Home Blog

Donald Trump’s top enemy makes a wild confession about him


Former President Trump’s fortunes have been crazy lately. It’s only getting crazier.

And now Donald Trump’s top enemy has made an utterly wild confession about him.

CNN Reluctantly Admits Trump’s Political Fortunes Soar Amid Assassination Attempt and Legal Victories

CNN has for years been one of the harshest critics of Donald Trump. They spent the entirety of his first term in office to make him out to be a pariah who deserves everything bad happening to him that one could possibly think up.

Yet, in a remarkable turn of events, former President Donald Trump’s political standing has reached new heights following a failed assassination attempt and significant legal victories. During a CNN panel discussion on Monday, the “Inside Politics With Dana Bash” team analyzed Trump’s resilience and his burgeoning support within the Republican Party.

Trump survived an assassination attempt at his rally on Saturday, and on Monday, Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed his classified documents case. The panel highlighted that the Republican National Convention is commencing at a time when Trump’s influence is at its zenith.

David Chalian, CNN’s political director, commented, “We find ourselves at the opening of this convention where Donald Trump is going to, for the third consecutive presidential cycle, be named his party’s standard bearer. In this moment of having just survived an assassination attempt and now being totally vindicated by a district-level judge in one of his key arguments, one of the two federal cases against him now thrown out, it’ll go on appeal. Obviously, Judge Cannon has been offering opinions that have been quite favorable to Donald Trump, who appointed her to the district court. And I imagine she may be on a shortlist for other appointments should he become president.”

Chalian added, “You can’t paint a better picture for Donald Trump to walk into this environment, given that he is okay from the attack. It will be a hero’s welcome on this convention floor like we’ve never seen for a nominee before.”

Authorities have identified 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks as the gunman. Crooks’ shot grazed Trump’s ear, drawing blood but not causing serious injury.

CNN senior political analyst Nia-Malika Henderson remarked, “He couldn’t have scripted it any better. Donald Trump has been a lucky politician in so many ways. Here he is on the cusp of being nominated, and you can feel the electricity around Milwaukee. The delegates really worship this president. He is at his apex, and we’re going to see some of that tonight. Obviously, he‘s going to roll out the VP at some point, but the star of this show is going to be Donald Trump, and these stories just add to it.”

Judge Cannon’s dismissal of the classified documents case was based on the assertion that special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment was unlawful, writing that it violated the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution.

CNN’s chief national affairs correspondent Jeff Zeleny noted, “I am struck by how different this moment is for Donald Trump. As David was saying, it’s his third convention being nominated, but it’s different in every way. He owns this Republican Party. We’ve known that, but what I’m watching for as the day goes on, and I think this ruling provides a pathway to that, is can he pivot and sort of win over some voters who may not be with him necessarily, who may be still uneasy about him?”

Zeleny continued, “We know that his base supports him tremendously, but think that decision to invite Nikki Haley to give a speech on Tuesday night is a big signal because Nikki Haley was winning those primary voters, many of them right here in Wisconsin… We will see if the Trump orbit keeps this unity theme alive. That‘s a big challenge for them, but this is a new opportunity for him as well.”

Earlier on Monday, CNN political commentator Paul Begala acknowledged his personal dislike for Trump but admitted that Trump now has the “opportunity” to become “sympathetic” following the assassination attempt.

CNN’s Chief Congressional Correspondent Manu Raju concluded, “We are seeing Trump at the height of his political power, probably really a high point in his political career since he came onto the public sphere. It‘s hard to think of a different time. This Republican Party is absolutely united behind him like we have not seen.”

As the convention unfolds, all eyes are on Trump, whose political narrative continues to defy expectations and captivate the nation.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more updates on Donald Trump and the 2024 election.

Secret Service exposes who failed Donald Trump during wild assassination attempt


The blame game has already started. No one wants to take responsibility.

And now Secret Service exposed who failed Donald Trump during his wild assassination attempt.

The Secret Service blamed local police for not securing the rooftop from which gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks attempted to assassinate former President Donald Trump, insisting it was outside the federal agency’s protective perimeter.

Instead, securing and patrolling the factory grounds of AGR International Inc.—located about 130 yards from the stage where Trump was speaking Saturday—was the responsibility of local Pennsylvania police, according to Secret Service representative Anthony Gugliemi, as reported by the New York Times.

The Secret Service was only tasked with covering the rally grounds, with local police recruited to assist with those efforts and secure the area outside the rally.

However, neighbors near Butler Farm Show Grounds told The Post they were never visited by any law enforcement agencies—local or federal—in the days before or during the rally.

“Nobody contacted me. Nobody. Nobody called me, nobody stopped here,” said Valerie Fennell, whose home backs up to the fairgrounds and is just beyond a stand of trees from AGR.

“I kinda was thinking that as close as my house is, that I honestly thought this might be part of a command station at some point,” she added.

And it wasn’t just Fennell who wasn’t contacted by law enforcement—her entire neighborhood was left alone despite their proximity to the rally grounds.

“I was talking to my neighbors yesterday, and none of them had gotten a call. Or anything,” she said, while her sister, Debra, agreed.

“I guess it’s kind of the same question that everybody has. I guess, as far as like, why that area wasn’t secure.”

The lapses continued into the rally itself.

Crooks was reportedly seen with a rifle outside a security checkpoint to gain entrance into the rally and was later spotted jumping “roof to roof” before settling on the AGR factory.

Police failed to locate him while those alerts were out, finally responding to reports of an armed man on top of the AGR roof.

Around 6:10 p.m., a local police officer climbed a ladder onto the roof and came face to face with Crooks, who was pointing his rifle at him, law enforcement sources told the Associated Press.

The officer backed down the ladder, and in those moments, Crooks took aim and fired about eight bullets at the rally. He struck Trump in the ear, fatally struck bystander Corey Comperatore in the audience, and gravely wounded two others in the crowd.

Within moments, Secret Service snipers stationed on a barn rooftop behind the stage fatally shot Crooks. Snipers appeared to have their sights trained in Crooks’ direction before they opened fire, though it is unclear whether they had seen him.

The Secret Service confirmed it relied on local law enforcement to help run security at the event, telling the Washington Post it is common practice to depend on local agencies for support.

