All of the mainstream media is conducting an autopsy on the Harris campaign. But one man has the answer.

And now this DNC chief exposed what caused Democrats’ historic defeat.

Philadelphia Democratic Chairman Bob Brady didn’t hold back on Wednesday, sharply criticizing the Kamala Harris campaign team for shutting out his organization and depriving Pennsylvania of critical resources, as Democrats began pointing fingers following their major election setbacks.

Brady, a former Democratic congressman, went public on several platforms, claiming Harris’s team never even bothered to engage with local leaders in this key battleground state.

“They had no respect, no coordination. I never even had a conversation with the lady. They didn’t even do the right thing as far as giving us the resources we need, and now they want to blame us?” Brady told reporters.

In an interview with NBC’s Philadelphia affiliate, he doubled down, calling the campaign “elitist.”

“They were just elitist and went out there, did their own thing, and didn’t include Democratic city committee, ward leaders, or committee people. They just didn’t do it,” Brady said, contrasting Harris’s approach with previous Democratic nominees like Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Barack Obama, who all worked closely with his organization.

“They talked to us. They asked, ‘What do we need to do?’ The Harris campaign never talked to us,” he continued.

Brady also took issue with Harris’s team allegedly shifting blame to Biden.

“I understand some in her camp were blaming Joe Biden. Can you imagine blaming Joe Biden for her loss? She lost. He didn’t lose,” he told Fox News.

The Harris campaign wasted no time firing back. In a scathing response, senior adviser Brendan McPhillips defended the team’s efforts in Pennsylvania, saying:

“The Pennsylvania for Harris team knocked more than two million doors in the weekend leading up to Election Day, which is two million more doors than Bob Brady’s organization can claim to have knocked during his entire tenure as party chairman.”

McPhillips further called out Brady’s fundraising tactics:

“If there’s any immediate takeaway from Philadelphia’s turnout this cycle, it’s that Chairman Brady’s decades-long practice of fleecing campaigns for money to make up for his own lack of fundraising ability or leadership is a worthless endeavor that no future campaign should ever be forced to entertain again.”

Despite winning Philadelphia, Harris’s numbers lagged behind Biden’s 2020 totals, with the vice president securing only 547,729 votes as of Wednesday evening.

Philadelphia’s voter turnout hovered around 63%, a dip from 2020, though the number could inch up as final votes are tallied.

Ultimately, Donald Trump’s win in Pennsylvania added the crucial 19 electoral votes he needed for victory.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Democrats are completely humiliated. The country has handed them a devastating rebuke.

And now Nancy Pelosi ran scared after being asked the one question she never wants to answer.

A somber-looking Nancy Pelosi sidestepped questions from The New York Post on Wednesday about her role in the decision to replace President Biden with Vice President Kamala Harris as the 2024 Democratic nominee.

The former House Speaker had a tense exchange with ex-Democratic National Committee Chair Donna Brazile before Harris’s concession speech at Howard University.

“Do you think it was a mistake to kick Joe Biden off the ballot?” a reporter from The Post asked as Pelosi, 84, exited the event. The longtime congresswoman, fresh off her 20th election win in her San Francisco district, stayed silent, also dodging questions about her own political future in 2026.

Current DNC Chair Jaime Harrison and former DNC head Tom Perez likewise remained tight-lipped when asked for comment. Before Harris took the stage, Pelosi was seen on camera in an animated discussion with Brazile, with DC Mayor Muriel Bowser trying to diffuse the situation, visibly gesturing and saying, “Come on… please.”

In response to rumors of a disagreement, Brazile later posted on X, calling it “stupidity” and clarifying that she and Pelosi were discussing remaining House races. “Folks, this is the Trump era: lies, disinformation, and gossip. What happened to the USA?” she posted.

Pelosi’s husband Paul and daughter Christine, a Democratic strategist, were also in attendance at Howard.

Shortly after the footage of Pelosi and Brazile circulated, Christine shared a video on X where she expressed appreciation for Harris’s campaign, saying, “Thank you, Kamala,” as she posed with Brazile.

Renowned London-based forensic lip reader Jeremy Freeman, who reviewed the exchange, confirmed Bowser’s calming words amid Pelosi’s intense gestures.

