The Left is losing ground quick. And it’s only getting worse.

Because Donald Trump just flipped the script on Democrats.

A Big Win for U.S. Jobs

President Donald Trump kicked off the week with a major announcement on Monday, revealing that South Korean automaker Hyundai is pumping $21 billion into the United States over the next four years.

The centerpiece of this investment is a brand-new steel plant in Louisiana, set to generate nearly 1,500 jobs—a move that’s already turning heads.

Trump welcomed Hyundai Chairman Euisun Chung, Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), and House Majority Leader Steve Scalise to the White House to share the news, spotlighting a partnership that promises to reshape American manufacturing.

The Louisiana facility marks Hyundai’s first U.S. steel mill, designed to churn out cutting-edge steel for electric vehicles (EVs) that will roll off the lines at two existing U.S. plants, according to CNBC.

It’s a strategic play to bolster domestic production, and Trump didn’t hesitate to tie it to his broader vision.

“This investment is a clear demonstration that tariffs very strongly work,” he said. “And I hope other things also, but the tariffs are bringing them in at levels that have not been witnessed.” The comment nods to a policy approach that’s starting to show tangible results.

Hyundai Doubles Down on America

For Hyundai, this isn’t just a small step—it’s a giant leap. Chairman Euisun Chung called the $21 billion commitment the company’s largest-ever U.S. investment, projecting it will create 14,000 jobs nationwide over four years, per Bloomberg. The goal? Ramp up production to 1.2 million vehicles annually, cementing Hyundai’s footprint in the American market.

“We are especially excited about Hyundai Steel’s multi-billion dollar investment in a new facility in Louisiana, which will create 1,300 American jobs and serve as the foundation for a more self-reliant and secure automotive supply chain in the U.S.,” Chung said, highlighting the ripple effects for workers and industry alike.

Hyundai’s already got a solid base here, with auto plants in Alabama and Georgia. Monday’s announcement added a third to the mix—a second Georgia facility—expanding its reach even further.

The timing aligns with Trump’s plan to roll out reciprocal tariffs on April 2, a date he’s dubbed “Liberation Day in America.” It’s a subtle but clear signal that the administration’s trade strategy is nudging global players to invest stateside, and Hyundai’s jumping on board.

A Trend Gains Momentum

This isn’t an isolated move. Hyundai’s hefty pledge follows a wave of similar commitments from foreign giants like Taiwan’s TSMC and Japan’s SoftBank, each pouring billions into U.S. manufacturing as Trump’s tariff plans loom.

The April 2 deadline seems to be lighting a fire under these companies, encouraging them to plant roots here rather than face steeper trade costs later. It’s a practical response to a policy that’s quietly reshaping the economic landscape.

For Louisiana, the steel plant is a game-changer—1,300 direct jobs plus a stronger supply chain for EVs that keeps more production on home soil. Across the country, the 14,000-job forecast offers a lifeline to workers and communities eager for opportunity.

Whether it’s tariffs or sheer business savvy driving Hyundai’s decision, the outcome’s the same: a major investment that’s putting America front and center, with more potentially on the horizon.

Donald Trump isn’t messing around. His life has been on the line too many times.

And now Trump ordered Secret Service to do the unthinkable.

Trump Trims Security for Mayorkas

President Trump has taken a firm step, ending Secret Service protection for former Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, a move the agency confirmed Monday evening.

Mayorkas, who shaped the Biden administration’s softer stance on illegal immigration, had been a frequent target of frustration for those pushing tougher border policies. Now, Trump’s decision signals a shift, cutting through what some see as lingering excess from the prior administration.

Initially, President Joe Biden had extended Mayorkas’ taxpayer-funded security detail for six months post-tenure, a cushion that would’ve lasted until mid-July. That plan unraveled this week when Trump stepped in, pulling the plug early.

It’s a practical move that aligns with a broader effort to rethink how resources are allocated—especially for figures tied to policies that didn’t sit well with many Americans.

A Clear Order Executed

The Secret Service didn’t hesitate to act. “Per executive memorandum of the President, the protective detail for former Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has been discontinued,” a spokesperson told The Post, keeping it concise.

They added, “To ensure the integrity of our operations, we cannot comment on the specifics of our protective means and methods,” a nod to efficiency over fanfare. The directive hit the agency’s desk last Friday, per the Washington Post, and by Monday, Trump was touting the change on Truth Social with a shared headline.

The White House didn’t respond to an email seeking clarification, but the action speaks for itself. It’s less about drama and more about delivering on a promise to streamline—a subtle but telling choice from a leader who’s never shied away from shaking things up when he sees fit.

Part of a Bigger Cleanup

Mayorkas isn’t alone in losing his security net. Just last week, Hunter and Ashley Biden, the former president’s adult kids, saw their details vanish, a quiet rollback of Biden-era perks.

