance of a free press in holding power to account and ensuring that the public remains informed about issues that directly affect their safety and security.

In a notable shift, Judge Smith appears to have backed off from his initial stance.

While not completely retracting his concerns, he has indicated a willingness to reconsider the punitive measures against the journalist.

This reconsideration comes after significant backlash and a recognition of the potential implications for press freedom.

Legal experts and advocacy groups have weighed in on the judge’s apparent change of heart.

Many see it as a positive step toward reaffirming the importance of journalistic freedom in a democratic society.

“It’s a victory for the First Amendment and a reminder of the critical role that journalists play in our democracy,” said a spokesperson for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for future interactions between the judiciary and the media.

This incident is part of a broader context where media freedom and the role of the press in society are under scrutiny.

In recent years, journalists have faced increasing threats and pressures from the Radical Left, making the defense of press freedoms more crucial than ever.

Judge Smith’s reconsideration of his threats to punish a journalist over articles about the Covenant School shooter is a significant moment for press freedom.

It serves as a reminder of the vital role that journalists play in informing the public and holding power to account.

As this case continues to unfold, it will be closely watched by media organizations, legal experts, and advocacy groups.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Radical Left are constantly putting everyone and everything before America. But now, they have taken things too far.

And Biden’s covert plot against America is turning heads.

In another shocking and anti-American move, President Joe Biden is set to announce new immigration rules that could provide permanent residency to up to 500,000 illegal immigrants.

The Biden administration is preparing to roll out these new rules aimed at giving illegal immigrants a pathway to permanent residency.

This initiative appears to be part of Biden’s broader strategy to address the immigration crisis that has plagued his presidency since day one.

The plan involves expanding eligibility for temporary protected status (TPS), which grants temporary legal status and work authorization to immigrants from countries experiencing armed conflict, environmental disasters, or other extraordinary conditions.

By broadening the criteria for TPS and easing the process of obtaining it, the administration hopes to offer a more permanent solution for those who have been residing in the U.S. without legal status for years.

The administration has also indicated that they will streamline the application process for green cards for those who qualify under the new TPS criteria.

This move could impact up to half a million individuals who have been living in the shadows, offering them a chance to step into the light.

This announcement has been met with severe criticism from many Americans. \

They argue that this move will only encourage more illegal immigration and undermine the rule of law.

Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) tweeted, “Biden’s open border policies have already caused a crisis at our southern border. Now he wants to reward those who broke our laws with permanent residency. This is a slap in the face to every legal immigrant and American citizen.”

Former President Donald Trump also weighed in, stating, “This is just another example of the Biden administration’s radical open borders agenda. Instead of securing our borders and protecting American jobs, they’re focused on giving amnesty to those who broke our laws to get here.”

Critics also argue that this policy change will further strain an already overburdened border security system.

The Biden administration’s handling of the border crisis has been widely panned, with record numbers of illegal crossings and apprehensions occurring since he took office.

By offering a pathway to permanent residency for illegal immigrants, conservatives fear that this will create a perverse incentive for even more people to attempt to enter the country illegally.

They argue that this policy effectively rewards illegal behavior and sets a dangerous precedent.

The economic and social implications of this policy change are also a significant concern.

Critics argue that providing permanent residency to half a million illegal immigrants will have a profound impact on American workers, particularly those in low-wage jobs.

They fear that this influx of newly legalized workers will drive down wages and make it harder for American citizens to find employment.

There are also concerns about the strain on public services.

With many states and localities already struggling to provide adequate services to their residents, the addition of hundreds of thousands of new permanent residents could exacerbate these issues.

Many people argue that this policy will lead to higher taxes and reduced quality of services for American citizens.

It is also expected that this policy change will face legal challenges.

Conservative legal groups are already preparing to file lawsuits to block the implementation of these new rules.

They argue that the Biden administration is overstepping its authority and circumventing Congress, which has the sole power to create and amend immigration laws.

The coming weeks and months will undoubtedly see intense political and legal battles as both sides fight over the future of America’s immigration system.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Biden administration has a history of appointing criminals. But this most recent incident exposes how bad things are.

And now, a Biden appointee has made a massive mistake and exposed the entire administration.

In a shocking turn of events, an ex-Biden appointee and current Texas Democratic candidate, Shervin Jones, has been exposed for orchestrating a hate hoax by creating fake social media accounts to post racist comments about himself.

The revelation comes as a major blow to the credibility of Jones and raises serious concerns about the lengths some individuals will go to manipulate public perception and gain political leverage.

According to a new bombshell report, Shervin Jones, who served as a Biden appointee in the U.S. Department of Energy, set up fake social media accounts to post derogatory and racist remarks aimed at himself.

