Home Blog Page 32

Top US official sounds the alarm on a stunning foreign threat

Prudent Politics
-
0
Top US official sounds the alarm on a stunning foreign threat

Joe Biden’s foreign policies are an absolute disaster. But no one thought things would ever get this bad.

Now, a top US official sounded the alarm on a stunning foreign threat.

Former U.S. official Dan Senor, in a recent interview, expressed his strong belief that the Hamas terrorist organization is not genuinely interested in negotiating a ceasefire agreement with Israel.

Instead, Senor argued, Hamas is intent on prolonging the conflict for as long as possible. His remarks came during an interview with Margaret Hoover on PBS’s “Firing Line,” where the discussion focused on Israel and U.S. foreign policy.

Senor, who served as a senior advisor and chief spokesman for the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, reflected on the immediate aftermath of the October 7 attacks carried out by Hamas.

He admitted to having naively believed that the barbaric nature of these attacks would galvanize international support for Israel.

“I did not think within a matter of days the outrage of the world would be directed at Jews for objecting to being massacred,” Senor said, expressing his disillusionment with the global reaction.

The conversation took a deeper turn as Senor addressed the broader issue of anti-Semitism.

He defined it succinctly, stating, “At the end of the day, if I had to boil it down, it is holding the Jewish people to a standard that you hold nobody else. That is anti-Semitism. That is discrimination.” Senor emphasized that questioning the legitimacy of the Jewish state, the sole Jewish state in the world, is a clear form of anti-Semitism.

“Against that backdrop, in a sense, it’s not surprising that everything the Jewish state does is wrong, if that’s your frame. And when you say, ‘everyone else can do X, Y, and Z, but the Jewish state can’t,’ that is a form of discrimination and that is anti-Semitism. And that is what we’re watching now.”

Senor highlighted the unique scrutiny Israel faces, noting, “Israel is being held to a standard that no other country or no other people in the world have ever been held to. This is the most scrutinized war that I have ever seen.”

His comments reflect a deep frustration with the international community’s apparent double standards when it comes to Israel’s right to defend itself against terrorist threats.

Turning to the issue of a potential ceasefire, Senor dismissed the notion that Hamas is genuinely interested in peace negotiations.

“I do not believe Hamas is serious about a real negotiation,” he stated unequivocally. According to Senor, Hamas believes it is in a winning position and has no incentive to negotiate a ceasefire that would essentially spell its end.

“The reason they think they are winning is because over the last few months pressure has been mounting on Israel, not on Hamas,” Senor explained.

He elaborated further, saying, “The idea that Hamas would negotiate a ceasefire that negotiates them out of existence is preposterous. They’re not going to do that, especially if they think time is on their side. A deal that ensures that they aren’t around anymore is a loss that I don’t think they’re going to sign up for.”

This assessment underscores Senor’s belief that Hamas is playing a long game, using the conflict to bolster its standing and influence while painting Israel as the aggressor.

Senor’s comments come at a time when the Biden administration’s foreign policy approach toward the Middle East is under intense scrutiny.

Many people argue that the administration’s policies have emboldened terrorist organizations like Hamas by signaling a lack of unequivocal support for Israel.

The international community’s mixed reactions to Israel’s defensive measures have also contributed to this complex and volatile situation.

Dan Senor’s interview on PBS’s “Firing Line” sheds light on the enduring complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the challenges faced by Israel in securing its right to exist amid relentless attacks from terrorist organizations like Hamas.

His remarks underscore a broader concern among conservatives about the international community’s failure to hold Hamas accountable and the potential consequences of perceived double standards in the treatment of Israel.

As the situation continues to evolve, the call for a more balanced and principled approach to Middle Eastern policy remains a critical issue for policymakers and the global community.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Key figure uncovers terrifying Leftist attack at the polls

Prudent Politics
-
0
Key figure uncovers terrifying Leftist attack at the polls

Many Americans have been concerned regarding election integrity in recent years. And now, it seems their fears are coming true.

Because a key figure has uncovered a terrifying Leftist plot at the polls.

In a fiery speech at Turning Point Action’s “The People’s Convention” in Detroit, Steve Bannon, former White House chief strategist under President Donald Trump, issued a stark warning about a left-wing conspiracy to imprison Trump in an effort to sway the upcoming 2024 presidential election.

Addressing a crowd of enthusiastic supporters, Bannon painted a grim picture of the political landscape and vowed that conservatives would fight back with vigor.

Bannon began his speech by highlighting the critical date of July 11, suggesting that it will mark a significant turn in the Democrats’ strategy to imprison Trump.

“You know on the 11th of July, they’re gonna sentence him for multiple years in prison. You understand that, right?” Bannon asked the audience, emphasizing the gravity of the situation.

He continued, “They don’t care about this election; they don’t care how many votes we get. They’re gonna fight us every step of the way.” Bannon’s assertion underscores a deep-seated belief among many of Trump’s supporters that the former president is being unfairly targeted by a politicized justice system.