In addition to leaving the grounds outside the rally perimeter under the purview of local police, at least six officers from Butler County tactical units filled out the Secret Service’s counter-assault team—the heavily armed agents who covered Trump’s evacuation—which only included two members of the Secret Service itself.

The Secret Service’s two sniper teams were backed up by two local sniper teams.

Pennsylvania police confirmed they assisted the Secret Service and regularly do so when high-profile government officials come to town, but that the federal agency ultimately runs the show.

“Secret Service always has the lead on securing something like this,” Lt. Col. George Bivens of the Pennsylvania State Police told reporters.

“We work with them to provide whatever is requested by the Secret Service, but they’re the lead in that security,” he said.

Calls for an investigation into the Secret Service and what allowed Crooks to come within millimeters of assassinating Trump have begun, with House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) announcing plans to summon agency director Kimberly Cheatle for a July 22 hearing.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Stunning new report emerge that terrify Biden and the entire Democrat party


The Radical Left is suffering majorly under the current leadership. But even they didn’t think things would get this bad.

And a stunning new report have emerged that terrify Biden and the entire Democrat party.

In a striking revelation that challenges long-held assumptions about the political leanings of America’s youth, a new poll from the Pew Research Center indicates that young people are increasingly aligning with the Republican Party.

The National Public Opinion Reference Survey, published on Tuesday, shows that for Americans under 30, the GOP is now the party of choice. This comes as a significant shift after decades of perceived leftist indoctrination in schools, entertainment, and politics.

The survey, conducted from February 1 to June 10, gathered responses from 5,626 American adults. According to the results, 47 percent of respondents identified as Republican or leaned towards the GOP, while 46 percent favored the Democratic Party. This narrow but notable preference for the GOP among young voters represents a departure from the trend observed over recent decades.

Pew’s analysis highlights that the Democratic Party has lost the edge it maintained from 2017 to 2021. “In recent decades, neither party has had a sizable advantage, but the Democratic Party has lost the edge it maintained from 2017 to 2021,” Pew noted.

This decline is particularly pronounced among black voters, where “17% of Black voters under 50 identify as or lean Republican, compared with just 7% of Black voters 50 and older.”

Nate Cohn, Chief Political Analyst of The New York Times, emphasized the significance of these findings. He noted that the poll is “important because it’s used as a ‘benchmark’ — its results are used as targets for weighting by other polls.”

Cohn pointed out that “by subgroup, the headline is age: NPORS found the GOP ahead on leaned party ID among 18 to 29-year-olds, even though the sample was Biden+20 on 2020 recall vote. The sample size is fairly large (n=496) and it hasn’t shown anything like this in previous cycles.”

Harvard professor and political scientist Matt Blackwell added to the conversation by highlighting an unusual detail from the Pew NPORS: “Respondents under 26 that are registered to vote are almost R +30.” This substantial shift suggests that young voters are not only moving towards the GOP but are doing so in significant numbers.

This trend is not entirely new. Earlier this year, various indicators suggested that younger Americans were beginning to lean further right. However, the Pew Research Center’s findings carry additional weight because of the organization’s reputation for accuracy and reliability. Even outlets typically associated with liberal viewpoints, such as NPR and The New York Times, recognize the credibility of Pew’s data.

In May, several polls indicated a growing preference for Trump over Biden among young Americans. The Washington Post and NPR both reported on this phenomenon, attempting to alert the Democratic Party to the potential implications.

The Washington Post’s Ruy Teixeira warned, “Discontent among young voters might deny Democrats what they need to hold the White House and Senate.” He noted that ongoing campus demonstrations and growing dissatisfaction with Biden’s administration were contributing to this shift.

Teixeira referenced a Gallup poll that found “8-to-29-year-olds today (most of whom are considered Gen Z) are plurality, but not majority, Democratic.” This poll also noted that the “plus-8 advantage is the narrowest Democratic tilt among this age group since 2005 and continues a downward trend since 2019, when the Democratic advantage among this age group was 23 points.”

An NPR headline from the same period bluntly stated: “Biden’s problems with younger voters are glaring, poll finds.” The report detailed that in a head-to-head matchup with Trump, Biden was only narrowly ahead, with a statistical tie of 50-48 percent. Biden led by just 4 points among voters under 45 and by 6 points with Gen Z/Millennials.

As President Biden’s approval ratings continue to wane, these numbers are likely to worsen. The incumbent president’s apparent decline has left many young voters disillusioned, prompting them to seek alternatives. For many, Trump represents a beacon of hope with his vision of an American future that emphasizes prosperity and security.

This shift towards the GOP among young voters has significant implications for the future of American politics. Historically, younger generations have tended to lean left, influenced by progressive ideals promoted in educational institutions and popular culture. However, this new data suggests a growing discontent with the status quo and a desire for change.

Several factors may be contributing to this trend. Firstly, many young Americans are feeling the economic pinch, with concerns about job prospects, student loan debt, and housing affordability. The GOP’s message of economic opportunity and deregulation resonates with those seeking financial stability and independence.

Additionally, the perceived erosion of traditional values and national identity under progressive policies has prompted some young voters to gravitate towards the conservative platform, which emphasizes patriotism, personal responsibility, and law and order.

The Republican Party has also made concerted efforts to engage with younger voters through social media and digital campaigns, effectively countering the dominant left-leaning narratives.

By addressing issues that matter to young people, such as freedom of speech, digital privacy, and entrepreneurship, the GOP is gradually winning their support.

As the 2024 election approaches, this shift among young voters could play a pivotal role in determining the outcome. For the Democratic Party, the challenge will be to reconnect with this crucial demographic, addressing their concerns and offering tangible solutions. Meanwhile, the Republican Party must continue to build on this momentum, ensuring that their message resonates and translates into voter turnout.

In conclusion, the latest Pew Research Center poll indicates a significant and potentially transformative shift in the political landscape. Young Americans are increasingly aligning with the Republican Party, challenging long-standing assumptions about their political preferences. As both parties navigate this changing terrain, the voices and votes of young people will undoubtedly shape the future of American politics.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

Liberal leader completely loses her mind in public address and even Democrats are embarrassed


Radical Liberals are known for some unhinged rants. But not many come close to how strange this was.