Earlier this month, Anthony Fauci, the retired infectious disease chief, also had his Secret Service agents pulled—another pragmatic cut under Trump’s watch that keeps the focus on moving forward.

Even figures from Trump’s first term aren’t immune. He’s ended protection for ex-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and former National Security Adviser John Bolton, despite Iran’s threats against them.

It’s a bold call, trimming back what some might call unnecessary holdovers, even for allies who faced real risks. The consistency suggests a principle at play: security isn’t a lifetime entitlement.

A Leaner Approach Takes Shape

The timing of Mayorkas’ security loss—hot on the heels of other cuts—paints a picture of an administration serious about paring down.

For those who cheered Trump’s return, it’s a welcome sign of discipline, shedding costs tied to a past administration’s priorities. Critics might call it harsh, but the move fits a pattern of decisive action over sentimentality.

Without a detailed explanation beyond the Secret Service’s statement, the reasoning stays open-ended. Is it about saving money, sending a message, or both? Either way, Mayorkas now navigates life without the federal shield, joining others in a post-protection reality as Trump’s team keeps the momentum rolling.

Democrats are getting bolder. But this deserves jail time.

Because this Democrat Congresswoman’s ties to terrorism were exposed for all to see

House Republicans Demand FBI Probe into Tesla Attacks

A coalition of House Republicans, led by Rep. Andy Biggs of Arizona, took action on Friday, pressing FBI Director Kash Patel to launch an investigation into what they describe as domestic terrorism targeting Tesla owners and dealerships.

In a sharply worded letter co-signed by six GOP colleagues, they point fingers at the “radical Left” and specifically call out Texas Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett, suggesting her rhetoric may be fueling a wave of violent acts against the electric car company.

The lawmakers’ letter urges Patel to “open an inquiry into those who are fomenting, inciting and engaging in domestic terrorism, including recent calls to action by Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett.” They argue that Crockett “has joined those who are fomenting the violence by encouraging her followers to ‘take down’ Elon Musk and Tesla,” tying her comments to a broader pattern of attacks they see as crossing legal lines.

Alleged Crimes and a Legal Line in the Sand

The Republicans ground their case in the legal definition of domestic terrorism, which includes “acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, such as violence or threatening or intimidating.”

They also highlight actions meant to “intimidate or coerce a civilian population or to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion” as qualifying under the statute. To back their claims, they list recent incidents: eight Molotov cocktails hurled at a Tesla dealership in Oregon, an attempted arson of a Tesla vehicle in Colorado, and vandalism targeting a Tesla and charging stations in South Carolina.

“Of course, these despicable acts are growing in an organized way to intimidate ordinary citizens who simply own a car manufactured by Tesla,” the lawmakers assert. “Those behind this conspiracy of violence are now trying to dox Tesla owners and are encouraging vandalism and violence.” The letter, co-signed by Reps. Eli Crane (AZ), Eric Burlison (MO), Keith Self (TX), Clay Higgins (LA), Andy Ogles (TN), and Lauren Boebert (CO), paints a picture of escalating aggression they want the FBI to tackle head-on.

Crockett’s Call and a Clash of Interpretations

The spotlight turned to Rep. Jasmine Crockett after she posted a video Thursday aligning herself with the “Tesla Takedown” movement—a group billing itself as a “peaceful protest” pushing investors to ditch Tesla stock. In the video, the Texas Democrat, who serves on the House Department of Government Efficiency Subcommittee, didn’t mince words:

“On March 29 it’s my birthday. All I want to see happen on my birthday is for Elon to be taken down.” Yet she quickly clarified her intent, adding, “The things that we’re fighting for — we are fighting for our country, we are fighting for democracy, we’re fighting for our freedom — and when I say fighting, I am saying that figuratively. Obviously everything that I am promoting is nonviolent and so definitely don’t want anyone to take that word literal in any way.”

Republicans, however, aren’t buying the disclaimer. They contend she and others “encouraged these acts in order to intimidate the head of [the Department of Government Efficiency], Elon Musk, and influence the policies of the Trump Administration. These incitements appear to violate the law.”

They warn that what started as protest has “morphed into an organized effort to promote violence,” pressing Patel to investigate both the perpetrators and those they see as instigators.

Meanwhile, the Justice Department is already moving on related cases. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Thursday that three individuals accused of damaging Tesla property in Colorado, Oregon, and South Carolina face up to 20 years in prison on domestic terrorism charges.

“The days of committing crimes without consequence have ended,” Bondi stated. “Let this be a warning, If you join this wave of domestic terrorism against Tesla properties, the Department of Justice will put you behind bars.” The defendants allegedly used firearms and explosives, targeting assets tied to Musk’s company amid his high-profile role in the Trump administration.