Hate Hoax: A former Biden White House appointee and Democrat candidate for a county commissioner position in Texas was arrested and charged after an investigation found he allegedly created fake Facebook accounts to send himself racist, hateful messages. Taral Patel @TaralVPatel… pic.twitter.com/RlvI80SKQO

— Andy Ngô 🏳️‍🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) June 17, 2024

The motive behind this deceitful act appears to be an attempt to garner sympathy and political support by portraying himself as a victim of racial hatred.

The report reveals that Jones used these fake accounts to post inflammatory comments and then pointed to these posts as evidence of the racism he allegedly faced.

This deceitful strategy aimed to manipulate public sentiment and create a false narrative to further his political ambitions.

Shervin Jones is a prominent figure in Texas politics and a candidate for the Texas House of Representatives. His political career has been marked by his advocacy for Radical causes.

Jones’ connection to the Biden administration adds another layer of complexity to the scandal.

As a former appointee in the Department of Energy, his actions not only reflect poorly on his character but also on the administration that appointed him.

The American people have reacted strongly to the revelation, condemning Jones’ actions as a desperate and deceitful attempt to manipulate voters.

Prominent voices have highlighted this incident as a prime example of the left’s willingness to fabricate stories for political gain.

“The actions of Shervin Jones are disgraceful and highlight the depths to which some Democrats will sink to gain political power,” said Texas GOP Chairman Matt Rinaldi. “This kind of deceitful behavior undermines the real instances of racism and discredits those who genuinely suffer from discrimination.”

Many commentators have also pointed out the irony of a candidate who professes to fight against hate and discrimination resorting to such tactics.

They argue that this incident further erodes trust in political figures and the media, which often fails to scrutinize such claims adequately.

This scandal has broader implications for the political landscape, particularly in how allegations of racism are treated. It raises important questions about the need for verification and skepticism when confronting claims of hate crimes and discrimination.

In an era where identity politics plays a significant role, incidents like these can have a lasting impact on public trust and the credibility of genuine victims.

In the wake of this scandal, there are growing calls for accountability. Conservative leaders are urging the Democratic Party to address this issue head-on and take appropriate action against Jones.

They argue that failure to do so would signal tacit approval of such deceitful tactics and undermine the party’s commitment to truth and integrity.

“The Democratic Party must condemn Shervin Jones’ actions unequivocally and ensure that he faces the consequences of his deceit,” said Republican strategist Karl Rove. “This kind of behavior cannot be tolerated, and it is imperative that the party demonstrates its commitment to honesty and integrity.”

As the fallout from this scandal continues, it remains to be seen how it will impact Jones’ political career and the broader discourse on racism and discrimination in America.

One thing is clear, however: the American people will not let this incident go unnoticed and will continue to hold those who engage in deceitful tactics accountable.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Left has been pushing their radical DEI agenda on the nation for a long time. But now, they seem to have met major resistance.

And Democrats suffered a massive setback after a top official got arrested.

In a dramatic turn of events, Jeremy Hobbs, a prominent LGBTQ and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) activist leader in Georgia, was arrested this week on serious charges related to drug distribution and firearms possession.

Hobbs, who has unsuccessfully run for the Columbus City Council three times, is now facing a slew of criminal charges.

The Columbus Police Department in Georgia released a statement detailing the arrest.

“On Wednesday, June 12, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., following a months-long investigation, the Columbus Police Department’s Special Operations Unit executed a search warrant at a residence in the 4200 block of 16th Avenue. Jeremy Hobbs, 49, was taken into custody without incident.”

During the search of Hobbs’ residence, law enforcement officers discovered a substantial amount of illegal drugs and a firearm.

The officers found 5.4 grams of crack cocaine, 20.7 grams of methamphetamines, 23.8 grams of liquid GHB (gamma-hydroxybutyrate), and an INA .38 revolver.

Consequently, Hobbs has been charged with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, possession of a Schedule I drug with intent to distribute, possession of drug-related objects, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime.

Hobbs has been a well-known figure in the local community, primarily through his leadership of Colgay Pride, an organization advocating for LGBTQ rights.

According to Colgay Pride’s webpage, Hobbs is described as an “organizer and political consultant.”

He served as Columbus, Georgia’s first LGBT liaison to the Columbus, Georgia Mayor’s Commission on Unity, Diversity, and Prosperity under Mayors Teresa Tomlinson and Skip Henderson from 2014 to 2019.

Colgay Pride’s Instagram page is filled with videos of Hobbs promoting various left-wing views and causes.

The organization has been active in organizing adult drag shows and LGBTQ support group events, positioning itself as a significant force in local progressive politics.

Despite his activism and attempts to gain a seat on the city council, Hobbs has been unsuccessful in his political aspirations.

His three failed bids for a council seat have not deterred him from remaining a vocal advocate for his causes. Hobbs has also worked in various capacities within the Columbus city government for over 30 years.