And a liberal leader completely loses her mind in a public address and even Democrats are embarrassed.

In a spectacle that some are calling unhinged and others are hailing as passionate, National Education Association (NEA) President Becky Pringle delivered a fiery keynote address at the union’s annual convention.

The largest teachers’ union in the United States convened with nearly 7,000 delegates in attendance, and Pringle’s performance has ignited a firestorm of reactions from across the political spectrum.

Pringle’s address was marked by a series of impassioned outbursts and dramatic gestures that included wailing, flailing her hands, and repeatedly pounding the podium. Her rallying cry, “We must win all the things,” was delivered with a fervor that left many in the audience cheering, while others were left bewildered by the apparent lack of specific substance behind the slogan.

“We are the ones who hold steadfast to the belief of the plausibility of the possible,” Pringle declared, in a phrase that some critics have labeled as vacuous rhetoric. “We are the heirs of all who did this work before us. We must keep doing! NEA delegates: we can do this work. We must do this. We get to do this work. We will do this work, because our students are depending on us!”

Pringle’s call to “win all the things” was repeated multiple times, creating a chorus that reverberated through the convention hall.

“To win all the things! NEA we have to win all the things! All the things! All the things! Our colleagues are depending on us to win all the things! Keep going NEA, to preserve our democracy, we must win all the things! Delegates, we won’t go back! We will keep going forward! Because we are the NEA! We are the NEA! We are the NEA and that’s what we do. Thank you NEA, thank you I love you.”

But what exactly are “all the things”? Pringle’s address, while high on emotion, left many questioning the concrete objectives and strategies behind the union’s ambitious rallying cry.

In her keynote, Pringle did touch upon specific issues, criticizing the Supreme Court for rendering decisions that she believes “attack, diminish, and disregard the needs and lived experiences of far too many Americans.”

She called for a strengthened public education system “designed around the joy of teaching; a system with a deep sense of community and shared responsibility; a system where high expectations are matched with plentiful resources and supports.”

Pringle’s vehement opposition to privatization, vouchers, and any schemes that could drain resources from public schools was a recurring theme.

“Every day, we will demand that every school consistently has the equitable funding and the resources they need so that every student in every community has the support and opportunities they need to take their rightful places in the world,” she proclaimed.

Furthermore, Pringle praised historical activists like Harvey Milk, asserting that the NEA continues their work. This, she argued, necessitates the re-election of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, whom she described as “pro-childcare; pro-diversity, equity, and inclusion; pro-universal meals; pro-voting rights; pro-schools free of gun violence; pro-racial and social justice friends who have been the strongest champions of public education, of educators, and of the labor movement in the history of our nation.”

While Pringle’s address was certainly impassioned, it has also drawn criticism for its lack of clarity and specificity. The repeated calls to “win all the things” have been viewed by some as emblematic of a broader issue within the NEA and similar organizations—a tendency to prioritize grandiose rhetoric over actionable solutions.

From a conservative perspective, Pringle’s speech underscores the increasing radicalization within the NEA and the broader teachers’ union movement. Her alignment with far-left political figures and causes, as well as her vehement opposition to school choice and privatization, reflect a commitment to maintaining the status quo in public education—a system that many conservatives argue is failing students and parents alike.

The call to strengthen public education through increased funding and resources is a familiar refrain from the NEA, yet critics argue that throwing more money at the problem has not historically led to better outcomes. Instead, they advocate for policies that introduce competition and accountability into the education system, such as school choice initiatives, charter schools, and voucher programs.

Moreover, Pringle’s praise for activists like Harvey Milk and her alignment with the Biden administration’s agenda raise concerns about the politicization of education. Many conservatives believe that schools should focus on core academic subjects and skills rather than serving as arenas for social and political activism.

The NEA’s stance against privatization and school choice is seen by some as an attempt to preserve the union’s power and influence rather than prioritizing the best interests of students. By opposing alternatives to traditional public schools, critics argue, the NEA is denying families the opportunity to choose the best educational environment for their children.

In conclusion, Becky Pringle’s address at the NEA convention was a vivid display of the passion and commitment that characterize the union’s leadership. However, from a conservative viewpoint, her rhetoric falls short of addressing the real issues facing American education today.

The call to “win all the things” may resonate with some, but without clear, actionable solutions, it risks becoming just another empty slogan in the ongoing debate over the future of education in the United States.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Karine Jean-Pierre betrays Biden in front of the whole nation


Joe Biden’s list of allies is short. And now even the closest ones are exposing him.

And now, Karine Jean-Pierre has betrayed Biden in front of the whole nation.

In a recent White House press briefing, Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre found herself in a unique position when asked about President Joe Biden’s capability to respond to a late-night crisis, particularly an incoming nuclear warhead.

The inquiry, posed by Fox News reporter Peter Doocy, highlighted growing concerns about Biden’s mental acuity and ability to effectively serve as Commander-in-Chief during critical moments.

During the press conference, Doocy referenced a statement made by President Biden claiming he is “sharpest before 8 p.m.,” a remark that has sparked debate about his ability to handle late-night emergencies.

Doocy’s pointed question about who would be responsible for alerting the President in the event of a late-night nuclear threat was met with a vague response from Jean-Pierre.

“He has a team that, uh, lets him know of any, of any, news that is pertinent and important to the American people,” Jean-Pierre stated. “He has someone or, uh, that is decided on with obviously with his national security council on who gets to tell him that news.”

This evasive answer failed to provide reassurance about Biden’s immediate availability during potential crises, fueling speculation about his readiness and mental fitness for the demands of the presidency.

The question of President Biden’s mental fitness has been a persistent issue, particularly in light of his performance in a recent debate against former President Donald Trump.

Critics from both sides of the political spectrum have raised alarms, with some members of his own party calling for him to reconsider running for re-election.

The debate performance was widely regarded as a “disastrous” showing for Biden, further intensifying scrutiny over his cognitive abilities. Observers noted frequent gaffes, moments of confusion, and an overall lack of sharpness that contrasted starkly with Trump’s more forceful and coherent presentation.

Adding to the concerns is the role of First Lady Jill Biden in the administration. Reports have surfaced that she frequently attends meetings with the President, leading to questions about her influence on decision-making processes.

