The Left has tried their hardest to cover for Joe Biden. But the latest statistics are revealing everything.

And new data regarding Biden’s policies has exposed a shocking reality for millions of Americans.

In a troubling sign of the economic pressures facing Americans, a recent Fox News poll has found that more than half of the country is planning to forgo summer vacations this year.

The poll, conducted among 1,126 American voters between May 10 and 13, revealed that 55 percent of respondents will be staying home.

The primary reason cited by nearly three-quarters of those opting out of travel was the rising cost of living, which has put an additional strain on their finances.

The poll’s findings underscore the financial struggles many Americans are facing as inflation continues to drive up the cost of essentials.

Among those not taking a vacation this year, 73 percent said it was due to financial constraints, while 15 percent pointed to a lack of time.

The margin of error for the poll was +/- 3 percent, providing a clear indication that economic hardships are a significant factor in people’s decisions to stay home.

Interestingly, Democrats were slightly more likely than Republicans to travel this summer, with 45 percent of Democrats planning trips compared to 41 percent of Republicans. Independents were the least likely to travel, at just 37 percent.

The survey asked respondents to what extent groceries, housing, health care, and utilities were impacting their financial situation.

The vast majority of Americans identified each of these categories as a “problem,” reflecting widespread economic strain.

In particular, the rising price of fuel emerged as a significant concern. Nearly all respondents indicated that the increasing cost of gas was problematic, with 49 percent calling it a “major problem.”

The Biden administration recently attempted to cover up reality with a media stunt where they claimed they would help alleviate these Summer pressures.

“The Biden-Harris Administration is laser-focused on lowering prices at the pump for American families, especially as drivers hit the road for summer driving season,” said Department of Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm in a statement.

“By strategically releasing this reserve in between Memorial Day and July 4th, we are ensuring sufficient supply flows to the tri-state and northeast at a time hardworking Americans need it the most.”

Despite these efforts, the administration’s approach has drawn criticism from millions of Americans.

Many highlight that Biden’s policies, particularly those related to energy and economic regulation, have exacerbated inflation and increased the cost of living.

They point to the administration’s cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline and restrictions on domestic oil production as factors contributing to higher fuel prices.

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) has been vocal about the administration’s failures, stating, “The Biden administration’s policies have crippled American energy independence and driven up costs for every family. Releasing strategic reserves is a temporary band-aid, not a solution.”

The poll’s findings reflect broader economic concerns among the American populace. Inflation has been at the highest levels in decades, affecting everything from food to housing to healthcare.

As the cost of living continues to rise, many Americans are forced to cut back on discretionary spending, including vacations.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Left hates the idea of the American people knowing the truth about anything. And they have shown that they will do whatever it takes to cover up their corruption.

But now, a critical IRS investigation was blocked by Biden’s DOJ in order to cover up major secrets.

In a stunning revelation, IRS supervisory special agent and whistleblower Gary Shapley has claimed that the IRS was prevented from investigating Kevin Morris, a key benefactor of Hunter Biden, following a classified briefing with the CIA.

Shapley’s testimony, released by House Republicans, underscores serious concerns regarding the handling of the investigation into Hunter Biden’s potential criminal activities.

According to Shapley, Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) Lesley Wolf informed the prosecution team investigating Hunter Biden that they could not pursue Morris as a witness.

This directive came after Wolf and DOJ Tax Attorney Jack Morgan attended a classified briefing at CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.

“During a recurring prosecution team conference call in or around late August 2021, AUSA Lesley Wolf told the team that she and DOJ Tax Attorney Jack Morgan had recently returned from the Central Intelligence Agency headquarters in Langley, Virginia, where they had been summoned to discuss Kevin Morris,” Shapley testified.

Kevin Morris, a prominent entertainment lawyer in Hollywood, controls Hunter Biden’s stake in a Chinese private equity firm and has reportedly spent over $6.5 million on Hunter Biden’s legal fees, child support, and luxurious living arrangements in California.

At the time of the CIA briefing, Hunter Biden was under investigation for allegedly failing to pay at least $1.4 million in taxes from 2014 through 2019.

Shapley’s testimony highlights the significant role Morris played in Hunter Biden’s financial dealings.

The decision to block the IRS from investigating Morris as a witness raises serious questions about potential interference and obstruction in the investigation.

“AUSA Wolf stated that they were provided a classified briefing in relation to Mr. Morris and as a result, we could no longer pursue him as a witness,” Shapley continued.

He noted that despite pressing Wolf for more information, she did not elaborate due to the classified nature of the briefing.