The event, organized by Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point Action, served as a rallying point for prominent conservative voices.

It is being held just one month before the Republican National Convention in Wisconsin, further intensifying the focus on the 2024 election.

Bannon’s rhetoric did not stop at predicting Trump’s imprisonment; he also sounded the alarm about potential efforts to delegitimize the election results.

“Winning in November is just the first step. From November fifth to the sixth, Jamie Raskin is going to try to steal the election on January 6th,” Bannon claimed. He accused Democrats of planning to disqualify Trump from certification based on allegations of insurrection. “They’re already talking about it right now. They’re already going to say, ‘President Trump’s an insurrectionist and we will never certify an election of an insurrectionist,’” Bannon said.

Bannon’s speech also included a vow for retribution against those he believes are weaponizing the Department of Justice against Trump.

“We’re going to get every single receipt. And to the fullest extension of the law, you’re going to be investigated, prosecuted, and incarcerated,” Bannon declared, directing his ire at government officials and left-wing individuals he claims have unjustly targeted the former president. He clarified that his call for action was not about revenge but about ensuring justice. “This has nothing to do with retribution. It has nothing to do with revenge… this has to do with justice,” Bannon explained, eliciting loud applause and cheers from the crowd.

The atmosphere at the convention was charged with a sense of urgency and determination.

Many attendees echoed Bannon’s sentiments, expressing frustration with a corrupt and biased legal system.

As the Republican National Convention approaches, the stakes could not be higher.

The party is gearing up for what promises to be one of the most contentious and closely watched elections in recent history.

Bannon’s speech at the Turning Point Action event is a clear indication that Trump’s allies are ready to mobilize and fight back against any attempts to derail his campaign.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Hunter’s baby mama speaks out and destroys Democrats’ false narrative

Prudent Politics
-
0
Hunter’s baby mama speaks out and destroys Democrats’ false narrative

The media and Radical Left have been working together to paint a picture of a clean and put-together Biden family. However, recent reports are totally different.

And Hunter’s baby mama has spoken out and destroyed the Democrat’s false narrative.

Lunden Roberts, the mother of Hunter Biden’s estranged daughter, has disclosed a series of shocking behaviors she witnessed during her time within his inner circle.

Among the revelations, Roberts claims that Hunter Biden nearly died from a drug overdose and kept drug paraphernalia “locked up” in President Biden’s Virginia home.

She also alleges that Hunter often slept with her friends, including almost immediately after she informed him of her pregnancy with their child.

Roberts’ memoir, “Out of the Shadows: My Life Inside the Wild World of Hunter Biden,” is being published by Skyhorse, co-managed by Tony Lyons, the co-founder of American Values 2024, a super PAC supporting independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The memoir is set to hit shelves later this summer.

According to a review by the New York Post, Roberts was exposed to Hunter Biden’s drug problems from the moment they met in 2017 at a party hosted by his investment firm, Rosemont Seneca, in Washington, DC.

She first saw him shortly after arriving with a friend who had invited her. Hunter was by himself in an office wearing only boxers “with parrots all over them,” organizing his drug paraphernalia, which included glass tubes and copper wire.

When their eyes met, Roberts noted that his eyes were “the most beautiful” she’d ever seen, and she was immediately drawn to his “complex” nature.

Their relationship quickly turned intimate, despite Hunter’s ongoing relationship with his late brother’s widow and his recent separation from his first wife, Kathleen Buhle.

Roberts introduced Hunter to a group of her friends she called the “Amoeba,” with whom he also engaged in sexual relations, often at upscale hotels.

Throughout their year-long association, Roberts witnessed numerous troubling behaviors.

She described instances where Hunter twerked on a stripper pole, continually purchased and used drugs, and acted erratically.

One particularly harrowing episode occurred during a drug binge when Hunter appeared at a hotel where Roberts and her friends were staying and collapsed in front of them.

Roberts stayed with him throughout the night to ensure his safety but refrained from calling for help to avoid causing a public scene that could negatively impact Hunter and his family.

In 2018, Roberts became pregnant. Although Hunter initially appeared supportive, he later denied having had a relationship with her.

Hunter has previously claimed that they met only once at a strip club and did not have sex. However, a paternity test later confirmed he was the father of Roberts’ daughter, Navy.

Roberts’ memoir also details how Hunter kept a stash of drug paraphernalia “locked up” in President Biden’s Virginia home, suggesting that his struggles with addiction were well-known within the Biden family.

Despite the Biden family’s public image, these revelations paint a starkly different picture of the private turmoil they have endured.

According to Roberts, Hunter has recently begun speaking with his daughter Navy via Zoom, although neither he nor other members of the Biden family have met her in person.

This ongoing estrangement highlights the complicated dynamics within the Biden family, particularly regarding Hunter’s troubled past and its impact on his relationships.