When asked directly whether Jill Biden makes decisions or advises the President during these meetings, Jean-Pierre sidestepped the question, merely asserting that the President makes the decisions.

The involvement of a first lady in such a capacity is unprecedented and raises questions about the extent of her influence. While it is not uncommon for first ladies to be involved in certain advisory roles, the level of involvement suggested by these reports is unusual and potentially problematic, especially if it reflects a compensatory measure for the President’s cognitive decline.

Further complicating matters are allegations that Hunter Biden, the President’s son and a convicted felon, is attending official White House meetings. This revelation has drawn significant criticism and concerns over potential conflicts of interest and the appropriateness of his involvement in government affairs.

Jean-Pierre, when pressed on this issue, chose not to provide a substantive response, stating, “Look, I can’t, I’m, I’m certainly not going to get into private conversations that, that occur.” This non-answer does little to alleviate concerns about the influence of Hunter Biden within the administration and the potential implications for governance and ethical standards.

The implications of these concerns are far-reaching. As the 2024 presidential election approaches, questions about Biden’s mental fitness and the influence of unelected individuals on his decision-making process could become significant points of contention.

Republicans are likely to seize upon these issues as evidence of the need for new leadership, while Democrats may face internal divisions over whether to support Biden’s re-election bid.

Moreover, the potential national security risks associated with a President who may not be fully capable of responding to late-night emergencies cannot be understated. The Commander-in-Chief’s ability to make rapid, informed decisions in the face of crises is paramount to the safety and security of the nation. Any doubt about this capability undermines confidence in the administration and could have serious consequences on both domestic and international fronts.

The recent press briefing by Karine Jean-Pierre has done little to dispel the growing concerns about President Joe Biden’s mental fitness and readiness to handle the rigorous demands of the presidency. The evasive responses regarding his ability to respond to a late-night nuclear threat, the involvement of Jill Biden in official meetings, and the presence of Hunter Biden in the White House all contribute to a troubling narrative.

As these issues continue to unfold, it is crucial for the administration to provide clear and transparent answers to the American public. The stakes are too high for ambiguity and uncertainty. The nation deserves to know that its President is fully capable of leading effectively and safeguarding its interests at all times.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Liberals’ horrific attempts to take advantage of minors have rocked the nation to its core


The Radical Left are always trying to do terrible things. But this latest problem is disgusting.

And Liberals’ horrific attempts to take advantage of minors have rocked the nation to its core.

California’s Senate Bill 1414, which aims to increase penalties for those who solicit, agree to engage in, or engage in commercial s*x with minors, has sparked a contentious debate.

While the bill seeks to protect vulnerable children from exploitation, it has faced significant opposition from radical groups who claim that it could disproportionately harm minorities and the LGBTQ community.

However, these criticisms are terrifying and misguided and fail to recognize the paramount importance of safeguarding our youth.

Originally proposed by State Senator Shannon Grove, SB 1414 intended to make it a felony to solicit s*x from minors under the age of 18. Grove’s aim was clear: to send a strong message that the exploitation of minors in any form would not be tolerated.

The bill’s supporters argue that increasing penalties would act as a deterrent and provide a more robust legal framework to protect children from heinous crimes.

During public testimony, a coalition of activists voiced opposition to the bill, claiming that SB 1414 takes an overly punitive approach that fails to address the root causes of s*xual exploitation.

They are particularly concerned about the impact on marginalized communities, including members of the LGBTQ community.

“We are particularly concerned that the harsher penalties proposed in this bill will disproportionately impact marginalized communities, especially members of the LGBTQ community who already suffer from systematic biases within the criminal justice system, particularly when it comes to s*xually based offenses,” the activists stated.

These arguments, however, seem to overlook the bill’s core objective: to protect minors from s*xual predators. The focus should be on preventing exploitation, not on diluting the penalties to accommodate broader social concerns.

The claim that harsher penalties will disproportionately impact certain communities fails to address the fundamental issue of protecting vulnerable children.

The bill passed a vote in the Public Safety Committee last week, but not without significant amendments. Initially, the committee watered down the bill to exclude 16- and 17-year-olds from its provisions, limiting its scope to those 15 and younger.

However, following intense debate and public pressure, the committee later revised the bill to include 16- and 17-year-olds, with a crucial caveat: prosecutors must now prove that the minors were not only solicited for s*x but also victims of s*x trafficking.

Senator Grove expressed frustration over the amendments, accusing her colleagues of political showmanship. “I think Kevin McCarty is looking for a way to put 16- and 17-year-olds back in the bill and say he was successful, but he only damaged them further,” Grove told KCRA 3.

She believes that the changes undermine the bill’s original intent and create additional hurdles for prosecutors, potentially allowing offenders to escape justice.

The debate over SB 1414 highlights the broader challenge of balancing the need for strict legal measures to protect children with concerns about equity and justice within the criminal justice system.

Proponents of the bill argue that tougher penalties are necessary to combat the serious crime of child exploitation. They believe that by increasing the consequences for those who prey on minors, society can better protect its most vulnerable members.

Activists’ claims that the bill will lead to higher rates of incarceration among marginalized communities without effectively reducing the incidence of these crimes are speculative at best.

The focus must remain on the victims—the children who are being exploited and trafficked. By opposing SB 1414, these activists inadvertently align themselves with the interests of those who would harm minors.

The paramount objective must remain clear: protecting children from s*xual exploitation. As California’s lawmakers grapple with these challenges, the outcome of this bill will likely set a precedent for how similar issues are addressed in the future.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Biden suffers health crisis while meeting with world leaders and exposes the US to danger


Biden’s health problems don’t just only affect his life. They affect the safety of our country.

And now, Biden has suffered a health crisis while meeting with world leaders and exposed the US to danger.

In a startling revelation, it has been reported that President Joe Biden skipped a crucial meeting with world leaders shortly after the war in Ukraine erupted.

The meeting, intentionally scheduled for the early evening to accommodate the President’s routine, was missed by Biden as he reportedly needed to “go to bed.” This incident has sparked serious concerns about the President’s capability to handle crises beyond his limited working schedule, which reportedly spans from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. and includes naps.