Shapley’s concerns were further compounded when Wolf ignored multiple attempts by him to arrange a classified briefing on the information the CIA had provided about Morris.

This, according to Shapley, served as another deviation from normal investigative processes.

Shapley, who supervised line agents investigating Hunter Biden, was removed from the investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice in May 2023 after he provided protected disclosures concerning prosecutors’ alleged mishandling of the case.

His testimony paints a troubling picture of potential interference at the highest levels.

“McKenzie referenced a clearance level of T S – HCS-O as a compartmentalized section required to receive the briefing,” Shapley recalled.

He suggested that this clearance level, likely CIA-specific, was not held by DOJ Tax Attorney Morgan or AUSA Wolf, possibly indicating another roadblock to deny investigators access to critical information.

These revelations come at a time when the Biden administration is already under intense scrutiny.

House Republicans have seized upon Shapley’s testimony as further evidence of the administration’s mishandling of the Hunter Biden investigation.

“Hunter Biden has shown once again he believes there are two systems of justice in this country – one for his family, and one for everyone else,” House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith said in a statement.

This new information has troubled many Americans, and we must not rest until the whole truth is exposed.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

For years Republicans have been warning of interference from the Left. But while Democrats try to disregard the facts, this cannot be hidden away.

And new proof of major FBI interference has completely rocked the nation.

In a startling revelation, whistleblowers have informed top Republican senators that former Secretary of State, under Obama, John Kerry actively obstructed the FBI’s efforts to execute arrest warrants against individuals in the U.S. who were supporting Iran’s illegal weapons programs.

These claims suggest a severe breach in national security protocols and have ignited a fierce political debate.

Senators Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Ron Johnson (R-WI) stated that for nearly two decades, both Republican and Democrat administrations imposed stringent sanctions on Iranian individuals, companies, and organizations involved in nuclear proliferation, ballistic missile development, and support for terrorist groups.

These measures were intended to hold Iran accountable and prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons.

The Obama administration, despite its controversial Iran Nuclear Deal, publicly committed to preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

One of Obama’s executive orders and the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 were designed to impose severe consequences on Iran for defying international norms.

However, new allegations suggest that while the administration publicly supported these measures, Kerry’s actions behind the scenes told a different story.

According to the whistleblowers, Kerry’s interference hampered FBI operations, preventing the arrest of individuals illegally supporting Iran’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and ballistic missile programs.

The senators outlined these allegations in a detailed letter, indicating that Justice Department and FBI leadership, including then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and then-FBI Director James Comey, failed to counteract Kerry’s obstruction.

“Kerry actively interfered with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) executing arrest warrants on individuals in the U.S. illegally supporting Iranian efforts, including financial efforts, to develop weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and its ballistic missile program,” the letter stated.

The letter cited unclassified FBI email records from August 25, 2017, which detailed at least eight instances where the State Department under Kerry’s leadership blocked FBI efforts related to the Iran deal.

In six of these cases, the FBI lost the opportunity to arrest the primary suspects.

One of these individuals was reportedly on the Terrorism Watch List, and another managed to return to Iran.

In one alarming case, the State Department allegedly blocked the FBI’s plan to arrest a suspect mid-flight, forcing the individual to leave the U.S. upon arrival.

The records indicate that at least two targets were arrested only after the State Department lifted its block following the Trump administration’s assumption of office.

The whistleblowers assert that Kerry’s actions were politically motivated.

The interference reportedly became so problematic that then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch had to personally address the issue with Kerry.

The senators’ letter underscores the severity of these actions, suggesting that the Obama/Biden administration’s State Department compromised critical law enforcement operations for political reasons.

“The records provided to our offices show that the Obama/Biden administration’s State Department, under the leadership of John Kerry, actively and persistently interfered with FBI operations pertaining to lawful arrests of known terrorists, members of Iranian proliferation networks, and other criminals providing material support for Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs,” the letter emphasized.

“The records also show that DOJ and FBI leadership apparently allowed it to happen until the Trump administration altered course.”

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

While the Biden family and the radical Left try to claim Hunter’s innocence, the American people know the truth. And now, the Bidens have nowhere to hide.

Because new evidence exposing Hunter Biden’s lies have left the Biden family scrambling.

In a significant development, the House Ways and Means Committee has voted to release a tranche of documents that prove Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, lied under oath during a closed-door deposition earlier this year.