President Trump weighed in Friday via social media, upping the stakes with a provocative suggestion: “I look forward to watching the sick terrorist thugs get 20-year jail sentences for what they are doing to Elon Musk and Tesla. Perhaps they could serve them in the prisons of El Salvador, which have become so recently famous for such lovely conditions!”

Donald Trump is winning left and right. Now this could be the nail in the coffin.

And Democrats are completely blindsided after Trump scored this major victory.

Trump Seals Massive UAE Investment Deal

President Donald Trump notched a major win this week, locking in a $1.4 trillion pledge from the United Arab Emirates to pour into American energy, manufacturing, and tech over the next ten years.

The deal, unveiled Friday by the White House, promises a hefty boost to the U.S. economy at a time when fresh capital could make all the difference.

“This new framework will substantially increase the UAE’s existing investments in the U.S. economy in AI infrastructure, semiconductors, energy, and American manufacturing,” the White House declared in a statement, as reported by Bloomberg.

The agreement didn’t just materialize out of thin air.

It stemmed from a high-stakes Tuesday Oval Office sit-down between Trump and UAE national security adviser Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed, followed by Vice President JD Vance and Cabinet heavyweights hashing out details over dinner with a UAE delegation.

That crew included top brass from the UAE’s sovereign wealth funds and major firms, according to a White House insider speaking to Reuters. The effort paid off, setting the stage for a decade-long economic partnership.

UAE Targets Key U.S. Sectors

Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed didn’t mince words about the UAE’s ambitions. “The UAE is committed to strengthening its economic ties with the U.S. by accelerating investments in artificial intelligence, advanced technology, infrastructure, energy, and healthcare,” he said. The framework’s specifics back that up.

Reuters reports that UAE investment fund ADQ teamed up with U.S.-based Energy Capital Partners for a $25 billion push into American energy infrastructure and data centers.

Meanwhile, XRG, the global arm of UAE state oil giant ADNOC, threw its weight behind U.S. natural gas, backing NextDecade’s liquefied natural gas export hub in Texas.

But that’s just the start. Companies in the talks are apparently eyeing even bigger plays, with plans to sink funds into U.S. gas, chemicals, and energy infrastructure beyond the initial framework.

It’s a bold move that could ripple through multiple industries, giving American workers and businesses a shot in the arm after years of watching opportunities slip overseas.

A Campaign Promise Comes to Life

Trump’s no stranger to touting foreign investment—he made it a cornerstone of his campaign, arguing it’s the key to reviving U.S. manufacturing and sparking tech-sector jobs.

This UAE deal feels like a victory lap for that vision, pulling in serious cash from abroad while Biden’s old crew was busy fumbling the ball. With the UAE stepping up, Trump’s team is banking on this infusion to prove that America’s still the place to invest—especially when the right leadership’s calling the shots.

The mainstream media is back at it again. But they’re getting stopped in their tracks.

Because this Trump official humiliated a reporter for asking the most idiotic question imaginable.

Hassett Fires Back on Egg Prices

Kevin Hassett, the National Economic Council Director, didn’t mince words on Thursday when he took a reporter to task outside the White House.

The confrontation erupted after a journalist dared to question whether egg prices were truly dropping, putting Hassett’s claims under the spotlight.

The sparks flew when the reporter probed for updates on a joint initiative with Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, aimed at tackling the egg crisis sparked by last year’s bird flu outbreak. Hassett didn’t hesitate. “Yeah, they’re down $2.50 a dozen,” he snapped.

“And I went to the grocery store, as I do every Saturday, because I’m the one who likes to shop at my family because I get to see all the prices. And the egg prices in D.C. were actually down quite a bit more than $2.50 a dozen.”

Linking Policy to Progress

Naturally, the follow-up came fast—how could he be sure the Trump administration deserved the credit? Hassett leaned in with confidence.

“Because if you look at the data on the culling of chickens, it’s basically stopped, starting on January 20th, there’s a chart we can show you on that,” he said, pointing to a sharp policy shift. He didn’t stop there, taking a swipe at the previous administration.

“But it’s astonishing how many chickens were killed in the last two months of the Biden administration,” he added, painting a grim picture of the past.

Hassett credited Rollins for the turnaround. “And by having a more prudent Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins, has done more prudent policy about how to manage the disease, then we got lower egg prices and healthier chickens, because it’s—they’re not being culled in millions,” he explained.

He drove the point home with hard numbers: “Remember, it was more than 100 million chickens were culled, and they spent $2 billion killing the chickens. And if you look at what’s happened to the culling since President Trump took office, it’s gone almost to zero.”

Facing the “Gotcha” Moment

The exchange took a turn when another reporter jumped in, aiming for a gotcha. “But what about the wholesale prices of eggs versus what consumers are actually paying?” they pressed.