The Wall Street Journal reported that German officials had sought a meeting with President Biden in June 2022, just a few months following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The meeting, which included other world leaders, was planned during the annual G7 Summit.

Aware of Biden’s fatigue during evening hours, German officials arranged a confidential meeting in the early evening to ensure his attendance.

However, Biden did not show up. Instead, Secretary of State Antony Blinken attended and announced that Biden had to go to bed, according to multiple sources cited in the report.

The report underscores how Biden’s aides have meticulously managed his public appearances and interactions, highlighting the 81-year-old President’s mental and physical decline over the past two years.

Measures taken include blocking him from making impromptu remarks to reporters, declining halftime interviews during the last two Super Bowls, limiting his travel due to his lack of stamina, creating barriers to prevent reporters from asking questions, and blasting music at events to drown out reporter inquiries.

A former senior adviser to Biden expressed shock at the President’s decline when they met last summer, describing the situation as “not good.” This sentiment is echoed by other close observers.

A Democratic donor, who saw Biden earlier this year, noted that it was evident he had “lost a step” as he struggled to speak at an event in South Florida. Similarly, donors at a New York fundraiser last year were reportedly struck by how fragile Biden seemed, recalling an instance where he forgot the word “veteran” and had to ask the audience for help.

These observations are alarming considering Biden’s previously robust engagement with the press as a senator and vice president.

Since assuming the presidency, Biden has drastically reduced media access, holding fewer press conferences and interviews than any modern president. This shift has led to increased scrutiny and concerns about his ability to manage the demands of the office effectively.

The incident at the G7 Summit, where Biden’s absence was conspicuous, raises significant questions about his capacity to handle global crises. The war in Ukraine, a critical issue requiring strong leadership and decisive action, underscores the importance of the President’s presence and active involvement in international diplomacy.

Biden’s absence from the meeting, replaced by Secretary Blinken, signals a worrying trend of delegating vital responsibilities to subordinates due to his physical limitations.

Critics argue that the President’s restricted schedule and apparent need for frequent rest periods reflect a broader issue of competency and preparedness to lead the nation, particularly in times of crisis. The optics of a president unable to attend a critical meeting because he needs to sleep do little to inspire confidence in his leadership abilities.

The White House has downplayed concerns about Biden’s stamina and mental acuity, emphasizing his achievements and policy successes. However, the persistent reports of his declining health and limited engagement with the press continue to fuel doubts about his fitness for office. Supporters argue that Biden’s measured approach and reliance on his experienced team demonstrate prudent leadership, ensuring that decisions are well-considered and not rushed.

Nonetheless, the incident at the G7 Summit adds to a growing list of instances where Biden’s absence or apparent confusion has raised eyebrows. From forgetting names and words to appearing disoriented during public appearances, these moments have not gone unnoticed by the public and the media.

As the 2024 election approaches, Biden’s health and capacity to serve a second term will undoubtedly be a focal point of the campaign. Republican challengers are likely to seize on these concerns, framing Biden as unfit to lead and highlighting the need for a more vigorous and engaged president.

In the meantime, the administration faces the challenge of addressing these concerns head-on. Transparency about Biden’s health, coupled with reassurances of his ability to manage the demands of the presidency, will be crucial in maintaining public trust and confidence.

The reported incident at the G7 Summit serves as a stark reminder of the importance of presidential presence and engagement, especially during times of international crisis. As the world navigates the complexities of the Ukraine conflict and other global challenges, strong and decisive leadership from the United States remains indispensable.

The American public and the international community will be watching closely, scrutinizing Biden’s every move and assessing his capability to lead effectively in these turbulent times.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for all of your news needs.

Biden interviewer reveals the truth that Democrats are desperately trying to hide


The Radical Left had a chance to replace Biden. But instead, they seem to just be covering for him.

But a Biden interviewer has revealed the truth that Democrats are trying to hide.

In a moment that has captured significant attention, George Stephanopoulos, ABC News’ chief anchor, was recently approached by TMZ on the bustling streets of New York City.

When asked his candid opinion about President Joe Biden’s ability to serve another term, Stephanopoulos, engrossed in his phone, made a surprising remark. “I don’t think he can serve four more years,” he said, sparking a whirlwind of speculation and debate.

TMZ, known for its penchant for sensationalism, quickly ran the footage, igniting a firestorm. Stephanopoulos, realizing the potential implications of his candid street-side commentary, swiftly reached out to TMZ to retract his statement.

“Earlier today,” he stated, “I responded to a question from a passerby. I shouldn’t have.” ABC News was quick to distance itself from the comment, issuing a statement that “George expressed his own point of view and not the position of ABC News.”

The timing of this incident couldn’t have been worse for the Biden administration. Just days earlier, Biden had sat down with Stephanopoulos for an interview in Wisconsin, a critical effort to quell mounting concerns about his fitness for office following a dismal debate performance against Donald Trump in Atlanta on June 27.

During the debate, Biden appeared his age, often freezing mid-sentence, looking confused, and struggling to articulate his thoughts coherently. At times, his sudden outbursts of anger only added to the growing unease about his capability to lead.

The White House was quick to attribute Biden’s debate debacle to a “bad night,” emphasizing that he was otherwise in good health.

In his interview with Stephanopoulos, which aired the following Friday night, Biden attempted to downplay the incident, describing it as “a bad episode” and attributing it to an illness he had been battling in the days leading up to the debate.

Notably, Biden declined to undergo an independent medical examination, further fueling skepticism about his health.

Stephanopoulos pressed Biden on his declining approval ratings, which have continued to plummet since the debate. Biden’s response was characteristically defiant. “I don’t believe that’s my approval, that’s not what our polls show,” he asserted, dismissing the concerning data.

The interview took a poignant turn when Stephanopoulos asked Biden what he would do if he lost to Trump in the upcoming general election, an election that has seen increasing calls from within his own party for him to step aside. Biden’s response was a mixture of defiance and idealism.

“I’ll feel as long as I gave it my all and I did the goodest job I know I can do, that’s what this is about. Look George, think of it this way. You’ve heard me say this before, I think the United States and the world is at an inflection point,” he said, echoing a familiar theme of his presidency.