Fox News: House committee votes to release documents from Hunter deposition, says they prove he lied under oath. pic.twitter.com/oy6MNxrtv8

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) May 22, 2024

The decision to release these documents, which were previously protected under tax code confidentiality laws, comes after whistleblowers provided crucial evidence about Hunter Biden’s finances.

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO) announced the move, stating that the documents reveal Hunter Biden lied at least three times during his deposition in February.

The committee’s mark-up session on Wednesday resulted in a vote to make these documents public, with their release expected imminently.

The documents, reportedly spanning 100 pages, were submitted by whistleblowers involved in investigating Hunter Biden’s financial activities.

According to the New York Post, these documents offer a detailed account of alleged discrepancies and falsehoods in Hunter Biden’s testimony.

“Hunter Biden has shown once again he believes there are two systems of justice in this country – one for his family, and one for everyone else,” Chairman Smith said in a statement to Fox News.

“Not only did Hunter Biden refuse to comply with his initial subpoena until threatened with criminal contempt, but he then came before Congress and lied.”

Smith emphasized that the committee’s investigation is not a personal vendetta against Hunter Biden but a necessary step to ensure equal application of the law.

“Hunter Biden’s lies under oath, and obstruction of a congressional investigation into his family’s potential corruption, call into question other pieces of his testimony,” Smith explained.

“The newly released evidence affirms, once again, the only witnesses who can be trusted to tell the truth in this investigation are the IRS whistleblowers.”

This revelation comes on the heels of Hunter Biden being charged with two federal offenses: one for making false statements while purchasing a firearm and another related to federal tax violations.

The combination of these charges and the committee’s findings paint a troubling picture of a potential pattern of deception and legal improprieties.

The timing of this disclosure is particularly significant, as it could have broader implications for President Biden and his administration.

The release of these documents will undoubtedly fuel further investigations and hearings, keeping Hunter Biden’s legal issues in the spotlight.

Republican lawmakers have hailed the move as a victory for transparency and accountability.

“The American people deserve to know the truth about Hunter Biden’s actions and how they may have been protected by political connections,” said Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH).

As the documents are set to be released, all eyes will be on the specifics of the allegations and the evidence provided by the whistleblowers.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story and more.

While Joe Biden and the Left claim to care about the Constitution, their actions tell a different story. And this most recent incident has millions of Americans outraged.

As President Biden’s administration has been hit with a massive religious lawsuit that has people shocked.

A revered Catholic group, the Knights of Columbus, has filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration, alleging religious discrimination after their traditional Memorial Day Mass at a national cemetery was prohibited for the second consecutive year.

The Knights of Columbus have conducted this service at Poplar Grove National Cemetery in Petersburg, Virginia, for the past 60 years, making this denial a significant deviation from longstanding tradition.

On Tuesday, the Knights of Columbus sought a temporary restraining order against the National Park Service in Virginia following the refusal of their permit.

The group claimed that this decision is a violation of the First Amendment, which guarantees the free exercise of religion.

For six decades, the Knights of Columbus have honored fallen soldiers with a solemn Mass at Poplar Grove National Cemetery.

This annual event has been a cornerstone of the local community’s Memorial Day observance, drawing participants from all walks of life to pay their respects.

However, for the second year in a row, the National Park Service denied the necessary permit, citing regulatory constraints.

“The policy and the decision blocking the Knights of Columbus from continuing their long-standing religious tradition is a blatant violation of the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA),” stated a partner for the law firm representing the group.

“We urge the court to grant our restraining order and allow the Knights to hold their service this Memorial Day.”

Alexa Viets, superintendent of the Petersburg National Battlefield, where the cemetery is located, provided an explanation for the decision to deny the permit.

“National Cemeteries are established as national shrines in tribute to those who have died in service to our country, and as such, any special activities within the cemetery are reserved for a limited set of official commemorative activities that have a connection to military service or have a historic and commemorative significance for the particular national cemetery,” Viets stated.

She further elaborated that federal regulations prohibit the authorization of special events within national cemeteries to maintain an atmosphere of solemnity, quiet contemplation, and tranquility.

The parks have classified religious services as “demonstrations,” which have been prohibited since 1986.

Despite these regulations, the Knights of Columbus argue that their prayer service has been a permitted and integral part of the Memorial Day tradition at the site for decades until recently.

Roger Byron, senior counsel for First Liberty, a legal organization representing the Knights of Columbus, criticized the National Park Service’s decision as a violation of the group’s religious freedoms.

“The National Park Service is way out of line,” Byron said. “This is the kind of unlawful discrimination and censorship RFRA and the First Amendment were enacted to prevent. Hopefully, the court will grant the Knights the relief they need to keep this honorable tradition alive.”