The publication of Roberts’ memoir comes at a politically sensitive time, as President Biden faces declining approval ratings and increasing scrutiny over his family’s conduct.

These revelations are likely to fuel further controversy and raise questions about the president’s awareness of and response to his son’s behavior.

Many Americans have also pointed to the mainstream media’s reluctance to cover these stories in-depth, suggesting a bias that shields the Biden family from the level of scrutiny applied to their political opponents.

They argue that if similar allegations were made against a member of the Trump family, the media response would be far more aggressive and relentless.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this story and more.

Joe Biden’s shocking betrayal of U.S. troops has left America horrified

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Joe Biden’s shocking betrayal of U.S. troops has left America horrified

Biden seems to hate our troops. And he is always doing things that harm them.

But now, Joe Biden’s shocking betrayal of U.S. troops has left America horrified.

After President Joe Biden opposed the House-led version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which proposed a 19.5% raise in basic pay for low-ranking troops, House Republicans unleashed a wave of criticism.

The proposed legislation aimed to increase the annual income of early-career enlisted service members to at least $30,000, up from the current minimum of $24,000, excluding housing allowances and free healthcare.

The White House issued a statement expressing strong opposition to the proposed pay raise, stating that Biden “strongly opposes making a significant, permanent change to the basic pay schedule before the completion of the Fourteenth Quadrennial Review of Military Compensation (QRMC).”

This stance was met with fierce disapproval from Republican lawmakers, who highlighted the financial struggles faced by many service members.

Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-WI), a former Navy SEAL, expressed his outrage to the Daily Mail, emphasizing the financial hardships experienced by junior enlisted personnel.

“Joe Biden managed to become a multi-millionaire on a public servant salary,” Van Orden stated. “And he is snatching food out of our junior enlisted people’s mouths.”

He recalled his own experience, noting that his family had to rely on WIC coupons to feed their children during his service. “It’s disgusting and reprehensible. I can’t feel more strongly about it. That is bulls***,” he added, condemning the White House’s attitude.

Rep. Mike Garcia (R-CA) echoed Van Orden’s sentiments, calling Biden’s opposition “completely insane.” Garcia questioned the rationale behind the administration’s stance, arguing that the decision was both illogical and politically damaging.

“I can’t understand the rationale and in what universe it would make sense, either from a policy or from a political perspective. They’re actually going out of their way to say no to this and explain why this is a bad idea and it’s, it’s completely irrational and politically it’s actually suicidal,” Garcia said.

Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE) also criticized Biden’s position, labeling it “one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard come out of [Biden’s] mouth.”

Bacon highlighted the struggles of military personnel, particularly in expensive areas like Washington D.C. and San Diego, who rely on food banks.

“You got one out of eight ballistic guys on staff at food and water food banks, particularly in D.C., San Diego. And we figured we worked hard to figure out what the price need to be to get them above that threshold,” he explained.

Former President Donald Trump reportedly discussed the issue with House Republicans, emphasizing the importance of military pay.

According to Garcia, Trump made military pay a “front burner issue,” stating, “Everyone knows that we’re having challenges in our military right now. So why would you not support getting them to the equivalent of a minimum wage which the rest of the universe has in our country?”

Garcia underscored the dire financial situation faced by many service members, noting, “This is a pay raise targeted at the E1 through E4 level, who are currently making literally $12 an hour, right now, which in California is about half of what the fast food workers make at McDonald’s.”

In stark contrast, the White House statement prioritized diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives over the proposed pay raise.

“The Administration strongly opposes Sections 573 and 1113(g)(3), which would limit the ability of DoD and Federal agencies to support and promote positive cultures that empower, respect, and value all employees and students. The prohibitions regarding DEI efforts would impede DoD’s and Federal agencies’ ability to recruit and retain the diverse perspectives, experiences, and skillsets that are foundational to the strength of the Federal workforce,” the statement read.

House Republicans have lambasted the administration’s focus on DEI over addressing the immediate financial needs of service members.

The decision to prioritize DEI efforts while opposing a pay raise for junior enlisted personnel has fueled Republican claims that the administration is out of touch with the realities faced by many Americans, particularly those in the military.

As the economic challenges faced by service members come to the forefront, the issue is likely to remain a contentious point in the ongoing discussions about military funding and support.

The strong opposition from House Republicans signals a continued push to prioritize the financial well-being of service members, even as the administration focuses on broader social and cultural initiatives.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

House GOP leaders win massive victory and expose top Democrats’ election scheme

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
House GOP leaders win massive victory and expose top Democrats’ election scheme

The radical Left continues to point fingers at conservatives for voting anomalies. But new evidence proves the exact opposite.

And House GOP leaders have won a massive victory and exposed top Democrats’ election scheme.