Prior to Election Day, Pelosi exuded confidence in Harris’s chances. “Elections are decisions,” she told The Guardian. “I decided a while ago that Donald Trump will never set foot in the White House again.”

When asked if her decision to support Harris over Biden was tactical, Pelosi explained, “When you make a decision, you have to make every decision in favor of winning … and the most important decision of all is the candidate.”

Harris ultimately lost to Trump in an Electoral College landslide, with news networks calling the race early Wednesday morning.

Reflecting on the loss, a Biden ally shared with Jewish Insider editor Josh Kraushaar that “Democratic infighting” and Obama-era advisers’ reluctance to back Harris had played a significant role in the defeat.

Biden stepped aside for Harris only after pressure from Pelosi, congressional Democrats, and influential donors, including Hollywood’s George Clooney.

Biden even named Pelosi’s comments as one reason he stepped down, noting in an August interview, “A number of my Democratic colleagues in the House and Senate thought that I was going to hurt them in the races.”

He added, “I thought it’d be a real distraction.”

Pelosi, in turn, admitted in mid-October that she hadn’t spoken with Biden since his withdrawal.

Reports indicated Pelosi had even threatened to release internal polling showing Biden’s weak path to victory following his troubled June 27 debate against Trump, where Biden’s halting responses allowed Trump to throw shade with remarks like, “And I don’t think he knows what he said, either.”

Like Hillary Clinton in 2016, Harris postponed her concession speech until Wednesday afternoon, almost a full day after polls closed.

Addressing a crowd of hundreds at Howard, she declared, “While I concede this election, I do not concede the fight that fueled this campaign.” Many in the audience had been hopeful of witnessing her become the first female president.

In a Wednesday statement on X, Biden expressed no regrets about choosing Harris as his 2020 running mate, saying, “As I’ve said before, selecting Kamala was the very first decision I made when I became the nominee for president in 2020. It was the best decision I made.”

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The rift between Biden and Kamala is well known. What else would you expect after pushing him out of the race.

But now Joe Biden humiliated Kamala in prime time post-election speech.

In his first public address since Vice President Kamala Harris’s sweeping election loss, President Biden appeared upbeat, greeting staff with a grin and sharing the message that “setbacks are unavoidable.”

Biden, 81, reflected on his own legacy, blowing a kiss to his outgoing team on Thursday morning but steering clear of any direct mention of Harris, 60, who fell short against President-elect Donald Trump after Biden was urged by fellow Democratic leaders to step down over concerns about his mental fitness.

He called for unity across the nation—despite his recent harsh words labeling Trump supporters “garbage.”

“Setbacks are unavoidable, but giving up is unforgivable. We all get knocked down, but the measure of our character, as my dad would say, is how quickly we get back up,” Biden stated in a 7-minute Rose Garden address.

“Remember, a defeat does not mean we are defeated. We lost this battle. The America of your dreams is calling on you to get back up.”

Biden took the opportunity to highlight his own legacy, particularly the long-term impacts of his administration’s infrastructure and environmental investments, which he noted may not be fully realized until a decade from now.

“You can’t love your country only when you win. You can’t love your neighbor only when you agree,” he said, despite his recent contentious remarks about Trump supporters.

“I hope we can see each other not as adversaries but as fellow Americans and bring down the temperature,” Biden added.

“We accept the choice the country made.”

Turning to Harris, Biden praised her campaign, calling it “inspiring” and commending her “whole heart and effort.”

“She and her entire campaign should be proud of the campaign that she ran,” he remarked.

Biden was compelled to relinquish the Democratic nomination in late July, giving Harris just 107 days to campaign—a race that initially showed promise but ultimately faltered across the board in the critical swing states.

After a disastrous June 27 debate with Trump, Biden clung to his position, resisting pressure to step aside.

However, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, former President Barack Obama, and their allies eventually succeeded in convincing him to step down.

You can tell, despite his words, he is relishing in her loss.

And who can blame him?

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Trump’s victory will have ripple effects for years. And one of the biggest ones will come from a former opponent.

And RFK Jr. revealed what he’ll do on day one in the Trump administration.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently suggested that a second Trump administration could overhaul parts of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to root out what he describes as “corruption.”