“We’ve seen wholesale prices go down, but it’s not always reflected in the grocery stores.” Hassett didn’t flinch.

“For the latest egg prices, go to the grocery store,” he shot back, keeping it real. “Like I literally just went to the grocery and bought the same eggs I always buy, and they were way down.”

For Hassett, the proof’s in the shopping cart—not in press room debates. His no-nonsense take left the reporters scrambling, while he stood firm on the administration’s win against the egg crisis.

WATCH:

WATCH: National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett shames reporters on the price of eggs:

"Go to the grocery store”
pic.twitter.com/hsf3cUSvSO

— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) March 20, 2025

Trump is forging a big-tent coalition. And the Left doesn’t know how to counter it.

Now a high-profile Democrat betrayed her party to team up with Donald Trump.

Trump’s Unexpected Allies

Donald Trump’s stunning 2024 election triumph has left the chattering class scratching their heads, but one writer insists a hidden powerhouse bloc—often overlooked—propelled him to victory. Batya Ungar-Sargon, a columnist for The Free Press and author of Second Class: How the Elites Betrayed America’s Working Men and Women, counts herself among them.

Her viral sparring match with Bill Maher on last Friday’s Real Time on HBO lit up the internet when Maher, baffled, pegged her as a “conservative Republican.” “I was never a Republican or a conservative,” she shot back. “I was a leftist, and I’m still a leftist. I’m just a MAGA leftist now because—” Maher, cutting in, blurted, “That makes no sense.”

To Maher, the label was gibberish; to countless others, it rang true. “Since I was on Bill Maher, I have gotten thousands, and I mean thousands, of messages from people saying, ‘I am just like you. Thank you so much. That’s who I am. That’s what I am.’ And these are the people who gave President Trump his victory,” Ungar-Sargon told Fox News Digital.

“Because he wouldn’t have won if he only got people who had voted Republican in 2020, in 2016. He won because he convinced millions of people in swing states and across the country that he had their best interests at heart, many of them who had been Democrats. And I guess that’s who I speak for.”

The Rise of the MAGA Leftist

Ungar-Sargon’s “MAGA leftist” tag isn’t just a catchy soundbite. She roots it in “the labor left,” where the working class “is the backbone of any society, and their ability to achieve a middle-class standard of living is the defining feature of whether we will have a stable democracy or not.”

For her, that’s the heart of “left”—tied to anti-war stances, free speech zeal, and a vibe that’s “all, like, left stuff, and now it’s MAGA stuff.”

The indie journalist, also behind Bad News: How Woke Media Is Undermining Democracy, bristles at talk of a “political evolution.”

Her core views, she insists, haven’t budged much. But she cops to a past as a “woke leftist” with a bad case of “Trump Derangement Syndrome.”

“In 2015, I hated him. In 2016, when he won, I stopped going to my favorite bar, Wheeler’s, the local cop bar in Sheepshead Bay [in Brooklyn, New York], because everybody there had voted for him, and I felt that it was a personal betrayal,” she confessed, chuckling.

“Like I was one of those lefties. I really had the derangement bad, ok? I’m embarrassed to say. Of course, now I’m back at Wheeler’s more often than I should be, probably.”

Her wake-up call wasn’t Trump himself (though a pro-Trump Orthodox rabbi nudged her along).

It was a 2018 Yale study showing White liberals dumbed down their speech for people of color more than White conservatives did. “I remember when I read that I was so shook because I instantly recognized that it was true,” she recalled.

“And it was an indictment of not just my milieu, but my entire worldview, which I immediately could recognize was built on the same thing that makes White liberals behave in such a racist way, which was this idea that Blacks and Hispanics are beneath us and need our help. Like, it’s disgusting. But the entire progressive movement is really based on that idea.”

She stashed the study in a drawer, muttering, “I’m not ready to deal with the fallout here,” only to revisit it three months later, asking herself, “What does it mean you’re wrong about?”

From TDS to Trump’s Big Tent

The 2020 election was a coin toss—she voted Biden. But the COVID era, with its “lies” about the virus, brutal lockdowns, and vaccine mandates hammering the working class, soured her on the Democrats. Meanwhile, Trump was remolding the GOP.

“That is his genius, right? He looked at the Reagan party, which was socially conservative, free trade and foreign interventions and foreign wars. And he had the confidence to say, ‘That is not where the American people are at. They’re not socially conservative, they’re socially moderate. They support gay marriage, and they want there to be exceptions for abortion,’” she said.

“Can you imagine the confidence to not only take on the Democrats, but to destroy and rebuild the GOP? People say [it’s rebuilt] in his image, but it’s not in his image. It’s in the image of the American working class.”

Interviewing working-class folks for Second Class, she heard glowing takes on Trump’s first-term moves.