In a bold move, 15 Biden Cabinet officials have been issued subpoenas by the House GOP, demanding documents related to a suspected voter mobilization “scheme” linked to an executive order from the Biden White House in 2021.

The subpoenas, spearheaded by Rep. Bryan Steil (R-WI), Chairman of the Committee on House Administration, highlight growing concerns about the administration’s potential overreach and partisan manipulation of federal resources.

The executive order in question, titled “Promoting Access to Voting,” was issued with the intent to bolster voter participation and ensure equal access to voting across various jurisdictions.

According to the order, “Executive departments and agencies should partner with State, local, Tribal, and territorial election officials to protect and promote the exercise of the right to vote, eliminate discrimination and other barriers to voting, and expand access to voter registration and accurate election information.”

Despite these ostensibly noble goals, Senate Republicans have raised alarms about the order, labeling it as a federal “voter mobilization” effort with “potentially partisan impacts.”

The order’s implementation has drawn scrutiny, particularly regarding its alignment with the provisions of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) of 1993.

In his subpoena letter, Steil articulated these concerns, emphasizing the potential misuse of federal resources for partisan gains. “The Committee has concerns about the implementation of E.O. 14019, particularly regarding its compatibility with provisions of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) of 1993,” Steil wrote.

He further criticized the use of federal funds and resources by agencies like the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to promote voter registration, stating, “Congress delegates to federal agencies specific functions and missions, which by law they are required to follow. Congress’s delegation of authority to HUD does not include using funds and resources to provide Americans with voter registration materials.”

The executive order mandates that every federal agency submit a strategic plan outlining how it can promote voter registration and participation.

Steil pointed out specific actions taken by federal agencies that he believes were likely part of these strategic plans.

For instance, the Department of Education’s new federal work-study requirements and the Small Business Administration’s voter registration agreement with Michigan have both been cited as examples of potentially partisan activities.

“Both of those actions and the actions of other agencies raise substantial questions and concerns, some of which may be answered by access to the strategic plans drafted by the agencies,” Steil added.

The House committee is now considering legislation to repeal the executive order, underscoring the gravity of the issue.

The subpoena list includes a wide array of federal departments: Commerce, Defense, Homeland Security, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Justice, Interior, Labor, Office of Management and Budget, Housing and Urban Development, State, Transportation, Treasury, and Agriculture.

In a statement to Fox News, Steil did not mince words. “This executive order is another attempt by the Biden administration to tilt the scales ahead of 2024. I will continue working to provide transparency and accountability on this administration’s latest scheme as Congress did not appropriate taxpayer funds for partisan activities,” he said.

Steil characterized the order as a “scheme” designed to execute “partisan activities” without congressional approval. He stressed the importance of non-partisan election administration, stating, “Elections are partisan, but our election administration should never be partisan. Allowing federal employees from the Biden administration to flood election administration sites threatens election integrity and reduces Americans’ confidence.”

The GOP’s move to subpoena these documents signals a significant escalation in their efforts to hold the Biden administration accountable.

The implications of this investigation could be far-reaching, potentially uncovering misuse of federal resources and partisan meddling in the electoral process.

As the 2024 election looms, the House GOP’s actions highlight the ongoing battle over election integrity and the role of federal agencies in safeguarding — or undermining — democratic processes.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

New proof of Biden tampering with major evidence could completely change his case

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
New proof of Biden tampering with major evidence could completely change his case

The Biden family is willing to do whatever it takes to cover up their corruption. But everyone was shocked when they heard this news.

Because new proof of Biden tampering with major evidence could completely change his case.

In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that Joe Biden’s ghostwriter, Mike Zwonitzer, admitted to deleting audio recordings from interviews with the president.

This action was taken at least partially due to Special Counsel Robert Hur’s investigation into whether Biden mishandled classified documents after his tenure in the Obama administration.

The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project released a transcript on Thursday morning detailing Zwonitzer’s interview with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) last year.

During the interview, Zwonitzer acknowledged that his decision to delete the recordings was influenced by the ongoing investigation, although he claimed that deleting audio files was a routine practice for him.

“The outside observer is going to look at this and say, Mark Zwonitzer, President Biden’s friend, ghostwriter, collaborator learned of the special counsel’s investigation, saw this was happening and then deleted all these audio recordings,” the FBI agent said.

“I just need the truth on this one … That was part of your motivation, at least something you were aware of when you did this?”

“I’m not going to say how much of the percentage it was of my motivation,” Zwonitzer replied.

He admitted he was aware of the investigation and expressed concern about the possibility of being hacked. He worried that the audio could be spread across the internet, particularly due to the “personal stuff and emotional stuff about Beau,” Biden’s late son.

Zwonitzer said that out of an abundance of caution, he “took the audio files subfolder from both the G drive and [his] laptop, and slid them into the trash.”

Zwonitzer further claimed that deleting audio files was a standard practice for him, not just in Biden’s case.