The Knights of Columbus argue that the prohibition of their religious service constitutes a direct affront to their constitutional rights.

By denying the permit, they contend that the National Park Service is not only disregarding decades of tradition but also infringing on the group’s ability to freely practice their faith.

“This is a clear case of government overreach,” Byron added. “The Biden administration needs to recognize that religious groups have the right to assemble and practice their faith without undue interference from federal authorities.”

As the legal battle unfolds, the outcome will be closely watched by religious and civil liberties groups nationwide.

The case underscores the ongoing tension between religious freedom and government regulation, a conflict that remains at the heart of many contemporary legal disputes.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Donald Trump knew that running for office again would be dangerous. But still, people are surprised at the line that has now been crossed.

And Trump was attacked by a former liberal leader who has made serious threats.

In a recent appearance on MSNBC, former FBI Director James Comey launched a scathing attack on former President Donald Trump, warning that Trump’s re-election would pose a significant threat to the integrity of the FBI and the Justice Department.

Comey’s remarks have sparked widespread debate and concern, particularly among those who value the rule of law and the independence of these critical institutions.

His comments came during an interview with MSNBC host Alex Wagner, where he discussed the implications of Trump’s potential return to the White House.

Reflecting on the current court case involving Trump, Comey expressed confidence in the resilience of the American legal system, stating, “The rule of law in this country, especially the court system, has passed its stress test, slow on the federal side, but this is a great example for our people.”

However, Wagner pressed Comey further, asking whether he was concerned about the unprecedented challenges that could arise if Trump were to be re-elected.

“Are you concerned that it may get a test unlike any other if Donald Trump is re-elected?” she asked. “When you think about a second Trump administration, what do you think the implications would be for the FBI?”

Comey did not mince words in his response. “Serious,” he replied. “For the Justice Department and the FBI, because Trump is coming for those institutions. He knows their power and I think he has regrets that he didn’t work hard enough to corrupt them last time. So he’s coming for them and that’s a danger for all Americans.”

He elaborated on his fears, suggesting that Trump would appoint individuals who are willing to do his bidding, compromising the independence and integrity of these institutions.

“He’s gonna put people in positions in those organizations. He didn’t have All-Stars last time; he’ll have the bottom of the barrel this time … people who will want to do his will and that should worry every American,” Comey warned. “This election matters because of a reason like that.”

Comey also used the opportunity to make an impassioned plea for voter participation.

“People have to participate. You cannot sit on the sidelines. I don’t care how you feel about Joe Biden, you must vote for him because the consequences on the other side are too severe,” he urged.

Comey’s criticisms of Trump come against a backdrop of his own controversial tenure as FBI Director.

In June 2018, ABC News reported that the Justice Department’s internal watchdog, Inspector General Michael Horowitz, concluded that Comey had defied authority during his time at the FBI.

The draft report reportedly used the word “insubordinate” to describe Comey’s actions.

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) initiated an investigation following a referral from the FBI, which determined that Comey may have shared memos containing classified information with individuals outside the FBI.

The OIG’s findings were damning, stating, “Comey violated applicable policies and his FBI Employment Agreement by providing one of the unclassified memos that contained official FBI information, including sensitive investigative information, to his friend with instructions for the friend to share the contents of the memo with a reporter.”

The OIG further noted that Comey, while serving as FBI Director, kept copies of four of the seven memos in a personal safe at his home and, after his removal from the position, violated FBI policies by failing to notify the FBI that he had retained them.

Additionally, he provided copies of the memos to his three private attorneys without FBI authorization. These actions, the OIG concluded, were in clear violation of his obligations and FBI policies.

Many people understand that Comey’s allegations are politically motivated and that he, along with the entire Radical Left, is willing to do whatever it takes to keep Trump from office.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Joe Biden might have the worst foreign policy disasters in modern history. But recent events have left people shocked.

And Biden’s recent foreign policy failures have led to a shocking Congressional admittance.

Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) fiercely criticized Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Tuesday during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, targeting the Biden administration’s foreign policy approach, which he described as catastrophic.

“You have presided over the worst foreign policy disaster of modern times,” Cruz stated at the beginning of his confrontation with Blinken.

“When Joe Biden became president, he inherited peace and prosperity in the world. We now have two simultaneous wars waging—the worst war in Europe since World War II and the worst war in the Middle East in 50 years. Both, I believe, were caused by this administration’s consistent weakness.”

