Biden’s DOJ believes they have Donald Trump dead to rights. But they’ve made a critical mistake.
Because a top lawyer has utterly demolished the latest indictment case against Trump.
It really does feel like the banana republic under the “leadership” of President (supreme leader) Biden is well underway, doesn’t it?
Donald Trump has been hit with indictment after indictment and charged with countless felonies, many of which are beyond bogus.
The latest indictment against Trump may be the most insanely unhinged charge yet.
Special Counsel Jack Smith announced the latest indictment against Donald Trump earlier this week, this time over the events that took place on January 6th, 2021 in the wake of the 2020 Presidential election.
Donald Trump, to this day, maintains that the election was fixed. But that is his own opinion that no one can strip away from him, or shouldn’t at least.
The Democrats believe that Donald Trump should be silenced and face the consequences of daring to question the accepted narrative about the 2020 Presidential election.
It’s obvious that at the core of this new charge against Donald Trump for allegedly trying to overturn the election results is whether or not Trump’s First Amendment rights apply.
Well, a top attorney and legal expert believes that is going to be the undoing of the Department of Justice in their case against Trump.
Jonathan Turley, a professor at George Washington University’s Law School, says that the vast majority of the case against Trump is protected by Trump’s First Amendment rights. And when you take all that out of the picture, there’s almost nothing left for the DOJ to charge Trump with.
Turley put Jack Smith on blast for trying to bring forward the “first criminal indictment” of disinformation.
“Special Counsel Jack Smith just issued the first criminal indictment of alleged disinformation in my view. If you take a red pen to all of the material presumptively protected by the First Amendment, you can reduce much of the indictment to haiku…” Turley shared on Twitter after the news of the Trump indictment was released.
Special Counsel Jack Smith just issued the first criminal indictment of alleged disinformation in my view. If you take a red pen to all of the material presumptively protected by the First Amendment, you can reduce much of the indictment to haiku…
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) August 1, 2023
Turley says that while he believes the case against Trump in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents indictment is fairly strong, he thinks this new indictment is the opposite.
He likens this new charge to the case when Virginia’s former Governor Bob McDonnell had his charge thrown out by the U.S. Supreme Court, a charge that was prosecuted by Jack Smith.
…I felt that the Mar-a-Lago indictment was strong. This is the inverse. This is closer to the case against former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell where Smith was overturned by an unanimous Supreme Court…
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) August 1, 2023
Finally, the law professor highlighted how deeply disturbing the Jack Smith indictment announcement was because his own signals were crossed.
…The press conference held by Smith only deepened the unease for some of us. Smith railed against the January 6th riot and made it sound like he was indicting Trump on incitement. He didn't. The disconnect was glaring and concerning.
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) August 1, 2023
Be sure to stay tuned to Prudent Politics for more updates on the Trump legal cases that will be unfolding in the next few months.