In an interview with MSNBC on Wednesday following President-elect Donald Trump’s 2024 election victory, Kennedy, now a significant Trump ally after endorsing him, was asked about his potential role in the new administration and whether he’d consider “clearing out the top level federal service workers that are currently at the FDA and the CDC.”

“In some categories, I would say,” Kennedy replied.

Kennedy singled out specific departments within the FDA, particularly the nutrition division, which he believes is failing the public.

“In some categories, their entire departments, like the nutrition department in the FDA, they have to go. They’re not doing their job. They’re not protecting our kids. Why do we have Froot Loops in this country that have 18 or 19 ingredients, and you go to Canada, and it’s got two or three?”

On the question of dismantling entire agencies like the FDA, Kennedy was more cautious.

“To eliminate the agencies, as long as it requires congressional approval, I wouldn’t be doing that,” he stated, adding:

“But I can get the corruption out of the agencies. This is what I’ve been doing for 40 years. I’ve sued all those agencies. I have a Ph.D. in corporate corruption and that’s what I do. Once they’re not corrupt, once Americans are getting good science and are allowed to make their own choices, they’re going to get a lot healthier.”

Kennedy later shared the interview on X, reiterating his pledge to “clean up the corruption” in health agencies like the FDA.

“President Trump has asked me to do three things: 1. Clean up the corruption in our government health agencies. 2. Return those agencies to their rich tradition of gold-standard, evidence-based science. 3. Make America Healthy Again by ending the chronic disease epidemic,” he wrote.

President Trump has asked me to do three things:
1. Clean up the corruption in our government health agencies.
2. Return those agencies to their rich tradition of gold-standard, evidence-based science.
3. Make America Healthy Again by ending the chronic disease epidemic. pic.twitter.com/WHMOsD0CiI

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) November 6, 2024

Initially, Kennedy ran as an independent candidate but ultimately suspended his campaign in August, throwing his support behind Trump.

Since then, he’s been a vocal advocate for Trump and has hinted at a potential White House role.

Just days before the election, Kennedy also floated another health-related policy idea, suggesting that Trump would remove fluoride from drinking water.

“On January 20, the Trump White House will advise all U.S. water systems to remove fluoride from public water,” Kennedy posted on X.

He described fluoride as “an industrial waste associated with arthritis, bone fractures, bone cancer, IQ loss, neurodevelopmental disorders, and thyroid disease,” adding that former President Trump and first lady Melania Trump “want to Make America Healthy Again.”

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Left is starting to eat their own. They have no one to blame but themselves.

And now CBS slammed Democrats in an epic backstab that no one saw coming.

Veteran CBS News reporter Jan Crawford recently criticized The New York Times for a headline she argued shows the paper’s disconnect from everyday Americans in the wake of President-elect Trump’s sweeping victory.

Taking to X, Crawford shared a screenshot of the Times’ headline, which proclaimed “TRUMP’S AMERICA” and “VICTORY CHANGES NATION’S SENSE OF ITSELF,” alongside the Electoral College tally showing Trump at 295 to Vice President Kamala Harris’s 226.

Crawford’s sharp response? “Ummm. Isn’t the headline here ‘Victory Reveals NYT Doesn’t Understand Nation.'”

The Times has yet to respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

This isn’t the first time Crawford, CBS’s seasoned legal correspondent, has challenged the prevailing media narrative. Recently, she stood up for “CBS Mornings” co-host Tony Dokoupil, who came under fire internally for pressing anti-Israel author Ta-Nehisi Coates during a broadcast.

On a CBS network call, Crawford defended Dokoupil’s rigorous questioning, stating, “It sounds like we are calling out one of our anchors in a somewhat public setting on this call for failing to meet editorial standards for, I’m not even sure what.”

Crawford went on to emphasize CBS’s commitment to truth and balanced journalism:

“When someone comes on our air with a one-sided account of a very complex situation, as Coates himself acknowledges that he has, it’s my understanding that as journalists we are obligated to challenge that worldview…so that our viewers can have that access to the truth or a fuller account, a more balanced account. To me, that is what Tony did.”

Meanwhile, The New York Times has doubled down on its anti-Trump stance following his resounding win on Tuesday night.

The paper has continued pushing a “fascism” narrative despite the media’s clear disconnect from voters.

The Times ran a headline reading, “America Hires a Strongman,” describing the outcome in almost apocalyptic terms.