The charges against Hobbs have sent shockwaves through the community, particularly among his supporters and those involved in local LGBTQ and DEI initiatives.

The discovery of significant quantities of methamphetamines, crack cocaine, and GHB—often referred to as a “date rape” drug—raises serious questions about Hobbs’ activities and associations outside his public advocacy work.

The arrest of a high-profile activist like Hobbs underscores the complex and sometimes contradictory lives led by public figures.

While Hobbs has been a staunch advocate for marginalized communities, his alleged involvement in drug distribution and possession of illegal firearms presents a stark contrast to his public persona.

Critics of the left-wing activists have pointed to this incident as indicative of the hypocrisy they believe permeates certain segments of progressive advocacy.

“This arrest shows that the very people preaching about unity and diversity are sometimes the ones involved in criminal activities that tear communities apart,” said a local conservative commentator.

The arrest also raises broader concerns about the integrity of local governance and the vetting process for those seeking public office.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Joe Biden has been losing support among every key demographic including his own allies. But people were shocked when things got out of hand.

And Biden was attacked on air by this major ally he thought he could trust.

In a shocking exchange over the weekend, CNN anchor Jake Tapper expressed his concern that President Joe Biden’s unpopularity is severely impacting the Democrat ticket, based on newly released polling data.

Tapper made these remarks during an interview with Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

The discussion opened with Tapper addressing the significant challenge President Biden faces in key battleground states, where polls show him trailing former President Donald Trump.

“Let’s talk about the campaign because Trump was in battleground Michigan last night making a pitch to African-American voters,” Tapper began.

“Polls show Biden trailing Trump in key battleground states and polling well behind your Senate colleagues who are running for reelection.”

Tapper then highlighted stark contrasts from a recent New York Times poll. “Look at this New York Times poll from last month,” he continued.

“Wisconsin Senator Tammy Baldwin is up nine points in Wisconsin. Biden’s only up two points. Pennsylvania Senator Bob Casey up five in PA. Biden’s down three. Arizona Congressman Ruben Gallego, running for Senate in Arizona, up four, Biden down seven. Nevada Senator Jacky Rosen up two in Nevada. Biden’s down 12.”

Even @CNN can't spin Biden's polling nightmare:

TAPPER: "How can you look at these numbers and not conclude that Joe Biden is a drag on the ticket?!?" pic.twitter.com/v2zCc0NnrD

— Raj Aryal (@rajaryal07) June 16, 2024

Tapper’s pointed question cut to the heart of the matter: “How can you look at this, these statistics, these numbers and not conclude that Joe Biden is a drag on the ticket?”

Senator Murphy attempted to downplay the polling data, claiming that the elections would ultimately yield different results, and dismissed the New York Times/Sienna poll as just “one poll.”

Murphy’s dismissal, however, seems unconvincing given that the New York Times/Sienna poll is widely respected as one of the most accurate in the political arena.

Tapper, not satisfied with Murphy’s response, reiterated his point. “I mean, you’re happy for your colleagues, I’m sure, but Biden is underpolling all of them,” he pressed.

Murphy’s rebuttal—that there were “60 other polls that show that Joe Biden is in the lead”—fell flat, particularly as he could not name any specific polls to support his claim.

The exchange highlighted the growing anxiety within the Democratic Party about Biden’s ability to lead the ticket in 2024.

The President’s approval ratings have plummeted, fueled by widespread dissatisfaction with his handling of the economy, rising crime rates, and the ongoing border crisis.

These issues are not only eroding Biden’s support but also casting a shadow over the entire Democratic ticket.

The Biden administration has faced intense criticism for its handling of key issues. Inflation remains high, and the cost of living continues to strain American families.

Gas prices, grocery bills, and housing costs have all surged under Biden’s watch, prompting many voters to question his leadership.

Moreover, crime rates in many Democrat-run cities have skyrocketed, further eroding public confidence.

Biden’s border policies have also come under fire. The administration’s perceived leniency has led to record numbers of illegal immigrants crossing into the United States, exacerbating the border crisis.

This has not only heightened security concerns but also placed significant strain on local resources in border states.

Against this backdrop, Biden’s declining poll numbers are hardly surprising. The New York Times poll highlighted by Tapper shows Biden trailing Trump in several key states that will be crucial in the 2024 election.

The data suggests that Biden’s unpopularity could have a detrimental effect on down-ballot Democrats, making it harder for the party to retain control of Congress.

Jake Tapper’s interview with Senator Chris Murphy underscores a critical issue facing the Democratic Party: President Biden’s declining popularity is dragging down the entire ticket.

With key battleground states slipping away and voters expressing deep dissatisfaction with his leadership, the road to 2024 looks increasingly challenging for the Democrats.

As the election approaches, the party must grapple with the reality that Biden’s unpopularity could have far-reaching implications for their electoral prospects.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.