“I generally save transcripts but I haven’t over the years ever saved audios,” he stated.

However, his admission that he deleted the files after becoming aware of the investigation raises significant concerns about the motivations behind his actions.

It has been alleged that Biden may have shared the contents of some classified documents with Zwonitzer during their interviews, potentially breaching national security.

In March, Special Counsel Robert Hur testified that Zwonitzer “tried to destroy the evidence,” adding weight to the allegations against Biden.

This revelation comes at a time when President Biden is already facing mounting criticism over his handling of classified documents and his administration’s transparency.

The fact that his ghostwriter felt compelled to delete audio recordings in light of an investigation only adds to the perception of impropriety and potential cover-up.

Republican lawmakers have seized upon this development, calling for further scrutiny and accountability.

Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH), a vocal critic of the Biden administration, stated, “This is a clear example of the lengths to which the Biden administration and its allies will go to protect themselves from scrutiny. The American people deserve to know the truth about what is in those classified documents and why they were mishandled.”

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) echoed Jordan’s sentiments, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability.

“The deletion of these audio recordings raises serious questions about what the Biden administration is trying to hide. We need a thorough investigation to get to the bottom of this,” Cruz said.

The controversy surrounding Biden’s handling of classified documents and the subsequent deletion of audio recordings by his ghostwriter further undermines the credibility of his administration.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story and more.

U.S. Congresswoman gets attacked by the mob in shocking turn of events

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
U.S. Congresswoman gets attacked by the mob in shocking turn of events

The political polarization in this country has reached a fever pitch. Now no one is safe.

But now, a U.S. Congresswoman got attacked by the mob in a shocking turn of events.

Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) posted a strong condemnation on X against an antisemitic rally organized by the extremist pro-Palestinian group Within Our Lifetime (WOL).

The rally, titled “A Day of Rage for Gaza,” took place in New York City over the weekend, beginning at Union Square and ending at Wall Street, where an exhibit on the Nova Festival massacre — the brutal October 7 attack by Hamas terrorists that claimed the lives of hundreds of innocent Israeli civilians at a music festival — has been displayed since April.

The protest quickly turned unruly, with participants openly supporting terrorism and displaying blatantly antisemitic messages such as “long live October 7” and “the Zionists are not Jews and not humans.”

Some protesters were seen brandishing flags of Hamas’ armed al-Qassam Brigades, a recognized terrorist organization, while others defiantly waved the flags of the Lebanese terrorist group Hezbollah.

The incendiary rally underscored the deep-seated hatred and violent extremism that permeates certain segments of the pro-Palestinian movement.

In her post on X, Ocasio-Cortez stated, “The callousness, dehumanization, and targeting of Jews on display at last night’s protest outside the Nova Festival exhibit was atrocious antisemitism – plain and simple. Antisemitism has no place in our city nor any broader movement that centers human dignity and liberation.”

However, Ocasio-Cortez’s condemnation was met with fierce criticism from within the very movement she was attempting to address.

Nerdeen Kiswani, an organizer for WOL, fired back at the congresswoman, accusing her of being a “genocide apologist” and revealing that Ocasio-Cortez had previously sought to partner with their organization.

“You are a genocide apologist,” Kiswani responded. “This is why when your staff asked WOLPalestine if you can speak at our Queens rally in 2021 we said NO. What’s callous is the Zionist exhibit used to manufacture consent for genocide, but you don’t care since you didn’t vote against funding it.”

This revelation underscores a troubling inconsistency in Ocasio-Cortez’s public stance on issues related to Israel and Palestine.

While she now seeks to condemn antisemitism and distance herself from extremist elements, her previous attempts to align with a group that openly supports terrorism and spreads antisemitic propaganda raises serious questions about her judgment and true intentions.

The incident also highlights a broader issue within the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, where support for Palestinian causes often veers dangerously close to endorsing or excusing outright antisemitism and terrorism.

The fact that a sitting U.S. congresswoman would even consider partnering with a group like WOL speaks volumes about the radical elements that have infiltrated mainstream political discourse.

The backlash from WOL also reveals the deep divisions within the pro-Palestinian movement itself.

While some activists attempt to frame their cause in terms of human rights and liberation, others, like Kiswani, do not shy away from expressing their outright hatred and violent intentions towards Jews and the state of Israel.

In light of these events, it is imperative for political leaders to take a clear and unequivocal stand against antisemitism and to reject any form of alliance or partnership with groups that promote hate and violence.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

Democrats are stunned after Joe Biden was betrayed by his own federal court

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Democrats are stunned after Joe Biden was betrayed by his own federal court

Joe Biden and the radical Left are doing everything they can to win the courts over to their side. But they weren’t prepared for this recent development.

And Democrats are stunned after Joe Biden was betrayed by his own federal court.

In a significant legal victory for America, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced on Tuesday that a federal court has sided with the state in its lawsuit against the Biden administration’s reinterpretation of Title IX.