“People would make a very persuasive case to me about how his protectionist economic policies, specifically around trade and the border, had put money in their pockets and helped them become people who could aspire to the American dream once again after they had thought that that was really off the table for them,” she said. Trump, she realized, was a unifier for “normies,” not the elite’s boogeyman.

MAGA welcomed her with open arms. “I don’t agree with you about everything, but you are so welcome in this movement,” fans told her—unlike the left, where a sliver of dissent means exile.

In 2024, she voted Trump, a choice she stood by on Real Time. “I mean, you must have a feeling in your gut—look me in the eye and tell me you don’t—that this is really going badly, and I shouldn’t have thrown my lot in with this team,” Maher pressed. “Oh, no, I feel the opposite,” she fired back, unflinching.

There’s trouble at home for one major Democrat. And the press is going to have a field day with it.

Because her husband was arrested for committing this heinous crime.

A bombshell federal indictment out of Washington, D.C., accuses Cortney Merritts, the 46-year-old husband of former Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.), of swindling taxpayers out of over $20,000 through a slick COVID loan hustle—cash he allegedly squandered on “personal benefit and enjoyment,” according to the DC US Attorney’s Office.

Merritts faces two counts of wire fraud tied to shady applications he allegedly submitted to the Small Business Administration (SBA) in 2020 and 2021, pocketing—and never repaying—pandemic relief funds from the Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program (EIDL) and Paycheck Protection Program (PPP).

In July 2020, Merritts scored an $8,500 EIDL loan for his moving outfit, Vetted Couriers, after swearing to the SBA it had six employees and raked in $32,000 the prior year, the indictment claims.

But just a day later, he doubled down, applying again under the same program for a vague entity called “Courtney Merritts,” this time boasting ten employees and $53,000 in revenue.

The SBA sniffed out the scam, rejecting the second bid after noting the paperwork was “nearly identical” to his first.

The DC US Attorney’s Office, led by Ed Martin, alleges Merritts cooked the books on employee counts and revenues in those flopped applications.

Undeterred, he took another swing in April 2021, chasing a PPP loan for “Cortney Merritts.”

This time, he claimed the business launched in 2020 and pulled in $128,000 that year—more lies, prosecutors say. Unlike his earlier strikeout, this pitch landed, netting him a $20,832 PPP loan.

“Merritts used the proceeds for his personal benefit and enjoyment,” federal prosecutors assert, though they’re tight-lipped on what he splurged on.

“Based on Merritts’ alleged fraudulent representations, the SBA forgave the PPP loan in the amount of $20,832 and the $254.03 in interest,” the DC US Attorney’s Office noted.

Merritts’ attorney, Justin Gelfand, told the Washington Post his client’s ready to fight. “We look forward to litigating this case in the courtroom,” he said, signaling a not-guilty plea.

Cori Bush, the ex-“Squad” firebrand who lost her Missouri 1st District seat in 2024, isn’t implicated in her husband’s alleged scheme. Still, she’s no stranger to scrutiny.

In 2023, the Federal Election Commission and congressional ethics watchdogs flagged her for paying Merritts $60,000 from campaign funds in 2022 for security gigs—despite his lack of a license—cash that flowed before their February 2023 wedding, per the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT).

The “Defund the police” champion allegedly “used campaign funds for personal use,” the nonpartisan group charged.

Curiously, while Bush’s campaign was cutting checks to Merritts, it also shelled out over $225,000 to St. Louis’s PEACE Security and $50,000 to another guard, Nathaniel Davis, per FEC records.

Last year, the Justice Department reportedly probed Bush over her use of congressional and campaign funds for private security, though the investigation’s status remains murky, and she’s faced no charges.

Democrats should have some shame. But it appears they have anything but it.

And now Republicans uncovered a dark money network used for this disgusting purpose.

A startling new report from NGO Monitor, a Jerusalem-based watchdog, claims that several tax-exempt charities and financial service outfits in the U.S. are channeling funds to groups with ties to terrorist organizations like Hamas and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), as designated by the United States.

The exposé alleges that these terror-linked entities are raking in cash through 501(c)(3) organizations and donor-advised financial platforms right under the IRS’s nose. “The sharp rise in violent anti-Semitism in the wake of the October 7th massacre highlights the urgent need for greater vigilance in preventing the diversion of aid and NGO funding to terror and hate,” Professor Gerald M. Steinberg, NGO Monitor’s Founder and President, told The Daily Wire.

“This includes systematically investigating and documenting the support that IRS-registered charities receive from and provide to individuals and organizations linked to designated terror groups or active in spreading hate propaganda.”

NGO Monitor’s report names and shames several NGOs with alleged PFLP connections, flagged as terror groups by Israel: Union of Agricultural Work Committees (UAWC), Al-Haq, Defense for Children International-Palestine (DCI-P), and Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR). It also accuses Al Mezan of having members cozying up to both Hamas and the PFLP.