🚨WATCH: Senator Cruz RIPS Secretary of State Blinken for catastrophic foreign policy failures of Biden administration🚨 pic.twitter.com/g8hkgThS3u

— Senator Ted Cruz (@SenTedCruz) May 21, 2024

Cruz continued to lambast the administration, arguing that its foreign policy strategy was “precisely backwards from what a rational American foreign policy should be.”

He accused the Biden administration of attacking and weakening U.S. allies while simultaneously emboldening and strengthening U.S. adversaries.

Cruz took Blinken to task over a report from The Washington Post, which indicated that the Biden administration was “working urgently to stave off a full-scale Israeli invasion of Rafah” by offering Israel valuable assistance, including sensitive intelligence to help the Israeli military pinpoint Hamas leaders and locate the group’s hidden tunnels.

Blinken denied the accuracy of the report, asserting that the administration has not withheld such critical information from Israel.

However, Cruz was unrelenting.

“[Israel is] quite aware you disagree with their plan to k*ll the Hamas terrorists because you and the president have vocally said it,” Cruz retorted. “To be clear, your State Department, on the morning of October 7th, sent out a tweet telling Israel not to engage in military retaliation. I called you out at three in the morning, and you deleted that tweet. The next day, you personally, on October 8, sent a tweet saying you’d spoken with the Turkish foreign minister and Israel should not retaliate. From the very beginning, the Biden administration has consistently at every stage told Israel—and by the way, when I called your tweet out, you deleted it again—at every stage, you have been telling Israel, ‘do not k*ll the terrorists.’ And that has been from day one.”

Cruz didn’t stop at Israel; he also grilled Blinken on the administration’s approach to Iran.

He accused the administration of withholding weapons from Israel and relaxing sanctions enforcement against Iran, actions he claimed have enabled the Iranian regime to generate tens of billions of dollars in oil revenue.

“The relaxation of sanctions has provided a financial lifeline to Iran, a nation that continues to chant ‘Death to America’ and supports terrorism across the globe,” Cruz argued. “This administration’s policies are empowering our enemies and endangering our allies.”

Cruz’s broadside against Blinken and the Biden administration touched on other areas as well.

He highlighted the chaos in Afghanistan following the U.S. withdrawal, which many have viewed as a failure of leadership and planning.

The senator argued that the withdrawal not only led to the rapid resurgence of the Taliban but also emboldened other adversaries around the world, showcasing American weakness.

“The disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan has had ripple effects worldwide,” Cruz said. “It signaled to our enemies that the United States is no longer the resolute leader of the free world. This perception has undoubtedly contributed to the current crises we see unfolding in Europe and the Middle East.”

Cruz emphasized that the Biden administration’s foreign policy failures have severe implications for U.S. national security.

By weakening relationships with key allies and emboldening adversaries, he argued, the administration is undermining the safety and stability that previous administrations worked hard to maintain.

“National security is about strength and resolve,” Cruz concluded. “This administration has shown neither. Instead of standing firm against threats, it has repeatedly capitulated, putting American lives and our national security at risk.”

Cruz’s pointed criticism of Blinken and the Biden administration reflects broader concerns that the current leadership is failing to protect U.S. interests abroad.

As global crises continue to unfold, the pressure on the Biden administration to reassess and recalibrate its foreign policy strategy is only likely to intensify.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Left has been seemingly attempting to destroy America for many years. But now America has shown them that it won’t be so easy.

And a Democrat city has suffered a devastating loss at the hands of American patriots.

In a resounding statement against soft-on-crime policies, voters in Multnomah County, Oregon, in the Portland area, decisively ousted incumbent District Attorney Mike Schmidt in Tuesday’s election.

Schmidt, who was backed by controversial billionaire George Soros, lost in a landslide to longtime prosecutor Nathan Vasquez.

Fox 12 called the race at approximately 9:30 pm local time, showing Vasquez leading with 58 percent of the vote compared to Schmidt’s 42 percent.

In Oregon’s non-partisan primary system, a candidate who secures over 50 percent of the vote is declared the winner of the election but will not take office until January 2025.

Nathan Vasquez, a veteran prosecutor with 24 years of experience in the District Attorney’s office, emerged victorious by tapping into the frustrations of Portland residents who have grown increasingly disillusioned with Schmidt’s tenure.

Vasquez began his career at the District Attorney’s office immediately after law school and worked his way up to a supervisory position, earning a reputation as a dedicated and effective prosecutor.

Vasquez’s campaign resonated with voters by focusing on Schmidt’s Radical policies, which many blame for the rampant homelessness and drug problems plaguing downtown Portland.