The court ruling strikes down the administration’s guidance, which had expanded the definition of “s*x” to include “s*xual orientation” and “gender identity,” threatening schools with the loss of federal funding if they maintained facilities and activities based on biological s*x.

The lawsuit, initiated by Paxton in June 2023, targeted the United States Department of Education, led by Secretary Miguel Cardona, and the Department of Justice, under Attorney General Merrick Garland.

Paxton’s suit demanded the court vacate the June 2021 guidance, arguing it was “not in accordance with law” and exceeded statutory authority by applying Title VII interpretations from the Bostock decision to Title IX.

Furthermore, the suit contended that the guidance documents represented substantive or legislative rules requiring notice-and-comment rule making, which had not been conducted.

U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor, presiding over the Northern District of Texas, delivered a 112-page decision firmly rejecting the Biden administration’s interpretation.

O’Connor emphasized that while Title IX prohibits s*x discrimination, it does not explicitly address discrimination based on gender identity.

He clarified that Title IX permits differentiation based on biological s*x for certain purposes, such as maintaining separate intimate facilities and athletic teams, thus allowing schools to treat individuals according to their biological s*x without considering subjective gender identity.

“Because of this prohibition on s*x discrimination, recipients of federal funds generally cannot discriminate based on someone’s s*x. However, nothing in the statute expressly prohibits discrimination based on gender identity or other unexpressed grounds,” O’Connor wrote.

He noted that contemporary dictionaries from the time Title IX was enacted in 1972 defined “s*x” in a strictly binary sense, supporting a biological interpretation.

O’Connor’s ruling underscored the legislative intent behind Title IX, which recognizes inherent biological differences between men and women.

“Title IX explicitly appreciates the innate biological variation between men and women that occasionally warrants differentiation—and even separation—to preserve educational opportunities and to promote respect for both s*xes,” he stated.

He criticized the Biden administration’s guidance for advancing an agenda “wholly divorced from the text, structure, and contemporary context of Title IX.”

The judge also pointed out the practical implications of the guidance, which placed recipients of Title IX funding, including Texas schools, in a precarious position.

Schools faced the dilemma of either complying with the federal guidance and violating state laws or adhering to state laws and risking the loss of substantial federal funding.

“To allow Defendants’ unlawful action to stand would be to functionally rewrite Title IX in a way that shockingly transforms American education and usurps a major question from Congress. That is not how our democratic system functions,” O’Connor concluded.

Attorney General Paxton celebrated the court’s decision as a triumph against federal overreach and a defense of traditional values.

“Joe Biden’s unlawful effort to weaponize Title IX for his extremist agenda has been stopped in its tracks,” Paxton declared.

“Threatening to withhold education funding by forcing states to accept ‘transgender’ policies that put women in danger was plainly illegal. Texas has prevailed on behalf of the entire Nation.”

This ruling is a major setback for the Biden administration’s broader push to force their radical Agenda on Americans across the nation.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Republicans deal historical blow to Biden and it could be the end for his whole family

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Republicans deal historical blow to Biden and it could be the end for his whole family

The corrupt Biden family has escaped justice for a long time. But now, it seems that things might be over for them.

Because Republicans have dealt a historic blow to Joe Biden, and it could be the end for his whole family.

In a historic move, the House of Representatives voted on Wednesday afternoon to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress.

This vote comes in response to Garland’s refusal to hand over the audio recordings of President Joe Biden’s interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur concerning the classified documents investigation.

The resolution passed by a narrow margin, 216 to 207, with one Republican joining 206 Democrats in opposition.

This decision marks a significant escalation in the ongoing battle between the Biden administration and congressional Republicans.

The controversy began in May when President Biden asserted executive privilege over the audio recordings.

White House counsel Ed Siskel emphasized in a letter that the audio lacked a legitimate need to be released and accused congressional Republicans of intending to manipulate the recordings for partisan purposes.

“The absence of a legitimate need for the audio recordings lays bare your likely goal — to chop them up, distort them, and use them for partisan political purposes,” Siskel wrote.

This assertion of executive privilege has been a significant point of contention, with Republicans arguing that transparency is necessary for accountability in the classified documents investigation.

Attorney General Garland has staunchly defended his decision not to release the audio. In early June, he told Congress that providing the audio would “chill cooperation with the department in future investigations.”

Garland argued that releasing the recordings could set a dangerous precedent, deterring witnesses from cooperating with future investigations out of fear that their interviews might be broadcast to the public and Congress.

Garland also highlighted the extensive cooperation his department had already provided. “We went to extraordinary lengths to ensure that the committee gets responses to its legitimate requests for information,” Garland said.

He noted that Special Counsel Hur’s report, transcripts of Biden’s interview, and more than five hours of testimony from Hur had all been made available to Congress.

The House Judiciary and Oversight Committees voted in May to approve a motion to hold Garland in contempt, citing the need for full transparency in the investigation.