Take the Foundation for Middle East Peace (FMEP), a D.C.-based 501(c)(3)—its website brags about funding Al Haq, Al Mezan, DCI-P, and PCHR in 2025. While exact figures are murky, IRS filings from 2023 show FMEP dished out $10,000 to Al Mezan and a heftier $58,000 to Al-Haq.

Then there’s George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, which reportedly funneled $800,000 to Al Haq from 2020-2023, $250,000 to Al Haq Europe between 2023-2025, $170,000 to Al Mezan in 2023, and $450,000 to Al Mezan from 2021-2024.

Grassroots International, meanwhile, has been drumming up donations for PCHR, a group it calls a “long-term partner,” per NGO Monitor’s findings.

The report also spotlights other U.S. charities with tax-deductible status tossing money into the mix. The Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF) handed $100,000 to DCI-P for 2020-2022, while Cultures of Resistance Network has bankrolled Al-Haq, DCI-P, UAWC, and Al Mezan, according to NGO Monitor. A 2023 New York Post investigation found RBF poured millions since 2018 into six anti-Israel groups, some of which cheered Hamas’s October 7 civilian attack. RBF pushed back, insisting their “grantee organizations support, materially or ideologically, acts of terrorism” claims are baseless.

NGO Monitor also calls out Charities Aid Foundation in Alexandria, Virginia, for listing DCI-P in its “vetted network” of charities for donor-advised grants. The report further notes that Al-Haq and the Hind Rajab Foundation—whose founder brags about Hezbollah ties—rely on San Francisco’s Stripe Inc. to process donations.

The Belgium-based Hind Rajab Foundation has launched legal bids to nab IDF veterans, including Americans, and even demanded the arrests of former President Joe Biden and ex-Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

Its founder, Dyab Abou Jahjah, once boasted in 2003 that he “joined the Hezbollah resistance against Israel,” dubbed the 9/11 attacks “sweet revenge,” and reportedly sits on the U.S. no-fly list. A recent Jerusalem Post piece ties Jahjah’s family and business dealings to Hezbollah’s terror funding web.

Al Mezan’s director, Issam Younis, rubbed elbows with now-dead Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar at a 2017 panel, joined by heads of other U.S.-designated terror outfits like Palestinian Islamic Jihad and PFLP. NGO Monitor flags Al Mezan board member Nafiz Al-Madhoun, a former Hamas legislative bigwig from 2010-2022.

UAWC, dubbed the PFLP’s “agricultural arm” by a USAID audit, saw a 2022 Dutch audit uncover 34 individuals juggling roles in both UAWC and PFLP from 2007-2020. Two UAWC money men were nabbed in 2019 for heading a PFLP cell that bombed and killed a 17-year-old Israeli.

Israel’s Ministry of Defense slapped a terror label on Al-Haq in 2021 for acting as a PFLP front. Back in 2018, Visa, Mastercard, and American Express cut off its online donations over those ties, per NGO Monitor. Al-Haq’s director, Shawan Jabarin, has been pegged as a top PFLP figure by Israel’s Supreme Court and linked to multiple PFLP events, including that 2017 Sinwar sit-down.

PCHR’s founder, Raji Sourani, did three years in prison in 1979 for PFLP membership and was barred from the U.S. in 2012. In a 2014 Gaza speech, he said he was “proud” of the PFLP, where he “fought in its ranks.”

DCI-P earned its terror designation from Israel in 2021 for PFLP ties, losing funding from Citibank, Arab Bank PLC, and Global Giving. NGO Monitor says it’s stacked with PFLP-linked staff and board members.

Stripe, FMEP, Open Society Foundations, Grassroots International, RBF, and Cultures of Resistance didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

The Left is panicking. Their backs are against the wall and there’s no way out.

Now Trump secured a major victory that has silenced Democrats.

The Taliban has freed American hostage George Glezmann after more than two years in captivity, a breakthrough brokered through talks between the Trump administration and Qatari mediators, according to a diplomatic source speaking to Fox News Digital.

Glezmann’s release marks a rare moment of cooperation between Washington and Kabul, facilitated by Qatar’s pivotal role as a go-between.

A Journey Home Begins

On Wednesday evening local time, Glezmann, 65, boarded a flight from Kabul airport bound for Doha. There, he’ll link up with U.S. hostage envoy Adam Boehler and Qatari Foreign Ministry officials.

Kidnapped on December 5, 2022, while touring Kabul, his freedom came after Boehler held direct talks with Afghan foreign ministry officials, alongside Qatari counterparts.

The source described the release as a “goodwill gesture” from the Taliban, signaling “trust” in Qatar’s ongoing mediation between the U.S. and Afghanistan’s rulers.