Under Schmidt’s leadership, crime rates have surged, and public safety has deteriorated, prompting widespread calls for change.

Since taking office in 2020, Schmidt has faced mounting criticism for his approach to law enforcement.

Adding to Schmidt’s woes was a damning report from the Oregon Bureau of Labor & Industries, which found substantial evidence supporting former prosecutor Amber Kinney’s claims of a toxic work environment.

Kinney, who resigned in 2022, accused Schmidt of fostering a culture of fear, intimidation, and retaliation, and of hindering the advancement of women in the office.

Further allegations surfaced from a senior prosecutor who accused Schmidt of making promotion and clemency decisions based on political loyalties rather than established policies.

These revelations painted a troubling picture of Schmidt’s administration, further eroding public trust.

Despite a last-minute influx of campaign funds from groups linked to far-left mega-donor George Soros, Schmidt’s campaign could not overcome the extensive baggage and public dissatisfaction.

Soros has been known for supporting progressive radical district attorneys across the country, many of whom have faced backlash for their policies.

The election results aligned with recent polling that indicated Vasquez was on track for a significant victory.

Schmidt’s defeat is the latest in a series of setbacks for progressive district attorneys nationwide.

In San Francisco, voters recalled activist DA Chesa Boudin two years ago, frustrated by his social justice reforms that coincided with a spike in crime.

Similarly, in Chicago, Kim Foxx chose not to seek re-election after facing criticism for her handling of criminal cases.

The pattern suggests a growing public rejection of policies perceived as prioritizing ideological agendas over public safety.

Voters in cities across the United States are increasingly demanding accountability and a return to effective law enforcement.

The defeat of Mike Schmidt underscores the importance of balancing progressive reforms with the need to maintain law and order. As cities across America grapple with rising crime rates, the message from Portland is clear: voters are ready for change.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Left’s foreign policies have been under scrutiny ever since Biden took office. But no one expected things to get this bad.

And now, a former Democrat advisor reveals the Left’s foreign policy failures.

Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who served under former President Barack Obama, criticized American political leaders for their inadequate efforts in educating the public about the significance of foreign policy issues and their impact on the United States.

Gates shared his views during a Sunday interview on CBS News’s “Face The Nation” with Margaret Brennan.

Gates emphasized the critical need for American leaders to communicate the relevance of foreign policy to the everyday lives of citizens.

He argued that without a comprehensive understanding of international affairs, Americans might underestimate the direct and indirect effects of global issues on their country.

“I think our leaders need to bring these issues home to the American people in a very direct way,” Gates stated.

He suggested using historical examples to illustrate how ignoring foreign threats can lead to severe consequences, including the loss of American lives in conflicts. “The world isn’t going to ignore us just because we think we can ignore the world,” he added.

Gates stressed that addressing foreign policy challenges early is crucial to prevent them from becoming significant, costly problems later on.

He highlighted the importance of proactive engagement with global issues to safeguard national security and economic stability.

Furthermore, Gates underscored the interconnectedness of the global economy and how disruptions overseas can have profound effects on the domestic economy.

He criticized the lack of accessible data that would help Americans understand the extent to which their local economies depend on international trade.

“I’ve always thought we made a big mistake in not having data available where you could go into a congressional district and say, ‘Do you realize how much of the economy of your county or your town depends on exports or imports around the world because our economy is so integrated?’” Gates explained.

He advocated for a more transparent and informative approach to show how global economic activities influence local economic conditions.

Gates’ remarks highlight a significant gap in public understanding of foreign policy and its domestic implications.

This disconnect, he argued, makes it challenging for the public to appreciate the necessity of U.S. involvement in global affairs.

By failing to effectively communicate these connections, political leaders risk fostering a sense of isolationism that could ultimately harm the nation’s interests.

The former defense secretary’s comments come at a time when the U.S. faces numerous international challenges, including geopolitical tensions, trade disputes, and global security threats.

Gates believes that educating the public on these matters is essential for building a more informed and supportive citizenry.

He pointed out that many Americans might not realize how their livelihoods are intertwined with global economic dynamics.

By making this information more accessible, Gates hopes to bridge the gap between foreign policy and everyday life, helping citizens understand why international engagement is vital for their well-being.

Gates also suggested that this educational effort should be a bipartisan endeavor.

He emphasized that foreign policy should not be a divisive issue but rather a collective responsibility that transcends political affiliations.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

It is no secret that Joe Biden and the Radical Left hate America. But the lengths that they are willing to go to in order to keep Trump out of office are crazy.