Committee members argued that the audio recordings were crucial for understanding the context and tone of Biden’s statements, which could potentially reveal inconsistencies or gaps in the written transcripts.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has been a vocal advocate for obtaining the audio.

“The American people deserve to know the full truth about the President’s involvement in the mishandling of classified documents,” Jordan said. “Attorney General Garland’s refusal to comply with our subpoena undermines the principles of transparency and accountability.”

The vote to hold Garland in contempt is a significant political maneuver, reflecting the deep partisan divisions in Washington.

For many, this move underscores their commitment to holding the Biden administration accountable, particularly in light of what they perceive as a pattern of stonewalling and obfuscation.

“This administration has repeatedly shown that it has something to hide,” said Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), the House Minority Leader.

“By refusing to release the audio, Attorney General Garland is shielding the President from scrutiny. The American people deserve better.”

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Joe Biden’s horrific plan to push out 75% of Americans has been revealed

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Joe Biden’s horrific plan to push out 75% of Americans has been revealed

The radical Left wants nothing more than to destroy America and replace all of its citizens. But no one thought they would actually accomplish this.

But now, Joe Biden’s horrific plan to push out 75% of Americans has been revealed.

A recent report from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) has revealed a startling trend in the U.S. job market:

The majority of job growth since 2019 has gone to both legal and illegal immigrants, leaving many natural-born Americans struggling to find employment.

This new information sheds light on what The New York Times has described as a “historically strong job market,” and provides critical context for the dissatisfaction many voters feel towards President Joe Biden’s handling of the economy.

According to the CIS report, while the country has indeed added millions of jobs since the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, a disproportionate share of that employment growth has benefited immigrants.

This trend highlights a significant shift in the labor market dynamics under the Biden administration, which has overseen a record-breaking surge in illegal immigration.

The CIS analysis references a recent study by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which found that the number of employed natural-born Americans increased by only 971,000 from May 2019 to May 2024.

In stark contrast, the number of employed immigrants rose by 3.2 million during the same period.

This discrepancy raises questions about the prioritization of job opportunities and the economic policies that have been put in place.

A particularly troubling aspect of this trend is the declining labor force participation rate among natural-born Americans, especially men.

The labor force participation rate, which measures the share of people who are either working or actively looking for work, has seen a significant drop among U.S.-born men aged 25 to 54.

Currently, only 88.4 percent of men in this age group are participating in the labor force, one of the lowest levels ever recorded. This is a severe decline from the 96 percent participation rate seen in 1960.

The situation is even more dire for U.S.-born men in the same age range with a high school diploma or less.

Only 81.6 percent are currently participating in the labor force, a figure that is just a tenth of a percent above the lowest level ever recorded.

This decline in workforce participation among less-educated men suggests that they are being left behind in the current job market, further exacerbated by the influx of immigrant labor.

Advocates for increased immigration often argue that there are not enough workers without the addition of immigrants.

However, the CIS report challenges this narrative by pointing to the long-term deterioration in labor force participation among U.S.-born men.

The report argues that addressing this issue should be a priority, rather than relying on immigrant labor to fill the gaps.

Since taking office, Biden has presided over an unprecedented surge in illegal immigration. Officials have recorded over 9.5 million nationwide encounters and an estimated 1.7 million illegal immigrant gotaways.

The foreign-born population residing in the United States has also reached an all-time high of 51.6 million, marking an increase of 5.1 million since March 2022.

The Biden administration’s immigration policies have contributed to the displacement of natural-born American workers, particularly those with lower levels of education.

This displacement not only affects individual livelihoods, but also has broader social and economic consequences.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

U.S. State Dept helps place American journalists on Ukraine “hit-list”

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
U.S. State Dept helps place American journalists on Ukraine “hit-list”

The U.S. government has grown increasingly hostile towards Americans who speak the truth. But now they have crossed a major line in this recent attack.

And the U.S. State Dept has helped place American journalists on a Ukraine “hit-list.”

Republicans in Congress have launched an investigation into whether the U.S. State Department played a role in a Ukrainian NGO’s publication of an “Enemies list” that includes prominent GOP lawmakers, activists, and certain conservative news outlets.

The investigation follows concerns raised by Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) in a letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Wednesday.

The contentious list was published by Anatoly Bondarenko’s Data Journalism Agency (TEXTY) and is part of a study titled, “Rollercoaster: From Trumpists to Communists. The forces in the U.S. impeding aid to Ukraine and how they do it.”

The list names 338 individuals and 76 organizations, including The Daily Wire hosts Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, Michael Knowles, Matt Walsh, and Brett Cooper.

Vance and Gaetz, who are also listed in the study, criticized it as “largely an excuse to smear a large group of Americans who have been skeptical of aid to Ukraine.”

They accused the study of being part of a “coordinated media strategy” resembling a U.S.-targeting influence operation.