The political fallout from Stephanopoulos’s candid remark has been swift and fierce. On The Daily Show, Jon Stewart didn’t mince words. “That’s not what this is about! There are no participation trophies in endgame democracy,” he exclaimed, reflecting the frustration and urgency felt by many.

From a conservative perspective, Stephanopoulos’s candid admission aligns with the growing chorus of voices questioning Biden’s ability to continue leading the nation. The president’s age and apparent cognitive decline have been a topic of concern not just among conservatives but across the political spectrum.

The debate debacle only served to highlight these fears, showcasing a president who struggled to keep pace, articulate his vision, and respond coherently to the pressing issues of the day.

Biden’s refusal to undergo an independent medical examination is particularly troubling. In an era where transparency and accountability are paramount, the president’s decision to withhold a clear assessment of his health raises red flags. The American people deserve to know that their leader is fit to serve, especially as the nation faces unprecedented challenges both domestically and globally.

Moreover, Biden’s dismissal of his declining approval ratings suggests a disconnect from the concerns of the electorate. Polls are a reflection of public sentiment, and ignoring them does not bode well for a president seeking re-election.

The data doesn’t lie: Americans are increasingly skeptical of Biden’s ability to lead effectively, and his refusal to acknowledge this reality only deepens the divide.

The political landscape is at a critical juncture, with the 2024 election shaping up to be one of the most consequential in recent history. Biden’s continued insistence on running despite mounting evidence of his decline is a gamble that could have far-reaching implications. The Democratic Party faces a crucial decision: stick with an incumbent who appears increasingly unfit for office or pivot to a new candidate who can energize the base and present a viable alternative to Donald Trump.

In conclusion, George Stephanopoulos’s candid street-side remark has opened a Pandora’s box of questions about Joe Biden’s viability as president. From a conservative viewpoint, it underscores the urgent need for clarity and accountability in leadership.

The American people deserve a president who is not only willing but also able to lead effectively. As the nation approaches a critical election, these questions must be addressed head-on, with transparency and honesty, to ensure a future that reflects the true will of the people.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Donald Trump has finally released an announcement regarding his new VP


Donald Trump has taken his time in letting the public know anything about his VP pick. But now, it seems he is rolling back the curtain.

And Trump has finally released an announcement regarding his VP pick.

Former President Donald Trump, the frontrunner for the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential election, is poised to announce his vice-presidential pick by July 15th, coinciding with the commencement of the Republican National Convention (RNC) in Milwaukee.

This much-anticipated announcement has stirred significant excitement and speculation within the GOP and among political pundits nationwide.

In an appearance on Fox & Friends, Trump advisor Jason Miller provided insight into the timing of the announcement, stating, “It could happen any time this week.”

Miller added, “By this time next Monday, we will know who President Trump has selected as his running mate for the 2024 election. It could happen literally right up until the first day of the convention.”

The shortlist for Trump’s running mate includes notable figures such as Senator Marco Rubio, JD Vance, and North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, among others who have actively supported Trump’s campaign efforts. The selection process has been shrouded in secrecy, fueling intense speculation and analysis.

The Shortlist: Key Contenders

Marco Rubio: The Florida Senator, known for his strong conservative stance on issues such as immigration and foreign policy, has been a prominent figure in the Republican Party. Rubio’s experience and national recognition make him a strong contender for the vice-presidential slot. His alignment with Trump’s policies and his ability to appeal to a broad base of Republican voters add to his appeal.

JD Vance: The Ohio Senator and author of “Hillbilly Elegy” has emerged as a rising star within the GOP. Vance’s background and his ability to connect with working-class voters could bolster Trump’s appeal in crucial swing states. Vance has been a vocal supporter of Trump’s America First agenda, emphasizing the need for economic revitalization and addressing the concerns of middle America.

Doug Burgum: The North Dakota Governor brings executive experience and a strong track record of conservative governance to the table. Burgum’s leadership in a predominantly rural state aligns with Trump’s emphasis on agricultural and energy policies. His expertise in these areas could prove advantageous in shaping a comprehensive and appealing campaign platform.

Jason Miller highlighted the strategic importance of the vice-presidential pick, emphasizing the need for a candidate who can “step in and do the job on day one.” This criterion underscores Trump’s focus on selecting a running mate with the experience, capability, and political acumen to assume the presidency if necessary.

Miller also speculated on the potential Democratic ticket, expressing doubts about the stability of the Biden-Harris duo. “We don’t know if that’s going to be Kamala, or maybe they swap her out for someone who’s even more liberal, more extreme, although that might be tough to do,” Miller remarked. This uncertainty within the Democratic camp adds another layer of intrigue to the unfolding political landscape.

As the RNC approaches, the Republican Party is gearing up for a crucial moment in its campaign strategy. The vice-presidential pick will play a pivotal role in shaping the party’s message and rallying support among various factions within the GOP. Trump’s influence remains a defining factor, and his choice of running mate will signal his vision for the future of the party.

Moreover, the vice-presidential selection will set the stage for the upcoming vice-presidential debate. “I look ahead as a campaign strategist to what does that vice presidential debate look like,” Miller said. This debate will be a critical moment for the GOP to contrast its policies and vision with those of the Democratic ticket.

President Trump has kept his decision-making process close to the vest, adding to the suspense surrounding the announcement.

He has previously hinted at having a clear idea of who he will choose, stating, “It’s almost an embarrassment of riches that there are so many good people.” This abundance of qualified candidates underscores the depth of talent within the Republican Party.

Miller confirmed that the list of potential running mates extends beyond the widely speculated names, indicating that Trump is considering a diverse array of candidates.

“President Trump has discussed even more names than that,” Miller noted, highlighting the thoroughness of the selection process.

As the political world eagerly awaits Trump’s announcement, the focus remains on the RNC in Milwaukee. The convention will serve as a platform for Trump to galvanize support and articulate his vision for America’s future. The selection of a vice-presidential candidate will be a defining moment, setting the tone for the campaign and providing a clear contrast to the Democratic ticket.

In a political climate marked by uncertainty and change, Trump’s announcement will be a pivotal moment, shaping the trajectory of the 2024 presidential race. The Republican Party, energized by the anticipation of the RNC, stands ready to unite behind its chosen candidates and present a compelling vision for the nation.