And a Trump critic has revealed the left’s shocking secret plan and the world is horrified.

Renowned director Oliver Stone has voiced strong opinions about what he terms “lawfare” being used against former President Donald J. Trump.

In a recent interview with Variety, Stone described the numerous legal battles Trump faces as part of a larger, more insidious strategy to undermine political figures through judicial means.

Stone, celebrated for his politically charged documentaries, discussed this concept while promoting his latest film about Brazilian President Lula da Silva.

Lula, a favorite among American progressives including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and President Joe Biden, endured his own legal ordeals, which Stone sees as analogous to Trump’s current situation.

Lula’s corruption probe led to a 580-day imprisonment, a fate Stone warns could befall Trump through similar tactics.

“The charges on both sides of the Trump-Biden election are pretty wild — that Biden is corrupt and Trump is corrupt,” Stone told Variety. “It’s a new form of warfare. It’s called lawfare. And that’s what they’re using against Trump.”

Stone elaborated on the growing trend of using the legal system as a weapon, noting that this phenomenon is not isolated to the United States but is increasingly observed worldwide.

He pointed out that Trump faces four trials with numerous charges, many of which he described as “minor,” regardless of one’s political stance.

“I think there are interesting parallels here in America, as well as all over the world,” Stone remarked. “[Trump’s] got four trials and some of these charges, whether you’re for him or against him, they are minor.”

Though not a supporter of Trump, Stone criticized the superficial handling of corruption charges against political figures, arguing that such accusations often fail to address deeper systemic issues.

He underscored that corruption is an age-old problem, embedded in societies since ancient times.

“Corruption is a way of life,” the director stated. “It goes back to the Greeks, the Romans, and before that the Babylonians. There’s corruption all through history, so let’s not be Pollyannas about it and think we’re ‘America the clean’ and we’re better than anybody else. That’s such bullsh*t.”

Stone’s skepticism towards the legal cases against Trump stems from his belief that money-driven politics are the true root of corruption.

He argued that politicians manipulate public perception through financial means, a practice that inherently breeds corruption.

“In a broad sense of the word, it’s manipulation of your office,” Stone explained. “You’re trying to control what the perception of you is in the public eye. And if you’re willing to pay money for that, that’s part of the concept of corruption, isn’t it?”

Stone’s reflections on corruption extended beyond American borders, emphasizing that no country is immune to these issues.

He criticized the notion of America as a paragon of virtue, highlighting the deep-seated corruption within both major political parties and advocating for a more diverse political system.

“There is life, there is death and there’s corruption,” Stone said. “But it’s a scale. You can’t point fingers at another country and say that is a corrupt country and that president has to be removed from office or we have to attack them or end a regime. Who are we to say those things when we are deeply corrupt? Look at the [two] parties. We should be multi-party and we should have public money in politics like they do in Poland. Or look at the English and the French models.”

The Radical Left is doing whatever is necessary in order to stop Trump from taking office, and they do not care about legality.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

With Donald Trump not bowing to their demands, the Left has tried to change their tactics. But now, they are not liking where things are going.

And Republicans have made shocking demands that expose just how much trouble Biden is in.

Multiple prominent Republicans are calling for President Joe Biden to submit to a drug test before debating former President Donald Trump.

The calls come amid concerns about Biden’s mental acuity and alleged use of performance-enhancing substances to boost his public appearances.

These demands gained traction following Biden’s notably energetic performance during his State of the Union address earlier this year, which stood in stark contrast to his often more subdued public demeanor.

Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina addressed the issue on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures,” suggesting that a drug test for the president would be beneficial.

“Why not?” Scott responded when asked about the necessity of such a test. “The truth of the matter is if you saw the State of the Union and you watched that performance, it was surreal. There was something going on, and if we could find the truth of what it was, we’re all better off. If it takes artificial stimulation to make the President of the United States perform, how often can he do that?”

Representative Anna Paulina Luna of Florida echoed Scott’s sentiments, emphasizing the importance of ensuring the president’s mental fitness given the gravity of his responsibilities.

“We’re talking about someone who has the ability to launch nukes,” Luna stated.

She linked these concerns to the ongoing efforts by House Republicans to obtain audio recordings of Biden’s interview with former special counsel Robert Hur, which the White House has shielded under claims of executive privilege.

Former President Trump has been the most vocal advocate for drug testing Biden, repeatedly questioning the current president’s cognitive abilities and hinting at possible artificial enhancement.