Unlike the U.S., Qatar has kept diplomatic lines open with the Taliban since their 2021 takeover.

This latest exchange stands apart from earlier releases this year—like those of Americans Ryan Corbett and William Mckenty, swapped for a Taliban member in a last-minute Biden administration deal. Here, no such trade was reported, suggesting a shift in Taliban tactics or a nod to diplomatic goodwill.

Diplomatic Wins and Gratitude

Secretary of State Marco Rubio hailed the outcome, declaring, “George Glezmann is free. George was wrongfully detained in Afghanistan for two and a half years, but now he’s on his way to be reunited with his wife Aleksandra. Welcome home, George!” Glezmann’s wife, Aleksandra, expressed deep relief and praised the Trump team’s relentless push. “I can’t wait to see George and help him on his road to recovery as we rebuild our lives,” she said.

“Since the first day of the Trump administration his team has focused on securing George’s safe release. The skill and dedication demonstrated by Secretary Rubio, Mr. Waltz, and Mr. Boehler has been refreshing. It is clear to us that their dedication to the American people is unwavering.”

The Trump administration has put hostage rescues front and center, pairing that mission with efforts to thaw ties with adversarial nations.

Glezmann’s release underscores that focus, though questions linger about broader U.S.-Taliban relations.

Boehler’s Afghan meetings hint at possible warming, but with no formal U.S. recognition of the Taliban government, the path ahead remains murky.

One American Still in Limbo

Another U.S. citizen, Mahmood Habibi, remains in Taliban hands after over two years, though the group denies holding him. Whether Glezmann’s release paves the way for Habibi’s freedom—or signals a new chapter in U.S.-Afghan dealings—is unclear.

For now, the Trump administration’s diplomatic sprint has brought one American home, with eyes still fixed on others left behind.

Trump isn’t waiting for things to change. He’s bringing down the hammer now.

And the Federal Reserve is reeling after Trump made a game-changing announcement.

President Trump is nudging the Federal Reserve to slash interest rates sooner rather than later, aiming to smooth the rollout of his ambitious tariff strategy on imported goods.

With the economy in flux, he’s making his case loud and clear, turning to Truth Social to rally support for his vision.

A Call for Rate Cuts

Late Wednesday, Trump fired off a post urging the Fed to act decisively. “The Fed would be MUCH better off CUTTING RATES as U.S. Tariffs start to transition (ease!) their way into the economy. Do the right thing.

April 2nd is Liberation Day in America!!!” he wrote. The push comes as he gears up to unveil a tariff system by April 2, designed to mirror trade barriers other nations place on U.S. products—a move he’s dubbed a game-changer for American prosperity.

Wall Street, however, is jittery, eyeing the potential ripple effects. While Trump sees lower rates as a cushion for his tariff plan, some warn the combo could stoke inflation.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell, speaking Tuesday, kept rates steady but hinted at cuts possibly by June.

“We’re going to have to see how things actually work out,” Powell said, acknowledging tariffs might spark short-term price hikes before settling down, though he stressed the uncertainty ahead.

Tariffs and Economic Crossroads

Trump’s blueprint involves sizing up each country’s trade policies toward the U.S. and slapping corresponding tariffs on their goods. Some nations might talk their way to lighter levies, but he’s unwavering on the timeline.

It’s not his first tariff rodeo—during his prior term, he tacked a 20% tariff on Chinese imports and 25% on steel and aluminum. This time, he’s betting on a broader approach to level the playing field, with rate cuts as the economic lubricant.

Unlike his first stint in office, when he routinely blasted the Fed for hiking rates, Trump has kept relatively quiet on the central bank this year—until now. His overnight post marks a shift, signaling he’s ready to lean on the Fed to align with his agenda.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt backed him up Thursday, saying, “He’s made it very clear that he believes lower interest rates are going to help this country boom, and this administration is working on lowering the rate of inflation caused by the previous administration. Every day, inflation is cooling.”

Balancing Act Ahead

Leavitt added a populist twist: “The president strongly believes in low interest rates, and I think the American public do, too.” She defended Trump’s “every right” to weigh in on the Fed’s moves, framing it as part of his mission to juice the economy.

Powell’s cautious outlook contrasts with Trump’s urgency, setting up a tension between the White House’s bold strokes and the Fed’s wait-and-see stance. As April 2 looms—Trump’s self-proclaimed “Liberation Day”—the interplay of tariffs, rates, and inflation promises to keep the economic spotlight burning bright.

Peace through strength is back. And America’s enemies are on their heels.

Now the White House deployed an American warship for a truly stunning reason.

A Bold Move for Border Security

President Donald Trump’s choice to dispatch a Navy warship to bolster security along the southern border is a clear signal of strength, aimed at discouraging anyone eyeing a sea route into the U.S., according to one expert.