The lawmakers expressed concerns that U.S. taxpayer dollars might be funding these direct attacks on American citizens based on their political views.

“All Americans can agree that our tax dollars should not be supporting direct attacks on U.S. persons based upon reasonable political disagreement,” the letter from Vance and Gaetz states.

They requested various records from the State Department by June 28 to assess potential violations of U.S. law.

Rep. Jim Banks (R-IN), who is running for a Senate seat, drew attention to the issue last week with a viral post on X (formerly Twitter), warning about the “Enemies list” compiled by TEXTY. Banks, who also appears on the list, stated that his office would reach out to others included in the database.

Michael Knowles later shared a letter from Banks, thanking him for “informing me that a U.S. gov’t-affiliated Ukrainian NGO has put me on a hit list.”

Knowles added, “I hope that Congress will heed your advice and stop funding groups that target and endanger American citizens.”

In his letter to Knowles and Shapiro, Banks announced that he had contacted Republican leaders on the House Appropriations Committee, urging them to prevent the State Department and USAID from partnering with any foreign entities that harass Americans.

In a press release on Wednesday, Banks revealed that House Republicans successfully passed a provision to prohibit funding for TEXTY during the full House Appropriations Committee markup of the Fiscal Year 2025 State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs funding bill.

“It’s shameful for our agencies to be using Hoosiers’ tax dollars to collaborate with foreign groups that attempt to intimidate U.S. citizens and lawmakers,” Banks said. “I’d like to thank the Republicans on the Appropriations Committee for defunding any such work with TEXTY.”

The controversy surrounding the list has intensified the debate over U.S. support for Ukraine, especially amid accusations that the Biden administration has not done enough to ensure taxpayer dollars are used responsibly.

The investigation by Vance and Gaetz underscores the broader concerns within the GOP about government overreach and the potential misuse of federal funds for partisan purposes.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

Biden’s treasonous immigration policy hit millions with a brutal truth

Prudent Politics Staff
-
0
Biden’s treasonous immigration policy hit millions with a brutal truth

Joe Biden’s immigration policies are abysmal. But now, things have reached a new level.

Because Biden’s treasonous immigration policy hit millions with a brutal truth.

In a horrifying new move, the Biden administration is advancing a policy that could grant mass amnesty to illegal immigrants who entered the United States under the administration’s “parole” authority if they are married to U.S. citizens.

This policy, known as “parole in place,” is poised to make it easier for these individuals to secure amnesty and become American citizens.

The decision comes despite ongoing concerns about the administration’s handling of the border crisis and the integrity of the nation’s immigration system.

According to CBS News, the new policy aims to streamline the process for illegal immigrants married to U.S. citizens to adjust their status without having to leave the country.

Traditionally, these immigrants are required to exit the U.S. and re-enter legally to obtain a green card.

The administration’s use of parole authority has already been unprecedented.

President Biden has employed this authority to facilitate the entry of 30,000 immigrants each month from countries like Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.

Under U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) guidelines, parole is described as a mechanism that allows an immigrant to be present in the U.S. without being formally admitted for purposes of immigration law.

It is not intended to bypass normal visa processing procedures or replace established refugee processing channels.

Angelo Hernandez Fernandez, a spokesperson for the White House, stated that the administration continues “to explore a series of policy options, and we remain committed to taking action to address our broken immigration system.”

This latest policy shift is expected to benefit approximately 1.1 million illegal immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens.

Many states argue that the Biden administration has overstepped its bounds, using parole in ways that circumvent established immigration laws and procedures.

In defense of the new policy, the administration asserts that it is a necessary step to address the complexities and inefficiencies of the current immigration system.

However, countless Americans contend that this approach undermines the rule of law and incentivizes illegal immigration by providing an easier path to legal status and citizenship.

The Biden administration’s approach to immigration has been a point of contention since day one.

The president has faced criticism from many for a lenient stance on border security and illegal immigration. This latest policy decision is likely to intensify that criticism.

Under President Biden’s tenure, the U.S. has seen record levels of illegal immigration.

The administration’s policies, including the widespread use of parole, have been blamed for exacerbating the border crisis.

Many people point out that by making it easier for illegal immigrants to gain legal status, the administration is encouraging more people to enter the country unlawfully.

Immigration laws exist to protect the sovereignty and security of the nation.

By effectively granting amnesty to potentially millions of illegal immigrants, the Biden administration is disregarding the legal framework designed to ensure that immigration is conducted in a controlled and lawful manner.

As the Biden administration pushes forward with this policy, it is likely to face robust opposition from Republican lawmakers and state officials.

Legal battles are expected to ensue, potentially reaching the Supreme Court.

The outcome of these challenges will have significant implications for the future of U.S. immigration policy.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

1...313233...131Page 32 of 131

2024 Copyright © All rights reserved.

Quick Links

Must Read

Popular Articles