During a rally in Minnesota last week, Trump reiterated his demand for a pre-debate drug test. “I just want to debate this guy … and I’m going to demand a drug test too, by the way,” Trump declared. “I am. No, I really am.”

Referring to Biden’s State of the Union performance, Trump said, “I don’t want him coming in like the State of the Union. He was high as a kite. I said is that Joe up there? … And by the end of the evening … he was exhausted, right? No, we’re going to demand a drug test.”

North Carolina Representative Greg Murphy, a trained surgeon, supported these claims, suggesting that Biden’s performance during the State of the Union was likely enhanced by some form of stimulant.

“I absolutely believe that from a medical viewpoint, actually I have a little bit of good knowledge that that happened,” Murphy said. “He can’t stand it. He can’t stand under the lights for that long. And I don’t think he can keep a concept in his brain that long.”

The insistence on drug testing stems from broader concerns about Biden’s fitness for office.

At 81 years old, Biden is the oldest president in U.S. history, and his opponents have frequently highlighted moments of apparent confusion or memory lapses as evidence of cognitive decline.

These concerns have fueled the idea that Biden is not fully capable of handling the demands of the presidency, particularly in high-pressure situations like debates.

The debate over Biden’s mental fitness is not new. Throughout his presidency, Republicans have questioned his ability to perform the duties of the office effectively. This latest push for a drug test is seen by many as an extension of these ongoing concerns.

While the White House has not directly responded to the latest calls for a drug test, it has consistently defended Biden’s mental and physical fitness.

White House officials have pointed to Biden’s packed schedule and active engagement in policy discussions as evidence of his capability.

Nonetheless, the administration has not addressed the specific allegations regarding possible artificial stimulation during public appearances.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

The Radical Left cannot afford any setbacks if they hope to keep the White House. But now, things are not looking good.

And Joe Biden has suffered a massive loss that could cripple his re-election chances.

President Joe Biden is facing a significant decline in support among Black voters, as highlighted in recent polling and interviews conducted by the New York Times.

This trend is particularly noticeable in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where many Black voters feel that Biden has neglected domestic issues in favor of foreign conflicts.

The Times report revealed that out of nearly two dozen residents interviewed in predominantly Black neighborhoods in Philadelphia, only eight expressed a commitment to voting for Biden in the upcoming election.

Many of those interviewed indicated that they were considering abstaining from voting entirely or casting their vote for former President Donald Trump.

This sentiment reflects a broader dissatisfaction with Biden’s performance, particularly concerning immigration, rising living costs, and his focus on international matters.

One of the interviewed residents, Latasha Humphrey, encapsulated the prevailing frustration by stating, “I don’t care about what goes on overseas. I care about where I live.”

This sentiment underscores a common belief among these voters that Biden has prioritized issues like the conflict in Ukraine over addressing the pressing needs of Americans in local communities.

Although Biden still holds a lead among Black voters overall, recent polls suggest an unprecedented shift in support.

A CNN poll found that Trump is currently polling at 22 percent among Black voters, a historically high figure for a modern Republican nominee.

By contrast, Trump received just 9 percent of the Black vote in the 2020 election. This shift signals a growing discontent with the current administration’s policies and priorities.

Philadelphia City Councilman Isaiah Thomas highlighted the challenge facing Biden’s campaign, stating, “It’s going to be easy to convince people not to vote for Trump. It’s going to be hard to convince people to vote for Biden. Those are two totally different fights.”

Thomas’s remarks emphasize the difficulty Biden’s campaign faces in mobilizing voters who feel disillusioned and overlooked.

Jasmine Harris, Biden’s Director of Black Media, acknowledged the campaign’s efforts to target Black voters with the same level of resources allocated to traditional swing voters.

“We’ll really see the results of our campaign’s outreach to Black voters closer to Election Day,” Harris said. Despite these efforts, the challenge remains significant as Biden’s approval continues to wane among a demographic that was crucial to his 2020 victory.

The concerns expressed by Philadelphia’s Black voters are not isolated incidents but part of a broader trend.

Many voters feel that Biden’s administration has not delivered on promises made during the campaign, particularly regarding economic opportunities, education, and healthcare. Instead, they perceive a disconnect between the administration’s focus and the everyday struggles faced by many Americans.

Biden’s declining support among Black voters poses a significant threat to his re-election campaign.

In 2020, Black voters played a pivotal role in securing his victory, particularly in swing states like Pennsylvania.

Losing their support could jeopardize his chances of winning in 2024.

The Biden campaign must therefore redouble its efforts to engage with Black communities, address their concerns, and deliver tangible results.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story and more.