“This was a conquering of the nation not by force but with a permission slip. Now, America stands on the precipice of an authoritarian style of governance never before seen in its 248-year history,” the Times wrote.

Still reeling from Harris’s loss, the paper has called Trump’s election a “perilous choice.”

The editorial board didn’t hold back, warning Americans to “be cleareyed about the threat to the nation and its laws that will come from its 47th president” and urging the public to “exercise their rights in defense of the country and the people, laws, institutions and values that have kept it strong.”

In a parting shot, the board declared, “Mr. Trump’s election poses a grave threat to [the] republic, but he will not determine the long-term fate of American democracy.

That outcome remains in the hands of the American people.”

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

America’s number one enemy has to be China. And they want us to know it.

Because they have one stunning message for America after Trump’s landslide victory.

China’s official reaction to President-elect Trump’s victory was predictably measured.

“Our policy towards the U.S. is consistent,” foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning told reporters Wednesday afternoon. “We will continue to view and handle China-U.S. relations in accordance with the principles of mutual respect, peaceful co-existence and win-win cooperation.”

Professor Yuan Juzheng of National Taiwan University, fresh from a trip to China, observed that nearly everyone he encountered wanted to discuss the U.S. election.

He told Fox News Digital that a Trump win is seen as a “worst-case scenario” in Beijing. Both Chinese experts and citizens believe that under Trump, already tense U.S.-China relations are likely to deteriorate.

Throughout the campaign, Trump emphasized a tough stance on trade, openly advocating for tariffs on Chinese goods.

Professor Yuan noted that China wasn’t “prepared psychologically” for Trump’s initial trade policies around 2018, which included tariffs targeting companies like Huawei. This time, however, China is well aware of the potential impact—especially as its economy faces challenges.

“Three key issues will continue to dominate the U.S.-China relationship. They are the three T’s — trade, technology and Taiwan,” said Zhiqun Zhu, a political science and international relations professor at Bucknell University, just before Trump’s official victory announcement.

In Taiwan, President William Lai congratulated Trump on X, writing, “Sincere congratulations to President-elect @realDonaldTrump on your victory. I’m confident that the longstanding # Taiwan – #US partnership, built on shared values & interests, will continue to serve as a cornerstone for regional stability & lead to greater prosperity for us all.”

Taiwan’s Vice President Bi-khim Hsiao also took to X to extend her congratulations, expressing hopes for a strong Taiwan-U.S. alliance “for freedom, peace, and economic prosperity.”

Reactions among Taiwanese citizens were mixed. Many dislike Trump’s blunt style, and a recent poll showed over half preferred Harris. Still, a significant portion believes Trump’s hardline approach toward China could be “better for Taiwan”—an expectation shared by some in mainland China.

Ross Darrell Feingold, a Taipei-based attorney and commentator, is active on TouTiao, a Chinese platform with over 150 million daily users. On the Sunday before the U.S. election, Feingold posted a carefully worded question, asking, “As a Chinese person, do you think Trump or Kamala Harris will be more harmful to China-U.S. relations?”

The question attracted over 30,000 views and some 5,500 responses. While some supported Harris, many saw the U.S. as hostile to China’s rise, regardless of who is in office.

Feingold observed, “Based on the comments I received on TouTiao, the public in China seems to think the U.S. — led by a leader from either party — would seek to restrain China’s growth.”

Professor Zhu from Bucknell highlighted a shift in sentiment, noting that, “While over 80% of Americans surveyed view China negatively now, the positive Chinese views of America have also dropped … many Chinese, including liberals in China, have become more critical of the United States … and believe the U.S. is not welcoming Chinese students, tourists and businesspeople.”

Japan also extended congratulations to Trump. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, quoted in Barron’s, expressed hope that the U.S.-Japan alliance would “move to new heights” under Trump’s leadership.

On X, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol also offered his congratulations, writing, “Under your strong leadership, the future of the ROK [Republic of Korea]-U.S. alliance and America will shine brighter. Look forward to working closely with you.”

While some speculated North Korean leader Kim Jong Un would welcome Trump’s return, there was no official comment from North Korea.

However, the nation fired multiple short-range ballistic missiles just hours before the U.S. election on Tuesday, underscoring the persistent tensions in the region.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.