As the countdown to Monday continues, the spotlight remains firmly on Trump and his impending decision. The choice of a running mate will not only influence the dynamics of the campaign but also reflect Trump’s strategic priorities and his commitment to leading America towards a prosperous and secure future.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for updates on this developing story and more.

Terrifying threat from China exposes Joe Biden’s foreign incompetence


Joe Biden seems to be doing everything he can to weaken America. And new developments highlight this.

Because a terrifying new threat from China has exposed Joe Biden’s foreign incompetence.

Recent reports have surfaced indicating that Communist China is in the process of constructing a military spy base in Cuba, significantly raising concerns about national security in the United States.

Newly published satellite images by The Wall Street Journal reveal the base’s development in El Salao, a town located just outside of Santiago de Cuba. Alarmingly, this new installation is in close proximity to the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay.

The construction of this base commenced early in President Joe Biden’s administration and is reportedly designed to accommodate a large formation of antennas known as a circularly disposed antenna array.

This sophisticated array is capable of locating and intercepting electronic signals, marking a significant leap in China’s espionage capabilities, even if they are utilizing older technology that both the U.S. and Russia have long abandoned.

The spy base at El Salao is not an isolated endeavor but part of a broader network of Chinese intelligence installations in Cuba.

According to reports, it joins three other bases located at Bejucal, Wajay, and Calabazar. Intelligence officials warn that these facilities represent a severe national security threat to the United States.

By leveraging Cuba’s proximity to the U.S., China is positioned to intercept sensitive electronic communications from U.S. military bases, space facilities, and both military and commercial shipping routes. Additionally, these installations could potentially facilitate the surveillance of American citizens, raising profound privacy and security concerns.

The establishment of these bases is part of China’s aggressive strategy to expand its footprint and influence in Latin America and the Caribbean.

This expansion aims not only to weaken the U.S. presence in the region but also to challenge the U.S. for global supremacy. China’s strategic investments and projects across the region underline this ambition.

For instance, China is constructing a megaport in Peru, which has raised alarms among U.S. officials.

They fear this port could shift the balance of power in the region and make Latin American countries more susceptible to economic coercion from Beijing.

Similarly, China is making significant inroads into Argentina, Honduras, Colombia, and Brazil through various projects, further extending its influence in the Western Hemisphere.

One of the most concerning examples of China’s encroachment in the region is its efforts to effectively take over the paradise island of Antigua, situated just a few hundred miles from the U.S. Virgin Islands.

China is developing a Chinese-run special economic zone on the island, which will feature its own customs and immigration formalities, a shipping port, and a dedicated airline.

This zone will even have the capability to issue passports, according to a report from Newsweek. The economic zone will support a wide range of businesses, from logistics to cryptocurrencies and even facial surgery and virology.

This ambitious project in Antigua exemplifies China’s broader strategy: to create enclaves of Chinese influence and control that can operate with a degree of autonomy from the host nation, thereby solidifying its economic and political foothold in key strategic locations.

The Biden administration faces mounting pressure to address these developments. Critics argue that the administration’s policies have not been sufficiently robust in countering China’s expansionist agenda.

They assert that more decisive actions are necessary to protect U.S. interests and maintain the country’s strategic advantage in the Western Hemisphere.

There is also a call for increased cooperation with regional allies to counterbalance China’s growing influence. Strengthening economic and military ties with countries in Latin America and the Caribbean is seen as essential to counter China’s encroachment and to reassure these nations of America’s commitment to their sovereignty and security.

The revelation of China’s construction of a military spy base in Cuba near Guantanamo Bay marks a significant escalation in the geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China. It underscores the lengths to which China is willing to go to challenge U.S. dominance and expand its influence in the Western Hemisphere.

As China continues its aggressive expansion, it is imperative for the U.S. to adopt a comprehensive and strategic approach to counter these moves, protect national security, and uphold its position as the leading global superpower. The stakes are high, and the time for decisive action is now.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.

Capitol bomb threat by Radical Leftists has left citizens terrified


The Radical Left is known for extremism. But no one thought they would take things this far.

And a Capitol bomb threat by Radical Leftists has left citizens terrified.

On Saturday, the serene setting of the Pennsylvania State Capitol in Harrisburg was shattered by a bomb threat, allegedly emailed by a pro-Palestine individual.

The threat triggered an immediate and robust response from law enforcement and state officials, highlighting the persistent dangers facing our nation’s institutions and the urgent need for vigilance and security.

Eric Veronikis from the Pennsylvania Department of General Services explained in a statement that the threat was sent via email to all members of the House of Representatives and Senate.

The email, ominously titled “My Manifesto,” demanded that President Joe Biden publicly denounce Israel as an “illegitimate state” and threatened to detonate explosives hidden in and around the State Capitol if the demand was not met. The sender also claimed to be armed with a knife and inside the Capitol.

“The Capitol Police immediately worked with House and Senate security, as well as the Office of the PA Courts, to issue an immediate evacuation notice to those in the buildings,” Veronikis stated, according to CBS News.

This swift and coordinated response underscores the critical importance of preparedness and the seamless cooperation among various security agencies.

Capitol Police, the FBI, Pennsylvania State Police, House and Senate security, and the Dauphin County Sheriff’s Office quickly mobilized to ensure the safety of the area. A thorough search, including K9 units, was conducted, but no explosives were found.

Representative Ryan Bizzarro shared a screenshot of the threatening email on social media, revealing the perpetrator’s disturbing motives.

The email’s explicit connection to pro-Palestine sentiments and its demand for a geopolitical stance from the President raises troubling questions about the intersection of domestic security and international politics.

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro responded to the incident, reassuring the public that no explosives were found during the K9 search of the Capitol Complex perimeter.

“Capitol Police and the FBI are still actively conducting a comprehensive search and investigation in coordination with the Pennsylvania State Police, House and Senate security, and the Dauphin County Sheriff’s Office to ensure the safety of the area,” Shapiro added.

This incident is a stark reminder of the persistent threats posed by radical ideologies and the lengths to which some individuals will go to promote their agendas.