The USS Gravely, an Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer, is now steaming toward the Gulf of America under Trump’s executive order, a move the Navy confirmed in a statement Saturday.

“It’s unusual, normally you see land forces, but it’s still smart,” said Alfonso Aguilar, former chief of the U.S. Office of Citizenship and director of Hispanic engagement at the American Principles Project, in an interview with Fox News Digital.

Aguilar sees this as a savvy extension of Trump’s border strategy, projecting power where it’s needed most.

Strengthening Sovereignty at Sea

The USS Gravely, which set sail from Naval Weapons Station Yorktown, Virginia, is tasked with patrolling the Gulf to intercept drug smugglers and curb illegal maritime crossings.

“Gravely’s sea-going capacity improves our ability to protect the United States’ territorial integrity, sovereignty, and security,” said Gen. Gregory Guillot of U.S. Northern Command, which oversees military efforts at the border.

Navy officials echoed this, highlighting the warship’s role in tackling “maritime-related terrorism, weapons proliferation, transnational crime, piracy, environmental destruction, and illegal seaborne immigration.”

Pentagon chief spokesperson Sean Parnell reinforced the mission’s importance on Monday, telling reporters, “It’s not only vital for the United States to have control of our border via land. It’s equally important to control our territorial waters, and this deployment directly supports U.S. Northern Command’s mission to protect our sovereignty.”

The Navy’s involvement, officials added, will “fill critical capabilities gaps” for the Department of Homeland Security, amplifying efforts to secure America’s maritime frontier.

A Strategic Show of Force

Aguilar praised the deployment as a natural progression of the military’s border role, which has already made strides on land. “It’s what the military calls force projection,” he said. “It’s a great way to dissuade those who want to try to come to the U.S. through the sea … it’s a show of force.” He argued that the USS Gravely will bolster the U.S. Coast Guard’s operations, covering more water and sending an unmistakable message to those seeking sea-based alternatives to land crossings.

“Like the forces on land that are providing a supportive balance role to the Border Patrol … the Navy will be doing the same thing, providing support to the Coast Guard in doing interdiction and enforcing … immigration activities on the high seas,” Aguilar explained.

He also tied the timing to Trump’s broader success in reducing border crossings.

“The numbers have gone down, even the number of people trying [to cross the border] by sea, but it’s still a route,” he said. “What we have seen is that every time we close the door, they try to find another way to get in. So we have to close our land border, but we also have to close those sea entries to the U.S.” For Aguilar, this naval move underscores a comprehensive, no-nonsense approach to safeguarding the nation.

Trump isn’t taking any nonsense. All of his appointments have been instructed to do the same.

Now the White House Press Secretary ended this politician’s career with these two words.

A Fiery Retort from the White House

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt didn’t mince words Monday when she clapped back at a French lawmaker’s suggestion that France should reclaim the Statue of Liberty from the U.S. over the Trump administration’s immigration policies.

During the daily press briefing, Leavitt took a bold swing, delivering a history lesson with bite.

“My advice to that unnamed low-level French politician would be to remind them that it’s only because of the United States of America that the French are not speaking German right now,” she declared.

“So they should be very grateful to our great country.”

The room filled with audible gasps from reporters, stunned by her pointed World War II reference.

The French Provocation

The drama kicked off with Raphaël Glucksmann, a left-wing French politician, who aired his grievances in an interview with Le Monde.

He argued that France should take back the Statue of Liberty—the iconic gift his country gave to the U.S.—now standing tall on New York City’s Liberty Island.

“We’re going to say to the Americans who have chosen to side with the tyrants, to the Americans who fired researchers for demanding scientific freedom: ‘Give us back the Statue of Liberty,’” Glucksmann told the outlet.

He doubled down at a convention of his left-leaning party, Place Publique, adding, “We gave it to you as a gift, but apparently you despise it. So it will be just fine here at home.” His words sparked a transatlantic spat, but not everyone’s buying his grand gesture.

A Monument Rooted in History

Glucksmann’s call might stir headlines, but UNESCO—the United Nations’ cultural arm, which lists the statue as a World Heritage treasure—makes it clear: the Statue of Liberty is U.S. government property.

It’s not going anywhere. Originally, the monument was a powerful symbol of friendship between France and America, dreamed up to mark the 100th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.

That vision hit roadblocks, though. The Franco-Prussian War erupted in 1870, sidelining its designer, French sculptor Frédéric-Auguste Bartholdi, as conflict consumed his homeland. Funding was another hurdle: France agreed to bankroll the statue itself, while Americans footed the bill for its pedestal.

Shipped in 350 pieces across the Atlantic, the Statue of Liberty was finally unveiled on October 28, 1886—a testament to resilience and alliance that’s now at the center of this latest diplomatic dust-up.