The pro-Palestine angle of the threat, in particular, highlights the volatile nature of Middle Eastern politics and its far-reaching implications.

As the situation in Israel and Palestine continues to be a contentious issue globally, it is essential to remain vigilant against the potential for such conflicts to spill over into domestic threats.

From a conservative perspective, this incident underscores several key points. First and foremost, it reaffirms the necessity of a robust national security apparatus. The quick and effective response by Capitol Police and other security agencies is commendable and highlights the importance of well-funded and well-trained law enforcement.

Conservatives have long advocated for strong support of our police and security forces, and this incident is a clear example of why such support is crucial.

Secondly, the threat brings to light the ongoing debate about immigration and the vetting process for individuals entering the country. While the identity of the perpetrator has not been disclosed, the nature of the threat raises concerns about radical ideologies infiltrating our borders.

Conservatives have consistently argued for stricter immigration controls and thorough vetting processes to ensure that individuals who pose a threat to national security are not allowed entry into the country.

Furthermore, the demand for a political statement against Israel reflects the dangerous rise of anti-Semitism and anti-Israel sentiments. Conservatives have been vocal in their support for Israel, recognizing it as a key ally in the Middle East and a bastion of democracy in a volatile region. This incident serves as a reminder of the importance of standing firm with our allies and denouncing extremist ideologies that seek to undermine our values and security.

The incident also highlights the crucial role of communication and transparency from our elected officials. Representative Ryan Bizzarro’s decision to share the threatening email publicly was a commendable move that provided clarity and transparency to the public.

It is essential for government officials to keep the public informed, especially during security threats, to maintain trust and ensure that citizens are aware of the measures being taken to protect them.

Lastly, this event underscores the necessity for unity in the face of threats. While political divisions are an inherent part of democracy, incidents like this remind us that security and safety are common concerns that transcend party lines. It is crucial for all Americans, regardless of political affiliation, to support measures that ensure the safety of our institutions and the people who serve within them.

In conclusion, the bomb threat at the Pennsylvania State Capitol is a sobering reminder of the ever-present dangers posed by radical ideologies. It highlights the importance of strong national security, thorough vetting processes, unwavering support for our allies, transparent communication from officials, and unity in the face of threats.

As we continue to navigate the complexities of both domestic and international security, it is imperative to remain vigilant and steadfast in our commitment to protecting our nation and its values.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more of the TRUTH in the news.

Donald Trump’s latest election promise has sent Democrats running for the hills


Donald Trump has made many election promises that terrify Democrats. But this most recent one will completely unravel their secret plan.

And Trump’s latest election promise has sent Democrats running for the hills.

In a stirring address released via social media, former President Donald Trump announced a comprehensive plan aimed at ending what he terms “citizenship tourism” and addressing the broader issue of illegal immigration.

Trump, who has been a vocal critic of current immigration policies, outlined his intentions to issue an executive order that would fundamentally alter the landscape of birthright citizenship in the United States.

“As part of my plan to secure the border on day one in my new term in office, I will sign an executive order making clear to federal agencies that, under the correct interpretation of the law, going forward, the future children of illegal immigrants will not receive automatic citizenship,” Trump declared in the video.

Trump’s proposed executive order seeks to deny automatic citizenship to children born in the United States to illegal immigrants. This move is grounded in his belief that current policies surrounding birthright citizenship serve as a magnet for illegal immigration.

He argues that by eliminating automatic citizenship for children of illegal immigrants, the United States can significantly reduce the incentives that drive illegal immigration.

“Birthright citizenship, as it stands, encourages illegal immigration. It’s a loophole that must be closed to protect our nation’s sovereignty and the integrity of our immigration system,” Trump stated.

One of the more controversial aspects of Trump’s plan is its aim to end “birth tourism.” This practice, according to Trump, involves individuals from around the world coming to the United States with the primary intention of giving birth on American soil, thereby securing U.S. citizenship for their children.

“Hundreds of thousands of people from all over the planet squat in hotels for their last few weeks of pregnancy to illegitimately and illegally obtain U.S. citizenship for the child, often to later exploit chain migration to jump the line,” Trump asserted. By requiring at least one parent to be a citizen or legal resident, Trump believes this practice can be effectively curbed.

The proposed executive order is expected to face significant legal challenges, particularly concerning the interpretation of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The 14th Amendment states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” This has traditionally been interpreted to mean that any child born on U.S. soil is automatically granted citizenship.

Critics argue that Trump’s proposal is unconstitutional and that the 14th Amendment’s guarantees cannot be altered through executive action alone.

Legal experts predict that any such order would quickly be contested in court, setting the stage for a potentially protracted legal battle.

However, Trump, his supporters, and many Americans believe that the original intent of the 14th Amendment has been misinterpreted and that it should not apply to the children of illegal immigrants.

They argue that the amendment was intended to grant citizenship to freed slaves, not to anyone born on American soil regardless of their parents’ legal status.

Trump’s announcement is a direct response to what he describes as President Biden’s “mass amnesty” policies. Under the Biden administration, pathways to citizenship have been made more accessible, with recent executive orders allowing nearly 1.5 million illegal immigrants to cross the border into the United States each year.

“The Biden administration’s policies have thrown open the floodgates to illegal immigration. We need strong, decisive action to protect our borders and our nation’s future,” Trump said. He emphasized that his plan would not only address the immediate crisis but also ensure a long-term solution to illegal immigration.

Should Trump’s executive order come to fruition, it would represent one of the most significant shifts in U.S. immigration policy in decades. Supporters argue that it would restore the rule of law and protect American jobs and resources from being strained by illegal immigration.

“This is about fairness, about ensuring that those who play by the rules and come here legally are not undermined by those who circumvent the system,” said a spokesperson from Trump’s campaign.

Donald Trump’s announcement marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over immigration in the United States. His plan to end birthright citizenship and tackle “citizenship tourism” is a bold move that underscores his commitment to securing the nation’s borders and addressing illegal immigration head-on.

While the proposed executive order will undoubtedly face significant legal challenges, it reflects a broader effort to redefine the parameters of American citizenship and immigration policy. As the nation looks ahead to the next presidential election, immigration remains a key issue that will shape the political landscape and the future of the United States.

Stay tuned to Prudent Politics.